Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966-12-13227 Regular Meeting of the Euless' City Council December 13, 1966 CALL TO ORBER Mayor William G. Fuller called the Regular 'Meating of the Euless City Council to order at $ :25 P. M. in the Council Chambers, Euless City Hall, with the following Councilmen present: Messrs. Bobby R. Fuller, Harold Samuels, Frank Douglass and Don Warren (Absent: Counc i'lman B i l l Byers.) Also present were City Manager Lee Cowell, City Attorney James Cribbs, City Secretary Vada Ferris and Mr. Bill Ratliff, representing Gregory, Knowlton & Ratliff, Consulting Engineers. INVOCATION The Invocation was given by Councilman Harold- Samuels. Visitors in attendance were Mesdms. Martha Hand, representing the Fort Worth Star - Telegram,' Betty Potthoff; Messrs. B i l l Ratliff, Stephen Collins, representing Texas Power and Light Company, Mark Gordon, Texas Power and 'Light Company, Joe Wishcamper, represent- ing Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Tom J. Rogers, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Donald P. Langdon, Volunteer Fire Department, Lewis P. Pembroke, Volunteer Fire Department, Joe Wagner, representing Arthur Young it Co., Clifford Hensley, Arthur Young & Co., Joe C. Welborn, C. E. Bright, Kent E. Besley, Gene Schrickel, J'r., R. G. Montgomery; Reagan G. Martin, Attorney for Mr. Montgomery. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Minutes of `the Called Meeting dated September 19, 1966 and the Regular Meeting dated November 22, 1966, were approved as written. PRESENTAT l -ON OF ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT r Mr. Joe Wagner, representing Arthur Young and Company, presented the 1965 -66 Annual Financial Report for the City of Euless and briefly reviewed revenues and expenditures. He stated that the audit reflects sound debt management and explained that this is the audit for the General Fund, Bond Funds and Water and Sewer System revenues and expenditures. 228 (Page Two, Regular Meeting, Euless City Council, December 13, 1966) Mr. Wagner pointed out that the expenditure for the General Fund exceeds the revenues by approximately $25,000.00; however, he commented that this is not unusual in cities experiencing rapid growth and physical changes. Mr. Wagner introduced his associate, Mr. Clifford Hensley.. Mayor Fuller inquired of Mr. Wagner if, in his opinion, the audi't reflected proper financial management, and Mr. Wagner answered affirmatively. Mayor F. u LI e r thanked Mr.' Wagner fl r 'the financial report. II. PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING CASE NO. 157, MR. JOE VUIBORN Mayor Fuller opened the Public Hearing on the rezoning request, From "A" Residential to "B" Local Business by Mr. Joe Welborn, f o r Lots 1 9 , 20 and 2 1 , o f Block 9, Cedar H i l l s Estates.' City Manager Cowell read Planning and Zoning Minutes dated November 1, 1966, Item 1, in which the Planning and Zoning Commission denied the rezoning request. Mayor Fuller inquired if there 'were opponents or proponents in this zoning case, and Mr. Joe Welborn stated that he is desirous of abiding by the zoning ordinance, in the City of Euless, and that, if the City Council does not agree to rezone his property, as requested, he 'requests 'their consideration of a lesser type zoning. He stated that he has been advised that he can request a lesser type zoning without another Publ is Heari ng . City Attorney James Cribbs: stated that if Mr. Welborn desires to request a lesser type zoning, then the - Cbunci? does not have to vote on the rezoning, as requested in Zoning Case No. 157, but that this'matter should be 'presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission„ Mr. Welborn stated that he desires to build apartments on the lots he now owns, and that he has consulted with the property Owners in the area, who are not opposed to apartments. Mr. Welborn presented a plan of his proposed apartment complex, for the Council's consideration. Mayor Fuller inquired if there were other8 present who desired to comment in this zoning case, and there being none, Mayor Fuller declared the Public Hearing closed. City Attorney Cribbs stated 'that it is not compulsory that another Public Hearing be held; however, he strongly urges that the City notify all property owners within 200 feet, of the desired change in zoning requested by Mr. Welborn. 