HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966-04-12Regular Meeting
of the
Euless City Council
April 12, 1966
CALL TO ORDER
15
Mayor Pro Tern Bobby Fuller called the
Regular Meeting of the Euless City Council t6 order at 8;00 P.M. in the Council
Chambers of the Euless City Hall, with the following Councilmen present: Councilmen
Erank Douglass, - Harold Samuels, B i l l Byers and Don Warren. (Mayor W. G . F u l l e r
away on vacation.)
.Also present were City Manager Lee Cowell,
City Attorney James Cribbs and City Secretary Vada Ferris.
INVOCATION
.The Invocation was given by Councilman
Harold Samuels.
VISITORS
Visitors in attendance were Mr. and Mrs,
V. M. Braley, Mr. and Mrs. M. W. Burnham; .Messrs, VVn R. Brummett, Gene Robinson,
Jack Nol -en, Ivan Eubanks, Jack B.ul lard, Henry Uselton, J.r., Paul Gregory, Z. Joe
Thornton, B i l l Hendricks, B i l l Ratliff, W. M. Sustaire;. and ,Mrs. Betty Potthoff.
The Minutes of the Called Meeting of
March 17, 1966 and Regular Meeting of March 22, 1966 were approved as written.
PUBLIC HEARING, REZONING 4.865 ACRES
CODY AND CODY
City Manager Cowell read minutes of the
Planning and Zoning Commission, dated March 15,, 1966, Item 111, Zoning Case No, 148,
The Minutes reflect that Mr. Bill Brazil] requests the- rezoning of a tract of land
out of the J. W. Haynes Survey, from "A" Residential to "C" Commercial, for the pur-
pose of constructing a ten thousand (10,000) square foot building to house the sales
and service center for Cody and Cody Engineering Company. (This property located
on Highway 157, near the Northern City Limit line.)
Mayor Pro Tem Fuller asked if there were
proponents. in th-i s zon -ing case, There were none; therefore, he inquired if there
were opponents,
Mr. V. M. Braley stated that he owns
property on the South side of the ppoperty in question,.and that he is opposed to
the rezoning. He stated that the City of Euless.has Commercial Property in other
areas and, in his opinion, should not continue to rezone property u n ti I properti6ss
already designated commercial have been Utilized.
16
(Page Two, Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, Euless City Council, April 12, 19 66)
Mr. M. W. Burnham stated that he also is
opposed to the rezoning and inquired if rezoning this property would make a dif-
ference in the tax rate, _
City Manager Cowell informed Mr. Burnham
that the taxes are based-on- a fair market value of this property, and that the Coun-
cil -would not be An a position to say what the taxes would be on the property.
City Attorney Cribbs stated that usually,
Commercial Property becomes more valuable.
Mr. Burnham inquired if he could be
"squeezed out ", if all the property on either side of his property is zoned commer-
cial, He was informed that his property wi I I stay Residential unless he requests
that it be rezoned,
Mr. Braley stated that he does not consid-
er that he is being unfair in being objectionable to this rezoning -- that he con-
siders he is being "put out on a limb ", if adjacent property is zoned Commercial.
Mrs. Burnham stated that the adjacent
properties Jn this area,.on Highway No, 157, are not zoned Commercial, and she is
of -the,opiniom that commeecial zoning will not, extend to this area on Highway No.
157. . (Most of commercial property on Highway No, 157 further South,' near Huffman
Drive and Highway. No, 183.)
Mr. Braley stated that the two young.-men
who have purchased the property did so because the property was priced low.
Mayor Pro Tem FOI-ler inquired i-f •there-
were other persons desiring to comment in this rezoning case, There being none,
Mayor Pro Tem Fuller declared the Public Hearing closed and thanked Mr. and Mrs,
Braley and Mr. and Mrs, Burnham for their appearance before the Council.
It was agreed by the Counci1 that •a .de
cision in this Rezoning Case be postponed, at this time, in order to secure an
opinion from the land planning firm, Robert Caldwell and Associates, recently em-
Mloyed by the City. (This information to be available: at the next Regular Council
eeting,. on A p r i l 26, NIA.) r
APPREC I AT I ON CERTIFICATE,
HENRY USELTON, JR.
