HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-06-13Regular Meeting
Euless City Council
June 13, 1978
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Euless City
Counci 1 was cal led to order at 8: 05 p.m., in the Counci 1 Chambers of Euless
City Hall by Mayor Harold Semuels. Other members present were Messrs.
Raymond Ozebek, Charles Hunt, Glenn Walker, Robert P i p p i n , and Mrs. W i l l i e
Mae McCormick.
Also present were City Manager W. M.
Sostai re, City Secretary Della Houy, City Attorney Bob McFarland, City
Engineer Greg Dickens, and Assistant City Manager John Lynch, IV.
VISITORS
Visitors in 'attendence were Messrs. San
Cotten, Mike D'Angli, Al Jarrell, Gary N, Johnson, Rick Barnes, Roy L. Lee,
and Mrs. Myrtle Hall.
INVOCATION
,... The invocation was given by Mayor Harold
Samuels,
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting dated
May 23, 1978, were approved as writ ten .
FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF RATE INCREASE
REQUESTED BY TEXAS POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
Mr. Gary Johnson, Manager of Texas Power
and Light Company, read a list of the cities that have made some decision
regarding the proposed rate increase request of Texas Power and Light
Company.
Mayor Samuels inquired if the rate, as
approved by the Public Utility Commission, would be put into effect if a
city could not approve an ordinance on two readings before June 26, 1978?
Mr. Johnson stated the legislative time
table expires on June 26th, so Texas Power and Light Company has no other
choice than to put the rate into effect on all bills on or after June 26th?
(Page Two, Regular Meeting, Euless City Council, June 13. 1978)
Mr. Pippin inquired what date the Public
Utility Commission ruled on the Irving case?
Mr. Jarrell stated the interim order was
issued on May 30th, the date the PUC confirmed the appeals hearing date of
July 10th, and issued orders to Texas Power and Light to begin collecting
the revised rate of $41.2 million as of June 1st.
Mr. Hunt stated the Public Utility Commission
has approved $41.2 million, and inquired if Mr. Johnson had the figure that the
Touche -Ross study recommended?
Mr. Johnson stated he did not.
Mr. Pippin stated $35.017 million.
Mrs. McCormick moved to accept the Public
Utility Commission's ruling for a $41.2 million increase.
Mrs. McCormick stated she would 1 ike the
paragraph from the Mayor' s letter regarding the City of Irving, to be included
in the minutes,
The Public Utility Commtssionhas also struck down the Irving
ordinance which would haee accomplished two things for Irving,
had the PUC allowed it to stand. First, Irving approved a rate
increase less than allowed by the Public Utility Commission, and
second, the Irving, ordinance did not allow any increase or pass
through for the fuel adjustment clause. I was told by the local
TP &L manager, Gary Johnson, that TP &L would put the Irving rate
into effect immediately by posting a bond with the PUC.
Mayor Samuels stated__in the last ordinance
that was approved, the Council included that if any other lower rates went
into effect it would also be applicable to the City of Euless, and if the
Council approves an ordinance, he thinks this should be included,
Mrs. McCormick stated she would amend her
motion to include that if any lower rates went into effect in any other city,
it would be applicable to the City of Euless.
The motion was made awaiting a second.
Mrs. McCormick's motion died for lack of
a second.
Mr. Pippin inquired what action would be
taken if the Council enacted the Touche -Ross recommendation?
Mayor Samuels stated the ordinance would not
(Page Thre?....ELagular Meeting, Euless City Council, June 23, 1978)
go into effect until the Council approved it on second reading on June 27th,
and the PUC rate would go into effect on June 26th.
Mayor Samuels stated his recommendation
is that the Council should take no action, if they are not inclined to
concur with the PUC ruling.
Mr, Hunt inquired if the City of Euless
did not participate in the study made by Tduche -Ross?
Mr. Sustaire stated yes, and Euless was
listed in the PUC final order.
Mr. Hunt inquired if &he $35.017 million
recommended by Touche -Ross is not also the recommendation of the Texas
Municipal League.
