HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-02-01 i 1i F N y!
z
Plar#riinq & Zoning for?"#rnissiffn
My of Euless
2 10 1 North l cLor Drive
Euless, Texas
February 1, 1983
6:45 1J.#" 1. Meeting to Discus Aq,,i)'C#da .It:Qms
7.31 p.m. - <: # I To Order to Discuss, Seheduled Re.ms
Al:�I'RC AL_ OF MlN?.lT S -- Regular MinuteB Dated January 18, 1983
i. SIDER PI-A I ING
fn-i Pl:`3ttlnis of Arbors of Euless -• Phase 11, located north of Ntidway Dirive.
east of Fuller-VIis+ r goad and nout.h of Harwood Drive.
11. ., .)NSlEjE 'L_..A.1 i INIG
Final Pint .ing of !-'u-boir.s of 1:.ules3 T ph-asc, ITT, lf.,c.-`ed nor .h c• Midway Drive,
east. &
ell. lest, o Fkllef'- k3er Rua, and south of Harwood .)rive.
Pi3rC H_P,,R1Nr
Z.C. #586 - Request of Paul. Spain fear, ct wi- e of zonirq from C-2 to R-5/0-ic)
+G Nnff3f'mim— l'-lousing, on portions. of I i- :#_At s l a !, R. Crowley `>irvey, A-31.2
-, C t 6, 5. Tucker �uiry y, A-1512, l ic Led e�st. of Fuller-Wiser nc a i)rtoi i
Roafl, west of Airport. Property, and north of WHe rear Creek
IV. PL-1131..1E: HEAR11,.1Cz
Z.C. >E38 - Request of Steve McC all:_m for change of zoninq from. f'-! to f=.
W.TJ3,:t for 'ommhc?ines on Tram, 2�'\3, MA,A, 3 & 3f?, J. P. 1- alford Survey, .H-
ill, located east of H n es Drive, uv+e A of t forth Main Street, north of S.H. 183
and smith of Midway Drive.
Z.--1.'.1. - Request of Glen .--fin ley for change 70:1i#-icl frorT? R to C-2 and
R-5 on Tracts 20 3i1, 4i3, 2, 3. & 4, l3. Harn#i"3c tore Sui-vey, Am808, at: l Tracts
4L.%, W & ';-;'l, Levi E aNdin. Survey, A-513, 10Er.:;=ted east of FM 15h west- of
3az Road, and sr:-nth of ._�lacla Road.
1983-016
Pla;ninq & Zoning %'orninission
February 1, 1983
CALL. TO ORDER
The rei]W r meeting of the Pla ;r1ing %K Zoning C orr-ir-6--sion was called to E>1'dei• at `i
p-rin. iri tie C�Duncil t..'.€"i"ctrnbers of the Euless City Hall by Cha-irrnan oh:' Dei°.1?Inff.
tv R I-' 2 R)�BE E' , rBSE NT
J ;NI Delt€sluff Robert i`ltr:Mi;lon
Bob Williamman ?am Cotten
Jam Lynch
E\i Fna ECliriYC?ri
Carl Tyson
Jar—"ies €`r.-ght, City Engineer
Becky E.ul1, Development Co ruit??f".or
Rod Tyler, •:eniof- Pl inner
VISITORS
OR
B. ft. Heath
Willie Mae McC.orr-nicl/
-Lei4_th C. Chu
Helen Li ;l?U.'ta ly
R,--in Haynes
CEen 1 inkley
1201 Harris
Keith WaHace
jack Re;rner
The ;�ivocat un was given by Mir. C8I'l Tyson.
The cninute�;of I.he "egi.ilar ,nee.tinq oated .,i ?nuary If , 1983, L+J:.sre :iF1E2rf:tved v ith the
follr3winq corrections-
it`1 N 7 ! r, s �•- follows:
:;d,iit3: r� of- a r?c��;. paragraph �: on 1_.age � as I. flows:
A lengthy di5'.'i.is`: un Wr3`dv'ed concernino., land lipe in the are -, �,?_irI'fti.ndirig the
;J'f--je :'f:. s --:t' :r t.E7f r'Ct.i( �: clif,'S 'serving `E'te af-ea: hiS�'prical !E�S'E'.:L?(:2F?".ent of
the area, etc.
l-f<,ecio Twn - �-'l% nning &_ orilon Coo-ni-mission, - er ry 11... 993 1983-01 i
(2 Deletion. of the words "after discussio.,,." to "u--rent paragraph 0 an tip,ge 6.
