HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-11-21 CITY OF EULESS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 21, 2017
MINUTES
A regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by
Chairman Richard McNeese at 5:30 p.m. on November 21, 2017 in the Pre-Council
Conference Room of City Hall, 201 North Ector Drive. Those present included Chairman
Richard McNeese, Vice Chairman LuAnn Portugal, and Commission Members: Eric
Owens, Kenny Olmstead, Ronald Dunckel, Steve Ellis, and Warren Wilson.
During the Pre-Session Meeting:
➢ Senior Planner Stephen Cook reviewed the regular agenda.
➢ Director of Planning and Economic Development Mike Collins presented the
Development Update.
PLANNING AND ZONING CONSIDERATION OF SCHEDULED ITEMS — PRE-
COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM
The Euless Planning and Zoning Commission continued their meeting in the Council
Chambers at 6:30 p.m. for consideration of scheduled items.
STAFF PRESENT:
Mike Collins, Director of Planning and Economic Development
Stephen Cook, Senior Planner
Hal Cranor, Director of Public Works and Engineering
Tesla Worth, Administrative Secretary
Don Sheffield, Building Official
Paul Smith, Fire Marshal
VISITORS:
Elijah Ellis
Jeremy Tompkins
Amber Holligan
Joyous Israel
Shannon Calegari
Nick Calegari
Annie Kim
Bryan Newell
Sherry Adams
Tami Bopp
Kathy Lawson
Allen Bodzy
Timothy Gibson
Carlos Nunez
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 11 November 21, 2017
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 11 November 21, 2017
Micahel McKee
Lane Zarate
Naved Surani
Angela Franco
John Franco
Adam Erhardt
Ivan Flores
Moco Khan
Joshua Blevins
Russell Million
Isabel Garcia
Curtis Brown
Phillip Malachowski
Gordon Vanscoy
Dain Schneck
Rachel Schneck
Stephanie Matthews
Vernon Gotcher
Deanna Gotcher
Aimee Nash
Ali Tahir
Tahir Abbas
Aleem Ali
Mike Midgett
Kathy Midgett
Molly MacEwan
Steven Waguespack
Tyler Alley
Essa Alley
Anjani Amin
Ulupi Amin
Elaine Bolton
INVOCATION
Vice Chairman Portugal gave the invocation.
THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairman McNeese led the pledge of allegiance.
ITEM 1. APPROVED PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES
Commissioner Wilson made a motion to approve the minutes for the regular meeting
of November 7, 2017.
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 11 November 21, 2017
Vice Chairman Portugal seconded the motion. The vote was as follows:
Ayes: Chairman McNeese, Vice Chairman Portugal and Commission Members:
Owens, Olmstead, Dunckel, Ellis, and Wilson.
Nays: None
Abstention: None
Chairman McNeese declared the motion carried. (7-0-0)
ITEM 2. HELD A PUBLIC HEARING FOR SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NO. 17-11-SUP
AND DENIED RECOMMENDATION OF AN ORDINANCE
Chairman McNeese opened the public hearing at 6:35 p.m.
Senior Planner Stephen Cook gave a brief description of the case. MM3 Hospitality LLC
is seeking a Specific Use Permit for a limited service hotel to be located on the northeast
corner of Westpark Court and Dock McGinnis Drive. The hotel will be branded as a
Comfort Inn and Suites. The proposed hotel will be a four-story 51,349 SF structure and
contain ninety-five (95) rooms. The hotel has a mixture of traditional hotel rooms and
oversized suites. The hotel will provide a breakfast area, an enclosed pool, and a workout
room.
Access and Parking. Access to the hotel will be from two drive approaches from Doc
McGinnis. There will not be any drive approaches from Westpark Court. Parking for hotels
is set at one parking space per room unit. The hotel site plan includes parking for one
hundred five (105) vehicles, which is ten greater than the required minimum.
The hotel's primary fagade and entry will face to the west with a porte-cochere. None of
the hotel rooms will face to the south.
Architecture and Design. The Comfort Inn and Suites will have a three material facade
with stone and stucco elements above a brick veneer from the foundation to the first floor
ceiling height. The project will include landscaping surrounding the project.
Adjacent land uses include the 72-lot Cloisters Addition single-family residential
subdivision and undeveloped land zoned Community Business District (C-2) to the south,
undeveloped land zoned Community Business District (C-2) and the rear storage yard for
a construction equipment sales and leasing company to the east, a two restaurants to the
north, and undeveloped land zoned Community Business District (C-2) to the west.
City staff has several concerns related to the proximity of this hotel to the Cloisters
Addition. This single-family residential subdivision was approved as a Planned
Development in 2002 and was constructed in subsequent years. The subdivision is sixty-
five (65) feet from the nearest point between property lines of the two developments.
