HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-05-31 410 kW.° '48110
Zoning Board of Adjustment
May 31 , 1979
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting of the Zoning Board of Adjustment
was called to order at 7:40 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Euless City Hall by
Acting Chairman Bill Pasteur. Other members present were Messrs. Don Calhoun,
William Dorsey, Nick Anagnostis and Marland Ernest.
Also present were Planning and Zoning Co-
ordinator, Kent Flynn and recording secretary Barbara Kellar.
VISITORS
Visitors in attendance were Messrs. Alan
Clark, Melvin Shuler, Troy Fuller and Ms. Becky Gunter.
PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF HEATH AND
COMPANY ON BEHALF OF DENNY'S RESTAURANTS,
INC. FOR A VARIANCE TO THE CITY OF EULESS
ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING A SIGN AT THE
DENNM'S RESTAURANT UNDER CONSTRUCTION ON
THE EAST-BOUND SPUR 350, ACCESS ROAD EAST
OF FM 157.
Acting Chairman Bill Pasteur stated proponents
for the variance will be heard first, and then any opponents. He opened the Public
Hearing and requested a representative of Heath and Company.
Mr. Clark, of Heath and Company, stated they
are requesting a variance to the Sign Ordinance which presently allows a maximum
sign height of thirty feet. A sign thirty feet in height at this location would
barely be visible from the freeway. Therefore, they are requesting the variance
to allow the sign to be sixty feet in height. The sign at the Shell station is
about sixty-five feet in height and is visible from about two to three miles.
Mr. Dorsey asked the requested height of the
proposed sign.
Mr. Clark stated the proposed height is sixty
feet, which is about the same height of the Shell station. However, the two signs
will not block each other.
Mr. Flynn asked Mr. Clark if he was asking
for a variance for the sign shown in the drawing that was submitted with the sign
permit.
Mr. Clark confirmed that he was.
4111w 1/41010' 4.01) loW)
4NW 40
(Page Two, Zoning Board of Adjustment, May 31 , 1979)
Mr. Flynn stated that the proposed sign would
require a variance not only tb the height requirement, but also the area requirement.
He stated the present ordinance provides a maximum height of thirty feet, and a
maximum area of fifty square feet. The proposed sign contains approximately 250
square feet.
Acting Chairman Pasteur asked Mr. Flynn how
the City felt about the height variance in light of the fact that this sign would
be instantly recognized as a national logo.
Mr. Flynn stated the staff had done some
research on the subject of freeway signs at the request of one of the Board members.
Mr. Flynn distributed the staff letter which contained this information.
Mr. Flynn stated that the staff is not suggest-
ing that a variance be granted, but that the staff had researched the need for re-
vising the current sign ordinance as it relates to freeway signs. Mr. Flynn stated
that there had been concern in the past that the area requirements of the present
ordinance might be too restrictive to permit a safe reading of some sign copy at
freeway speeds. Specifically, the present maximum area of 50 square feet may be
too small to allow the lettering of long names at a readable size. However,
"Denny's " is short enough to fit if printed at standard freeway copy size such as
appears on the D/FW Tropical Plant sign (21"-24") . The proposed Denny's sign shows
a copy size of 40"-64", which is not necessary to allow easy reading of the sign.
Mr. Flynn stated that the staff would hope that the research material presented in
the staff letter could be feferred to as a guide if the Board should allow a
variance to the area requirements of the present ordinance.
With reference to the requested variance to
the height requirement, Mr . Flynn stated the maximum height of a sign at the
present time is 30' . However, this would be measured from the level of the road-
way from which the sign would be read. Therefore, since Spur 350 is 111 feet
above the elevation of the subject property, the sign would be allowed to be
41 .5 feet in height, which is just below the Shell sign. Also, research has been
done on the distance of vidibility of a sign 41 .5 feet in height at this location.
He displayed a diagram indicating that the sign would be visible from about four
hundred (400) feet west of the freeway exit that would be taken to reach the site
from the west. Mr. Flynn stated that since a sign at 41 .5 height could be seen
in plenty of time to exit the freeway, staff feels that the purpose of the sign is
served at the height allowed in the present ordinance.
Mr. Flynn stated that the site had 200 feet
of frontage. He added that for comparison D/FW Tropical plants had 400 feet of
frontage and that their sign is easily read from the freeway and that it is 30
feet high and has an area of 150 square feet.
Acting Chairman Pasteur asked if there
were any opponents. There were none.
410, 4100' NINO
(Page Three, Zoning Board of Adjustment, May 31 , 19 )
Mr. Ernest asked the maximum area being con-
sidered by the staff for freeway signs if the ordinance was amended.
Mr. Flynn stated the areas being considered
are those outlined in the staff letter.
Mr. Dorsey asked if the neighboring property
owners were notified.
Mr. Flynn stated property owners within 200
feet of the subject property were notified by certified mail .
Acting Chairman Pasteur declared the Public
Hearing closed.
Mr. Ernest made a motion to deny the bariance
to the sign ordinance as presented.
Mr. Calhoun took his place with the commission
at this time. He stated he had heard most of the discussion and was ready to make
a decision.
The vote on Mr. Ernest's motion was as follows:
Ayes: Messrs. Ernest and Anagnostis. Nays: Messrs. Dorsey, Calhoun, and Pasteur.
Acting Chairman Pasteur stated the motion
failed.
Mr. Calhoun made a motion to grant the
variance as requested to allow the sign to be 60' in height and 250 square feet
in area.
