Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1969-04-15 t 1 Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission April 15, 1969 CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 8: 10 P. M. , in the Council Chambers of Euless City Hall , with Chairman Leonard Weber presiding. Members present are listed as follows: Messrs. Jack Browne, Richard Lande and Bill Tench. Also present were City Inspector Jack Bullard and Recording Secretary Florence Murr. VISITORS Visitors present are listed as follows: Messrs. and Mesdms. Richard Moon, Gerald Tyler, James Payne, Victor Bufo, A. R. Veal , Reece N. Smith, and Hugh Waite; Messrs. Gale Stafford, Carl J. Farina, Jr. , Mike Allen, Ken Good, Robert Power, D. A. Martin, Lawrence C. Calloway, William R. Shedd, Rudy Rogers, Piers Chance, Herschel Sanders, James Waddle, and Jim D. Baccus; Mesdms. Doyle W. Ricks, Ronald Thomas, Norma Morelock, Sally Waddle, Dixie Love, Doyle England, Jimmy Vest, C. L Pytter, Reed J. Keffer, and Linda Taylor. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of the regular meeting dated April 1 , 1969, were approved as written. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING CASE 188, REQUEST OF G & C PROPERTIES FOR REZONING LOT 4 AND THE EAST 17. 1 FEET OF LOT 3, BLOCK A, VILLA WEST ADDITION, FROM "R-3" MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO "C-2" COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT Chairman Weber opened the Public Hearing on Zoning Case 188, to consider the request of G f. C Properties for the rezoning of Lot 4 and the East 17. 1 feet of Lot 3, Block A, Villa West Addition, from "R-3" Multi - Family Dwelling Dsitrict to "C-2" Community Business District. Chairman Weber recognized Mr. Gale Stafford, a representative for G & C Properties, who briefed the Commission on the property in question, pointing out that adjacent tracts are primarily C-2, the exception being the property to the East, which is zoned "R-3" and that located to the South, which is zoned "C-2" and "R-3". Mr. Stafford advised that the property in question is included klein a Final Plat which is to be presented for consideration later this evening. 1 Pa•e Two Re.ular Meetin• of the Piann n• and Zonin. Commission ' •ril 1 1 .6• Mr. Browne inquired concerning the location of the property in question, in relation to the First Baptist Church. Mr. Bullard advised that the property in question is located South of Spur 350, and First Baptist Church is located North of Spur 350. Chairman Weber called for opponents to this rezoning request. There being none, the Public Hearing was closed. Doctor Lande made the motion to recommend approval of Zoning Case No. 188, rezoning Lot 4 and the East 17.1 feet of Lot 3, Block A, Villa West Addition, from "R-3" Multi-Fanily Dwelling District to "C-2" Community Business District, as requested by G & C Properties, providing all City requirements are met. Mr. Browne seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Doctor Lande, Messrs. Browne and Tench Nays: None Chairman Weber declared the motion carried. 11. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING CASE 189,, RE P UEST OF MR E S CHANC FOR REZONING 7.91 ACRES O,UTOOF P. HALFORD SURVEY, ABSTRACT 71T; FROM "R-1" SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO "R-3" MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TRICT Chairman Weber opened the Public Hearing on Zoning Case No. 189, and recognized Messrs. Piers Chance and Herschel Sanders, of Mayflower Investment Company. Mr. Sanders advised that Mayflower Investment Company made a study of the area and considers "R-3" zoning to be the highest and best use for the property in question. Mr. Chance advised that his firm is not the Developer that they offer the property for sale, and the proposed change of zoning is a condition of the sale. At the request of Mr. Browne, Mr. Chance pointed out the location of the property on the City's Official Zoning Map, and on the Master Plan prepared by the City's Land Planner, Mr. Robert Caldwell. In reply to a question, Mr. Chance advised that the existing Elementary School (Midway Park) is located South of the property in question. Mr. Bullard advised Members of the Commission that the property is located within the green belt proposed on the City's Master Plan. Pate Three •e•ular Meetin• of the Plannin• and Zonin• Commission Aril 1 1 •6• Chairman Weber advised that he has before him several petitions, bearing signatures of citizens who are opposed to this rezoning request. Chairman Weber asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak in opposition to the request. Mr. Richard Moon, who resides at 508 Ector, advised that he is opposed to transients who would be living in the area if the property is zoned for apartments. Mr. Moon advised that this is the feeling of most of the property owners in the area. Mr. Tench asked Mr. Moon if he is aware of the petitions which were circulated