Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-04-05 1983-059 AGENDA P la r.-n i n g f.T. Z o n c, -Con-m-iission 201 N. Ector Drive Men, Texa.-s April 5, 1983 505 pm - 6:30 p.m. Pre Comi-nissinn: to Discus.: 6.30 p.rn. - 7.3-0, kleeting to -,,Disciuss Agienda. lien-is RVOiCATION A�:11PROV,A."L. CJF 1VYWJTE.5 -- Regulm- 1,1.c-,eLing I-)ated March 1115, I. C(.,N SIDE--*R PL.ATT.r"JC.--.',, C�m-,.hined Prelimina•y & Final Pkitting r)f Park Addition, try,-,,.Aed went & adjacent to Westpark Way and sciut.h or Tibbets Drive. COr---ISIDER PLAT '.."ING F-in, t h e Dec',1catio.n.- of Villagi-! F)rivc, and A-eilllh .41 Platt.ing rif R i Lan—. in the i-irnit:3 of th , City of Euless, located coast and adjacent, to iiuller-Wisei- Road, and wes,- & adjacent to Airpol't Propc-,rty. I.F.I. C.-,ONSTDIER PLATTING Fij-1al Platting of Add&ion-Second InsLallment, Lot 3, Flock 3. (Aspen Oaks), located mrLh & adjaccont b-3 Ash Lane and era�.-,, of IF'.M. 157, IV. CONSIDER PLATTING Pl,-Itting of t3ear Cle• k Adidilion. Iocp ed smit.h, Hiarwood Road, north of East Denton Drive, Yve3t oi- ,nd ea it of North. Main Street. V. CONSIDER R.-ATTJN(---,3 F inal Ratting of Bear Creek Villas Addition-Phase F., located souW of —inrmood, Ro'ed., of East DerRon Drive, west of Riead east. of North fvk-,in itreet. VI. PUBLIC HEARING iiiC7,!,: r' Mc hard � 1 change o zoning g front °. L_.C.. i�_ - t�f-; 'Li > t of r`. I-i's,rd TY:':C'^SS �f" �f.'�?'3�'' � t �e;� to PE for 0--lot We dwellings on a portion of Tract W, M. Crawley _;a-ir e ', A-320, located east t•. adjacent, to North �lIhaiin Street, west of the �d oc.£i�r.'Clds Add'ii: on and north of f+sh ..--iiie. VII. RUBLIC HEARING Z.C. #39S> - Rc liaest of N, ?cy Way Nr change of zoning from R-1 to C.. & R--'-i on Traits IAIA & 1AM, E. T,,.y.lo!- a.fr•.-ey, .A--1550, located sE"fiAh of Glade Road, east of North Main Street, north of C:ira>-aounon kidgr-> Addition and wes'i. of F -!Ilea-Wiser Rnz,.-O. .-'III. PUBLIC 1---IE AR,ING =. 1/399 - Request of Don F1rM3 for change of zoning .=•cam L-I to F0 5 or., a, portion of Trncts; 4E & 4C.I. Levi Frank.,,, .°`urve,,,', located east & adjacent to W. 157 and west, of ter>ar• Cree< PUBLIC I IN Z.C. -- Request of Troy Ft.;ller for chanige of zoning fron-i R-1 to f C. .? on Tract 1C, E. Survey, a-155% located south <ti ad ycent. to Glade Road, east & adjacent to Nrart'. kll ain Street. and Corgi. of C.r£lnart'toCi Ridge .Wdit£on. X. RESOLUTION Requesting init_i,afbn of a C-(1 dti-family zmAng district liraiited to ., ma\iCt'£urn density (if 20 units to the acre. R',(-,ular Meeting Planning a: L.nninJ CoE"'rimi;;3ion +1prH 5, 1983 C04..f.. TO ORDER The i'r;gWar i`i'3:,eHng of the Pl<-jnning & Zoning C ii"nnni;3:semr, v,,as called to :Ji'CiLt at :30 .m. in .:fit, Council Cha.-rihers of Euless City Hall by Chairman john Deitl to f. MEiA---EF?f & STAFF PRESENT NE�'B..-.f�� %�t�:if::.€'fr JoK Deithloff Bob `v'1lla:amson John Ly-rch 1\orma Runyon Robert N/Ic`:fillon Sma Cotten Carl Tyson Ja<r:t;s Knighit, City Engineer ,kcky Neal'•, €-;evelc3;iment Coor mater Rod i yler,,`.Senior Elan.-ner VISITORS i°s`F€'r-en Baethge f<f th i"• W!:ac'c: Dtanc ?n R- -igsd 3_l E: Mark Sheets D iW Peters Peter Sc. drka Rad Ashford James Harrison ison Sue Ferguson rguson Harold Copper B'ob Mulrr; y Russ Lynch -Jinn Ralph Smar;or Ron Johnson Timothy L£:'t/e^Sine Silly Fid t ar, l:irt.l? l homp<son Rust, Y'Ici.1E?2rman Numero-...::4 Concerned i.1::t.i zan . ?NVDf,-.'AT1 t-,l The SE1Vfs( lri'v'El vi as J?i%en by tvlr. RnIll ert: l'JICIV Mon.. 1:3 :R---)VAS Or-- ry f1�a{._jTE The n?inutes of lhc= recli.31._._ -neeting dated P/l<arc.. 1', M3, were approved as written. ;is:fie f wn - Pl<,i-"Eiiing & Zoning �.,o��i v:��{3 -April `�, 19R3, 1. ` 1--�A - PLATTING O t SDE# LATTINt: - �:^f D 3 _I.1 r � ' ? _ A€ 1 i < � �TES WEST iS_ €). 