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 11 November 21, 2017
Criteria has been set forth as a guide for evaluating the adequacy of proposed
development in the City of Euless. The Planning and Zoning Commission and City
Council reviews Specific Use Permits for compliance with all applicable ordinances and
the comprehensive plan. The Code of Ordinances provides that a Specific Use Permit
shall not be recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission unless
the Commission finds that all of the conditions under Section 84-153 of the Unified
Development Code have been found to exist.
Staff has evaluated the application in accordance with the findings listed in Section 84-
153 of the Unified Development Code and recommends denial of the Specific Use Permit
based on the following:
• The benefits that the City gains from the proposed use do not outweigh the
loss of or damage to any homes, businesses, natural resources, agricultural
lands, historical or cultural landmarks or sites,wildlife habitats, parks, or natural
scenic, or historical features of significance and do not outweigh the personal
and economic cost of any disruption to the lives, business and property of
individuals affected by the proposed use.
• The location, nature and height of the buildings, structures, walls and fences
are out of scale with the neighborhood.
• The proposed use will not be compatible with and may be injurious to the use
and enjoyment of neighboring property and significantly diminish property
values within the vicinity.
• There is not sufficient landscaping and screening to ensure harmony and
compatibility with adjacent properties.
It is the Staff's opinion that there are additional remaining appropriately zoned properties
in the City of Euless with access and visibility from major arterial roads, which would be
better suited for a hotel use.
If the Planning and Zoning Commission determines to recommend approval of the
Specific Use Permit, then staff would recommend the following conditions:
a. The Specific Use Permit is tied to the Property Owner: MM3 Hospitality LLC; and,
b. The Specific Use Permit is tied to the Business Name: Comfort Inn and Suites,
and,
c. The Specific Use Permit may be revoked if one or more of the conditions imposed
by this permit has not been met or has been violated.
Chairman McNeese asked to hear from any proponents who wished to speak.
Molly MacEwan of Vision Commercial Real Estate at 100 W. 7th Street, Fort Worth, Texas
distributed a presentation regarding the project. She stated that the applicant would
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 11 November 21, 2017
approximately hire 20 people and invest $7 million into the site. She stated that the
bowling alley nearby is open late and that the QuickTrip is open 24 hours. She stated that
the hotel guests would be driven by the hospitals nearby. She stated the property has
been on the market for 4 months. She stated that there are no windows facing the south
towards the residential area, and there will be a privacy fence. The applicant is willing to
build an iron fence and install more shrubs to hide the parking lot. There would be no
entrances from Westpark Court, both entrances are located on Dock McGinnis Drive.
Steven Waguespack with Choice Hotels stated he was available to answer any questions
about the brand.
Chairman McNeese asked to hear from any opponents who wished to speak.
Lane Zarate, resident of 1901 Sharpsbury Drive in the Cloisters subdivision, stated that
the hotel may not have windows on the south side, but that the neighborhood wraps north
on the east side of the property, and would therefore have windows facing those homes.
She stated that there are two hotels immediately across the highway, and another two
along the access road past Industrial Boulevard. She stated that she felt if the hospitals
needed to expand, this property would be the only viable location. She stated that the four
story building adjacent to the neighborhood would negatively impact the property values
for the homeowners. She stated that she has concerns over the amount of added traffic
to the area, because she and her neighbors frequently take walks with their children. She
also stated that the development would negatively impact the green space and tree life
at the property.
Josh Blevins, resident of 308 Cadbury in the Cloisters subdivision, stated that he is the
vice president of the home owner's association, and has lived there for 14 years. He
stated that his three advantages of living in the neighborhood are that it is quiet,
convenient, and practical. He stated that he believes this proposed use negatively
impacts all three. He stated that there is only one way to get to the highway for the
residents of his neighborhood, through a congested intersection, and that this property
will add to that traffic. He also expressed concern over the negative impact on property
values. He stated that with too many hotels in the area, room rates are lowered, and he
believes that attracts less than prime customers. He stated that with more traffic, more
people, and more noise, he doesn't believe there is any positive impact on the community
nor that there is a demand for the type of business.
John Franco, 13 year resident of 305 Foxbury, stated that the Whataburger and QuickTrip
have both experienced robberies at their 24 hour operations. He stated that the crime rate
associated with hotels in other areas of Euless make him uneasy about the potential for
this site. He also stated that he believes the hotel would be adding more traffic to the
already congested area.
Michael McKee, resident of the Cloisters subdivision since it was built, stated that he
would rather the change in zoning be made to that property to allow for more residential
homes than the hotel development. He stated that he walks with his children, has seen
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 11 November 21, 2017
truck drivers walking around his neighborhood that park nearby, and worries that the hotel
would bring even more people to his neighborhood. He stated that he believes the
potential in crime would rise, the property values would lower, and that the negative
impact outweighs the positive.
