HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-12-06 i.Vt3-Eu�+
A ENF)A
201 N. Ect.or Drive
E:Mess, Texas
[December 6, 1963
Pre-Commission. Meet. Lo Discuss `')chr.-duIe: fte..ms
:30 p.rn. _ C-311 t.n C.-h-der for Con-omission Consideration, of Scheduled it.erns
IINVC.Yf_ATIO".1
"�FIPP,OifAi__ `4__ MINUTES -- fiegular Meeting €:)..Aed Niavern'.;er 15, 1983
I> Ca1 E''d:zl€:?t==tom
PLATTING
G
C on-ibinecl Prehmina.— & Hna1 €lat:t.i.ng of Ml l V llaci£,q located vilest &
�3£.le£.'.£ent. i£3 E:a e. R(--.—ad east �"9a' av#c3c(ent. to Q;-,-.H Run 1::3tat;es. and of
.. Ickcic €-oad.
#42.4 - Re£uest of Johin 117X3 "t for <;i !hang".-, of on ...Clti<
, 2. 3, AT 4. MORK 1, Cedar €-OH E stat .;, e LOW of 3.38 acres, from R--I to
R-4, located an the norC}','s e!A c.E)i'ner of Main Street and Fdollywond MI.
II. f''U1:i1..IC.
,l on l_asi-. #426 Request of Robert.,bert. .ck3'It4"1 for a of z^ning o i
Tracts 6B, 6E <'. €1 S, --Hitt .`-.ur•vey, ';.--705, totat of 13 acres, fro.-n PA
t:.. C-2 located on the southeast ck:3rter t.3` r'Jk- M ,;in Street. and 1-l>ar';r:-it_3d
Drive rind nort.h. of 'Oh-a3 cr---ieC Ad it-on.
IV. FlUfF�L.t
L13£ j =:e E42 - Recynest of Do , Davis \'Vi c<fali
achange 5C1,
:.`£.li?.i on. race .:�BIA, 5C, 5t`:1.P,. S: 5. T� 1aspe:r S rv-te ,
06L a total of 27.171 c?Lies, trr_m R--1, `.-' u P,--2 t£J C-2 « 1'fir an
park and warehouse storage, located an the cast- £5. south Si<:lEe of 1 1. (Vase,
C£.,. and nort h of €`ynette U,eet..
1983450
RegWar Meehm.,
Planin-mg (x Zoning Corr,rn iss ion
December 6, 083
CAI...i_ TO ORDE."",
The regular meeting of the Plannisy & Zoning Corn.mjs.sion vva--, c.atled tin order at
7.30 p.m. Lhe Cliarnbers of f.'_u.`.ess City flail by Acting Chain-na!-, Robert
MEMI.-F-3ERS STAFF PRESENT
.....................................
John -i--)eithinff (arrived at 9:20 pAW John Lyrwh
RoberL Mcmill,'n Jack i--fill
Cori Tyson
Sam cotte'n
c-"arolyn Park
Ja.rnes Knight, City Engineer
J£-Elie Hari-non, Secretary
VISITORS
...............
soi-iia jackey Flubt
Rad & Kay Tyler joh, -Iaxjrrlan
Tom Shaw Vernon tvionree
Robert Carlin Phil Morrissey
w
Ke , Kalley Steve Roberts,
Don ill -10"'Ver
f� Jolie S eaij raveu, 3 F
Beth Elaine Priest
Richard. & Del-Ai.-,, Kendall, Cindy [_-'eF'rebas
d Go..r-
.i-_,-on 1--luey [:'3ail
David Browninq Hardage
And' Nurn,-,rous C-oncerra�-�d Citizen.5
INVOCATION
...................................
The invocaLian given 1:,y Mr. SIM. Cotten.
APFIR.")VAL OF
The mimles of the reqLdar meeLing dated November 15, 1983, were approved as
nuritten.
t.
PIRELIMRIARY & FINAL C-',"F- NIEL
.......Kd� o
VILI_A(_:',�� '�U."ATED EAST & ADjACENN'TI' T_
—OW, ..........................
