HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-01-04 19B3--00i
,C,ENDA
2011 €`•o-tti c.ct.nr Drive
Wess, ft;xas 76039
January 4, 1983
7530 Vnx Pre—Commission Meeti'iq to Dis F
i�, , Agf.•.f;cic Items
-i( Il.i 1. {_ j. to Order fOr Cofr}fFli`i5ior, Ci nsii eration of Siche 13-iied Remis
INVOICATION
APPROVAL O P1INUTES _. :iR,eE:uiar Meeting Dated December 21, Int?
C>.?m!binef€ 's.;�l'i:f?i::;.?_'', ex Final Platting of Victoria P rk Addition, located
north of S.Il Iff, soi-it`-, of tV,7iry Drive. cast- of Debra Drive ar- 'rr
Marlene Drive.
II. PUBLIC €--!EARJ`.€`-X-1
Zoninq Cease #30 -• \eEfi wt. of Norm?a Gardner for change of 1'f7f1ing fi' r—n
15-2-to S 07715 for tavern ard billiards on Lot 3. 13€ock 3 E mac; G'ardens
, WAY north of f£)w Creek € rive, SOLah of East; Midway Drive, east.
flf tl^if? Street and west of Sole m. Drive.
I£i. I�t.ft_tt_IC HE/V-,'.ING
_..�on_._in..g...,.' , ,e #3 81 - Request r.•f Davi d ~ua) for~ !&N ---•?nd Corporation For
change of z'arbig from FW to C.1 on. 'i•r ac' I•B, 6I-;,
! -705, €rcated south Cat i{1
� < tt Survey,
1 =�y Drive, Eafit of 3tf
i`ilf�,.f. ��tf'E`
f •-s
west of international [Drive and north of °_dxpence Une.
1983-002
RegUICAr iNleetin€]
January 4, 190-1
1-0 ORDER
The reg:. ar rn€eHng of the PI., nning u Zoning Commission w.ais called t€3 order at 7:30,
p.nn. in. the Council of Euless City Hall by Chairman John Deithlcff.
NIEN,l,'.--3ERS PRESENT MENABERS ABSENT
John DeittAC)ff
Bob :'HHarnson
)hn L y>"ic.h
Robert, W-Ail.lcr:
Norma R.rr:vcsr
Sam Catten
Cla r i
Jarfnes Kni€li-Its City Engineer
€pel/y I-•.iull, Cie elopryient Cow inatnr
VISITORS
D�,vidl Huey
N€n-na Gardner
Barbara L-indsay
i..1 ayd WaHs
Torn CI"?anribiemss
Greg Boyd
:{uilli.e Nlae !AcC€ nrucl
.John x CynLh.i I l...eCler;,c{
.Jackie. Edwards
Bern Perkins
J::ick Connell, Jr.
G.F. Parker
Ar. & Mrs. `,-�or=e.rt I--IIII
INVO CATION
The .ill'Y'i2cation was gi% ri by Nlr. San-i Ci3Uen..
,=P?ROV"al__ Chi €` l,,IUTES 11
The minutes of the rgWar meeUnq dated De-cember ii> 1982, approved ved
writ.-
ten.
a .
F-Iaqe Two, Pla.".-Tiinq e, Zonirm Commission, January 4, 1903 1983-603
CONSIDEIP, PLATTI.NG C-O`,IBI:--JED P_REJ-DAR-.ARY & '.F1NPd- PLATTING OF'
T T L CC A T
F' --bT.... ——-----------
EAsf- 'i-- At-,'D...
-................---—---------- ---,................. ---------- ..................
Gre-,,,j Boyd with jones & Boyd Engineering, presented the request for Prtehrninary
& Final Platting of Victoria Park Addition,
Wairman DeMoff Nlr, Boyd to 8dfJreLs the & Zoning letter dated
December 29, 1962,
N& Boyd convnented an the letter Rem by itern as follows:
1. ;-\riy additional ease-ments that rrm.y be required he shown on the plat
Prior to filing of the plat vjiLh the C-buirity.
2, The developer -wJ-.H escrow funds for the cn-,Ftr uctior. of curb and gutter,
paving, and stor"i drain Age improvements ,,long State i-lighway 10.
3. The developer w.11 comply with the trash durnp-ster requirements.
4. The developer that the bemn discussed at the zoning meeting L�etveen
this property and adijacent residences becamie unworkable c,,nd posed a
drainage prot',-lem and was thereby elinniriated.
