Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFY 1994 Annual Investment Report • T H E C I T Y O F EULESS Annual Investment Report Fiscal Year 1993/94 INTRODUCTION This report is written and submitted in accordance with Texas State law, specifically Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. Art. 4413 (34C) Section 4, which states that "at least once each year, the investment officer of a state agency or political subdivision shall prepare a written report concerning the agency's or subdivision's local funds investment transactions for the preceding year and describing in detail the investment position of the agency or subdivision as of the date of the report." The City's investment policy designates the Director of Fiscal & Human Resources as the responsible manager for the City's investment program and as such has delegated the daily investment procedures to the Cash & Debt Manager. In compliance with the City's investment policy, the Cash & Debt Manager fulfills four main objectives: compliance, safety, liquidity and yield, in that order. Compliance is maintained through regular reporting to City management on a monthly, quarterly and annual basis. Safety is insured by 1) investing only in those securities allowed by Art. 842(a-2, V.T.C.S.) entitled the "Public Funds Investment Act of 1987" with revisions in 1989, 1991 and 1993; 2) using delivery vs. payment for all purchases (payment for securities is made upon delivery); 3) protecting all non-government securities. (cash and bank certificates of deposit) with collateral in the form of government securities which are pledged to the City of Euless and safekept at a third party institution; 4) diversifying investment purchases into different security markets to minimize individual market risk. Liquidity is met by matching investment terms to future operating cash needs such as payroll, accounts payables, debt service and capital improvement disbursements. Furthermore, investment in money market funds and local government investment pools provides the safety and daily liquidity needs of the City. The yield or rate of return which the City receives is measured against the average 90 day treasury bill yield as set by the investment policy. This 'benchmark" has been extremely difficult to meet this year as the market rate has been increased several times in a very short period. The information contained in this report will quantitatively and graphically explain the achievement of these City objectives for fiscal year 1993-94. I. PORTFOLIO SUMMARY Diversification by Instrument - The following table describes the composition of the City's portfolio as of 9/30/94. Instrument $ Cost %, Average Yield C.D.s $100,000 0.4% 3.30% Treasuries 2,541,839 11.1% 4.35% Agencies 8,859,701 38.6% 4.62% Money Market 2,977,841 13.0% 4.55% Repo 8,500,000 37.0% 4.50% 22,979,382 100.0% This table shows that the majority of City funds, approximately 39% are invested in government agency securities which provide safety and as of the date of this report, the highest average yield in the portfolio. This year the City replaced the investment pool, Local Government Investment Fund for Texas managed by Fidelity, with other instruments: Prudential Investment Liquidity Portfolio, Financial Guaranty Insurance Company, and Local Government Investment Cooperative. This was necessary as Fidelity closed their fund, however, this event provided an excellent opportunity to analyze other alternatives which recently became available. Diversification by Maturity - The table below reflects the degree of liquidity the City retains particularly with the use of more overnight investment alternatives. This high level of liquidity is in an attempt to "keep up" with the rapid rise in market rates. # of days $-Cost % of Portfolio 1 - 30 $13,529,592 59% 31 - 90 4,018,460 17% 91 - 180 982,422 4% 181- 365 1,999,531 9% Over 365 2,449.377 11% $22,979,382 100% City Portfolio City Portfolio By Instrument By Maturity (38.6%) _ ®C.D.s (58.9%) Em 1 - 30 (11.1% =Treasuries 31 - 90 (0.4%) EMAgencies EM 91 - 180 (10.7%) 13.0% —J �z `��` Money Market ) /' .�,;;:;�.;;�,.. C] ,� 181- 365 (37.0%) Repo (17.5/0) (4.�10� ) =Over 365 3 ` City of Euless Portfolio Summary for 09/30194 Repurchase Total By ;itv lnyestme�r is P9Q % CDs % Treasuries % Agencies % Inst�tutron °6 REPO-Landmark 8,500,000.00 37.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,500.00000 37.0 Western Amer. Nat'l Bk 100,000.00 0.4 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.41 Merrill Lynch 0.00 507,367.49 2.2 2,864,092.19 12.5 3,371,459.68 14.7 Masterson Moreland 0.00 0.00 499,843.75 499.843.75 2.2 Shearson Lehman 0.00 1,449,376.50 6.3 0.00 0.0 1,449,376.50 6.3 Southwest Securities 0.00 585,095.43 2.5 986,394.44 1,571,489.87 6.8 Prudential 0.00 0.00 4,509,370.79 19.6 4,509,370.79 19.6 PILP 2,977,841.28 13.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,977,841.28 13.0 Total Investment 11,477,841.28 100,000.00 2,541,839.42 8,859,701.17 22,979,381.87 100.0 49.9% 0.4% 11.1% 38.6% 100.00% Diversification Guidelines %of Portfolio By Instrument: US Treasury Bills 100% US Government Agencies 100% Investment Pools 75% Repurchase Agreements 25% CD's(Commercial Banks) 100% By Institution: "Repurchase Agreements no more than 10% All Other no more than 33% Investment Pools no more than$10 million **Due to the receipt of$8,500,000 in bond proceeds the diversification guidelines have been temporaily waived until City Council approves new investment ograms. Reviewed by: J L% Cash&Debt Manager " Date: Director of Fiscal Date: &Human Resources II. PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Cash and Investments Balances - Full utilization of funds and minimization of idle cash is necessary to pursue additional interest income revenues for the City. The average % of invested funds is 101% for FY94 fulfilling that objective. The monthly data below shows a greater utilization of City funds through investments. Consolidated Invested Percentage Cash Balance Invested Oct 92 ($66,286) $11,229,793 101% Nov (61,111) 11,228,872 101% Dec 435,574 11,887,349 96% Jan 93 (154,154) 13,347,645 101% Feb (232,979) 13,498,919 102% Mar (2,672) 12,697,617 100% Apr (242,840) 12,361,070 102% May 454,348 13,288,022 97% Jun (92,761) 13,078,456 101% Jul (188,091) 12,242,221 102% Aug (79,080) 12,482,476 101% Sept (823,099) 12,224,664 107% Average (87,763) 12,463,925 101% Consolidated Invested Percentage Cash Balance Invested Oct 93 $291,963 $11,956,004 98% Nov 130,163 12,365,269 99% Dec 44,757 12,898,051 100% Jan 94 (230,220) 15,871,761 101% Feb 604,719 15,587,920 96% Mar (134,037) 14,881,280 101% Apr (92,556) 15,702,965 101% May (295,414) 15,847,747 102% Jun (433,300) 15,649,554 103% Jul (476,494) 14,591,447 103% Aug (16,387) 14,606,045 100% Sept (414,103) 22,979,382 102% Average (85,076) 15,244,785 101% *Includes $8,500,000 Half Penny Sales Tax Revenue Bond Proceeds. 5 This graph shows how a greater portion of the City's funds continue to be invested, always in pursuit of 100%. 110% — 105% - - 100% 95% LL k xkC 85% ... 80% 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Fiscal Year This graph shows that cash at the bank is minimized to allow for more investments. 1275 ------ -- • �c 775 CZ c CU o r s ca � U 275 -225 - L- 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Fiscal Year The two graphs present how cash and investments are actively being managed resulting in additional interest income revenues for the City. Cash management performance - effectiveness of the cash management program has been measured utilizing actual figures for FY94 as shown below: Average City's Number Estimated 90 day Invested Days in Interest Month TBill Yield Balance Month Earnings Oct 93 3.07% $11,956,004 31 31,174 Nov 3.16% 12,365,269 30 32,116 Dec 3.11% 12,898,051 31 34,069 Jan 94 3.03% 15,871,761 31 40,845 Feb 3.33% 15,587,920 28 39,820 Mar 3.25% 14,881,280 31 41,076 Apr 3.60% 15,702,965 30 46,464 May 4.24% 15,847,747 31 57,069 Jun 4.33% 15,649,554 30 55,695 Jul 4.42% 14,591,447 31 54,776 Aug 4.68% 14,606,045 31 58,056 Sept 4.85% 22,979,382 30 91,603 Estimated earnings at benchmark yields: $582,762 Actual FY94 interest income (pre-audit): $688,661 Earnings over benchmark: $105,899 The table above presents an estimated amount the city would have earned for the past year on just matching the benchmark yield which has been a very difficult task as the market rates have risen faster than the portfolio turnover. The operational budget for Cash Management is $49,517 for FY94. A net benefit of $56,382 for additional City revenues. 7 Key rate comparisons - an objective of the investment policy is for the City's rate of return to consistently exceed that of the three month U.S. Treasury Bill, as stated before. Therefore, they have been presented for comparative purposes below. 90 day City's Avg Month T-bill yield Portfolio Yld Difference Oct 93 3.07% 3.46% 0.39% Nov 3.16% 3.51% 0.35% Dec 3.11% 3.48% 0.37% Jan 94 3.03% 3.47% 0.44% Feb 3.33% 3.56% 0.23% Mar 3.25% 3.53% 0.28% Apr 3.60% 3.75% 0.15% May 4.24% 3.90% -0.34% Jun 4.33% 3.98% -0.35% Jul 4.42% 4.13% -0.29% Aug 4.68% 4.18% -0.50% Sept 4.85% 4.52% -0.33% Average 3.75% 3.79% 0.04% As mentioned in the last quarterly report, this comparison illustrates the Fed's proactive approach to the fear of inflation, dramatic increases in market rates. This has allowed for the negative outcome in the comparison above. The cash management program provides for full investment of City funds to maturity dates which meet liquidity requirements at the best rates on a given day. When rapid increases in the market rates occur, it is difficult to match those rates as the portfolio's maturity schedules do not match the Fed's movements! Euless is not alone as other cities are obviously facing this dilemma. However, on a positive note, Euless is not one of the several government entities facing investment losses and liquidity problems. III. INTEREST INCOME SUMMARY FY92 Audit $873,288 FY93 Audit $508,975 FY94 Budget $565,481 FY94 Pre- Audit $688,661 Interest Income Received versus Budgeted: 122% Interest income met the budgeted level for fiscal year 1994. This year experienced a very volatile market as the Fed funds rate spiked by 175 basis points within a period of six months! Market rate outlook - the Fed has increased rates five times this year since February. The market is awaiting yet another hike by 50 basis points at the least. The unknown factor is when. Chairman Greenspan believes this action will head off inflation even though it remains relatively mild. Given this scenario, investors are keeping their portfolios very short until the Fed takes action. Over 75% of the City's portfolio is available within 90 days. Interest ncome By Fund For Fiscal Year Ending 1994 Fund FY 93 FY 93 FY 94 FY 94 _# Bud et Audit Rev Budget Pre Audit Difference 1 154,000 152,815 220,000 207,625 12,375 2 111,150 126,375 170,000 181,644 11,644 4 100,002 22,628 17,000 18,770 1,770 8 5,000 12,000 11,300 12,890 1,590 9 24,587 24,000 27,563 3,563 12 1,100 3,969 4,200 4,979 779 17 5,000 2,435 12,000 16,676 4,676 18 0 20 236 0 21 7,000 4,453 7,000 7,192 192 24 652 800 1,316 516 26 10,000 10,092 10,000 10,954 954 27 0 29 16,952 9,700 11,097 1,397 30 43,306 44,994 47,981 47,981 0 39 10,000 40,954 14,000 13,980 20 40 4,234 6,500 8,837 2,337 50 11,000 36,838 25,838 90 41,598 80,319 80.319 Total 446,558 508,974 565,481 688,661 123,180 122% Note that interest earnings is being earned by all investable City funds and most funds met their budgeted level. 