HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-12-03 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES
December 3, 2002
Chairman McNeese called the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee meeting to
order at 7:18 p.m., immediately following the adjournment of the regular Planning and
Zoning Commission Meeting.
MEMBERS AND STAFF PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT
Chairman McNeese Ron Hughes
Vice Chairman Grove
Bill Tarin
Monty Huffman
John Deithloff
Tony May
Mike Collins, Director of Planning and Development
Eric Wilhite, Planning and Development Manager
Ron Young, Dir. of Public Works
Robert Barker, City Engineer
Bill Ridgway, Director of Economic Development
Karla Allen, Administrative Secretary
VISITORS:
There were no visitors.
Approval of minutes from called meeting of June 4, 2002
Commissioner Tarin made the motion to approve the minutes from June 4, 2002
meeting as submitted. Vice Chairman Grove seconded the motion. The vote was as
follows:
Ayes: Chairman McNeese, Vice Chairman Grove, Commissioners Tarin, Huffman,
Deithloff and May
Nays: None
Abstention: None
The motion carried (6-0-0).
ITEM 1 CASE #02-03-CIAC— CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 02-03-
CIAC
Consideration of a resolution adopting the Capital Improvements Advisory
Committee Semi-Annual Report for the period of April 2002 through
September 2002 and conveying it to the City Council
Capital Improvement Advisory Committee 2
December 3, 2002
Mike Collins, Director of Planning and Development, gave a brief overview of this
case. The City Council has appointed this Commission to serve as the Capital
Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC). This committee serves as an advisory
committee to file semi-annual reports with respect to the progress of the capital
improvements plan and report to the City Council any perceived inequities in
implementing the plan or imposing the impact fee. Attached for consideration is
Resolution #02-03-CIAC conveying the Semi-Annual report for the period of April 1,
2002 through September 30, 2002 (Exhibit A). During the period of April 1, 2002
through September 30, 2002, water and sewer impact funds totaling $151,815.71 were
allocated for four (4) projects that included a TRA debt payment of$145,879.50;
Birkhoff, Hendriks & Conway review of Impact Fees of$675.00; Landmark Structures
(Water Tower) for $3,150.00; and, Mid State Utilities (16"Water Line)for$2,111.21.
Staff is recommending no changes to the Capital Improvement Plans or to the
implementation of the impact fee program, therefore, recommends that the committee
approve the report to be forwarded to the City Council for acceptance.
Commissioner May asked what the TRA debt was. Ron Young, Dir. of Public Works,
stated this was for the water and is a monthly payment made for our share of
improvements to the water treatment plant.
Vice Chairman Grove made a motion to approve resolution #02-03-CIAC adopting the
Capital Improvements Advisory Committee Semi-Annual Report for the period of April 1,
2002 through September 30, 2002. Commissioner Huffman seconded the motion. The
vote was as follows:
Ayes: Chairman McNeese, Vice Chairman Grove, Commissioners Tarin, Huffman,
Deithloff and May
Nays: None
Abstention: None
The motion carried (6-0-0).
There being no further business, Chairman McNeese adjourned the meeting at
7:25 p.m.
C airma Richard Neese Date
EXHIBIT A
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
APRIL 1, 2002 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2002
BY THE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
December 3, 2002
PURPOSE
This semi-annual report was prepared by the Capital Improvements Advisory
Committee to advise the City Council of the progress of the "Three Year Water
and Wastewater Impact Fee Review" and the Capital Improvements Plan, as well
as, any perceived inequities found in implementing the Plan or imposing the
impact fees. It is intended to satisfy the requirements of Chapter 395 of the Local
Government Code.
LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS
The Land Use Assumptions, adopted by City Ordinance No. 1364 on April 27,
1999, provided a description of the City's water and wastewater service area, as
well as, projections of changes in land use densities and intensities, and
projections of population changes in the service area over a ten year period from
1999 to 2009. The Land Use Assumptions contained within the "Three Year
Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Review" were appropriate for use as the
basis for the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP).
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN:
WATER AND WASTEWATER
Appendices A and B of the "Three Year Water and Wastewater Impact Fee
Review" show eligible existing facility costs and eligible proposed facility costs
identified in the CIP adopted for water and wastewater in 1999. Pages 13-17 of
the same report describe the Living Unit Equivalency and Maximum Impact Fee
calculations. The CIP is progressing at a pace that meets the demands of the
City of Euless. Additions to the water and wastewater systems will be
implemented as development occurs within those areas of the City needing
additional capacity. The consulting firm of Shimek, Jacobs and Finklea previously
completed an update of the City's Water Distribution Master Plan which
concluded that no changes were necessary to the CIP.
IMPACT FEE CHARGES
The 1999 impact fee update states that the actual cost of providing capital
improvements needed to maintain the current level of service were $2,673.93 per
service unit for water facilities and $184.50 per service unit for wastewater
facilities. These figures represent the maximum impact fee per service unit that
could be charged by the City.
Impact fees set by the City Council in 1999 were 50% of the maximum impact fee
amount allowed. City Council Ordinance No. 1364 established impact fees per
service unit of $1,336.97 for water facilities and $92.25 for wastewater facilities.
Fees charged for both water and wastewater facilities are based on water meter
size, with a 5/8" water meter considered one service unit. Wastewater impact
fees are not charged when water meters are installed for water that will not enter
the wastewater system, such as landscape irrigation. The Ordinance established
the following impact fees:
Meter Size
(inches) Water Sewer Total
5/8" or 3/4" $1,336.97 $92.25 $1,429.22
1" $3,342.42 $191.42 $3,533.84
1.5" $6,684.83 $382.84 $7,067.67
2" $10,695.72 $612.54 $11,308.26
3" $32,087.16 $1,837.62 $33,924.78
4" $56,152.53 $3,215.84 $59,368.37
6" $123,000.78 $7,044.21 $130,044.99
8" $213,914.40 $12,250.80 $226,165.20
10" $334,241.25 $19,141.88 $343,383.13
IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT, COLLECTION, AND DISBURSEMENT
From October 1, 2001, through March 31, 2002, a total of 442 service units were
added for water and 346 for wastewater. Impact fees collected were
$295,123.45 for water and $15,939.81 for wastewater. Impact fee funds
disbursed from the accounts during this time period totaled $594,786.59. Projects
funded include: Heritage Park 2MG Elevated Storage; 16" Southside Water
Supply Line; and, TRA Debt Payment.
CONCLUSION
The Capital Improvements Advisory Committee finds that for the time period
included in this report, no inequities were created in imposing the impact fees
and the fees were properly revised as a result of the Three Year Impact Fee
update required by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. The
assessment and collection of water and wastewater impact fees was in
accordance with the guidelines of Ordinance No. 111, Ordinance No. 1364, and
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. All money collected was
deposited into separate interest bearing accounts reserved for impact fees.