C
CONSIDER 3->1__ATT.ii` tC;', - PRELIMINARY & l".N,NL PLr l I II`' G OF ;"1R£;ORS E_.t' l,;_lLE S
�^ '-' e 3 4 f ^ .. -°r r
}l--;l-�rJf._. II, F.,)e - F f::.L-.� 3`�:�)s'1 1 f S t1F f; Ri %, ��V DR1L�:.., 2..!��'J � {-.i 3:' 1.1 f-_L!E I-
..
-, 'l f3.�1F..f�, t'\�._i i•Al
FAY. Keith Wallace, CbmiltAng Engineer, presented the request fur the Pre rt{ �ry $
Final PI—itting of .Arbors "f Eutess - Phas.e .II.
Chairman '::)E-:ithlaff asked M,:. ld,,Iallace if he had imceived the letter dated .January 28,
198 3, fron-F Rod Tyler.
Ad" Wallace statod that he, had received letters Ietr both Phan... 11 and l-'h ise III and that
they were in full agreen~ent with l.he C Eli"F?i"F"3 :rit.5 in both lc,t.ter,.
41. t-.yneh had a question regarding the drair"fage referenced in Itern i'NI of the letter.
N1. Knight sLat.e£. that as iung as the drainage is suNe£'t t. i`/lr. Wallace's c£Hi"p i ance with
ordinance r{qui.re-ments of the City, it will be adequate. Ile further stated that N4.
°dcNac e had �€icat:ed he ..cas additic nal information ^can e ning th£, c)nst:ruction drawings 3
that have not been r :vlsewe'd lby st eft.
t lr. ':<n {�11t , 1:e� f�cfirtted £ Eit. tPf<'at P�1r. °J:ill ,c, tinfill ii�.c c, too corn-. ,-.it;� all of the
replatting re._ltiirements of the Subdivision Or €inarwe rather t€":an U-se l?1.at bi- ir"g considlered
as a )re."i-minary & fits€;, plal-
NO lh UHamson made a moticxi t.o recon-m-tend approval of the reel ttinq of a portion of
l%tid; ay Square - Woe III; subject to Rod Tyler`s let.ter dated. .Janua.ry 28, 1983.
Mr. Lynch seconded the mot..i?n, and the vote is as follows.
Ayes: Mrs. Runyon and Messrs. Williarnsnn, Lynch" Deithlo f, and'
None
l:hai;`:':"sari Doithloff declared the :notion cr;rrieel.
I I.
C,'G"--1S!JER €IL A l..l I,"-l .a - PRELIMINARY c,: FT-JAL PL ,T_ TING ,.?r /-^f BOf'>
. NOI n , 1 o f i E. V _ • ._V S r sl ; . II; ) 1TE3 1 �
Nt:lWN ANEs SC:,.JT€--€ OE l It<'�,%f £' � �I�%t :_
Mr. Keith Wallace, Conr:.tl tint Engineer, presented the request fior .:i Arbors, of
Ewers - Phase LII.
It was also noted that. NA.r. Wallace will have to e,era"Ay :;: h W! of the replatting
r}-gWromenU on ON Wat-.
Paue Three - Plan!r!;.r.!i, & Z ruary 1, 1983 0 1,r3
.-n 'In 1983
fvl •, Williarnson m, -6e a rnotion to reron-irnend ap-prr.wal of the replatting of a pior;,,�-.mon
NAdw,--iy Aldclition - Phase 111, subje ,.t to Rod Tyler's letter dated Jan.--i,-ry 28� 1983.
