Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-03-19 tor Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission March 19, 1974 CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 8:05 P. M. in the Council Chambers of Euless City Hall by Chairman Carl Tyson. Other members present were Messrs. Ray Ozebek, Don Perkins, Herman Wallace, Richard Leggett, Robert Johnson and Bob Pippin. Also present were City Inspector Jack Bullard and Recording Secretary Della Houy. VISITORS Visitors in attendance were Messrs. Walter Adams, Weldon Walker, Jimmy Stone, J. H. Ridlehuber, Joe Ridlehuber, M. J. Barber, Wayne Harp, William Dunn, Bobby Nichols, Robert Spinks, A. G. Rampy, Floyd Cavalliero, Dalton Chesney, Chester South, Billy Smith, Billy Hilborn, C. M. Tomlinson, James Trapp, Weston Cox, Bill Trussell , Doug Ritter, John Soliday, R. C. Messick, Ira Goodfellow, Charles Stubbs, Jack Yarnell , C. D. Nichols, Kenneth Davis, Frank Farrison, Ray McCord and Frank Douglass; Mesdms. Barbara Ridlehuber, Mary Ridlehuber, Peggy Barber, Helen Crawford, Carmen Garza, Teresa Harp, Jo Ellen Spinks, Virginia Green, Nada White, Sarah Godwin, Margaret Rampy, Jonnie Cavalliero, LaNeil Chesney, Chester Smith, Billy Hilborn, C. M. Tomlinson, James Trapp, Weston Cox, Bill Trussell , J. M. Baggett, J. H. Soliday, Mary Pope, R. C. Messick, Charles Stubbs, Kenneth McCorkle, Leroy Bryant, Marilyn Davis, Freida Farison, Nelda McCord, Elsie Hale, and Willie Mae McCormick. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Wallace moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting dated March 5, 1974 as written. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Messrs. Wallace, Johnson, Perkins, Ozebek, Leggett, Pippin and Tyson Nays: None Chairman Tyson declared the motion carried. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL - LOT 1 , WAFFLE HOUSE ADDITION (PROPERTY LOCATED NORTHWEST CORNER BYERS DRIVE AND HUFFMAN ROAD) REQUEST OF WAFFLE. HOUSE CORPORATION - MR. JIMMY STONE REPRESENTATIVE. Chairman Tyson recognized Mr. Jimmy (Page Two, Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission, March 19, 1974) Stone, who stated that he is presenting the final plat for Lot 1 , Waffle House Addition. Mr. Stone presented pictures of the proposed restaurant and menus. Mr. Stone stated that the final plat has been revised accord- ing to recommendations by the City Engineers. Chairman Tyson read a letter from Mr. Bill Ratliff, City' s Consulting Engineer, dated March 12, 1974, as follows: "We have received the final plans for Waffle House No. 1 and submit to you our comments as follows: All of the items discussed in our previous letter have been satisfied, and we have one other comment. On the typical street section subgrade stabilization is not indicated underneath the curb and gutter section. Present City Policy is to require such stabilization to be carried 6 inches back of the curb prior to construction of that curb. Subject to revision of the typical section, we would recommend your approval of this project." Mr. Stone stated his company would comply with the recommendation of the Engineer. Mr. Ozebek moved to recommend approval to the final plat of Lot 1 , Waffle House Addition, subject to City Engineer's letter dated March 12, 1974. Mr. Perkins seconded the motion and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Messrs. Ozebek, Perkins, Wallace, Johnson, Leggett, Pippin and Tyson Nays: None Chairman Tyson declared the motion carried. I1 . PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING CASE NO. 238 - REQUEST OF H. K. HUIE, JR. FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM "R-1" SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO "C-2" COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT, "R-3" MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT AND "R-2" TWO FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF HUNTINGTON ADDITION AND WEST OF EULESS CITY LIMIT LINE. Chairman Tyson opened the Public Hearing on Zoning Case No. 238, for change of zoning from "R-l" Single Family (Page Three, Regular- Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission, March 19, 1974) „. Dwelling District to "C-2” Community Business District on Tracts 1 , 2, and 5; "R-3" Multi-Family Dwelling District on Tract 3; and "R-2" Two Family Dwelling District on Tract 4, and recognized Mr. H. K. Huie, Jr. Mr. Huie stated that he is the owner of the property and he bought the property subject to rezoning when the property was in the City of Fort Worth, and the property was rezoned as he is requesting it now. He