5. Abe developer has requested perriission from Lhe State f-');8parf.ment of
14ghways and Ruit-Aic Trancpoftation for the proposed --disch.,m-ge of storm
df-ai,. ge on the 'A ate Highway 10 ric-l-it
,j by rmeanp, of conenete flurnes.
6. The developer intends to bore beneath the to snake :h/liter to 3.
Nt. Tyson asked F-31oyd to coniment on the traffir-, safety 11111 etter dated Decemlber
20, 19M
NA;r. i-3oyd stated that it the en •ance or, Debra. was placed near S-tate Hjghway If.) there
,,,vould not be enough rionni 'or vehicle storage for traffic onto MA 10, thm creadnE-
a UP% problem at this intersection. He also felt that there would be q lot. rnore
trafhe problems if the main Wrwice was placed an State f-iighim,,ay If.) instead ol'
Debrek and Marlene.
1%,11r, Tyson stated 1h.s. concern about having ifiqres!3/eqress. ref: of N-larlene and Debra aricJ
preferred that they be off of 1.1--fighmay 1,01, inste ,,d.
t'vir% K,.night stal.ed that havAN the ingress/egress off of Marlene and Debra v,,our d cut
dia,wn on points of conflict atung State Highway 10. He pointed out that is
deskgriated as a collector AreeL on the City's F-uture Land We Map
Mter additional discussion, Mr. Cotten made a ,notion to rem-irn rr-..e rid approval of the
Preliminary & F-inai F:Ilatlirig of Victoria Part as presented t,,ajbject, to J,-InieL, Knight's
lettef, dated Decembci- 291 1982.
Mr. fv1,r.NA!111o!-. seconded the rrioLion and the vote is as follows-
5� '7 . t'
6 'r { Three, 1751annum, a A.-oning Lmin i,,ission,
ary 4, 198:13 1983-004
...........
Ayes: Mrs, Runyon and Messrs. VVilliarnson, Lynch, Doithloff, iA(-,Mflilon, Cotten. &
Ty ,nn
Nays- None
Chairrn,an D. iffiloff declared the rnotion carried.
IL
PUBLIC HEAFRV%-K,-a f-,ASE #382? - RE-QUES)T OF NiOi-RWA GARDI'•UR F --')R
r�%O ------A' - 0 N.,
r�%O
r�%O
------- ----F -j'k- r�%O -'R� --q-
cF 7-DNIN-C FIR J�4 --2 F(D C-2 wiSP ( rA -'R� I-) BU P
(- i-'..CCA-ED NC)PT1-1 C)F' TC-)WN CREEK
sc--,--uYH....oF o T i... ST.-Riff Y Fw)
i-T ORM
I----------—-----------------—
ChMrrnan Deindoff opened the puWie hearing and exWadwd that the proponents would
be heard first and than the opponents.
Novi-na (.'3,aj,-(J'ner of Adington stated that she pr;,:�,Aously had a bar at the sanle '10coti-on
and Would now W to get the proporty rezoned to New her to r✓opeti the
neQhbmtood ban Rw pointed out that it would be by private nne.mbership only.
Df-.-Ahloff asked for any other proponents There none, asked for
Tf
ar.y opponents. I -tere, were nonf-7-!.
Mr. Tyson asked Ydiri t the hours of operation would be.
ivlrs. Cirdner tRod that lvlon-day thru Friday they would be open frorn 2.00 P.rn. -ntil
240 xnL, Saturday frWT1 12-01.1 n-non until 2MO mnn, and "5unday p,f-n-.. until
12:00 n-udniqht.
Nir. McMillon, as✓od Mrs. Gardner if she felt there WOLdd be a parking, pr ;1
Mrs. ;'3ardner stated that she Ad not believe them woWd be a parkini_j proble.--n because
the tavern would be open vvhen Midway C-afe closes.
Nin Lynch asked about the ryonber of parking spaces th,,nt are- available.
NIT'. Gre.,,,m, Owner of the, building, stated that there are 'approxinately 50 spacei, for
the entire building.
Chair(nari Deithloff closed the public hearing.
Mr. Lynch stated that he did not NO that there was rm-i-ch difference between the
public establisfunents that have weviomly been denied ar-.-d the proposed ,rivate
establ ishinent.
