HomeMy WebLinkAbout1970-04-07 Redu<ar Meeting
of the
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 7, 1470
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Planning and
Zoning Commission was called to order at 8:05 P. M. , in the Council Chambers
of Euless City Hall , by Chairman Leonard Weber. Members present are listed
as follows : Messrs. E. E. Kepllnger, Harry Arth, Jack Browne, Richard
Leggett, Bill Tench, Jack Cline and Leonard Weber.
Also present were Administrative Assistant
Charles L. Jordan, Mr, Chester McKay, Assistant to the City Inspector, and
Recording Secretary Florence Murr.
VISITORS
Visitors in attendance are listed as
follows : Mrs. Anne S. Martin, Mr. and Mrs. M. B. Allen, Messrs. W. K.
Lawrence, Walter A. Elliott, Jr. , Stephen H. Horton, Dan Shull , Charles M.
Hunt, Jay H. Theder, A. Barton Wright, Jr. , Charles 5.' Williams and William R.
Ratliff, Consulting Engineer.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mr. Arth moved to approve minutes of the
regular meeting dated March 3, 1970, as written. Mr. Leggett seconded the
motion, and the vote is as follows :
Ayes : Messrs. Arth, Leggett, Tench, Browne, Cline and Keplinger
Nays : None
Chairman Weber declared the motion carried.
| | .
PUBLIC HEARING ZONING CASE NU 202,
REQUEST FOR REZONING 6.2q3 ACRES IN
J. E. FIELD SURVEY `�� / n S ( [ LE FAMILY
DWELLING DISTRICT TO COMMUNITY ---
--' ---
BUSINESS DISTRICT AND 7,717ACRES FROM "R-I "
TO //R-3n MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT
MR. CLAUDE R. MCCLEN TRUSTEE.
(LOCATED AT S0OTHWEST COR�ER0F NORTH MAIN
AND GLADE ROAD) ' -
'--
, .., ,
Two_%._. f.Juir M -,!7.„.....:-.. :)! r.. .. ,:.:-' :.,, '-'::_....;:= :......T:.=,„ ,_...::....i;,:*,,, ..A.',:l..„_:.,
1 , .1970'
himself for this portov Of t'Li-. (,7keet.7:', ..:. : -k-"Thl.,1 Hto . 7..„., . H7e--,...,,e,. ';
2e ' -H...?„,,. c Ht .ri•-.9.
on Zoning Case No. 202, to cosiHe...- .Y:-:e .-- .::..,=H: - of Critrie R. M:,.-.
for rezoning 6.293 acres 7. .:-.. C-e „7,. E . T.11..;:,Ha ',:, , ,-..e . froi R-7 ' Si .:.,
Dwelling District to 'IC.--"2" Cort :.7.(. B7H,7:. CH. -7 '-li' -! 7777
J . E. Field Survey, from R-l " '::i.,-, ... ::v . :f.).17.. 7 V .E., r 70 '1:■--'5▪ '
Multiple Family Neliing Dri,.:.t.
',,h- e,-- ,'ee Mr. Bi ; i
a representative for W . C7.a ,..ie: P. M.., :" .......,Y , „H. , W;EC
property in (41:,esto i ., ',ocat,-.J .7.,,It '.:: -.. ' — —,'„:.,.-,„:: -:::. --nf. -- of N(.,rt:-i
and Glade Road -- rHat t'ere i., abp-0.-A. -- . . =-,-+-; fee o,-, Glade. Rrd a: .,:i 'r)67
feet on North Ms - See[ -- .t,-,.at 7.'7 H , ...- :,,...• , ,,:,Lered fr:,- Hi, ..,- ▪ t
best use of the propertv, %...-.,.7nq LHe t:, 'H-: '• ,4, -..f- - ',71 -,;.:- 7.-,,. c,.; de ? fcr: :be
planning. Mr. Lawrence irt -o&;ced m ., 'N. ' • ,: ' , ho ; ', :- ..-. e.:r 1-E7. 7ed•
to coordinate ti-e wo „
mr. 7.-t7r .,.-
Airport site, Hghways ard vropose2 Hi .,H.' ,..,,. . ,.. ,f?-7.7(.. i,A:.er i.H.H. , !'. :.,:' area
map showing the City of E,Jlies and L.., .'-e...... : :,:-:"-7.
M.,-. 'H7,2' . -_.- ,,--eHered a r,.-7p ,&....pHy
recommended Highway S'istem for tne ye,a- -;.;.; w'T-, ws ,'(..e-ped ..a...
of a Transportation StAy made by the. ,,f= Rec:.71o:-
in conjunction with the Texas Hiuhwe,./ Oe,:... ..,-.':!re - , Br '; o!': E. Iic Roads a7d other
Agencies. Mr. Elliott poi,-,ted cut ro :,,.7 ,7i -e,,-,omme-.6ed roas for .t .e. aree,
stating that, in his opinion, Glade Roa0 L, ,r,, 'relerred ..o as W.atal..;gaitfield Road)
should not be less than or:e. hudre To,,)0) t.tet. wie. Mro E7(7Qt COTMered that
this increased width would necessite .,,.',-,,Jpeac..-: from t.7, . City .;t Grape- 'e.
Mr. C. ,..,-. 7 ',A,, ; sed th::,it ti7:- prope,-ty was
analyzed in two phases -- ooe, a commerCa complex a,:-d se - ;Js , a .t.:,...,Jfer
zone -- that commercial property is pr000 for a 500 ft. x. 500 ft. square
(at the corner of Glade Road and North (s1..' '.7.,hreet , ac,d a , artmet complex
is proposed for the 700 ft. x 500 1::-. ! :..... -.qo
Mr. EM77 commened that. he : s of i e opinion
Highway 360 will Pe ;n the. viciity of t:.7e.. 17cof.:er ,r,,. i. , 4we...'nt7o - - po.,„ ibly East
of North Main Street, and that North Ivi, , 0-:o, d alo be a thorognfe,re.
