The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984-04-17 1984-038 AGENDA Planning & IoninY Cor?irarission 201 N. I:ctor Drive Euless, Texas April 17, 1984 7zOO p.yn? .Pre -Con-imission Meeting to Discuss Agencha Items 7-30 p.m- - Call to Order for Commission Consideration (if Scheduled Items INVOCATION APPROVAL O F Regular Veeting Dated April 3, 1984 11 CO SI11 l", PLATTING Cc?mt?inetI Prf,Ii-nirtar"y and Final Platting of Lot l., Block 1, Picadilly Circle, It?ented south and adjacent -to Harwood Road, east of No, Min Street and west of Midway Square Addition. LT. CONSIDER PLATTING Final Plattimg- of Tr'ailw od Addition - 3rd Filing, located north and adjacent to 1'r'�ril.yvood Jarrvc and east of Little, Bear Creek Park. III. CONSIDER PLATTING Cmy;,a.ined Preliminary and I`inal. I'lattim of Hidden i'allev Townhormes, located W'(rst and ra j€}cent to No. ;�I.ain Street, north of Byer-.s- Avenue and cast of Ilimes Drive, Prelinainary 111,:rt.t.ir?; of Lot I & 2. Block 1, Fitz.ger'al.d Addition -- Phase I. located west ki-ad adjacent to No. Main Street, south of ',AI;;.dw,-Ly Drive arid east of ffirnes Drive. V. PUBLIC HEARING ?orrina Case #84. 0 7 14�;quest of Westem assets NJara;a�;��ment, Ine., for a ___._ change of jor-rir-ri; fror:i I3.--1 to C-2, on Ty ai,-t 3C, SL Matson. Survey, A--1080, I acre of 1 a.nd, located on the northwest eor'ner of West Pipeline Road arrcl Westpark W a'v. VL PUBLIC HEARING Zoning Case 184- 08 - Itlequest of Brodsky/Olpertan Euless Joint Vemtur'e for a crap e of jor n.g frc?rn =, P ,anned Development (Open Space) to C-2, on a portion o Tract 2, Levi Franklin Survey, -il3, 9.665 acres of land., located �v cst and adjacent to No. fdaira Street, north of Tr'ailwood Addition, and south and adjacent to proposed ,'fld-Cities Blvd. 1984-039 Regular Meeting Planning & Ironing Commission April 17, 1984 CALL TO ORDER ................................ The regular meeting of the Planning &: Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Euless City 1-fall by Chairman John Deit.hloff. MEMBERS & STAFF PRESENT I T .-'MB.ERS ABSENT Hobert Me Millon Carl Tyson John Dei t hl off' Carolyn Park Jack Hill Sant Cotten John Lynch James Knight, City Engineer Rod Tyler, Senior Planner Becky N ul.l, Development Coordinator VISITORS Gene Partridge Andy Barrocliff Chris Guinn Paul Jones Jackey Fl.u.itt Kay Fuller Willie Mae McCormick Jaynes Holcomb Ernest Franke Phyllis Mueller Cl-jarles Hunt Heather Mahon Arnold Pent Zane .41a1aori INVOCATION The i.rivocation was given by Mr. John Lynch. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the regular r3neet.ing dated April 3, 1.984, uwe;re approved as written. 1. CONSIDER. 1'.LA`I"1'ING -- C",O�MBINED PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLA'I"1'ING OF LOT -- .................... _ ....... -------------- 1, BLOCK 1, PTC;ADILLY CIRCLE, LOCA'T'ED SOUTH AND ADJACEN'F TO B.AR1"iOOD TOAD, EAST OF NORTH MAIM STREET OF ;-NIH.)WAY SQUA.£I.E ...... --------------------------------A.f1l=�I'I't.0?A'� 1-1r. Jacket' Fluitt, Engineer with Stembridge & Associates, presented the request for platting. -Ie stated he had received a. copy of the City Engineer's letter and agreed with the letter. Page.Two Planning& ----Zoning_ Conimission - April 17, 1984 1984--04th rjMr. A-Ir°Millon made a notion to recommend approval. of the Combined Preliminary and l~ine.1 Platting of Lot 1, Block 1; Picadilly Circle, subject to James Knight's letter dated April. 12, 1984. Pvlr•, Hill seconded the motion, and thf--, vote; is as fol-lo ws: Ayes: Messrs. .AicNlillon, Hill, Lynch and Deithloff Nays: done Chairman Deithloff declared the -motion carried. 