9 IV. COLLATERAL REVIEW The first and most important objective of investing public funds is safety. This year has been a very good lesson for those that made this objective a less priority. One way to insure the City's assets is to have them fully secured with "collateral". Acceptable collateral is defined in the City's investment policy, but generally consists of types of securities the City would invest in. Bank balances are monitored daily to assure their full coverage. The amount of collateral required by the depository bank varies with the expected level of deposits (typically correlates with large receipts such as property taxes, franchise taxes and investment maturities). Euless --- Collateral Analysis for Cash & C.D. Investments _... ... , _......_ as of 09/30/94 Pledging Safekeeping Pledged Sec. Security Market Value Inv. Value Difference 9 9 P 9 9 tY Institution Location Description Par Value (w/FDIC Ins.) Mat'y(P & I)Over/(Under Western Amer. Bank One U.S. Treas. $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 Nat'l Bank 10/18/94 Bank One Federal Home FHLMC $0 $100,000 $21,113 $78,887 Loan Bank- $ Mkt $0 Dallas DDA $21,113 Landmark Bank Texas Indep Agency $900,000 $972,779 $514,698 $458,081 Bank-Dallas 10/02/01 Payroll $30,960 01/13/97 Operating $483,738 Prepared by V. BROKER SELECTION PROCESS This section of the report is to provide a brief explanation of the process undertaken to select the brokers with which the City invests. The broker/dealer list is reviewed annually and any changes are made during this time unless it becomes necessary to make revisions prior to the annual process. The process is outlined below: 1. Brokers express an interest in doing business with the City's investment portfolio 2. A questionnaire is sent to the broker which requests the necessary information for Cash Management to review including references, capital adequacy ratios, etc. 3. The Cash Manager reviews all received questionnaires, summarizes the information and recommends the desired list of brokers with explanatory notes. 4. The recommendation is presented to the Investment Committee at the next quarterly meeting for discussion and final approval. 5. All brokers are notified after the selection is complete. VI. SUMMARY The primary objectives of compliance, safety, liquidity and yield have been achieved for the reporting period as evidenced by this report. These objectives will continue to be pursued for the city of Euless as provided by the investment policy. This has been a very interesting year as the Fed has taken action to prevent inflation. Thus creating a very challenging (although successful) environment for the investment program. The City of Euless, like all other local governments, is faced with the challenge of meeting benchmark levels triggered by the Fed's actions. Therefore, the City's investment program will continue to seek new techniques, instruments, etc. to enhance the return on the City's funds as well as the return of all City funds. The investment committee met on December 7, 1994 and reviewed the presented data for tra mittal toity Council. Diana G. Ortiz, Cash & Debt Manager • 1 �1 Minutes - 10/5/94 Investment Committee Meeting The Committee met to review the investment program for the third quarter. An overview of all investment activity was presented by Diana Ortiz. In addition, there was a discussion of several investment proposals, two of which were follow-ups to previously discussed items. It was recommended to add Rauscher Pierce to the list of brokers, LOGIC investment pool as an overnight investment alternative for the City's operating funds, FGIC money market fund for the Half-Penny Sales tax bond fund proceeds for the monies needed in the first year, FY95, and an investment program by Prudential for the Half-Penny Sales Tax Bond fund proceeds for the balance of monies (not needed in the first year). It was also agreed upon to deny a "Forward Supply Contract" proposal which does not meet the City's needs. It was moved by Joe Hennig to approve the recommendation as presented and seconded by Debra Forte'. Jim Hickerson stated that approximately $5,000 in outstanding checks were written off and that cash balances at the bank could be reduced by that amount. Joe Hennig requested that a portfolio summary be included in future quarterly reports, and, that the broker review process be included in this year's annual report to Council. The meeting was adjourned. APPENDIX c City of&less Sdhec le of Purdhesas Fa July,1994 Investment Type Institution CD Cart.of Dep. FNMA Fed.Nall Mart.Asso. FHLB Fed.Home Loan Baric MERRILL Merrill Lynch BK ONE Baric One MMS&W Masterson Moreland TBILL Treasury BO FFCB Fed.Farm Credit Baric FHLMC Fed.Home Loan Mort. PRUD Prudential Securices WAN Western Amer.Nall LM Landmark Baric REPO Repurchase Agreement TNOTE Treasury Note SHEAR Shearson Lehman LGIF Local Govt Ina Fund SWSEC Southwest Seances Cost Accrued Total P+I Inv. Ira.I . Purchase Term Maturity Rice Par Book Value Interest Total Yield To Capon Interest Seller Maty Net of Total Cost Type Number Date On days) Date Per$100 Value (Pnn.Orly) @ maty Prin+Irt Maturity Rate Rrchased Inst. Discount Premium Fund Prem&Int Pur. of Investment FFCB 313318AZ0 072194 376 08/01/95 99.9688 500,000.00 499,843.75 27,994.79 527,838.54 5.40% 5.38% Prudential 156.25 50 527,994.79 499,843.75 FFCB 313318AZ0 072194 376 0810195 99.9688 500,000.00 499,843.75 27,994.79 527,838.54 5.40% 5,38% Prudential 156.25 2 527,994.79 499,843.75 PILP 072694 1000000 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 4.04% Pruderti al 2 500,000.00 500,000.00 FFCB 313390ry4 072894 365 072895 99.9688 500,000.00 499,843.75 27,550.00 527,393.75 5.54% 5.51% Masterson 156.25 1 527,550.00 499,843.75 Totals. 2,000,000.00 1,999,531.25 83,539.58 2,083,070.83 468.75 2,083,539.58 1,999,531.25 Schedule of Investments Sold For JUy,1994 Cost Accrued Total P+I Ira, Inv.I . Purchase Term Sell Rice Par Book Value Interest Total Yield To Capon Interest Seller Maty Net of Total Cost Type Number Date (in days) Date Per$100 Value (Pnn.Orly) maty Prin+Irt Maturity Rate Purchased Inst, Discount Premurn Fund Prem&Int Pur. of Imestmert FNMA 313589h63 062994 072194 99.1406 500,000.00 495,702.78 4,297.22 500,000.00 4.52% Pruderti al 50 500,000.00 495,702.78 FNMA 313589r21 05/1794 072294 98.2979 500,000.00 491,489.58 8,510.42 500,000.00 4.90% Prudent/al 1 500,000.00 491,489.58 Tota0s: 1,000,000.00 987,192.36 12,807.64 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 987,192.36 City of Euless Schedule of Madrities For JUy,1994 Investment Type Institution CD Cert.of Dep. FNMA Fed.Nall Mart.Asso. FHLB Fed Home Loan Bark MERRILL Merrill Lynch BK ONE Bank One DEAN Dean Witter TBILL Treasuny BII FFCB Fed.Farm Credit Bark FHLMC Fed,Home Loan Mort. PRUD Prudential Securities WAN WesternAmer.Nall LM Landmark Baric REPO Repurchase Agreement TNOTE Treasuy Note SHEAR Shearson Lehman LGIF Local Govt Ina Ford LISRTY Liberty Capital Cost Accrued Total P+I Ina, Irv.I . Rrchase Term Maturity Price Par Book Value Interest Total Prin.+ Yield To Capon Interest Seller Maty Net of Total Cost Type Number Date (in days) Dale Per5100 Value (Rin.Criy) maty It.@ Maty Maturity Rate Purchased Inst. Dscout Premum Fund Prem&Int Pur. of Investment PILP 07/1494 1000000 300,000.00 300,000.00 0.00 300,000.00 3.88% Prudential 2 300,000.00 300,000.00 FNMA 313589ZM8 12/0293 216 07/1894 98.0140 600,000.00 588,084.00 11,916.00 600,000.00 3.41% MERRILL 2,29 600,000.00 588,084.00 PILP 072194 1000000 300,000.00 300,000.00 0.00 300,000.00 4.13% Prudential 1,21 300,000.00 300,000.00 PILP 072894 100.0000 400,000.00 400,000.00 0.00 400,000.00 4.12% PruderYi al 8,12,40 400,000.00 400,000.00 FNMA 313589zw6 02/0294 175 072794 98.4542 500.000.00 492,270.83 7,729.17 500,000.00 3.27% MERRILL 1 500,000.00 492,270.83 TOTAL. 2,100,000.00 2.080,354.83 19,645.17 2,100,000,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,100,000.00 2,080,354.83 City of EUess Schedde of Pcrchases For Atgst,1994 Investment Type Inti don CD Cerb.of Dep. FNMA Fed.Nall Mort.Asso. FHLB Fed.Home Loan Baric MERRILL Merrill Lynch BK ONE Bark One MMS&W Masterson Moreland TBILL Treasuy SO FFCB Fed.Farm Credit Baric FHLMC Fed.Home Loan Mort. PRUD Pudertial Seanties WAN Western Amer.Nall LM Landmark Baric REPO Reperchase Ageemert TNOTE Treasuy Note SHEAR Shearson Lehman LGIF Local Govt Iry FW SWSEC SoWrwest Seatlbes cost Accrued Total P+I @ Irv. Irw I.D. Prdlase Term Maty Pnce Par Book Value Interest Total Yield To Cocpon Interest Seller Maty Net of Total Cost Type Number Date (n days) Dale Per$100 Value (Pin.Orly) @ maty Prin+IN Mattlity Rate Pvchased Isl. Discovt PremiLrn Fend Prem&Irt Ptr. of Investment PILP 08/02/94 100.0000 600,000.00 600,000.00 0.00 600,000.00 4.16% Prudertiel 2,4,24,29 600,000.00 600,000.00 PILP 08105/94 100.0000 700,000.00 700,000.00 0.00 700,000.00 4.08% Prudertial 9 700,000.00 700,000.00 FNMA 313589x39 08/05/94 116 1129A94 98.5339 500,000.00 492,669.44 7,330.56 500,000.00 4.68% Southwest Van ous 500,000.00 492,669.44 REPO 08108194 100.0000 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 4.13% Landmark 2,9 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 PILP 08/10/94 100.0000 400,000.00 400,000.00 0.00 400,000.00 4.05% Pudertial 4,12,40 400,000.00 400,000.00 REPO 0826194 100.0000 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 4.30% Landmark 1 500,000.00 500,000.00 PILP 0829/94 100.0000 1,000.000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 4.24% Prudertlal 2,9 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 Totals: 4,700,000.00 4,692,669.44 7,330.56 4,700,000.00 4,700,000.00 4,692,669.44 { City of Wass Schede of Makrltles For Auyat,1994 ' Investment Type Insbtitian CD Cerci.of Dep. FNMA Fed.Nall Mort.Asso, FHLB Fed,Horne Loan Bank MERRILL Merrill Lynch BK ONE Banc Oro DEAN Dean Witter TBILL Treasuy BIII FFCB Fed Famr Credt Baric FHLMC Fed.Home Loan Mort. PRUD Pnderlial Se"fies WAN Western Amer,Nall LM Landmark Bank REPO Reperchase Agreement TNOTE Treasuy Note SHEAR Shearson Lehman LGIF Local Gov't Iry Fuid LIBRTY Liberty Capital Cost Accrued Total P+I @ Irv. Irv,I.D. Pcrchase Term Mahxty Price Par Book Value Interest Total Prin.+ Yield To Cotpon Interest Seller Maty Net of Total Cost Type Nu,mer Date (in days) Date Per 9100 Value (Prin.Only) @ maty Irl.@ Maty Maty Rate Pcrchased Inst. Discocrt Premlun FVid Prem&Int Pcr, of Investment PILP 08/0854 100.0000 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 4.05% Pnderti al 2,9 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 FFCB 3133115x7 0810253 365 08/0154 100.0000 500,000.00 500,000.00 9,100.00 509,100.00 3.64% 3.64% MERRILL 2,4,39,17 509,100.00 500,000.00 FNMA 313589x78 05/0254 92 08/0554 98.9207 1,000,000.00 989,206.94 10,793.06 1,000,000.00 4.19% Pnrderti at Various 1,000,000.00 989,206.94 FNMA 313589b36 05/0454 97 08/0954 98.8683 500,000.00 494,341.67 5,658.34 500,000.00 4.31% Prtdential 4,9,40 500,000,00 494,341.67 PILP 0823/94 100.0000 200,000.00 200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 4.25% Pnderti al 2 200,000.00 200,000.00 REPO 082954 100.0000 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 836.11 1,000.836.11 4.25% Landmark 2,9 1,000,836.11 1,000,000.00 FHLB 313389cz9 022653 546 082654 100.0000 500,000.00 500,000.00 9,725.00 509,725.00 3.89% 3.89% Shearson 1 509,725.00 500.000.00y� TOTAL 4,700,000.00 4,683,548.61 36,112.50 4,719,661.11 0.00 0.00 4,719,661.11 4,683,548.61 `� City of Edess Schedle of Maturitles For September,1994 Investment Type IrstlhLon CD Cert.of Dep. FNMA Fed.Nall Mat.Asso. FHLB Fed.Home Loan Baric RAUSCHER Rausdxr Place BK ONE Bark One MMS&W Masterson Moreland TRILL Treasury BY FFCB Fed.Fane Credit Bak FHLMC Fed.Home Loan MM. PRUD Prudertial Semritles WAN Western Amer.Nall LM Landmark Bark REPO Reprdrase Ageemat TNOTE Treasury Note FGIC Fill Gueany Ire Co. PILP Prud Inv Uqy PtIYo SWSEC SoLtl est Seantles Cost Accrued Total P+I Irrv. M.I . Pt chase Term Matuity Price Par Book Value lrtaest Total Prin.