229 (Page Three; Regular fleeting, Euless City Council, December 13, 1966) Councilman Samuels made the motion to deny the'rezoning from "A" Residential to "B" Local Business, as requested by Mr. Welborn, and that this matter be referred to the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the zoning fee be waived. Councilman Warren seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Fuller, Samuels, Douglass and Warren Nays: None Mayor Fuller declared the motion carried. Mr. Welborn thanked the Council for their consideration in the zoning request. REPORT: BOLE RELOCATION AT NORTH MAIN AND HARWOOD ROAD City Manager Cowell 1 introduced.Messrs. Mark Gordon and Stephen Collins, representing Texas Power and Light Company, and Messrs, Joe•Wishcamper and Tom Rogers, representing Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. Mr. Cowell stated that, at the- request-of the Council several weeks ago, he had contacted these representatives, requesting their consideration and the feasibility of relocating the utility poles at the North Main and Harwood Road, intersection. "I Mr. Cowell stated that, possibly, the Consulting Engineer, Mr. Bill Ratliff, might review this matter; however, Mr. Ratliff stated that long before the street construction at this intersection began, the u t i l i t i e s companies were informed of the plans for the street im- provements�and that engineers'of the.util ities companies had met with represent- atives of his firm and discussed the location of the utility poles. Mr. Ratliff stated that at the time of this discussion neither he nor his associates were of the opinion that the poles were, being placed: in an area-where they would be hazardous to traffic, and that, if the poles are not placed properly, according to the Council's opinion, he feels that he is responsible, due to the fact that he acted,as,the.City's representative at a meeting with the utility companies' engineers, establishing the' utility pole locations. Mr. Mark Gordon; of Texas Power and Light, presented each Council Member a drawing of the North Main - Harwood intersection, with existing,!pole locations,_ indicated. He stated. that a few of the poles could be relocated easily by Texas,Power and Light; however, that telephone company structures'are also mounted on these utility 'poles iand> that relocating the telephone company installations might not be as easily accomplished as these in question belonging to Texas Power and Light. He commented that in order to relocate the poles, it w i l l be necessary to secure air easements, as well as land- easements. 230 (Page Four,'Reaular, Meeting, Euless City Council, December 13,. 1966.)... Mayor Fuller commented that he is definitely opposed to poles in the island and poles any - place - - Ahat.�he would like to see all poles removed and all utility installations placed under - ground. In answer to a question, Mr,, Gordon commented that it will cost approximately $2,500.00 to relocate the utility poles at this intersection.) - , Councilman Samuels inquired about signal - ization features at this intersection, 'which will probably be necessary,in the not too distant future, and 14r. Gordon stated that Texas Power and Light Company would not 'object to the signal 1,1 ght,f1 xtures hanging from the new existing light poles. 14r. Gordon stated that Texas Power and Light has been making an extensive study for several years, as to the possiblity and feasibility of under - ground installations, and that, presently, in the City of Euless, two developments will have all under - ground electrical installations. 1,/Ir. Gordon advised the Council that it will be necessary to consult with his firm before making any committments pertaining to the removal of the poles in question., Mr. Tom.Rogers, representing Southwestern Bell Telephone *Company, presented a similar drawing of the intersectiiod at North Main-and Harwood and stated that the . te.i ephone company is planning .to ,go under - ground with their installations, as rapidly as possible;,that this is, being done from a safety standpoint, as well as being considered a leaut[f!cat.ion factor - also that it is more feasible to go-under- ground, as 'faras South- western Bell Telephone Company is concerned. Mr. Rogers stated that it will cost Southwestern Bell Telephone Company approximately $2,100.00 to relocate their facilities at this intersection, and that he, like Mr. Gordon, will have to consult with his firm before committing them to this expenditure.: Mr, Wishcamper, telephone- company District Engineer, stated that it will -be very impractical and costly to:place under- ground facilities East and West on Harwood Road from North Main:Str.ee:t - -'that there is not an economical way this can be done -- that it would be necessary to tear up, the new street which has been installed. ' Mayor Fuller inquired if the under- ground lines on North Main could be. extended farther beyond the Harwood., Road inter- section, in a northerly direction, then extended East and West on Harwood Road. Mr. Wishcamper stated that it will cost approximately $6,500,00 to put under- ground facilities North of North Main Street, then cross North Main Street and go back West on Harwood Road. He further commented that the telephone company would not object to signalization features being placed on utility golds at this intersection. He-commented that the poles can be moved, but his firm desires that the Council know the cost and problems involved in moving 'the poles. Councilman Douglass inquired-if the telephone company and light company can be sued if a fatal accident occured at this intersection, resulting from a car striking the presently existing utility poles. Mr. Wishcamper stated that anyone can get a good lawyer and sue any firm, but that, in his opinion, the pole is not situated where it is very likely to be struck by an automobile. 