further stated that when Euless annexed the property from Fort Worth the zoning reverted back to "R-I" Single Family Dwelling District, and he did not receive notice of the annexation and was therefore unaware of the zoning change to residential . In reply to a question from Mr. Perkins, Mr. Huie stated that he has no definite plans which type of commercial usage will be there. In reply to a question from Mr. Ozebek, Mr. Huie stated that Alexander Lane would be the only street into the development from the west, that the other entrances would be from SH 183 and proposed American Airlines Boulevard. Mr. Ozebek inquired if the City' s Master Plan included any streets into this portion of Euless. Mr. Bullard stated that the Master Plan only designates thoroughfare and collector streets, that streets in developments are required in the final platting. Mr. Bullard further stated that the Fire Marshal would require entrances from the west for fire protection. Mr. Pippin inquired why Mr. Huie was requesting this type zoning instead of Planned Development. Mr. Huie stated he has three (3) reasons, opposition from the property owners, his legal counsel and it would be difficult to design a planned development community on land this size. In reply to a question from Mr. Ozebek, Mr. Huie stated that he would first develop the duplexes, install streets, and the tract west of Huntington Drive is suitable for small commercial usage. Mr. Tyson inquired if there were other proponents present. There being none, he inquired if there were opponents present who wished to speak. Mr, Robert Spinks, 301 Huntington, inquired what type of apartment houses he would build, that Mr. Huie has thlw two (2) small rent houses on this property and why tear them down, why not build more residential houses. Mr. Frank Douglass, 502 Martin Lane, inquired why streets would be cut into this development from Euless, (Page Four, Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission, March 19, 1974) tor Mr. Bullard stated that when the land is platted the Fire Marshall would require access from Euless, that the lower section would have access from East Huitt and SH183 would be the quickest way into the north section. He stated that the Fire Marshal likes to have several entrances for fire protection. Mr. Douglass inquired why Mr. Huie wants to divide this development into this type zoning. Mr. Huie stated that the most valuable property is along SH183 and American Airlines Boulevard, and the apartments and duplexes would serve as a buffer for the property owners in Huntington Addition. Mr. Huie further stated that the two (2) rent houses not on this property would be moved. In reply to a question from Mr. Ozebek, Mr. Huie stated that the value of the land at the time of purchase was too expensive for residential building. In reply to a question from Mr. Douglass, Mr. Huie stated that he is a builder and developer and he intends to develop this land. Mr. Charles Stubbs, 808 Koen Lane, inquired any reason duplexes had to be built, why not leave it residential . Mr. J. H. Ridlehuber, 208 Huntington, stated that when Mr. Huie withdrew his previous request he would have a Planned Development layout of what he planned to build, and his request at this time is almost the same as the previous request. In reply to a question from a gentle- man in the audience, Mr. Huie stated that the request for "R-2" zoning is not the same as commercial zoning and the duplex zoning is for 1 .7 acres, approximately six (6) lots. Mr. R. W. Harris, 805 Koen Lane, stated that Mr. Huie is looking for the profit of the dollar and the people are looking out for their living area. Mr. Charles Stubbs stated that the duplexes would not be adding to the property value, just detracting from it, and why not continue with residential zoning in this area. Mr. Gene Rampy, 707 Koen Lane, inquired the value of the apartments and duplexes, if they were to be luxury apartments. Mr. Huie stated that the value of the land has increased since he purchased it, and the duplexes would be approximately $30,000.00 and the apartments would be a superior product. He further stated that he has several apartment complexes in Dallas, and they would not detract from the neighborhood but would improve it. (Page Five, Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission, March 19, 1974) (Ilmw Mr. Ray McCord, 308 Huntington, stated that if Mr. Huie sells his commercial zoned property, any type of business can be put in there, and that he believes Mr. Huie' s zoning request has not changed since his last appearance