Mr. Johnson stated that the Texas
Municipal League hired Touche -Ross, INC., to make a study and that is what
Touche -Ross recommended to the Public Utility Commission,
Mr. McFarland stated Touche -Ross was
hired as an intervener for the cities by the Texas Municipal League, and the
$35.017 million was recommended to the Touche -Ross Company.
Mr. Hunt stated that the amount recommended
by Touche -Ross is too high a figure, but in -as -much as it is a lesser figure
than the $41.2 million figure that the Public Utility Commission approved,
he would move that the City Council concur with the Touche -Ross recommendation
of $35.017 million, since the City actually supported and were a part of the
study.
Mayor Samuels stated our only concern is
the citizens of Euless and we can't save the citizens any money, no matter
what we do, because ultimately the citizens are going to pay the same amount
for their electricity.
Mr. Pippin stated that is conceding the
point, that the City does not have original jurisdiction any more, He stated
there were some definite questions brought up by the Touche -Ross report, but
he w i l l second the motion.
Mr. Hunt restated his motion as concurring
with the Touche -Ross recommendation of $35.017 million, and he is of the
opinion that it is an excessive amount, based on some of the previous testi-
mony, but the City has participated in the Touche -Ross study, and if the
City doesn't recognize their efforts, the City wasted their money, He stated
the only reason he made the motion for this rate increase is because it is
the lesser amount that the City might possibly be able to live with.
(Page Four, Regular Meeting, Euless City Council, June 13, 1978)
Mr. Walker stated Mr. Hunt made a good point
in that the City did help pay for the study and we should take
advantage of it He stated the City has taken advantage of it because it
was used at the PUC hearing in Austin, and the PUC chose to deny the
recommendation and granted a larger increase than the consultants came up
with. He stated we have made our input and have been overruled and passing
it now. is just wasted effort. He stated that the only thing he can see the
City can do is to have a called meeting before June 26th approving the
lesser rate on second reading and putting the rate into an appeal situation,
otherwise on June 26th, the PUC rate w i l l go into effect.
Mrs. McCormick stated that nobody wants
to see the utilities go up and if she felt like the City could get less
she would be for it, but as long as we have the Public Utility Commission
we won't be able to get less of an increase than they have approved.
Mayor Samuels inquired if the ordinance
i s passed and i t is appealed, w i l l the City have legal fees in defending
our position?
Mr. McFarland stated it depends on if the
City desires to appeal it or they can present it to the PUC on the basis of
it being the City's choice, based on Touche -Ross recommendation or
whether the City wants to present additional evidence at the time of the
appeal. He stated that TP &L has legislative power to-pgt the rate into
effect on June 26th, the City has authority on June 27th to repeal the
rate TP &L was allowed to put into effect as a matter of statute, and replace
it with the rate the City approves. He stated he would need to research it
Mr. Ozebek stated he doesn't want to take
any action on the matter because it has been taken out of the Council's
hands, as TP &L is going to put the rate that the Public Utility Commission
approved into effect on June 26th.
After further discussion Mr. Pippin
withdrew his second to Mr. Hunt's motion.
Mr. Hunt's motion died for lack of a
second.
Mr. Pippin inquired the difference of
operation between TP &L and TESCO?
Mr. Johnson stated TP &L and TESCO have
separate gas contracts for their independant generating plants, but when
they begin to use the lignite plants and nuclear plants that are being b u i It
together, they will be able to operate together.
(Page Five,. Regular Meeting, Euless City Council, June 13, 1978)
II.
CONSIDER ORDINANCE NO. 546 AMENDING THE
CITY'S SIGN ORDINANCE
Mr. Ozebek moved to suspend the require-
ment for two separate ordinance readings and approve Ordinance No. 546 on
an emergency basis on first and final reading.
Mrs. McCormick seconded the motion and
the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Mr. Ozebek, Mrs. McCormick, Messrs. Pippin, Walker, Hunt
Nays: None
Mayor Samuels declared the motion carried.
FURTHER CONSIDERATION CF
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
Mr. Hunt moved to leave the present
ordinance requiring underground utilities as it is.