Mr. Tho-. . :,' rated ti:.7.t a sdy based o the
City's Zoning Ordir,ance, was made t.:y M7-. .::±::ttpe HrtcO Arch7tect fc.ni IMrst --
that an office building is proposed for C.Te No4Hgt. corer of the proposed
commercially zoned tract, retail sa;et. ,...-:., - ,-e7-.a,„ a,T-7 are proposed for the
L
'170 ,
tor 're cprrer ,
o : c ,re
frjo lo- " ■Pir'
284 c )- lo
/5 sp:ces 1t s - ? - - "4' '
soc fee-, M-. , . Sr, 7 "
eNct-ed ,ot C '
t e - tel . - ' ; ot
Jevt- 001`.: 'ed 1 -e
ft
Mesver C,' -.)“-- -*, ss'on
. 1 - ti ) ,
WcI" - -tire
co,-,--.ribu7e to - o,
m-, -
ro6cr 2oytem --do-
Mr, to. p c
; ne MHE PP follows s of
dev ,et 'on From the recommedaricy-
M-,
preset alorgg S. H ,
Mr co r ...,7)107 aft sat. vt
M , Ter_;- ."-.00fd Mr, Elliott w'--)e[e -e
res;c1e-Inlal property would be, if ti-e H. 83 wrils e- mtosed
aloig other tnoro,,,ight6res
Mr , hat , r. hls op o
Eu1e5s s go:ng through a change -- to be re.-1 mp o tnis
area which w: ll iesser the demerA for
M-„ Te- ch feir., r:ded Mr . Eflrot - of h, , comments
concerrrig the --d._411ber of people who a the res-„., H ol - -e Reg'fonal
A: rport ad a,ked row to
e
patter- 7s ofteTF set by .7-he a..-1- 71-tAe, of ,—,; e A, (1 s ro-
will be built. : here -- that op7.-r.7w-,-,, rheit . ( r:r , 0
area North of Lc:0e Beer Creek ,,,,r)H S' Ce I .e- ' .,;eLy be
C,AmMeT (.. Mr . Eli ;or, r I M, . i ' he wo :,o,
two e
(Pa.e Four Re•ular Meetin• of the Planin• and Zonir�• Comr ' _ -'
1.970
Mr. Arth asked how the < "-ze: E -c_: its
question compare with the recommendation of the Land Pla ,:e,•
Mr. Elliott replied rhr : _ Baal .
Mr. Arth asked if the rey.��s
zoning is contingent upon getting apartment zoning for the c `~e
Mr. Elliott replied that ;;-P
associates are interested in all of the property and requested c:.) : st ,or of all
of it -- that they would like to have compatible zoning for °hot-- rr<;;c_ so they.
will have something to work from.
In reply to a question from M; yeY
Mr. Elliott advised that he did not know the zoning classific r ,�;, >f er
property in the area which is situated in the City of Grape -?e
of the opinion it is probably the same as Euless, either resid -
Y
agricultural -- that he is sure it will eventually be zoned c .," or -dustrial
because of the Regional Airport.
Mr. Keplinger asked if th r - de;:ei opment
will be constructed in phases.
Mr. Elliott replied that a doe o- b xow --
that it probably will be constructed in phases, according to the of the
community.
In reply to Mr. Keplinger es r; Mr,
Elliott stated that plans for the apartment development are ,'of that
they probably will follow the pattern of other area apartme- t: de,ve ogre
Replying to a question from Mr . e, Mr .
Elliott advised that the recommended land use for the property ` „r.rr ah
and apartments.
Mr. Cline asked if, in Mr.
the rezoning of the commercial tract would create isolated zo o pot zoning.
Mr. Elliott replied that it wouH rpro h*;y be
by itself for a while, but he does not consider it would be spar zo i 7 because
it is the recommended zoning for the property, according to the M.s-er t4di, Mr.
Elliott commented that, in his opinion, it will be hard for peop e =o di, A and
develop in that area -- that the Regional Airport will have .a G,.ea,ef rpacz on
residential developments. Mr. Elliott referred to a fine reside- : iri d evelopment
in North Dallas which is changing rapidly, due to the airport: i ea
iftw
(Pa•e Five Resular Meetin. of the Plannin. and Zonin. Commi si . A.ri
1970
Mr. Cline referred to residential develop-
ments in the Cities of Los Angeles, Phoenix and Albuquerque, which are near the
airport.
Mr. Cline asked Mr. Elliott if, assuming
the apartment complex is developed on Main Street, would it be contrary to the
established land use on the Master Plan in 1980.
Mr. Elliott stated that it would not because
apartment zoning is the recommended land use.
Mr. Cline asked if the apartments would be
adverse to the residential pattern.
Mr. Elliott replied negatively! calling
attention to a very fine development in the City of Dallas, in tine vicinity of
Royal Lane and Walnut Hills, where there are commercial , residential and apartment
developments in the same area.
Mr. Cline commented that, as he sees it, this
would be the end of Main Street and would be heavily traveled1
Mr. Elliott reminded Mr. ;line that residential
developments also place a heavy burden on the roads.
In reply to questions from fir. 14eplinger, Mr.
Elliott advised that the route for Highway 360 has not been definitely determined,
and that the proposed development will probably be completed about the same time
as the completion of Highway 360. 1
Mr. Leggett asked Mr! Elliott what he considers
an adequate distance for construction of residences from the western boundary
of the Regional Airport.
Mr. Elliott stated that he clops not have an
opinion -- that the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council will determine
what is developed and how it is developed -- that they will determine the growth
of the City -- that it is his personal opinion that residential growth will be
less.
Mr. Cline stated that he is definitely anxious
to see a main artery developed for commercial useage Tr that from the commercial
aspect, in his opinion, it would be fine, but at this time he is opposed to the
apartments. Mr. Cline asked if it would be possible to recomngd alaproval of
only a portion of this request.