before the Commission. Mr. Huie stated that the land located in Fort Worth city limits is zoned commercial and he does not know the exact value of the land but it is extremely valuable and there wouldn't be just any type of commercial building put on this type of land. In reply to a question from Mr. Perkins, Mr. Huie stated that the duplexes will serve as a buffer and the apart- ments are the closest thing to residential and the apartments will serve as a buffer between the residential development and the commercial development. Mr. C. M. Tomlinson, 828 Atkerson, inquired if the apartments and duplexes were to be F.H.A. Mr. Huie stated that he has never built F.H.A. type apartments and he will not build them here; that these will be family type apartments. Mrs. Ray McCord, 308 Huntington, stated that at the previous hearing Mr. Huie promised something definite in his plans, but these plans seem the same. Mr. Pippin stated that the last time Mr. Huie presented his plans he stated he would request a Planned Develop- ment. Mr. Huie stated that if he gave inten- tions of a Planned Development he was misunderstood. Mr. Floyd Cavalliero, 806 Atkerson, inquired if Mr. Huie was prepared to take the City to court if this request was rejected. Mr. Huie stated that after this hear- ing he would go to the City Council and if denied by the Council , he would take the advise of his lawyer. Mr. D. B. Underwood, 406 Huntington, stated they are having trouble with the airport noise now and in five (5) years when this development is complete, they will have more problems. Mr. Tomlinson inquired if a fence is required in duplex zoning. � Mr. Huie stated that the ordinance screening wall between residential zoning and multi-family zoning. Mr. Bullard stated that a six (6) foot (Page Six, Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission, March 19, 1974) screening fence is required between duplex zoning and commercial zoning but not between residential zoning and duplex zoning,. that a fence would run with the property line north and south past each building. In reply to a question from Mr. Tyson, Mr. Bullard stated that if Martin Lane and Huitt were not dedicated streets then the screening fence could extend the complete distance of the development. Mr. Ken David, 313 Huntington, stated that a six (6) foot fence would not hide an apartment house. Mr. Weston Cox, 501 Huntington, stated they objected to opening their doors to multi-family type housing, and Mr. Huie has not presented anything specific and he is asking for "R-3" zoning and that is what they object to. Mr. Douglass stated that when the trade with the City of Fort Worth took place, the City promised the people in the Huntington Addition they would protect them and their property; that they cannot protect them from Fort Worth, and he would like for Mr. Huie to leave a lot or two for residential and then build his apartments and duplexes. Mr. Stubbs stated that duplexes would tend to increase taxes and he agrees with Mr. Douglass. Mr. Gene Rampy stated that when Mr. Huie left the October, 1973 meeting, he stated he would come back with a Planned Development, that when the registered letters were received they knew something was going to happen. He stated that if Mr. Huie had presented a Planned Development, the home owners would have been willing to give in but Mr. Huie did not come back with a Planned Development. Mr. J. H. Ridlehuber stated that the apartment complex would turn the streets into a freeway and this would not be safe for the children. Mr. Tyson inquired if Mr. Huie had any objections to buffer on his property by building residential houses along the west side of the property and then continuing with the multi- family building. Mr. Huie stated that if he were to build houses and streets to serve these houses, this would require a lot more land and would make the homes too expensive. Mr. Tyson stated that a buffer would probably take up most of the land in the Euless City Limits, but he would like to see residential between the duplexes and the apartments to protect the present home owners. Mr. Huie stated that he has no plans to sell any of the land at this time and it is unrealistic to develop this property into single family dwellings. (Page Seven, Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission, March 19, 1974) tir Mr. Johnson inquired if possible there could be a green belt to buffer between the residential area and the proposed multi-family. Mr. Huie stated that he would not put the front doors of the apartments facing the back yards of the present