HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-02-04 Regular Meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission
February 4, 1975
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Planning and
Zoning Commission was called to order at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers
of Euless City Hall by Chairman Bob Pippin. Other members present were
Messrs. Troy Fuller, Carl Tyson, Don Perkins, and Robert Johnson. (Absent
were Carl Maas and Mrs. Jackie Comola).
Also present were Assistant to the City
Manager, Kenneth Taylor, and Recording Secretary, Bonnie O'Brien.
VISITORS
Visitors in attendance were as follows :
Messrs. Dale Gresham, W. L. Kirkley, Robert Webster, Eugene Harrigan, Glen
Holmbeck, G. W. Winter, Jr. , Sevan Denham, Bill Carmichael , Donald White,
J. R. Payne, and Mesdms. Willie Mae McCormick, Mary Holmbeck, and Nell
Longfellow.
INVOCATION
The invocation was presented by Mr. Bob
Johnson.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Chairman Pippin moved to approve the minutes
of the regular meeting dated January 21 , 1975, as written, with the correction
that the invocation was presented by Mr. Carl Tyson.
Mr. Tyson seconded the motion and the vote
was as follows:
Ayes: Messrs. Pippin, Tyson, Perkins, Fuller, and Johnson
Nays : None
Chairman Pippin declared the motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING: ZONING CASE
NO. 244 REQUEST OF DR. RICHARD
J. THOMES FOR CHANGE OF ZONING
FROM "R-1" SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
DISTRICT TO "PD" PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT ON LOT 9, 10, 11 , AND PART OF
(Page Two, Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission, February 4, 1975)
LOT 12, RAY SHELTON SUB-
DIVISION, AND TRACT 4A, B. F.
CROWLEY SURVEY. (PROPERTY
LOCATED NORTH, EAST, AND SOUTH
OF ELEVATED WATER TANK) .
Chairman Pippin stated that the public
hearing for Zoning Case No. 244 would not be held because there were some
property owners within 200 feet of property who were not notified of the
case and the hearing date.
He stated that the new hearing date for
Zoning Case No. 244, request of Dr. Richard Thomes, would be set for
March 4, 1975, and that all property owners within 200 feet would be
notified.
II
CONSIDER PLAT APPROVAL:
MORRISDALE SQUARE, REQUEST OF
C. G. DUNN, 1307 CLIFFWOOD DR.
EULESS , TEXAS. (PROPERTY LOCATED
EAST OF ARWINE CEMETERY AND SOUTH
OF MORRISDALE SHOPPING CENTER
Chairman Pippin recognized Mr. Bill
Carmichael who stated that he was making this presentation for plat approval
of Morrisdale Square in behalf of Mr. Jerry Dunn.
Mr. Carmichael stated that this development
is proposed for professional people, doctors, dentists, attorneys, engineers,
etc. The plan is to develop four units in the area with a central parking
lot for employees in the panhandle configuration of the property with a zone
between with trees left where possible. On that part of the property that
slopes to the South, all trees and natural scenes will be left as is because
it is unsuitable for building.
He stated that Mr. Dunn has been conducting
a study regarding the type of architecture and building materials of the
surrounding buildings in order that the new construction will be compatible
in appearance and structure with the existing buildings.
Mr. Carmichael stated that the several sections
of the building will have separate parking in addition to a central parking
area.
(Page Three, Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission, February 4, 1975)
Mr. Johnson ask if the parking for the
employees would be initially constructed along with the other phases of the
project or will it be phased in as the buildings are occupied.
Mr. Carmichael stated he was not sure of this.
He stated that if they sold or leased to
professional people they would go ahead with building of parking spaces and
that maintenance of four lots will be shared by all property owners.
He stated that if a building was rented to
tenants who did not require parking, they would not be obligated to maintain
an area which would be shared by all property owners.
Mr. Johnson stated that not knowing the amount
of parking spaces required, he thought Mr. Dunn would have to go ahead and pave
it.
The Commission stated that it felt there was
a City Ordinance that required the initial parking areas be complete.
The question was asked which tract the central
parking lot would be tied to, if any.
Mr. Carmichael replied that it will be tract
four which he will occupy himself and that this will be written into the
occupancy contracts.
Mr. Carmichael asked if a six foot fence would
be required.
The Commission replied that there is a City
Ordinance requiring a six foot fence between commercial property and residential
property.
The Commission stated that it is possible that
this requirement could be set aside by mutual agreement of all involved: the
City; property owners; and project developers.
Mr. Johnson stated that he thought fencing of
some kind should be there and of a kind that would lend itself to the surrounding
landscape.
Chairman Pippin stated that according to the
City Engineers letter regarding this plat, the concrete valley should appear
on the plat along with a provision for it's maintenance, and drainage runoff
details. Also, the plat should show that Arwine Road is developed in accordance
with Hurst street standards.
