The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984-03-20 1984-027 AGENDA Planning Zoning Commission 201 N. Ectoy: Drive Euless, Texas March 20, 1984 7 :00 p.m. Pre-Commission Meeting to Discuss Agenda Item, 7 :30 p.m. - Call to Girder for Commission Consideration of Scheduled items INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES -- Regular Meeting Jaied March 6, 1984 I. PUBLIC HEARING Replat:ting of Lots 12--16, Indic€C 16, Cedar Hill Estates into Lots 120, 1282, 13PI , 13R2, 14R I , 14£02, 15R1 ; 15R2, 16R.l., and 1682, Block 16, Cedar Hill Estates, located north and adjacent eni: t:o South Pipeli.nn Road, east of Cannon Drive, south of Sunset Drive and west of North Main Street. 11. PUBLIC REARING; Zoning Case 484-04 -- Request of Fox Electr:ic.. Company for a change of zoning aii a portion of Block 2, Tucker Addition, 4,678 �a_�d , from Planned l:°"E4lo-k➢32:ent for Office/Retail to C-2, located rust. cmd adjacent to I+;ctor Drive and north and adjacent to Huff tan Road. ` III. PUBLIC HEARING Zoning Case ?84-05 - ReCiuest. of Jim Culbertson for a change of ;;i>?'k.?ng on 3, Rai' Shelton Addi ion, 4.697 acres of land I from a CUDI for `.own€lomes to R-3, located north and adjacent: to .€'ar600d Road , west and adjacent to Harwood Park Tow homes, and east of North Main Street:. 1984-028 Regular Meeti.ng Planning Yoain 'o g rrn I S S 10 171 �O. 1984 CALL TO ORDER The I—Vilar mueet-ing o-f thc,. :Planning & Zoning Comm,.c;sion was- called to order at 7.30 i-T; the Ca"incil Chambers of rliless City If-all by RCIb:Crt MEMBERS & STsUF PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT ................ ................ Ro`-)e r t c!14 i I I Jack Hill John xcl I_arolyn Park Sau.-i Cotten James Kmuht, City Eiiai.ne.(-ir Jahn D;si.n,Loff ]?Rod Ty I e I Sellior Planner Becky Null, Developmim,m: Coordinator v I S I Rs .1 vy, "laurice co,".rnd Jack Terry Helen L. Cmirad Bill Coxti_s w a r d L e f,,j i.s Ronald Dupree Ed Cole Paul Goetz m,z c h a e I Rossetti. ja-va Cockrell E21 i z a 1)e t.1-1 ,}o-Wiley Judy Schrank Ronnie Scbrartk Robf:,rt Kawalski. Leila Morriz, t"iliie Mae mccomick INVOCATION' ,I;e invocat-ion was giveti by Mr. Carl APPROVAL OF The rnlnutes of thi:� regular meeting dated March. 6, 1984, were approved as wrItten. 1, PUBILIC, 11EARING Or- LOTS 12 - 16, BUX,K 16, CEDAR HILL 1"IS-TATE,:S INTO ................. ............... . ... .................................... ...................... ----------- i-IOTS 121s.1 , 12P2, 13R2, 14R2, L RI , 15R.2, '10RII , and 16R9, KLOCK 16z. .................... . ...............- CEDAR ESTATPES, LOCATED NORTH AND ADJACEINT TO So-OTH PIPI"Ll-INE ROAD, EAST OF .................... -----....--------------- ::v -N-0114 PITRIT V,E, SOUTH OF SUNSET DRIVE, AND WEST OF NORJ14 HAUN STREET ................. ......... -------..............— Vice-Chairmati McMiJloo op---_:ne-d the publiic hearing :nd e/plairt A t:he ruffles ';over tlhe hearing. MI.. . poniard shoL i:,wner, stated that the property was orig--nally plattad for A ' D c:i13Fle� faMiIV detaCiFted h(;33)e8 ;'he property was, r��.c.(mtly rezened to CU 1- 3 8i;i le V`�Ifili.lv Attanched Di,,,elli.ngs, and im order to utili-ze the. property, it h.as to be replaued. Ltyv Two - Plannin & Zoning Commission - March-20,0984 1984-029 Mr. Tyson noted that access would be from the rear of the property. He then asked Mr. Shotwell if he would include a note on the plat stating that there would be no access allowed from South Pipeline Road, Mr. Shot ell agreed to the request . Mr. McMillon asked if there were any other proponents. There being none, be asked for any opponents. Mr. Ron Dupree, 908 Cannon, asked what type of dwellings will be constructed, Mr. Knight explained that single family attached units are similar to duplex units except. that there are added wall construction requirentents and a IoE: line platted down the center of the unit to allow each sick, tf> be sold individually. Mr. Jack Terry, 115 Sunset, had questions regarding the access and the size of tin,:. un&ics, . fie felt this reel.atting will downgrade the area. He there would be little yard left with the access and parking area in the rear of the property. Mr. McMillon explained that this was not a zoning issue; that the property is currently zoned for such use. There being no additional opponents, Mr. McMillon closed the public hearing. Mr. Tyson stated he favored the replat because it lent itself to individual. 07 ownership. Mrs. Park and Mr. McMillon agreed , Mr. Tyson made a motion to recommend approval of the RepLatting of Lots 12 - 16, Block 16, Cedar Hills Estates into Lots 120, 1282, 13RI , 13-R2, 14R2, 15RI , 1582, 168I , and 16R2, Block 16, Cedar Hills Estates as presented with the additional requirement that a note be placed on the plat stating there will be no driveway cuts allowed onto South Pipeline Road. Mrs. Park seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes : Mrs. Park, and Messrs . Tyson and McMillan Nays : None Vice-Chairman McMillon declared the motion carried. PUBLIC 1c.'