IL Mr. Elliott replied that the DeveloPers can
justify the entire tract as commercial -- that they are trying to follow the
(Page Six, Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission Aril 7,
1970) VII
Plan -- that fourteen (14) acres is not a large shopping area To that
they are not opposed to having all of the property zoned commercial,
Mr. Tench advised that he has never seen
this Altered Master Plan before and attempted to find out who had the authority to
alter the Master Plan.
Mr. Browne advised that this matter was
discussed at a joint meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the
City Council , which was attended by him and several other Members of the Commission.
Chairman Weber stated that Members of, the
Commission were advised previously that it might be necessary for them to make
recommendations which deviate from the Land Use Map, and, possibly, this is
where Members will have to decide whether or not they go along with the recommend-
ed zoning. Chairman Weber advised that Mr. Elliott is merely presenting this
case for a client and suggested that Members of the Commission ,ask specific
questions which do not involve Mr. Elliott 's personal opinion,
Chairman Weber asked If there was anyone
present who wished to speak in opposition to this rezoning request, There being
none, the Public Hearing was closed.
Mr. Tench stated that, in his opinion, this
matter is premature -- that the highways are not definite and no one has seen the
over-lay which is on the Master Plan before.
Chairman Weber asked if the City has received
anything definite from the Highway Department.
Mr. Bill Ratliff, Cityos Consulting Engineer,
stated that his firm has been asked, by the City Manager, to try to upTdate the
Land Use Map, indicating proposed zoning for the City, taking into consideration
information which can be obtained from the Highway Departmeni „ Mr, Ratliff advised
that he' metvwith representatives of the Texas Highway Department earlier on that
date and learned that the Highway Department does not have anything on Piper --
that it cannot release any definite information until after the Public Hearing on
the Corridor Route -- that the Highway Department will tall you abput the same thing
the Airport Authority tells them, which is where they want they roads to be.
Mr. Leggett commented that, in his opinion,
this rezoning is premature, as were other cases heard by the Planning end Zoning
Commission.
Coe
(Pare Seven Re.ular Meetin• of the Plannin. and Zonin. Commission Aril 7,
ip
Mr. Leggett moved to recommend denial of
the request for rezoning 6.293 acres in the J. E. Field Survey, from "R-1"
to "C-2" and 7.717 acres in the same survey, from "R-1 " to "R-3", as petitioned
in Zoning Case No. 202, until there is something definite concerning area
roads affecting this particular property. Mr. Tench seconded the and
the vote. is as follows :
Ayes: Messrs. Arth, Leggett, Tench and Keplinger
Nays: Mr. Cline
Chairman Weber declared the motion carried.
(Mr. Jack Browne returned to his place as a Member of the Planning and Zoning
Commission at this time.)
III .
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL,
HUMBLE OIL COMPANY SERVICE STATION
BITE AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF S.H. 183
AND RAIDER DRIVE
Mr. Walter Elliott advised that he is
present to represent Humble Oil Company, who request approval of the preliminary
plat for their service station site at the Northwest corner of S.H. 183 and
Raider Drive, which is being platted as Euless Square. Mr. Elliott located the
property in question on the map and advised that sewer facilities will be extend-
ed from the South and the water line will tie into the existing water main on
Monterrey Boulevard.
Chairman Weber stated that he recalls there
is a problem concerning access to the property at the Northeast corner of this
intersection and asked Mr. Elliott if the property in question has the same
problem.
Mr. Elliott replied that it is the same;
however, he is of the opinion it should fit well with the planning -- that the
Developers will ask for openings, however, this will be worked out with the
Highway Department and the City of Euless.
Mr. Ratliff stated that his firm reviewed
this plat; however, he failed to submit a letter on it -- that they have no
exceptions at this time -- that, possibly there are a couple of minor things
concerning the water system that will be questioned; however, they do not have
to be determined during the preliminary stage of development.
AF
(Pa•e Ei•ht Re.ular Meeting of the P1a::nin• and Zonin. Commission Aril
Mr. Arth moved to recommend approval of the
Preliminary Plat for Humble Oil Company's service station site at the Northwest
corner of S.H. 183 and Raider Drive (Euless Square) . Mr. Leggett seconded the
motion, and the vote is as follows :
Ayes: Messrs. Arth, Leggett, Tench, Browne, Cline and Keplinger
Nays: None
Chairman Weber declared the motion carried.
IV.
CONSIDER LOT REVISION:
CHANGE IN SIZE OF LOT'S ONE
AND TWO BLOCK H , SOMERSET
PLACE ADDITION MR. HUGH WAITE
Mr. Tench moved to table the request for
changes in size of Lots One and Two, Block H, Somerset Place Addition, for
lack of representation for Developer. Mr. Cline seconded the motion, and the
vote is as follows :
Ayes : Messrs. Arth, Leggett, Tench, Browne, Cline and Keplinger
Nays: None
Chairman Weber declared the motion carried.
V.
PARK.AND RECREATION COMMITTEE
REPORT MR CHARLES HUNT
Chairman Weber recognized Mr. Charles Hunt,
Chairman of the Park and Recreation Committee, who presented materials, concern-
ing recommendations from the Committee, to each Member of the Planning and
Zoning Commission, and introduced Mrs. David Martin and Mr. Jay Theder, Members
of the Park and Recreation Committee.
Mr. Hunt advised that the Park and Recreation
Committee has held about nineteen (19) meetings since this time last year --
that the Committee has been very harmonious in its ' operation, and the recommenda-
tions being made are the unanimous consensus of the Committee. Mr. Hunt stated
the City Council recommended that the Park and Recreation Committee touch base
with the Planning and Zoning Commission to ascertain that its recommendations
are not in conflict with good planning and zoning, which is the purpose of this
report.
(page Nine, Regular Meeting of the Plar.H ng and Zoning Commission, April 7,
1970)
Mr. Hunt presented Park and Recreeation
Committee recommendations, and commented, as follows °
1 . Secure twenty (20) acres of land for a park in an area
of projected population growth, specifically, land along
Little Bear Creek, West of North Main Street.
