HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-07-05 1983-0083
083
irk}G E D,41,
e g u 1 a r -V'If'eL;rj✓:
Planin.ing u Zo., ricl }gin n�lssi,�n
201 North E tar Drive
Mess, Texas
:1i;ly `:, 1983
600 Milleeting to DisrusS '-agenda .Items
6:30 p.m. o Cali to Order for Commission Consideratiun of Scineduled Ite;rins
eNVO :ATION
r•i Pt:C)1'At_ OF MltvIUT1`-S - Regd,,_ir <vlee.tinq DaLed June 24 133::
1. Pt.1E3t...IC HEARING
Ming gy, #412 of Jim E itz,ie;,ald for change of 7} ning From
C-. & -2 to �T,-D for Conforivin "iousi. ?? limited E.° fC3 ��� i3;'3,'', o{'}
Tracts 2B c; 2H1, J.P. 1--ial lard Survey, A-711, located e-st of --ii mes Drive,
west & adjacent to 'forth Nlain Street, sr.,,uth -^:f E,/1idb^ay Drive and rortch
of lit t. 183.
H. PUBLIC H111E.-ARING
RepI.eitti:�,_, ,if Alexander-C} llurn AvIdi#ion, I.ot. 3011, int o 1__at s 30101 and.
?0; 1;',1, Mated at. the southeast: cornet of E. i--lui.tt: Le}rie ar South €iiain
Street.
M. CONSIDER SITE:: PI...fAN
Development Plans for Lot 2, `gay Shelton Subdivision located east of
North Main Street and north F< aeisac,.nt. to Har,vood Road.
1903-084
Regular Meeting
Planning & Zoning C,�:rnrniLsion
7tit y 5, 1983
CALT TO ORDER
i£z re,:-War mee.tinq r_,f the Plan Fin; it Zoning Cr:)mmission eras called t o order at 6;30
:. n. in the Council Chambers of the Euless t' t; Hall by Chain-nan ohn D. it.11iC?$i,
I-ME::NABERS & f;-i ?A#_F PRE'Sc:-r-JT IAfE P,S AB >EN_J-
Carl -Tyscm :John Lynch
:Jon Deithloff
Robert I&I'rlillon
jack F111
`.Sari fatter,
Carolyn Park
Jarnes Knight, City Enymeer
Julie Harrrory Secretary
VISIT0R
J£ri-E . :tzger= Frmi Powers
Eric SdAurnph Pl•.r. Domin.,,juez
f'Ai. W. (a. i�vlcr v irs. # ccr, 4hitcn
er
Re FAt i da i ie Mae N`r.� ormich,
Becky Margeiy Williams
Pzenr:e tl-£ E. Bi'.uglliton
INVOCATION
Till-! invocation eras given by Sari Cot.t.e::<
f:hairrmm) [Deithloff wef.eomed the two -ew rrwrr£l-£ers to the ;Planning & Zoning
Commission, Jack HJ I arid Car,.A r3 Park.
F1P1jRC DAL. OF NINU TY S
The. :-£-£irk{rtes of the regular meeting dated June 2t 1983, were approved vAth the
Alowing addition:
p£ya §a, :dd the under Any ;/l;
Mr. Pic,"AHI'll m stated ti-£at removal of the signs during the ,,cork week would
allow rrfci4d enance of the right-of-way during the v,,ork :^it?f;k by the City,
Pa,-:e Two - Fllannhg & ZonWn Corni-nission - July 5, 1983
................ ...... ................. .... 1983-085
1.
PUBLIC 1-AEARING - ZONING C,,-'\SE #4,12 - REGMEST OF MA FITZGERAi.-F) MR
2 fU C ---C,
--E OF 70N!--.`-AC� F-ROM C-1 & C,'- UD F'OP �JWORII'AINC; HOU III G 0--,-
R IC, N i
Q LINUTED TO A-7111
EAST OF HIMES DRIVE, WF---s-F & AMACENH, To STF-\'_E
l---
10L.JT. 1 I 11
N' MIDWAY DRIVE NORTh i OF
.......... ..........
Ch8irrn.an f.),ei-thloff the public hearing and stated that. the proponents would be
heard first and then the opponents.
'Ar. Jim F-itzgerald, 590 Singleton Roat NNNothian, Texas, presented hN request for
rezoning from & C-2 to for agar-trnerits at 20 u/a. Fie distributed tentative
pians to the Commission ,howdy what they are proposing to build and stated that he
felt this was the best use for the property. Fie a isn stated that he intends to own the
--rope
'rty hirnself.
—hairrnan Deithfoff ask •d Fitzgerald if he received M11r. Knight's letter dated. June
30, 1983.
Mr. F'itzg raid had not received Mr. Knight's letter, therefore, a copy was given to hire
c -e v, -ei e -, he hiat -J no p, -3e
� f %jw. Aft , rev,. v,,dnqj the -ttei stated t.. - lie h�— roblems with tl
requirernenLi.
NO Tyson asked Nlr. Knight if two parking spaces were required.
1,,1r. Knight stated that was correct..
