HomeMy WebLinkAboutPreliminary (Binder Notes) Capital Improvements Program FY12-13tt
IVY'S
Although tonight is planned primarily as a discussion of the Capi
Improvements Plan, we will start with a brief overview of the current year's
financial position and our expectations for FY2013 so that as you consider the
projects you will have a general overview of where we are overall.
•
We receive preliminary property values from Tarrant Appraisal District in
May and in June and then receive the certified values on July 25th. As you can
see from this chart, the certified July values typically are less than the May
estimates. This reduction has historically ranged from 2% to 5%. The June
valuations are significantly less as the Appraisal District works through
protest and incomplete valuations. For FY2013, we have assumed a decline of
4% from the May valuation in our current budget estimates. This would
result in taxable value of approximately $2.69B.
•
As you have previously mentioned, values declined during FY10 and FY11
resulting in a combined loss of 8.1%. In FY12, values increased 5.9% and
based on the May estimates with a 4% reduction, values would increase by an
additional 1.1% in FY2013.
•
As a reminder, the tax rate has remained the same since FY08 and has actually
been held or reduced every year since 1995.
•
As we described last year, State Law requires cities to calculate an effective
tax rate each year that theoretically represents the rate necessary to generate
the same revenue from year to year. By holding the tax rate flat for FY2010
and FY2011, the City forfeited approximately $1.8M in revenue rather than
adopting the effective tax rate.
With the increase in values in FY2012, the City was required to publish a
notice indicating that we were raising taxes since the calculation only looks at
the immediate preceding year. However, as you can see, we have only
recovered about $477K of the $1.8M previously forfeited. As we mentioned
last year, these notices are misleading and will continue to be required as we
slowly regain value previously lost. City's who chose to adopt the effective tax
rate when values declined would not be faced with this situation since they
would have continued to levy a higher tax each year and have kept their
revenue base up. So, if we are fortunate enough to recoup a small amount of
value again this year, we will once again be required to publish similar
notices.
Currently, we expect property tax rVinquent
ue for FY2012 to fall short of budget
by about $64K due to a decline in de collections. We have included a
calculation of the projected FY2013 revenue using both May estimates with a
4% reduction and the June estimates to show the significant variation that
could occur given the new protest procedures. The difference between the
May valuations and the June valuation is approximately $502K. Obviously,
this could have a major impact on our decisions between now and the August
budget meetings.
Sales tax is the City's second largest source of revenue. In 2008, the City
collected approximately $14.3M in total sales tax revenue. During FY2009
and FY2010, revenue declined a total of $1.9M or 13.9%. Currently, we are
expecting to end FY2012 with approximately $14.1M which represents a
recovery of approximately $1.8M. This leaves sales tax revenue down
approximately $167K from FY2008.
For 2012, we budgeted a 2.5% growth rate but actual collections have been
more than 4% over our budget. For FY2013, we are projecting an increase of
2%, which if �c ieved, would finally return us to 2008 levels.
� (At1J a.,3A
Franchise fees represent approximately approx. 13°/ he general fund
budget and expected to exceed budget by $10K. 013
Fines and fees represent approximately 14% of the general fund budget and
are currently expected to fall short,,,b3� approximately $102K. We hope this
will begin to increase due to th fires that have been made within the police
department to fill vacancies.7x2U13
•
License and Permits represent approximately 3% of the general fund budget
and are currently expected to exceed budget by $71K. FY2:013
The car rental fund also saw declines in FY2009 and FY2010 totaling
approximately $1.3M. We expect to end FY12 with approximately $12.8M
which is about $583K better than originally budgeted and just slightly shy of
2008 levels. While we don't expect much growth in FY2013, we are projecting
this revenue to remain relatively stable.
The water and wastewater fund is expected to end the year with revenues
down about $227k less than budget due to decreased consumption.
We have been notified by Trinity River Authority that they are not expecting
any change in the price they charge us for water; however they are projecting
an increase in the cost of wastewater treatment of 13C per 1,000 gallons.
Remember, this may change.
If you recall, TRA increased the rate that the City pays for water by 2 U last
year and you authorized a rebate of this amount for residential usage up to
15K gallons.
Based on projected expenses for FY13, we do expect some rate adjustments
will be necessary and will bring you details in August but are hopeful that we
can again recommend drawing down funds from rate stabilization to help
offset a portion of any necessary increase.