(Page Four, Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission, February 4, 1975)
r He stated that before a recommendation be
given for this plat approval , two questions should be answered: (1 ) clarifi-
cation of property lines, whether city limit lines are in Euless or Hurst;
(2) Need shown on map where drainage area is on ditch and means proposed
providing that drainage.
Mr. Carmichael ask if the Commission would
write a letter stating these two requests so he could forward it to Mr. Dunn.
Chairman Pippin stated such a letter would be
written.
Mr. Fuller made a motion to table this
application for plat approval until February 18, 1975.
Mr. Perkins seconded the motion and the vote
was as follows:
Ayes: Mr. Fuller, Perkins, Johnson, Tyson, and Pippin
Nays: None
Chairman Pippin declared the motion carried.
III
CONSIDER PLAT APPROVAL:
AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK, REQUEST
OF W. S . DUBOSE CORPORATION,
FORT WORTH, TEXAS. (PROPERTY
LOCATED SOUTH OF 183 AND NORTH
OF PIPELINE ROAD WEST OF EULESS
INDUSTRIAL PARK) .
Chairman Pippin recognized Mr. Gordon Swift.
Mr. Swift stated he was making this presentation
for plat approval of Airport Business Park for Mr. W. S. Dubose; that he had in
hand the City Engineers letter and that plans had been revised to reflect most
of the items in the Engineers letter.
He stated that regarding Item 7, pertaining to
HurricaneIC reeds, that it was their understanding that a perpetual maintenance
agreement would be signed at the time of the development of that section; that
this was not platted intentionally at this time.
In the course of this presentation a question
arose concerning curb lines along Highway 183.
LIP
(Page Five, Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission, February 4, 1975)
Mr. Swift stated that Mr. Bullard had required
the Dubose Corporation to install pavement fifty eight (58) from median to the
curb line on Highway 183. Mr. Swift stated that in his opinion this was not in
conformance with State standards which require only thirty six (36) feet, and
that the extra pavement would become a maintenance liability for the City.
He stated he would be willing to conform with
Mr. Bullard's requirement but he would rather recommend thirty six (36) feet of
pavement. He would, however, tie into the existing curb east of his property
which is fifty eight (58) feet, and then by means of a gradual radius bring the
curb in to thirty six (36) feet.
After some discussion among the Planning and
Zoning members it was agreed that thirty six (36) feet of pavement was preferable
to fifty eight (58) feet.
It was the consensus of the Commission that
Item 8 of the Engineers letter rendered approval of the plat subject to the
curb line question being worked out to the satisfaction of the City and the
State.
A lengthy discussion was held concerning the
City requirements of sidewalks being installed on both sides of the street
within the project.
Mr. Swift and Mr. Dubose contented that side-
walks in an industrial project of this nature were not necessary and would
result in a liability to the City in that most of the sidewalks would be torn
up or patched up in the course of construction. It was also their contention
that the need for sidewalks in an industrial park did not exist since adequate
off-street parking for employees, etc. , would be provided.
The Planning and Zoning Commission, after some
discussion, agreed that the sidewalks within the project were not necessary but
should be installed along Highway 183.
Mr. Johnson made the request that Mr. Bullard
meet with the State Highway Department and report to the Planning and Zoning
Commission what standard requirements of street widths will be.
Mr. Fuller made the motion to recommend approval
of the plat plans as presented to the Commission subject to Engineers letter, with
exception of Items 5 and 8: Item 5, that sidewalks be required on Highway 183
only, and Item 8, that the amount of distance between curb and gutter be worked
out between the State Highway Department and the City of Euless.
Mr. Perkins seconded the motion and the vote
was as follows :
Ayes: Messrs. Fuller, Perkins, Pippin, Johnson, and Tyson
low Nays : None
Chairman Pippin declared the motion carried.
1
(Page Six, Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission, February 4, 1975)
IV
CONSIDER MEETING WITH PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION OF BEDFORD
Chairman Pippin stated that the Planning and
Zoning Commission would like to meet with the Bedford Planning and Zoning
Commission on February 27, 1975, in their regularly scheduled workshop session.
A request was made for a letter to be written
to the Bedford Planning and Zoning Commission asking if this date would be
acceptable and for a letter of confirmation of place and time of meeting.
V
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
OF PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION MEMBERS
Mr. Perkins observed that, because the footage
between residential property and the proposed project of Zoning Case No. 244
were not double-checked, the hearing for this project had to be postponed with
practically no notice to interested persons, and that as a result, a large
group of people appeared for the hearing only to be informed that the hearing
would be held at a later date. He further remarked that, judging from the
discussions among these persons in the hall after they had left the room, there
was a high degree of discontent among them concerning the postponement. Mr.
Perkins suggested that, in the future, footages be double-checked.
Chairman Pippin stated that the City tried
to contact the people concerned, to notify them of the postponement, but were
unable to reach all of them.
Chairman Pippin stated that he would like to
go on record as having inquired if the Planning and Zoning Commission agenda
might be mailed out a little earlier to the members.
VI
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 10:10 p.m.
APPROVED:
&i '
d1/ 1
L