231 (Page Five, Regular Meeting,- Euless City Council -, '.December 13, 1966) Councilman Samuels stated that he is not certain that the intersection w i I I be safer if the poles are moved or if the intersection would have a more desirable appearance. Councilman Warren stated that, in his opinion, moving' the poles would not help the situation a great deal; however, he would l i k e to see the u t i l i t i e s be placed under - ground at the f i r s t opportun ity'. After considerable discussion, Councilman Warren ` made the motion that the utility poles be left in their present' location, requesting t h a t 'the u t i 1 it i e s be placed under - ground' a's soon as possible. Councilman Samuels seconded -the motion, and the vote i s as follows: Ayes: Councilman Warren, Samuels, F u l l e r and Douglass Nays: None Mayor Fuller declared the motion carried, and thanked representatives of both utility compantes for their consideration in this matter and for their presentations. Mr. Collins of Texas Power and Light stated that the Council may be assured that the Texas Power and Light engineer- ing department will work more closely with the City Engineers, in the future, in order to eliminate such problems, as seem to have been created by the placing o f the u t i l i t y poles at North Main and Harwood Road. Mr. Wishcamper stated that this meeting has been very helpful, and that he has benefited from this discussion; that he desires that the Council know that the telephone company will make every effort to work with the City Engineers very closely in the future on all projects. Chambers-at this time.)' (Counci Iman .,Dougl ass left the Council IV. DRAINAGE CHANNEL EAST CF SOUTH MAIN STREET (TEXAS HIGHWAY DEPARTMF_NT) Mayor Fuller announced that this item would not be discussed at this time, but wi I I be tabled until a later meeting, Mr. Gene Schr i ckel , City Park Planner, V stated that' he'woul'd suggest that the utility' companies consider the inter- sections to be located near the Trinity High School and -the other elementary schools to be constructed in the area in the near future. (Copy of drawings presented by Texas Power and Light and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company on file in Office of City Secretary:) Chambers-at this time.)' (Counci Iman .,Dougl ass left the Council IV. DRAINAGE CHANNEL EAST CF SOUTH MAIN STREET (TEXAS HIGHWAY DEPARTMF_NT) Mayor Fuller announced that this item would not be discussed at this time, but wi I I be tabled until a later meeting, 232 (Page Six. Regular Meeting, ..Euless City Council, December 13. 196 6) V. k ZONING CASE N0. 155, „ . .. MR. ANDY WINTERS The Council reviewed Mr. Winters' request to rezone approximately six (6), acres from "A" Residential to "A - ?'! Duplex, in Timberline Estates Subdivision and was reminded that this case was tabled pending written recommendation from the City's Land Planner,* Robert Cal - dwell it Associates. Mr. Caldwell stated, in his communication to the City dated November 28, 1966, that after careful reconsideration of this rezoning case, he recommends the approval of the rezoning, as requested. Councilman Fuller made the motion to con- cur with the Land Planner's recommendation and rezone,,the property, fr,Qm "A" Residential to "A -2" Duplex, as requested. Councilman Warren ,p_econded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Counci Imen F u I I e r, Samuels and. Warren Nays: None (Councilman Douglass -was absent from the chambers at the time the vote was taken.) Mayor. Fuller declared the motion carried. VI. . . n - I I I I r BIDS FCR •REC'R.EAT I ANAL FAC 1 LIT I ES SOUTH EULESS PARK:AND WILSHIRE ELEMENTARY Mr. Gene Schrickel reviewed the bid tabulation for the Wilshire Elementary and South Euless Park Recreational Facilities and stated that he recommends that his firm be autho;rized..to negotiate with the.low, bidder„ R. W. Gibb,ins, as follows: (COUNCILMAN DOUGLASS RETURNED TO THE COUNCIL ROOM AT THIS TIME) I. Accept the low base 4id plus lighti.ng for both sites , , ,, $19,744-00 + $6,660.00 = $26,404.00 2. Eliminate low bidder's item for Laykold surface ($3,485.00) and low bidder's items for grading and compaction ($1,630.00) $26,404.00 - $5,115. 