HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-02-20 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 20, 1996
MINUTES
The Pre-Commission meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to
order by Chairman Ronald Young at 5:30 p.m., in the downstairs Administration Building
Conference Room. Six members of the Planning and Zoning Commission were in
attendance.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION OF SCHEDULED ITEMS -
COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
Chairman Ronald Young opened the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at 7:07
p.m. for the consideration of scheduled items. He stated there were six members of the
Planning and Zoning Commission present. Commissioner Joy Shuler was absent.
Furthermore, the agenda for this meeting had been properly posted in accordance with
applicable law.
MEMBERS & STAFF PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Chairman Ronald Young Joy Shuler
Keith Eggers
Nancy Bright
George Zahn
Robert McMillon
Billy Owens
Randy J. Byers, Director of Public Works & Development
Paul Kruckemeyer, City Engineer
Andrea Baxter, Assistant City Engineer
Rod Tyler, City Planner
Barbara Chambers, Office Supervisor
Linda Lux, Staff Secretary
VISITORS PRESENT
Tom Cox, Director of Economic Development
Tedra Cheatham, Economic Development
Bob Welty, Rawls Welty
Robert Jebavy, Brockette/Davis/Drake
Richard Pohly, Chasemark Capital, Inc.
Fred Bowen, Chairman Zoning Board of Adjustments
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - PAGE TWO
FEBRUARY 20, 1996
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION: The Pledge of Allegiance was given by
Commissioner McMillon and the invocation was given by Commissioner Owens.
Chairman Young welcomed Fred Bowen, Chairman of the Zoning Board of Adjustments
to the P&Z meeting.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Zahn made the motion to approve the minutes of the February 6, 1996,
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and the motion was seconded by
Commissioner Eggers.
Ayes: Commissioners McMillon, Owens, Eggers, Bright, Zahn, Young
Nays: None
The motion carried.
ITEM I. FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF SPECIFIC USE PERMIT #95-29-SUP
Further consideration of a Specific Use Permit by Mr. Bob Welty, Rawls
Welty, Inc., for apartments within the CUD #754 (Community Unit
Development for multi-family dwellings with variable densities) zoning
district located on the southwest corner of Mid-Cities Boulevard and Bear
Creek Parkway
Commissioner Zahn made the motion to remove Specific Use Permit #95-29-SUP from
the table (tabled at the February 6, 1996, P&Z meeting) and seconded by Commissioner
Owens. The vote was as follows:
Ayes: Commissioners Zahn, Owens, McMillon, Bright, Young, Eggers
Nays: None
The motion carried.
Randy J. Byers, Director of Public Works and Development, introduced the Specific Use
Permit and gave the location. He stated the further consideration of this request is to
allow for the construction of luxury apartments with garages on 12.499 acres located on
the southwest corner of Mid-Cities Boulevard and Bear Creek Parkway. He stated the
applicant had submitted corrected drawings for the development. He stated staff had
reviewed the drawings and it appears to comply with the xerox copy presented at the last
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - PAGE THREE
FEBRUARY 20, 1996
meeting and the redesign of the ingress from Mid-Cities Boulevard. He stated the
Development Review Committee recommended approval.
Commissioner Zahn stated his previous concerns appeared to be corrected. The access
from Mid-Cities Boulevard had been redrawn and the Commissioners had good visibility
of the drawing. Commissioners Eggers, McMillon and Bright stated they had no further
concerns regarding the Specific Use Permit.
Commissioner Eggers made the motion to approve Specific Use Permit #95-29-SUP as
presented and the motion was seconded by Commissioner McMillon. The vote was as
follows:
Ayes: Commissioners Eggers, McMillon, Bright, Young, Owens, Zahn.
Nays: None
The motion carried.
ITEM II. FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF SITE PLAN #95-30-SP - VILLAGES OF
BEAR CREEK
Further consideration for a request of Bob Welty, Rawls Welty, Inc., for
approval of a site plan for the construction of apartments within the CUD
#754 (Community Unit Development for multi-family dwellings with variable
densities) zoning district; located on the southwest corner of Mid-Cities
Boulevard and Bear Creek Parkway
Commissioner Owens made the motion to remove Site Plan #95-30-SP from the table
(tabled at the February 6, 1996, P&Z meeting) and seconded by Commissioner Zahn.
The vote was as follows:
Ayes: Commissioners Owens, Zahn, Young, Bright, McMillon, Eggers
Nays: None
The motion carried.
Randy Byers, Director of Public Works and Development, stated this item had been
tabled at the last meeting pending corrections. DRC reviewed this submittal and are
satisfied with the corrections and recommends approval.
Commissioner Eggers had questions regarding a darkened area on the drawing. He
asked if the darkened area meant there would be a difference in the paving. Mr. Bob
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - PAGE FOUR
FEBRUARY 20, 1996
Welty stated the shaded areas, including the Mid-Cities ingress and the Bear Creek
ingress/egress are enhanced paving to dress up the entrances. The texture and color will
be different.
Commissioner Owens stated he appreciated the work that has been done by staff and
the applicant. However, he did not feel the applicant had come far enough or taken the
Commissions' deliberations seriously enough. He stated he still had concerns regarding
the openings on Mid-Cities, drainage and the stucco/plaster for the exterior of the
buildings. Commissioner Owens stated he felt the applicant could have a higher and
better looking project if they used brick. In addition, he felt that less roofing exposure
would look better.
Chairman Young stated for the record, he did not share Commissioner Owens' concerns
regarding the driveway from Mid-Cities Boulevard.