Mr . Hunt commented that the purchase of
land takes priority over everything else -- that the proposed site is located
within the area designated as "Green Belt" on the City 's Master Plan -- that some
of the land in the area being considered is subject to flooding, and it is the
opinion of the Committee that picnic areas and park facilities which do not
require permanent structures can be placed on this portion, Mr. Hunt stated that
the purchase of twenty (20) acres has been recommended because the Committee would
like for the City to consider requesting federal assistance in the purchase of
this property -- that money is available -- that information was obtained from
Mr. Gene Wright of the Metropolitan Development Office in Fort Worth, and Euless
is qualified for assistance -- that this Agency wants to help Cities like Euless,
which has been stripped by the Regional Airport , Mr. Hunt advised that the
Committee recommended, a month or so ago, that the City Manager proceed with
application to the Metropolitan Development Office -- that the application is
now being processed; however, has been delayed for additional engineering study,
which is being done at this time. Mr. Hunt advised that twenty (20) acres is
part of the criteria -- that Metropolitan Development speaks of twenty (20)
acres or less in an area where the population will be,
2. Purchase approximately three (3) acres of land as a part of
or adjacent to, the park land mentioned in Item One, to be
used specifically as a Swimming Pool site,
Mr, Hunt commented that this land must be
high enough, above the flood level and be suitable for a pool -- that this
purchase would be necessary only if the twenty (20) acres does not contain an
adequate pool site.
In reply to a question from Mr. Keplinger,
Mr. Hunt advised that flood water from this area flows toward the airport.
Mr. Theder advised that he is of the opinion
Little Bear Creek will be widened for drainage purposes -- that this should
alleviate the problem, allowing flood waters to drain more rapidly,, thus
eliminating the backing up of flood waters into the subject area.
(Pa.e Ter Re•ular Meetin• of the Plannin. and Zonin. Commission A.ril 7,
1970
Replying to a question from Mr. Leggett, Mr.
Ratliff advised that the Airport will be so vastly improved that any back-water
will be lessened -- that his firm would try to determine the maximum flood of
record before approving construction of the swimming pool .
3. That the City Manager authorize a preliminary engineering
plan of the entire area proposed for a park development and
pool site layout.
Mr. Hunt advised that this project is
partially underway at this time.
4. The building of a fifty (50) meter multi-purpose swimming
pool on the previously mentioned three (3) acre tract. Construction
to begin at the earliest possible date as we believe the need to be
acute.
Mr. Hunt stated that the Committee has looked at
one particular plan -- a municipal pool which was constructed in the City of
Denton in 1964 at a cost of from $120,000.00 to $125,000.00.
Mr. Hunt read a letter from Consulting Engineer
Bill Ratliff, dated April 6, 1970, as follows :
"In response to your request, we have attempted to estimate the
probable increase in cost for a pool similar to that constructed
by the City of Denton in 1964. The Engineering News Record Cost
Index in 1964. was approximately 935. That index today is some-
thing in excess of 1335, or an increase of approximately 43%.
According to your information, the pool was constructed at that
time for $125,000.00 and by using the Engineering News Record Index,
we would estimate a cost today of approximately $178,000.00.
You and your Committee will of course realize that this figure
must be an approximation and no estimate can be made without a
determination of the details desired by your committee. "
Mr. Hunt stated that a report from the
Director of Parks and Recreation for the City of Euless indicates that use of
the pool at Midway Park exceeds its ' capacity.
5. In other areas such as Midway Park, where large crowds of people
gather for various types of park activities, the need for
additional restrooms is very apparent and prompted this committee,
last fall , to make the recommendation for construction of a
utility building housing restrooms, a workshop for park
maintenance personnel , storage area for maintenance equipment,
as well as a storage room that could be used to house baseball
equipment during the off season.
(Pa.e Eleven, Re.ular Meetin. of the Plannin. and Zonin. Commission . Aril 7,
1970
Mr. Hunt stated that the estimated cost for
such a building at that time was $7,000.00, and the Euless Athletic Association
has offered to contribute $2,000.00 of that amount; however, this cost is also
inflated and construction cost would exceed that amount at this time.
6. Two baseball diamonds in Midway Park are in need of lighting
repairs and improvements that would make them better suited
to the needs of the teenage boys. Lighting on these two
fields, at present, is poor and generally inadequate. Some of
the old and improperly placed light poles are weak and present
a safety hazard.
Mr. Hunt advised that local people associated
with the baseball program were already aware of this problem; however, out of
town guests also called it to their attention last year.
7. Participation in a Federal Assistance Program for "Open
Space" parks. Acquisition of land is a first priority
consideration by all members of the Committee.
Mr. Hunt stated that $100,000.00 is currently
on deposit, which was set aside for the proposed joint project with Trinity High
School for construction of a swimming pool -- that an additional $110,000.00
should be available in 1970 from bonds which were allocated but not sold.
8. Park and Recreation Committee recommends the sale of the
entire amount of Bonds authorized, One Hundred Ten Thousand
Dollars ($110,000.00) for 1970, as soon as possible; the
money to be used toward development of these recommendations.
(To be added to the One Hundred Thousand ($100,000.00) Dollars
now on deposit. )
Mr. Hunt commented that, possibly, the cost
of priority projects exceeds their allocation, but hopefully, the City Council
can make additional funds available for other projects -- that Members of the
Committee feel they are very important and all needed attention yesterday.
In reply to Mr. Keplinger's question, Mr.
Hunt advised that other studies concerning park sites within the City have been
made; however, cost is the determining factor -- that the City cannot afford to
pay $6,000.00, $8,000.00 or $10,000.00 for a park site Mr. Hunt stated that
the concept of the Park and Recreation Committee and the local School Board
is that a park be situated adjacent to an elementary school -- that the City
owns twenty (20) acres in West Euless Park site and he is of the opinion the
School District wants a portion of it.
(Page Twelve, Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, April 7,
1970)
Chairman Weber asked if there are owners of
property in the "Green Belt" in the vicinity of North Main who are receptive to
selling their land.