M.r. F-itz,,jerald stated that Q intends to conform to all the FA-5 r-egiulations, except that
tlh!e donsity WOLAd be 20 3.3/a Wead of 24 uh.
Chail'n".
[)eithlOff asked for any additional proponents. There being none, he
for any opporents.
NA.rs. Fran Powers, 517 Himes Drive, represwiting the opponents to this zoning case
that t-1,!ey were not happy with the idea of apartments. She also presented a
petition, contairAny approxu-nately 45 siign,
A-ures, to the Planning. Zoning C-on-imission
of those in opposition to Lh.is rep,oning.
EAr; Eric 5)chkimpf, 511 1-Yrnen Drive, symke on the following negative; reason for not
approving this ,.,oning request-
J. Lac.1, of privacy.
2. Decrease in property value.
3. Traffic corqestion.
4. The element of crime corning into the area.
5. Ove •tax9y of police and We departments.
6. The noise and poliution level of the neiclW)orhood would go up.
NA;r. Dorninquez, 406 Hime�s Drive, stated that it would not be as peaceful if a'-,'.,,7tr.nent3
were AM and that it would create overcrowding of theft schools.
NAs. Powers asked the amouin.t (if rent that would in-e chargedl.
Pa qe 'Three Pl-anninq & Zoning Comn-lission - ._'N.iJ,y 5, 1983 1993-086
............
Fitzeerald stated that at this tine they plan to charge $325hporah for a are-
bedroorn apartment and $400-./month for• a two-hedrooni apartaient. He also stalms! that
these an-3ounts were in keeping with the _urround i rig apartment rcornplexes.
k/lIrs. Pnwers, ,;tated that at these prices the apartrnenk would be close to what she
would consider to be low rent aparbronts.
There being no additional opponents, Chairrnan 1._)ejthlcj,`f closed the pubhe heahn,
Mr. Ty,,sc)n St.nted that his bigg
,e,ft concern was the density. 1--le feels. that, it, is tan high
for the a.rea. He also Mated that he would like to see a PD or CUE) sci they c
� ould
hoiin* this developroent. to sorne kind of a plan and a lower density.
Mn Hill stated ths concern about providing dequate roorn for fire lanes, and 311 the
e.q.uiprnent that vv.ouid' be used.
Mr. lvIck/lId lon. and I'vir. Cotten agreed with Nh% Tyson regarding the densily and N11r.
Cotten stated that he would Ake to see a higher i'ent for thiese apartrnent.s.
Ws. Park stated that her cancerri was the firnited arnriunt. of frontage on Main Street.
and the potential problerns that could be caused iri an ernergency situation. She also
St,.-rtes` that she WOLIld like to have sorne definite plans 5obn,.itted for P & Z approval.
Mr. Cotten rnade a t-notion to recoumn-iend denial of Zoning Ca 5e #412.
k4rs. seconded the niation, and thie vote is as follows.
Ayes: Mrs. Park & Messrs. Tyson, Deithloff, •A&AIllon, KAHI ch Cotten
Nays. None
Chair-nnan Deithlaff decl-_ired the :"no-pion carried.
Due to puhlication of the Public Hearing for Itern 11 at 7:00 p.fl,_, ?tern 'fit was
cori-- ide.red ahead of Item: IL)
HEAFZIN,,,,. - REPLATTING OF Al.. ADDITJC)t-�- LC")T 30A
DAID LOTS 30AR & 31.ARt� !::�OCXYFID -,T TI-E S-C)UTHE.W C, TNER. �T
1--flUITT LANE AND SOUTH NIAIN 'STREET
Chairman Deithloff apened the pubhc hearYng and stated that the proponents would be
heard first and then the opponents.
VV. 0, Taylor, 501 S. Main, presented his request for replatLinq of 30A.
Alexander-Cullurn Additioi-i inito Lots 3,")AR & 30AR .
Nk. Tyson asked if he owned the house on the corner and if the hedges were the
dividin-iq fine, rDr if the pf•aperty went back behind the hedges.
Mr. Taylor stated that the property went west of the hedges.
NAn Cotten asked if he plans to build single-fx-nily homes.
:>a- e Four - l"'h:mnif & �`oniraj C rnifnissi inn -- July S, 19l?3 1983-087
Mrs. `ecui Wh{tef-ie:r, answering for Mr. l ayla q stated that 'ilia; intends to buy the
I3rL3 3Brty and that. st3Q �3lea? tt lstff.l 8 BfClylf, F--1E7iii!: hoi-ne of pp ; ' , •0f.i€�
r3:<fflii,iv i square
feet and would line to have <'a side e.n ry- garage, A possible.
Mrs. Park asked the size of the surrounding lots.
€-vIrs. Whitener stated that they were, appr: xiniately one to two acres.
There being no additional proponentq Chairman Deithloff asked for any opponents.
There being none, he closed the public hearing.
Chairman Deithlof. stated tl:at. this r.p-l-1 tttfng was pretty sts.aijht -Forward.