On the expenditure side, directors have been asked to hold the line on
baseline increases to the essential items which are currently less than 1%.
This is needed to cover increased maintenance costs, contractual increases
and general operating costs.
We expect to recommend a small salary increase for employees but do not
expect to fund any of the 19 currently unfunded positions. We are hopeful that
a few of the funded but vacant position can be released as funding becomes
5
availa e. (We are looking at the possibility of funding Pdditional police
officer)fed• le.)
Departments remain committed to maintaining service levels.
'0 5 1 1 6A ( T- �Axwk
You should each have a CIP book for FY2013.
It includes a section that provides details of all of the currently funded
projects, explains any overages or shortages associated with those projects
and provides timelines related to the expected completion dates. These
projects will be tracked each year in the funded section until they are
completed and closed and any excess funds are returned to Capital Fund
Balance for reallocation.You may want to turn to page 1 & 2 behind the funded
tab to follow along with the recap of the currently funded projects.
We have four funded drainage projects.
The first is the Misc. Drainage Improvements. This project is used for various
drainage projects and emergency repairs identified throughout the year. For
FY13, we recommend sweeping the Drainage CIP fund balance and any excess
operating reserves, to this project to make it available for various bank
stabilization issues throughout the city. We currently estimate there will be
approximately $450K available to supplement this project.
The second is a flood mitigation project that has a balance of $482K. These
funds are available to address any serious property flooding including the
potential acquisition of property.
The third project is for misc. creek maintenance. This project is used for the
removal of trees, brush, and debris that may impede the flow of creek water.
This project has a suggested minimum balance of $100K. Due to current year
expenses, an additional $55K is requested in FY13. This can also be funded
from Drainage CIP Fund Balance.
The last drainage project is Boyd Branch improvements. As we have
discussed in the past, much of this drainage channel is the responsibility of the
adjacent property owners and would require considerable participation from
the property owners. Although listed as a Priority A, this project is unlikely to
occur without significant redevelopment of the area.
The Drainage CIP has a Fund Balan $227K and we project the operating
fund will have approximatel 8K that ca a used to fund the two requests
mentioned.
•
In the Street Fund we have six funded projects.
•
The South Pipeline Road Bridge replacement is a joint project with the City of
FW, and is expected to be completed in July. The City of Euless is paying 25%
of the project not to exceed $157K. This project is adequately funded.
` Ash Lane is under construction and projected to be completed in November.
It includes a total reconstruction from North Main to Aransas including the
replacement of the water and wastewater line, underground drainage, and
i sidewalks. This project is partially funded by Tarrant County and we are
currently estimating the project to still come in under budget.
The Glade Park infrastructure project includes authorization for the
infrastructure outline in the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone which
generally includes Rio Grande, Brazos Blvd, portions of Heritage Avenue,
water and wastewater systems, and drainage utilities. Phase I has been
funded and completed and portions of Phase II are underway but are being
funded by the developer at this point. The development agreement provides
for very specific conditions that must be met before the remaining phases are
funded.
•
The FY2012 County overlays included Aransas Drive from Midway to
Harwood and Slaughter Lane from Dunaway Drive to Dickey Drive. Aransas is
complete and Slaughter is expected to be completed in July. No additional
funding is needed for this project.
Various improvements are being made citywide to sidewalks and curb ramps
to comply with requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. These
improvements will qualify for CDBG funds and you will see a multi -year plan
in the unfunded section to address these issues.
The miscellaneous street repair project is used for replacement of
deteriorated sections of pavement throughout the city. Staff recommends a
minimum balance of $150K. Based on the extreme cold temperatures
followed by extreme drought, we expect to deplete the existing funds and are
requesting $150K to replenish this project. We recommend this be funded
from Street CIP fund balance which currently has a balance of $480K.
In the Wastewater CIP, four projects are currently funded.
The miscellaneous rehab program currently has a balance of $101K. Funds
from this project are available to address wastewater line breaks that occur
throughout the year and no additional funding is required at this time.
The TRA Wastewater Payment project is funded from Wastewater Impact fees
which is restricted to expenditures related to system expansion. Based on the
impact fee study, we are currently allocating $60K annually for debt
associated with system expansion at the Trinity River Authority. This has the
impact of reducing the costs to water and wastewater customers.