- '�UTH OF GLADE ROAD
D 5
____.............................__..........................
`,/Ir. Jackey FUtt, Stes&widge & Awsociates, represenLing !_--Jated that
the mziin in resubrnitting U.'r-i-J.'s Plat was thie, elimination of th-e all-eys, l".1r.
t'..ICtA illo tated thaL staff had reviewed this plan and foun( it to be in! compiur3E is
With all Lhe, platting requires-i-ents.
& Zoning CommisSicm - Dec-ember 6 1983
............-......... ..................
Nlr> Tyson stated that he had some concerns about the parking area; hove veer, iif it
meet... the City ordinances then he would go along with J.t.
'Mr. Cotter: r-nade a mot5n to reconnnend approval of the Preliminary ek Final.
Platting of Mel 011age.
Ms. Park seconded the motAn, and the vote A as Wows-
Ayes: Mrs. Park & Messrs. Tyson, Mr,",lillor, & Cotten.
Nays: None
Acting .'AcMillon declared the motion carried.
PUBLIC HEAFR.J,`,-JG - ZO,`-VING C-r)6E /M24 RECAMST C)F JOHl',J FC)R A
"' t� '�. C� HiLLS, El-
E.-. OF ZCDNR-�G -..'.-)N I. 1� 2-� -, - -1 --S,I
TOTAL Or: .3'..3%. AC.,RE R-FIT."i R-4, U)CA.TE E
'�.`.T' AND H0LLYV,f,-Y.N--,1
S
C."R.NUR OF "t.).
................................---
Acting Whynan Mol",lillon operied the pi_bhc heahng and exoahwd that the
proponents Would be heard firrit and then the ooppone,,,A:a.
John Hai-Man, 1203 High ivleadow Cove, 1.Ro--,,---:,-,' Ro-,-.,l<, Je,).as. pi,esented his
recliesL for change of zoning. al's t-, stated that the-re v,,ould be fifty-four (c,4!
in the deve,1111.oprnent. Mr. FAWIrnan also stated that since all of Main Street has,
bec.omie predom.inantly cmmmerci;--il pror--�ert.y, it makes this partWar 10ece of
propeW less desirable for reMdential development. He fe. is his development will
Wablish a MY for revitalization of ,.I - epreciatinq by showii-i,-, faith
in the coninuuhty and act. ---is a moral buildor for those who are ur-,certv-iin �,bout the
H
state of aff airs in that part- of' E.tlmss. The type architec.ture, and laindscaping
Wi be used to develop this facility will be quite different then Mat the citizens aire,
accustomied Lo -.ee.inq. i-1e is proposing to build a noranplex that is 0,�S,,ner t."'Cupmd
ho-using rather thian the goverinnient. subsidized housing that Lhe.y are acmusLorfied' to
5eeinq. �.--le stated UnT these new residences will add additional expendir.li-, iner-ii-ne
Lo t&iusinesesses and the shf.-.-ps in thi-, City ,-)f Euless; the taking place of the
old de-,"apidated SNUCUmes thus encouraging thaw of like i,-,rrperties to do the same,
thus knproving the qually of the COMMUlity and Wereasing, civic- pride in Ithe C,'ity
of Wesq Texas. In sumnarn he feels that his fadlRy would upgrade the
neighborhood.
Acting 'Chaim-ion M100ilion asked if tYwre were any additional pr-opor.ents, t,ere being
none tie asked fr-ij- any opponel-its.
Mr. K K B21.1. 116 e,--ives Cou!-t. stated thrit rental properties in this neighborhoo-1
could contribute to degradat-ion of the property sui' thic-,. ne ighibn rho oil, He also
r iferated his opposiHon to t.i%.i8 zoriing change For the reasons at the
eaNbr P & Z mmebnq when 'Mr. -Halknan first b-i- 11have this proporty
rezoned. He Aso subrnitted Lo the Camrnissinn a letter to the
property omers by Mr. Hallmian.
N✓Ir. Tirn ` h.-iw, 609 Cannon, stated that an apartment mmplex would only decrease
the value of the pri:)perty and rzfiC improve it.