W. Ru,,1.yof3 seconded the motion, and the vote is as Mows:
Ayes. Mrs. Runyan and Messrs. Lynch, DeAbdoff, and Tyson
flays: None
Deit-1-i-i-off declared Lhe motmn
SPAIN CHANGE
J, HD\RING - ZONING CASE #386 REQUE�---T Ol"
OF- ?0f-,l.l1%--j(-1 OR CONIF--ORMING HOUSIN(I. ;'.-Jl`•J PORTIOI-JS C.-)F'
2, It. CROWLEY SURVEY AN[.-) A P0RTI0---J C--.F TRA?;T..6;.-'--;.
1--bEAT �.-.ws T...... F t.-f---- .5 E R IR OA—D, E S T
�,URVEY, P�
AIRPC1l-":Z'f- PROPEF-M", TH. OF E,AR CREEK
....I..........-------------------------
Chairrna!-1 L"eith"'off op�.,ned the public hearing and explained that. the pruponen,-,,- wo;Jd be
heard foot and then the opponents.
Paiul Spain of Terra Inter,-,--itional stated ,Pat in the nee�d Ors<xt.y i60)
ac-res -of Corn.rnereial zonifiq of the north their project. near the
of Cheek Sparger Road and State Highway 360, it w,fs found to be unlikely ,,-haf all -�if
it could be developed as They are prop-osin.g. to leave twelve. 02; airres zoned
C-2 an,,J recluc--tsting that W55 acres lbe rezoned to R-5 1-vith 001-'), for Confori-ning 1-10i16ri.,.-j.
The S-�---,,rnaining J.5 acre Lz wil.1 '-,e taken up by the Qhoof—a--Iyc, -,! Cheek Sparger Road and
S --it., 4 - -iway 360. The overaH net density for the area nroth of the creek "Wd be
L, ,? Hiql-
approanately 16.5 units to Lhe acrm
Chair-nan Deithlo"f asked if there were any additionn, prnpoonerits. There being none,
w
mked for any opponents,
-Mr. Dort wii.th the D-FW Airport Plarwdrig 01 Engineering Departmenit stored that
they are piimarfly appposed because the property is Ocated. .n. I'Anise Zone "B" which
cor,.-s;d(--,red not suMe Or residential use. tie stated that C•2 is a SUjtab1(-,, Ll (,. 1-1e al-SO
pointed 'u'.1-it, J-sere is --I pro;used 2,0`01f, foot STOL planned tx) Lh.e north of Letts
property.
lair, Tycmin ask I vit --�e inter,-�e�ct.ioi-i of
.e-,-J, iat, the Current plans arr- for State !--fiqhway 360 at
Cheek Sparger Road.
Mr. 1- E,--.ath, also f the D-F-\,',1 Airport Planning %y E)epartment, �:LaLed that the
ai,rport. ha, dedicated right-of-Way to th'-, State Highway fit in the sear} -elover
leaf -iq
Mr. sAated that the original plan of the • ghwny ",Depaftmemit c.�-.ffled for a sefni-
clover leaf. He stated that, ,,hey are working with the State Hiighiw y for is
sir -ple duet-iond hiterchange Wtead.
Pane Thwee - Planniry & I'M ' Man - Febrimry L 1983 1983-018(a)
................... .............................-
Kh. INHHamson made a motion U, recommsend of the replatLii--ig of a porlii--in of
✓Idway Square Addition - Phase III, subject to FAW 'Tyler's letter dated January 28, 19113.
vote is ,-is
Mrs. Runyon seconded ttw, motion, arid the
-ilof ,F, -id, Ty,on
Ayes: Mrs. Runyon and Messrs. WHlieumon Ly, ,h, f-')eit-I i s
lWays: Wne
Wairman [_)eithIc,,ff deciawe-d *,,--he -mr-tion carriEd.
OUBLIC HEAFRi#',IC-' ZC.)NHqG CASE #386 REGUEST OF PAUL S •AIrl-I FOR, Cl-IAN�'_1E.
70" - ----
FFZC;III:l TO R-5/01-j[D �-TrR
ON P0,RJU�- ..-Y
SUIRVEY A 12 AND A PkDR"TION: -OF- TR ACT-----------------r L.......
si_3 'WE,......