Mayor Pro Tem Fuller stated that, at this
time, he would deviate from the Agenda, and presented Mr. Henry Uselton, Jr. a
Certificate of Appreciation for his services on the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Mayor Pro Tem Fuller expressed appreciat -ion for the Members of the Council and the
City Administration to Mr, Uselton, for his years -of service to the City, as a Mem-
ber of the Planning and Zoning Commission. I
C .;
17
Page Three, Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, Euless City Council. April 12- 1466
RESOLUTION NO. 132
ASSESSMENT ROLL REVISION
City Attorney James Cribbs presented
Resolution No, 132, amending and correcting the Assessment Roll adopted by Reoolu-
tion No. 77b - this being necessary, due to several deficiencies in the roll.
Councilman Samuels made the motion to ap-
prove Resolution No, 132, as presented. Councilman Douglass seconded the motion,
and the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Douglass, Samuels, Byers and Warren
Nays: None,
Mayor Pro Tern Fuller declared the motion carr.ied.
132 on f i I e in- Office of City Secretary.)
IV. r
PIPELINE ROAD APPROACHES
IN BELL. MANOR ADDITION
(Official Copy of Resolution No.
The approaches on Pipeline Road in Bell
Manor Addition was an item tabled at the last Council Meeting, pending a legal
opinion from the City Attorney. (Item X111, March 22, 1966 Council Meeting.)
:1 City Attorney Cribbs stated that this is
by no means, a problem with an easy solution; however, that the City of Euless has
the right to expect the adjoining city to participate in the expense of curb and
gutter, where there are ope6ings onto a Euless street. The property in question is
located in the Town of Bedford, and the City Attarney stated that his recommenda-
tion is that the City of Euless send a letter requesting the Town of Bedford to co-
operate in this matter and similar cases, and that the Town of Bedford advise the
_f-it.y of I_u.less on developments in the future. Also, that the City of Euless ex=
pects the - developers to meet the City of Euless' requirements.
The City ,Attorney stated that, if the
Town of Bedford wi I I not cooperate in this matter, a suit could be filed in Civil
Dirtrict Court,
Councilman Douglass inquired about having
the Town of Bedford place money in escrow for one -half (2) of the cost of the
street, City Attorney Cribbs stated that in compliance with the State laws, the
City of Euless does not have this right -- Statute 1105b, Section .2, states that a
City cannot assess, unless the adjoining City agrees to the assessment. It was
pointed out that a developer may. place money in escrow or enter into an agreement
with the City; however, an assessment agreement cannot be made with the property
owner without approval of the Town of Bedford.
City Manager Cowell stated t h a t , in h i s
opinion, the City of Euless could formulate a Contractual Agreement with the develop-
er, in the cases now pending.
After discussion, Councilman Samuels
In
(Page Four,, M i.nut.es of Regu.1 ar. Counc i =1. Meeting.. April 12, 1866)
made the motion that the City Attorney and City Manager prepare a letter to be sent
to the City of Bedford, for expediting these cases, and authorize the Mayor Pro Tem
to sign this letter for the City of Euless; and that a Contractual-Agreement be
consummated on the cases now in question.
Councilman Byers seconded the motion, and
the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Byers, Samuels, Douglass and Warren
Nays: None
Mayor Pro Tem Fuller declared the motion carried,
Mayor' Pro Tem Fuller was i hformed that
Mr. Gene Robinson was present and interested in this matter. Mayo 'r Pro Tem Fuller
recognized Mr. Robinson, who stated that he is representing Harold Fitzgerald Con-
struction, Company of Arlington,.and that he has constructed a Texaco•Ser\�ice Station
on Pipeline Road, near Central Junior High School, Mr. Robinson stated that, at
the time this firm began this construction, they were unaware that the property was
located in the Town of Bedford; however that he has a complete understanding of the
City of Euless' requirements,
City Manager Cowell inquired of Mr.
Ratliff, Consulting Engineer, if in his opinion, it will be acceptable to the En-
gineers to contact the Developers, for the purpose of discussing the City's Po 1 (bcy
in this matter.