1�3i"t t: #'ii'i'E` - €3lfini3ln� it j?ilii"tt. f._ mi-ni'usion -° i,ti✓'L'E'2{ibe--r - 983 1983°!,52
Mr. feri. on #%,l£)nr ;eq 608 .,<;nnon Dr'., stated that We extra Y.r<,#'fi. that t^ft312 d be
generated l y Y.i;E'SF; cill"trt?21E?rit,i' LnlilEilCl rttlt t7F. £ tai")t} `tar #?£' i-ieit;fi#>{J{#-ir'3£J{ ,
There being no r3ddManal opponents, ;Acting C.II.airirian •'VIC." 1i'llon E lo,£'£.l the
Mi'. Ty, in Paske c 1 Y f3_e opposed to this zoning
c#-ta::: t.: t3 sti=:r3d, .;ix€:e, n 6; stood
in o1:)tJo iHon t£3 ti"ies ZElii?i'2: change.
st ate£.l that LJiI n this, t_.ast: i^icis r: rit_f i£3cill' rc.sE';ter-,', t.€le'ti # a.G ,_.._€�;E=`.C# for
FT-5 density Eumi .?t Wat t£i'E?? P & Z felt: that a r£1£.i�'h 1f:ssi�r density -%ijo.uld be £i1or
beneficial 'to the area.
<Y'1r. Tyson stated that he felt this Was not the Mace for 'i Ldt_ farnily. Fie Wither
stated that this is a Very t3e>Rjtiful piece of pr perty and si,.ouid i'E„-23ain .' ti"gle #i:rnily,
Mir.. Cotten stated £.fi&t he felt Single family attached or duplexes +.',wind be ii'ior ,
a, 1ppii£:sii le to this prop :rt f.
l`-'rrs. Park stated that she r1ops not feel that this is an econor-nically depressed area
an.i t,vo ld like t0 keep it, a single family ntr osphere.
Acting Chairri-lan, N'lE'N'liilon ff,€t Oat this was a goLid project,. acid cr--mld be an asset
f"£1 the "ilillii it :iY.V, but not at thi s ICtE citlL�i1.
Acting Chairman lvl£:l"/lillon iilf.i'f3Cli-i£'f' t a letter of opposition front J'nhn Lyn.-Ii, Wand
i;i;-2tl ) £t. 3 part f?Y the r£lini.ites.
fAr. tcott-.en £:`it=31#C a rnoti^vn to :ecounnend denial. of Zoning C_.ase 4-24.
l\N... Park seC£5r2£'.e the r3iobor4 and the vote 5 as follows:
Ayes: Mrs. i pia:(: T}ictl'l, tvlctvlillon C cotter;
Acting C_:hair£i-ian N-lt_MLI'l.on declared the motion £., trrie-d.
(The f.ori'missi:;ri took a. 5-(riint.ite break)
Ill.
H .ARJI.NG - LONU,41G CASE 77426 -- Rl:.i:J E5T OF' C3[y;_ :T t: ` C)P-. A
i.;IN ITIACTS 6B, LSE & i',F, f l".11 I l"# i' _t' y
Tr.-J nT f,-,•'f 115 /"1-1-\t._.l. # l\f-1 \'! R-'l l t &Gq AL.iC LAJ i-..-D ON THE
C.,i..i•.�i^�#.-�\ V-�.' kl•l.'. :NV UN STREET AN-11i� #...1.^'�#�?t:`�v'(,R-I- EIR E !,.i,iD I`---I Riti E..il
...........................__.. �____�..__.._......."..".-..-
AcUng {:'hairEiiari #.€ fv?illori opened the pubLic hearing cai'2Cl that the
proponents �1oAd be heard first and #its.. the Lppionents.
i-
Nlr. Robert 3 500 Dak Lam, Dallas, with Mac:lay Cram :..ompardes, presented
e h`;i?"ge of zoning. # stated tl at thrz., purpose .'f this rezoning`ii5 ,C;LJE'St f£si' ci _ e �; i.`:,
to re'zor. ' these three lots into commercial property mith the intention f developing
2 neiijfit orh-.£3£3£.l sh£ l,pinq facility with a Kroger. Flo stated that they h.nd looked �,t.