T,,' _[� OF E QAT
AIRPORT 6 J LIT TLIE-1.3-E AF-'............ ......... .................
Ch,.irmnn I'Deit.h1off )peer-,ed the rmblic heahng and explained that the prf.;I-��onent�; v,"CiAd be
heard 0s; and then the opponents.
NK Qih Spain of Terra International stated tih,�,,'-, in reviewing the need for sixty %0)
a1c.r.es of co-m-mercial zoning on: the north of their project-. near the j_-woposed intersection
ol S3parue, Row.1 and
Highway 360, it was fiw.,ind te be that a"i of
it could tm.- developed as Commercial. are proposing to leave twelve 02) acres zoneo
C-• and recpiestingl that 36.55 cores be rezoned vviti-i Cl D for (',onforrning ld-,-,us i ng.
The ren-t ainini-r-, 11.5 ac es will be taxen up uy the rigiht-of-w�ays of Che,,k Spa-yer Riciad -Inidl
Si.-ate Highway 360. The overall neL density far the area north of the- creek be
-n, He al_, o stated that these plans Woded
appromr Aply J0.5 !-inks to the acre. 4
construction of Cheek Sparger Road thmqh Vis project and across Ai_-port Property
connecting to West ;Mrport Efive so that his development could make use of the Beaj-
Creek Racquef. Club.
Chairrnan [)eithloff if there were any addk.Ji_,,n,,al propone�rits. Ther, beii-iij nori,, he
asked for uny oppone-nits,
Mir. Don I-Iarris with the ED-F*vV Airport Planning e, Engineering Dc-partm,�.,.nt stated that
tKy are primardy oppposed because the property is located In Noise Zi_-,ne "B" which. is
cc.nsidered- not, suitable for residential use. Pic stated that C•2 is a suitable men Fie also
poised out that there is a proposed 2Q00 foot STOL runwwy plinned to the of this,
property.
tvlr. Tyson asked what ,-he current pl,,nn aro for 5tate Hiqh.,,vay _300, at the of
(Cheek Sparger Road.
Mr. Heath, also of thic, D-FV,' Airport Punning & Fngii-ii.ee-ing Department, U.-.at thiie
airp�-.Irt has dedicated right-of-way to the State H
iqh.W,.IY .'Departmerit in the serni-clover
leaf MnhgUraLiori.
Spain stated that the original plait of t.€`e Highvvay Departrnent c2illed f,)j- , sen-ii-
W it -le .5t, Hig n,, Del -ne f
1:�Iover leaf. i � stood Not My ;we Workif 1) a t ihw, . i_ -,., rLi 2-A or �I
si.--np-ie. diamond inte.-ch..-Inge instead.
P ()q-
Qgy Four - Plan.f)j )CI & Zonin. C`ornfi%. ion - February 4 Q3 198 -0!9 3
............................ ....
Mr. Heath referred the Cornrnission to the letter frofy-i Jack Do wriey of D-J-W Airplort,
di--ited 28, 1983.
There being no additional npponenti, Chwrniair; Doithlo-If closed public -hearing.
Mr. Lynch rioted thaL i-;7 the HgI,,L-,)f-wPy of Lhe� intersect �-�tays -.is planned *-,y thk:-!
i-Ii.,jhway D elTnrtnient, there will not be fT,.uch of the twedve (12) acres o-F C-2 NFL
W. Tyson fAt that it vjothd toe rnore valuabip to thic., to the properf-y
cornivercial QUI,.. the j,ight-of-way a�, [danned, fie asked Mr. Spain what their
thretable is.
NIr. pain ;fated thaL they plari to rn-ove dirt on, the. south side of the creek within tvic
to Lhi'e', -1
weeks. They MH begin ori north 5ide, of Hine creek In two bo three years,
Mr. Tyson stoted that there is no v,:,hicle in the Zoning Olrdinan ,e to insure that th,-!
tweNe (12) acmes to the northea,-.t wo!Ad be insmved for He -ssury'sed than
if the reallgmnenL was not changed the se-r-ni.-Clover leaf ait the tir,�e i:7,-f platLing, !�he
pl,it. could be rejected.