1 lit., Mr. Charles SAar£3es, MwAfinq l:.figheer, at.rd that they are in agr:=ernient, with, j;trne,. Kr'.-i}ht_ s letter £jc te:d Mar 'h :3J, .1983. On sated that this +_lr.vi lol?!? ent. is to he a conthivat:i:_n of a develops--.-cent: f,rop—,—,.,�ed in Redford, Mr. Ty50#3 ii-l'3,11dec if My hld control of the €=:ropr�rt.`Y to t1.,e i-ko—th, Mr. :/tarries stated t-.i?gat they do rrot have: cnnit_ro':. over the property 3:£)5h of the f.'.E'eek where the £trams}g LV#lt be required. He r#rtii,r stated that he is not aware if an agreement has t:f":F.: re,,,,ched with the adjar rit property o""'n'rs .3jn ,•: he 1 s not h e#-3 handling Jws cases solely by himself. [Ar. Knii.li.t .it.?i .'d Lhat the property; shows, a. st.ni"'m draw) that --Urls .rt?r?'? sch-:ry.10: i. ane .._rth alcEi the react lJro e.rt'� lines mJLh the grade. t.0 dr<_iii i-. t property �.€.. t (.. C. `ice :#'i3I) 'r'< �#? kf; t£y. inirriedi8tely north before it gets Mo the creek. A t_.etW of Clonsent or t_rainag. Eas£ rni3'iir. ,vould- be ne'ce sar i,efore the developer will },a allow.,,,,-] to do €'"t£: grading. This LbouJd be required prior to the execution .it Hie f.lt:;' c,'{3t"F;fC'r ctgr•'£'#"!erns. F-e' further st aNd that the developer wi l need, `o ackr?owlee_lg that. it wil be his respons#ti#pity to 3t3C.._:e that-. agrr,£;frient.. M M? ever-it: th it € e #- E_#r-abli::, to sef`i;re a t:t,i.(;. , he will have to cornn-i-it to wi:are`'t:r expense �:cq(.3iI'': k1r. l._.'vE-#ch made _. motion to recor-nmend approval of the Cori-it3{Cied Prelrrf:ri-ary & Final . 'lattkq (if Park Cen',.ral Addition #.s`. c`;C'C'r:}{`llikilce with the _.ity D :i#3E'.er's e..tt.er dat{.d N/larch 31, 1983. €'',ctv ill£)i: S( i r.,,nded the E'"ootloin, and the vote--` is as r-ollC)ws— A ie -'vje_,'::ssrs. ---'j:`.- €?, Df--,rt.€?io t JC,€ iit 3:3Ci, i_,rlti:E"33 °` Tyson Chai:<r:fin t)eit.h.loff declared the motion carried. IT. 1..P% l JNG .. AL_ Pl-F-,,TTING OF Tf---Ik:: �IE:�E;r ;tl _v`f;<\ DEDI P TIO ------- ------- Ci _._ 01-1,3vE .?''l._ . -THE O v f_I uITJ C'T' t_...�f.:li ll..D EAST i"1£'''+fD ADJACENT €-\CJ71,€, AF,'--E' WEST 7 r`• F €'✓'r, Kest h Wallace, �"� ISP33ii£.It.t�E4f stiff;=3:i;. Ct? ..,£s£'fSi:l'£.kq ...nL:tiiTE err, isat` d Vat, they are f]ascaHy in %i£.vee£71eii` v ith the City .._rginee,rt`..= 1.%_..'.ei' d8t.,d Nlarch 31'111, 1953. Wallace stated ` ?�t i , i. their #.rt> ttit 1 Ft this One to :3 t, in all the concrete ;'3a4'1#?ri C?'f t.hi-, stre.ets for the first phase. q c:', is a I tali; property sol-it€'k of the creek. Village C:'?ri',e mil_ be 1 feet h<,cKt.n-back (-if curb pavif<£.l. N31-i Lane .dill be a 60 foot: right- v,ay with two--24 foot lark's, of paving with 8 €fs foot rrie-;diafi, Page Three - Ra."ininig 6. Zop'ng C"ornrnission - ApW 5, 1"'83 1983-00 ............ ...... lWare addre.--,.sed k,nQh& letter WWI March .551, 198.35, statincj that the'... are redming the centerUne rodke of two curves on A& Lane from 955 ben as by tJ--,c, vision Ordinance, to approximately 500 feet. Fie stated that thEe proposed raNi are voell within Lhie ,Aandards of the Texas F)epartn-3ent arid are rnore suitable to the tepography. Sir. Cotten ask-,d iVIr. Wallace about comment #2 regardmg no turn lan':-.s prnposed for Ash Lane. 10" WaHace stated that they have provided led't turn I.-i-ne.s. off of A- sh, onto Vij,,ier and also on I-ane at tmact and Ash and oi-i Ash Lane at Village Evive. He stated that there warid not be any --,,teater �f a prol--ilem. i.f the. ..beet were eonstructed at 41 Net bacVto-back of curb without the rnedia-. the rest. i--if A-�ash Lane. Chairr-'-I'an [."eild-iloff asked when the Wky e.,-i;,ernents required in c-omrnei-it !