HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-01-06 Regular Meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 6, 1976
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Planning and
Zoning Commission was called to order at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers
of Euless City Hall by Chairman Pippin. Other members present were Messrs.
Carl Tyson, Troy Fuller, Dick Wells, and Mrs. Helen Lightbody. (Absent
were Messrs. Carl Maas and Robert Johnson.)
Also present were Director of Planning
and Development, Lynn Shackelford and Recording Secretary, Becky Gunter.
VISITORS
Visitors in attendance were as follows:
David C. Hughes, W.A. Elliott, Hal C. Ferguson, Sevan Denham, Charles M.
Hunt, Glenn D. Walker, and Mrs. Willie Mae McCormick.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Councilman
Glenn Walker.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mr. Fuller made a motion to approve the
minutes of the regular meeting dated December 16, 1975, as written.
Mrs. Lightbody seconded the motion and
the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Mr. Fuller, Mrs. Lightbody, and Messrs. Wells, Pippin, and Tyson.
Nays: None
Chairman Pippin declared the motion carried.
(Page Two, Regular Meeting, Planning & Zoning Commission, January 6, 1976)
CONSIDER FINAL PLAT APPROVAL -
PHASE 1 , BEAR CREEK ESTATES.
PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF LITTLE
BEAR CREEK AND WEST OF NORTH
MAIN STREET.
Chairman Pippin recognized Mr. David
Hughes.
Mr. Hughes stated he is with the firm
Elliott & Hughes located at 1004 West Euless Blvd. and is representing Mr.
B.J. Reaves of Reaves Royal Homes requesting favorable consideration of the
final plat of Phase I , Bear Creek Estates. Mr. Hughes stated that Mr. Reaves
will be unable to attend due to a prior commitment.
Mr. Hughes stated Phase I will consist
primarily of single family housing. He further stated he has received and
reviewed the City Engineer' s letter dated December 30, 1975 and has no
objections; he is now in the process of making the necessary changes.
Chairman Pippin asked Mr. Hughes if he
intends to build a sidewalk around the culs-de-sac.
Mr. Hughes stated he does. The sidewalks
will be shown on the plat but will be constructed at the time of development
of each lot.
Mr. Tyson stated that according to item
four of Mr. Wells' motion at the December 2, 1975 Planning & Zoning Commission
meeting, a development schedule is required. Mr. Tyson asked Mr. Hughes if
he has such a schedule.
Mr. Hughes stated he does not.
Mr. Tyson asked why Phase 8 and a portion
of Phase 2 were being final platted at this time.
Mr. Elliott stated the utilities had to be
brought to those areas anyway. However, the Commercial construction will not
begin until there is a demand for it and the public will support it.
Chairman Pippin asked if the City Council
required that a development schedule be submitted with the plat.
Councilman Hunt stated the City Council
voted and approved the zoning subject to the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommendations and therefore a development schedule would be required.
Mr. Wells stated the reason he made a
development schedule a requirement in his motion was to regulate the number
of apartments in the area. If no schedule is required to allow the zoning to
revert back to the previous zoning after a specified period of time, it could
cause a potential problem.
tor
(Page Three, Regular Meeting, Planning & Zoning Commission, January 6, 1976)
Mr. Elliott apologized for not having the
development schedule. He stated it was just an oversight.
Mr. Hughes stated he was under the assump-
tion that the developer' s plat would suffice for the development schedule.
However, there are a few changes that would need to be made. It would still
be used but the time would be different depending on the economy.
Mr. Tyson stated he realized the economic
situation and therefore, he could return and request a change if needed.
Mr. Wells stated that according to the
Ordinance, the zoning does not automatically revert back but the Planning &
Zoning Commission is given the opportunity to initiate proceedings to change
the zoning.
Mr. Wells asked Mr. Shackelford if he has
ever had a Planned Development where a development schedule was required.
Mr. Shackelford stated he had not, however
he has not been in this position very long.
Mr. Wells stated he is concerned with people
requesting a change of zoning and then not developing on the property.
Mr. Wells made a motion to table the final
plat approval of Phase I , Bear Creek Estates until a development schedule is
submitted.
Mr. Tyson seconded the motion and the vote
is as follows:
Ayes: Messrs. Wells, Tyson, Fuller, Pippin, and Mrs. Lightbody.
Nays: None
Chairman Pippin declared the motion carried.
II .
REQUEST OF MR. FITZGERALD
Chairman Pippin stated that Mr. Fitzgerald
had contacted him asking if it would be feasible for him to request a change
of zoning on his property located North of Shields' Pharmacy on North Main
Street from C-1 to I-1 to allow an electrical contractor's business. Mr.
Fitzgerald had stated that the property sold but the transaction fell through,
therefore, he was considering using the property himself. Mr. Fitzgerald
further stated he will need to build some storage space behind the house.
Mr. Shackelford stated he had talked with
Mr. Fitzgerald and he also intends to store three or more forty foot construction
trailors at the sight.
