Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-09-06 198 --121 AU NDA #-Tanning & Zoning Commission 201 N. Ector Drive Euless, Texas September b, 19€33 7:30 p.m. - "-'all to Order for Cnr-missio*3 Consideration of Scheduled Item: INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting Dated August, 16, 1984 OLD BUSINESS 1. f-UR '.H!-:R CONSIDERATION 01= PLATTING Final Platting of the J. W. 1_ewellyn Addition-'Phase 11, located north & adjacent. to South Pipeline: Road, south of S.H. ltd, and west of Texas Continental Expressway Addition. NI:':W BUSINESS I.I. CONSIDER PLATTING Prr.iiminary Platting of Oak Hollow Addition. located south adjacent to Glade Road, west of Fuller-Wiser Road, and north of the Cinnamon Ridge Addition. ill. CONSIDER PLATTING Final Platting of Williamsburg, Addition, located south & adjacent to Bear Drive, west of NnFtl-i Aain Street, and north of proposed Cheek Sparger Rood. IV. COiNS)IDER PLATTING Final Platting of -l-rail Lake Estates-1='tease II, located west of Lakewood Drive, east, of F.`1. 157, and north & adjacent. to Lakewood Townhornes Addition. V. CONSIDER PI-..A1 ZING Cor-ohined Pre.-Iii-ninary & Final Ptatt.ing oif Met Village, located south of Glade Road arid west & adjacent to Quail Run Estates. V1. C ONSIDERATIOPI OF THE. OFF-STREET PARK11"-JG l-..,,1Y0UT REQUIREMENTS' FOR PD C-)R[AN;;NCE NO. 685 f-or:c:ideration as to whether an arnent-Irrient 'to PD Ordinance Nu. 685 shall be re quired in o rder to deviate' frOM details dz�lirieate.d on the approved €:}evelopment. Plan. 198:3-122 Regular Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission September 6, 1983 CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning u Zoning, Con-irnission was called to order at 7.30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Euless City Hall by Chairman J;Oh n [)eithloff. MEMBERS & STAFF PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT. John Ceithloff Jahn Lynch Carl Tyson Robert McMillian (_Carolyn Part: Sari Cotten James, Knight, City Engineer lack [--fill Julie Harmon, Secretary Rod Tyler, Senior Planner VISITORS "dill. Snyder Bill Morrow Jackey [=luitt Barbara Bannon Walter A. 'Elliott Nancy Sexy Willie Mae NIcCorrnick Jo ':Jic•kev Pete. Hennessey Joe CCaddel Tom Hart Jess Lewellyn Boh Eden INVOCATION The invocation was given by Mr. Carl Tyson. APPROVAL OF' MINUTES The rninutes of the regular meeting dated August 16, 1983, were approved with the following Correction: (1) Pare 5,_ Paragraph 7, under Item III: Nlr. Cotten stated that he felt R--2 would be :-s-tore suitable for this property. €='age Two Planning c?< Zoning Commission SF pt�ernil-r 6, 1.1113 1993-12 3 OLD BUSINESS L CQ' €tiIDE R PLATTING - FINAL PLATTING OF' THE J.W. L+`WE:1_..1_YN IAE DT"TIf;N- €-'H tSE II. €_OCf TEi_� "°3;.�E� tH <�� ;�D�,saCE�1T T� .i�l.l i l i 1-�T1=�t LI1`JE ROAD, :��1.3I H OF S.H. 10, `ND WEST 171.._ .1*11:=XAS CONTINENTAL EXPREY-31NA ADDITION Chain-nyin C?c;ithlof f stated that this item had been tabled nt the August 16, 198:<, meeting until this time. Mr. Jets Lewellyri, 2€ 01 W. Euless Blvd., ELAC'SS, presented his request for Final Platting of the J. W. Le;wellyn :Addition-Phase II. Chairman Deithloff asked if he had received Mr. Knight's letter of August. 31, 1983. Mr. Le;we;llyr: stated that he had and was in agreement with the letter. t llrs. Park asked whether or not the water draining fronn the west would have a:-.v oearing on thi;: platting that requires each developer of property bear his pro-rata hire o` the c-ost. of public irnprover-?ents associated with the devcinpment under consideration? Mr. Knight stated that the welter enters can to the property from Lhe, riorth, f:f-imes through a culvert under S.H. 10 arid courses southward across the property and exits under Pipel.i.ne Rriad can the southern property line. It is about the Center of the property where storrn water runoff enters on to the }property and it is about the center of the property where. storrn water- runoff exits from the property. Mr. T son asked if any contact had been made with the owners of the western rc?perty as far its this drainage is concerned. Mr. Knight pointed out that water generally travels in that direction at the preser?t tirne ;uric,' according to the plaris presented there is no addition?al grading that would be reQuired. 