-!3 wil, receive di-I by staff. 440 Wallace sta:-ed that Wey will be ready in a day or two, definitely Isefore goin-i to CRY COMICH. Re,egardinq cr--,-nment #4. Mr. WaHace stated that they sknpli nieqleet.ed bir.i take We in"orr-nation off the design and put it on Li,ie eng.--,-ee,ing He sU-,ted th,,-'a Mr. Knight n-mm has this info rn-tat-ion on a revised set off Mr, I!-..ru,,-jht, asked to what extent. tr.,--.' spread of water was limited in each direction, W Wallace stated that r-me Inne in eac.- direct-ion will kept dry. Mr. Knight .,--;tated U,,at he has not had a chance to verity- these cap aciNes, In refer- nce to coannent 45. Mr. W---.iIJ--ace 5t:,�--,ted ha no problen-i wit.h. Knight)s suggestRym regarding the dope .-if the ernbankmip-•-ts, Mr. Lynch stated that in the past U has been policy to reqtAre the right-of-way to be e.�:Jended'-' when Lhe to of the embankment extends beyond the ar wi--,ere he curb elevatmrm are maktAned to the line and the placed an a Knimum slope sc, it is totally taken care of on adjacent. properties. Vv'aflace stated that it, !s their ir-,-tention to have a 10 to 15 foot level parkwa-i He has with r.iri l3-1 or 7:1 slope '.:'Ind 5.1 frorn that point. l--ie stite-id th;_-t he wdl pi.it thi ion the en,.q i,wo ring plaim.-i. Nlr. Knight Mr. L'Jalln.-ce ;f he had a wit l,. e\tending the culverts to the face of the slopes. Sir. Wallace stated that he, would extend the milverts to wherever Mr. Knight requested. Mr. Tyson Mr, Wallace if to would put the detail an the plans, '41r. V'Vallace stated that he wouid. ouil €''lo,fEi"E rEi & Zoning �.,Ofrfilrrs:iion - April 5, 198' 1983-041i --------------- --------------------- `-----------------------------------------°-------- - — - ° .................. BP.caus? of the Me 'slC:tor involved in getting the plena " 3;reced by t,Uit3)f'row, for the City C;car.iftf:il ;Mend , -Mr•. -",,10-Aillon asked W!" Wallace if tabling .-he pint. would Mir. Walla----,-, stated that it v'•liil.ild cause: a very :.?.fi-. tantial rnoniie ar; problem. He felt, he could r"lai:e al! of the corrections required within. a dray. Mr, Kniyl-lt stated that i . it i!, the intent of to :ecc)fi)mier,d t-he le i:t for ctplilmal .u-Wec to these lterns being s:,r)frgAeted and reviewed prior to it be,.. ;`)lac'£`i. ()i. Yilr' ,�lY.y' f.?_?ir'i. it i�.0 O.fItl� 1i;, - c°on,r �?-:nded t.t-t 1¢. 1%�l'. Y�Jc.11�3^£; •�st8y ,,-t{:'r t,E-t e; rnee`i! 3 to discuss re,f.ti.i r't;.J changes. NO. l__.vnch inquired of tvlr. Kninight what i,;lnd of deadline tie needed to r vie,�w the plans. Mr. !<ri ht. ..cued that the ,Bar's would need to he turned l?; noon, torf-t rrruw to .1l..rJ•i S�.ri`fs-f¢;-.A "_:file.' '€OI- review. After additional diiiS t-I sion, Mr. C_;t-itten it:lade a ff;tltielf. '.n .recorf'£-fl£'nd appro-val of the Final of the l -1).LRS 7E:ch-cation r.-,f Village Drive mW Ash Lane WPM to the Uity Engi.?eer's ter dates' Nlarch 31, 1983q f-ind all rer�i_i:red c1.haTige e3ing corf'#:tleted and sE_1l=mit,te;d by f?C?on tomor°r: vv Or otherwise,, the plat will be` tabled unt.ii, the ilieet.rr-i;j of the and Zoning Commission. Mr. Lynch seconded the motion. and the vct:r is its follows: Ayes: Memo 1...-'r-ch, Deithloff, l�l. t lillctri, 1.ottc.rt c: Tyro) Ni,-r-,'s. None. : httif'iftefrl Deithloft det:larm! the; motion carried. 1II. FINP.L lei_ A;TIVC'_3 €.)l=- l-_.;^-.k<€WI,--1-)C) r L0T 34 •_:l...c)t.,K .