Mr. McFarland stated the present sub-
division rules and regulations state that all utilities shall be underground.
He stated he has prepared one ordinance that has the phrase " a l l u t i l i t i e s
shall be underground" deleted, at the request of the staff, and one ordinance
that deletes the underground utilities, but has added two paragraphs that
have underground utilities under certain terms.
Mr. Hunt's motion died for lack of a
second.
Mr. Ozebek moved to approve an ordinance
on first reading deleting the requirement of underground utilities from the
subdivision rules and regulations.
Mrs. McCormick seconded the motion.
Mr. Hunt stated he recognizes that the
builders will notice that the incentive for underground utilities will
continue, whether we have an ordinance or not, and a majority of the builders
will install the utilities underground. He stated his main concern is that
the ordinance has been in effect for a number of years and he would like to
see it continue in effect.
Mr. Pippin stated his opposition to
deleting the requirement is for safety. He stated on May 28th he heard a
loud explosion outside his window, and when he got outside he saw two fire
(Page Six, Regular Meeting, Euless City Council, June 73, 197.8)
trucks driving up, and he talked with a policeman that informed him that some
tree limbs had gotten into some high -line wires. He stated there was not any
damage done by this, but on that same night, some high wind caused Some high
voltage lines to get into some 110 voltage lines and caused fires in two
different houses and one house had its wiring burned out.' He stated he sees
it as an'element of safety and the cost w i l l increase because of inflation,
but it .is not that significant for the Council to ignore and because of that
he is opposed to this motion, but he would be in favor of rescinding the
requirement in "C -2" commercial and industrial developments.
The vote on Mr. Ozebek's motion is as
follows:
Ayes: Mr. Ozebek, Mrs. McCormick, and Mayor Samuels
Nays: Messrs. Pippin, and Hunt
Abstained: Mr. Walker
Mayor Samuels declared the motion caitried.
IV.
CONSIDER AUTHORIZL.TION TO ADVERTISE FOR
BIDS MR INSTALLATION CF SEWER LINE ON
OAK LANE
Mrs. McCormick moved to authorize the City
Manager to advertise for bids for installation of a sewer line on Oak Lane.
Mr. Pippin seconded the motion and the
vote is as follows:
Ayes: Mrs. McCormick, Messrs. Pippin, Walker, Hunt, and Ozebek
Nays: None
CONSIDER APPOINTMENTS TO CITY'S
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
following:
Mayor Samuels declared the motion carried.
v.
Mrs, McCormick moved to appoint the
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
Walter Elliott, Jr.
Bob Jones
Billy Owens
COUNCIL RJR SOCIAL CONCERNS
Shirley Kl lever
(Page Seven, Regular Meeting, Euless City Council, June 13, 1978)
Mr. Pippin seconded the motion and the vote
is as follows:
Ayes: Mrs. McCormick, Messrs. Pippin, Walker, Hunt, and Ozebek
Nays: None
Mayor Samuels declared the motion carried.
VI.
CONSIDER RESOLUTION NO. 434 CALLING A PUBLIC
HEARING ON ZONING CASE NO. 269 - REQUEST OF
LOREN HOWERTON FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM "PD"
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO "R -4" MULTI - FAMILY
MEDIUM DENSITY DWELLING DISTRICT AND "C -1"
NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT ON LOT 4A,
BLOCK 3, WILSHIRE VILLAGE ADDITION
Mr. Pippin moved to approve Resolution No.
434 calling a public hearing on July 11, 1978 on Zoning Case No. 269.
Mr. Walker seconded the motion and the vote
i s as follows:
Ayes: Messrs. Pippin, Walker, Ozebek, Hunt, and Mrs. McCormick
Nays: None
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
Mayor Samuels declared the motion carried.
VII,
CONTRACT /AGREEMENT WITH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Mr. McFarland stated that under a recent
Attorney General's opinion, the City is no longer allowed to continue it's
membership in the HEB Chamber of Commerce, but they can contract with the
Chamber of Commerce for their services. He stated the Chamber of Commerce
has furnished the City with a contract /agreement for services that the
Chamber has always provided and they request the City contract for these
services. Mr. McFarland stated that it is his opinion, that if it is the
pleasure of the Council, they can approve the contract by a minute order, if
the Council Wants to continue the contract for services with the Chamber of
Commerce.