N'Ir. Ki-6--ghl, stated -hat it Uhe devieleper With the req-uirei-ncrits of the
CIrdinance far, piait.ting, zoning is not a Valid re"-.1son, to reject the Plat,
the Cylestion of We right.-of-way of Woure MI. 3,,"-,0. Kniql-,11. stated that
-f will t -t,- - thf -,d riq� - ---�t. t,h� -ne
.3 f ,I try to if -, � at. the deveiaper re.-,2e, 2s rf--�quirc ht-o F-way , -, tii
of of Whatever type of interchange the State FIghway Departnient detcrrnines is
at Unal, tirne.
After od0tional regarding the fNopose--d right-of-way, I'A.-r. Tyson rniarie
to reeomgnend approval of Zo-ninq Case .1,,386 with the stipulvaion that the developer
exc-'.C'ut-i a navkjation easerne .t,
TO rnotion died for lack of a second.
Became the righVokamy has not been teed dok,.,,n, Mr. n-iade a -nf.-.-fion to
df 'e fl.58
of Zor-iin,.-j, 6
PvI •s. Runvon seconded the motion.
Afte,r continued discussi.an, the vote is as follows-.
Ayes: Mrs. Rurryon Lynch, and
Nays. Mr.
Chairrnan Delthloff declared the motion
'"'ctE_t, Fou.-' €`�lianni-i£ & LJ.of inq ..or( iiii<.;'�i£1(-( _ (�f�:,(°EactT" ? 3u 1`i5-, 0ifs,E!,
..
. v
_,l'i%1;.."i-?;<'1<i DeRhou regmsted that €.ilf. letter be 1T"laCi£'. <; )=:1Il of ?:;,., f"nlE'ltiti. <
M . l--k ,ath referred the Commission to the letter hum Jack E_)C.3t^iney of D•-FW Airport.
dated jan,_ary 28, 1983.
There being no additional Ch irm,--i-1 t..)e.ithlof"€ o;.osed Lhe pl.il:ilii.: hearing,
tAiI•. Lynch note,! that if the r"?( ht-ol-t^ay of the (1"!1.(`rse:;tir.,i n st,iv:i :E i planwed by the
-iigh wa i epc r,.rf"(c;W, Y.f....,e 'wi l not he "n."Ac h .,-;( the "'Ji.-lve, ;12? acres ofC,-2. left.
Mr, T sion lelt that it would be more valuable to the developer to leave the prop ,-ty as
with the E'',\st'.-i'j right-of.-Way aI, €11E1n ed. He i.5E!ed what their
tirneLablte is.
Mr. Spain stated that they plan to move dirt. on the south Side of the crt-,ek within, two
to `ltrs?s °Jetst4�. ,C",� v:ili c t?lFI E>iE ttiE' 1lEJrtl'i Si£'.•£' of t.l-te c-f-ec,:k in two to thn=ise Years.
Mr. Tyson stated that `:here is no 'vehicle in the Zoriir?g Ordinance to in,_ure t:t:rt the
twelve ,12,1 acres to the northeast wE}i.dd be m'—„ '.'L'ed for cornmerE_:ial. -Ie £l isun-?ed tl-mt
if the i.e afignrr.ent was not .-Awainged tr•:�rrt the s"r;"EAlover leaf at the tirne of rl att ig, they
Knight st. ite£1 t, at. if the developer cola:plies vJith the rr,quivernents of the UIL”di.,"ision
Cr inance for plattirq, cc,nhig is melt a v and rep som to reject tfie plat.
.ec g af,ding `he- question of t_'le right-of-way of Future S.K 360, Per•. >!::ig!-it. st tted that
staff s^f_11 try to i?"iniFe that the dove oiler rp£ serves the r£equi f--"d right.--of••vvuy i^t the .Erne,
i €,iatting of ;n.E..itever tvpe of intei'ChangL the ;jute. €-licI-way Deepartrnent is
necessary at `hat time.