>, � ' AIK #---0CA 1 ...1:' NOIR- l(--# <:c TO ASKI LANE AFAD EAST lw''lr. -..narles Starnes, 1200 Copeland o,--.a f , Arlington, r ep 'e S?:'•"i f No wick Investments, in the development of another phase of Asper, :\pav`'rl`c'nts, rfc"o—low edg ., i'C:C:eip'. of the City FYflgkwe;r`s letter trite:. March 3*1, 1993, and concui-- :r�ith the comments. t1hairmaf ?{;it,il.;tf asked 1vir. Knigl-rt .aow he would l i..,vs: if ..on.e of the items fne-'Aioned Ox- le _ifs; are €).;3i': . nnal3.lii_..-. vvitl-l. tsar, Kr-right: stated that the developer will be it.C.r.rred to -..Er; >' � pi an o :�� r.�it i it:e �:tr:..< r�r:_Efiirl{� 1..•r.ri •efore € wilding #ierfrlits are, .'ss;-led. lvir. Cotten fnade a modon to recoi meml approval st.?h ect. t. the C.--ity Engineer's letter oated March 31� 1`83. Mr. lv`lC'Kltc)n -seconded the motion, C-And the vote is as tOii.+ S'Ys: - Ayes: Messrs. Lym--!h, Deititluff, & In Njay s: None, (:'..airmart De:ithl rff declareel the motion carried. Page Five, - Pi.ariiriC ,-.nir � Aril 5, 1983 1963-04-15 .......................... ------------------ ---------- TV. C t Jl•'.1:;IDER t-J1_aT TTNi..i PRELIMINARY !:'€._F-:'l 1 li•''JG (;F BEAR C.`Ri-:_f._.C\ L'il_L_X'S 3�.�1'';. E"_+ "/ p•_i. t".�i.i k I i "lrr�i��!'�L1 i ? f\��E.i, i Vi?{" i F,F EA- s i l E J f 1.::V };?.{; :., Z`esE:.` l ;..� .. _ Y :C• E�E�C). l_) €�°J :1ST O NC.� T€ r\i�.�.�'''•� �, ?{.;.T . t iE Mr. Warren Baet`,f e, of 1"€ei'£ an. €:>i;-mn Engineers, prese ited the :'£equeat. for Pre:i£iiiiiar)% Platting of Briar Creek W.-Ilan and stat:£`d that he had received On CIQ ...ilgWee:r4 let.tes• dated "Aar„1-} 3J, 198.5. -sir. l,,nch ?-iaue .0tio'. tr r s-it r e -iy letter , r c� : ,i ? at.e . March 31, 1983. M:. Cotten ?recon;e£l the mat.icmq and the We 5 as follows: Ayes; Messrs. Lynch.h. €:.)eithlof ,f, McMillan, Cotten & Ty cm Nr,i ys: None ..hairrri in E r(-,i hloFf declared the motion carried. V, C:01,ISIL1E-?. R__ATTINGt - Fl,`-J L. WATTING F f"SC:A :REE;< VI`€_AS A iFDI IC)".J_ �a C/-\TE 7 _ C , Nr i 1 { CAE :: 1 T DE NIT ^f 1, ...E:� �`.�t)T { t�: 1..1�1 �t'`lt.)tJl� f:f:� D 1,Ea 4F .i ! r )_L% \ 'i4 >> ; ROAD .) - .-i7 Y � f \•' ;V ..) I - NIm Warren 1-?aet- .e. of Heri-i-ia£i E31:im Engineers, presented the Ae^i.lt:st for Final {,.tting of Be;-- Creek Villas-Phase I and sLated that he rec i;ed t-he .,.r Engineer`: letter daLed March 31, 1983. Chairman 1..)eithlof'f ask,,d Mr. BaF'.t.h£li? to comment c.n the ext. the 24" water main rmynt.ioned in the letter. M,:% 3e t:€ is_; st atei* that t. lf-.�."V :i:'tve agreed Lo extend the t^,ester main as, requested. They have prepared estimates of the cost; dif frerenUal between ciri. 8” ai id -,in 2-, " +:later rn e W. Mr. Tyson asked if Mr. 'Baethge was K agreeifl:orM Wth es^rnwinq funds f£3r .Ilarwood- Hord. ivIF. .'c1f stat. d Lh-" t. he N-Ir. Knight stated that ,:he •£1Ctl eer has ..�i:_tri-WLo£1 cast-.3 estimatem as slated and the coast estimates ap. uar to be in line t-li`l't the, cost. of :gook similar niati re and 3t1C?illil he accepted, Mr, Mt'1'•✓?illon made a f£ ation to approve the Final al Pjcit.ting ., Bear Villas Add for-1- hale I subject to t.h,, City EYtgkeert- letter dac •ed Nlerch 31, 1983. Mr. Cotten seconded the fn-ot..,-m, ,,;TInd ':he Vote is as follnw'- ..-.-aqe Six - Planninq & Zi-.�nmc-j April 51 1985 1983-046 :...... ............. ...........---. ......... ....... Ayes: Messrs Lynch. Deithloff, McMillan, Cotten & Tyson plays: Non: Chairman Deithloff oeclar,:,d the moticin crlrri�?--. (The Commission iNlembers took a break. from 8:113-8:20 p.M, ,,' VT. PUBLIC ZC;',..ITNG C-ASE - R, QUEST OF RUHIA"RD TI FC),R FR ... PID FOR CI-L.Ur LINE ON. MAU!: —BF. ,-5,DjAC-ENT MDRTHI MAY WEST R... A-07--.