(EAR1NC -- ZONINIG CASE '84-0-/f RE 'U�E.ST- O�FFOX ELECTRIC COMPANY POR A .................. CHANGE OF ZONING ON A PORTION OF BLOCK 2, TUCKER ADDITION, 4.67 ' ACRES OF LAND, F,"00-•" A-PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR OFFICEIRETAIL TO C-2, LOCATED EAST AND ADJACENT TO ECTOR DRIVE AWHOW21i AND ADJACENT TO HLIFFMAN ROAD ................. ...... Vice Chairman MeMillon opened the public hearing and asked if there fwa someonf:�. representing the zoning case. Page Three - Planning & Zoning Commission - March 20, 1984 1984-030 Mr. Paul Goetz, 14UO W. Abram Street, Arlington, presented the request , giving -3 history of the property. He stated that the owner, Fox Electric Company, had purcbased the property under the assumption that it was zoned C-2. They ar,�,. requesting C-2 zoning to allow a greater variety of uses. Also, they felt the C-2 zoning would be compatible to the adjacent C-2 zoning. 10. McMillon asked for any additional proponents. There being none, he asked for any opponents. Mrs. Jana Cockrell, 207 Reaves Court, President and representative of the Euless junior High PTA, stated their reasons for opposing the zoning request. They are concerned about the possibility of a restaurant that sells al"Tol going in next to the school . They are not opposed to commercial use cni the property; however, some of the G-2 uses would be detrimental to the adjacent school , As long as the property is a PD, the P & Z Commission and City Council has the right to decide what will go in, Mx. Bill Curtis, Principal of Euless Junior High, represFnaing R-E-B ISD, stated his concern about how the property umuld be devel,_)Ted. Ile was opyned to straight C-2 which would leave the property open for many undesirable types of uses. Mr. Ed Cole, 1.210 Hillerest, stated his concern regarding the possibility of uses incompatible witb the adjacent school and increased traffic along the property, citing the fact that the school children walk home along the Ixtx^-perty. There being no additional opponents, Vice-Chairman McMillon closed the public hearing. Vice-Chairman McMillan stated his concern regarding the type of use that could go in next to the school and across from the City Hall Complex. Mrs. Park agreed with the opposition. Mr. Tyson stated his preference to YeVIeW PLanS if We petitioner has a specitic use in mind. Mr. McMillan agreed. Mr. Tyson asked Mr. Goetz if the petitioner has specific plans for the p,'roperty' W mentioned the possibility of tabling the request if the petitioner could come back with a development plan. Mr. Goetz stated that his client does not have specific plans at this time, lie stated he would have to talk with his client and inquired when this case would come back before the P & Z Commission if tabled. Mr . Knight explained that there is a twency-one (21) day deadline, and that it: smuld be better to withdraw his request , which would make him eligible for a 50% refund and come back with a development plan for Planned Development zoning. A 1 Mr. Goetz stated that he could not withdraw tonight without discussing that dc:. lion with his client who was not present. f2ge Four - Planning & Zoning Commission - March 20, 1984 1984-031 .......... Mr. Tyson made a M.OtiOn to recommend denial of Zoning �M--04 as preiiitnt:ed. Mrs. Park seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes : Mrs. Park, and Messrs. Tyson and McMillon Nays: None Vice-Chairman McMillon declared the motion carried. (THE COMMISSION TOOK A FIVE MINUTE BREAK) PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING CASE 084-05 - REQUEST OF JIM CULBERTSON FOR CHANCE OF ---�fd "f*�_-K]" ON A PORTION bf-TRACT 3, RAY SHELTOK5'UE 11 -N, 4.697 TER Z DI ISIO AND, FROM A CUD FOR TOWNHOMES TO R-3, WATEID NORTh AND ADJACT',NT TO HARWOOD R(?Al), WEST .....--------------------------------- -E' 'ES, AND EAST OF NORTH MAIN STREET AND A-DJAC NT !'0 H)�.,.RWOOD PARK TOWNHOK Vice-Chairman McMillan opened the public hearing and if there was sonwon-ii'. present to represent the zoning request. There being no one to represent the zoning request and no proponents, Vice- Chairman McMillon asked if there were any opponents. Mr. Ed Cole, 1209 -]ill rest stated he was opposed to the straight R-3 zoning. Re. -preferred purchase type units instead of rental apartments. Mr, Tyson pointed out that the current sire plan is dill ed into lots so they can be sold. He asked Mr. Cole bow he felt about condominiums that share community open space. Mr. Cole said be preferred that to the apartments. Mr. Knight stated that under our ordinances , condos cannot to treated different from apartments, The petitioner would have to go PD witb a detailed site plan. After discussion among the P & Z members on how to insure that the units would be condominiums instead of apartments , Vice-Chairman McMillon closed the public hearing, Mr. Knight pointed out the differences between the town homes which have a minimu-m lot size and house size, and the condos which have no lot lines and units the size allowed for apartments, Mrs. Park made a rnotion to recommend denial of Zoning Case #84-05 as Mr. Tyson seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes ; Mrs. Park and Messrs. Tyson and McMillon Nays: None Vice Gbairman McMillan declared the motion carried. Commisjion_n h 20, 1984-032 _nlyyh 20, Mx. Tyson stated that if the petitioner decides to come back before the P & Z Commission, be needs to present a site plan. IV, ADJOURNMENT ....................- There being no Further business to conduct, the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p,m, 4 Chairmau