Mr. Dorsey seconded the motion and the vote
was as follows: Ayes: Messrs. Calhoun, Dorsey, and Pasteur. Nays: Messes.
Anagnostis and Ernest.
Acting Chairman Pasteur stated the variance
is approved.
Mr. Ernest stated the ordinance requires a
minimum of four concurring votes to approve a variance.
Acting Chairman stated the variance as re-
quested, therefore, failed.
Mr. Ernest made a motion to grant a variance
to the area portion of the Sign Ordinance to allow the sign to be 150 square feet.
Four Zoning Board of Adjustment, May 31 , 1
(Page 9 J � Y 979)
Mr. Anagnostis seconded the motion and the
vote was as follows: Ayes: Messrs. Ernest, Anagnostis, Calhoun and Dorsey.
Nays: none
Acting Chairman Pasteur declared the motion
carried. The proposed sign would be a maximum 41 .5 feet in height as allowed by
the present Sign Ordinance and would contain a maximum 150 square feet in area
as stipulated in the variance.
II .
REQUEST OF MELVIN B. SHULER AND
ASSOCIATES FOR A VARIANCE TO THE
CITY OF EULESS ZONING ORDINANCE
REGARDING THE ONE TO ONE PARKING
RATIO FOR THEIR PROPOSED WESTERN
6 MOTEL TO BE LOCATED NORTH OF
SPUR 350, WEST OF NORTH MAIN
STREET, AND EAST OF BYERS AVENUE.
Acting Chairman Pasteur opened the Public
Hearing and requested a representative for the requested variance.
Mr. Shuler of 2225 Randol Mill Road in
Arlington stated he is the local real estate agent and broker representing
Western 6 Motels in their request for a variance to the parking requirements of
the City Zoning Ordinance. He presented a photo of a typical Western 6 Motel ,
several of which are located in the area. This particular site was chosen because
of its location on the freeway near the airport. They are proposing 126 units
at the motel , which will also have a meeting room about the size of three of the
units combined. The variance, if granted, would provide a one to one ratio of
parking spaces per unit which has proven adequate for the other motels across the
country. Western 6 has thirty locations in Texas. The average occupancy rate of
the motels is 91%.
Acting Chairman Pasteur asked the proposed
numbersof parking spaces for the 126 units.
Mr. Shuler stated the site plan indicates
131 parking spaces.
Mr. Anagnostis asked the number of employees
proposed at the motel .
Mr. Shuler stated there probably would be
from four to six employees with a manager living on the premises. The employees
would be there during the day only.
Mr. Ernest asked how the number of 131
parking spaces was decided upon.
0100.1 "40m00
(Page Five, Zoning Board of Adjustment, May 31 , 1979)
Mr. Shuler stated the architect drew up the
plans and he is not certain how he arrived at that figure.
Acting Chairman Pasteur stated that 131
spaces were probably all there was toom for on the property.
Mr. Shuler stated there would not be a
restaurant in conjunction with the motel . Therefore, he feels the 1 .5 to 1
ratio is too high in this particular case.
Acting Chairman Pasteur asked Mr. Flynn if
the ratio would be different if a restaurant were built in conjunction with the
motel .
Mr. Flynn stated the ratio required is 1 .2
to 1 and not 1 .5 to 1 as previously stated. Also, the 1 .2 to 1 is for the motel
units and meeting room only. If a restaurant were built in conjunction with the
motel , additional parking would be required.
Mr. Dorsey asked what adverse affect there
would be if adequate parking were not provided.
Mr. Calhoun stated it would create a problem
with people attempting to park on the service road or in the church parking lot
located next to the proposed site.
Acting Chairman Pasteur asked if there were
any opponents. There were none. He declared the Public Hearing closed.
Acting Chairman Pasteur asked Mr. Flynn
what the staff recommendation was regarding this variance request.
Mr. Flynn distributed the staff letter
which is to be made a part of the minutes. He explained the purpose of the
ordinance requirement for 1 .2 parking spaces per room and suggested that either
the number of rooms be reduced or the additional parking spaces be supplied as the
ordinance requires.
Mr. Dorsey made a motion to deny the variance
to the off-street parking requirement as requested by Mr. Shuler.
Mr. Ernest seconded the motion and the vote
was as follows: Ayes: Messrs. Dorsey, Ernest, Anagnostis and Calhoun. Nays: None
Acting Chairman Pasteur declared the motion
carried, thereby denying the requested variance.
4qr
(Page' Six, Zoning Board of Adjustment, May 31 , 1979)
III .
ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Mr. Ernest suggested electing a Vice-Chairman
to the Board.
Mr. Pasteur stated that since new members have
been appointed to the Board, a new Chairman and Vice-Chairman should be elected.
Mr. Ernest stated he would prefer then to wait
until the next meeting when the present chairman, Mr. Banks, will be present.
Acting Chairman Pasteur suggested meeting
thirty minutes prior to the next meeting to elect officers. This was agreed upon.
IV.
AMENDMENT TO SIGN ORDINANCE
Mr. Ernest made a motion to request the City
Council to consider an amendment to the Sign Ordinance concerning the height and
area requirements of signs fronting on freeways.
Mr. Anagnostis seconded the motion and the
vote was as follows: Ayes: Messrs, Dorsey, Anagnostis, Ernest and Calhoun.
Acting Chairman Pasteur declared the motion
carried.
V.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8: 30 p.m.