The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1996-03-05 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MARCH 5, 1996 MINUTES The Pre-Commission meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairman Ronald Young at 5:30 p.m., in the downstairs Administration Building Conference Room. Five members of the Planning and Zoning Commission were in attendance. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION OF SCHEDULED ITEMS - COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Chairman Ronald Young opened the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at 7:07 p.m. for the consideration of scheduled items. He stated there were five members of the Planning and Zoning Commission present. Commissioners McMillon and Bright were absent. Furthermore, the agenda for this meeting had been properly posted in accordance with applicable law. MEMBERS & STAFF PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Chairman Ronald Young Robert McMillon Keith Eggers Nancy Bright George Zahn Joy Shuler Billy Owens Bo Bass, Deputy Director of Development Paul Kruckemeyer, City Engineer Andrea Baxter, Assistant City Engineer Rod Tyler, City Planner Barbara Chambers, Office Supervisor Linda Lux, Staff Secretary VISITORS PRESENT Council Member Charlie Miller Council Member Katy Edwards Tom Cox, Director of Economic Development Tedra Cheatham, Economic Development Tina Harrison Leon Baze John Baze Robert Jebavy PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - PAGE TWO MARCH 5, 1996 VISITORS PRESENT CONTINUED Rick Simmons, Western Rim, Inc. Mark Humphries, Humphries Arch., Inc. Mike Clark PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION: The Pledge of Allegiance was given by Commissioner Owens and the invocation was given by Commissioner Shuler. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Owens made the motion to approve the minutes of the February 20, 1996, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Eggers. Ayes: Commissioners Owens, Eggers, Shuler, Zahn, Young Nays: None The motion carried. r.. ITEM I. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING CASE #96-01 - MANSIONS BY THE VINEYARDS Request of Western Rim Investment Advisor, Inc., for a change in zoning on 14.902 acres out of the Levi Franklin Survey, A-513, from its present zoning of C-2 (Community Business District) and CUD #768 (Community Unit Development - R-5 at 21.5 units/acre) to R-5 (Multi-family dwelling district at 24 units/acre); located on the east side of North Industrial Boulevard, 1500 feet north of Cheek Sparger Road/Mid-Cities Boulevard Bo Bass, Deputy Director of Development, explained the request of Zoning Case#96-01 and gave the general location. He stated the Development Review Committee had reviewed the request and recommended its approval. Chairman Young explained the rules governing a Public Hearing and then opened the Public Hearing. He called for the applicant to make a presentation. Rick Simmons, represented Western Rim Investment Advisors, Inc., and stated their concept was a high end, luxury apartment. It was important for the applicant to have some sort of access and ingress/egress from Hwy. 121. He stated they had not PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - PAGE THREE MARCH 5, 1996 increased the density on property which is currently zoned for a density of 21.5 units per acre. They are putting in 259 units, which is inclusive of all of the property, instead of the allowable 289 units. Mr. Simmons stated there were several luxury amenities, including the following: the entrance, a 3 acre oak grove at the back of the property, fully attached garages as part of the structures, 7 units per building, clubhouse, swimming pool, sports court, two story units and many other amenities. Mr. Simmons introduced Mark Humphries from Humphries Architect, Inc. Mr. Humphries stated the design of the building elevations were to give the appearance of a 3,500 sq. ft. house in the middle of a subdivision. He stated the look of the building elevation would be consistent throughout the complex. Mr. Simmons stated the market trend supports the need for this type of project. He passed out a list of the amenities to the Commissioners. Chairman Young called for any other proponents of the zoning change. There being none, he called for any member of the audience that was opposed to the zoning change and