00 = $ 21, 289 .00 3, Add estimate for separate earthwork $21 , 289.00 + $1 , 000.00 = $22,289.00 4. Recommended total expenditure = $22,289.00 Mayar Fuller inquired if .there is sufficient bond funds for these facilities. Mr. Schrickel commented that there is sufficient money in the Bond Program for these recreational facilities and that for the amount of money to be spent, both areas w i I I have a complete recreational facility. 230 (Page Seven;"aegdlae-- M6etrng; "EdTesS City COUnct 1, December 13, - 1966) (Councilman Bobby Fuller left the Council Room at this time.) Mr. Schrickel stated that the su'rfacing material can be placed on the, tennis courts at a later date, and by omitting this feature at this time, it will not make the facility any less desirable. A Warren made the motion to concur with the and award the bid to the low bidder, R. W. with the stipulation that the bidder will recommended by Mr. Schrickel. Councilman vote i s as follows: fter further discussi'on, Councilman recommendation of the Park Planner G i bb•i ns., i n the amount o f $22,289.00, consent to ,;the negotiations as Samuels seconded the motion, and the Ayes: Councilmen Warren, Samuels and Douglass Nays: None (Councilman Fuller absent from the room at the time of the vote.) Mayor Fuller declared the motion carried. (Copy of Bid Tabulation on f i I e in Office of City Secretary.) Um TAX' .ROLL. ADJUSTMENTS I City Manager Cowell discussed a letter from Mr. Richard Parks, Tax Assessor - Collector, dated November 29, 1966, per- taining to tax col'lections in error for 1964 -65, on property described as Tract 4 and.47A, George B.urgoon Survey, Abstract No. 125. The amount of the tax refund is $74..80, to, the property owner, Mr. Herbert -P. P.r -i -nce and his .sister,- Mrs. Cas5ie 0. Hulsey. However, the letter attached to the Tax Assessor's request for refund is fl'a'n the' propetty owner's attorney, Mr. Sam Billingsley. City Manager Cowell stated that, in his opinion, these taxes should be refunded. Councilman Samuels made the motion that the Council concur with the City Manager's recommendation and refund taxes in the amount of $74.80. Councilman Warren seconded the mention, and' the vote is as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Samuels, Warren and Douglass - Kays; None (Councilman Fuller absent from room at time' of vote.) Mayor-Fuller declared the motion carried. (Copy of Tax Assessor's letter and attachments on file in-office of City Secretary .) 234 (Page Eight, Regular Meeting, Euless City Council, December 13, 1966) VI 11. EAST -WEST THOROUGF -FARE RIGHT -0F -WAY City Manager Cowell discussed a plat previously presented to the Council, showing a proposed street adjacent to the Euless Civic Center property, between Sheppard Drive and Ector Drive, and inquired if the Council desires to dedicate the Right -of -way to the City. After discussion, Councilman Warren made the motion that Mayor Fuller be authorized to sign the Right -of -way documents, dedicating the property to the City. Councilman Fuller seconded the motion and the vote is 'as follows: ` Ayes: Councilmen Douglass, Fuller, Samuels and Warren Nays: None Mayor Fuller declared the motion carried. (The Council authorized this action upon advice of City Attorney, James Cribbs). IX. ni crimQ ioKi - C I TY SALES TAX Mayor Fuller informed the Council that the Texas Municipal League is requesting endorsement of their proposal for a City Sales Tax which i s a means of additional City revenue. The Mayor stated that he is in favor of an enabfing act, which will allow citizens to vote as to whether or not, a sales tax shall be permitted in this City. Councilman Douglass stated that he does not think tit would be'a'fair tax if an adjacent city did not have the tax. - that he i s not i n favor of the tax as prpposed - that he would favor a Sales Tax if all cities had the same tax. Councilman Samuels stated that he is undecided and w i I I abstain if a vote is taken. Councilman Fuller stated he is not "for" or "against ". Councilman Warren stated that, in his opinion, the citizens are paying enough taxes. Mayor Fuller informed the Council that endorsement of the League's Proposal for a Sales Tax does not mean Euless will have a Sales Tax. Councilman Douglass made the motion`'that the Council take no action in this matter. Councilman Fuller seconded the motion'and the vote i s as follows: (Page Nine, Regular Meeting, Euless City Council, December 13.' 