and inquired if the signers were property owners. Mr. Moon advised that he is of the opinion the majority of the persons who signed the petitions are property owners. Mrs. Joyce Tyler stated that she lives at 603 Aransas -- that she did not receive a Notice of Public Hearing and did not get to sign a petition -- that she is opposed to the rezoning for many reasons. Her primary reason is that there are already many children in the neighborhood and she considers that apartments would bring in more -- that the schools are already full . Mrs. Anthony Veal, 803 Ector, stated that she is a home owner and, is opposed to apartments in the area because the schools are already over-crowded -- that her daughter is a teacher at Midway Park Elementary, where she has thirty-two children in her class -- that she has lived in apartments and knows there are usually numerous children. Mrs. Veal stated further that Ector is already heavily traveled and it is a matter of concern to the neighborhood. Mr. Doyle Ricks, 510 Ector, advised that he has no children at this time, but he sees all the children -- that he carried one of the petitions and the people who signed were home owners -- that only one person refused, and she had recently sold her home to be used for rent property. Mr. Jim 0. Bacpus, who resides at 608 Midway advised that the traffic has increased since the extension of Midway -- that granting this rezoning would be a foot in the door for more apartments to be constructed in the area -- that citizens of the area were under the impression that this would remain a residential area, they object to crowding of the schools and increased traffic. Mr. Baccus stated that he has seen the apartment houses here in Euless and he does not want that around his residence. Chairman Weber stated that the crowding of schools is another. problem which concerns Hurst-Euless-Bedford School District, rather than the City of Euless -- that, In his opinion, this Board is concerned only with matters pertaining to the City. CO) (Page Four t Regular Meeting of the Planni99 and Zoning Commissions April 15, 196 ) Mrs. Reed Keffer, 817 Ector, stated that she has no children, but has dogs -- that they were of the impression this was a residential area and have made improvements to their property. Mrs. Keffer stated that apart- ment dwellers do not pay near the taxes as home owners -- that she was previously an apartment dweller and that apartment dwellers do not give anything to the community in the way of taxes. Mrs. Keffer stated that the traffic on Ector is bad -- that, in her opinion, a stop sign should be installed at the dip on Ector. Mrs. Keffer stated further that apartments usually tend to "run down" after a few years and owners do not care for them properly -- that this usually results in a lower class of tenants -- that this would lower the value of property in the neighborhood and she is of the opinion they should have better people in her heighborhood. Mr. Jim Baccus advised that he is aware that over-crowded shcools is the School Board's problem; however, he fears that it might be necessary for citizens living near the school to take their children to some other school . Mr. James Payne, 605 Aransas, stated that he is opposed to this rezoning request because he was under the impression this would remain a single family dwelling district. Mr. Reece Smith, 604 Midway, stated that he is also opposed becuase he is of the opinion it should remain a single family dwelling district. Mr. Rudy Ro9ers, 709 Fayette, stated that he is a property owner and is opposed to apartments.-- that, in his opinion, Mayflower is in business to make money and they want to make money -- that someone should build some houses on the property in question. Mrs. Anthony Veal stated that she was present at the previous council meeting, at which time F similar zoning case was being considered -- that Councilman Douglass stated that school officials are not in favor of apartments near schools. Mrs. Doyle Ricks stated that the traffic on Ector is bad -- so bad that a 4-way stop sign was recently installed at Midway and Ector. Mr. James A. Waddle advised that he lives at 607 Midway, which is at the comer of the tract in question, and that he does not want apartments constructed by his residence. Mr. David Martin stated that he lives on Eastcliff and is oppossed to apartments. Mr. Martin asked the Developers why this site was chosen and commented that he is tired of people coming in and rezoning property next to single family dwellings that, in his opinion, it must stop soon. Pa.e Five Re.ular Meetin• of the Plannin. and Zonin• Commission Aril 1 1•69) Chairman Weber recognized Mr. Sanders of Mayflower Investment Company, who stated that he does not feel responsible for the schools or the traffic. Mr. Sanders commented that these are by-products of progress in the City. Mr. Sanders advised that their evaluation tells that this property is best suited