Mr. Hunt replied that the Committee is of the
opinion it is available and the price is negotiable -- that the City Manager will
negotiate for purchase of the property.
Mr. Theder advised that under the Open Space
Program there is one stipulation -- that being the Park must be used as such
forever.
Chairman Weber asked if the Committee has con-
sidered construction of a park which might be revenue producing after it is built.
Mr. Hunt advised that this has been taken into
consideration -- that he is of the opinion they need to look into the possibility
of a golf course, which could produce revenue and could help support the Park
and Recreation Program -- that this has been discussed by the Committee.
Mr. Arth asked if the Committee has worked on
a list of recommendations concerning things which are needed, disregarding the
amount of money which is available at this time.
Mr. Hunt replied affirmatively -- that this
information is available.
Mr. Theder stated that the Committee has a
guideline for their needs -- that the recommendations presented this evening
are for the remainder of the year 1970.
Mr. Hunt stated that the nice thing about
Federal Assistance is that they will match the City's dollars, even on legal
fees and, possibly, preliminary development such as picnic areas and tennis
courts.
Mrs. Martin stated that, in her opinion, the
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council should continue to require
Developers of Apartment Developments to furnish adequate recreational facilities
to accommodate their tenants.
Mr. Cline moved to concur with Park and
Recreation Committee Recommendations, Points one through eight, and recognize their
intensive study. Mr. Leggett seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows :
Cor
(Page Thirteen, Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, April 7,
1970)
Ayes: Messrs. Arth, Leggett, Nil*, Browne, Tench and Keplinger
Nays : None
Chairman Weber declared the motion carried.
VI .
REPORT ON UP-DATING OF CITY
MASTER PLAN, MR. BILL RATLIFF
Mr. Bill Ratliff advised that City Manager
Griggs asked him to advise Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission that
he has been instructed to make another Land Use Map, using .the same basic
theory, applying zoning changes which have been made, and to make recommenda-
tions for amending the future use plan. Mr. Ratliff stated indications at this
time, are that there will be only one East-West thoroughfare, and the crossing,
possibly, will be North of Bear Creek. (The Master Plan shows two proposed East-
West thoroughfares.) Mr. Ratliff advised that, hopefully, his firm will
present a recommended amendment to the future land use plan in about three
weeks -- that a definite route for Highway 360 will not be included -- that
he will work from verbal information received from the Highway Department
because, as he explained earlier in this meeting, that is all that is avail-
able at this time. Mr. Ratliff stated that the Highway Department is working
on Highway 121 at this time and, possibly, it will be two (2) years before the
definite route of Highway 360 is made available. Mr. Ratliff stated that, in
his opinion, the City can have an influence on where they put Highway 360, and
he proposes that the City tell them what it would like to see -- that the Highway
Department does not want Euless ' opposition in the Corridor Route Public Hearing.
Mr. Cline stated that the City of Euless
has a problem of being "land locked" and asked if the City has considered
presenting the problem to architects, requesting that they plan a model city.
Mr. Ratliff replied that, in his opinion,
zoning is a dictation in itself, but when you take it out of a man 's hands
without even the right to a public hearing, and tell him what he has to do with
his property, you have a problem. Mr. Ratliff advised that he, personally,
does not favor Model Cities -- that they are sterile and have no character.
ttor
(Pa a Fourteen, Reca�lar Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Apri1 7,
1970)
VII .
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 10:20 P. M.
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
Chairman
Secretary
fsm;i 1
L
Lool Nom)
THE PARK AND RECREATION
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
C
kors0 Now)
THE PARK AND RECREATION
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
In accordance with the Capital Improvement Program as outlined in 1966 for
the City of Euless Attachment #1 (Pages 113 and 114)
In accordance with the priority of need of the citizens of our rapidly
growing City, as established by this Committee.
In accordance with the specific request of a group of citizens in their
petition to the City Council at the regular meeting on October 28, 1989 -
"Requesting consideration for the construction of an Olympic size, multi-
purpose swimming pool " - (Letters to City Officials from interested
individuals) - Attachment #2.
In accordance with the long-term, over-all projection for future growth
and requirements for "open space" parks and additional recreational
facilities,
The Park and Recreation Committee, after a one (1 ) year study, makes the
following recommendations :
1 . Secure twenty (20) acres of land for a park in an area of
projected population growth, specifically, land along Little
Bear Creek, west of North Main Street, $eference Master Plan
"Green Belt" - Attachment #3, or refer to wall map. (Federal
assistance appears to be available toward purchase price, as
well as legal fees and some limited recreation development,
on a fifty-fifty cost sharing basis. )
2. Purchase approximately three (3) acres of land as a part of,
or adjacent to, the park land mentioned in Item One, to be
used specifically as a Swimming Pool site.
3. That the City Manager authorize a preliminary engineering
plan of the entire area proposed for a park development and
pool site layout. (This project is now, at least, partially
underway. )
4. The building of a fifty (50) meter multi-purpose swimming
pool on the previously mentioned three (3) acre tract.
Construction to begin at the earliest possible date as we
believe the need to be acute - Attachment #4 - Refer to
Park and Recreation Director-Is Swimming Pool Report dated
June 25, 1969.
tor
a. A suitable, tried and proven, plan has been obtained
and with only minor alterations can be easily adapted
to any site as it is a complete swimming complex,
including bath houses and privacy fencing. - Attachment
#5.
b. The estimated cost to be about One Hundred Seventy-Six
Thousand ($176,000.00) dollars at today's prices. (Reference
Knowlton-Ratliff-English-Collins Consulting Engineers) -
Attachment #5A - would be similar to the Municipal Swimming
Pool in Denton, Texas (Reference Denton Park and Recreation
Director) .
c. This particular plan was favored because it meets all the
criteria for swimming as well as the multi-purpose concept.
The enclosed area at poolside would be suitable for such
activities as outdoor band concerts, civic and private
dances, or other evening recreational activities. Safety
and sanitation are also built-in features of this plan.
