Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-08-19 % Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission August 19, 1975 CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 8:08 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Euless City Hall by Chairman Pippin. Other members present were Messrs. Troy Fuller, Dick Wells, and Carl Tyson. (Absent were Messrs. Carl Maas, Robert Johnson, and Charles Waller. ) Also present were Director of Planning and Development, Lynn Shackelford and Recording Secretary, Becky Gunter. VISITORS Visitors in attendance were as follows: Messrs. Jack Bullard, E. M. Himes, Don Wooldridge, Ronald D. Addison, Glenn Walker, Charles Hunt; and Mrs. Willie Mae McCormick. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Mr. Troy Fuller. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Fuller made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting dated August 5, 1975 with the following revisions of the seventh and eighth paragraphs of page two: "He stated the Hill-Rom Company is a subsidiary of Hillenbrand Industries which sell all over the world." "He also stated a set of plans and a brochure on the Hill-Rom Company could be made available to the Commission if so desired." Mr. Tyson seconded the motion and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Messrs. Fuller, Tyson, Wells and Pippin Nays: None Chairman Pippin declared the motion lir carried. � t (Page Two, Regular Meeting, Planning & Zoning Commission, August 19, 1975) PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING CASE NO. 247: REQUEST OF DON,WOOLDRIDGE AND ASSOCIATES FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM "R-1" SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO "C-1" NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT AND "R-2" TWO FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT ON A PORTION OF LOTS 9, 10, 11 , 22, 23, & 24, BLOCK 2, J.E. WHITNER ESTATES Chairman Pippin asked if there was anyone opposing Zoning Case No. 247 in attendance. After no opposition was made, Chairman Pippin recognized Mr. Don Wooldridge. Mr. Wooldridge stated he plans to build medium priced duplexes on the property as he feels this would be the property's best usage. Chairman Pippin asked Mr. Wooldridge what his intentions were in reference to the property he wishes zoned C-1 . Mr. Wooldridge stated he plans local shopping for that particular area. Mr. Fuller asked if the street shown on the plat would be a private or dedicated street. Mr. Wooldridge stated it would be a dedicated street. Mr. Wells asked the status of the pending lawsuit involving the property. Mr. Wooldridge stated the lawsuit should be resolved next month; that it is concerning something that happened over thirty years ago and should have been resolved at that time. He also stated that no matter what happens concerning the suit, the property in question will probably be dedicated to the City of Euless for a roadway. Chairman Pippin asked Mr. Shackelford about the width of the intended street. Mr. Shackelford stated, according to the plat, it is fifty feet which is not adequate for R-1 zoning. Mr. Wooldridge stated the extra ten feet needed for the street would have no bearing on his request for rezoning. Mr. Wooldridge stated development will begin as soon as the change of zoning is secured and the lawsuit is settled. (Page Three, Regular Meeting, Planning & Zoning Commission, August 19, 1975) Mr. Tyson asked what portion of the property would be developed first. 4,, Mr. Wooldridge stated the duplexes would be first. Mr. Wells asked if the duplexes would be built to lease or sell . Mr. Wooldridge stated they would be built to lease with an option to sell . Mr. Tyson asked what was planned for the property on the other side of the creek. Mr. Wooldridge stated that at this time no plans have been made. Mr. Wells asked Mr. Wooldridge if he planned on waiting until after the lawsuit was settled to start planning. Mr. Wooldridge stated the plans have already been started. Chairman Pippin asked if the Commission had any more questions at this time. Chairman Pippin then recognized Mr. E. M. Himes who is representing his son who owns the property East of the property in question. Mr. Rimes stated that both he and his son were in full agreement with Mr. Wooldridge concerning the zoning. Mr. Himes further stated he had talked to Mr. Lightbody, who owns the property East of his, and was told that Mr. Lightbody was also in agreement to the zoning. Mr. Fuller asked if the Euless property line is on the North or South side of Pipeline. Mr. Bullard stated it is on the North side. Mr. Fuller asked if a portion of the land was set aside for street widening. Mr. Bullard stated the land was not given due to the discrepancy in the boundaries. Mr. Wells asked if the City of Fort Worth had full control of widening and improving Pipeline. Mr. Bullard stated they did. Mr. Tyson asked Mr. Wooldridge where his commercial line was located in reference to Pipeline. (Page