Mr. Ratliff stated that the Engineers
will meet with Mr. Robinson and inform him of the City's policy and agreements,
V:
- SECOND READING. ORDINANCE,N0P. 278
REZON I_NG S. W. MILLS PROPERTY
- - :City 'Manager! Cowell presented Second Read-
ing of Ordinance No. 278, rezoning, from "A" Residential to "'C" Commercial, "a part
of the S. W. Mills Tract, Lot 5, Block 1, S. W. Mills Subdivision, in the vicinity
of Simmons Drive and Highway 183.
Councilman Byers made the motion,to'ap-
prove Second Reading of Ordinance No. 278. Councilman Samuels seconded the motion,
and the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Samuels, Byers, Douglass and Warren
Days: None I
Mayor Pro Tem Fuller declared the motion carried. (Original coDy,of Ordinance No.
278 on file in Office of City Secretary)
VI.
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE REZONING
LUCAS PROPERTY - NORTH OF WILSHIRE VILLAGE
City Manager Cowell presented First
•
Reading of an Ordinance rezoning five and one -half (5D acres, North of Wilshire
Village, rezoned from "A" Residential to "C" Commercial - this property belonging
to James A. and R. Lindley Lucas,
Councilman Douglass made the motion to
approve First Reading of this Ordinance.'' Councilman Byers seconded the motion,
and the vote is as fo1. oWs;,
Ayes: Councilmen Byers, Douglass, Samuels and Warren
Nays: None
Mayor Pro Tem Fuller declared the motion carried. (Second Reading of Ordinance
on April 26, 1966) t
VII.
PROPOSAL FOR UP- DATING MASTER PLAN
ROBERT CALDWELL AND ASSOCIATES
19
City Manager Cowell called to the atten-
tion of the Council the proposal submitted by Robert Caldwell and Associates for
up- dating the City's Master Plan. (Proposal presented at February 22, 1966 meeting.)
The City Manager stated that, in his
opinion, the City is not at this time in a pos i t,i on to, f i nance the up- dating of the
Master Plan; however, the Council Members expressed a desire.to- discuss the pro-
posals with Mr. Caldwell, and the City Manager was instructed to inform Mr.. Caldwell
that on April 19 a Called Meeting will be held for the purpose of discussing the
proposals previously submitted by I /Ir. Caldwell.
VIII.
HARWOOD ROAD CONSTRUCTION
'Mayor Pro Tem Bobby fu 1 ler requested Mr.
Bill Ratliff to inform the Council of the Engineers' recommendations pertaining to
the construction on Harwood Road, near the North Euless Elementary School. He
stated that he is still of the opinion that the best traffic engineering would dic-
t6te a- solid median, as was proposed, and-thet he sympathizes with the property
owners,-on the South side'of Harwood Road; however, that, at the request of the City
Council, the Engineers recommend a break in the median, approximately forty (40)
feet West of'th'e most Westerly residence 'in question. Mr. Ratliff stated that the
Engineers areof the opinion that this is not the best solution, but feels that it
is acceptable, under the circumstances.
After discussion, Councilman Douglass
made the motion to concur with the Engineers' recommendations and that the con-
struction plans be altered accordingly. Councilman Samuels seconded the motion,
an&'the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Samuels, Douglass, Byers and Warren
Nays: None
Mayor Pro Tem Fuller declared the motion carried.
20
PITT
IX:
OATH OF OFFICE
COUNCILMEN WARREN, COUGLASS AND FULLER
' Ci_ty Attorney James Cribbs administered,
the Oath of Office to Councilmen Don Warren, Frank Douglass and Bobby Fuller, who
were elected to the position of City Councilmen on April 5, 1966, (Copy of signed
Oaths on file in Office of City Secretary.)
1:4
ELECTION OF MAYOR PRO TEM
.Mayor Pro Term Bobby Fuller stated that
the recent election necessitates the electing of a Mayor Pro Tern.
Councilman Warren niede the M6t i on ' th�a't
Councilman Bobby R. Fuller be elected to serve as Mayor Pro Tem. Councilman
Dduglass seconded the mdtion, and -the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Warren, Douglass, Sarnuels and Byers
Nays: None
Mayor Pro Tem Fuller expressed appreciation to the Council for their confidence in
him, which was `displayedby their re- electing him to the position of,lIayor Pro Tem.