Commissioner Bright stated she had seen the project in Valley Ranch and thought it
looked nice. She stated it was an upscale looking project that is still under construction,
but the first units are occupied. This is a 440 unit property. Mr. Welty stated they have
used similar exterior materials on other (Dallas, Plano, Mid-Cities area) apartments and
they have resisted the weather well. Mr. Welty stated over the past 20 years, his firm
has designed and overseen approximately 40,000 apartment units.
Paul Kruckemeyer, City Engineer, told the Commissioners the applicants had worked well
with the Engineering Department and he recommended approval of the Site Plan.
Commissioner Eggers asked what the procedure was for spreading on the stucco exterior
material. Mr. Welty stated the material was spread on by hand over metal lath. The
technical term for this process is Exterior Insulated Finishing System instead of the old
term "stucco". Mr. Welty stated this process is a two coat system. Commissioner Owens
stated he did not have a problem with stucco on apartment buildings, he just did not feel
like it was for an upscale project. He stated when it came to a Specific Use Permit he
would like to see brick used. Mr. Welty stated that 90% of upscale apartment projects
being built in Los Colinas, Valley Ranch and Plano are using the stucco exterior.
Commissioner Zahn made the motion to approve Site Plan #95-30-SP as presented. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner McMillon. The vote was as follows:
Ayes: Commissioners Zahn, McMillon, Bright, Young, Eggers
Nays: None
Abstention: Commissioner Owens
The motion carried.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - PAGE FIVE
FEBRUARY 20, 1996
ITEM III. LAND PLAN #P-95-23 - VILLAGES OF BEAR CREEK
Request of Mr. Robert Jebavy, Brockette/Davis/Drake, Inc., for approval of
a Land Plan for 12.499 acres out of the R. Crowley Survey, A-312 and S.
Tucker Survey, A-1512; located on the southwest corner of Mid-Cities
Boulevard and Bear Creek Parkway
Randy J. Byers, Director of Public Works and Development, introduced the Land Plan for
Villages of Bear Creek and gave the general location. He stated the land plan had been
submitted in general conformance with the Unified Development Code. He stated it had
been reviewed by the Development Review Committee and found that it met the
applicability ordinance and therefore, they recommended approval.
Chairman Young stated the reason for the name difference between the land plan and
site plan was that Mr. Jebavy was working on the platting and engineering portion of the
project and Mr. Welty is the architect.
Mr. Robert Jebavy, 4144 N. Central Expressway, Suite 1100, Dallas, Texas, introduced
himself and was present to answer questions from the Commissioners.
Commissioner Eggers had questions regarding the storm water runoff. He referenced Mr.
Jebavy's letter to Andrea Baxter, Assistant City Engineer, dated February 12, 1996. He
stated the letter indicated three options for the storm water runoff. Commissioner Eggers
asked the applicant to expand on the options. Mr. Jebavy stated they were in discussion
with the property owner on the other side of Hill Trail and their engineer. Mr. Jebavy has
provided them with various flows (Q25 Q100) they would like to transport across the
roadway. The approach they are taking is to collect the entire 100 year frequency storm
before it gets to the roadway and upsize the existing storm sewer across from Hill Trail
to a capacity that would carry the water over to their property. Mr. Jebavy stated it was
up to the other property owner as to how they get the water across their property. He
discussed several methods including sheet flowing and piping across the other property.
Mr. Jebavy informed the Commission they expect to get a response from the property
owner next week and their design will reflect whichever method they choose.
Commissioner Eggers stated, as a citizen of Euless, he was most concerned with the
condition of Bear Creek. He said trees are being lost because of the conditions of the
banks and he had concerns with the creek taking more water. Commissioner McMillon
had the same concerns and how the park and sidewalks would be affected.
Paul Kruckemeyer, City Engineer, stated his number one option would be to put the water
in a pipe and take it to the creek. However, according to the UDC, the applicant has the
option to look at other options for their final solutions. Mr. Kruckemeyer stated the final
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - PAGE SIX
FEBRUARY 20, 1996
decision would not be left up to the applicant. They would have to submit it to the City's
Engineering Department. If the Engineering Department had a problem with it, they
would take it to the Development Review Committee for review. He stated they would
not let the water go across the top of the ground and wipe out the trail system down
stream.
Commissioners Owens and Zahn felt the first choice would be the pipe preference.
Commissioner Owens stated the underground pipe system seems to be the most
workable solution. Commissioner Zahn asked if the Commission had the right to specify
the underground system. Mr. Kruckemeyer informed the Commissioners that this solution
was the most expensive way of handling the water since there were two offsite property
owners that might restrict the shortest route to the channel. He stated the offsite property
owner will probably be hesitant where he wants to put the water because it will restrict
his ability to develop his property at a later date, especially if it is put underground in a
pipe. Mr. Kruckemeyer stated he thought the underground pipe would be the best
solution, but he would like to be able to assure the applicant they could go straight to the
creek with the water also, instead of routing it an additional thousand feet out of the way
to appease an offsite property owner.
Commissioner Owens stated he wanted the applicant on record stating they were
satisfied and understood the City Engineer's recommendations (that he preferred the
underground pipe), then he would vote for the project. The applicant stated yes and he
would work with the Engineering Department.
Commissioner Owens made the motion to approve Land Plan #P-95-23 - Oakmont of
Bear Creek and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Eggers. The vote was as
follows:
Ayes: Commissioners Owens, Eggers, Bright, Young, McMillon, Zahn
Nays: None
The motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:46 P.M.
Chairman Ronald Young / )date
022096mn.P&Z
�F