Mr. Hunt moved to approve the contract/
agreement for services with the HEB Chamber of Commerce.
(Page Eight, Regular Meeting, Euless City Council, June 13, 1978) .
Mrs. McCormick seconded the motion and the
vote is as follows:
Ayes: Mr. Hunt, Mrs. McCormick, Messrs. Ozebek, Walker and Pippin
Nays: None
Mayor Samuels declared the motion carried.
AMENDMENTS TO MASSAGE PARLOR ORDINANCE
Mr. McFarl and stated he has been working
with the City staff, and correspondence from other cities, on amendments to
the City's massage parlor ordinance, and it is his opinion that the City
should approach it from the zoning aspect, which provides greater latitude
for the City. He stated that what they.are proposing is_that certain
establishments, to be allowed to operate in the City, apply for a Specific
Use Permit, and that they be limited to "C -2" and above zoning districts.
Mr. McFarland reviewed the proposed
ordinance for the Council. He stated the City can regulate the location of
these establishments under their zoning authority.
Mr. McFarland stated he would have copies
of the proposed ordinance to members of the Council and passage of the
ordinance would be on the agenda of the next council meeting.
FEDERAL LAWSUIT
Mr. McFarland stated the City has been
served with process in the federal lawsuit with the Dallas/Fort Worth Airport
and other surrounding cities with respect to Surtran for $12 million.
CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT
VIII.
NORTH MAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Mr. Dickens stated that the contractor is
on the job and has started the excavation and dirt work on the south end of
the project. He stated they have been in contact with the contractor re-
garding inadequate detour signs and barricades.
Mayor Samuels inquired why they started
where they did?
Mr. Dickens stated the contractor stated
that he had planned to start at that location, but he can't see why.
Mayor Samuels stated that he was under
the impression that there would be one or two driving lanes of traffic open,
and that has not been 01.3 case.
(Page Nine, Regular Meeting, Euless City Council, June 13, 1978)
Mr. Dickens stated it is in the contract
that there w i 11 be a lane open for traffic, but the main objective was to
keep the section they are working on passable for the people who live in
that section.
Mr. Lynch stated one problem is that Texas
Bitulithic has subcontractors for the dirt work and he has requested a meeting
with the subcontractors.
IX.
DONATION BY TRAILWOOD GARDEN CLUB
Mrs. McCormick stated she read in the Mid -
Cities Daily News that the Trailwood Garden Club donated $100.00 for land-
scaping at the Public Safety Building.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
X.
LIABILITY INSURANCE
Mr. Sustaire stated that they are in the
process of obtaining proposals for liability insurance for public officials
from two companies and he hopes to have something for the Council to review
in the near future.
BEAR CREEK PARK
Mr. Sustaire stated that the City has
obtained deeds to al 1 the property in Bear Creek Park and they have submitted
it to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department for the grant.
XI.
REMOVING SHRUBS IN MEDIAN
Mr. Pippin stated the minutes of the Park
and Recreation Board stated that some shrubs were going to have to be removed
from the median in front of the Public Safety Building and was wondering why
these were going to have to be removed?
Mr. Sustaire stated that sometime in the
future some of the median would have to be cemoved to provide egress for
north bound traffic on Ector Drive into the Public Safety Building.
Mr. Pippin inquired why this problem was
not worked out when the building was constructed.
Mr. Sustaire stated the problem was not
(Page Ten, Regular Meeting, Euless City Council, June 13, 1978)
anticipated, that only the north end of the median would be eliminated to
make the access.
Mr. Lynch stated the cost would be minimal
as it would be done with the City crew.
ADJOURNMENT
meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
ATTEST:
/s/ Del I a Houy
City Secretary
XI I.
There being no further business, the
APPROVED:
/s/ Harold D. Sarnuels
Mayor