Dain Schneck, resident of 911 Red Maple Road, stated that he sympathizes with the
concerns of the Cloisters residents. He stated that he believes hotels directly adjacent to
residential neighborhoods in the city would disturb the peace and quiet residents desire
at their family homes.
Chairman McNeese asked audience members to raise their hands if they agreed with the
statements of opposition made by the residents. 47 audience members raised their
hands.
Chairman McNeese closed the public hearing at 7:05 p.m.
Commissioner Owens stated that he appreciated both the applicant's time, and the
residents for their concerns. He stated his concern was primarily with the proximity to the
neighborhood, with the hotel being four stories tall and a 24 hour business. He stated that
he does not think that the proposed business is the best use for this location.
Commissioner Olmstead thanked the audience for their participation.
Vice Chairman Portugal stated that she agreed with the statement from Commissioner
Owens. She stated that she understood the residents who expressed concern over losing
the green space, but that any developer could come build on that land, and many
businesses within the C-2 zoning do not require a Specific Use Permit to proceed. She
stated that eventually the land owners will want to sell their land, and encouraged
residents to continue to monitor the development. She stated that given the distance from
the highway and the proximity to the residential neighborhood, she did not believe that
the location was ideal for a hotel.
Commissioner Dunckel stated that he did not feel this location was the best for a hotel.
Commissioner Ellis stated that he was pleased with the quality of product presented, as
well as the attention to landscaping, and that there were a number of other locations in
the city that he would support this development.
Commissioner Wilson thanked the audience for their attendance, and stated that he
encouraged residents to attend both the Planning and Zoning Commission as well as City
Council meetings.
Chairman McNeese stated that based on Section 84-153 of the Unified Development
Code, he did not believe that this location is the appropriate place to build this hotel.
There were no further questions or comments presented by the Commission.
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 11 November 21, 2017
Commissioner Ellis made a motion to recommend denial of Case No. 17-11-SUP for a
Specific Use Permit on Westpark Professional Centre Addition, Block 1, Lots 2R1 and 2R
for a Hotel in the Community Business District (C-2) with the conditions as presented.
Commissioner Dunckel seconded the motion. The vote was as follows:
Ayes: Chairman McNeese, Vice Chairman Portugal and Commission Members:
Owens, Olmstead, Dunckel, Ellis, and Wilson.
Nays: None
Abstention: None
Chairman McNeese declared the motion carried. (7-0-0)
ITEM 3. HELD A PUBLIC HEARING FOR SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NO. 17-1 S-SUP
AND RECOMMENDED AN ORDINANCE
Chairman McNeese opened the public hearing at 7:17 p.m.
Senior Planner Stephen Cook gave a brief description of the case. Mr. Sosa was originally
issued a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for the operation of a Tire Repair Shop in November
2010 with the following conditions:
The Specific Use Permit is tied to the Business Owner James Sosa;
• The Specific Use Permit is tied to the Business Name: Hwy 10 Tire Shop;
• All tires stored on site whether new or used, shall be stored in a manner that is
screened from public view from the right-of-way and shall be stored under cover
so as to not allow the collection of rainwater within the tires;
• All repair of tires shall be conducted within the building or within the fenced area
behind the building;
• Outdoor storage is prohibited in front of the building; and
• The term of this Specific Use Permit shall be granted for a period of one year
in order to gauge the further appropriateness of the use at the specific location.
The last renewal of the Specific Use Permit was approved and included a stipulation that
it was valid for a period of six (6) months in order to gauge the further appropriateness of
the use at the specific location due to numerous issues of non-compliance of the above
conditions.
Since the latest renewal, there have been no occurrences of Code Compliance issues
with the business. Planning and Development has not had any enforcement issues.
Based on the current history of the business, staff recommends approval of the Specific
Use Permit with the following conditions:
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 11 November 21, 2017
a. The Specific Use Permit is tied to the Business Owner: James Sosa; and,
b. The Specific Use Permit is tied to the Business Name: Hwy 10 Tire Shop; and,
c. All tires stored on site whether new or used, shall be stored in a manner that is
screened from public view from the right-of-way and shall be stored under cover
so as to not allow the collection of rainwater within the tires; and,
d. All repair of tires shall be conducted within the building or within the fenced area
behind the building; and,
e. Outdoor storage is prohibited in front of the building; and,
f. The auto repair services provided by this establishment are tire repair and wheel-
related repairs. Any other auto repair services are in violation of this Specific Use
Permit.; and,
g. The Specific Use Permit may be revoked if one or more of the conditions imposed
by this permit has not been met or has been violated.
h. Upon revocation or expiration of the Specific Use Permit, all uses permitted
hereunder shall cease.
Chairman McNeese asked to hear from any proponents/opponents who wished to speak.