1966) Ayes: Councilmen Douglass, Fuller, Warren and Samuels. Nays:, None Mayor Fuller declared the, mot ion. carried. X. NORTHEAST CITIES ADVISORY COUNC I L REPORT: (1) AMBULANCE S E R V I C E 235 Councilman Douglass informed the Council that'the Northeast Cities Advisory Council had recently a'ppointed a committee .t,o s.tudy the feasibllity Qf an area - combined ambulance service to be controlled by' the area cities. (2) FIRE TRAINING FACILITIES Councilman Douglass stated that Haltom City is planning to build a Fire Training facility and that there is a possibility that area cities may have use of this facility. in the future. *Councilman Douglass stated that, if the eight member cities agree to join Haltom City in this facility, the cost for building and maintenance of this project, wi I I be approximqtely, $631.00 per year ,per City'over a five (5) year period and the structure will be on property,owned by the City o.f'Haltom City. After discussion, Councilman Samuels made the motion that the City'of Euless co- operate with 'the other area cities in this matter and vote on Euless participation at such. time a definite plan and specific amount is avaia.able on this project. Councilman Warren seconded the motion and the vote i s as fol' 1 ows: Ayes; Councilmen Douglass, Fuller, Samuels and Warren! Nays: None Ma,yo,r Fuller declared the, motion carried. XI. ITY MANAGER'S REPORT Emergency Equipment Needs for Volunteer Fire Department City Manager Cowell read a list of equip- ment requested by the Volunteer Fire Department and a letter from Director of Public Safety, W. M. (Blackie) Sustaire, concerning these requests. Mr. Cowell explained that he and Mr. Sustaire had met with the Volunteer Fire Department members who had requested to present a priority list of equipment' in the order of greatest need, specifically additional 11 and 22 inch water hose, additional masks and alert equipment. Mr. Cowell commented that he is request- ing Council authority to purchase these emergency items from re- allocated budgeted funds and general fund surplus and lease- purchase agreement; that M (Page Ten, Regular Meeting., Euless City Council, December 13, 1966) $900.00 was budgeted in the Fire Department for minor apparatus, which could be used toward the purchase of some of the f i re hose. He st'ated i t' h a d been estimated that approximately 1500 feet of 2'-z inch and 600 feet of` '1'-z inch hose is needed and that the County w i I I be buying these items i n February under the co -op agreement; that the City can save approximately 20%, over current bid prices by purchasing through the County Co -op Program. Also, that the smoke masks w i I I be purchased by the County in January under the same cooperative program. Mr. Cowell commented on the transistorized slip -on radio receivers which the volunteer firemen wi I I carry with them, in order to be alerted at the time of a fire. He stated that Motorola manufactures a unit called the'- Page -boy which sells for approximately $150.00 each. These units are battery, operated and have to be charged about once a month. The units can be turned on 24 hours a day or any lesser number of hours and have several advantages. He commented that the console presently 'used in the Police and Fire Departments has the equipment installed".in it to transmit the signal to these uni'ts so 'the City' would only need to purchase the receivers. Five (5) units'would cost - $750.00 a0proximately and if the purchase is fl-a'n Motorola this can be added''to the purchase price of the lease- purchase contract for. the console and paid on a monthly basis over the next few years. Mr; Sustaire commented that there are other types of receiving equipment; however, after discussion with other City Fire Department' personnel, he 'has determined that the Motorola units would be his recommendation. In answer to questions by Members of the - Council -, he stated that' there is a cheaper unit called the Page - master for approximately' $1.39.00. A Member of the Volunteer Fire Department was pre'sen -t and stated. that he''has hea'rd that the Motorola unit can be picked up from the truck as well as T'rom the base station. Members of the Council' discussed that, perhaps, 'more sirens are needed to alert the Volunteer Firemen. ' The City Manager commented that we should view this matter from the Volunteer Fireman's standpoint - that all are in agreemerit that a better alerting system i s needed for the volunteers, 'and. providing this' alerting system would help to satisfy the feeling of . 'frust'ration that the volunteers 'have in not receiving the alert at the t'ime of a fire. The City Manager stated that the unit has the advantage in having a built -in toner in the console. Mayor Fuller asked if there is money in the budget for these items, 'and the City Manager stated that the City can finance about $800.00 of this. Councilma'n Samuels a'sked T f i t might be possible to lease this equipment -- that $750.00 is a lot to experiment with. Mr. Sustaire answered negatively and the City Manager stated that Motorola has said that they would assist the City in disposing of these units„ if they a,r.e not satisfactory to the City's needs. Councilman Samuels inquired if the City Manager feels that better service would be available to our tax payers with this additional equipment. The City Manager state'd that he feels this equipment wi I I satisfy the volunteer firemen to the extent that they wi I I be alerted properly when a fire exists. ' Counci Iman Douglass inquired ''as to how it was, determined to purchase five, (5) units,: The, City Manager stated that they are hopeful that one (1) unit would alert more than- one'fireman;' that.the fire - men'wi 11 have an'opportunity to use these unifs''to etermine if they are .valuable to them. (Page Eleven, Regular Meeting; Euless - C -i -t.y Coune iA ; "December 13. 