The wastewater line replacement projects include:
Replacement of mains along Fuller Branch from E. Huitt Lane, along Ascot
Drive to Dunaway Drive and down to Whitner. This project is nearing
completion.
The next wastewater replacement is generally located between Crane and
Blanco and Blanco and Aransas, south of Harwood. This project is currently
under design and no additional funding is needed.
The 371h year CDBG project provided for line replacement along Collin Drive
and between Falls & Fannin, Fannin & Travis, Travis & Dallas, and Dallas &
Tarrant. This project is complete and came in significantly under budget and
the excess funds are being returned to the W/WW fund balance ($105K) to be
reallocated to future projects. Excess CDBG funds ($111K) will be available for
allocation to future CDBG projects.
The last funded wastewater project is the required line relocation associated
with the North Tarrant Express construction which runs from east of Dock
MZtftmis to Hwy 157. The estimated total cost is $454K; however, we a
anticipate receiving approximately $303K from NTE as payment for
displacement of current easements, as well as plan review and inspections.
NTE has not yet begun the project and payment is not due.until project
completion. > , i y rily'
The eight funded Water projects include:
Miscellaneous water rehab is used to repair water main breaks that occur
Nt
throughout the year and has fallen below the minimum recommended level
�.. v ($150). We are requesting an additional $100K to be funded from the W/WW
Operating fund balance to replenish this project.
The water tank debt is paid annually from Water Impact fees and is used to
pay debt service on the Heritage water tank and associated lines. This was a
qualified impact fee project.
The Well repair project was depleted this year due to a number of well repairs
and equipment failures so we are requesting $200K to replenish funding.
Funding is available from W/WW CIP fund balance.
The reclaimed water main to Texas Star has been completed and the
extension from the city limits to the pond at Midway and Bear Creek is
nearing completion. This project will be cc5leted within budget.
The Transponder and Meter program was established to provide for the
replacement of meters larger than 1". This project is ongoing and funding is
transferred annually from the operating budget.
The TRA Water Payment project is funded from Water Impact fees and like
wastewater is restricted to expenditures related to system expansion. Based
on the impact fee study, we are currently allocating $150K annually for debt
associated with system expansion at the Trinity River Authority. This also
helps reduce the cost to water and wastewater customers.
The Reclaimed Water Line Extension project is a proposed extension of the
reclaimed water system north along Bear Creek Parkway that could serve a
number of apartment communities. Staff is continuing to work with Allan
Plummer to assess the feasibility of this project. They are working to identify
optimal routes and associated costs. We hope to have more information for
you on this project in August. If the project proves feasible, it would require a
debt sale.;
The Standpipe Storage tank and Building demolition project will not be
completed due to the sale of the property. These funds will be returned to CIP
fund balance.
An update to the Water and Wastewater Impact fee study is required every
five years. The consultant is currently reviewing land uses and water demand.
He may recommend a full study or just an administrative review based on i J
necessary changes.
The Water and Wastewater CIP fund has approximately $856K that has been
returned from completed projects and is available for FY2013 Water and
Wastewater Capital needs.
Finally, in the Other Funded Projects
Phase IV of the Texas Star Sports complex includes the design and
construction of a concession and restroom facility which is being built by the
Sting Soccer Association in exchange for use of the property and addition
parking that is being provided by the City. It also includes fencing, lighting and
concession equipment. Based upon current estimates this project will need an
additional $46,217. We recommended a transfer from EDC CIP fund balance
to cover the additional costs.
We have $22K left in the monument sign program which will be retained until
needed.
We have $278K in the redevelopment project for future opportunities that
may provide economic benefit to the City.
The EDC Incentive project currently has $150K which will be used to pay our
incentive agreement with US Concrete. This payment will be made before the
end of the FY12. We will make the annual $25K transfer in FY13 from the EDC
operating fund.
We have also maintained a $100K for a planning consultant, $250K for EDC
contingency, and $47K for ADA facility improvements. No additional funds
are needed for these projects at this time.
The Miscellaneous Golf Improvement project provides funding for
improvements in the Conference Center and on the course. During the
current year, this funding has been used to provide upgrades to the AV
system, bunker replacement and new water heaters and shades and sound
panels for the garden room. We are requesting an additional $100K be
transferred from the Golf Course reserve fund to maintain the recommended
$150K,balance.
The Police and Court facility has a project balance of $108K that is reserved
for repairs to the facility.