5. In other areas such as Midway Park, where large crowds of people
gather for various types of park activities (Reference comparative
attendance statistics) - Attachment #6 - the need for additional
restrooms is very apparent and prompted this committee, last fall ,
to make the recommendation for construction of a utility building
housing restrooms, a workshop for park maintenance personnel ,
storage area for maintenance equipment, as well as a storage room
that could be used to house baseball equipment during the off
season.
The estimated cost was Seven Thousand ($7,000.00) Dollars to be
partly defrayed by a Two Thousand ($2,000.00) Dollars lease with
the Euless Athletic Association in return for use of the storage
space - Attachment #7 (Letter from Bob Yarborough of Euless
Athletic Association.)
6. Two baseball diamonds in Midway Park are in need of lighting
repairs and improvements that would make them better suited to the
needs of the teenage boys. Lighting on these two fields, at
present, is poor and generally inadequate. Some of the old and
improperly placed light poles are weak and present a safety hazard -
Attachment #8 (Letter from Bob Johnson) .
a. The Park and Recreation Director has obtained cost estimates
of repairs and necessary modifications to these two lighting
systems of about Four Thousand ($4,000.00) Dollars.
-2-
4101S *ftelij
b. The ,Park and Recreation Committee recommends this project
be undertaken as quickly as possible so that the diamonds
might be utilized for this summer's baseball program.
7. Action has already begun on the Park and Recreation Committee's
recommendation to participate in .a Federal assistance program for
"Open Space" parks.
Acquisition of land is a first priority consideration by all
members of our group.
The estimated cost of the recommendations herein exceeds the
funds available by nearly Twenty Thousand ($20,000.00) Dollars -
Attachment #9. Many:more ,worthwhile projects are needed and
appropriate recommendations will be forthcoming as needs become
apparent and funds are made available (by future bond elections) .
However, all of these recommendations are top priority.
It is the suggestion of the Park and Recreation Committee that
these additional funds be•made available from other sources such
as One Hundred Thousand ($100,000.00) Park and Recreation Bond
Fund, General Fund or Emergency Fund, and used in conjunction with
the land acquisition program as .described under Item #1
(Estimated Thirty Thousand ($30,000.40 Doilars.)
8. Park and Recreation Committee, recommends the sale of,,,,the entire
amount of Bonds authorized, ,One..Hundred Ten ,Thous.and M10,000.00).
Dollars for 1970, , es soon a s:possi.ble; the money. to be used toward
development of these recommendations. (To be added to the One Hundred
Thousand ($100,000.00) Dollars now on deposit.)
Charles M. Hunt, Chairman James Kilmer, Vice Chairman
r
Mrs. David Martin Jay H. Theder
Ivan Gregory
-3-
.
Attachment #1 ,,. III
40
J 1. NEIGHBORHOOD OR SCHOOL-PARK:
a. Fxpand the prorram for joint-une of existing School sites as ".,',
park and recreational fallities where feasible.
ment of additional facilities, acquire additional park land : "-‘4' 0
; ]
where available to serve the neighborhood needs. 1 ,
c. Cooperate with the School District in its land acquisition . 4.'
program, developing a workable arrangement of joint land ac- , . "'", i '
quisition, ncquinition of adjoining sites, etc.
20 COMMITITy_PARK:
' a. At leant one community park of 'approximately 30 acres, pre- , 4,,, .
ferably two such parks, nhould be acquired and appropriate
facilities d?veloped, including swimming pools. '
b. Study possibility of combining this park with land needs of -. 1
Civic Center.
3. REGIONAL PARK:
At thin particular time, it does not seem prudent to concen- . . -
trate on this type of park. A need for this type of park Is here, 4
but airport expansion possibilities and_other_deyelopment factors - ,,,,-,
:Mak."67-1-1--Sici-joasibTe- ticiiTlana_oT this type could be found in , ‘1,-. -.
the largely undeveloped NOFfHeii-at part of Euless.
As development continues the City should be aware of the oppor- ' . ''''.. II .
tunitien for acquisition of parkways. Such areas as low-lying land ,' f.'" j ,
In flood plains, drainage areas, etc. should become avaflable regu ,',- 1 ','
larly. City ownership and maintenance of such areas is a definite ' . :: 1
asnet to an area, nnd this fact should make negotiations for the ^, '" , 0 .
land quite favorable to the rity. For purposes of cost estimates, ' ',- .%,
some credit has been given for thin fact. ...,,
5. RFSEPVATION :
It is not considered a top priority to pursue the acquisition ''',,'%, i .
. of this type of park at this time. Sec 3. above.
ip„
'', J° 'Tr, I 1 Y y�' r N i - d "" + tokt,,, , ,.e$y1'4, . fir
II, it y'' i YI ` 41 '� , /�., ^
K' ft714C Nf - ' ' ri - ` al
°'1y
" px 1 _ - _. _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMFJT ___ ._ :
yC O E T ESTIMATES Attachment #1 ;,'
' ..
To meet the needs of a 25,000 population the following land acqui— �
sition is proposed: n.�,
Pequi red Credit Area to
;,,,%'',,,Park a Acres/l0rC Total A xistin Ae uire
. °
,';
Neighborhood 2 5n 10 40
X r.
Community 2 5r, 20 30
. (Midway) .
Regional 7.5 4` _ — .,z
Parkways 1.5 37.5 17.5* 20
Reservation 10 * — —
4 y^, .3
*See recommendations ~�
It is estimated the land costs for such acquisition, including a _ ,•`
sum for options, etc., toward a regional park acquisition, will 4.
total: $ 150,000.00 : .
. Kam, V
It is proposed to develop the following facilities by 1970: . ,
Swimming Pools ? 120,000.00 * t t - ,.
8 Softball Fields, 3 lighted 40,000.00 A •4 -f ,,.
4 Baseball Fields, P lighted 22,000.00 ,�;
12 Tennis Courtsv/ 36,000.00 6'" .
Playground Equipment 32.,000.00.. ":
Site preparation costs, such as apt '`
roads, parking, etc. 60,000.00
TOTAL PAPK AND PrcPEATIOr1AL COSTS ? 460,000.00
A d y;�.'