for apartment dwellings -• that this is the highest and best use for the property. Mr. Sanders advised that his firm would, . with the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation, withdraw their request for this zoning and submit plans for a Planned Development, for approval by the City. Mr. .Sanders stated that, in his opinion, this is not necessary; however, his firm would be willing to accept such a recommendation to apply under site planned district, in order to avoid any problems and to assure proper screening of the property from the perimeter developments to the South, East and West. Mrs. Barbara Thomas, 703.Fayette, inquired concerning site planning. Chairman.Weber advised that, basically, they would screen off their apartment area with a fence along the perimeters, separating it from the single family dwellings. Mr. Sanders stated that his firm does not propose to develop the property -- that they do not feel the burden of controlling traffic -- that they look at the property's highest and best use consistent with the area. Mr. Sanders advised that the traffic system was taken into consideration in their study -- that Midway is not residential that there is some commercial property there, and that traffic is going to grow -- that you cannot suppress growth. Mrs. Ricks stated that screening the property will not prevent the cars from coming up Ector. Chairman Weber explained that the screening would separate the apartment development from the residential area. Doctor Lande asked if the proposed zoning would fit into the Master Plan. The City Inspector advised that the area designated as a green belt is usually reserved for parks, playground and schools. A gentleman in the audience commented that we have two of the most modern schools in the country located in Euless, and he considers that apartments would not be favorable to the area. Chairman Weber advised that, regardless of the decision reached by the Planning and Zoning Commission, this zoning case will go to the City Council •- that a date for Public Hearing will be called, and notice of that date will be published in the newspaper at least fifteen days prior to the Public Hearing. (Pa.e Six Re•ular Meetin. of the Plannin. and Zonin• C. ission Aril 1 14'5' A citizen asked where there is commercially zoned property on Midway. Mr. Bullard advised that 300 feet at Midway and Highway 157 is zoned commercial , and the remainder is near North Main Street. A lady in the audience advised that she is an apartment dweller -- that she does not wish to live in a residential area -- that she would prefer to live in a large apartment development, where there are no children. She stated that she values something that she owns highly; however, living in an apartment she doesn't have the desire to increase the value and does not properly care for her apartment therefore, the value of the property might decrease. Chairman Weber declared the Public Hearing closed. Mr. Weber stated that he would like to clarify the matter concerning payment of taxes on apartments -- that considerable revenue is paid by apartment owners in the form of taxes. Mrs. Keffer stated that she is aware of this -- that she meant that the tenants did not pay taxes. Mr. Browne commented 'that in his opinion, Mayflower Investment Company has contributed materially to the establishment of Euless -- that they had a planned development complex. Mr. Browne stated that we Leed enough apartments and business in the area •- that he considers Mayflower Investment Company should be given credit for their contribution to the CIty. Mr. Browne commented that a great many people reside in Midway Park, who contribute to the City, and in his opinion, Mayflower has sufficient land on Highway 157, Harwood and North Main Street that denial of rezoning of this 7.914 acre tract will not create a financial disaster to them. Mr. Browne made the motion to recommend denial of the request for rezoning 7.914 acres out of the J. P. Halford Survey, Abstract 711 , from "R-1" Single Family Dwelling District to "R-3" Multiple Family Dwelling District, as requested by Mr. Piers Chance (Zoning Case No. 189) . Doctor Lande seconded the motion and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Messrs. Browne, Lande and Tench Nays: None Chairman Weber declared the motion carried. (Page Seven, Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, April 15, 1969) III . PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING CASE 190 REQUEST OF MR. ROBERT H. POWER FOR REZONING $2 ACRES OUT OF THE SOLOMON HUITT SURVEY, ABSTRACT 705, FROM "R-1" SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DiSTRIcT TO "R-3" MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT Chairman Weber opened the Public Hearing on Zoning Case No. 190, to consider the request of Mr. Robert H. Power for rezoning 82 acres out of the Solomon Huitt Survey, Abstract 705, from "R-1" Single Family Dwelling District