give their reasons. Mr. Leon Baze, 3411 Marsh Lane, Grapevine, Texas stated he did not have a complaint against the project, but he did have some questions. He stated his family owns the 75 acres estate property immediately east and adjoining the proposed site. He had NNW questions regarding property values, what type of apartments were being constructed and how close to his property. Mr. Baze also wanted some clarification regarding his fence line. Tina Harrison, 604 Midway, asked the applicant if the units would be accessible to the disabled. Mr. Humphries stated that all of the one story units would be accessible to the disabled which is a requirement of the Fair Housing Act. They will have 2'-10" doors on all ground floor units in addition to the driveways and sidewalks having the appropriate ramps. Mr. Humphries also informed Mr. Baze that the apartments were total luxury apartments and he also would be concerned if low-income/government assisted housing was being proposed. He assured Mr. Baze that the apartments were not a tax credit situation. He stated the rental range would be from $840 for a one bedroom up to $1,695 for the largest unit. Chairman Young closed the Public Hearing for discussion among the Commissioners. Commissioners Zahn, Owens, Shuler, Eggers and Young all stated they had no problems with the zoning change request. Commissioner Owens explained the reason for Specific Use Permits is that the City PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - PAGE FOUR MARCH 5, 1996 Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission, along with city staff, has said that all apartments will have to come before these bodies to approve what is happening prior to building apartments. Commissioner Shuler made the motion to approve Zoning Case #96-01 from C-2 and CUD 768 to R-5 (Multi-Family dwelling district at 24/units acre). The motion was seconded by Commissioner Zahn. The vote was as follows: Ayes: Commissioners Shuler, Zahn, Owens, Young, Eggers Nays: None The motion carried. ITEM II. PUBLIC HEARING - SPECIFIC USE PERMIT #96-03-SUP - MANSIONS BY THE VINEYARDS Request of Western Rim Investment Advisors, Inc., for apartments to be constructed within the R-5 (Multi-Family dwelling district at 24 units/acre) zoning district; located on the east side of North Industrial Boulevard, 1500 feet north of Cheek Sparger Road/Mid-Cities Boulevard Bo Bass, Deputy Director of Development, gave the general location and stated the Development Review Committee had reviewed this request and recommended the approval of the Specific Use Permit. Chairman Young explained the rules governing a Public Hearing and then opened the Public Hearing for Case #96-03-SUP. He called for anyone in the audience that would like to speak as a proponent or opponent. There being none he closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Bass explained that City Council has mandated to the Unified Development Control Document that all multi-family projects require a Specific Use Permit overlay. The zoning is in place in terms of R-5 to allow multi-family, however the SUP is an additional check and balance to be guaranteed that the Site Plan review occurs and an area of negotiations can occur. He reviewed the thirteen (13) Specific Use Permit evaluation criteria. He also stated that the Development Review Committee had determined that the thirteen evaluation criteria had been met. Commissioner Eggers stated he had concerns about the fencing on the detail drawing. He stated he did not feel the fencing was adequate, especially along the backside of the property because the existing barbed wire fence was not consistent with an upscale PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - PAGE FIVE MARCH 5, 1996 project. He asked the applicant to address this issue and explain their plan for fencing. Rick Simmons stated they are reluctant to commit to a fence until they know what type fencing to use. He stated he had submitted a copy of a letter that committed to a fence on three sides of the property with the exception of the area separating the Baze property. In addition, Mr. Simmons committed to putting up a wrought iron fence in place of the barbed wire fence between the proposed development and the Baze property that would be consistent with the other fencing. Mr. Simmons committed for the record to show that he will fence with wrought iron