After w1dition al tliSC }.; 5' it regarding t.ly proposed right.-of vd' y, IMr. Tyson r,�ce a motion
to .i'f.'£'o wllend approval proval o Zoning (lase 0386 with the stip i1,1tion that the 1E= :'elf_,!Per
s3xe,c£it:e flaligatiori easf:mi£'ent..
The n"it'lt1Cs^ <, SeCC(t£:.
:`. E'C`,8l-1 ite the rig;:t-ii i 9.%ii j% has not v£'£`r :i£ff ; t vr't.:
of� '€r. 1-.' h si 'n ".ic,ri to
recorrifiiend deniai of t onii _.rise 1'3,1;'6.
-'1lrs. Runyon secondled the ritr,tinn
Aft`-r contin,-,_ied disco !;io , the 'tot:, is as fi lrtvt
,eves: Mrs. Runyan and Mess s. Lynch, willmnisori and Deitfil.nff
a ys.
C.:ii lir~n in Deithloff declared the motion carried.
sage Five Planning.annrn 0C 7 i COCTiFrYr:i rC:ff^^ bI;tfiiF"y ly^ ('N 1983-020
FV.
:=LJBLli` t--lE AF Rt *G, RE Q4UES,T :"Y' S T EL..T:: F;^:f'CCL1 ► :PA #=-t:)? OF '£.;,Nfl`_-'.<C_
.:. r""'•:l�i�ll I�--# i .� �"yTiL�t#_. �-�Jt"\ i 4, 3 _.i ON"• -i N _ ff _2_. .3'_, � LSy�.J- P< a i
- t� E7tly. �'3 t (, t ('' i-i.? € :"�E- {�37{�fl I:: ^f.'l l..`.>.1 ..t'y �'��_, \ #F., 'i'�1N
��f•c.Si.#� C){-`..tJ t�#-.�E .Y� 'i r�. .i#v ..1.f 1.,,�_? l :,.L1 � f 311�7 f�� l .6'E_.p �1'� i,��+ 'i s J�.
r
>TH
f, ..... ENE) C:....3T .. Cf= ' #tfv;i'`TA4" t?F tLfF:
Chairman L)eithlo • opened tt-it, pubHe heating and explainer-1. that the, proponents wo..ld tote
heard NO and then the opponents.
Mir. Leigh, Chit With C_;a.rte^ '� Burgess Engineer's ?resented the r '# 1 ;:.,. for t{i! rezoning
rl
"ehflf of Better Wing Corporation Minh would all aw the CI£aflStPuedon of townhefEoF_'s,
He _sated t. .- }. I-ir-s t-if:it .rf-..ei'` ed the? le.tt.ei' fr.aFi� .#8n�,'S i fC; eL %inCtc3rb' "i, 1. 8 "E
l.}'i "ht £�cE% f �,
;eq:f? •ltl"ig tEt , at,i<:i£.'.,. i_? mE'r"in trpfY} lay l t :ilfrl'Ei'rp Tr`:t:1f v%a!" ;tV t-.ft: i'uifl3t.£31" he stated
t'w had no objection to We single tfl" ..lEersect On We?ad o f t£, rul-.„t e ;1e. at the E:f?d
of Byers Avenue.
Mr. Heil Y an's i�.E�'rnu :�fa. ES i t there could of :iOF?:F; t.a'raTtr.C'. i i>. � ;ng e
s t- ghat. th F.r:;t.terr: #s1' #} �:' � Pk
eul-de-sac at the end of Byers Avenue.
Mr. ':night sr.ggeaed Wt the intense.-tion be handled . t. the tirtle of platting.
Mr. :r"i ,..:1<e'.. Mr. Chu if he arcs ;.eaokeu Into alignhq be private drive to North Mras.r,
`it.reet vfith Town
Nlr. ;'{-ii,, stated t:ts:"at, they have the pr,_,perty on cont.r^r~t., t_,:,t: putting ;:k drive through, ti-,e
;i-iW±..le would rer;rler the pf,operty useless as car-nner£:iFa# .property .