Dage,four - Planning & Zoning
Arnnussion - December 6, 1963 19B3-53
.............................. ..............................................
variou"- other sites for their developrnent, such as the property at the nortlhit--.--ast
Conner oF • idviay & Main, however, this site felt by Unie carnq)any to be at the
5 '7 thf -Ikrket and that if nir-,,ybody came.- in v,ith a ne�w fa"c"ility th-ey
;o,.Ai-. end o' r-
WOW be ovedooked. Tho, property at Cheek Sparger Road was not consi-J.'ered, sWf,
the funds for buikHng this road are queshanable and will be quite expe iFive. The
nortAheast corner of %`x Main which has a S-i-op-N-Go at "this location only •--iias.
a depth of 300 feet whielh would not be enough for Hie-4, facility, The property to
the northwest which is owned by the Vantage Company has a major qlas transmission
line that crosses that Ate and woulcl-I'l n-iake the development of this prujoct more
diffic;-ilt. Therefore, they settled on what they felt, would be the hest area. for their
cl-,:�velo.pnient, the soutnea-st corner of Main & Harwood. Mr, Carlin Felt-, that this Was
the .r.-`::t locatiori for such a i--ie explaVed that t',.ey had with sonic' of
the horneowners In the area and he discussed so,,ne of the cnn-m-tents that they had
req,e;.-r-dinq heavy lighting, dunipsters late at rdght, property values and traffic.
f---Ie- alsi-.I a through struet on the tract of Ia(-jd just north of the ',,N' mdcreek
Addition in. which they would build homes on both sides of the t-1,,rot gh.. with
the hou-se,,; on the riorth side:,, of it backing up to the center. They also anticipate
to have along the back side of the center a six or eight (6' or W) .rreening
fence.
Acting Cl--.-airman "AcNU`J,.-.-.-n ,-.iskEKl for any additional proper-tent.-, there being
asked for any opponents.
Mr, Plk'il N,;orrissey, 303 Stoneycreek, spoke in oppi::sition of U-.is zoning. change. Hie
WAN that his main concern the devaluatioin of the property and the
vacant W space already in, Euk--,s5. Mr. Morrissey further presented a Otter from
Pat Clideon, Who COW not be at the meetKy twit is in opposition to the zoning
change.
fAr. Kevin Kalley, 763 Adereek; NN. Steve 1"Ro'ber-L,,, 20-5 "Aoneyereek.; Mr. Don
Seagraves, 766 Blessing i-.-,,oek; Ms. Beth FredsWom, 814 Rock. Creek Dr., aind Elaine
Priest, 117 Stoneyereek, stated their opposition to this zoning ,---nd that they
do rwt twileve that a shopping center is what. this area nee-i-JI.S.
Mr. EIHI Hoover, 954 K Main stepped forward to he heard a proponent,
that he had lived next to stwh a prQect and had no pf-oblerns with it of any kind.
lurther stated that a project would benefit this area.
Mm Tyson asked Mr. Hoover to show the where lie • ves and if
cumendy has a contiact with the developers to sell his prop,-,rty.
Mr. 1--ioover showed the Commission the location of its property. which is just soutih
of the proposed zoning change, and stated that he does have a contract with the,,
dieveioper to sell h'is property.
PArs. Pa,,-k asked if the selling (if his property was mmtingent (in the approval of the
zoning change.
Mr. stat. ,-! the selling of his property vJ11 not depen' the z-oning chan ge.
weirs g appuved.
Rich, --, & Df Ime Ke
ai", -,,No ndall, 816 Blessing Creek, stated their qaposition to Lhe zoring
change and also stated that they represented all the people of Wcodcreek.
Acting Ch�--iirrnan MeNlillon asked all those opposed to this zoning elhange, to staniA.
Approxhuately 30 people stond in oppo3ition.
Paqe Five - Rj,3f-jninq c'�.
Decemiber 6, ,983 1 -5-15
————---------------------- .........