fencing around the complete perimeter of the property. There will be fencing between Buildings #14 and #15 instead of along the perimeter because of the natural ravine. Paul Kruckemeyer, City Engineer, stated he was satisfied with the Specific Use Permit and satisfied with the location of the drainage and utility easements. Commissioner Owens stated the applicant had made a very good case and had a good product. He felt there had been some good discussions between the applicant and city staff prior to the presentation to the Commission. He stated he wanted the record to reflect that the applicant has committed to building the product on the ground as was shown on his elevation drawing. Chairman Young pointed out to Mr. Baze and his family that one of the features on the Site Plan showed the City is proposing (in the Thoroughfare Plan) a roadway to be placed within the 100' easement for the power lines, that would provide additional buffer between the development and the remaining part of their property. This will call for two twenty-four foot roadways; one lane north bound and one lane south bound. He stated this roadway was not part of the applicants plan or request. Commissioner Owens asked the developer if he was making a commitment to maintain the swale. Mr. Simmons stated he was making a commitment to handle erosion control and maintenance on the swale. Commissioner Eggers made the motion to approve Specific Use Permit#96-03-SUP with the attached qualifications: that a wrought iron fence and/or good quality fence on all four sides of the property as committed to by the developer be installed. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Owens. The vote was as follows: Commissioner Owens stated he did not want the City of Euless to have to pay for all of the roadway and the property owners to the east. He had questions regarding the escrow of the monies and asked if this subject should become a part of the motion. Chairman Young stated this was not an appropriate time to make this a part of the motion. Chairman Young stated it would be proper for the City Engineer to clarify. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - PAGE SIX MARCH 5, 1996 Paul Kruckemeyer stated the property or the development will be escrowed the estimated cost for their portion of paving cost. Ayes: Commissioners Eggers, Owens, Shuler, Young, Zahn Nays: None The motion carried. ITEM III. SITE PLAN #96-02-SP - MANSIONS BY THE VINEYARDS Request of Western Rim Investment Advisors, Inc., for approval of a site plan for the construction of apartments within the R-5 (Multi-family dwelling district at 24 units/acre) zoning district; located on the east side of North Industrial Boulevard, 1500 feet north of Cheek Sparger Road/Mid-Cities Boulevard Bo Bass, Deputy Director of Development, introduced the Site Plan request and stated the Development Review Committee had reviewed the site plan and found the information provided to be consistent with the zoning and subdivision regulations of the UDC and therefore, recommended its approval. He stated the purpose of the site plan was to verify code compliance with legislative intent of the UDC. Paul Kruckemeyer, City Engineer, stated he felt the applicant had done a good job on the site plan. Mr. Kruckemeyer stated it was the applicant's idea to do the phasing on the drainage. He stated the applicant was aware and agreed to provide documentation regarding drainage maintenance requirements and as well as the documents from the commercial property land owner about the intent of installing the phase two section at a later date. Commissioner Owens made the motion to approve Site Plan#96-02-SP with the following exceptions: all of the memorandums passed out by the applicant be made a part of the motion. This will include three memorandums: 1.) Memo dated 3-4-96 concerning automobile parking/garages & storage; 2.) Memo concerning fencing; and 3.) an approved (by the City Engineer's office) Memorandum of Agreement. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Eggers. The vote was as follows: Ayes: Commissioners Owens, Eggers, Shuler, Young, Zahn Nays: none The motion carried. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - PAGE SEVEN MARCH 5, 1996 ITEM IV. LAND PLAN #P-96-03 - MANSIONS BY THE VINEYARDS Request of Charles C. Yang for approval of a Land Plan for 19.190 acres out of the Levi Franklin Survey, A-513; located on the east side of North Industrial Boulevard, 1500 feet north of Cheek Sparger Road/Mid-Cities Boulevard Bo Bass, Deputy Director of Development, introduced the land plan and stated the Development Review Committee had reviewed the request and found that it met the applicability ordinance and therefore, recommended approval. Michael Clark, represented the applicant, Mr. Yang. He stated the Land Plan was being presented in conjunction with the Site Plan. Paul Kruckemeyer, City Engineer, stated he felt the provisions for utility and drainage layouts were satisfactory. He commented there would be some trees removed because of a water line along the east side. He stated the Engineering Department was pleased with their design. Mr. Kruckemeyer also stated for the record that he reserved the right to make some clarifications on the verbiage of the Memorandum of Agreement. He wanted more descriptive wording on the memorandum. He stated there may be the possibility of some off-site drainage easements. Mr. Kruckemeyer informed the applicant if he could get the velocity down to a non-erosive velocity and where the channel will handle the volume and do it within their property line, then so be it. But it might have to extend off-site because the applicant has not proceeded far enough into the drainage design to know yet. Commissioner Owens stated he thought the staff had already studied the Memorandum of Agreement that was handed out by the applicant. He stated he did not want to make it a part of the previous motion because of the drainage and the portion that is going to be commercial will be retained by the seller, etc. Chairman Young stated he did not feel this would have a bearing on the previous motion. Mr. Kruckemeyer concurred. Commissioner Zahn made the motion to approve Land Plan#P-96-03 as presented. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Shuler. The vote was as follows: Ayes: Commissioners Zahn, Shuler, Owens, Young, Eggers Nays: None The motion carried PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - PAGE EIGHT MARCH 5, 1996 ITEM V. PRELIMINARY PLAT #P-96-05 - LOT 2, BLOCK 4, OAKWOOD ACRES ESTATES Request of South West Properties, L.P., for a preliminary plat of 3.854 acres out of the Ray Shelton Subdivision; located on the east side of North Main Street and 1400 feet north of Harwood Road Bo Bass, Deputy Director of Development, stated the Development Review Committee had reviewed the preliminary plat and appeared to meet the minimum requirements set forth in the City of Euless' Unified Development Code and therefore, recommended approval. Chairman Young stated the approval of a Preliminary Plat was a ministerial function and did not require a presentation from the applicant. He asked if the Commissioners had questions regarding the preliminary plat. Commissioner Eggers made the motion to approve Preliminary Plat #P-96-05 as presented. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Owens. The vote was as follows: AMP, Ayes: Commissioner Eggers, Owens, Shuler, Young, Zahn Nays: None The motion carried. ITEM VI REPORTS The Commissioners were reminded of the Development Activity Report in their packet which shows the activity of ongoing development within the City. Chairman Young thanked Council Member Miller for being present and he welcomed Council Member Edwards to her first P&Z meeting. ADJOURNMENT: There being no urther business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:28 P.M. 7',m% " , 9�9� C airman Ronald Young ['ate 030596mn.P&z U W R Western Rim I A Investment Advisors, Inc. Investment Advisors and Portfolio Managers T 3ne (714) 955-6565 LAKESHORE TOWERS Tel"6pier (714) 955-6575 18101 Von !Carman Avenue, Suite 1260/12th Floor Irvine, California 92715 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commissio • :: '," y Co . I ty of Euless, Texas FROM Marcus D. Hiles, President pirt�N � ;_u W RE: The Mansions by the Vineyard - Proposed 259 Unit Super Premium Quality Apartment Community DATE: March 4, 1996 Per the community rules and regulations of The Mansions by the Vineyard, all residents must park their automobiles inside their garage at all times. The rules and regulations do not permit parking in visitor spaces. The rules and regulations are legally part of each Lease Agreement and the resident is evicted for repeat non-compliance. Additionally, we do not permit boat