------------------------ ---------------------- C'hairn-lan C)efthloff cipeneo* tie pulhhc nearing rind stated that the proponents would be heard first and then the opponents. Dr. Richard Thames, 4001 AUrporL Froeway, Bedford, preserAed his retyiest for a planned development for VIA line dviellirigs. 1--ic, st,,,-ited that ho..,n,.--. sizes ,viou"i'd, range from 1,150-22,000 mpiare Net. fW 'Fhornes asked for fr,-nt, and side yard variances' 'as' Well z-'s -I in the requRement from sAty to fifty feet. of Qh •ofmay He also read a letAr that had been cirm.i-,-Ood by nd among tile horneowners, and respo.n-ded to, s',irne, He his architect, Nli<�e Hamil with Shamburqt-,,r & who presentc- 6 a rendition of the type of work they do, C' 'I a n - hairmiain Deithloff reft.,renced the CAQ En§neerV letter diate.-Al 29� .), '3 rnentli-oried the vadances rej.Sued. He �a5ked' if there adr-litional proponen"-.i. MI-ark Sheets, 101) E. Ash Lane, felt that the demdoper's quality of wrork is exceflent. Mr. C)avid Peters, 307 Fair Daks, stated thaL he is In favor of this rezoning becam, he would. hike, to see. E)Aess grow. bC---!inq no additional proponents, Chairmsm Dc-Jthloff a5t ed if there were any opponents. Nin Pmer Sontirka, 1800 Shadow state"', that w askcd to -eprpsent rn• st of flhf opponents, He presented a rep-resenLdq 9 of 13 hornemm-n notified thaL are oppoxing this minq He poWed out that thiis zoning got-;:-i ag iins-t what is proposed an the More Land Plan KW felt ti.-i-is nt. vvifl, compowxj the drainage problem to the east at thk time. I---lc-: wants, good ht-.imes, noL patio homes. Mr R.od Ashford., l504 Cednr FUdge, stated that, he. wa:,, iri a�,--ecrnent with Mr. Sowirka,'F mn-1-nerILS. ",Ai. I, -�h -w -)ent -i --yn,, handed out several copies of the propo,- -d developn plai to the auddnem I�Ioge Seven -- Plarininq & Zoning Co-nmission. - April 5, 1983 1983-047 ...........-..............--.-——---------------------------------------- .................. 'Ar, jarnes 1-darrison, 503 Traikvood. stated that he was also concerned about the drainage problem. Ole proposed thyrt a.- be placed agair-)sl, �Al deveiopimr--tn' LotH the drainage pral--.-11111-,�vn is solv -,,.• Sc al property owfters complained that H--iey did not receivi� notice of the heari-q it was explained that the narnes of the owners of Uie Sur rou.."..'J,inn property ai'e from the latest tax roH. It was noted that the h.-Os iv; the Woodland-, Addition ar. st.ffl uncler the devi--fllopef's narne. 'ft. was also ."",iW,ed out that signs ar,-, posted on the subject propert'.y -,or ffie beviefiL of thr-'se in-31, notified by n-lai- Mr. Arez. 1004 Chittarn; Sue A •gusat, 101 Wakut Way; Chery! Reynolds, 4M hc - - -1; FA,-iro, -314 U. Main; Gary Haston, 200 'auley, . jrnwa , - -'.-d C-Opher, i", 412 Knollwoo-idi; Bob Murray, Acorn Drive; arid Russ Lynch, 1705 Acorn Drive eac? in ---Ippo'�.jfion of the i-equeited zoning chancle. Chairrylan l_-)6thloff asked Mr. Thoiries why he wa.-.-1*',-,-.,d requested; zoning. Mr. Thocnes stated thai- a study had been prepared on the de-nand o-f ho-using, and it was f.."und :ghat patio homes were in high d=rnand. Viere being no addidonal opponents, f2ha1F'man DeRhiriff closed the public hear&g. Mir. Tyson >t-lted that 11-he Shared the same concerns as the propert.y otvners thay. no trade-offs were, being for -exceptions to Lhe City Ordinances being roymsh-A by- the Petitioner. Mr. Cotten stated that he Nd rot beHove the proposed developrnent vvill' hyprove the area. Mr. Lynch stated that then Oty is currently reviewing its F-Sure Land Use Ran. He stated that he hated to lose the RA prcy3erty. Messrs. McAlion Enid WO-h1off agreed Wh Ow other Commission rnembers. Mr. LynA stated that he ff.