Mr. Tyson asked for anyone in favor of Uds zoning change to stand. -Two pieople
stood in favor of this zoning change.
k1irs. Park & Mr. Catten stated that they were baMeal.-y nipposed! to this ;..,o.ning:
chan-..�:e du" to 0,.-e Fact th",it the northwest comer of Harwood and NDrt'-.. ✓lain Street
is a ready zoned for
Mr. Tvsr.m stated that A, fei"11, thi-e biggest concer.,,. was the traffic. HE�
stated that the re is already a traffic probl".1ern nt I'-,Ia!1--.- & The
is too small needs to he opened up. This developrnenL vvill actuafly give 0, fifteeE ,.
foot (151 right-of-way iFor l`,,,c,.,in St;.,e-et and that this wiII have 8 tendency to op.en that.
intersection up. There are Aso plans by the C.,-,t.y to siqn,-.flize -Harwooc! e<
1,Aain There lore he feet that this dovdolmnent will be an asset to Main
St vet as far as the traffic i-,-, concerned. Alsn he felt that the buffer area they are
to put in wcju-,;,--" help the noise leveL The developer Aso plans to put urp
a small to keep the trash froun going kuto the yards of the Woodereek hurnes.
Acting Chajrr-rt ain M.--cMillon agreed with Tyion. and felt that the
wof ,;td be rnore than adequate.
There being no additional opparwnts, AeUng ChArman McWlon clo.-,ed the PLTh.-C',
hearing.
Tyson emade a rnotion to recoaunend approval of Zoning Case !,i,426.
seconded the miaLiori, and t.he vote is as F,_:Ilwvvs:
y e-s. Mf-,�ssrs. N/k.,.N/Iliflori & Tyson
Nays. f:'ark & Nlr. Cotten
Due to the n-lotiun in a tit? vote, lvt. Cotten made, a rn-iot.lon to taole Zoning
Case #426, without a public heo...-ing, i.intil the, meeting of 20, 1983.
W-s. Park seconded the moUnn, and th,e vote h as Wows:
A y e s., -Nilics. Park 6. ;N/lessrs. 'Tysoi-1, m"'Millon
a ys No.-n(,
Acting MeMillon clecd,-.ired the motion c'-wried.
(The CommisNon took is 5-n-Inute break)
Chairman Deithloff arrived at the meeting at 9:20 rune and Aching Chairman
k1u."AiHon Lurned thie chair over to hirn'.
tvIr. Cot en lei the meetiniq at 9:20 p.m.
Page Ax - Plannigm & Zoniny Commission - December Q 1983 19 8 3 A 5.5
V.
PUBLIC HEARE',IG - ZC;NING CASE 0125 - REQUEST' OF DON DAVIS Faf-�,
7 ------- OF Z(-)NfF:J-',-T-'k*4...TP-ACTS 5-.Bi i
If- Tt,,AENT. lf-T., F:OR A
0 JASPER SURyqy.,. '.'.'-)F 27.771 H-U)NI
R.1 & TO C-2 6< F.-C)IR AN OFFICE E STC!\AC-�&-.-
C ATC-rj...C-N. -71-1E C
STREET
-............
Chairman DeitlAoff openeo the putdic hearing and explained that the, proponenits
would be heard first and then the opponents.
NIP. 1--luey Ball, t-•uey H. Ball & Associates, Inc., First State Bank Building, Bedforel,
representing "OndfaU InvesbPent, Inc, presented the case for i-Ie stated
Lhnt after he had submitted his request to the WILy. he had met with the -ev".i,.ers of
the property, 'These property owners had requested of h4n to Fnake
certaki changes K his plam Therefi-.)re, hie, was requesting of the that
they consider this new proposd raHmr then the one they had received in their
packets.