1 Y
' PA(;( 114 . . 4 i
s)
CITY OF U 6 , TEXAS ___._
Attachment #2
Mrs. Nelson Jones
804 Cany)n Ridge
Euless, Texes 76039
Septomber9, 1969
Mayor A. C. Kr au s e
City i:Iall
1.11.1oss, 'Texas 76039
Dear Fair:
I am writing this letter as an interested citizen of the city of
k.'uloc;s. I am iniroreotod in our city ' s growth and development and
in helpinf:; in any way that I can to make it an ideal community in
which to live.
ao were "lured to Euless three years ago when my husband was employ*
ed by American "airlines. ':le chose Euless because of the many lovely
people we had met here, the ideal location between two major cities
and the many recreational activities that were offered for our whole
family. : t that time we wore, and still are, thrilled with the
wonderful program offered at the Civic Center, plus playground
recreation in the summer, tennis lessons, gymnastics, and swimming
at Iii dway Park Pool. In fact, 1 jumped in and taught several classes
of sw:trn,i'.n; at I-iiciwai Pool. 1 WU a quelifioo Rod Cross 3winmi:tng
Instructor and I enjoy helping others to conquer their fear of water.
I fuel that I can bo of service to others by helping them to swim,
thus helping them to have a safer and more enjoyable life.
Drowning is still the fourth major cause of death in our country
today. We have an awesome responsibility in keeping this rate down
by providing swimming and life-saving instruction. '
Midway Park Pool has been so over crowded for tho Loot two suimaers
that it made no nervous to take my children there. It has ceased
to be a relaxing experience in any way for adults because of the
over-load and inadequate swimming area. In the past Midway Park
Pool has served as a wonderful source of recreation and instruction
for our rainy. However, I feel it .ias ceased to meet the needs of
our community. We need a pool to take care of all the families
that are hero alus the man; that have boon projected to come into
our area. Midway lark Pool can not possibly do this)
E. : €'1, EIYED
SEP 101969
CITY OF EULESS
- 40•00 mmig) -
2 ,
,
C., Along with our other well planned re.:reational facilities, I would
like to ace you include n multi-purpose Olympic size pool similar
to tho city pool of Denton, Texas, Forest Park pool of Fort dorthl
o r Chisolm Park Pool of Hurst. ( Chisolm Park is not as ideal as
the other two because diving facilities are riot seperated from the
swimming area. The other pools mentioned have diving wells as well
as shallow areas for non-swimmers seperate from the swimming lanes. )
Swimming in an all family sport and one that meets the needs of
young and old alfEe. By furnishing our citizens a pool you would -
afford than an opportunity for exercise, relaxation, vital instruoa.
tion ti t: t coull nave 'Jives, as ioll as many inoxponsivo hours of
family fun.
I realize th 're are many facets to developing an all round recreation
program. I also realize that you cannot please all of the people
all of the time. I do, however, think that you would provide more x, -
recreation for more pooplo by building a pool than in any other way.„,
If there is any way that I can help to make this dream come to
reality in our city, piens° lot me know.
Thank you for your t.;ne and consideration of this matter of impor-
tance for all our citizens.
Sincerely, .
I .
1(.,a,
ti).)..._
hrs. Nelson Joriles
•
....
,
. ,
..
4-, ,
-
Attachment #2
27 August 1969
;g 64116 f6
•fri
Mayor Pete Krause and
% �.e...
Members of the City Council
City Hall
Euless, Texas 76039
Mr. Mayor and Council Members: VW"
Subsequent to much thought and consideration and after soliciting
opinions of other concerned citizens of Euless, I am convinced that
new and better public recreation facilities should be provided. The
current facilities available to the youth of our city are much too
limited.
Among the most pressing needs, in the writer's opinion, are lit-
tle league ball parks and a modern 50-meter olympic style swimming
pool. These items are expensive, of course, as are most worth-while
construction projects. Limited funds are perennial problems and are
often of such magnitude that some badly needed projects must be post-
poned. If it becomes evident that the city of Euless must choose between
the above-mentioned recreational facility projects because of financial
limitations, it is the considered opinion of this tax-paying citizen that
such a choice should be in favor of the swimming pool. Some reasons why
the olympic type swimming pool should have first priority are listed be-
low:
1. Swimming represents an active physical entertainment
activity for all. ages.
•
2. Swimming is not restricted to a particular sex.
3. Swimming is one of the best "total body" physical „
exercises available, according to noted physicians.
Consequently, a contribution to better health.
4. A well-planned swimming facility would be self-sus-
taining and could, conceivably, provide an income through
such means as:
s. � 1. x
AUG 69
CITY C = : , .SS ;,
fir. ...,.. ..wn.:..ywwww.*-s.. ....v.: ....: ..,y�M.+w.q wsn,V roM.:w.: ' •1.i*4F'r'^r,Vi',. t .,� ,.. .,.,a...x .. ,«,w..'«., r.w....x...r...w oek"
Mayor Pete Krause and
Members of the City Council
27 August 1969
Page 2
a. Admittance fees for public swimming.
b. Admittance fees from swim meets such as the AAU
and junior olympics.
c. Admittance fees for various community affairs.
d. Tuition fees for private swimming lessons.
5. A swimming pool offers a low cost-to-benefit ratio.
6. A new facility, such as Chisholm Park in Hurst, Forest
Park in Fort Worth, or other local facilities would be
an asset to the city, bringing added income to Euless
businesses from out-of-town visitors during swim meets,
etc. , and would help attract new families to this area.
Through good leadership and a concerned citizenry, Euless can keep
pace with the demands of a growing city and be the envy of its neighbors. '
Let us strive toward that end.
t '
Respectfully,
David t. Agan
507 Yorkshire Drive
Euless, Texas •
DEA/nfs
Attachment #4
June 25, 1969
SWIMMING POOL REPORT
According to our figures, the total income of Midway Park Pool to this date
is $5,099.50. This exceeds last year by $404.00. This gain is in part due
to season ticket sales.