+ ',laid To Coupon Invest Salla Maty Net of Total Cost Type Nulla Date (in days) Date Per$100 Value (Prin.Orty) @ maty hl.a Maty Maturity Rate Purchased list. Diseprt Premlun Fund Prem s et Pr. Of Investment PILP 09/0254 100.0000 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 4.31% Pnderti at 2 500,000.00 500,000.00 PILP 09MS4 100.0000 200,000.00 200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 4.32% Pruderti at 2,9 200,000.00 200,000.00 PILP 09/1854 100.0000 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 4.48% Ptudenli at 9 500,000.00 500,000.00 REPO 09/1454 7 09/1154 100.0000 8,500,000.00 8,500,000.00 7,272.22 8,507,272.22 4.40% Ladmark 50 8,507,272.22 8,500,000.00 REPO 092154 7 09/2854 100.0000 8,500,000.00 8,500,000.00 7,437.50 8,507,437.50 4.50% Landmark 50 8507,437.50 8,500.000.00 REPO 082654 7 09/0254 100.0000 500000.00 500,000.00 432.64 500,432.64 4.45% Ladmark 1 500,432.64 500,000.00 FNMA 313589849 06/1754 94 09/1754 98.8589 500,000.00 494,294.72 5,705,28 500,000.00 4.48% RuderEal 50 500,000.00 494,294.72 FNMA 313589h48 02/0254 237 092754 97.8604 500,000.00 489,302.08 10,697.93 500,000.00 3.35% MERRILL 1 500,000.00 489,302.08 FNMA 313589872 10/1853 339 092254 96.9584 455,000.00 441,160.80 13,839.20 455,000.00 3.35% MERRILL 2 455,000.00 441,160.80 FNMA 313589872 12/0253 294 092254 97.2070 400,000.00 388,828.00 11,172.00 400,000.00 3.54% MERRILL 1,17 400,000.00 388,828.00 FNMA 313589980 01/1154 255 092354 97.6838 500,000.00 488,418.75 11,581.25 500,000.00 3.38% MERRILL 1,4,9 500,000.00 488,418.75 TOTAL. 21,055,000.00 21,002,004.35 68,138.01 21,070,142.36 0.00 0.00 21,070,142.36 21,002,004.35 OW 00 City of Euless Sdnedrie of Pirchases For September,1994 Mestmat Type IrstbAon CO Ceti.of Dep. FNMA Fed.Neil Mort.Asso. FHLB Fed.Home Loan Baric RAUSCHER Rauscher Pierce BK ONE Bane One MMS&W Masterson Morel" TBILL Treasey 84 FFCB Fed.Farm Credit Baric FHLMC Fed.Home Loan Mort. PRUD Pnderbal Semites WAN Western Amer.Nati LM Landmark Baric REPO Repurchase Agreement TNOTE Treasury Note FGIC AM Guaranty Ins Co. PILP Rvd Irw Uqy PtNo SWSEC Sm trwest Se"lies Cost Accred Total P-I Q Inv, Ctep Purchase Term MahAty Price Per Book Value Interest Total yield To Cm4. Irterest Seller Maly Net of Total Cost Type Nhrnber Dale (in days) Date per$100 Value (Prin.Orly) maty Prin+" McWtty Rete Pirchased Inst. DSCOIrt Premien Find Prem&Irl Pcrof kwestnwt REPO 09/1454 7 092154 100.0000 8,500,000.00 8,500,000.00 7,272.22 8,507,272.22 4.40% Landmark 50 8,507,272.22 8,500,000.00 PILP 09/2054 100.0000 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 4.40% Prtdenh at 9 500,000.00 500,000.00 REPO 092154 7 092654 100.0000 8,500,000.00 8,500,000.00 7,437.50 8,507,437.50 4.50% Landmark 50 8,507,437.50 8,500,000.00 PILP 092254 100.0000 855,000.00 855,000.00 0.00 855,000.00 4.50% Pndertlal 2,9 655,000.00 855,000.00 FNMA 31358"2 092754 93 12/2954 98.7032 525,000.00 518,191.63 6,808.37 525,000.00 5.16% Pndertiat 2 525,000.00 518,191.63 PILP 092754 100.0000 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 4.44% Pndert at 9 500,000.00 500,000.00 REPO 092854 7 10/0554 100.0000 8,500,000.00 8,500,000.00 7,354.86 8,507,354.86 4.45% Landmark 50 8,507,354.66 8.500,000.00 /�, FFMC 313397u74 0928/94 90 122754 98.7450 500,000.00 493,725.00 6,275.00 500000.00 5.15% SoLmmest 9 500,000.00 493,725.00 1 FHLB 31339011 09A2/94 1800 0&0259 100.0000 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 388,000.00 1,388,000.00 7.05% 7.76% Southwest 18,19 1,388,000.00 1,000,000.00 Totals. 29,380,000.00 29,366,916.63 423,147.96 29,790,064.58 29,790,064.58 29,366,916.63 INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEETING October 5, 1994 • Third Quarter Review, FY94 Portfolio Summary Collateral Review Interest Income Projection Discuss Investment Proposals Follow-up to Rauscher Pierce Follow-up to LOGIC FGIC Public Trust Prudential Securities Rauscher Pierce Forward Supply Contract" • Interest Rate Environment & Outlook • Investment Articles Regarding Losses • General Discussion or Questions PORTFOLIO SUMMARY The City's investment portfolio at the end of the third quarter, June 30, 1994, is summarized by instrument and by maturity as shown below. Distribution by Instrument Instrument Type % of Portfolio Average Yield C.D.s: .6% 3.30% Agencies: 74.8 3.94 Treasuries: 16.2 4.35 REPO: 0.0 N/A PILP: 8.4 3.88 100.0% Usually, agencies represent higher earning investments than treasuries; however, this table shows that treasuries are earning a higher average yield. That is because the City "locked into" a long-term (5 year) Treasury Note which accordingly carries a higher interest rate, 5.50%. Distribution by Maturity # of Days Cost % of Portfolio 1- 30 $ 2,385,588 15.2 31- 90 5,279,841 33.7 91- 180 5,052,327 32.3 181- 365 1 ,482,422 9.5 *Over 365 1,449,376 9.3 Total $15,649,554 100.0% This information depicts the degree of liquidity in the City's portfolio with the ability to access 15% of the portfolio within 30 days of which 8% is accessible daily. The average monthly liquidity equates to approximately $1 ,200,000 which suffices our average monthly needs along with daily deposits. Over half of the portfolio matures within six months. This position allows us to reinvest at the projected rising market rates as analysts project the Fed to tighten at least once more this year with Chairman Greenspan pursuing the containment of inflation. By Instrument By Maturity PILP Over 365 days 181-365 days 9% 10% Treasuries 1% 1-30 days 16% 15% \� 91-180 days Agencies 75% 31-90 days 34% June, 1994 June, 1994 2 Cash Management Activity Average 90 day Average City Basis Point , T-Bill Yield Portfolio Yield Difference April 3.60% 3.75% 15 May 4.24 3.90 (34) June 4.33 3.98 (35) The chart shows how the Fed has taken a proactive approach to the fear of inflation--dramatic increases in market rates, 75 basis points in this quarter alone! The Fed has increased the Fed funds rate a total of 125 basis points so far this year! That type of rapid action makes it extremely difficult to keep a portfolio that exceeds a constantly rising benchmark, we are not alone as other cities are obviously facing this dilemma. % Invested Invested Balance April 101% $ 15,702,964.61 May 102 15,847,746.96 June 103 15.649.554.30 Average 102% $ 15,733,421.95 However, the City pursues maximum interest income revenues through active cash management activities including: - cashflow forecasting to meet estimated disbursements, - planning to identify available funds and time them with market rate movements, - maximizing investments with safe but competitive securities, - maximum use of available cash at the bank, - immediately depositing City cash. The chart below represents the use of City funds through cash management, specifically, invested funds as a percent of cash and investments. City Invested Funds As % Peroent 110% t. 90% 70% 6016 .� JF�MUJABO DJFMWJASC DJFAMUJASC DJFMIW JA8CNQJFWV"JA8CWJFhMUJA8 B81 8B Bo 1 61 1 82 1 09 1 04 Fiscal Years 3 COLLATERAL REVIEW The first and most important objective of investing public funds is safety. One way to insure the City's assets is to have them fully secured with "collateral" . Acceptable collateral is defined in the City's investment policy, but generally consists of types of securities the City is allowed to purchase. Bank balances are monitored daily to assure their full coverage. The amount of collateral required by the bank varies with the expected level of deposits (typically correlates with property tax receipts and large franchise tax receipts. City of Euless Collateral Analysis for Cash & C.D. Investments as of 06/30/94 Pledging Safekeeping Pledged Sec. Security Market Value Inv.Value Difference Institution Location Description Par Value (w/FDIC-Ins.) @ MatyP&l) Over/jUnder) Western Amer. Bank One U.S. Treas. $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 :Nat'l Bank 10/18/94 Bank One Federal Home FHLMC $0 $100,000 $21,113 $78,887 1 Loan Bank- $ Mkt $0 Dallas DDA $21,113 Landmark Bank Texas Indep Agency $1,000,000 $1,054,530 $420,601 $633,929 Bank-Dallas 05/13/98 Payroll $39,390 03/23/99 Operating $381,211 I � i Prepared by: A C_ 4 INTEREST INCOME FY92-93 Budget $ 446,558 FY93-94 Budget $ 523,981 FY91-92 Actual 474,727 FY93-94 Y-T-D 333,079 FY93-94 Projected 574,045 (110%) The FY93-94 projected interest income amount is comprised of interest income received year-to-date, coupon payments and interest to be received on existing investments, interest that will accrue through the end of the fiscal year but not received until afterwards, less interest accrued for prior year. Interest continues to be earned and distributed to the various funds which are able to invest, the newest of which is the Half Penny Sales Tax Fund. ..... . Iknt���5t Ircatne By F>f�ntl „ �ls flf f:f4 Fund FY93 FY93 FY94 FY94 Cpns & Proj Proj Less PY # Budget Audit Budget YTD Exist Inv Accrual Reinv Accrual Total Diff 1 (2 1 $154,000 $152,815 $220,000 $121,180 $71,564 $55,207 $10,438 $41,969 $216,420 $3,580 2 111,150 126,375 170,000 88,764 39,441 56,241 10,935 23,461 $171,920 $1,920 4 100,002 22,628 30,000 9,848 7,487 1,512 1,203 $17,644 ($_1_2,356' 8 5,000 12,000 10,000 6,484 1,079 5,884 717 2,129 $12,035 $2)03,r- 9 2)03`. 9 24,587 20,011 7,694 239 4,169 $23,774 $23,774- 12 23,77412 1,100 3,969 4,000 2,502 0 1,905 770 197 $4,979 $979 17 5,000 2,435 5,000 7,273 6,752 1,197 1,414 2,356 $14,279 $9,279 18 0 $0 $0 20 236 0 $0 $0 21 7,000 4,453 5,000 5,028 3,810 3 1,650 $7,190 $2,190 24 652 795 237 $1,032 $1,032 26 10,000 10,092 10,000 4,929 2,159 3,810 708 651 $10,954 $954 27 $0 $0 29 16,952 12,000 4,482 3,644 2,522 945 922 $10,671 $1,329 30 43,306 44,994 47,981 41,132 6,849 $47,981 $0 39 10,000 40,954 10,000 16,475 2,730 0 4,788 $14,417 $4,417 40 4,234 4,178 2,320 1,033 $7,531 $7,531 50 0 0 0 0 11,417 5,794 $17,211 $17,211 90 41,598 3993 ($3,993 ($3,993 $446,558 508,975 523,981 333,079 163,135 130,575 34,744 87,488 574,045 50,064 1.) Projected Accrual = based on currently held investments that mature after FY94. 2). Projected reinvestments = Net cash flow assumed invested in PILP at gradually rising market rates. 3.) Total projected Interest Income represents a conservative amount. Depending on on the fluctuation of the market, this amount could rise. . 5 Investment Proposals Summary • Financial Guaranty Insurance Company U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund • Rauscher Pierce Refsnes - additional broker, previously reviewed • LOGIC (investment pool) comparative rates & client list attached previously reviewed 4L • Prudential Investment Management Program to manage sales tax bond proceeds • Rauscher Pierce Refsnes Forward Supply Contract-instrument used to invest sales tax bond proceeds to meet debt service requirements. • Background Information Current list of brokers/dealers: Prudential Securities Merrill Lynch Southwest Securities Masterson, Moreland • Overnight instruments: Prudential Institutional Liquidity Portfolio Repurchase Agreement - 7-day i 6 Rauscher Pierce Ref snes Follow - Up • Sue Ann Breckenridge has an excellent reputation in the investment industry • Rauscher Pierce Refsnes is one of the better regional firms in the industry • Sue Ann has increased her customer base since our last review of brokers and dealers • Her references include the following: City of Garland - Very competitive, very responsive (quick), very aggressive on agencies (good prices on bids/quotes) City of Hurst - Very good (competitive), frequently utilize her services, excellent! City of San Antonio - competitive and timely rate quotes, great source of general infor- mation, considered one of the City's top broker on their list. i . 