NY Tyson and Mr. McMillon stated that they were in f�a.vor of tl-als ret,lctting.
Mr. Cotten made a nnotinn to r+ecoarmena_l approval of the Repl,att.inj of Lot. 30A1
Alexander-Cullum, Addition into 1---ot` 30AR & 30ARl.
Mr. McNlillon seconded the ranotfon, and the vote is vas. follows:
Ayes; Mrs. Park u hvles7r . Tvs:+un, 7eit.hloff, Mc Nliillan, : fill & Cotten
Nays: Ni�ne;
C' airman Deithloff decla-red the :notion arried.
" T 2, f;A Y : L--
TJt CON?i ) R SITE 'LAN - 1]ClE .()P-MENT l-AtJS FOR L.C.)
(EBC YISIr , LOCATED t-,Vl OF NO :sTFZ :l. NORTH & ADJACENT
TC i-fAR4 C7-a ir � J
-
Mr. Knight stated that the development, plans have been pi,el-,eared in af,cordance with
the subdivision: •ec-iuirenients.
I`,i";r. Joe Pitt, f='nginee;r, with `sett & NlerntL, ciCdre,;:s+.,`d tvlr. leper of
June 30, 1983, a:;c steated that he had no problems wit€"a these requirements. He also
stated that they have chan• ed the name of Hie apartments to flar ;ood Park
,=partn"ients.
Mir. Pitt stated that he has sent a letter to the adjacent propeily cvinef ', l%Ar.
Delrnonteque, across Harwood Road ri;Mmsting permission to do the grade Lo dreahi
features incorporated wAthin the �fte Deveiiopment Plan.
€.+lr. Tyson asked if ties had been able to jet a hold of PAr. Dieinionteque prior to thi.�
letter.
Mr. Pitt stated that they have not been aisle to Bete a hold of him at t-t:i:, tin-:e,
therefore, May o not have e: response, regarding grading of the
P"age Five .- Pianninq & 7:-ninq Ju'%, 5 11?83 198_3_08E.-
.......................... .......................
Mr. sLnted' that he does noL see that the developers of this prnperty have -]one
anyt' nr: til, change the dir-otJon of U,e flow of torm water, rix,,Qff. Fwher, if the
-he gr�
develcpe.rs are unalhide to s'ecure, the T--wrmission of the Property _.wrier to do I -,.ding
ne r e.2,cai- y to the irnproverne-mc, proipr-,,sed, the construction of those irn-
h U 1-1 s,
,3rovel nt.,-, wo;Ad not be a:lowed. hey %vould then have twn (-,)pt'
L Negotiating vAt'h the property owner to acquire, his to dr, UhP
2. if they are :._finable to iew--h an agi-ee.n-ient with the property owner at that
tirr-.e, the; could corne b�,,el/ to the r."itv and a:fl< for the -'itv's <_-,5,: tar
H-1 that Pasenit-nt. Although, that dec'sion, would have to be made
s pose
by the C.-,if.y C uncil whether o not tl!,ey :-elt the improwen-.1e�nt- prm�, _d
would warrarft the (_'it"i bec-Orron- involved.
'A
T j,-. stat,ed- that the dievelopment of the pwoperLy would not. occur they
e Pd an, of- the City entere--d ilnto a role
, ach to help thorn reach an
Mr. Knight stall-:A that w,-ts carre •"".
ivi r. T ys o n stated that approving the Site Deveioprnent Plan tanight- would sti':l he
c:ontingent upon getting the ,.ipproval to do some gr-ading and that. the F)Iat would not
Eye filed Until such ::Ime thall- perm ision W do su had been granted.
M:. k"'n io h t st. iteC thEA this will riot actually be a platting of the propei,ty- It. had been
-v nt, it would corne under the re-+:uireme-As -,)f
determinfed that if submitt.ed as a y -pl�
No. 767 reqmirinq a public hearing and :wait:.1ration of ever,,,
property ownf.,f- in the Ray Shelton Additton. /\ccardingly, develop;-n;.:1nL plans fior one
Ray Shelto-I have heen subr-0-ted for review a nd
f the c-iginal IOL5 of he
apprmval.
Mr. McIvIiHon rnade o rnot.ion to recommend a-proval of the Site Plan fo, Lot 2, Pe y
S -c Aingent upon meetiq thie requirements of the i
Sheft. in Adid - ion, cof City Engineers
letter of June 31"J", 19b j.
Mr. C;Dtten secon.ded the motion, afid tl-, vot. is as follows:
Aye3. NIrs, P�irk e( Messrs. Tyson, On, Flill -"--'otte:--,.
I-Aays- N-ne
I
'-hairnmr.
F)ei-hlofl' dt-,clared the motion, carf,ied.
0-,,airrnan Deithdoff stated. that the Electi,,,n of P & Z Officera wo-uldl be held at the
,R11Y 19t.'Fi rneeting.
TV.
A D,J C)",J F,N M E N T
'hers; beinq no further busines--, to discuss, 0-3e r-neeting w,,3:n adjourned at 7:10 p.m.
ej
C rn-1 n