Chairman Pippin stated the building will
not meet City Code and fire ratings and would be endangering the lives of the
employees working there.
(Page Four, Regular Meeting, Planning & Zoning Commission, January 6, 1976)
Mr. Shackelford stated that Mr. Fitzgerald
plans to fix the building to look decent and use it temporarily until he can
purchase other property. He further stated that only I-1 zoned property can
thlw be used for this purpose and there is none located on North Main Street. Mr.
Fitzgerald now operates his business in Arlington.
Mr. Tyson asked the type of building Mr.
Fitzgerald is using in Arlington.
Mr. Shackelford stated it is a metal
building.
Mr. Wells suggested that Mr. Fitzgerald be
recommended to purchase already Industrial zoned property.
Chairman Pippin stated he would consider
approving a change of zoning if (1) the building could be repaired to comply
with the fire code, and (2) if there was no storage required in the back.
Chairman Pippin stated a twelve foot fence
would also be needed. All Planning & Zoning Commission members agreed that
the change of zoning requested would not be feasible.
III .
REQUEST OF MR. FLOYD DEACON
Mr. Shackelford stated Mr. Floyd Deacon
had contacted him asking the proceedures for converting what was at one time
a turkey farm located at the corner of Glade Road and Cheek-Sparger Road
into mini-warehouses. The metal buildings already located on the property
would be used for the warehouses and Mr. Deacon will conform to the paving
requirements. The property, which is now zoned R-1 , has no water or sewer
services.
Chairman Pippin pointed out that without
water service, there would be no fire protection.
Mr. Fuller asked Mr. Elliott if he had any
additional information on Mr. Deacon's plans.
Mr. Elliott stated that Mr. Deacon intends
to build ten or twelve units using three buildings, each 360 feet long. He
will use temporary paving as eventually he will wipe out everything and start
over. He intends to build five or six bays 18 feet by 20 feet and, if those
are leased, he will convert the other two buildings. If they do not lease,
he will start something else.
Chairman Pippin stated it is his opinion
that Mr. Deacon will need a specific use permit rather than a non conforming
use permit.
(Page Five, Regular Meeting, Planning & Zoning Commission, January 6, 1976)
Mr. Wells asked if the property across the
street was in Grapevine.
Mr. Elliott stated the property to the
West is located in Colleyville and the property to the North is located in
Grapevine.
Mr. Wells asked if a specific use permit
has a time limit.
Chairman Pippin stated the Planning &
Zoning Commission could recommend to the City Council that a time limit be
put on the permit.
Mr. Tyson asked Mr. Elliott how much time
Mr. Deacon is asking for.
Mr. Elliott stated Mr. Deacon plans on
five years but he feels Mr. Deacon will need no longer than two years.
Mr. Elliott suggested a one year renewal .
Mr. Tyson stated Mr. Deacon will be out a
large expense for only one year if the renewal is not accepted.
Mr. Elliott stated that Mr. Deacon is
aware of this and is willing to take the chance.
Mr. Fuller stated he understands the problem
of trying to make money off the property to pay the taxes as there is no
market at this time to sell the property.
Mr. Tyson stated he thought there was a
provision for long time residents who were unable to sell their property to
reduce the amount of taxes.
Mrs. McCormick stated she knew of no such
provision.
Mr. Elliott stated there was a provision to
allow long time residents who were unable to sell their property a longer
period of time before their property would be foreclosed and sold.
Mr. Shackelford stated that a normal specific
use permit requires a survey of the property.
Chairman Pippin stated that they will not
be able to deviate from the Ordinance.
Mr. Shackelford stated there was still the
problem of the water and sewer and no fire protection.
Mrs. McCormick suggested contacting the
City Attorney, Mr. Bob McFarland, to find out if water service will be required
on the property to allow fire protection.
(Page Six, Regular Meeting, Planning & Zoning Commission, January 6, 1976)
Mr. Shackelford stated he would contact
Mr. McFarland and find out.
ibr Chairman Pippin stated they will agree
with whatever Mr. McFarland says and proceed accordingly.
IV.
HARWOOD ROAD
Mr. Tyson advised the Commission of the
proposed hazardous condition of East Harwood Road and future extension of
Fuller-Wiser Road when it becomes a major thoroughfare. He stated Hurst has
the same road condition at the corner of Pipeline and Brown Trail and there
have been a large number of accidents at that intersection. He further stated
that the property on Harwood Road has not been developed and if it is decided
that the road needs to be changed, now is the time to do so before development
begins.
Chairman Pippin stated the property is
zoned Planned Development and if the plat has already been approved, it will
need to be changed.
Mr. Shackelford stated the final plat has
not been approved.
Mr. Walker suggested making a notation in
the file on the property that the road needs to be changed.
Chairman Pippin asked Mr. Shackelford if
he would find out what exists on the property and give a report on the sit-
uation.
Mr. Shackelford stated he would do so.
V.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
APPROVED:
da7)7,41:7„,_i
Chairman