7 LOGIC "Liquid Asset Portfolio" Follow-Up Texas Local Government Investment Cooperative • (LOGIC) is the investment pool administered by Trust Co. of Texas which has been previously reviewed. • Client list is attached. • Yields are very competitive. See rate history sheet. Higher income provided through active investment management style/strategy--referred to as incremental income. • Recap of characteristics: - Primary goal is to fulfill specific safety and liquidity objectives. - Portfolio of U.S. Treasuries or its agencies, fully r.. collateralized repurchase agreements having a defined termination date & secured by same obligations. - Maintains $1 net asset value per share - Daily liquidity, 180-day (or less) weighted average maturity. - Management & operation fee is at less than 20 basis points. - 5 member Board of Directors made up from city, county, school district and other government officials in public finance. - 24 member advisory board maintains goal and verifies status. Comparison of Interest Rates for Various Investment Funds 5 4.9 4.8 4.7 4.6 ' 4.5 — - N � 4.4 4.3 Ej 4.1 El 4 - - E 3.9 0 0 i 3.8 3.7 Jul 1 Jul 15 Jul 22 Jul 29 Aug 5 Aug 12 Aug 19 Aug 26 Sep 2 Sep 10 Sep 16 p PILP p LOGIC * TXPOOL * 3 mo.TBILL o FGIC 9 LOGIC Client Summary 9/16/94 Entity Contact Phone/Fax Arlington I.S.D. Phil Roberson 817-459-7330 Bexar Metro Water District Julia M. Miller 210-922-9941 Burnet County Katy Gilmore 210-756-5497 City of Carrollton Erin Hagey 214-466-3110 City of Cleburne Greg Wilmore 817-645-0911 City of Huntsville Patricia Allen 409-291-5440 City of Midland Roily Hughes 915-685-7211 City of Wichita Falls Fred Werner 817-761-7462 Clay County Sue Brock 817-538-5911 Crosby I.S.D. Ronald M. Wilson 713-328-9202 Fort Bend County Kathy Hynson 713-341-3750 Fort Worth I.S.D. Chris Moad 817-871-2173 Hood County Reva Hendrix 817-579-3209 N. Central Tx. Cnc'I of Gov't Troy Elliott 817-695-9123 Northeast I.S.D. Thomas O' Daniel 210-804-7118 Town of Higland Park Bill Pollock 214-521-4161 10 OVERNIGHT INVESTMENT ALTERNATIVES -5/25/94 PURPOSE To analyze different options for overnight investments as allowed in the City's investment policy while seeking to maximize yield. BACKGROUND Since the Local Government Institutional Fund for Texas ceased operations on April 29, 1994, the portion of City funds invested in that pool have been invested in Repurchase Agreements via the depository bank. This investment vehicle is a 7-day investment which meets all of the City's investment policy parameters. However, the cash management program utilizes investment vehicles which provide overnight liquidity; thus this review of various funds. Several excellent investment vehicles were considered (shown in detail on the following pages); therefore, the City's funds will be safely invested whichever fund is chosen. OPTIONS Texpool Currently undergoing much political change and redirection by Martha Whitehead, State Treasurer. Investment Manager left along with some staff and created awn private money market pool. This investment manager was the "backbone" of this pool. (See Trust Company of Texas) Merrill Lynch CChange in contact person. Not as service oriented. Fidelity High management fees, high balance requirements. Trust Company of Texas Newest fund in Texas, recently created through a partnership of Linda Patterson and Company and Southwest Securities. Linda Patterson is former Investment Manager of State of Texas' TexPool. Very competent, highly respected in this field of government. Prudential al High service oriented. Receive same day credit for funds received for investment. RECOMMENDATION All funds/pools serve the City's purpose: overnight investment which provide safety, liquidity and competitive rates of return. Almost every feature of each fund is identical and meet the City's investment policy guidelines. However, in consideration of the points outlined in the "Options" section, it is recommended that the City continue use of the current 7-day Repurchase Agreement; select Prudential Institutional Liquidity Portfolio and continue to monitor Trust Company of Texas as it grows for future consideration. . 11 Investment Proposal by Financial Guaranty Insurance Company (FGIC) • Consider utilization of a FGIC product: U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund • Charateristics/Benefits: - Portfolio of 100% direct U.S. government obligations - Daily liquidity (90 day weighted average maturity) - late day investment services, purchases by 3:00 p.m. and/ or redemptions by 12:30 p.m. - meets or exceeds regulatory guidelines of many states (regulated by rating agencies) - no sales charge or fees (50 basis points admin. fee) - AAAm rating by SSCP and Aaa by Moody's (highest quality) - $100,000 minimum initial investment - $1.00 Net Asset Value per share - includes arbitrage calculations of invested funds • Note: Compares to or is very similar to an investment vehicle currently in the City's portfolio, PILP. • Clients: City of Hartford, Conn. City of Bridgeport, Conn. City of Cromwell Florida Housing Authority Wisconsin Housing Authority other individuals (no Texas clients as of 10/3/94) 12 Investment Management Proposal by Prudential Securities • Proposal to manage approximately $8,000,000 bond proceeds from Sales Tax Revenue Bond Sale • Cost: relative to amount managed. • Benefits: - daily management of bond proceeds within our specified investment guidelines - provide calculations necessary to monitor compliance with federal arbitrage regulations at no additional cost - additional income earned through the dedicated professional management that supplements City staff - take co-fiduciary responsibility, so if an investment policy is violated, they would take on any related costs - investments through delivery vs. payment to bank of our choice so the City takes possession of securities - quarterly status reports - annual arbitrage status reports - option of discontinuing service if not satisfied - City maintains control (decision-making aspect) prior to investment purchases • Disadvantages: - n/a • Requirements - Drawdown schedule for investment terms - Approval by Investment committee 13 4P Investment Proposal by RPR `Forward Supply Contract " • Must take bids from at least 3 vendors. • Process: City enters into a contract with a financial institution. Contract is for the City to receive a guaranteed rate of return on debt fund which calculates into present value dollars based on a "forward yield curve", a projected curve. • This guaranteed rate is provided in the form of an up-front, lump sum payment. • The vendor assures delivery of Treasury obligations to City to meet debt service needs on or before due date. • In return, the City agrees to give up the right to the yields actually earned on the delivered Treasury obligations for the debt service fund. • Disadvantages: City loses access to debt service funds as they are locked into a contractual agreement. • In this rising interest rate market, the city will probably lose interest earnings as the contract locks a guaranteed rate. • If the bond funds are refunded and the City does not transfer the contract, the contract is cancelled by reimbursing the provider for the present value of future earnings on the remaining balance in the debt service fund plus any cost to the provider for breaking the investment. 14 Investment Recommendation ✓ Need to diversify available institutions due to the addition of bond proceeds. Portfolio increased from $12 to $20 million or 67%. ,/ Add RPR to broker/dealer list. Contact person has extensive experience & is very competent in public investments. ,/ Delete Merrill Lynch from the broker/dealer list. Contact person has changed and the new person does not have any public investment references nor has he been effective since the change. ,/ Add LOGIC investment pool. Safely enhances the overnight investment options with greater yields. ,/ Decline RPR "Forward Supply Contract". Locks the City into a contract decreasing the City's flexibility, and, not a prudent option in a rising interest rate market. ,/ Utilize Prudential Investment Management Program on a trial basis for bond proceeds not required in the first CIP year. Enhances yield as the portfolio is actively managed while the City maintains control over all investment decisions. It is also a flexible program in the cash flow drawdown requirements. Also provides arbitrage calculations included in their fee. ,/ Add FGIC money market fund. Has greater flexibility with trade deadlines. Utilizing FGIC ajr bona pfcceeds for short term projects. Also provides arbitrage calculations included in their fee. 15 • Economic Environment and Interest Rate Outlook • The Fed tightened policy again this year twice for a total of 75 basis points. • They also increased the discount rate by 50 basis points to 3.5%, the first time in five years that it had been raised. • The Fed's action totals 125 basis points for the year! • This rate is projected to rise to 4.5% in this year. • Inflation remains low and the rate is likely to remain around 3% for all of 1994. • Growth is projected to be at 3% by year end and under 3% in 1995. • Market rate expectations include 8% level for the prime rate and 5% for the Fed Funds rate by year end. INVESTMENT ARTICLES REGARDING LOSSES J i.r• v v •- /�rv./arc` KB 0016426-7 9529 C01 M`MUNIGIPALSETREASURES ASSOC 1-:1229 19TH STREET NW !;WASHINGTON DC 20036-2413 Ht"brand fax transmittal memo 7671 nor pages i, From / co. ' 0 f f „ New York,N.Y. Phone n,7 fax a. 7 Lawsuit sof Spending initiative Seeks to Regain / Funds I nve-sued onel heard arguments on whether the case 7z"-. 