1966) Councilman Douglass commented that he i s I' appreciative of the volunteer firemen and their services, but would like to see other avenues explored in this matter. He asked what -other cities are using for alerting equipment. Mr. Sustaire stated that most of the cities are using some type of receiving system and there are several different kinds. Mayor Fuller inquired if these units have been tried by our department. Mr. Sustaire stated that these firms are reluctant to let you try these units before purchasing. Mr. Sustaire commented that he has discussed units with ten or twelve Fire Chiefs on four different occasions and he recommends the Motorola Page -boy over the other type equipment. He stated this equipment can be used in the Police Department and Water Depart- ment, as well as the Fire Department. The City Manager stated that cash is not necessary at this time -- can use the -$800.00 in the budget and take the balance from surplus emergency funds, under 'the lease- purchase agreement. Mayor Fuller asked if other F i r e Department purchases w i l l be necessary t h i s year, since a l l the funds appropriated in the F i r e ' Department budget w i l l be used on these items. Mr. Sustaire stated that you cannot say you w i I I not have to have emergency needs; that you could lose a complete load of water hose and this emergency would have to be met. Mr. Sustaire commented that this purchase of hose i s an emergency request. After considerable discussion, Counci 1- mmn Warren made the motion to approve the City Manager's request and authorize the purchase of five (5) -Page -boy Radio Units through the lease- purchase agree- ment with Motorola and $1700.00 be allocated for the purchase of fire hose and smoke masks from the County. Councilman Fuller seconded the motion and the vote is as follows: ,Ayes: Councilmen Byers, Fuller, Samuels and Warren Abstained: Councilman Douglass Mayor Fuller declared the motion carried. (Copy of Fire Department letter and Director of Public Safety Sustaire's l e t t e r on f i l e in the Office of the City Secretary.) XI I. PUBLIC RELATIONS PROPOSAL 237 City Manager Cowell presented a letter with three (3) proposals for Public Relations Programs submitted by Jim McMullin, a Public Relations firm in Fort Worth. Mr. Cowell stated that these services are offered to help the City handle matters ranging from news releases to the press to consultation on Bond issues. The letter and proposals explain the various charges for this firm's services and Mr. Cowell requests the Council's consideration regarding the proposal best suited to the City's needs. Mr. Cowell commented that a news letter could be sent out with the water bills. Mayor Fuller commented that he thinks that this is a good idea but he does not believe that this is the right time for consideration of the employment of a Public Relations Firm. r (Page Twelve, Regular Meeting, Euless City Council, December 13, 1966.) Councilman Samuels stated that he does not think this is the time; .that, perhaps just before another bond program, this might be advantageous-,. Mayor Fuller stated that he does not think allow - ante was made in this year's budget for these services, and that such proposals should be given serious consideration. A l l members of the Council agreed..that more thought'should be given to this matter before any action taken. XIII. DISCUSSION: SEWAGE BACKUP Mayor Fuller inquired if there were others present who des ired'to comment. Mr. 'Reagen Martin, an Attorney 'for. Mr. Montgomery stated that he was interested in the item cn the agenda. to, be _ discussed concerning handling of sewage damage 'claims. I t was recalled that" Mr. Montgomery had filed a claim against-the City in January, 1966 for sewage; back -up in his home. City Attorney 'Cribbs explained that the Council had discussed this item'in the pre - Council meeting earlier this evening; that .the City has insurance far claims of this nature and therefore, do not,consider it necessary for further discussion. Mr. Morgan thanked the Attorney for his statement and commented that he and his client were merely present to ha.ve heard any discussion which might come 'up on this matter. XIV. ADJOURNMENT Counci Irnan Fuller made the, motion to adjourn this meeting. Councilman Warren seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Fuller, Warren, Byers, Douglass and Samuel s Nays: None Mayor Fuller declared the motion carried and the meeting adjourned at 11 :30 P.M. ATTEST: APPROVED: ✓.yz -tom- Mayor