Four, Regular Meeting, Planning & Zoning Commission, August 19, 1975) Mr. Wooldridge stated it was located 200 feet from the neighboring set backs. Mr. Tyson asked Mr. Wooldridge if he had considered building all duplexes. Mr. Wooldridge stated he felt a blend of commercial and residential was needed. Chairman Pippin asked if there were any more questions. Mr. Wells made a motion to approve Zoning Case No. 247 Request of George Boring and Associates for change of zoning from "R-1" Single Family Dwelling District to "C-1" Neighborhood Business District and "R-2" Two Family Dwelling District on a portion of Lots 9, 10, 11 , 22, 23, & 24, Block 2, J. E. Whitner Estates. Mr. Tyson seconded the motion and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Messrs. Wells, Tyson, Fuller and Pippin Nays: None Chairman Pippin declared the motion carried. II . EXTENSION OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY REQUESTED BY H.E. BRATTON FOR THE NORTH MAIN WRECKER SERVICE Chairman Pippin recognized Mr. Ron Addison. Mr. Addison stated he was representing McClain Enterprises, formerly known as North Main Wrecker Service. He stated he is requesting an extension of a Certificate of Occupancy approved by the City Council on August 7, 1973. He also stated the only change in the Certificate of Occupancy is the name; from North Main Wrecker Service to McClain Enterprises. Chairman Pippin stated the fence is in bad need of repair and is an eyesore to the public. Mr. Tyson asked Mr. Bullard what the fence requirements were. Mr. Bullard stated the screening fence must be at least six feet high, have a permanent mounting, and have no opening over 40 inches per 144 square inches. (Page Five, Regular Meeting, Planning & Zoning Commission, August 19, 1975) Mr. Fuller moved to recommend approval for the extension of the Certificate of Occupancy for two years as requested by Mr. Bratton with the exception of bringing the fence up to City requirements. Mr. Tyson stated he would second the motion with an amendment that Mr. Bratton bring the fence up to good state of repair. Mr. Fuller stated that the fence repair was included in his motion. Mr. Wells stated he would like to amend the motion and issue the Certificate of Occupancy for only one year in order to keep the fence in good condition. Mr. Shackelford stated the fence must be inspected by the City before the Certificate of Occupancy can be issued. Chairman Pippin stated an annual renewal of the Certificate of Occupancy would insure maintenance of the fence. Mr. Fuller inquired if Mr. Addison had any comment on the time limit of the Certificate of Occupancy. Mr. Addison stated he feels a two year minimum would not be unreasonable if the fence is repaired before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. Chairman Pippin stated that not long after the original Certificate of Occupancy was issued the fence had deteriorated to its present condition. Mr. Addison stated if the fence was brought up to City standards before the Certificate of Occupancy is issued and then later falls below City standards, the Certificate of Occupancy could be revoked. Mr. Shackelford stated it would be the responsibility of the Inspection Department to be sure the fence was kept up to City standards. After a lengthy discussion, Chairman Pippin stated the motion for the extension of the Certificate of Occupancy as requested by Mr. Bretton includes the stipulations granted two years ago, as follows: 1 . 6 foot screening fence 2. no dismantling of cars or sale of parts 3. cars can remain on property for a maximum of 120 days The vote on Mr. Fullers motion is as follows: Ayes: Messrs. Fuller, Tyson, Wells and Pippin Nays: None Chairman Pippin declared the motion carried. (Page Six, Regular Meeting, Planning & Zoning Commission, August 19, 1975) Chairman Pippin stated the Certificate of Occupancy can not be issued until the extension is approved by the City Council and the fence is brought up to City standards. III . COG PLANNING MEETING Mr. Shackelford stated the meeting that was to be held August 11th and 12th, 1975 was called off until a later date. He stated that after talking to Mr. Bob Wagoner the meeting had been tentatively set for Saturday, September 27, 1975, and Saturday, October 4, 1975. Mr. Shackelford asked if the three representatives should be chosen at this time. Chairman Pippin stated that since there would be two more meetings before the COG Planning Meeting, the representatives could be chosen at a later date when the Commission would know better who could attend. IV. AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS Mr. Shackelford stated the American Institute of Planners meeting would be held in San Antonio this year. He stated the exact date is not known but he believes it is the week of October 6, 1975. Mr. Shackelford stated he has a brochure from the American Institute of Planners which he will bring to the next meeting. V. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m. APPROVED: / Chairman / I