-lt. Thames 1-wd a good plan, but, did -int feel it was ail pi"0" ate ':Or d Uli- loci --' 'n. Mr. Cotten made a motion to recorrin-iend denial of Zoning seconded the motiorie and the vote is -,s feilllovvs: Ayes. Nkssr.s. Lyrv%, Deithloff, N&PAillon, Cotten ac Tyson! flays: None, Chai •mari Deithloff declarml the motion carried. UK Commission Members took a brea;< from. 9.20-9:25 p.nn. Y Page Eight - Plan"u", "-_:oning Can­irr6,,,si,-.in 51 198 ,. 1983-048 ............................ ........................... -------- vil, HEARING (--'ASE ZI-398 - f!ECNjE-,-,,T NANCY 97-AY Fr,)F--. ZONING C•2 6, E< C3N iR ' -V 5, e ..f-F11 3Q E. TAV1_',_DR AT"?'-'-"' CD, CJF' - .�AST OF N0---RT**---1 PhiN...S- NORTH (OF CINNAMON RIDGE. VVEM OFTOLIJEETO -- ------­----—--------------------------------------------­--—--------------------------------- -------­­----------------- Chairi-t-ian Deithiofff the pubUc hearing and stated that tho pt-opo."'ents be heard first and then the opponents, [,-unaway, representing _',irn Harris, presented the request for rezoning to allom, con-snercial use and at R-1, density. He distrib;-fted conceptu.-al p!an of Lhe poroject whkh Mo invo�fves property re.cently 1-net v"ith ap...-_"roval of, the P&Z Cornrnission for C-2 & FA-4 zoning presented by Rust i'1i {. ecli'!`3t%�Fi> TO C-2- portion 0111 frori• on G.."ade Road and 1'Ji,,--. P,-4 will i:ia.ck. up to the Cinn,­.-rnon I,�i d ge MAW The s"eets will t:i; p_ri-vcite and aiaintained by ;.:a honieowner'`, assDciation. Chairalan'. asked if there were any --idc-litional proponents There beQ none, he asked for any opponenits.. Mr. Ralph Garner. who lives next, to the prol:)osed propet, stated his concern about - -it traf he proMerns on F',­-'ad and the increase On traf F& that would be ,he ,,-urrei generated by the propoLed de-veloprnent. He aL,1-,.',ed what the -ir,� for Gl,,Ioe Mr. Knight stated that ,.:he City is wvare of the growing traffic pi,oblerns this area-, hcjvvever, Oecause onc-­Ihalf of the 'vo..,-.0 i-1. in 'Grapev'ine it will take is connnitMent. "n boi'h to solve this proWern. V the mewirne, then City will rnainLain the Euless portion of this tau? ED/F'W pJan-s. to rnak.,.' o.orne in­,f_")rovevne^-.As in N.- near future at the Trite section of Chade Road ev Airfield Drive which will event-uOy include, lvlr, Thornpst-.n, ',=9[11118 Lerrion La-i-e-, Bates, 211 Airnond Lane; :`'on Johinsori, 309 Unnarnon Lane- F?,,andy Hoilhon, 304 Cmnamon Lane; Unothy Eckersley, 2904 Winon Lane; My Fulton, 106 Admiand Lane; Sue Eckersky, 2904 Larnon Lane; ax-i Beth T1"on-1pso-r" 2908 Lprnnn Me; each spoke in opposihon of the zoning request- citing the foHoMng reasons, he property Surrounding Cinnanion Ridge is zoned M, Mich was a factor when they decidad to purchase their 'htornes. 2. There is no Mween the single 'family i-in Cinnamon iridge, and the proposed R-4. 3. of traffic, oi­. Glade R.ria-,J. 4. The proposed R-4 zoning woWd be in the nuddle of FW zonlrig. -Ik� ­iot'hi 5. Concern that once the property is zoned for .R.-4, ti -'re is, .1 _ • keep -n bej. ­f? ng Pr" rty t13 the vvesL fron n-.y rezi-wied for R-4. the � 'n -linin _"Pr" E 1 !\,lj!-je Pjan,,-jr-,jj 7"nin nii,-,sion - April 5, 1983 19B3-049 In vkw of the horneowneA concern Mr. -I'Dunwaly offered 'm put a 1111,510 foot buffeit of R-3 next to Cinnamon FRi.,',.,-- �e. 1--le said Q could not. speak-. for lvlw. wl me prop"--'rty is tn, the e,I s Mr. Rusty AdeDeam-nan, owner of the� adjocent p.-Operi'y receiving P-&Z a-pproval fo- 2 11 R-4, stated that he has no protiern • it.h. an R-3 or.- his prieperty soo-, -,,o go before the City C-ouncil. There being no addMonal proponents or opponents, Chairman DALh1off rAnsed Lh"-' public hearing. NY Tyson point-ed out that the request is for straight. R-47 vvhich may or rnay be e -elopc - a,� s P'e'r. N-IcMiflo-, stated that tiE, is not comfortable with R-4 next to developed R-1. mos", of thr-, C.'o!