to "R-3" Multiple Family Dwelling District. Chairman Weber recognized Mr. Power, who stated that he represents Mr. Bert Heyl , owner of the property. Mr. Power advised that Mr. Heyl is contemplating the sale of this property and the rezoning is a part of the contingency. Mr. Power stated ti,at he'does not have any interest -- that he is merely an attorney representing a client. Mr. Power cormented 'that it has been most interesting to listen to the discussion held concerning the other zoning cases this evening. Mr. Power stated that the comments made tonight are comments which a person must make when he looks upon a proposed rezoning, trying to decide what is the proper decision to make. Mr. Power commented that the City of Euless is faced with a situation similar to Irving with only so much land to develop, and it must be developed in a proper manner. Mr. Power advised that a request for rezoning of this property was filed; after giving thought and consideration as to whether or not this is the highest and best use -- that he and the developer have looked at , the surrounding property -- that the Commission's responsibility is to protect the property owners, as well as to utilize the property. Mr. Power referred to another zoning request which he presented recently (Zoning Case No. 179) commenting that, at that time they considered it good zoning and believe it will be asset to the City of Euless. Mr. Power stated that they cannot say that they have a specific plan for every footage they propose -- that they do not have, but in the future there must be a determination concerning use of the land -- that this must be determined now. Mr. Powers commented that, although the development time may not be here, he is of the opinion the zoning time is present, in order for citizens to be notified; thereby, avoiding dissension and opposition as was experienced earlier this evening. Mr. Power advised that the property in question constitutes approximately eighty-two (82) acres, which without question, could be developed into one of the most tremendous developments -- not crowded, you can expand out and make it appealing to people, and a high rent yield can be maintained. Mr. Power stated that this is an area which will allow for public (Pa.e Ei .ht Re.ular Meetin• of the Plannin. and Zonin• Commission Aril 1 1 •6- thoroughfares, in accordance with desires of the City. Mr. Powers advised that it is his understanding Hurst-Euless-Bedford Independent School District is considering a possible location for a school site in this area -- that approximately eight acres has been omitted from this rezoning request, and if the school is interested, the owner will try to work with them on that property on a near cost basis, or possibly, cost arrangement. Mr. Power pointed out that property adjacent on the North is undeveloped and on the West is a major thoroughfare which will and can carry considerable traffic. Mr. Power advised that the proposed apartment develop- ment will be planned from a road standpoint to go over to the East, so that people can travel In that direction, which will alleviate traffic problems. Mr. Power stated that he realizes that plans will have to be agreeable to the City's Departments -- that he considers this to be the highest and best use for the property and urges the Commission 's recognizing this as what is best for the City. Mr. Browne inquired concerning the location of the creek in relation to the property in question. Mr. Power advised that it separates the property -- that the Developer plans to leave a tract on each side of the creek, and to landscape the area. In reply to a question, Mr. Power advised that he did not request rezoning of the property adjacent to North Main Street. Mr. Hugh Waite, Developer of Somerset Place, advised that, at the request of the City Council , he and Mr. Heyl met, prior to the approval of Zoning Case No. 179, in an effort to determine a workable plan for all concerned. Mr. Waite presented a sketch indicating the zoning, as approved by the Council . Mr. Waite presented another drawing, including the property in question, which if approved Indicates an overlapping of apartments and single family dwellings. Mr. Waite stated that he does not consider this a problem -- that the proposed school site will be advantageous; however, if the school site materializes, Newport Way will have to dead end, as It cannot be extended through the school property. Mr. Waite stated that he would like assurance that, should the School District fail to purchase this site, the zoning of that property will remain "R-1" -- that he would be opposed to any other type of zoning. Mr. Waite advised that the zoning requested tonight will not be to his advantage; however, he is willing to go along with the request -- that, in the event it is approved, he may, at some future date, request apartment zoning for a small tract consisting of approximately six (6) acres. Mr. Waite