and/or other storage in the garages unless the resident owns less automobiles than garage spaces. The rules are enforced daily by our contract towing company. Each resident has a resident decal on their car with a coded number that identifies their unit number. All visitors receive a coded visitor pass. This policy allows for easy and daily enforcement. This procedure has been a great success at many of our communities. r.. W R Western Rim A Investment Advisors, Inc. Investment Advisors and Portfolio Managers T 3ne (714) 955-6565 LAKESHORE TOWERS TAIII5pler (714) 955-6575 18101 Von Kaman Avenue, Suite 1260/12th Floor Irvine, California 92715 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission ansl nc. of the City of Euless, Texas FROM: Marcus D. Hiles, Presic n T to* RE: The Mansions by _— Proposed 259 Unit "Super Premium" Apartment Community (Community Fencing) DATE: March 4, 1996 We will place an appealing/high quality ornamental wrought iron fence of at least 6' in height r,.. around the entire perimeter of the project in two (2)phases. Phase I will be all untreed areas which is all areas except the southeast quadrant of the site during construction. Phase II would be built by The Mansions by the Vineyard at its sole cost and expense if and when the City road on the east boundary line is built. The purpose of this phasing is to preserve the natural landscape and as many of the beautiful 100 year old oak trees in the southeast quadrant of the property for as long as possible. M - 4 -96 MOM 1 7 : 52 p g 2 • MAR 04 '96 1550 P.1 • `a = • MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT THE LAND OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY CHARLES YANG MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED ON THE ATTACHED SURVEY AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION. The Purchaser of the above described property and Seller hereby agree to the following; 1. A "draw" or drainage ditch exists in the middle of the proposed western portion of the southern property tine. 2. The Purchaser has applied to The City of Euless to rezone the north-western portion of the tract from commercial to multi-family. 3. The Purchaser and Seller understand that The City of Euless will require"draw" or drainage ditch in the area shown on the attached survey to be piped in concrete at some future date. 4. The Seller agrees he will,at Seller's sole cost and expense,install a 60 inch concrete pipe as currently shown on the Exhibit for Specific Use Permit #96-03-SUP when and only If and when Seller of Seller's successor or assigns elect to develop and build out the commercial portion retained by Seller and shown on the attached survey. 5, This Agreement and any document or other legal instrument requested by The City of Euless shall run with the land and be a sole eee obligation and cost of Seller or its successor or assigns. 6. The existing drainage ditch or "draw" will remain in its current state and general appearance until Seller or its successor or assigns elect to develop the commercial portion retained by Seller as shown on the attached survey. Buyer agrees to provide to Seller,at no cost, an easement for the proposed storm drain pipe as described in#3 above,and a construction easement as necessary. 7. Buyer agrees to complete an erosion control plan and maintenance agreement to The City of Euless at its sole cost and expense and maintain the existing drainage ditch or "draw" until the commercial parcel is developed by Seller or its successor assigns, 8. Buyer further agrees that upon construction of its project,it will construct a "dividing" fence between the Buyer's and the Seller's property at no cost to Seller as required by The City of Euless. Should there be a further requirement to construct a "dividing" fence along the easement "draw" area after the Seller installs the concrete pipe, the Buyer agrees to build said fence at no cost to Seller. • SELLER / arifti_CharlPS C. Yang and K On Chau Yanq a„..4 estor 1, Y'' _ l,F� a Nevada Limited •artnershlp Eule.s 121 Asrociatata (J w �. Date Date F El; 1 b-1'�yb 1 c 1 W 1 NKELNHNN 8, HSSUC. 