1--le further stated that it is a point: of natural discl arge of the water car?to the property. €•••'lrs. Park made a motion to recommend approval of the 17-inal Platting of the J. W. Lewellyn :Addition-Phase II subject. to Mr. €night's latter of ALIg ,st 31, 1183. Mir. Tyson .seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes. Mrs. Park & Messrs. Tysnn & C7eit1-iluff €rays: None Chairman E:)eit.hloff declared' the rrtotion carried. Pare -Three - Planning & Zoninrl Commission - Sef�f.ernher 6, 1983 983-114 NEW BUSINESS COI",-dSTDER PL_r-',T-T"ING - PREL.IMINARY PLATTING OF OAK H-,..)[-.LOW �,DDI-TION, L%)CATED SOL TH & ADJACENT TO G!--.ADE €-:.OAD, WEST OF f=t_I�1__ER-WIS o-_(_�, ,�1NC? JN0RTi--1 OF THE: (_'tl"�#l`-A.MON RIDGE /-D[)ITION Mr. Joe Caddel with Dunaway & Associates, 5300 H,.rnphill, Ft. Worth, Tc>.xas, representi-n the applicant, Jinn Harris, presented the request for Preliminary P1,-At.ing of Oak: l-"ohow Addition. Chairman Deithloff asked if he h�4d receiver., Mr. Knigt:t's letter of :august 3l, ltJFs 3. Mr. Caddel stated that he had and saw no problerng with this letter. Mir. Knight pointed out the second paragraph of his letter dated i -ugust 31, 1983, stating that any recon-)mendation regaf•ding approval of the Preliminary Plat by the Planning of Zioning Cornrn ssior: should be. subject. to the Zoning (..ase Noy. 4€1 being heard by the City Cnuncil prior to Council consideration of the Prefirni-:ary Plat.. l-"ie further stated that without: favorable consideration of Zoning Case No. 411 by the City Council, the plat could not be considered. Mr. Tyson asked who designs a typical frontage road as far as the intersectiorl of Glade Road :an+_1 the frontaq e road is concerned. Fle also asked if the placement of the right-•ref-wpv has been decided. Ar. €'night stated that t4he geomi et.ricsi come from the State 1--li ghway Departrne,nt. He further stated that the sate Highway Department qs- :_rpprored the Plignment as show., on this plat, Mrs. Park: made a motion to t.alale the Preliminary Platting of Oak l--irll^.w Addit.iun until after consideration of Zoning Case C~.•lo. 4I11 by the City Council. The motion diced for lack of a second. Mr. -Tyson then made a motion to recommend approval of the Preliminary Platting of Oal: 1"lnllrw% Addition subject to Mr. Knight's letter of August 31, 1983, and with the stipc lati.•nn that Zoning Case 4411 he approved by the City Council prior to their consideration of this preliminary platting. Mrs. Park seconded the notion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes: I-Ars. Park & Messrs. Deithloff & 'T-ysnn Nays: None Chairman Deithloff declared the motion carried. Page our Planning & Zoning - September 6. 1`333 1983-12 5 CONSIDER PLATTING FINAL PLATTING OF WILLIAMSBURG ADDY 1 CATED SOU-Tl--4 & Af.11,110ENT TO BEAR C."RFEK DRIVF, WEST OV...FIT RTH MAIN ................. ............ S-f REFT, AND NORTF-1 OF PROPOSED C.HEEf­:' SPARGER ROAD .......................... ... Mr. Pete Hennessey, Herme,.ssey Engineering, 1409 'Third Street, Carrollton, 1'exas, presented the request. for Final Platting of Williamsburg Addition. F-le stated that he, hR 1 11 I -d received Mr. Knight's letter of August 31, 1983, nnA acknowledged that item regarding the right-of-way d;E-dicaLi-on to the City of Euless for construction of Cheek Sparger F-,oad, and litenn #2 regarding the provision ,.-.f utility easc-',-n-teriLs on adjacent properties for construction of proposed sanitary sewer 11ine cf-instri_Iction, and storn-) drainage facilities were their responsibility. At this time he introduced Mr. Will Snider, the architect fi_­.