stated that he would like assuarance from the purchaser of Mr. Heyl 's property that he will not object to this request, should it materialize. Mr. Kenneth Good, purchaser of Mr. Heyl 's towtract advised that he would not oppose this request but would welcome it. (Page Nines Reguiar Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commissions April 15, 1969) Mr. Waite advised that he and his associates are installing a storm sewer and opening a channel to the creek •- that they would like to be advised concerning negotiations with TRA for extending the sewer line -- that a lift station is being installed and he would like to be assured that he can dispose of the lift station and have the sewerage carried into the new system. Mr. Bullard advised that the TRA sewerage line should be completed within the next 18 months. At the request of Mr. Tench, Mr. Waite pointed out his property and the property in question on the Master Plan. Mr. Waite advised that it is all in the yellow area, which represents single family zoning, commenting that, in his opinion, the highest and best use for the property is apartments. Mr. Waite inquired concerning the type of construction that is proposed for the apartment development. Mr. Ken Good, proposed purchaser, stated that he proposes to construct a first class facility, which will be built, owned, operated and maintained by his firm. Mr. Good commented that not every town has the nation's largest airport, and they propose a facility which the City will be proud of. Mr. Good stated that many people will be moving into the area, creating a demand for first class housing. Mrs. Virginia Copher stated that she is opposed to this zoning request. Mrs. Gopher commented that this land has been zoned and designated as a single family residential area and, in her opinion, it should remain as such. As there were no other proponents or opponents in this zoning request, Chairman Weber declared the Public Hearing closed. In reply to a question from Mr. Harold Copher, Mr. Good advised that his firm proposes to develop the area in several phases -- with from 100 to 200 units in each -- that one area will be set aside for families, and other areas for tenants who do not have children. Mr. Good stated that they will not do any site work for, possibly, a year; however, plans will be started immediately, and that an apartment project requires extensive planning. In a lengthy discussion which followed, Mr. Good advised that the proposed greenbelt will be used by the City, if it is dedicated -- that he does not have a definite land plan, at this time -- that he does not propose the condominium concept. Mr. Tench made a motion to recommend that the Euless City Council deny Mr. Robert Power's request for rezoning 82 acres out of the Solomon Huitt Survey, Abstract 705 (Zoning Case No. 190) , from "R-1" Single Family (Page Ten, Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, April 15, 1969) Dwelling District to "R-3" Multiple Fancily Dwelling District, because he considers the rezoning is premature and in conflict with the City's Master Plan. Mr. Browne seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Messrs. Tench, Browne and Lande Nays: None Chairman Weber declared the motion carried. IV. INTRODUCTION OF CQUNilLMAN- ELECT, MR. HAROLD GOPHER Mr. Jack Bullard introduced Mr. Harold Gopher, who was recently elected Councilman, Place 2 of the Euless City Council . V. CONSIDER FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, REPLATTING OF TRACT 12, RAY SHELTON SUBDIVISION. DOCTOR RICHARD J. THOMES Mr. Tench made the motion to table this item, for lack of representation on the part of the Developer. Doctor Lande seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Messrs. Tench, Lande and Browne Nays: None Chairman Weber declared the motion carried. VI . CONSIDER PLAT APPROVAL OF PLAT REVISION. PORTION OF A TRACT OUT OF THE A. J. HUITT SURVEY AND PORTION OF TRACT A. BLOCK 15. OAKWOOD TERRACE ADDITION. 5TH FILING. MR. FRANK DOUGLASS, Mr. Tench made the motion to table this item, for lack of representation on the part of the Developer. Doctor Lande seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows; Ayes: Messrs. Tench, Lande and Browne Nays: None cir Chairman Weber declared the motion carried. (Pa•e Eleven Re•ular Meetin• of the Plannin. =nd Zonin• C. is ion Aril 1 1•6• Vii. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, VILLA WEST ADDITION, SECOND INSTALLMENT Mr. Gale Stafford, representing G & C Porperties advised that he is desirous of preliminary plat approval of Villa West Addition, Second Installment, and final plat approval on a portion of it. Chairman Weber referred to a letter dated April 3, 1969, from the City's Consulting Engineers, which states as follows: On the preliminary plan the storm sewer configuration is not compatible with the storm sewer proposed in the Spur 350 apartment community which abuts this property on the North. Since that project is already approved for construction we would feel that either this plan should be revised or the Developers of the Spur 350 project should be contacted by this Developer and the two plans coordinated. We are not aware whether the instrument establishing a maintenance agreement on the drainage channel adjacent to Highway 157, which was executed for the first installment of this project, also covered this section North of Villa Drive. We would suggest the instrument be checked by the City Attorney to make certain this section of the channel is covered." $r♦ Stafford pointed out the storm sewer referred to by the City's Consulting Engineers, stating that he has talked with a representative of Basil George's Investment Company, Developers of the apartment community on Spur 350 •- that G & C Properties proposes a street in the Final Plat- ting of the property in question and Basil Georgess representative assured him that they will give the matter consideration, Mr* Stafford advised that the Final Plat being considered this evening does not include the easement -- that the easement is located on the adjoining lot. Chairman Weber referred to another letter from the City's Consulting Engineers dated April 3, 1969, addressed to City Manager C. J. Griggs, which stated as follows= "In addition to the comments made to the Planning and Zoning Commission on the subject project, we also understand that the Developer agreed during the review of the first installment that Villa Drive would not be cut for service lines to the North and that sewer service for those tracts would be provided to the East and West. We feel that this should be a requirement and that Villa Drive should not be cut unless absolutely necessary." Mr. Bullard explained that the City's Engineers propose that the sewer line should be extended down the front or the back of the property, rather than making street cuts in order to tie into the existing sewer line which is located in the street (Villa Drive). (Pa.e Twelve e•ular Meetin. of the Plannin and Zonin. Commission Aril 1 1•6• Mr. Stafford stated that G C Properties installed the sewer line serving Villa West, First Installment, in the street, improved the street and dedicated it to the City. Mr. Bullard advised that when plans for Villa West, First Installment were submitted, Mr. Grantland was informed that he needed to sewer the property properly at that time, Mr. Grantland stated that he would lay another sewer line if necessary, to prevent cutting the street. Mr. Stafford commented that his firm was of the opinion, at that time, that adequate sewer lines had been installed. Mr. Stafford stated that his firm knows how to patch a street properly -- Villa Drive is a new street and, in his opinion, a patch will hold. In a discussion of installation of sewer lines, it was determined that only two cuts in Villa Drive would be necessary. Chairman Weber stated that, in his opinion, building another line would be placing a burden of expense on the Developers. The City Inspector advised that there is an existing eight (8) inch tap, which could take care of part of the subdivision. Mr. Tench inquired concerning the possibility of tunneling under the street and installing the lines. Mr. Stafford stated that, in his opinion, this would not be as strong as a properly filled cut. Chairman Weber asked Mr. Stafford if his firm is agreeable to execute a maintenance agreement on the drainage channel . Mr. Stafford stated that he and his associates will sign another maintenance agreement, if the existing agreement does not cover all of the property. Doctor Linde made the motion to approve the Preliminary Plat of Villa West Addition, Second Installment and the Final Plat for Lots 1 , 2, 3, and 4, Villa West Addition, Second Installment, subject to compliance with the recommendations outlined in letters dated April 3, 1969, from the City's Consulting Engineers. Mr. Tench seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Messrs. Browne, Lande and Tench. Nays: None Chairman Weber declared the motion carried. two (Page Thirteen, Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, April 15, 1969) VIII. RESOLUTION NO. 139. CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING CASE NO. 191 . REQUESTED BY MESSRS. LEO F. CORRIGAN AND EDWIN B. JORDAN Mr. Jack Browne made the motion to approve Resolution No. 139, setting May 6, 1969, as the date for Public Hearing on the request of Messrs. Leo F. Corrigan and Edwin B. Jordan for rezoning Lots 7, 9, 11 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19, Block A, Sheppard Addition, from "R-l" Single Family Dwelling District to "R-3" Multiple Family Dwelling District. Mr. Tench seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows= Ayes: Messrs. Browne, Tench and Lande Nays: None Chairman Weber declared the motion carried. IX. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10:05 P. M. APPROVED; ATTEST Secretary fsm;dfh