214 490 7099 P.02/06 (1(0 6101\15 L�� - T 19D FIELD NOTE DESCRIPTION TRACT 1 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT § BEING a tract of land situated in the LEVI FRANKLIN SURVEY, Abstract No. 513, City of Euless,Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of land conveyed to Euless 121 Associates recorded in Volume 09431, Page 1729 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas (DRTCT) being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2 inch iron rod set for corner in the easterly right-of-way line of STATE HIGHWAY 121 and STATE HIGHWAY 157 (variable width right-of-way) said point being the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 2,834.79 feet, a chord bearing North 11 °12'10" East, a chord distance of 131.65 feet; THENCE along the easterly right-of-way line of said STATE HIGHWAY 121 and STATE HIGHWAY 157 as follows: Continuing along said curve to the right through a central angle of 02°39'40" for an arc length of 131.66 feet to a brass cap monument found for the beginning of a non- tangent curve to the right having a radius of 11,689.16 feet and having a chord bearing of North 12°18'23"East and a chord length of 82.80 feet; Continuing along said non-tangent curve to the right through a central angle of 00°24'21 "and a arc length of 82.80 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE departing the easterly right-of-way line of said STATE HIGHWAY 121 and STATE HIGHWAY 157 North 89°21'00" East, a distance of 1,047.47 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found for corner in the westerly right-of-way line of a TP&L Easement (100 foot right-of-way) recorded in Volume 1349, Page 137 and Volume 2126, Page 341 (DRTCT); THENCE along the westerly right-of-way line of said TP&L Easement, South 00°26'15"East, a distance of 377.20 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE departing the westerly right-of-way of said TP&l. Easement,South 89°21 '35"West, a distance of 699.03 feet to a 1 inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE North 21 °25'40" East, a distance of 33.06 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE North 68°50'26"West, a distance of 99.01 feet to a % inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE North 57°41'17"West, a distance of 201 .61 feet to a Y2 inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE South 85°32'40"West, a distance of 144.32 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING within these metes and bounds 8.208 acres or 357,529 square feet of land, more or less. Fhtf-lb-1 b 12: 1J WINKELMHNN A HSSUL. 214 490 7099 P.03/06 FIELD NOTE DESCRIPTION TRACT 2 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEING a tract of land situated in the LEVI FRANKLIN SURVEY, Abstract No. 513, City of Euless, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of land conveyed to Charles C. Yang and Kon Chau Yang as recorded in Volume 09431, Page 1742 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas (DRTCT) and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a 1/2 inch iron rod set for corner in the easterly right-of-way line of STATE HIGHWAY 121 and STATE HIGHWAY 157 (variable width right-of-way); THENCE departing the eatserly right-of-way line of said STATE HIGHWAY 121 and STATE HIGHWAY 157, North 85°32'40"East, a distance of 144.32 feet to a Y2 inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE South 57041'17"East, a distance of 201.61 feet to a Y2 inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE South 68°50'26"East, a distance of 99.01 feet to a Y2 inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE South 21 °25'40"West, a distance of 33.06 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 89°21'35" East, a distance of 699.03 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found for corner in the westerly right-fo-way line of a TP&L Easement (100 foot right-of-way) recorded in Volume 1349, Page 137 and Volume 2126, page 341 (DRTCT); THENCE along the westerly right-of-way line of said TP&L Easement, South 00°07'10"East, a distance of 376.75 feet to a 3/8 inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE departing the westerly right-of-way of said TP&L Easement, South 89°20'30"west, a distance of 848.44 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE North 21 °25'40" East, a distance of 406.81 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING within these metes and bounds 6.694 acres or 291,585 square feet of land, more or less. r�tb l0 177b 1 G• 17 W I NKLLVIHNN 6 H5UL. 214 490 7099 P.04/06 FIELD NOTE DESCRIPTION TRACT 3 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT `'.