1 should first be heard at the trial court In Derivatives e_7 c- level and then work its way through ;ar appeals to the high court, By Lynn Stevens Hume F The justices indicated they would not issue an opinion on that procedur- WASHINGTON—Charles CountyA - Id al issue undI after.they hear oral argu- Md,, is trying to recover millions of d ments covering substantive issues re- dollars from nine securities firms that s- lated to the initiative's constitutionali- sold the county's former deputy trea- ty. surer derivatives and other riiky long- Legal wrangling over Initiative 601 term investments that were prohibited began in February,when a lawsuit was under a state-enacted.local law. filed with the high court on behalf of The county sued the firrns in a U.S. several citizens and two legislators. District Court earlier tlus month to re- That suit asked the court to block cover almost$30 million---its entire It enforcement of the initiative, and the portfolio—that had been invested in o Suit also requested that the initiative taxable inverse floaters,collateralized is be declared unconstitutional because mortgage obligations, and other nledi- it "infringes on the sovereign taxing um- and long-term derivatives and S and appropriation power of the legis- structured notes. Plcosc turn to WASHINGTON page 5 Five of the Timis have since agreed , to settle the dispute by repaying the county about $10 million to S15 mil- e to Terms on Bill lion in exchange for the derivatives j and structured notes, Howard Gold- olving Water Funds berg, the county's lawyer, said yester- day. Goldberg, a partner with the law ?! Icon would go td"help finange state firm of Smith, Somerville & Case in wastewater treatment plants and$700 Baltimore, would not name the firms r. million would go to a proposed re- involved in the settlements, = volving fund for drinking water facil- Three other firms, lie said, have ities. agreed to allow the county's financial i A final vote on the spending bill is consultant, A. Webster Dougherty & ^ ! not expected in the-House and the Sen- Co. in Baltimore, to sell the obliga- f ate until after Labor Day because the tions they sold the county, with the t ` conference rgport is not expected to be county getting the proceeds but re- printed until Sept. 2, a House staff twining its right to litigate over any re- ; member said. maining losses,he said. Meanwhile,Congress is working on Goldberg also declined to identify 1. two separate bills to reauthorize the these firms, but sources said one of ). wastewater and drinking water pro- them is Liberty Capital Markets of grams. Funding for both bills expires at Irvine, Calif., which sold the county t the end of this fiscal year on Sept. 30. almost two-thirds of the risky invest- One bill is a six-year reauthorize- meets in its portfolio. Officials from tion of both federal standards for Liberty Cnpital did not ret—ri hone I: wastewater and the revolving loan calls. �. funds that many states use to stretch Goldberg and county officials hope Please turn to WATER page 4 Please turn to LAWSUIT a e 28 !', Ps PR �t lir 'Finder a so-called public local count~will settle all of the dispu Lawsuit The securities firms named in the law — a local law enacted by the County officials say they do not Continued from front page suit,in addition to Liberty Capital, Maryland General Assembly — know why Johnson, who had an- the settlements will prevent Stan- are Prudential Securities Inc.;Don- Charles County can invest only in nounced he would be a candidate lard and Poor's Corp. from lower- aldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securi- short-term U.S.government oblig- for cc,unty treasurer, invested in ing its AA-minus rating on the ties Corp.; Smith Barney Inc.; ations. Short-term generally means medium- and long-tear derivatives county's outstanding 57b million Lehman Government Securities 270 days or less, county officials and structured notes. of unenhanced general obligation Inc.; Ernst&Co.; Meridian Capital said. Johnson took respoitsibility for bonds. Markets; Mabon Securities Corp_; The derivatives and structured the ecunty's investments and pur- The rating agency placed the and Murchison Investment notes purchased by Johnson were chased these obligation,after Thel- bonds on CreditWatch with "neg- Bankers. not government securities and had ma Bowie,then treasurer,suffered ative implications" last week after The county's troubles began in maturities up to 24 years, Ketter- a series of health problems starting becoming conc.:rwd that the coup- el-iriy July when former deputy tr-ea- man and others said. in 1991. ty would not be able to rrxxt cash- surer Stephen 12 Johnson reported The county filed its lawsuit on Jolt--tson was fired as deputy ttea- tlow needs and debt service re- a $1.3 million loss from the coon- Aug.5 against the nine out-of-state sumer->n July 12,after county offt- Cuirements because its invc-stincnt ty's iavcsuttent portfolio for the fis- securities firms that had Sold these cials ljarned about the investments. portfolio was tied up in derivative~ cal year ending on June 30. obligations to the county through When contacted ear•lie-this week, and structured notes. County auditors and officials be- Johnson. Johnson refused to coninent on the But Goldberg said yesterd:ry that gan investigating and discovered The suit;which was filed in controversy or on his previously the money corning in from the sc t- the Johnson,over an 18-month pe- the U.S. District Court of the announced plans w.run for county demerits should alleviate:the rating riod,had invested the county's en- District of Maryland in Balti- treasurer. agency's concerns. tire investment portfolio in risky more, sought an immediate re- Aslr� whether the county plans "The county's immediate finan- medium- and long-term derivatives turn of the county's money from to laic:any action agai ist Johnson cial problem is over. The money and structured notes. the transactions- over the investment controversy, has already started flowing back The obligations included inverse The county contended in the suit Fink said,"We're continuing to in- into its treasury,"he,said- floaters,two-tiered index notes,and that since the transactions violated vestigsate every possibility in order Meanwhile, the county is plan- collateralized mortgage obligations a state-enacted local law, they to recover the moneJ and eom- ning to amend its lawsuit to it-cov- issued by government-sponsored should be rendered void and the pletely make the county whole_" cr millions of additional dollars in agencies such as the Federal Na- county should be, repaid County sources said this week county funds that lite deputy Ire. [tonal Mortgage Association or the "The county did not have au- that nate attorneys are also inves- surer used for similar past transac- Federal Home Loan Mortgage thority to enter into them," Roger ligating the county in stmenis. tions in which the derivatives and Corp. These instruments are ex- Fink, a county attomey, said this But deputy state attorney Frank - structured notes were either sold or tremely sensitive to changes in in- week-. "Our legal position has been Jones said he could no-confirm or redeemed, Goldberg said. terest rates and produced losses that we don't own them, so all of deny .he existence of any investi- That amount of money could ex- when interest rates rose. the transactions are void." gatiort. ceed the funds being sought in the "They were well beyond what Although the county asked the Bowie formally resigned as current complaint, sources saidwould be a prudent investment for court to take immediate action,sev- county treasurer on Aug. 17 for The county is determined to con- a municipality," said Samuel Ket- eral of the scheduled court hearings heaftlh reasons.County officials im- tinue to"vigorously pursue" legal- terman, a senior vice president at have been postponed,including one mediately appointed Harry H. ly any firms that do not fully repay A. Webster Dougherty. "The coun- set for today, as the county contin- Foxw al to replace her.Foxw•ell m- the county funds that were tied up ty had no liquidity whatsoever"as lies to world�gwarde�t� i�� s;. t_irc 4 from the Navy is July atter in these transactions, said a-result of these investments, he putes with thb secitfitits Miiis" ' 's>rt�Jirg 30 years with the U.S. Of- d. Goldberg said tie is hopeful the free or Naval Intclligeoce. Q yesterday. sal • �5 + T1• GF11'I �l i rT�r t;Hy I UWrI ?,41 v F a Znves ment. crisis siva . mks Odessa College By. 'l ee Hancock''' Millions of dollars tied u source of pride in this rough-edged SL-JtWHsrolThe DdW?lOril!j4 oilfield town. odeaa�i'Colloge was to St�u�ti� 1C can't sell Ching the troubled investments, Like'a gambldr oa a hot streak the college has raised tuition 20 per. When'fiscal.dfficer,Roger Coolner think spine of the things that hap- cent; cut its budget s2 million and invested School' money', faculty pened,probably,dQ all should have dL=antled its ��� and men's me#abera recall'' hits,saying, he ten' track teams.The colle;e district al couldrz't`w=to'iose„•, What b'appenod wns what a jug so hes proposed raising property "cue'Skid, 'very?tstikly, every. nior college nssoclatl'on official razes by 7Z percent thing;i.',�oBched`ttlme ;io gold,'" calls the Norat iave$tment.related College president Phil Speegle, taid^Siia8lsir ' crisis ever-to hit an stili supported by his board, hes r tiirvpaiett of the ' 9 Texas SO bu'afnesiled.MiWs;tC titin: depart• public junior colleges!,; �,yven-UP his $122,9.58 aalnry for a inent,"6'OiL tdugtWd,,6p¢ai"s corm- Odessa ColIe�e ofPlei�ls sav the token payment of�i a;e=r. rents to the)Kaculq�Scriete in lay', crisis, involving exotic securicles "To be real�'hoaest with you, I ',`Then .when the,crash'•comes, called mortgage-backed derivatives, feel'ths college'would be more hurt you. dan'1 believe'!t, sato said. "I has shaken an institutio& lone a• please esaBECXTFJMon Page 14A. 0 ' ll-ege' * 11 sloss' e �tal ions, recuo"rds , indicate' ' y A ODESSA COLLEGE CRISIS Idlend Abilene _ .T I I - ddetaea pn Angelo TEXAS Location: Odessa Sa ' Year founded: 1873,when the 10 AuBti Permian Jum!cr Gc!les9 syctern nae N spiit.into Odessa College and Midland Antonlc 35 College . Enrolltttentit 5,000 0$6,88 million In trading losses since August 1883, 5; puy ■A proposed 7,2 percent tax Increase for the college district,Which InCludeb actor County. ■A 58.24 million bond Issue and a$5,2 million bank loan to finance college debts from the crisis and provide operating expenses for the next two years. ■$2 million in budget Cuts for fiscal 1994-95, Including; men's track Program;tennis team*; faculty travel;22 voluntary early retirements, Including president Phll Speegte;reduction of operating budget=for academic departments;ellminating plannod equipment purchases, L Derivatives are based on,or"derived"from, the value of assets such vi Z as stocks,bonds or•mongeges,Generally,as the risk of any investment Increaade,so does the potoMlal return or po4siblo loss. (;j�� C ,� J The risk involved with the mortgage-backed derivatives bought by Odessa College rides on Intereot rata shift. Mortgage-backed derivatlwi are created when the Federal Koro Loan Mortgage,Corp,and'Fedeml National Mortgage Corp. resell mortgages Is3ued to hundreds vi home buyers.When the two government-Created mortgage firms resell mortgages to Investom, the ICUs are broken apart and sold In plecos--hcmeorvrers'princ!pal and interest ropayments. These pieces—or dedvativec—can varyon the ba3is of when the undertying Individual mortgages maturo and what Interest rate they pay. Each place carries its own degree of risk and what OCessa College bought is among the rlskloet, It interest rates stay low or fall, home owners refinance their loans or buy new homes, paying off their old mortgogos more quickly. When that happens,the derivativae pay high mums and quickly return an investor's prinolpal,(. But when intereat rates rias—as has happened several tlmos since February--homa reeaies•and refinancings fall off.Thero ir.less demand for moR9agos,and their value to Investors declines, When Odessa College faced a major Incronse In interest rates earlier this year, it confronted a triple whammy,The return on its irmvactment evaporated,the value of its cerivativee tell amid diminlshed Investor demand end,t?ecause homeowners kopi'their old mortgagos longer,the school may be unable to recover Ito principal for decades, b�� (M- 3NOW WOScy 31SUW WdWSIHM �3(ld5 CWU70NOW rNOstl1i�i�HW ei"11aT .T r tic AUG 19 '94 11:51-PN CITY OF EAYTOkIN p ?;4 14 A Ci rpalla>f jfl'ornir+p relu,a Friday, August, S, 1994 A Securities investment 'crisis , �as . essa College - in tur'mo i :ontinued from Nee IA,• 14 left than if I atay," he said, HgBV t011 At the time, Dr. Speegle said, :.,,Dr,Speegle said he feels reapon• y ttustees discussed the fact that Able for the crisis,adding, "I thiak The college's