homes; that there would be parking and driveways in that location and he is desirous of protection for the present home owners. Mr. Johnson stated that some apartments are very nice and some are not, and if Mr. Huie could come back with some pictures for the residents to see and know what they will be looking at, then would be the time to make a decision. Mr. Huie stated he would agree with the suggestion of Mr. Johnson if the Commission would take his request under advisement and he will submit more plans. Mr. Tomlinson stated he is not concerned what Mr. Huie will build but he is concerned if Mr. Huie sells the property what the other owner will build. Mr. Huie stated he would consider a Planned Development on Tract 3, on which he is requesting multi-family at this time, if it is the desire of the Commission. A gentleman from the audience inquired if this were to become rent property, transient people would be living there, and he was wondering if patio homes or townhouses wouldn' t be more feasible than apartments. Mrs. Mary Ann Ridlehuber stated that they had lived in an apartment for four (4) years and have purchased a home to get out of apartments and she does not want to see an apartment complex in her back yard. In reply to a question, Mr. Bullard stated that all property in Euless fronting SH183 for a distance of 300 feet is zoned commercial , from the old city limit line between Euless and Fort Worth west to the west city limits. Mr. John Soliday stated that he lives on the southeast corner of Huntington Drive and Alexander and he would not like to live across the street from a garage or restaurant and when this type buildings go in, other commercial "joints" will be built there. Mr. Walter Adams, 200 Huntington, stated that the present apartments and commercial on Dickey are close enough and the large sign erected on SH183 are too close and he is opposed to this zoning request. Mr. Johnson inquired if Mr. Huie would consider combining Tract 2 and Tract 3 into a Planned Development. (Page Eight, Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission, March 19, 1974) Mr. Huie stated he would only consider Planned Development on Tract 3 as a compromise. Mr. Ray McCord inquired about closing off the streets that would enter into the development from the west. Mr. Huie stated that he could not be denied access into the City of Euless. Mrs, Helen Crawford stated that if something is passed, trucks will go in and tear up the streets. A gentleman from the audience stated that he lives in the end house on Koen Lane and when you have duplexes you never know what is going to move into them. Mr. Tyson inquired concerning omitting Tract 3 from the request and Mr. Huie return with a Planned Development on this tract and considering the remainder of the request. In reply to a question from Mr. Johnson Mr. Bullard stated that the Commission can consider a reduced request but they cannot consider an increased request. Mr. Huie stated he would withdraw Tract 3 from this zoning request and return with a request for a Planned Development. In reply to a question from Mr. McCord, Mr. Tyson explained that if the public hearing is left open, the residents will not receive another registered letter. Mr. McCord requested that the Commission allow the homeowners vote on the complete rezoning by a show of hands. Mr. Bullard explained the Vernon Statute Law in the State of Texas on the voting of the members of the Commission. Mr. Tyson inquired if there were other opponents. There being none, he declared the Public Hearing closed. Mr. Perkins moved to table the rezoning request to allow Mr. Huie to return with a complete package of Planned Development and not divide the request. The motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Johnson moved to recommend dis- approval of Zoning Case No. 238 for change of zoning from "R-1" Single Family Dwelling District to "C-2" Community Business District on Tracts 1 , 2 and 5; "R-3" Multi-Family Dwelling District on Tract 3 and "R-2" Two Family Dwelling District on Tract 4. (Page Nine, Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission, March 19, 1974) ihr Mr. Wallace seconded the motion and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Messrs. Johnson, Wallace, Ozebek, Perkins, Pippin, Leggett, and Tyson Nays: None Chairman Tyson declared the motion carried. Mr. Huie stated that he would not come back with a Planned Development but would present it before the City Council and if denied will go to court. III . PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING CASE NO. 239 - REQUEST OF JOHNSON-CAMPBELL LUMBER COMPANY FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM "R-l" SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO "PD" PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR MINI-WAREHOUSES ON A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF SPUR 350, NORTH OF CONTINENTAL VILLA APARTMENTS, AND WEST OF PARK CRESTMOOR HOUSING ADDITION. Chairman Tyson opened the Public Hearing on Zoning Case No. 239, request of change of zoning from "R-1" Single Family Dwelling District to "PD" Planned Development and recognized Mr. Dwayne Wilcox. Mr. Wilcox stated that he represents Johnson-Campbell Lumber Company and he would like to correct a misconception that his client is not in the mini-warehouse business; that this will be a hybrid warehouse area. Mr. Wilcox stated that the walls will be six (6) foot high of concrete construction, permanent type screening wall along the east side of the property to protect the home owners. He stated the screening wall would require no maintenance. The square foot- age of the individual buildings would be approximately 6,000 square feet, serving commerical type business that require more storage area than they have at their place of business. He stated the ingress and egress would be from Spur 350 and from Villa Drive into FM157. He stated that the fire lanes would be into Windward Way and Park Drive. He further stated that Johnson-Campbell Lumber Company has owned this property for several years, developed the Sheppard Addition and would begin construction of this project as soon as they received a plat approval and a building permit could be issued. Mr. Wilcox stated that they would not solicit individual clients as this development would not be for the storage of boats and garage storage. Mr. Ozebek inquired if there were plans for any offices. Mr. Wilcox stated that possibly some office space would be constructed on the front of the buildings, if the clients requested them, but there would be none for rent. (Page Ten, Regular Meeting Planning_ and Zoning Commission, March 19, 1974) taw In reply to a question, Mr. Wilcox stated that the business leasing these storage areas would probably use them the same as their store hours and there would be no night time storage problems. He stated they would work with the City to keep traffic out of the residential area, by designating the openings from Windward Way and Park Drive as fire lanes and erect signs to that effect. Mr. Johnson stated that according to the plat, there would not be enough parking spaces for customers and occupants if the warehouses were used for a supply operation. Mr. Wilcox stated he has discussed this with Mr. Bullard and this will be no problem. Mr. Bullard stated that Mr. Wilcox will be required to correct the plans before going before the City Council . In reply to a question by Mr. Johnson, Mr. Wilcox stated that there would be no problem on the height of the fence. Mr. Bullard stated that the Commission could state the height of fence required. In reply to a question from Mr. Johnson, Mr. Wilcox stated that there would not be a time limit on the hours at the warehouse too. Mr. Leggett inquired if there would be a lease agreement and Mr. Wilcox stated they would have a control lease agreement. Mr. Perkins inquired if there would be surveillance other than the Police Department. Mr. Wilcox stated if lessee wanted something other than police surveillance, it can be done at a later date. Mr. Pippin inquired concerning security lighting and Mr. Wilcox stated if the engineers suggest additional light- ing this can be done. Mr. Wallace inquired if there would be a limit to the items to be stored there and Mr. Wilcox stated that anytime a person enters into a lease agreement, he would not jeopardize his insurance, the home owners or his own merchandise. Mr. Johnson inquired if the construction will be the same type as in the drawings , and Mr. Wilcox stated basically yes, that Johnson-Campbell have been in contact with a contractor. A discussion followed on the required parking spaces and Mr. Wilcox stated he could meet with Mr. Swift, land planner, and take the extra parking spaces into account. (Page Eleven, Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission, March 19, 1974) Mr. Wilcox suggested the Commission continue the Public Hearing, take under advisement and he will come back with a revised plat for the extra parking spaces. In answer to a question from Mr. Perkins, Mr. Wilcox stated that the development was not designed for large trailer trucks, as they did not want