• BEING a tract of land situated in the LEVI FRANKLIN SURVEY, Abstract No. 513, City of Euless,Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of land conveyed to Euless 121 Associates recorded in Volume 09431,Page 1729 and a portion of land conveyed to Charles C. Yang and Kon Chau Yang as recorded in Volume 09431, Page 1742 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas (DRTCT) and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2 inch iron rod set for corner in the easterly right-of-way line of STATE HIGHWAY 121 and STATE HIGHWAY 157 (variable width right-of-way) said point being the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 2,834.79 feet, a chord bearing North 11 °12'10" East, a chord distance of 131.65 feet; THENCE along the easterly right-of-way line of said STATE HIGHWAY 121 and STATE HIGHWAY 157 as follows: Continuing along said curve to the right through a central angle of 02°39'40"for an arc length of 131.66 feet to a brass cap monument found for the beginning of a non- tangent curve to the right having a radius of 11,689.16 feet, a chord bearing North 12°18'23" East, a chord distance of 82.80 feet; Continuing along said non-tangent curve to the right through a central angle of 00°24'21"for an arc length of 82.80 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE departing the easterly right-of-way line of said STATE HIGHWAY 121 and STATE HIGHWAY 157 North 89°21'00" East, a distance of 1,047.47 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found for corner in the westerly right-of-way line of a TP&L Easement (100 foot right-of-way) recorded in Volume 1349, Page 137 and Volume 2126, Page 341 (DRTCT); THENCE along the westerly right-of-way line of said TP&L Easement as follows: South 00°26'15"East, a distance of 377.20 feet to a 112 inch iron rod set for corner; South 00°07'10" East, a distance of 376.75 feet to a 3/8 inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE departing the westerly right-of-way of said TP&L Easement, South 89°20'30"West, a distance of 848.44 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE North 21 °25'40" East, a distance of 439.87 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE North 68°50'26"West, a distance of 99.01 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE North 57°41'17" West, a distance of 201 .61 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE South 85°32'40"West, a distance of 144.32 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING within these metes and bounds 14.902 acres or 649,114 square feet of land, more or less. • �- - - -�- �� -�. WII11 LLI 1171 ill , I-1J JUL. J4 4JU '(L1 P.05/06 N "m° CO il' i.7•►. API .1.PW ry Mty W.f w ..1...1M -/ M A•1■1•,w1 10 PROW,PRPLJtT• STAR Of Mai N 011.11 1... Cd1PIlY 0i lARRART N 1'••0•G•n W•• CO 0•■• •1 AO -•Canto** 119:11 1L..O•i•.t.t U.r auto . 100 50 0 100 200 lY Cis•.` C•11•a TM•.. 1.... .v..• s:*7"'1,00•011.;944:)•.s �6-fir p ' ••+6 f.M• ewv A sr em-s•.m1 6CC*11.G•1••1/7 1...i. I.-100' OF •M R.•/w ••O••••121..•SSA1L MO .•s •.wN•SO r w•en•MP. 7,71,,....1 GK.one anM•Ails alin:CD:: IOCATgR YA► I,CL 3J t .1 0.11 MAI•I••s•4 t •• EMI SfAA 1...*N•3+.w r.l, 13ui"SYC..t...•t X11\)/��f p ��/ ) Cent*A*Oa*to*• ... i�I N 1�k 7� il( i W•Arc>••q*•1 X 1 _ U.W.Af M••MnRMym° v i V` ��OA y " I I iw•+1M i•6•U7 w , WW r WOW c • 11.747 Y I e,' .. .i77ao hit ei A.ii4•17Mw'0 0••••.. • 0•1....M 677.0)1••1 1•. new/•••e•2175'41 L.• T 1 1I ' PI•.1.wane... I = 1200 ACRES 11(1001 PI...S7.rIr h.. mow' V I n'QQ S..P War.O.W If M.P. `Ct.� TRACT 3 ... .. t (0/1111k90-:41, tri 14.902 ACRES nas a �� :was i^,� Jr �«: -0.0._r 6y let sT.a0i NUS 1 •.• r I MOM Or 1MRryrt • �a[ Z 00.0••D'•Ct d...•.hwN V L....4 TV•MI C4..xi,1...1 •n '' " `''1 Q x1 v- Al' S TRACT 2 K ., C0•00•12•4 5eV'1 O•1/2 Oe1. "' =n" 6.691 ACRES 41: 1.OU.AT 121 w STAR.•o 6 1 N.C.`°-_J° 1."�►..1 )i ▪ t p(3)--h,,A. rc1 •4 • . :.�Y.10,2.0 13 i *•r •+ *mot cna sw*ar,tir c•n =K ct incac.wwso7s c.1 R` % M•.CC S*1.2/77'W •..1 4M_ v° I.O.fl PIMP*071-10'UK w we.•AM7•011-•t-.iy •� ....^.V.�Cy.:� r 13H..5s*27 N Ww•.i. mgxeg A i�a .i f wiOW• • 1 ,, AM**M 37{.75/••1 N• iI 1.C.CC••••1w 3* 0001m...1 6•4N 1..1 M. +..1 •i� AIEPIO[NMP?mow ism, COUi•••••C.Is*0.......e WAVE TABLE noon.....UOR - WRVS RA01JS DELTA TANGENT LENGTH C/1710 OFARNG At.O.Ah1). .'i.•M•.L.r••.t •'A•••n I1 b---'•wt.RN. 3. C-1 263&79' 0739'•0' 6S!A' 131.66' 131.65' )1 111 Y o..