- the project. Mr. VVIII 5,nyder, 205 Springridge Lane, Euless, disc u9sed the type of Nuildings they intend to construct, and stated that. the,l Would he built. so as to give them the. look of loge single family type unifts. He stated that 1--hey had seqrnented their project into two general irpas, which were totally independent traffic wise. They are 8lqn proposing a berm planted area with evergreen shrubs rather than the standard fence barrier. }--le fuirther stated that these will be homeowner units with a Condominiuni Association maintairli-c. the berm area, and the height. of the screening would be a rninimum of six -feet 61) above the curb level. 1--1e also stated that they hod met with the property owners of Bear (_'rcek. Estates to the north and had very suml-ussful meeting With them on two occassions. Mrs, Park asked if they ;::lain to install a sprinkler SySteffj iFJ the her[TI. Mr. Snyder stated they will. Chaj7man Deithloff asked if the location of the berrn woi-Ad be on City property or private property. Mr. Snyder stated that it would be on private property. Mr. Tyson discus,ed his reservation as to whether or not the berm screenirv-1, would keep out pedestrian traffic 8nd keep cars from parking along Bear Creek Drive 'versus a screening fence. PvIr. Snyder stated that they plan to petition the City Council for a "No Parking" Ordinance, as requested by the homeowners, and that they would be very supportive of t1his petition. Mr. Smider stated that this entire development will be. enclosed for Sef.'U.itV reasons. sChairman Deithloff asked if they were in compliance v,,'th Mr. K`nighL's letter of August _'5i, 1983. l--lennessey stated t1hat they were. Typ tA r. on -asked whe will build Cheek. Sparger Road. Page Five -• PlaEylrit tx Zoning Comrnbsk - September 6, 1983 1983426 NAr. 1-- ennessey stated that they W conotoc.t the section of Cheek Sparger• directly in front of their ;property, as shown cm their plans, ; nd that they have also budgeted for tt<is cr_,st. Fie Awther stated that they are vvorkiny with the developer to the west, Billy Blair, arW they will share in the cost of constructing Bear Creek Chive, Mr. Hennessey stated that they plan to f wild in six (6) phases and wot_rld like to build Check Sparger Fload only prior to obtaining (:certificate; of Occ-upancys on tl:c, last phase. Mr, Knight stated that it was standard procedure that they provide cnnt.racts for all of the t=+ubliic irnproven?ents to be. constructed at one time. He further stated tha , as presented to the Cornmissror: tonight, there is only one (1) phase under cnnslderatio E. Mr. Hennessey again asked if they could build in phases and also phase construction f their public irnpr'overnent.s. Mr. Knight: stated that thk was not p-ssible under current City procedures, A ;alert is not filed of record with the ��Murity Clerk until we have cr.intracts, for ail of the p.ibhc improvevnents and have either a cash escrow or a letter of credit. for all of the public. improvements to serve ON addition. If [giasing is d sired, then the ;flat needs to be prepared . , phar,,es so that each phase could be filed as you construct the iri-i;provernents for that portion-.. Mr. Tyson read the minutes of August. 3, 1982, Planning & Zoning ComanisMon rnreeting and stated that at that One there were cnme concerns albout the visual aspects of the proposed multi-farnily. He further stated that to his r'ecollec:t.ion, suitable scrconiric_i for the property owners to the north was a solid wood fence. Mrs. Barbara Banning, W44 Stone Canyon, F)nil.aq representing g R icharc C. Ha ••.