Total attendance at the pool as of June 24 is 7,594, which leads last year 's
figure by 2,351 .
The state regulations for public pools specify 70 swimmers per lifeguard. We
exceed this ratio at least during three or four hours per day in good weather.
There are times when as many as 250 swimmers are in the pool . I just wanted
you to know that we are continuing to outgrow our pool despite the Trinity
Program.
I checked with Mr. Keaton of Dallas on their success in school pools for the
summer program. They have six school (indoor) pools open this summer for rec-
reation purposes. None are doing well , while the municipal pools are doing
above average business, which indicates that people like to get out in the
sun and open air to swim. Perhaps we should not be too regretful about missing
out on the Trinity Pool .
I also talked with Mr. Frick of Fort Worth about the Eastern Hills pool . It
is not open yet, and they are having negotiation problems with the school sys-
tem, despite the fact of their well-thought-out contract, now in existence.
Frank Lindsey
Parks and Recreation
8`y ,.n w rrra an*rrillra� lylq�l
d , if{In n4win R"
? °" 1. s
i t rfC f.,41 #4{. :,
4
Attachment #6 ''y
i.
•
EULESS RECREATION DEPARTMENT
COMPARATIVE ATTENDANCE STATISTICS
z'
i
a;
•
'
s
' Community Buildin �°�
9 August 1968 - July 1969 l61 ,348
Recreation Program Summer 1968
37,591
Summer 1969
•
30,388
'Midway Pool . , , Summer 1968
21 ,657 '. ,•Summer 1969 (est )
_. .._.._..._ 23,000
. tM1dway Park Baseball Summer 19E8 -
Summer 1969 45,005
`� 9 9 �eSt ) 46 000 $ 6
.-.�
m
. . : ..
•
' ,-'2,,'•:, -,...,:.. -
(` ...
•
•
•
•
. x {
•
'
•
N
r
,
•
a m>,
ti {� M;,
•
_,
Attachment # 7 4
j
,. • #'
rf C4c,
September 16, '1969 .�x�;i,
r',r
,, .
i,?.
',
rl 3},,,,,,.
Euless City Council
Eulesr., Tes:ef-; ; , y,.
,,r
Gentlemen:
At the last business meeting, the Euless Athletic Association disatsse :
plans ler a building and elected to submit a proposal to the City Counci3
and City Park <.nd Reel-cation Committee. The need for space to store,.-xJ e-
uniform and baseball equipment, in the off season, has become acute; 4...' , . '
,
, ,
-,.,,,z1
Since Ne previously used a storage building that has been outgrown an4 rc; : ;»`•
the lard on which it is located is soon to be taken by the new airport, .
'..'', 4,',.'..'', 4,',..,
the Euless Athletic Association proposes a building to be erected In - 4„2.4
�.,.
f
Midwa7 Park by the City that could serve the needs of the baseball ".,„,.1,-
progrE m and also include much needed restrooms . a;: .
i•' ,
Realizing this typo of facility would be no small expenditure, the Association
would contribute up to $2,000 toward the cost, with the understanding sr ,. '
9 `
the stc'rage space included would be adequate to support the basebalt needs;
and W( Ialrl be made available for its use . g` 0.:..,
Your c onsideration-in the matter would be greatly appreciated. .� h
Very truly yours,
< - =.,-,, 4,
7f:6,/,,,,,./:,,,,„,.,. ,
c._, . , •B
B. L. Y'rbrough, ecretary t ke- .
Euless Athletic Association ` .
BLYA;b
it n 5 .
cc: Parks R Recreation Committee ,
4.
...
w,w.+ice{
'
$i; it
stn 1 ) AJ i n
Attachment #8 ""
4.''.
January 9, 1970 :
Chairman
Parks and recreation Board
City of Euless
Euless, Texas �b ..
Dear Chuck:
am'.
. • The Euless Athletic Association has the following •,� t ,' •
recommendations for improvements and repairs to -
the baseball fields in Midway Park: r
r. +.r..... * e ,
1— We feel• that field #2 should have double the existing ; -
' lighting and remove the poles from the playing field. T,
2- On ft�1d #3 the fence is in bad need of repair. °+' •
44
3— Field /fl; needs a gate installed, as well as existing - y
• gate loc cs repaired. y .,
LE- We also recommend that the fields be wateredaand ,- '
fertiliz(ld
during the baseball
0eason. a
. - r
The E;ulens athletic Association wishes to obtain °'
- • your permission to use the baseball field at VV . ;V
Central Jr. High for the fifteen and sixteen year
boy; , if necessary.
Thank you for ,� �;_ ,
Y your concern and attention toward ,.;_
our baseball association. r ' '
�.j
'w
Since a '-�.. 4
Y s
;
7,//// � G ';724--Qe, ---�_ _____ --'_,` "
BOB J ON �
Preston r '.
Euless Athletic Association
pt
f c>} ' .
5 s'
a
41114me *4-4
L. Attachment #9
1 . Acquisition of 20 acres of land for
Park Site along Bear Creek $30,000.00 to $60,000.00
To be reimbursed by Metropolitan
Development Program (2)J
2. Purchase of 3 or 4 acres
for Swimming Pool Site 6,000.00 to 12,000.00
3. Construction of Swimming Pool $176,000.00
4. Engineering Study and planning
layout of Park and Pool site
5. Construction of Restroomm
Utility building 7,000.00
6. Baseball Diamond Lighting
Improvements (Midway Park) 4,000.00
TOTAL $229,000.00
AVAILABLE 210,000.00
NEEDED FROM OTHER SOURCES $ 19,000.00
PARK & RECREATION FUNDS ON DEPOSIT IN LOCAL BANK $100,000.00
YET UNSOLD 1970 PARK AND RECREATION BOND 110,000.00
AVAILABLE $210,000.00