Wall Srreet binge ;their investment lneovic might that all of us feel that collectively has taken a heavy,toll across the drop if interest rates shifted,But he and individually we made at er. campus, a sprawl of, nondescript, ;said no one mentioned that such'a Cor." I modem bride biilldiagz in west i ihift would make the securities . pr, Cooifsr,, 48, recently re* 0¢6378, , 'Bard to sell, : signed his job of I: yesra and hes Faculty.travel has been viMU&IIY ' Said board member Jim Gilli• ieclired.an inter viaw, bau�ed,and ase of air:and?tioailag land,vice president of lzvestmenu Some students, faculty and resi- has bees curtailed,Equipment Pur" for the Odessa office of Ddllas-based lents say they remain puzzled over chases have been canceled in many William Rigg&Co.,a real estate and tow the college got into this mess. departments, and summer hours at insurance firm; "I was told I that . "We lust get bits and pieces," the fitness center Were reduced there was no risk," Said track coach Cue McMaster, !rota six days a week to four, AlMO91 It;amediately,Dr.Coomer, who is trying to find his track stars' Twenty-two of the college's 350 the fiscal officer, put the school's scholarship' offers from other employees havi taken early retire• dntire tavestment fund into derive, schools."It's been real,real tough." Ment,and officials say Dr.Coomer'o fives, at times moving millions of What is clear is that Odessa Col, S94,000•a-year job will remain .va.' 4ollars in and out of securities lase has$22 million stuck in invest,, tet• within a few hours,records show. tents that it gams afford to sell -- I The cuts have come when many. 1'Tn the year ending in AU9Uk securities.so volatile that federally students and professors, are Away 1993;for example,the college used a (wuXed bat.%S ery barred from buy for the summer, some faculty raid, moi] mltllon investment pool — ev NOW [ng them.The portfolio include4 all so the impact Is not ?ti1lY under• Q'iit.h ng freta booster club money of:.the college's' investment funds stood, - to tuition and even funds borrowed lad eome of its $75 million aaaual "It basalt suak in," said govern- by Issuing bonds.— to rack up a )perating revenues, college offs• ment professor Bill Rutherford. total of $107 million In derivatives rials said. Oa top of that,the school Pete Anchando,41,a student gov. ' tirades, records indicate. That year, :as lost milliono more in the last erument'officer, said students will .it earned 54 million and,ae in previ- leap from its securities trades. reel the tuition, increase, "but I ous years, put most of the profits Odessa College had to borrow don't think. anybody's aware of i.1. t back into derivatiYev, said ;S:2 million from a local bank to what's going on, I don't think the Virginia Chieum,the school's direc• zzoi June debt payment9 and other for of business systems. . sxpenser,it Is gettiag additional op> college her really dope a good job Those earnings—an average re- iranng honey through a 66,24 mil. exPhdMItg,this at all." turn of 21.1 percent in 1991-92 and ion bond issue, Perhaps most embittered are almost 2S pascent in 1993.94,accord. The problems stem from securl- members of the colleges nationally ing to Ms. Chisum— wowed other fes now consldered so risky and ranked track team, Which took Texas junior ootleges, lolatile that they are known In third in the 1994 junior college na• "Anytime someone is earning some Wall Street circles As "toxic tional Indoor track cbempionehipsr twice, three times the interest veste." "They haven't given, us any ; you're earning,you're certainly en- -"The reason; If you.touch 'em choices.We're all trying to fired an. vious," said Ralph Hall, vice preei- md they blow up on you, you're other school, and• no schools are dent of administratiga at Collin tilled. You're dead. That's why giving out say scholazahipa We ars County Comr0uhiry College. hey're very hard to sell," said right now sort of in a bind," said, "To be frank, anYdme they talk Momas M.Poor,managing director Johnny McDaufel, 20, of Tallahas- about that kind of interest, there is It Scudder,Stevens&Clark,a mute, isle, Fla,, a aatlolully ranked triple a hell of a risk involved, and if �i-futid manager in Boston. "The) ijymper."I really don't think people 'you're smart, you're goiag to back Vere big bete on the direction of luAderctand about the situation.1, off a minute, and say, 'Is this too aterest rates," f Mat happened at Odessa Col• aood to be true?'" said Mr,Hall. Large-scale speculation in deriv,, i1ggs seaters on esoteric mortgage, ]Because of such concerns, only itives has received national atten• fteked derivatives with sautes like, five of the state's 49 other junior Ion this year because of a market ,"support inverae floaters"and'sup• colleges have even dabbled in mort• 4t has left mutual funds,corpora 11port principal-only strips," gage-backed derivatives, their offi- S'cns and other major investors I ; Derivatives are financial corp, cers said.None of the five is in the yith billion-dollar losses. ;tracts based on underlying mets Dallas Fort Worth area, •' Mr,Poor and other experts quer ;ouch as stocks or bonds, In late 1992,Dr.Coomer finished ion how such a large,high-risk in•. Y,Tha. college's derivatives are a doctoral dissertation at Texas 'estment could have been appropri• lbaoed on home mortgagee ltnt Tech University in Lubbock outlin.- te for a S,000-student junior ,t4rough the Federal Home Loan it:� slits Stivrsimeiit �ttnte he Wfl9 allege. ;biortgage Corp.pad Federal Nation. as'ng at Odessa College.l�eluded "They shouldn't have been in !al Mortgaao Cory. Their complex Wyat proved to be a prophetic warn- �ls. It's taut simple," said Jamas 1 :structu"dictates that an investor's ,ing about mortgage-backed derive• lidanek, a Califotztiia-based wort- overall profit moves in the opposite eves; If market C4nditioas soured, aae•backed securide94sset manag• ;d;irectica from interest rates, he wrote, "an investor could be r who reviewed the school's port, When interact rates rise -- as Stuck with a long-term investment elle for The Daises horning News. °alas happentd several ti=ez since that huno cash flow." ft's outrageous.". !February — their return evapo: Perlodic updates Dr.6peegle and some of the bine rates,their price fails and Investors rusteas acknowledge authorizing may not recover,their principal for Odessa College board members he investments about four years decades,' said they got periodic oral updatts go. Sat the prc9ident and trustees Tho "sUpport class" derivative9 on the college's. investments but Bid they did 4ot understand the i purchased by the college are riskier neithor coked for—nor got--writ- ntential risks — even though the !and :all even harder when interest ten monthly reports. ollege's records include a 22-page ;rates shift upward, ,It was something that (Dr. ocument explicitly detailing the1990 was 'key year Coomer) knew well, and no one re, sks of what it called "speculative" ; The college's foray into deriva• guy had any reteoa to doubt tont he :curities. At a broker's request, 'rives bel an in Berl 1 Was capable ot'doltg it, said board cth Dr. Speogle anal Dr. Coomer: g Y 490, when the president Bob Clark, a licensed se. .gDed the doc=ent in Yebruary i board passed a brief resolution au• curities broker.with Dean Witter 3, ihorizing Dr. Coomer and Dr. Reynolds Inc. ,,Hindsight is 10.20:' $peegle to trade such securities. '•c - rT�JH-l;NnW Mn5;?i7I e-,HW �"UWSIHM =,'iH5 (INH7IZ�CW NOSN315U^.J WHrT :TT 7T C)nH �' �a 1 1 -=•Hi I ._I Tr' OF EA'r Dr. Speegle•sald he got sporadic The brokerage firms' profits The first public announce=et:t 'iarormal"recaps from Dr. Coomer from the hundred# of millions of came three days before three trust• adad no idea" that operating dollars in trades is unclear. College ees stood for re-election on hfay,7. it:. were going into the laves;• officials'esy they have no records of evQQ though Mr. Speegle said he Mens. "I simply wasn't Involved," the profits,which are built into the first learned of the investment jtes• he said, rices of the derivatives. At least co oa March 21—three days before In July 1993,Dr.Coomer told the one of the firma earned profits of up the election-filing deadline. board's finonc9 committee.that he to 4 percent—well obove industry Mr. Clark, the board president, was pulling out of derivatives be- standards —.in similar trades with said the problem was made pubhe cause he feared the market was soft- several Ohio counties, according to as soon as possible after the imine. eniag. Mr. Clark said he and other- Roger Cox, a Dayton securities ane• diate financial crista was addressed. committee members agreed, asked lyst who Studied those transactions. Making aometbing-like that public no more questions and did not meet wasn't one of our prlorlties,'-,.;he again until March. Weeks after learning of the di- said. But records show that Dr, Coom• saster, Dr. Speegle called a May 3 . Mr, Martin also noted that,-the er continued buying the securities nowsconference. A statement re- school's planned 7,2 percent tax heavily that fall, leased at the time said notbing rate increase — which would rare By December, Dr. Speegle said, about derivatives but stated that the average Ector County bopa� Dr, Coomer appeared increasingly the college had "cashhow difficul• owner's taxes S733 a year fails stressed and told him that "the ties" due to problems with "very just below the 8 percent threshold bond market is lousy, the market is eerure ... high-yield securities." tent would c1low a tax rollback elec- Just awful," Even so, Dr, Speegle Then and now, Dr. Speegle and tion, said, he asked nothing about the other college officials have charac- "1 think it's a pattern," said college's portfolio, terized their $22 million portfolio's Martin,,who has peppered the:rol• By January, Dr. Coomer was woO)as"paper losses"and said they lege with questions to Iearn• whet avoiding any discussion of invest• eventually will get the money back went wrong, "They seem to be bop- ments that he bad once bragged by holding the securities until they ing they cau stall and not andwcr about, said Jay Box, a physical edu- mature in 2021 or 2023. questions aad eventually write this cation professor who worked with Securities experts say, however, off quietly and have people 14kye Dr, Coomer every Friday from $ep• that tying up money-for decades them alone." tsmber to May as part of an adminis• meads it real loss, "ve internsillp, "This college may well have knew we were doing poorly," bought a loan which returns noth• M , x said, Ing In the way of interest and loses Later, Mr, BoX said, the flseal money to inflation, said Mr, poor, officer acknowledged that "he the securities expert."If they stick, would have trouble going to sleep around, they'll get their money at night and would wonder if thin is back.They just won't have much to going to turn around. He just kept show for it, hoping it would and when it didn't, They also inay have trouble ob• he finally had to go intone Dr, raining new financing,said an Ana. SpQsgle." lyn with.Moody's Investors Service. On March 21, Dr. Speegle said, The bond-rating service recently Dr. Coomer tgld him bow bad the aanounud it is re-evalusiing the situation was. college's current Above-average The portfolio had becolns worth debt rating btcause of the crisis, a,fraction of what the college paid "It's pretty serious," said Moody's for it, Based on recent estimates, it vice president Anita Russell. Some faculty members, .upset at is worth leas than ball of its pur- the events,said