::;hrairrnan Deit.hloff asked if there were any addition.-ail proponents,
. E.1r f'fall?tr f.:xrarne>a' t•c':pre> :e.::t.. g Air;?art Free w,,:., Cht.irE-tt of C7hri >t., ;t tc-,od that� they
,-
riat opposed to the zoning change. They ere only ot'fle?sed to making Byers Avenue a
private drive and Clel not ?!'Jcti"Et to be assessed for <:(i:1,` ininE3r'tr v rC`E'i}.:, on Avenue.
":r:e.
:.,ttc`ti?`FT'E:3F? t_?eithIaff s€:%3i:ed tha`-at, Byers Avenue is currently a pt.tbW street: and would
ld
remak as such.
k"ir, t\ni£ h€-. stated that the :'}eiht°O€•-wa; for avers Avenue is Were .ntl that the street is
not Unproved t c f en t standards. Fie r ;cc rrr =- 1 e� t~at r te street. he d :;e
lags t o 311.
few.- bank to back of curb and EatabW improvements be put. irk.
Cl�., ,irmarT #: eitt3l£3f asked if there were any opponents -there being .,-one>, he, _!osed the
IN Tyson stated that he felt the proposed zoning was a rood use for the pro ert:q
lTt3V•fe':e he had a pC'oWe.`m 'JVJtin the, 'jE'ei) (t gF'l,:S o-into Ma_n :3t..ree..
N"Irs. ht"anyc-n rnade Fa motion to 1;e;C'{l;Ymend approval of Zoning £.-as t,7388, s£.fi ect to
arn(--,$ t�tlrgt-it t letter ter e ja }el ;r y �> C"83 r t-- 's 1 ,c
s dated l :r r i t 1. ;ncl TFL' �fttF^•cti" approval tl c;E it inure: .,
ivIr. t_.yi-ch seconded the motion, a.{"d the vote K as f0lowse
Noe Six - Rannky ✓ An! F,
y
Februar 1, 198-1 1983-021
..............z
Ayem !'Ars. Runyon and Messrs. Deithloff, Wi.Jiairmon, Lyne-h ei Ty-- on
Nays: Nonf-;
Chaim?ian I de c .-
clared the motion aried.
he P&Z 13ornmission took a WAR, break Won) 9-00 p.rn to 9:0-5 p.rn.)
V.
FUBLIC HEAARNG - ZONNG� CASF #--5G,9 - REQUEST OF CGLEP,-.f HI-,'.I--"A<L-EY FO)iR
Ff ... Tc..' ... ......i-'k f',JD 'R-5----(.-)N TRAJ .....48 —2-3
HATTM—Nc,1.70f.'i ( )-RVIETY"-A-', —zT:
..........�L--
-..,.,..:..31 L(.)C--A----T----E-----')-— '.3t
--------F- ,-M.
OF BA--Z---E---
- .......-—-------------
Deitht off opE ned the puWic hearing and explJ.ned that propor�- nts wou'll-d be
heard hirst and then the opponents.
"Ier) I
one of the owners, [Hosenled the requesL r rez nirig fron-I R-I Lo C-
2 aind R-5, fr-ie requested tL7iwt tra,:Ati 4 e� 7 frontirig along F.f,/,,. '1571 be to C-
2. He is requesting FRO multi-family an tracts 2, 5 el (Ei. -.in thu western side of the TFI&L
power Wes and Tracts 3 & 6 an the eastern side of the? power lines.
F'eithloff, asked if there were any addhional imapanents.
-ios Clow Develaynent stated that he f eIL the request was
Mr. Ror, Ha,,--� wah
c o m i s,-en
it with zoning 'In.d. L -ffef'inq.
tBeing no --.pp,--,nent.s, ('ham. an --i-Deithloff c.'-',ased the plibli • heaf-ing.
Min Lynch stated that he did not-. see a Problern with and
in that how...,,ver, he felt the R-5 eE city is ton high.
-)ble
Chai-ria- r.- Deitl-Oaff stated that. tie also thougnt. d-i-r., [-'.--2 was, good, but. had on, --rn. with
the f•- --5 dr--msity.
Mr. Lynch stated that of between N & 24 WE. an ',ite.-re nniqhL b,,-,
a (--'LJE) or IDD would permit smnething likt, this, but. not straight zoning.