-nrr1issio.n r-nernbers agreed flit. f buffer is needed. Mr. Lynch could only sufloort R-3, Fot R-4., --..mless the buffer area in increase? Kdr. Cotten asked Mr. ,dim Harris, owner, he couid live with R-3 over the entire multi-Family area. Mr. Harris stated that, he could and. forn-mlly arnended his mming recliesL to R-3 frorn. -N41" 1-ynich rnlade, a r-notion to nppro� '81' of Zoining Ca-. #398 a-L- airm:'nded Mr. Cotten seconded the motMn, and the vote & as follomm Ayes: Messm LyncN Cotten Tyson & N4QAijQ,., lays. Mr. Deid'iloff Deithioff declared the rriot.,--in carried. VIII. PUBLIC f-lf-,:BRTNG - RE'(DUES-T OF DAVIS FOP., f.)F ?OWING ["RON1 1..- -.5 s -'..""K.....�.!�---- f "FE-Vi-F RA ......�X.' 'iv-D.- �MEN'--T...T'--'-3...F ""\NrU "�T 'f--'JTATES .......................... ....................................-".-..................... opened the public hearing and explaine-01.1 t-',,e proponents, �vok.;'d be heard NO and then the opponents. €Ar, Duncari R�osdile re quest. for rezoning on behalf of' 'i-he OWnerf)fthis property, Don Davis. Ragsdak, stated thaL & completing the Mr. lhid an error and that they Yvanted a C-2 zoning on the 5.763 acres fmndng RM. 157 Mtead of leaving it I.-I and R-5 .gin the back 9 aicres of the property. pacie Teri - Plan inn & 21 ' 1-1 -- April 5. 1983 1983-050 ------------ .......................... ,.agsda,'.--e --AaWd TaL they had a Ilan whf--,rehy they shokv the properL,,,; divided into six (6) phases of approximately 1-1/2 sores each at R-5 dendLy. Mr. Deithloff asked N/111r. Racjsd,:fIe, to explain the C-2 zon.jing. Mr. R.agsdale stoted that their request tonight cleats specifical"ity with the 9 -ar-'f es. on the back Eli the horA end of the Iract.,. they are abo-u'r, a minor cofTifnvrcjal center that WOW service Ke Naffic flow up and down F.M. Mm Tyson asked Mr. Rags-daie what his developnwnt plans were for this tract and Un-, tifT'i-ing fol. sanle. Mr. Ragsdale stated that basinally they planned a 24 Wts to the aern Mr sale, project. and that 0--;ey Would. probabl.".. begin sorlletirnk�.' if', the r-'if this yeai-. Mr. Cotten asked Nk. Ragsdale if he had looked at a lower zoning He further stated Nat to has sorne� concern about straigih-111, R<-5 zoning, 'a, ak.:-- stated that they had looked at that, but what. they are pre�,-,:.,nting -,-onight ,vlf•. R �sd is a very Prelirninar"'i concept and would -ine interested in workin;.-, Wit.11 the rl regardiry their ideas on this pi.-npert.y. Hovvever, it doesn't. niean they be able tc-I live with whnt -s but Hiey- are willin-g, to i-alk , bci-t it. tAn Lynch stated that the Commission had looked at other zonkyj cases W the #rE :i that had aWn-ii- pted to c1ci With 'R-5 and all had n-iet with disappov r —., ai, thi,- I_z-A-el. i-iFi! alstCl stal--e, d that the or-ly two avaHable t;C? this dien-sity is. ti7i R- 4 ,16 u/,i; corne back ON a CUD. 44N L-Inch explaint-d to k1r. Rags&-ile, the requhTqnenLs for a Manned Development and fvlr. Kti',.-ght stated that Mr, Ragsdalle could withc1raw and would receive one-halm ol' his fHAg fee back or to could reiTiest that his zorring reqnst tic tabled to Alm time far preparation of the zoning request as a CILH) for rnulti-fafrilly zorAng at a lower densiq and corne back before the Coinmissian. Mr. Ragsdale -,tate-d that, would. like to have tJiis zoir-iiing case tabled. Cl`,,airnnan [Deithloff ,;sked if there were any addiUcinal proponentm There being none, he asked if there were any opl--ionents Thiiere wer---- none. Mr, Lynel.r. made a motion to cont • ue the pi-ibhe heai-ng at the next. regij!a-.