^.00d Devfelor?rrre:nt Company, who are prep,:iring plans for the single. farvily sectkmi to the west of thi:, property, stated they Would prefer si-x foot (69 berm with. evergreen or thorn hushes. A living, screen is much more de.skable frond a visual aspect then a wood screening fence. After additional L-IrSr.'i_sdan iir"ilong the Commission regardin the type of s::reer:inq that shmdd be provided, Mr. Snyder, stated that they could restrict pedestrian access into tl'rc, ph^jest from Bear Creek Chive by way of l=y:erm, and/or fencing in the plants. Mrs. Park made a motion to recornmend approval of the Final Platting of VVIlliarnsburg Addition suNect to Mr. Knight's letter of August 31, 19'813, a^c that the plat show a watering system servicing the berm and the construction of a six font Ei`;i pedestrian barrier cisirig a cnrc,bination of berm ?x fencing arid* that the appropriate details appear on the Final flat. Mr. Tyson: seconded the motion, and the vote A as follows: Ages: Mr's. Park & Messrs. Deithl ff it Tyson Nays: None C;hairn-nan Cceithlaff def.'lared the motion r,arried, Page Six - Planninq & Zoning Comrni5sion - September 6. 1983 1983-1.27 IV. COIF 6TD:fz.'R PLATTING - FINAL Pl..ATTING OF TRAIL LAKE ESTATES-PHASE 11, T DRIVE,IVE, E A -7, AND NORTI-1 & CO C,"A....T, ....F) WES OF' LAKEWOOD S1 OF 17�M. 15 1 .............. .....­....... _1JA- C,-N­r TO LAK1..WCOD TOWNHOIAES Af')DlTf0N ­­ ---—-------_...............— Mr. Walter Elliott, Elliott & Hughes Engineering, 1004 W. Euless Blvd., Euless, representing the owner il-;f Trail 'Lake DeveloprnenL, Bob Eden, presented' the reou'.._--tst for the Final Platting of Trail Lake, Estates-Phase 11, a continuation of Trail Lake strafes-Phasp 1. He stated that he had received Mr. Knight's letter of Aunkist 301 19,'33, and it is his opinion the City should participate in the: coristri.iction of the aftomn sewer if for ­o other reason than to improve the aesthetics of the park. Mr. Tyson asked where the pipe was that would run to the north. kel.r. Elliott stated that when the park was de.veloped. there were three defined drainage areas on that park site The park engineers allowed for only one. of then-.1 flhe one that con Lt out of the lake. He stated that there was anoth-er drainage area that WOUld have dumped right into the ball field and that the City should have picked up that drainage and carried it north to I..ittle Bear Creek. He furthe'. sLa4,ed that Che v. all of facilities in this area should have been prr)vided previously by the. r-,! Thierefore, we are now having to go back and provide for these facilities to serve Uaii are 1­1e stated that they are taking all the runoff to one point and taking it out at. one location rather than variOUC- 1QCAi0r!S. fvl-rs_ Park stated tier concern about the detrimental effect U-) the park that o,,oulld *his water be dumped onto the par'�,, especially sirice, there is already occur shouk, such a prn,.-.ilem in this area. Mrs. Park asked if they would be willing to t)par part of the cost of construction of the dirain8­e facilities. Mr. Elliott stated not at this tif-ne. tv'r. Tyson addressed the Str{=et Naming Cnmrnitteu�'s review of this addition. Mr. Kriioht stated that, in this cage neither the lot nun-iher3 nor street narries create any major problems. Mr. Tyson rnade a motion to recomm-end approval of the Final Platting of Trail Lake Estates-Ph,ase 11. Mrs. Park seconded Lhr; motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes: tars. Park & Messrs. Deithloff & Tyson Nays: Nome Chairman Deittiloff declared the motion carried. Page Seven - P_1.anr-Jn.,q, Zoninq Comimissinin - SepLernber 6, 1983 19113-128 ........... ........... V. C.'ON'SIDER PLATTING r,,OMBINED PRELM/I.-ENARY & FINAL PLATTING OF PJ9EL. TED SOUTH CX-_ GLAIDE ROAD ANF) WEsT & TO . ..... ................. . . ...... E _)UAT... RUN ESTAT S Mr. J ackey FluiLt, Stenbridge & Associatps, 402 Daley, No. F_\iChla, 14 I- tills, Texas, presented the reil-p-jest fof, the Cornbined Pi-ehminary & Final Matting of Mel Village. Chairman [);n1thloff asked it: he had received Mr. Knight's letter of August 3', 1983. Mr. Fluitt stated that he had received the letter and had no problefns with it. Mr. Knight stated that M-el Court and Essex Pknce will be maintained by the City. Mr. Tyson asked if the alleys would be one-wriv or two-way allevs. M _Iuitt r. F stated that they would be two-way alleys and that the owne, is trying to encourage the rear entry type garayes to the hmilrders. •/Ir. Knight. -nsked it' it would he df-,.ed restricted to rear entry