XI: '
r
PROPOSED APPOINTMENTS TO
CITY COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS
Mayor Pro Tern Bobby Fuller stated that
the next item of business is the appointment of persons to serve on the various
Commissions and Boards of the C•i ty.. .(List of Commissions and Boards submitted to
Members of the Coudc11 prior 'to this meeting.)
It was suggested that, perhaps, some -of
the persons having served on Commissions be designated to serve on other Commissions
in order for them to become acquainted with various phases of City Government.
It was agreed that Mr. Paul Gates should
be app of "nted -to the Planning and Zoning Commission; Mr. Richard Leggett should be
appointed to the Board of Adjustments; Mr. Henry Use] ton be appointed to the Board
of Equalization; Reverend Bob Messer to the Library Board; and Mr. Frank Lindsey,
as a member of the Recreation Board.
After discussion, Councilman Douglass
made the motion that the list of appointments be approved as presented and discuss-
ed. Councilman Warren seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Douglass, Warren, Byers and Samuels
Nays: None
t s
Mayor Pro Tem Fuller declared the motion carried, and the City Secretary was in=
structed to notify all of the Appointees, for confirmation of the appointments.
2 1.
(Pape Seven, Minutes'of Regular: City Council Meeting, April 12_ 1966)
X11. _
APPOINTMENTS - REPRESENTATIVES TO THE
NORTHEAST CITIES ADVISORY COUNCIL
r i
Mayor Pro Tem Furl 4er stated that a motion
was in order for the appointment of two representatives to serve as members of the
Northeast Cit'ies Advisory Council.
Councilman Warren made the motion that
Councilman Douglass be appointed as the City Council representative and Mr, Len
Weber, as the Planning and Zoning Commission representative on the Northeast Cities
Advisory Council., Councilman Samuels seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Warren, Samuels and Byers
Abstained: Councilman Douglass
Mayor Pro Tern Fuller declared the motion car'ried. (City Secretary to inform ap-
pointees of proposed appointments.)
X111.
LETTER RECOMMENDING ACCEPTANCE CF
RAIDER•:DRIVE" IMPROVEMENTS
City Secretsary,Vada Ferris presented a
letter dated April 5, 1966, from the Consulting Engineers, Gregory, Knowlton and
Ratliff, recommending acceptance of improvements, for assessment purposes, of
Raider Drive (Street Contract No. 2). (Copy of letter filed as Official Council
Exhibit in Office of City Secretary.)
..XIV.
RESOLUTION NO. 133, DETERMINING
COMPLETION CF RAIDER DRIVE
City Secretary Vada Ferris presented
Resolution No. 133, determining the completion of and accepting the improvements
of Raider Drive.
Councilman Samuels made the motion to ap-
prove Resolution No. 133, as presented. Councilman Warreh -seednded the motion, and
the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Samuels, Warren, Douglass and Byers
Nays ?. None. -
Mayor Pro Tem,�Fuller declared the motion darried. (This Resolution determines the
work completed on Raider Drive, in order -for assessment, procedures to be begun.)
(Official Copy of Resolution No. 133 on fi I e in Officdeof City Secretary,)
22
(Page Eight, Minutes -of Regular C$ty Council Meeting, April 12, 1966)
XV
{DISCUSSION: ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES
Councilman Byers stated that he has had
several inquiries pertaining to the Release of Lien and the letter accompanying the
release, which is:mai-led to persons; following final payment of street :improvement
assessment. He stated that the inquiries pertain to the recodding fee to be paid
by the property owner; that property owners consider that by paying the street
assessment, they should not be required to pay the recording fee.
City Attorney Cribbs explained that the
assessment is not against the property owner; but - against the property,' and 'in order
for the City to be in a position to assess, in case the property should change
owners during the assessment period, it is necessary to record the. Assessment Roll,
which is done very early in the street construction procedure;
XVI
DISCUSSION: CITY - DEVELOPER AGREE IMENT
DRAINAGE CHANNEL, NORTHEAST CORNER HIGHWAY 183
AT SIMMONS DRIVE
Mr. B i I I Ratliff, Consul ti "ng. Engineer;
reviewed a letter dated April 5, 1966, Subject: 6403 -G, Euless Commercial Develop-
ment, Safeway. Store Site, N.E. Corner Hwy. 183 and Simmons Drive.