they believe college ehase price, and. the value of one officials knew more about the in. holding has dropped 90 perce'nt, , vestmenn than they now aclmowl• Dr.Speegle,seed Dr. Coomer also edge, revealed that he had already sold "If (Dr, Coomer) was gambling, some investments at a loss and had. we feel like thmy knew he was doing borrowed$4 million with securities it," said htr. Box, president of the as collateral to make erlde meet. Faculty Senate, On March 22, said Mr. GLllSland, sox said Dr. Costner felt the trustee, the college had to un pressured by the board's reluctance load 56.25 million iu derivatives at a to raise taxes or tuition. , S2,7 million 16ss to meet Irs payroll. "Vere needed more tnoney'in,cur '7q scary, absolutely," he',said. opersting budget to be able to make sat single day's loss is only part it through. The way to do it was to e 56.58 mlllioa in trading losses put some of the operating budget in the college has had since last Au• these favestaaents," Mr. Box said, gust, recorQs Judicate. ' In April, college officials hired ".We were living beyond Qtr Dallas lawyer.kay Hutchison and a means." battery of other lawyers to sort out Dr. Speegle said he has heaed the .mess and help get short-term that Dr.Coomer felt pressure."Rog, er is a good max, he said. He made flnt:nc.ng to keep the college run• a tni,iaae„ ting. By tnld4une, the college had Some Odessa residents say they more tlwz$105,040 in legal billy are troubled by•the college's has- In the aftermath, Dr, Speegle dung of the crisis, which school said, one lawyer has found no evi• officials say hes exacerbated al. dance of criminal wrongdoingg by ready chronic fiscal woes fror-4,, college officials and is uow saucing #lining oil tax revenues, with firms that sold the'derivatives. Fred Martin, a local accountant The lawyer declined to comment. and contributor to the college sakth- ''fficials at the firms declined to lents, said he is concerned abqut .neat. They include five Hous. the wily the school divuleed its AW tone companies—MGSI, Westcap Se•' problems. :'r� curitics, Arbour Financial Corp., Coastal Securities Ltd. and Govern. ment Securitiu Corp. of Texas — plus Gruntal & Co. in Florida.. DUNCAN E.BOECKMAN DENISE VOIGT CMWFORO ��/ >• SECUMTIES COMMISSIONER 'W "I`yyCHAIRMAN JOHN R.MORGAN T.DEON WARNER DEPUTY SECURfTIES COMMISSIONER MEMBER Mute �eruritiesoura • MAIL:P.O.BOX 13187 DAN R.WALIER AUSTIN,TEXAS 78711.3187 MEMBER 200 E. 10th Street,6th Floor Austin,Texas 78701 Phone(612) 306-8300 FAX(612) 306-8310 Re: Investments in Derivatives Dear Government Finance Officer: Lately, there has been some publicity about the substantial losses sustained by governmental organizations in Louisiana, Minnesota and Ohio from their investments in derivative financial products. As a government financial officer, you may be approached to invest public money in derivative products. Derivatives may be purchased directly or indirectly (by investing in an investment company, for example) . A derivative may also be created by entering into a contractual arrangement to exchange cash flows with another party (a "swap" agreement) . Derivatives can be enticing as they may initially show promise of high rates of return. But realize that in investing, the potential for a higher return is accompanied by a higher level of risk. The risks include suffering a partial or even total loss of the investment. The risks of derivatives, as Louisiana, Minnesota and Ohio have discovered, can be fiscally devastating. Businesses have used derivatives for years as hedges against adverse business conditions. Still, even businesses are not immune from the risks of these products as recent losses reported in the financial press have shown. Investment in derivatives requires that each party understand completely the details of the product, be able to manage the risk associated with the product and maintain a constant analysis of its position in the derivatives markets. With swiftness unusual in traditional equity and debt markets, losses in the derivative markets may come quickly and unexpectedly. We believe that it is important for government financial officers to have a fundamental understanding of investing in derivatives, including the higher risks associated with purchasing non- 'Derivative products (derivatives) may be a security or contract (including options, futures, options on futures, swap agreements, collateralized mortgage obligations, caps, collars, floors, to name a few) which derives its value from another security, currency, commodity or index. i traditional investments. Most derivatives are not subject to -o'' review by the State Securities Board (Agency) . Even those derivatives which are reviewed by this Agency may not be appropriate investments in all instances. In addition, you should be aware that this Agency can act as a resource by providing information on registered securities firms and agents who may be engaged in selling derivatives. We maintain a public record on each Texas registered brokerage firm and its agents which includes any disciplinary history. You may contact the Agency at (512) 305-8300 to request a copy of these records. If you believe that a person has sold or offered to sell you a security in violation of the Texas Securities Act, or if a person has sold you a derivative product which you believe was an unsuitable investment, you may contact the Agency's Enforcement= Division directly at (512) 305-8392 . It is always best to investigate before you invest. Very truly yours, 4 DENISE VOIGT CRAWFORD Securities Commissioner AUG 8 { O1 Eule AUGUST 5, 1994 rr n .- A MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTION NEWSLETTER OF THE GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION VOLUME 13,NUMBER 8 Mutual funds for public funds investment Congress turns up the heat on derivatives by Leon J. Karvelis, Jr. by Betsy Dotson Currently, there is a movement taking place in After returning from a brief recess, both the legislatures across the country to permit local House and Senate are now actively engaged in governmental entities to invest in Securities and the oversight of derivatives activities. A stepped- Exchange Commission (SEC)-registered mutual up hearings schedule and new legislation is funds. States.which have recently adopted such keeping all industry participants busy as Con- legislation include Connecticut and New Jersey; gress seems increasingly serious about tighten- and legislation is pending in other states, such as ing the rules for these complex products. New York and Massachusetts. In the House, subcommittees with oversight Providing additional investment options for responsibilities for financial institutions and fiscally hard-pressed local governments and finance held hearings on the use of derivatives. school districts can represent a good thing. From The Subcommittee on Financial Institutions a competitive point of view, the more options Supervision, Regulation and Deposit Insurance, available to the public cash manager the better. chaired by Representative Steve Neal (D-NC), Many states already allow the use of some forms held a hearing on H.R. 4503, the Derivatives of mutual funds for public funds investment and Safety and Soundness Supervision Act of 1994. have done so for years. The panel heard testimony from federal Investing in mutual funds is not necessarily a regulators and investment bankers regarding the no brainer." Safeguards and caveats must be legislation, which seeks to improve interagency observed. cooperation among the regulators in setting Mutual fund differences. In states where capital standards, suitability rules, risk manage- such legislation is now proposed, it is important ment and other derivatives-related regulations. to draw a distinction between the proposal to The bill also would prohibit financial institution allow the use of "mutual funds" for investment proprietary trading unless it has been approved purposes and the use of appropriately structured by the board of directors. "money market mutual funds." The differences The House Subcommittee on Telecom- between these forms of mutual investment are munications and Finance, chaired by Represen- considerable. tative Edward Markey (D-MA), heard from a "Mutual funds," per se, can consist of pooled panel of so-called derivatives "rocket scientists," investments in many types of underlying individuals who create and sell the models upon securities, such as domestic or foreign stock, which derivatives trades are carried out. This was fixed-income securities of all types and credit the fourth in a series of hearings held by this sub- qualities, unrated, or so-called "junk" bonds, committee. Chairman Markey announced during commodities and many other forms of invest- the hearing that he has introduced the ment. Derivatives Dealers Act of 1994 (H.R. 4745) Moreover, in terms of constant market value which would close gaps in the regulation of the benchmarks, liquidity and collateralization, many derivatives market by establishing controls over types of "mutual funds" are simply not suitable currently unregulated derivatives dealers. The bill for the investment of public funds under most ex- would: isting protective state laws and ordinances. - require currently unregulated derivatives Legislators deciding upon the permitted use dealers, such as those affiliated with securities of mutual funds would be well-advised to avoid or insurance firms, to register with the the investment eligibility of the catch-all category Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC); of "mutual funds" and, instead, focus upon pro- • authorize the SEC to set capital standards for, perly structured "money market mutual funds." In conduct inspections or examinations or, and fact, GFOA's Model Investment Legislation receive financial reports from such dealers; (continued on page 5) (continued on page 4) i Moving averages Derivatives (continued from page 1) 6-month Treasury bill discount yield • grant authority for writing sales practice rules, including suitability rules, for such dealers; 5.2% • enhance the SEC's anti-fraud and anti- manipulation authority; and 5.01 • define equity derivatives as securities. 5.0% 493 In the Senate, Committee on Banking, Hous- 4.9% %1. -4.91 ing and Urban Affairs Chairman Donald W. 4�0 4.8% 4.80 Riegle, Jr. (D-MI), has introduced the Derivatives a.80�.�4.84 4.84 Supervision Act of 1994 (S. 2291). Because the 4.7%-- - -'72 0 Senate banking committee has jurisdiction over 4.6% both financial institutions and broker/dealers, Chairman Riegle's regulatory legislation is u,y 27 1-3 10 17 24 .,, t 15 22 29 somewhat broader in scope than that introduced in the House. The Senate bill would: • separate certain derivative activities from the insured deposits of insured depository institu- 2-year Treasury note yield to maturity tions; • require regulatory coordination among financial 6.3% institution regulators with regard to capital, ac- 6.2% 817counting, disclosure, suitability and other 6.14 s.,a 609 regulatory actions; '-6.12'6`' • require that insured depository institutions and 6.0% x,.8.03 6.02 major dealers disclose certain specified quan- 5.9% `\ ,� 5.95 5.96 titative information with respect to their derivative instruments, provided separately for 5.8% exchange-traded and over-the-counter in- struments; 5.6% • require that the above institutions prepare a management plan that sets forth the purpose of 5.5% the derivatives holdings; how the holdings are consistent with a risk management plan; how wy 27 1,,.3 10 17 24 my 1 8 15 22 29 the institution acquires its derivatives; include a description of accounting methods; and require that derivative activities be conducted with 30-year Treasury bond yield to maturity direct oversight by senior executives; • require that any major dealer not currently sub- 7.81/4 ject to regulatory by a financial institution or 7.7 7.69 other regulator be subject to SEC regulation; 7.61 7.597.60 • provide for international coordination among 7'6`° Y U.S. regulators and institutions in outer coun- �.7s7 ��sa zs°r 7� 7� tries toward standardization; and 74% 747 • require that regulations be implemented that 7.38 reduce the risk associated with potential 7.3% systemic financial market failure. 