The Misc. Park Improvements is used for upgrades to pavilions, playgrounds,
picnic tables, gazebos and lighting throughout the parks. We are
recommending an additional $75K be transferred from the EDC Operating
Fund to restore this project to the recommended $100K minimum balance.
The EDC operating fund provides $25K annually for enhancements to park
irrigation throughout the city parks system.
Funding was provided last year for the design of the indoor and outdoor
aquatic facility in the amount of $786,500 . An architect has been retained for
the design of the structures and for consulting services related to the aquatics.
The estimated cost has been reduced to $550K and the remaining funds have
been returned for the construction phase of the project.
If you will turn to pages 89-92 in your CIP Book, you will find a summary of
the Unfunded Projects. Behind each tab is a detailed description of each
project.
Currently no proposed drainage projects
Proposed 2013 Street Projects includes the 38th year CDBG project as well as
continuation of the county overlay program.
The 38th year CDBG project will fund ADA improvements at various locations
throughout the City and consists of sidewalk and ramp improvements to
provide accessibility as mandated by federal and State ADA standards. This
project is projected at $450K. Funding is provided from the Community
Development Block Grant.
•
The next project includes a request for $300K to fund the FY2013 County
Overlay program which includes Trailwood from N. Main Street to Summit
Ridge.
•
And Summit Ridge from Lakewood Blvd to Trailwood Drive,
and Westpark Way from S. Pipeline to SH10.
We recommend this be funded from the Car Rental Operating fund.
•
The Wastewater CIP includes a request for:
•
Funding three sanitary sewer line replacements
•
The first project serves Ross Avenue and the outfall to West Alexander Lane.
This project is estimated at $215K.
The second project will replace wastewater mains in the vicinity of Slaughter
Lane, Dunaway Drive and E. Huitt. This project is estimated at $475K.
•
The last FY2013 wastewater project is the line replacement between Linda
Lane and W. Huitt. This project is estimated at $180K. These line are 40+
years old and in need of replacement.
Staff recommends that these projects be funded from the Water and
Wastewater Operating fund that is committed for infrastructure replacement.
No Water Projects Proposed
•
The Other Capital Requests includes the construction phase of the EFL Aquatic
Facility. The budget has been reduced to $6,450,000 for both the indoor and
outdoor facilities based on study and evaluation of other facilities during the
past year. With the funding previously accumulated for the project, staff
recommends that it be funded in cash with accumulated reserves from the
General CIP and Car Rental Fund.
Looking out 5 years, we don't have any recommended B priority drainage
project and the street projects are limited to County Overlay projects and ADA
improvements.
In the Water and Wastewater Fund, we would recommend continuing the line
replacement program and we will need to plan for the second phase of utility
relocations associated with the North Tarrant Express construction. In
addition, we need to plan for a city-wide residential meter replacement
program as these will be reaching end of life.
In the Other Section, the 5 year plan includes a trail connection to Glade Parks,
improvements to Blessing Branch Park, construction of Phase V at the Texas
Star Sports Complex, remodel of the Development and Engineering Bldg,
improvements to the sand bunkers and the potential replacement of the
greens at the Texas Star Golf Course.
During FY2012, sales tax continued to recover and we are currently expecting
to end the year with approximately $554K more than budgeted with $340K of
that representing the general fund portion.
Based on these revenues and expenses, we expect to end FY2013 with
$7,533,580 of fund balance. Backing out designated funds and reserve levels
equal to 60 days of expenditures in accordance with the fiscal policy, we
expect to have approximately $2.1M available for capital and supplemental
needs. This is due in large part to the FY2011 savings and the additional
revenues expected from the current year. These funds are available for your
allocation as you consider capital and departmental requests.
The Half Cent Sales Tax fund, also known as the EDC fund, will likely end the
year with approximately $1.6M in fund balance. The Board has established a
reserve limit of $500K so we anticipate having approximately $1.1M available
for capital and supplemental needs.
The Car Rental Fund is expecting revenues of $12.8M with expenditures of
$10.2M including the payment of 2/3rd of the revenue to Dallas and Fort
Worth. This will leave approximately $5.2M of fund balance. After deducting
the $2M reserve level established by the City Council, we expect to have
available approximately $3.2M. This budget contemplates a transfer to the
general fund equal to 1/3 of Euless' portion of the revenue to support general
government operations. The remaining funds are available for capital
projects.