3
.:This letter pertains to the sewer facil
ties and drainage at the site proposed for a- new•Safeway Store. The Engineers'
letter presented cost estimates on re- routing -the existing sanitary sewer 11hes "and
construction of the drainage channel in the area. It was established that the
amount of the City's participation w i I I be $5,510.39, and that $17,177.21 should be
placed in escrow by the Developer, for the construction 6f improvements on this
property.
Mayor Pro Tern Fuller recognized Mr. Ralph
Brummett;, representing the' Safeway Stores, who announced that a Safeway u n it i s
planned at this site.
Mr. Brummett stated that there is a time
element in this matter to be considered -, the re- location of the sewer lines must
be completed prior to the �coftstruction of the building; however, the construction of
the drainage channel can be done at a later date.
Consulting Engineer B i I I Rat] iff stated
that it w i I I take approximately sixty (60) days to re- locate the sewer lines.
Mr. Brummett stated that this would be
sufficient time; however, any further delay in re- locating the sewer lines would be
detrimental to-the construction of the building. .
After discussion, Councilman Samuels made
the motion that City Attorney Cribbs and City Engineer B i I I Ratliff prepare the
City - Developer Agreement necessary to proceed with this project. Councilman Bve.rs
(Page Nine, Minutes of ReguIa.r.City Council Meeting, April 12, 1966)
seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Byers, Douglass, Warren and Samuels
Nays: None
-Mayor Pro Tem Fuller declared the.motion carried. (Copy of 'Engineers'
file as Official Council Exhibit, in Office of 'City 'Secretary.)
Xv1 I,
DISCUSSION: DRAINAGE CHANNEL
HIGHWAY 183 EAST OF SIMMONS DRIVE
letter on
M
Consulting Engineer Bill Patl iff informed
the Council that the Drainage Chan.ne.l� on H i.ghway 183 East of S i nnons .Drive is in-
adequate to carry water from the upper portion of the channel, and he has recommended
that the City Manager formally request the Highway Department to re- locate this
portion of the channel.
City Manager CoweII informed the Council
that his office has made a request to Mr. Bob Crook, District Engineer, Texas High-
way Department7,•,to Ith:ls effect:. .
X:V1.I1._
DISCUSSION: FEDERAL GRANT FOR
SEWERAGE FACILITIES
Mr. Paul Gregory, Consulting Engineer,
stated that a decision is needed from the Council concerning application for a
Federal.-Grant for the Sewerage Treatment Fac i.l i t i es which will be needed in the
next few years. He stated that•the City can secure up to thirty par cent (30°j) of
the total facility cost.
After discussion, Councilman Douglass
made the motion that the City Manager be authorized to instruct the Consulting
Engineers to submit an application for the Public Law 660 Grant. Councilman Byers
seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows:
Ayes: :Councilmen Byers, Dou'glass,Samuels and Varren
Nays: Ncne
Mayor Pro Tem Fuller declared the motion carried,
in Office!-of City Secretary. {�.
X IX.-
DISCUSSIO0: POLICE ASSOC IATIONAPERAT[ING,
VENDING MACHINES
(Copy of PuUI is Law 660 on file
City Manager Cowell informed the Council
that the Euless Police Association has made a fo=rmal request (letter) to operate
various coin - operated vending machines in the new buildings at the Civic Center
Complex. He stated .that the Association plans to use the proceeds,. from these
24
(Pane Ten, M insut=es -of Recrular iC i ty Counc i 1 Meetinct, April 12, 1966)
machines in educational and benevolent projects, and that ten per cent (10 %) of the
net profit will be returned to the City, which will be reimbursement for utilities f
and any other expenses incurred by thecClt-y
City Manager Cowell stated that he had re-
quested th4 Attorney's opinion and Mr. Cribbs complied with his request, in a letter
dated April 12, 1966, which states that there are no legal objections to, or 'pro-
hibition against, installing bending machines in the new buildings; however, he did
make the following suggestions:
1. That financial records be kept properly, with regular oritten
reports of expenditures and receipts 'furnished to 'the City
Manager's Off ice.
z .. : Tfiat L i ab i:1 ity insurance be obtained on the machine, to pro-
_ ,tect the City against possible claims.