IVII-P, Ball presenLed to the P & Z com?lnis, on a-!e-i the what they propose
guild on th-its property. {--Ie stsed that they are rwon,"sing to come in Witt1 a forLy•
eigil,it foot (48') private drive from the heewn"". He further stated that there is
23T• 00 square feet of office space anticipated and 123,60,.1 _q;-:are feet of buniness
ildi
sp,.,-Ic�'- represents abo.-_it 4055 of the site covered by bu, nq , -e t--le
., af
did howeveir, that. ordy office, sales and showroom. space would face the
neighborhood and Met no WAMSS Storage Would face Lh-,-, neighhoH-3ood. They
aire r.---roposinq ,, six foo,--. •60 fence with along the southern property tine,
north of the WNW fantly aTea. At this tirnie. Lh.,,y to put the fence.- on
-le -1t. in o ---�r f ive, the
easen 'r 7-ck -o q- --, , homeowners to the south an addit-ional f1ve feet of
easement for their re, r }'`rd.
N& Tyson asked the reasoning behind -Ball- changing the site plan,
NIn Ball stated that all changes Mey made were cm nt.ternpt. to work with the de."Jr.`
of the property owners.
Chairman i--)eithloff asked if there were any additional there heing
he asked for any oppone.-its.
14" David Brown • g, 190-5 KyneLte, representing apprrxirnately 75L',,,f, of the horne•
owners o!"! Kynette Drive, emphasized Uh.,--, willingness I-.If the nei-jib •rhood' to, give up
Me 11-1 zondig and Wey expressed thAr desire to have this property developed as e.
Pla D e in -r -�t with adequate huNers between the uses.
. I mm d ,v f?J .p� .e! -
Kh. Browning pawed out a list to the Commission containing the followhiq
that ffiey wish to be incorporated in the propos;---11,
the wall "Aning Nnie southern edge of developnnent be
of masonry or concrete constructio-n the wali be a. minirnu.rn height
o eight feet V);
Thcit Drive 'b, ahandoned and c,i(jsed prior to the
and that inn -,nnstruchon access be allovred through this
St, eet;
D
,ygy,yevnin - F�Ilannincj & Coirnrnis��Jon - [December fS, 19�0 1983-156,
...........
S. That exterior illumination for the development be desigric-,d so that no
hghL spiHs onto adjacent resrdewRial property, wid that no glare fron
hi g h fixture be visible;
4. That all existing wees oF six inch (6",; caliper nr Wrger Win twenty-
five fc,(-A t'Z5"!, of the south property line I.-!e protected regained,
t',-,at. they be suppl(-ernen',red with additional planit-Jings of trees and shr;A--s
(?d. fc
, ffie:e to !--)e specified on Lhe� plan;
5. That a ncJnjc-r-.;.ii-n setback of eighty fF f,-,t (W), be along the
southern edge between the propeay Une and the face -of the first
bUlding;
6. That the two single star), office buddings shown on the east.ei-n end of
the development be relocatc,,d along the scut-here, edge; that these sarne
buildings contairi no warehouse space, business storage sp-jce;, or loading
docks, tha- t. these buRdir, be equahy fenced on all -,i-des and that the
be Ihnited to to total height of fifteen feet (15',, if they are fliat rooft:d,
or twenty feet (201 to the highest ridge lirie if pitched -,o;:)f; and
7. Mat if any bulldbys cmitaining busiriess storage spoce present a fnce to
the soudwrn property Emige ir-.- the sarne genieral plane r3,, the buildings in
t-ern h;6. that Lhey ConTrise, U than 25% of the totai buildiwq frorit.-ge
Wong the soutUtern edgy that they orient the pedestrOn front door ske
to the south; that the southern facade of si-ch buildir..,gs co.-nply wit,", the
same I• Qht reAMLinns as those ,�tated in ftern 1,10; that no loading a•teas
-n the souLhern edge; and that no dimat access to
or docks. be visit-!.te frof
loading zuras be allowed from; any, drives accurArq along the southern
edge.
Mr. Browni,-,q
I `:t ?ti that if the above conditions werer incorpor,,--iteo into the Planned
COVelopmenn th",at, t "'.or-neowner's Would not expre any
Cl---ajF,rn,i- n Deithloff 3sk(-,,d for a show of hands of aUl those, opposed to thie, �Oning
change as presented. Approximately 18 people raised their ha in upposition..
Mr. Ball addressed the it erns, Uh.2t the han-ieowners p-iesented-
L Itiemi #1 -- He feels that an eight foot C89 fence is an
requesn but `:-ill corisent to it if the P & Z so states. He v,;ould' hikc-, fmr
the screening fence to be mto-r- cor-npatible to the project.