only. Mr. Fluitt. stated that he was not sure at this time. Mr. Tyson asked if the Single F-amity Attached zoning wa,.1- c-irrect. Mr. Knight e3tated that was correct. two cars could adequate-ly pass each with fifteein Foot (15') Mr. T"ys n asked i ailley way. NIP. Knight stated that they could not. Mr. Tyson asked if we required covered parking, Mr. KniQ-ht stated that if the -­, rking is ir, the front of the unit there racist be two enclosed parkin g spaces be'h'ind th,_� building line. If parking is provided, at the rear of the,, i.:nit, it could be either screened or encln3edl and no less than twenty feet (2-0') from the rear property line. Mrs. Jo IDickey, 2908 Baze, Euless.. stated her objection to the ;D.11ey and tha,11- she would like to request a fence between her property and the proposed project, Mr. Tyson explained to her where the alleys were located in relation to her property by showing !_IeT. the plat.. Mrs. Dickey stated that at the City Council meeting she requested a fence between her property and theirs and it. was her understanding that one would be constructed. review of the initial zoninqj requst for this property showed that the applicant had equ 3ted R-2 zcjr-J_-.C: -ie Zoning Ordinarice does provide for creening of originally P" T1 rriult'-famiIN!, dwelhnQ, districts frorn adjacerit single family dwelliraqs. However, t-he zc-mini req:,rest was amended from R-2 to !R-2 with f;--tr Sing-'e. l= zanily Attached dwellings only pr to approval of the Zoning by the City Council. I I Paye. Ejg'ht - Planning .& Zoninq 'Con-irnission - Sep-ternber 6, 1983 1903-129 --------------- ---------- Mr, Knight stated that the ordinance does not require the screen-ing of single farnily from single, family att."71-c.hed, which is considered CWTIpatible zoning. Mr. Tyson stated his concern that this project would not he aesthc-Aically pleasing to the surrounding area because of the lack of parking restrictions, other than those in the R-2 zonhu.-I. Mr. Knight stated that they w1H have to comply with Id-ie Ordinance. Mr. Tyson made a motion to recommend appmvA of the Cornbiried Preliminary & Final Platting (if Me'.: Village -tjbjf--.ct to Mr. Knight's letter of Augiust 31, 1983. Nks. Park seconded the motionq and the vote W as follows: Ayes: Mrs. Park & Deithloff & Tyson Nays. None Chairi-Tian Deith'off declared the motion carried. Vt. CONSU')'FRATION OF 1-Hf'.-.' OFF-STREET PARKING LAYOUT REQUIREM-1-ENTS FOR PD ORDINAN'CE NO, 685 - N'SIEDET,AT ION A!.-'.. TC) WHETI---IER Aff'-J AMENP-1 if'.N-1- 5 SHALL- REQUIRED IN C)RDEP., TO r.",EV A- FRO , ORDJNAN.".,E Nr--). 1 r m DETAILS, -i'DELINEATED ON THE APPROW'-'T') [)EVELOPME- Mr. Knight stated that either he or R(,)d Tyler would try to answer any questicins that the Cornmissitmi may have. Ile further Stated that this & a request for a deviation from a "typical parking" layout that was in,-Audled as part of the Pllianried- Developrnent Zoning of the property and we feet tits is not an issue that, can be, answered adequately at Staff level. Mr. Knight went on to say that this request tonight would he @,-king relief from tQ-. requirement of the long driveway. If this body deteuridws that this was swnetNng that was not in the "spirit" of the original Planned Deveflopn-tent Ordinance Lis approved, the property owner then has the option of applying for an w-nendment to the 7oniinig request to be handled as any other zoning case at that tine or coinpl,,, with the Planned CIevelop.ment Ordinance. After addidanal discussion arnong the Commission. men hers, Mir. Tyson made a motion to resolve that this request A not within the "spirit" of the approved zoning for the Property. Mrs. Park seconded the rnotion. and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Mrs. Park &- Messrs. Tyson & [Deithloff Nays: None Chairman DeiLhlofl declared the motion carried. Page Nine - Planning & Zoning Cornmission - tember 6. 1983 M13-130 VII. A S-)J(DURNAENT There being no further business to rliscuss, Lhe; 3neeting was adjourned at 9:05 P>rn. a airr�=a;. t f