Chief of Police Sustaire was recognized
and stated that the Police Association is very desirous of the Council's approval of
their request.
After discussion, Councilman Samuels made
the motion that the City Attorney prepare a Contractual Agreement to permit the
Police Association to operate vending machines in the Civic Center Building. Coun-
cilman Warren seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Warren, Byers, Samuel.s and Douglass.
Nays: None
Mayor Pro Tem Fuller declared the motion carried. (Copy of letter from Pb1:i:ce
Association Preside'nt, Lieutenant H M.' Smith, and copy of City Attorney's letter on
file as Off i c< a 1 Council- Exhibits, -i n, Off i ce of City Secretary.)
XX .
WATER PUMP ,1 MPP,0VEMENTS -
CITY WATER WELLS. -
City Manager Cowell informed the Council
that recently, pumps at three of the City's water wells had become —4noperable, and
that the estimated cost of repairs, estimated by Mr. Sam Knight, Water Department
Superintendent, is $16,132 00, Mr. Cowell stated that the Trinity Weil No. 1 0,
which wi }1 cost approximately $1.3,6$3.00, has performed services for eleven'�(II
years, and that he has been advised that this is more than can be expected of a
pump - that a pump should be Ppwlled'' approximately every five (5) years, in order
to, possibly, eliminate extensive repairs in later years.
After Discussion, Councilman Bylmr$.made
the motion that the necessary repairs and improvements to the wells be.appt-oved, as
estimated, in the amount of $ 16,132,00, and that the financing for the repairs be
determined by the City Administrative Offices. Council Warren seconded the mo-
tion, and the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Warren, Byers, Samuels and Douglass
Nays: None
Mayor Pro Tem Fuller declared the motion carried. (Copy of recapitulation of
25
(Page Eleven, Minutes of Regular city Council Meeting, April 12. 1966)
construction cost for three (3) wells, on file in Office of City Secretary.) (1h
answer to a question by Councilman Byers, it was established that it is not neces-
sary to secure bids on this item, since it is necessary to secure parts for repairs
from manufacturer of the pump.)
(Councilman Warren excused himself from the meeting at this time, as the next item
is of personal interest.)
XXI."
DISCUSSION: WATER AND SEWER EXTENSIONS TO
DOCTOR'S CLINIC ON HIGHWAY NO. 157
Consulting Engineer Bill Ratliff reviewed
a letter dated April 6, 1966, Subject 6314 -E 11, Doctor's Clinic on State Highway
157, which stated that the engineers have reviewed the final contractor's estimates
for water and sewer extensions to this project and that the City's participetion
for over -size sewer m�4ns and water mains will amount to an expenditure of $5,217,25.
After discussion, Councilman Byers made
motion to accept the improvements, as outlined by the Consulting Engineers and
authorize an expenditure of $5,217.25 and readjust the reimbursement clause -- 7%
($42.30) . Councilman Douglass seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Byers, Douglass and Samuels
Nays: None
Mayor Pro Tem Fuller declared the motion carried. (Copy of Engineers' letter,
dated April 6, 1966, on file as Official Council Exhibit, in Office of City Secre-
tary.)
GENERAL DISCUSSION
TRAFFIC STUDY
Councilman Samuels stated that, several
weeks ago, Chief of Police W. M. Sustaire had informed the Council that a Highway
Engineer would be in the area and a fraffic study request would be submitted by the
City of Euless to the Texas Highway Department. Councilman Samuels inquired of the
Chief of Police if the Highway Engineer had made this study. Mr. Sustaire advised
that the Engineer had not been available and, therefore, had not been made at this
time.
REGULATING HOURS OF I:OE CREAM VENDORS
Councilman Samuels stated that he has
been contacted by citizens concerning the hours ice cream vendors are permitted to
operate in the City of Euless. He stated that other Cities in the area have passed
an Ordinance regulating hours of operation by these vendors and is of the
opinion, the City of Euless may want to consider a similar Ordinance.
Councilman Samuels was advised that the
City has an Ordinance, specifying certain hours for these vendors to operate.
26
(Page Twelve, Minutes'o€ Regular..Gity Counci 1;Meeting, April 12, 1966)
XXIII..
AWCURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 10;30 P. M.
APPROVED =
,.., ......