City of Euless
Tiered Rate Analysis
Average Bill Comparison
Customer type:
Residential
Residential
Usage in gallons:
10,000
20,000
Meter Size:
5/8"
5/8"
City
Billing
Billing
Euless
$
41.33
$
83.03
Fort Worth
$
38.29
$
80.31
Irving
$
35.11
$
74.61
Dallas
$
30.72
$
85.12
Denton
$
45.00
$
85.50
Arlington
$
27.57
$
59.52
Carrollton
$
31.91
$
67.71
Garland
$
43.09
$
89.44
Southlake
$
54.99
$
93.49
Mansfield
$
43.09
$
70.49
.ChydfEsiess
7Yeie4 Wafer Rate Atea&sts
_
City of Euless
City of Fort Worth
City of Irving
City of Dallas
City of Denton
Effective October 1, 2011
Effective January 1, 2011
Effective October 1,2011?
Effective October 1, 1011
Effective October 1,
2011
ccf = one hundred cubic feet = 748 gallons
Rates based on meter size
Usage charged per 1000
gallons
Usage charged per 1000 gallons
includes first 3000 gallons
Vol Chg
In FW
Residential
Res Sprinkler
Residential
Vol Chg
per 1000
Residential, A artmen Commercial
Residential
Vol Chg
Residential Volume Charms
up to 2,000 gallons
$
2.48 $
3.74
First 8 ccf (5,984 gat..)
$
1.97
$
2.63
First 3000 gals included in base
$
-
Up to 4000 gals
$
1.68
Winter (Nov - Apr)
S
3.30
3,000 to 8,000
S
3.41 $
3.74
8-20 ccf (5,985 -14,%0 gals)
$
2.80
$
3.74
Next 7000 gals
$
3.73
4001 to 10000
S
3.35
9,000 to 15,000
$
3.98 $
3.98
20-30 ccf (14,961- 22,440 gals)
$
3.48
$
4.65
Next 10000 gals
S
3.95
10001 to 15000
S
4.63
Summer (May - Oct)
16,000 to 35,000
$
4.36 $
4.36
> 30 ccf (> 22,440 gals)
$
4.20
$
5.61
> 20000 gals
> 15000
$
6.25
up to 15,000 gals
$
330
Over 35,000
$
4.96 S
4.96
Irrigation (first 50 ccf) (37,400 gals)
$
2.80
$
3.74
Oct -May (Winter)
$
4.13
15,001 to 30,000 gals
$
480
Irrigation (50 - 100 ccf) (to 74,800 gals) S
3.48
$
4.65
June -Sept (Summer)
30,001 to 50,000 gals
$
6.00
Irrigation (> 100 ccf) (> 74,800 gals)
$
4.20
$
5.61
Residential
$
4.49
> 50,000 gals
S
7.20
Gas well use (all volumes)
$
4.50
$
6.02
Apt & Comm
$
4.37
Monthly service charge
Monthly service charge
Customer Chg
Water
Meter size
Svc Chg
Meter size
Svc Chg
Meter size
Svc
Chg
Meter size
Svc
Ch
5/8" or 3/4"
$
7.95
5/8" or 3/4"
$
7.50
Facility Charge
Mo
5/8" or 3/4" $ 9.00
5/8" S 3.90
I"
S
9.29
3/4" X 3/4"
$
7.55
V
$
10.91
3/4"
$
4.57
3/4" Meter
$
12.00
I''/,"
$
13.02
1"
s
11.00
ly'.