Mrs. Gardner explained how, the. membership would" be handled,
14% Tyson niade a notion to i,ecomrnenid denial of Zoniniq Case #382.
facie cur, f=€c�i3Fitn3. :x Z�3rtirt^ C:tliEtritissirsn, JctEtl.fc3r� '�, tr3 S.5 1983-005
Mr.lr'. 'v�lilliaE"E3 ^v(3 seconded 1178 f7-io)-ic—i and t€ie -vote is as follows;
Ayes: ions= Tyson, Lynch, Delt aff and v`•%illiarrison
Nays. klrs, ,Ri.in1ori and Messrs. Cotten and t••tl`,m Hon
Chairman Deithloff declared the motion. carried.
III.
Pt;;3i...iC. F IEAI�Nt-', Z 0.-' 111` (-,' CASE if 83 - !REQUEST OF D;^,VII.-) l--lUEY FOR 1..&N
1_A,1,�� .t l ti 301 ATILJN C:tt� _,1 €`Si at OF .'3f ;NN G k ON -J
`z. H li ...1. fit A-
F A'-!05 L:.JE'. a f ED S{?l,! €€ l (,'t� � �i r.,}ILA i°1�':`� :;I t l
- —
............. -- __----------
_ OF N ?E 1> ! €J`:..\J€'�1 "'TREET, v^1:: iT f=?1 €�11 is:< f:1{ Tll 1, l ` �Ittw N`"? i� <€��fi€-z
OF SIX�`)EtICE
Chairrnar3 opened the pudic hearing and explained that the proponents would
be heard first and then the opponents.
Mr. David 1'-"Itwyy, L&N Land: Cor poratiory presented ffie reqi.uesL for rezoning from R-
1 to .-l. Fie s=tud that the property was riot sulLable for residential use and asked
to rezone the property to C'.-1 to allow for an office site.
(:'€ nirrE3z;ri Deithlolff asked if there were riny additional . roponents. There tieing none,
he asked for any oppnnent:s.
Mrs. Ki— e Perkin-,, 301 ` ix€lc'ncc, Mr. P\obert. 1-Iil.1, 301 ixp. nce; --ind Mr. Jack Connel.,
21: iki'nCF„ i�3�::8 �£ a in st the requested onirg. Their ET ^in e ncern was the fact
that anything in the C-1 district could to built c"i that sites and the fact that Huey
had stated they did not have a potential buyer for Uds property so there was no
gttara„tee that an office he ildinrl would he rgilt art this site.
Mr. Hoeyf ;tatted that. they wouirl deed restrict the case of the property.
It- waL, pointed .:ut that. the City, does not enforce deed restrictions, ,ir;d that the orgy
way for '.lie ;--'it-,y to enforce any restrict ions would b£, through a planned development.
;=after ndditk;nal discussi-)n, Chairman Deithloff ^lased the public hearing.
After coritin:.F. l dise ussinn FfrE"ono the members, Mr. Cotten :rude -a motion to
LoE"fin£:{ l.,<zSE` #383 to il.l.r1w tl°3E;' l'sr=t"1t,.iC'eI3e1' to come i)t?C€'•' mllt.tZ >^ Cfe\%('frJpment tJtc3rF.
Nl-r. WtvIdion seconded the notion..
Knight C; ;utioned the ag�ajnst suggesting the r.eveloper '.iC3 for a Sl:)e ?fj
type of zoning.
After a%tdatictn 1. di;;cus-;iorq Mr. Cotten let: his motKon stand as rrt; de. lvlr. IlAcMillon
withdrew his sei-:i3nd to the £notion. and the motion diied for the lick of a 8£tic)rF i.
t'dr. M+ Mill.c-n made, a. mot:ior: t ) deny Zoning Case #383.
;�E t`'133 06
January M 1983
98 -01
.................
L-Ic-,
soconded Lhe moUmi and the vote A as fAIMM
Ayes; Mess PocKlIon, Delthlolfi Willian-is on 8ndl Lynch
Nays- fvIrs. RWIYOVI O-)kl tt
Abstention. Mr. Tysm)
i
Chairn-ian De t hloff der-,lared the, rnotion ca.-r
IV.
AD30URNMENIT
There being no further 11--u-siness, W conduct, the nleetiflg W;F-s a(JJ*Ouf"---Fr; clt 9,00 P.pl-
Y rn
v