Seeing none, Chairman McNeese closed the public hearing at 7:19 p.m.
Chairman McNeese asked if the applicant was present.
Mr. Cook stated that he was not.
Mike Collins, Director of Planning and Economic Development, stated that since the
automotive shop is solely run by Mr. Sosa, if he leaves the building, the business has to
close.
Vice Chairman Portugal asked that since there were previously numerous issues, if the
applicant understood the conditions as presented for this Specific Use Permit.
Mr. Cook stated that the conditions were made clear to the applicant. He stated that with
the removal of the time period associated as a condition of the Specific Use Permit, if
there is a compliance issue, the Specific Use Permit would come back before the Planning
and Zoning Commission and City Council.
There were no further questions or comments presented by the Commission.
Vice Chairman Portugal made a motion to recommend approval of Case No. 17-15-SUP
for a Specific Use Permit on J. P. Halford Addition, Block D, Lot 7, 116 W. Euless
Boulevard for a Tire Repair Shop in the Texas Highway 10 Multi-Use District (TX-10)with
the conditions as presented.
Commissioner Wilson seconded the motion. The vote was as follows:
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 9 of 11 November 21, 2017
Ayes: Chairman McNeese, Vice Chairman Portugal and Commission Members:
Owens, Olmstead, Dunckel, Ellis, and Wilson.
Nays: None
Abstention: None
Chairman McNeese declared the motion carried. (7-0-0)
ITEM 4. APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT NO. 17-07-PP
Senior Planner Stephen Cook gave a brief description of the case. The applicant
proposes to preliminary plat the above described property for commercial development.
The technical aspects of the subdivision, including setback distances and placement of
easements, are in compliance with the City of Euless Unified Development Code.
The Development Services Group has reviewed the proposed Preliminary Plat and has
certified that it meets the technical standards of the City of Euless. Staff recommends
approval.
There were no further questions or comments presented by the Commission.
Commissioner Dunckel made a motion to approve Case No. 17-07-PP for a Preliminary
Plat of 3.607 acres in Adam Bradford Survey, Abstract No. 152, Tracts 1, 1B, 1A7C, and
a portion of 1A7 to be platted as Cadence Capital Addition, Block A, Lots 3 &4 located in
the 900 block of E. Harwood Road.
Commissioner Owens seconded the motion. The vote was as follows:
Ayes: Chairman McNeese, Vice Chairman Portugal and Commission Members:
Owens, Olmstead, Dunckel, Ellis, and Wilson.
Nays: None
Abstention: None
Chairman McNeese declared the motion carried. (7-0-0)
ITEM 5. RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN NO. 17-13-SP
Senior Planner Stephen Cook gave a brief description of the case. The developer of the
property is seeking approval of a site plan to construct a 9,893 SF retail/restaurant
commercial building. The lot they are intending to development is located southwest of E.
Harwood Road and Bear Creek Parkway. The project is a C-2 style commercial lot within
the Riverwalk Planned Development District.
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 10 of 11 November 21, 2017
Access—Access to the property is made from a drive approach onto E. Harwood Road.
There will be a cross access easement along the frontage of the property, creating a
connection between the hard corner of the intersection eastward to the recently
constructed convenience store and gasoline sales.
Parking—The site will have seventy-five (75) parking spaces, which meets the standards
of the City.
Landscaping — Landscaping is focused primarily on the streetyard located between the
front of the building and the street right-of-way. There is a five-foot buffer with shrubs as
required by code along the rear masonry wall already constructed between the subject
property and the Estates at Bear Creek subdivision.
Exterior—The new building will be a masonry building with a mixture of brick and facade
stonework on the building. Metal canopies will featured over windows and doors. The
lighting on the site has been evaluated to ensure that building and parking lot lighting will
not intrude into adjacent properties.
The Development Services Group has certified that the site plan is in accordance with the
requirements of the City of Euless.
Commissioner Ellis asked if there was access to the property from the south side rear
parking lot.
Mr. Cook stated that there are only service doors on the south elevation, not customer
entrances.
There were no further questions or comments presented by the Commission.
Commissioner Olmstead made a motion to approve Case No. 17-13-SP for a Site Plan
for Commercial Development proposed to be located on 1.363 acres to be platted as
Cadence Capital Addition Block A, Lot 3, 900 Block of E. Harwood Road.
Commissioner Wilson seconded the motion. The vote was as follows:
Ayes: Chairman McNeese, Vice Chairman Portugal and Commission Members:
Owens, Olmstead, Dunckel, Ellis, and Wilson.
Nays: None
Abstention: None
Chairman McNeese declared the motion carried. (7-0-0)
ITEM 6. ADJOURN
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 11 of 11 November 21, 2017
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:31 p.m
CAairmaA Richard McNees Date
I