large vehicles in that area. Mr. Tyson inquired the reason this area was considered for warehouses since the Master Plan provides for warehouses in industrial zoning. Mr. Wilcox stated that Johnson-Campbell Lumber Company has owned this land for some time; that the area west of this property is zoned commercial and to the east is residential and they believe this zoning would be better than apartments. He further stated they attempted to construct something that would clean up the area, and be attractive looking. Mr. Tyson inquired if there were any proponents. There being none, he called for opponents. Mr. Tyson read a letter dated March 18, 1974, as follows: "We the undersigned, residents of Euless, Texas, protest the zoning to "PD" Planned Development for Mini-Warehouses on the following property: 11 .728 acre tract in the A. J. Huitt Survey, A-684. Property located South of Huffman Drive, west of South Sheppard Drive. We petition to keep it zoned "R-1" Single Family Dwelling District as presently zoned for the following reasons: 1 . Devaluation of property 2. Increased possibilities of vandalism 3. Increased truck traffic on residential street in an area where there are between 40 and 50 small children 4. Increased noise pollution" This petition contains twenty (20) names of residents of Park Crestmoor Addition. Mr. Jack Yarnell , 207 Windward Way, stated that the residents are getting good use out of the land as it now is with the tank for fishing and the large area is a good place for the children to play, and he would like to see it become a park. Mr. Tyson stated that the Park and Recreation Committee is planning on a park in that area and Mr. Yarnell might want to telephone City Hall and attend these meetings. Mrs. Trussell , 205 Windward Way, inquired if there were some way to prevent people in the development from using the residential streets. (Page Twelve, Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission, March 19, 1974) L Mr. Bullard stated a usable way would be to put a gate at the entrance from the fire lanes with a lock and the fire department keep the key, as the Fire Chief would require fire lane access. Mr. Wilcox stated that on final plat approval he would get approval of the Fire Marshal and City Engineer. Mr. Dale Pannell , 209 Sheppard, stated that he is in the building business and he would rather see some type of industry that would employ people instead of just a warehouse development. Mr. E. L. White, 101 Sheppard inquired with such a large floor area, what would prevent people from putting in a boat shop if the City didn't have any authority. Mr. Wilcox stated that his client would be willing to enter into a covenant with the City and this would allow the City officials to enforce the terms of the covenant. Mr. W. G. Crabtree, 114 Sheppard stated if plumbing and other types of supplies are stored there, semi-trailers would have to come into the development to deliver supplies and he would rather see some type of business there that would employ people. Mr. Ken McCorkle, 108 Sheppard stated that he has invested in his home and has lived there thirteen (13) years and has four (4) children, and the neighborhood is a nice place to live and raise children and he would hate to see it go into warehouses. Chairman Tyson inquired if there were others who wished to speak in opposition to this zoning request. There being none, he declared the public hearing closed. Mr. Wilcox stated he would like to withdraw his application of this zoning request, make adjustments and appear before the Commission for another hearing. IV. SEMINAR ON URBAN GROWTH Mr. Tyson stated that he would attend the Seminar on Urban Growth to be held in Austin, Texas on May 6 and 7, 1974. V. LAND USE MAP • Mr. Johnson moved that the Planning and Zoning revised Land Use Map be on the agenda for the next Council meeting and the Park and Recreation Land Use proposal submitted at a later date and the City Secretary notify the Commission members when this will be on the agenda. (Page Thirteen, Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission, March 19, 1974) Mr. Pippin seconded the motion and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Messrs. Johnson, Pippin, Leggett, Wallace, Perkins, Ozebek, and Tyson Nays: None Chairman Tyson declared the motion carried. VI . CITIZEN' S COMMENT Mr. Frank Douglass complimented the members of the Commission on the commendable job they were doing and the citizens of Euless appreciate it. VII . ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 11 :20 P. M. APPROVED: LIA Chairman— L