+•rw7••.d 1M.... - � •y 4.w• L Si.L C-Z 11369.16' Opy4'21' 41.40' 62.60' 2 0'E Th...►K1•••.e•7 4.....1.1..xµ.Pe SC.... R•a Vr. 62.60' 74 126'23'I t#..,s}cl rwq 4tw.k.:Nw SOUL C .wy.•.•.«at 0.1....4144 v•• ...■■•a.600-7r•a..••.d•. 7 90'd 10101 P M i N Ir If 4 I! n axs++lo. Tao•rR o(su•1o.1 > >} 9 *KT, � TWO 3 STAR Q Q TAMMY COtN TT `] •••Ws T.•..OM ARK7•555•.1 5..31S q•N 65.1.5.5aa r w.n...t..M.s.tl1.I•A••CO Su..RT.ASwr-tt Ms al 04 N 5.•••r....M Ma.ar...1.M N W •121 A.rrr/w (_4 Uwe.Cowan T..W aW.•"who N M.• th Amc•• 721 s as 0.4 Raw.M Ywawa C.wl%Taw MOOT) ••••• M Woe.'05.11.Pere 1521•M•N•tin N b••0•.555 t Penn C.a. Woos e•. R ..s 1•..G.. .are..L 11151.1 00.1,11.6.1).7 V W D.55 1p...r 1 •••• >a•.1511 0.t1..•p1•4' -11-.•5 71...11 STAR C••ii/71 T1...10175+1...•i.e.......flrwr 550.0..1111... 137 150.1..• A.M-.I• .w.paint•.Le a. 1129.14•6 r•1/2 ae►>•.r•.•.t•r NM.'w t••.4551.5 r 1.55. `•-1..ww d 2.153.» •e1.5.571, wrw 550111.121..s OTAI(Mp.•T 137 .•5011 041.2•4•4-.0 w N.STATE .w 001.1••-1 w 131.13+..c r.�AAwr M••rw N tA•A•• 131...••p M 1115»4.1•....WI.1.n s-.s.W M W STAR 1.141552 171.•/SUN WW1 Es*••.r.sd••r M t3t.rs 1w2 11215th e.q P.p..17 1'1-0-•./w of p.e lust MOw.AT 121 w S7Al2 ^+r 1110117AT 137 is•••.y. _ M 0.,lo*511..1.•an►e eye M 11771. 1511 11.•14 7....w.w/5555.411 ow•..1..1.,of•...-1.T.. O••••••••t....4 awl•is a..,st a7..•A•.wt a wog of 0175.5 111 w ft..Of M.**.1•lest•••••••••u..• M....w rya d 12.1D Met 5..�y 4 usa d 171,15 11551 N•"owe o otr 1,.0.•.55 4.. 1.11 or••5.1•o•0 N••a•-4TpaH aegis N C .y ow. •0e.e. .r IM h 1..t•1.111•....r 1115 w•••away N a..y.l•-••I••155555..y.r 007.•h• 122172'5.115 •1.f 51.1..0.M 6210 1551' at N•Sp•115•.A...1.,../w..1.a T+'•s•1•M Mry•s . ..5r.M an N 155 1 s.. •a.awo•ow 4 . 00I•'31-+.a n .1. d 12 60 1•.t N•3/6 q rr...•w Mr sr r. •t-✓-+�w tr..t.loot 5501500 1r�si•1t ..Plain N I.p.)..7 1555 M•3/5 taw•••M Mw..a WAKE djy a• Ws STAR M0a A■121...STAR G Us 9IM of•T•it t Lrap•(100 4.t rlra.N...p)wawa.'i. •14••••13)gaol.UT'Or"TIT•47•10.[•N t.W7.A7 MM N•2/6 nn>w n.1.04 z ? a 2526.P•• y.1(OR7CTk I*s...0.a.at.. Apt-N-•••W•••T••1 lie -.a(10 55.1 hM-•1-..)wan. a j +--n W✓sie•p 1.11.1.-.1355.Pw.13•)15 1.5.....1155 0511.3.1(062 u . •t L••.•-.•t 51.15 0221'13 1•.t• 4 �> he.•w M•w W v-M 11010•.w•.1•-is .17 Ar.MN-..5 t1.•N•N T••L L...w.N r I.•... gt K �z •r...•r .. o w.N...e r.•i ••L Gr.+.l. « 6r7t7'1. • 007152'5..t.•M755.20 N N•t/2 1.•M •...t w. .�M.1. .•• z Y Sow"0007'10'Eat•4w•.•.M 371.73 1W t..3/1 0.5 h•..a4 1.1.•W • , a i N •.1.p M 73015.1 M•I/2.d,sr a.M..s.nr, M..1. PIO LOC.: 4 ...we N 1101 41.1.•5/2.w1.F1...•sot w.a..% .two•d T1 ..•••n•.M•••1•12. nd. •)N•r•T••t C•••-1.i a sr7030' 2 51 • 0epee. a•.•fp5 a.w r pt 1.,v.1..207.111 hot N•Ih 1.Pew N Mr M-1. g z§_ NI...r 1..31 1551 1.•.•0C.T d 1120 ...Q TAR r1.71za•.V Cat.•thts••.M.21.15 1..•N•1/2 A s..a..✓tr Y y 0 •51151.4 1700•o.•1 3)7.326•t.•a AM N M..0...•••• PRMQ 1.ra N707C si.l•MI..N 0.01 I•••N•1/3•••i1.ro.w•W...-r. •N'e 1•uOE Mrs ST•11T 1.1.15..4.••• r 301.14 A..,..1/1 i.r.e....•not a. *VW. WAGE 3.0 601740-...1..1.1...r,...)2/.r N a.Pb..!OF 120..0.2t 2021.042.V•4 a••.••t• N r•wr 14.102 woo or•41,11.55•.15 M.t d 1...4 a.. .tam • '0[2 •00. ACT 1 Y LEM 5.14 00/11/1"E".•ct••tl 1.5 313.p)M 1.2...Pew d 1.4 c1... M G.M.C.T..•W to. 01.31.hr.5741 M l..0.•Newt.M T...at Ca., 1501552•...N.•••Mu-. /•.1 r. ■•• .M.141.15.400■.I...,...N STATE > 137(.1570255 1..a h••1-.1-.N2 Ce 1_1.1 '•t_.•5 w..5 STer,055•2 121.M STAR LL 5.41.0 M 144.3)tea a•1/2..5.5n.......t M. 1.0.06 M 7051 Mw N•1/7 a.•N ae... > Q 1.5.150 00.0541.N•1/1.a Pew w..l 1.•.w Et CNI Ow.N 3340 t..t is 1.•014.)Of 220....0; Q o ...c.M$01.113 4•4 N•3/0 i••5 i.A a.t•........ 1•T P•L La. •at(100 1.144-0-.1)1555.15 t.•15..10 Q V .. .•P So(OMITS Z -..5 Ae. S..M./ •P•t£...wri a 0002'10'Ert• ••• M trY. ✓-•.5 r•.7•T r•L(......1 S..w.6•2030-"Wt.• .On.•.55..6 a.r.." 1..w.M•01.11 1•.t Is a.port OF 0205514¢ ..Ads GAM ow..211363 •w•4N d M.0.••• 2.002.02I STATL1..wT S o OW own....oi.W.•*4....55555.M..di.•a...1NIl N a J . .cA..l w ye./.ye /•02 •5 WII a t• * W • 130 ..M .o•I. .1113.....r •4•.✓1•.•••. •••Pet•...N as w•...150•ea M•.s is . t.5 H O_ sweish•l1...yVl .•.••551.5 r write-r-.•• 114 asap ; w 4..110,craw.N P.I.M......SI•....•M h•clk...14....55 e5 tr Tr..01.r r r...M.r L••Sw.a,.,. o .. O . x ` aae J.Dana 1.51.1..55 5510.0.4 two St...y. G a o G a °,a•.,. sass*WOW.no. 30. _ - Ittn..Yw.••.AasOdr..-i.4 140 f30P.P.T 12100 saw.Rawl. 0 (214)•77•7010 • 9 OF S an'On' i ._.7, .. .. __