Ph agmes MY the request to ahanch-.-n Mk--sa Drive and th,,.it
no constructJon access be allowed through this street.
.3. Itern. #3 - He agrees witki the request that exteri.,-,w lights be designed so
that no 111,ight, spills, onto adjacent res.idF-.-,ntJaJ property and th,-A no
from hiiqh hrightness fi>,tu •es visible a mJ vvdl strive with all Mgence
Lo design the project thusly.
Paq-
Eiqhl, - F�Ianr-mq A, Zoninq Comr-nission - F)ecernber 6, 19IB., -157
. .. . ................
a. Rem #4 - He feels that the reqxst to retain all ex!,--JJng trees Lhlat are
Vve Set (251 of the
of six inch (60 caliper or larger Whin nr twenty
,?ouUh- property line be protected K an -easonahle reque-st, as it-
come rQht in the Addle of a buiAding.
5. it--:m He agrees witin the requf�--A that a. {-ninirnuni se.-t.bauk of
feet -80') be rnaintained along the southern edge between the properVy
We and the face of the first budding and et.inipliud with it.
ltt,,rn #6 - He feels that this iS On MrCasonable request. 1 his request
does not recognAze the reed to develop Arculati-on on the prope-pty. He
F
A tlne-'y have developed a good circulation pattern to serve the
needs of US property and the funchor that they arc-, trying to de-siq.,fn.
1--ic further stated that they have complied with what the property
owners to the south have asked; they have faced the family
property ommers with notfAny but Wce, shmvroom and oaJ.-5-,.s He
'aLed that he does not ward to he tied down to height Hmit.
also st
;Ar. stated that he felt that due to the recant changes that have been made
and the lack of We to review these changes by staff and the Commisdun, this
partWar case lends itself to be tabled until further review can tie rn,-.ide, which
`Oult, 1--le felt the property owner"',
L�?ould be the next P & Z meeting on Docember 2
have not had adequate We to review tWs rwvi site plan and *11,hat IAr. has not
had adequate to review the property 01^J3IC'I'S CORInler-It'.. With therTI.
Knight stated thot two w,:,eks would be ample time to nuview new s. e
plan at :itch f level; inowever, ini,-' corn-i-nerif cr.11.31-r-I be made on the plan here tonight
staff haF in-ot h id the Lime to review it.
Mr. Ball asked that if they were delayed untH the ne-,J P & Z rnee-ting, U.'-.e.y
- - I tA - --jr -� i
-ould still make the first reaAng of the City Counicil seeting of J� ivafy l0th. f
approved.
Mr. Knight. s',talied they prot)ably cran-dl not miake, the January even
if the Com.-n-i-ission made a decisiork tonight.
141. Ball stated that would Put the project. in jeopardy.
hAr. David Brown0g, an architei-.t, stated that nothing tha .hey ba-ve here
tonight is unre,-;sc.inabie.
NAn Tyson OIL that one of the innin rojncernS of Lhe homeowners is visu'-d access
frorn thek- what they are gaing to see when t.hey go out into their
backyard, and that 'Ndr. Elallll rs clres this is-sue.
f%Ar. M--Nlillon rn�ade a n-i-ohon.. -'--o table Zoning Close #425 until the 083,
fmeetinq and that the public hearing remain open.
W. Park seconded the inotion, and the vote I as follows-
e S: Mrs. Park & Niesus Tyson, Deithloff, McMillan Or Cotten
�'-Jone
Chairr-nan Deithloff declared the motion carried.
Paqe NIF , P.Innninq & ,�t3Af,q, CJFTmision E�=cer�bi r y
1:£ t384 i�
Chairman Dpkthoff asked to have 8 copy of the, minutes sent to _)avid E.)mw?--.?ng,
`.� � '£ �)t'1Vi=; --;f;t`lf';l'v'JF ers.. ;-association, and 1--lu"y' Ball.
V.
Th%',F`e being .',-,usiness to discuss. E:h meeting 10:1.5 p.rn.
fflafl