-`,y to -allow Lk-e Petitioner to revoe Its Zondig recvAest to carnply with the requRenients for CLJD zonfng at 20 unit,, to the ai-.7-e for Lhe are'i fo*r multi-family zoning and that no other business wou,`.d tak,- place unti`,, zordno-, enze is heard. Mr. Cotten seconded the aiation, and the vote A as Wows: essrs. Lynch, Deithloff, McMillon IC� fl-� , ',Aten Tyson NAone Chair fnwi Deithloff declared ti--;e, carried. Paue Eleven - Ranning & Z,,, i IC (---M -lission - April 5� l983 1983-051 ............................. —°------------- '9 vr -hairman Daithdoff stated that the Ptb�ic Hearing of Zi-ning Cazse il,139 11 continued -it the next. regularl,,,, schedluted me-eting on Tues---J.Iay April 19. DX PUBLIC HEARING - 7(.)NNG� CASE /,;4`10 - IREQUEST OF' •ROV FULLA.F.,R, FOR CHANGE E. l" ZCI*-JTP---,`G FROM AM T -2 CA,,l TR, F--. TAYEO-D- J.-C-RAND SOUTH & ADIA.C-EN, - ----- AbJ- CEt\IT TO NTY STREET ANt F-I c"';R T R ..------------------------------ .............. ,�,,DDITJU-A ...................... Deifthlnff opened the public hearing and expl!in ed that the proponents would be heard first. and Men the opponents. Fuller presented the i-equest for re.�.oninq f.rani to R•2. C-I 7: Hle- went over current zoning across (.',lade, RoM in Grapie.vine and djscuss ed the reasons this zoning was compatible wit,,? surro;-irli--Iing NK Tyson asked if there were any. water Hnes frorn Grapevine In this area. I'VI-r. stated that Grapevine has a miater Hne in Main !-Street extendiing Lo, the ii--.tersectjon or; Roa.di. and' North. J'Allpin Street. Cha.,r- -if -Joff -,led if there were any additional Th.-i-re beif,!f-j none. .ran Deit! n he ask. ?-, if there Were any op.-ponents. Ihere being no chairr-f-lar, hlorf closed the public hearing. Mr. Cotten made a motion to approve Zonbiq Case 0400. Mr, seconded the moUnn, and the vote K as follows: Ayes: Lyi-,ch, Deithfoff, Mi...c.M.fliori, C,3Uen i'r Tyson Nays: None Chairi-nan Deith,".off declared the mr.."jon carric-A. x F-ZES(.')LUTION l--U----QL.JIE5TING INITIATIO04 OF A MLA.TJ-FA.--'AILY ZC)Nff,,G -DISTRICT 01 �'-,,-'J F'J-M� TO T!--i,.'- ACRE ..................... ..................-................ N1. Tyson stated that lie felt it was in -:Dur b,,-:.--s'-L interest to look at a andManNy zoning distTict Unt is Anited to 20 unit, to the acre. �'-h, r. d � -�. Deithloff rMed if the designation of a limited zonhg di is to a maximm-1 dente ty of 20 units to the acre awnuld, come at a later Ar� Knight stated that vie wouN have a draft of an amendrnent to the, Zoning Ordn ance, assurnin-ig it re,,-.,eives favwshle recornmendalion frOM City COMA I. Mr. CoUnn rnade a motion to forward this R.-e-o lution -i-in to City P':a"e Twelve - - j inin ._.&_ ._7�o_r__.j Commission..... AprEE `7 l8-')" - - - __-...._-- a._._------.: c _..................... Mr. 1. y€?ch seconded the mo.tFnn. C-"h iirit n De•ithlo f asked if our R--5 zoning could be redesi-ri, -.-ited to 20 u%<; in of the existing 24 l�i�r. l\E`11�j�-4t Stc -ed that this Clf_est_rt E"€ should be mferred, ,:fJ `-he t.,Et1' '1 tt�F':. :1 '}o see. if there would .ii any legal re e?rc.ussion . Mr. Lynch stated that changing the existing -5 to 20 da could probably- ._au_;E_ ri blf'E3"i With £;Xisting areas that have already 'iE'E:€? !-o ic.,d R--5, v,,h3c.1� would :hen become non-confornAng i.f:ies if the dt'nsit✓ wns r'.CIE.fced".. The Vote is n"' foliown. Aye= l:Iesuo Lynch, Deithlaff, Mi Iv011on, Cotten & Tyson Chairman Deithlof f declared the t'i.ution. ear€"ied. Xi �D,"J(D1_1J=?NP.ENT There being no further to stress to candid, the rt-eetin.-g aeljrr-€rne-di at - .55 p,i-n, r- f z