Mr. 'Tyson stated that they had received some 4--;gat inpi,it fhi�3. city,
Attorney had notified staff Uhs afternoon that a note, sueh as the following, could W
impose�--1 On the plat.
'11-5 fArdti-Ranily Zoning (71assificaHon (TI u/a) -for Tract.. 2� 3, 5, 6, & 8 with
Permanent r-'suriction of no more- Lhan units per acre on Tract., _3
& 6 An posed My the Planrii"iq EOMMIssion and the Euless City (-'-'Ouncili
hy zor'-ny, 01rdinance a t e 01,
...........
is inirm.--m-i Deithloff ._stated he not sure they could just air-bit.rarily pick a for
the density, .;inee the Zoning Adinance is not strucLu-rer-` H-lat way. Howevcr, W-,
does; have use of a designa.-ed multi-farnily ;zo,-,i,,ig d"istrict such R-4.
Co
F aqe Seven Z.orung F�,-'-)J.uary 1. 193.3 1983-022
.......—-—------
Mr. Knight stated that this would be .,such cleaner Rom an enf-oircer-nent stan, poir-..L fcir
'City Staff. Fie ".7orther stated he did not know Al the ram i fic".1tions of into
if , -s
eri fore cone nt of deed restrictions on beha, of the City. He j.-)ei ionallly f>rt ferredi riot to
be in that position.
Nlr. HinMey stated he cotAd accepL 22 u/a on Tract 2, 5 c'< 8 and 19 u/n or,, Tracts 3 Cx
6.
M Lynch stated that he was not sure what ramifications there would :.,e by Sett in,,j
precedent of placing restHetions, on straighil, znninig.
Mr. WHIMmson stated he had a with VA-4-1/2 density, which baslcally' is is
being When this cone, a precedent is being -set -.for- aH the adjacent pf,;,Jpe�rty.
KI& Minyon stated that the density is stHI I-Agh even with the rccluctions.
Chairman Deithloff stated that he Weterrer-1111 R-- on Ti,acts 22, 5 ek 8 and R• 3 an Tractz,
& r:. €--Ie also thoaht th.,.it, the City Attorney needed to liook inui this new vehicle fm_--re
closely,
MIr. Hinkley sugcjested that the zonic-q request 11-he tahled.
'Ar. WiIIi,:I.iIqrDn stag-,d th�,t fie did not fei-I *hat_ stela;in., th? zoning casp would chanoie
the -decision.
NN. Tyson stated that lie toad no proble-im with, the City decision.
--c�t -i, Mr. Tyson a rnotion to re c nri-irni-rid �-_ipprov-�fl of Zoning
Aftef, (Jitional dis _issioi
Case #389 with Tracts 4 5 & 8 being rest6ned to 22 uQ and Yacts 3 to 6 being,
restricted to 19 UK
The -mc..tion died for of a
t'/Ir. WiMarnson read e a r-notiori to rec •mmier-d denial of oning Case #389.
The motion, died for lack of a second.
NK Tyson remade his c)rigina rn.otior,! which also died for lack of a secoi-id.
After further discusisoth Mr. Tyson made a motion to ri---con-irnen-d approva" Z-�Dning
UB9 Mth R-5 nuAti-family zoning classification (24 u/a) for Tracts 2, 5 and 8, mith
penwwwnt restriction of no more than 22 units per acre impo.ed by Uhc' P&.Z Coi-nirni-ssion
�a ..d-. ,
Tracts 3 & 6 restricted to ;V4 multi-farnily zoning 1(3 Urlit3 to th�'� @CTe.
Mrs Runyon seconded the a--.,_-iUoo, anti the -,,(ote is as follows:
Ayes: Mrs. 1-`',unyon & Nlessr'_-;. Tyson & Lynch
hlay - NIessf,s. 'vViiiiar-nson e'�< "Deithloff
Chairrn-an Deithjoff declared Lhe motion carried.
Pa..,,e Eic:ht - Planninl Connmi ion - ebr 1!981 1`83 UO2D
S {'
i 3f '
1.
There being no furthej- husiness to condu&, the rneelAng acho jrned at 10:15
� a