$
15.30
1"
S
6.64
1" Meter
$
15.65
2"
$
21.57
1W,
S
19.00
2"
S
21.59
1%,"
$
I2.50
1%" Meter
$
20.05
3"
S
43.58
2"
S
28.50
3"
$
34.76
2"
$
19.53
2" Meter
S
22.90
4"
$
77.35
3"
$
61.75
4"
S
48.66
3"
$
46.88
5"
S
121.97
4"
$
108.00
6"
$
85.10
4"
S
78.13
6"
S
174.03
6"
$
235.00
8"
$
107.49
6"
S
156.26
8"
$
402.00
10"
$
156.24
8"
S
261.74
10"
S
630.00
12"
S
232.64
10" & >
S
398.47
Commercial (tg)
Business Rates by Class per
1000
Business Rates by Class
per 1000
General Services
Winter (Nov - Apr)
Summer (May - Oct)
S
S
3.70
4.45
Commercial - all volumes $ 3.74
Commercial - all volumes (ccf) $ 2.23 $ 2.98
Up to 10,000 gals $ 2.35
> 10,000 gals
S
2.85
Fire Hydrant/Gas Well/Supplemental Irrigation:
Industrial
Industrial
> 10,000 gals & 1.4 X
Facility Charge
Mo
All volumes per 1,000 gallons
S
6.60
All volumes
$
2.09
$
2.79
> 3000 gals
S
3.51
Annual Avg Mo Usage
$
4.12
3/4" Meter
S
21 95
Superuser
$
1.70
S
2.27
1" Meter
S
26.25
Optional General Services
1 %" Meter
$
31.10
Ist 1 million gals
S
1,753.79
2" Meter
$
40.15
> I million (per 1000)
S
2.29
Monthly service charges -
Same as residential table
Monthly service charges - Same as residential table
Untreated Water
Uninterruptible
S
0.4718
Interruptible
S
0.2257
Residential water bill for 10,000 gallons
Residential water bill for 10,000 gallons
Residential water bill for 10,000 gals
Residential water bill for 10,000 gallons
Residential water bill 10,000 gals
First 2000
S
4.96
First 5,984 gallons
$
15.76
First 3,000 gallons
$
-
First 4,000 gallons
S
6.72
First 10,000 gallons
S
33.00
Next 6000
$
20.46
Next 4,016 gallons
$
15.03
Next 7,000 gallons
S
26.11
Next 6,000 gallons
$
20.10
Next 2000
$
7.96
Base Rate
$
7.50
Base Rate
$
9.00
Base Rate
$
3.90
Base Rate
$
12.00
Base Rate
$
7.95
Total monthly water bill
S
38.29
Total monthly water bill
S
35.11
Total monthly water bill
$
30.72
Total mo water bill
$
4500
Total monthly water bill
$
41.33
Residential water bill for 20,000 gallons
Residential water bill for 20,000 gals
Residential water bill for 20,000 gallons
Residential water bill 20,000 gals
Residential water bill for 20,000 gallons
First 5,984 gallons
$
15.76
First 3,000 gallons
S
-
First 4,000 gallons
$
6.72
First 15,000 gallons
$
49.50
First 2000
$
4.96
Next 8,976 gallons
$
33.60
Next 7,000 gallons
S
26.11
Next 6,000 gallons
$
20.10
Next 5,000 gallons
S
24.00
Next 6000
S
20.46
Next 5,040 gallons
S
23.45
Next 10,000 gallons
S
39.50
Next 5,000 gallons
$
23.15
Base Rate
$
12.00
Next 7000
$
27.86
Base Rate
$
7.50
Base Rate
S
9.00
Next 5,000 gallons
S
31.25
Total mo wnter bill
S
85.50
Next 5000
$
21.80
Total monthly water bill
S
80.31
Total monthly water bill
S
74.61
Base Rate
$
3.90
Base Rate
$
7.95
Total monthly water bill
S
85.12
Total monthly water bill
$
83.03
Clly of Euless.. .
77ered Water Rate Analysis
May d, 2012
City of Arlington
City of Carrollton
City of Garland
City of Southlake
City of Mansfield
Effective October 1, 2011
Effective February 1, 2010
Effective October 1, 1011
Effective November 1, 2011?