7.2°/ 0 The SEC and six major dealers are working on voluntary standards related to derivatives m.y 27 3 10 17 24 ady1 8 15 22 29 trading. The SEC is interested in setting stan- dards dealing with suitability, capital re- quirements and additional disclosure about the derivatives operations of securities firms. Public Investor's four-week moving averages are calculated as the simple Throughout the remainder of this Congress, average of Friday closing yield quotations for the most recently offered six- additional Scrutiny is sure to be applied to the month Treasury bill(discount basis),two-year Treasury note and 30-year derivatives activities of both dealers and end Treasury bond.Moving averages are used by analysts to monitor trends and trend changes.Generally,interest rates are increasing(prices falling)when users. Public investors may expect further the moving average yield is rising and the current rate exceeds the moving legislative and regulatory initiatives. average.Conversely,current yields below a declining moving average are associated with lower interest rates(higher prices on fixed-income securities). Some market timers buy(or sell)longer maturities when current market yields Betsy Dotson is assistant director of GFCA's Federal fall below(or penetrate above)their moving averages. Liaison Center. -4- APPENDIX 4 City of EJess SchetlUe of Rrchases For Jute,1994 • Investment Type InstiAti on CD Certi.of Dep. FNMA Fed,Nall Mort,Asso. FHLB Fed.Home Loan Berk MERRILL Memh Lynch BK ONE Banc One MMSBW Masterson Moreland TBILL Treasuy&II FFCB Fed.Farm Credt Banc FHLMC Fed.Home Loan Mort. PRUD Prudertiel Secuities WAN Western Amer.Nati LM Landmark Baric REPO Rwchese Agreement TNOTE Treasuy Note SHEAR Shearson Lehman LGIF Local Gov't Inv Fuid SWSEC SoWwest Secanties Cost Accrued Total P-I @ hrv. Inti.I.D. Puchese Term Matuity Price Par Book Vakre Interest Total Yield To CoLvon Interest Seller Maty Net of Total Cost Type Number Date (in days) Dale Per$100 Value (Pnn.Orly) @ maty Rin-In M"ty Rete Ptrchased Inst. Di scout Premum Fend Rem&In Pu. of Investmert REPO 06103/94 100.0000 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 4.00% Landmark Van ass 500,000.00 500,000.00 PILP 06/07/94 100.0000 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 500.000.00 3.76% Pruderd at Van ous 500,000.00 500,000.00 PILP 06/10/94 100.0000 1,000,000.00 1,000.000.00 0.00 1.000.000.00 3.77% Prudential Van ous 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 FNMA 46165 06/17/94 94 09/19/94 98.8589 500,000.00 494,294.72 5,705.26 500,000.10 4.48% Pruderad 50 500,000.00 494,294.72 PILP 0623/94 100.0000 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 3.85% Prudential Venous 500,000.00 500,000.00 FNMA 062954 092954 98.8577 500,000,00 494,288.33 5,711.67 500,000.00 4.58% Pruderti al 50 500,000.00 494,288.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Totals 3,500,000.00 3,488,583.06 11,416.94 3,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3500,000.00 3,488,583.06 City of Euless Schedule of Maatibes For Jure,1994 Investment Type Institution CD Certi.of Dep. FNMA Fed,Nall Mort.Asso. FHLB Fed.Home Loan Banc MERRILL Merrill Lynch BK ONE Bark One DEAN Dew Wtter TRILL Treasury&11 FFCB Fed.Farm Credit Banc FHLMC Fed.Home Loan Mort. PRUD Prudential Seabees WAN Western Amer.Nett LM Landmark Bark REPO Repurchase Agreement TNOTE Treasury Note SHEAR Shearson Lehman LGIF Local Govt Inv Fund LIBRTY Liberty Capital Cost Accrued Total P+I @ Im Im I . Purchase Tenn Maturity Price Par Book Vakx Interest Total Pnn.+ Yield To Coupon Interest Seller Maty Net of Total Cost Type Number Date (n days) Date Per$100 Value (Prin.Only) @ maty Int.@ Maty Maturity Rate Purchased Inst. Discount Premum FW Prem&In Pur. of Investment PILP 06/01/94 100.0000 200,000.00 200.000.00 0.00 200,000.00 3.76% Prudential various 200,000.00 200,000.00 FFCB 40345 12/02/93 186 06/06/94 98.3002 500,000.00 491,500.83 8,499.17 500,000.00 3.39% MERRILL 1,8,39 500,000.00 491.500.83 REPO 06/1054 100.0000 500,000.00 500.000.00 778.08 500,778.08 4.00% Landmark venous 500,778.08 500,000.00 PILP 0611554 100.0000 500,000.00 500.000.00 0.00 500,000.00 3.84% Prudert al 2 500,000.00 500,000.00 PILP 06/1754 100.0000 500,000.00 500.000.00 0.00 500,000.00 3.86% Prudert at 9,17 500,000.00 500,000.00 TVA 16081 0623193 360 062354 100.0000 500.000.00 500,000.00 17,450.00 517,450.00 3.49% 3.49% MERRILL 2,8,39 517,450.00 500,000.00 PILP 062554 100.0000 500,000.00 500.000.00 0.00 500,000.00 3.88% Prudential 50 500,000.00 500,000.00 Totals 3,000.000.00 2,991,500.83 26,72725 3,018,228.08 0.00 0.00 3,018,228.08 2,991,500.83 Ofte City of Euess Schedule of Pucnases For May,1994 Investment Type irsbUon CD Cerb of Dep. FNMA Fed.Natl Mort.Asso. FHLB Fed.Home Loan Baric MERRILL Merrill Lynch BK ONE Bank One MMS&W Masterson Moreland TBILL Trea%ry&u FFCB Fed.Farm Credit Bark FHLMC Fed.Home Loan Mort. PRUD Prudential Secuifies WAN Western Amer.Nall LM Landmark Bank REPO Repuchase Agreement TNOTE Treasuy Note SHEAR Shearson Lehman LGIF Local Govt Ina Fund SWSEC Socfhwest Sec rtes Cost Acm*d Total P+I Q Inv. Ina.I.D. Puchase Term Mti Rice Par Book Value Interest Total Yield To Coupon Irterest Seller Maty Net of Total Cost Type Number Date (in days) Date Per$100 Value IPnn.Orly) maty Rin+Int Matuity Rate Puchased Inst. Discoul Premum Fund Prem&Irt Pr. of Investment REPO 05/13/94 100.0000 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 0.00 1,200,000.00 3.65% Landmark Van ous 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 FNMA 44934 05/02/94 95 08/05/94 98.9207 1,000,000.00 989,206.94 10,793.06 1,000,000.00 4.19% Prudert al Vanous 1,000,000.00 989,206.94 FNMA 44976 05/04/94 97 08/09/94 98.8683 500.000.00 494,341.67 5,658.33 500,000.00 4.31% Pudert al 4,9,40 500.000.00 494,341.67 FNMA 05/17/94 195 112854 97.3404 500,000.00 486.702.08 13,297.92 500,000.00 5.11% Prudent al 1 500,000.00 486.702.08 PILP 052754 100.0000 1,000.000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000,00 3.66% Prudert at Van ous 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Totals 4,200.000.00 4,170,250.69 29,749.31 4,200,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,200,000.00 4,170,250.69 City of EJess SchecUe of Mahsibes For May,1994 Investment Type Institution CD Card.of Dep. FNMA Fed.Nall Mort.Asso. FHLB Fed.Home Loan Baric MERRILL Merrill Lynch BK ONE Bene One DEAN Dean Witter TBILL Treasuy Bill FFCB Fed.Farm Credt Banc FHLMC Fed.Home Loan Mai. PRUD Prudential Securities WAN Western Amer.Nell LM Landmark Banc REPO Repurchase Ageement TNOTE Treasury Note SHEAR Shearson Lelnren LGIF Local Govt Irn Fund LIBRTY Liberty Capital Cost Accrued Total P-IQ In✓. Irv.I.D. Prchase Tenn Maturity Price Par Book Value Interest Total Prin.+• Yfald To Coupon Interest Seller Maty Net of Total Cost Type Number Date (in days) Date Per$100 Value (Pin.Ony) a maty In.G Maty Maturity Rate Purchased Inst. Discount Premum Fend Prem a Int Pu. of kveVnwt FNMA 5944 092953 215 05/0254 98.1128 665,000.00 652,449.97 12,550.03 665,000.00 3.26% MERRILL 2,4,9 665,000.00 652,449.97 CD 7610 1110353 180 05/02/94 100.0000 200,000.00 200,000.00 2,958.90 202,958.90 3.00% WANB 2 202,958.90 200,000.00 FNMA 7130 052153 347 0510354 99.8906 500,000.00 499,453.00 16,250.00 516,250.00 3.37% 3.25% 767.36 MERRILL 547.00 1,2 516,029.64 500,220.36 FFCB 39553 11/0953 177 05/0554 98.3972 500,000.00 491,985.83 8,014.17 500,000.00 3.36% MERRILL 1,2 500,000.00 491,985.83 REPO 100.0000 700,000.00 700,000.00 0.00 700,000.00 4.15% Landnerk Various 700,000.00 700,000.00 Totals 2,565,000.00 2,543,888.80 39,773.10 2,584,208.90 547.00 0.00 2,583,968.54 2,544,656.16 • • f" City of Euless Schedule of Purchases For April,1994 Investment Type Institution CD Cert.of Dep. FNMA Fed.Nall Mort.Asso. FHLB Fed.Home Loan Baric MERRILL Merrill Lynch SK ONE Bank One MMS&W Masterson Moreland TRILL Treasury Bill FFCB Fed.Farm Credt Bane FHLMC Fed.Home Loan Mat. PRUD Prudertlal Securities WAN Western Amer.Nall LM Landmark Bank LGIFT investment Pod TNOTE Treasury Note SHEAR Shearson Lehman LGIF Local GOVt Imr Furx) SWSEC Southwest Securities Cost Accrued Total P•I @ Irv. Irv.I D. Purchase Term Maturity Price Par Book Value Interest Total Yield To Capon Interest Seller Maty Not of Total Cost Type Nenber Date (in days) Date Per$100 Value (Priv.Oriy) @ maty Prin+Int Maturity Rate Purchased Inst. Discount Premien Fend Prem&Int Put. of Investment LGIF 0410794 100.0000 200,000.00 200,000.00 0.00 200.000.00 3.43% LGIF 26 200,000.00 200,000.00 FNMA 04/12194 227 112594 97.3391 500,000.00 466,695.28 13,304.72 500.000.00 4.38% Prudential 2 500.000.00 486,695.28 FFCB 44736 042594 177 10/1994 97.8662 500,000.00 489,330.83 10,669.17 500,000.00 4.50% MERRILL 12,21.26 500.000.00 489,330.83 FNMA 042994 210 112594 97.3925 515,000.00 501,571.36 13,428.63 515,000.00 4.64% Prudential 2 515,000.00 501,571.38 FHLB 042694 239 1212394 96.9859 430,000.00 417,039.56 12,960.44 430,000.00 4.72% MERRILL 8.29 430,000.00 417,039.56 TNOTE 042994 246 1215194 99.9531 500,000.00 499,765.63 234.38 500,000.00 4.69% 4.63% 7601.86 MERRILL 234.38 1,2 507,367.49 507,367.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Totals 2,645,000.00 2,594,402.67 50,597.33 2,645,000.00 7,601.86 0.00 234.38 2,652,367.49 2,602,004.54 City of Euless Schedule of McWibes For April,1994 Investmerl Type "Lion CD Cera.of Dep. FNMA Fed.Nall Mort.Asso. FHLB Fed.Home Loan Bank MERRILL Merrill Lynch BK ONE Baric One DEAN Dean Witter TBILL Treasry 611 FFCB Fed.Fane CredI Bal FHLMC Fed.Home Loan Mort. PRUD Prudertal Searibes WAN Westem Amer.Nat'l LM Landmark Bark LGIF Investmert Pod TNOTE Treasury Note SHEAR Shearson Lehman LGIF Local Gott Irw Fund LIBRTY Liberty Capital Cost Accrued Total P+I IM, Inv,I.D. P.rchase Term Mattrity Price Per Book Valu Irterest Total Prin.+ Yield To CoWon Irterest Seller Maty Net of Total Cost Type N rber Date (in days) Date Pa 9100 Velu (Prin.Orly) @ maty Ft.@ Maty Maturity Rate Purchased Inst. Di start Premium FW Prem&Int Pur. of kwestmert LGIF 04/05/94 100.0000 200,000.00 200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 3.361/6 LGIF 1,40 200,000.00 200,000.00 LGIF 04/12/94 100.0000 200,000.00 200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 3.39% LGIF 9 200,000.00 200,000.00 LGIF 04/19/94 100.0000 300,000.00 300,000.00 0.00 300,000.00 3.50% LGIF 9 300,000.00 300.000.00 LGIF 0420/94 100.0000 100,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 100,000.00 3.58% LGIF 9 100,000.00 100,000.00 FNMA 41410 11/11/93 104 0425/94 99.1131 500,000.00 495,565.56 4,434.44 500,000.00 3.14% MERRILL 1 500,000.00 495,565.56 FNMA 39553 08/31193 241 042954 97.8779 500,000.00 489,389.31 10,610.69 500,000.00 3.27% PRUDENTIAL 2 500,000.00 489,389.31 Totals 1,800,000.00 1,784,954.87 15,045.13 1,800,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,800,000.00 1,784,954.87