Effective November 2010
Usage charged per 1000 gallons
Usage charged per 1000 gallons
Usage charged per 1000 gallons
Usage charged per 1000 gallons
Usage charged per 1000 gallons
First 2000 gals included in minimum
First 2000 gals included in minimum
First 2000 gals included in minimum
Residential Water Conservation Rates
Residential Volume Charges
Residential Volume Charges
Residential Volume Charges
Residential Volume Charges
0 - 2000 gals
S
1.42
Winter (Oct - Apr) > 2000 gals
$
2.66
3,000 - 10,000 gals
$
2.02
0-3,000 $
2.77
0-2,000 $ 28.35
0-2,000 $
11,000 - 15,000 gals
$
2.98
Summer (May - Oct)
Next 12,000 $
3.64
2,001 - 10,000 S 3.33
2,001 - 32,000 $ 2.74
16,000 - 29,000 gals
$
3.41
Next 8,000 gals
$
2.66
> 15,000 $
5.63
10,001 - 25,000 $ 3.85
> 32,000 $ 3.43
> 29,000 gals
$
4.08
10,001 - 25000 gals
$
3.58
25,001 - 40,000 $ 4.12
> 25,000 gals
$
4.49
> 40,000 S 4.64
Commercial, Apts, Portable Mtrs,
Industrial, and Irrigation
Customer Chg
Water
Monthly service charge
Residential, Commercial, Industrial
Meter size
Svc Chg
Meter size
Wa Svc Chg
Meter size Svc Chg
Meter size Svc Ch
3/4" (< 2000 gal) Res only $ 5.00
5/8" $ 10.63
5/8" $ 9.30
5/8" or 3/4" $ 21.17
3/4" (>3,000 gals) All cust class
$
8.57
1"
$
16.38
3/4" $
12.00
1" S 52.90
V
$
15.00
1 %,"
S
25.99
1 W, S 105.82
1 V?
$
34.28
2"
$
37.50
2" S 169.30
2"
$
59.99
3"
$
68.21
3" $ 338.59
3"
S
138.77
4"
$
102.75
4" S 581.95
4"
S
222.75
6"
S
198.73
6" S 1,191.42
6'
$
517.89
8"
S
313.91
8"
S
811.55
10"
$
448.26
Minimum residential using < 2000 gals
10" & >
$ 1,219.05
Fire line
$
57.90
$ 7.15
Portable
$
68.21
Commercial Volume Charges
Other Water Conservation Rates
Irrigation
Next 8,000 gals
$
2.23
0-2,000 S
Commercial to 15,000 gals S 2.08
Commercial > 15,000
$
2.38
> 10,000 gals
$
2.95
2,001 - 32,000 $ 2.74
> 25,000 gals
$
3.09
> 32,000 $ 3.43
Construction to 99,000 gals
S
4.75
Construction> 99,000 gals
$
6.00
Commercial (incl. apts. & portable meters)
Industrial Volume Charges
All use over 2000 gals
$
1.81
Irrigation to 29,000 gals
$
3.41
0-2,000 included in base
Irrigation > 29,000 gals
$
4.08
Industrial
2,001 - 32,000 $ 2.06
All use over 2000 gals
$
1.52
> 32,000 S 2.57
Residential water bill for 10,000 gallons
Residential water bill for 10,000 gallons
Residential water bill 10,000 gals
Residential water bill 10,000 gals
Residential water bill 10,000 gals
First 2,000 gallons
$
2.84
First 2,000 gallons
$
-
First 3,000 gallons S
8.31
Pass Thru $ -
First 2,000 gallons $ -
Next 8,000 gallons
$
16.16
Next 8,000 gallons
$
21.28
Next 7,000 gallons S
25.48
Next 8,000 gallons S 26.64
Next 8,000 gallons $ 21.92
Base Rate
$
8.57
Base Rate
$
10.63
Base Rate S
9.30
Base Rate S 28.35
Base Rate S 21.17
Total monthly water bill
$
27.57
Total monthly water bill
$
31.91
Total mo water bill S
43.09
Total mo water bill S 54.99
Total mo water bill $ 43.09
Residential water bill for 20,000 gallons
Residential water bill for 20,000 gallons
Residential water bill 20,000 gals
Residential water bill 20,000 gals
Residential water bill 20,000 gals
First 2,000 gallons
$
2.84
First 2,000 gallons
$
-
First 3,000 gallons S
8.31
First 2,000 gallons $ -
First 2,000 gallons S
Next 8,000 gallons
$
16.16
Next 8,000 gallons
$
21.28
Next 12,000 gallons $
43.68
Next 8,000 gallons $ 26.64
Next 18,000 gallons S 49.32
Next 5,000 gallons
$
14.90
Next 10,000 gallons
$
35.80
Next 5,000 gallons S
28.15
Next 10,000 gallons $ 38.50
Base Rate S 21.17
Next 5,000 gallons
$
17.05
Base Rate
$
10.63
Base Rate $
9.30
Base Rate S 28.35
Total mo water bill $ 70.49
Base Rate
$
8.57
Total monthly water bill
$
67.71
Total mo water bill S
89.44
Total mo water bill S 93.49
Total monthly water bill
$
59.52