11, CONSIDER PLATTING -- FINAL PLATTING OF ` RAIIAW 3OD ADDITION - 3RD FILING, LOCATED NORTH AND ADJACENT TO Tlx.: ILWOOD DRIyE AND EAST OF Eff"'T"IT BEAR. CREEK PARK Mr, knight, City Engineer. stated that the devc:;loper's re-presentative tmas unable to attend the meeting.- due to a scheduling conflict. He stated that the plat has been prepared in compliance with, City ordinances and could be considered by the Commission. Mr. Hill, in de a motion to recomimend approval of the Final Platting of T,;,Iilwood Addition -- 3rd Filing, as presented. 61r°. N'lc 'Ti_llorr seconded the motion, and the vote is as, follovis: Aves: :Messrs. flil , Mc Millon, Lynch and Deithloff 4iys: None Chairman Deithloff' declared the rnotion csr�rr°bc;d. 111. C ONISI.D.11.1t PL.AT°I`lNG, -- COMBINED PR L.I11 EN"Ak Y AND l'`.I1'AL PLATTING OF HIDDEN VALLEY TOl'e NHO eIES, LOCATED WEST AND ADJACENT TO NORTH 0AIN 1�`.I.F+Lf..'l', 1*011..'1'11 Cal` .....'L1i4 AL'FNt;I FtD 1;.A '1 0 F 1Il£62 L�1Z1 'E Mr. James Holcomb, 1700 0ak Greek., Bedford, Texas, representing; the owners, presented tl,e request for platting. Mr. Hill made a rnotion to recornmend approval of the Combined Preliminary and Final. Platting of Hidden Valley `l'ow nhomes:, subject to James Knight's letter dated Aril 12, 1984. L��ncli seconded the i-nation, and the vote is xis fc)llo�rds: Ayes, ?lvlessrs. Hill, Lynch, and Deithloff Nays: None Chairrnar� Deithloff declared the motion carried. Page Three - Plariningr & Zoning, Commission - April -17, 1984 1984-041 . .... ..... ................-... --------------- IV, CONSIDER PLATTINO PRELIMINAI'tY PLATTING OF LOTS I & 2, BI,Ocf� 1- .................................. ............... ERA-LD ADDITION- - PT-IASE 1, LOCATED WEST AND ADJACENT TO NORTff FITZ(';'- .I.Al.N-STREET, SOUTH OF MIDWAY DRIVE, AND EAS'T' of 5"ff"N'T---------------------------- ....................................... Mr, Ennest Franke, Enginee •, 201 Walnut Way, representing James Fitzgerald arld James Hogan, presented the stating that proposed plt-itting was for a planned b K-flobls Restaurant. -,Mr. Lyne-h made a inotion to recommend approval of the I'rellnminary Platting of Lots I & 2., Blcwl\- L Fitzgerald Addition. -- Phase 1, as preser►ted. Mr. MeMlillo-n seconded the. motion, and the vote is as follows- Aves: Messrs. Lynch, McMillian, Hill and Deithloff Neys: None Chairman DeithlolN` declared the motion carried. V. RUBLIC H-E�ARXNG - ZONIN(--4 CASE #84-07 - REQUEST OF WESTERN ASSETS ................ .1-1......................................................................-- MANAGEMENT, INC., FOR A CHANGE OF ZONING FROM R-1 to C--2, ON TRACT MATSON SURkTEY,'-'A...160,�........f....-XC*1i-'R*--6'P------ Nlblff -dfF'-1vftST PRUPELINE ROAD AND -W.E.S T.PARK WAY ................................................................................. Chairman Deithloff (.,,pened the public herjrbig and e xplained lained that the proponent-s' would if 'here was someone to represent be heard first and then the op.,.,,onents. He asked the zoning request. ,;Vlr, Arnold Peri.t, representing stern Assets stated the roperty is g We P being purchased subject to the zoning change. He also stated that the ownf--rrs find it unsuitable as a single family residence in that location since it is adjacent to prop(-,�yty currently zoned C.-.l and Chairinan Deithlofl' asked if there were any additional proponents. -3 approved, Ors, lay Fuller stated she would like to see the request L Mr, Knight pointed out that a letter was received from Mr. Harold Copher, owner of property within 200 feet of subject property, stating his approval of the zoning re,mlest. There beiimg no opponemts, Chairrrian Deithloff declared the motion carried. lillr. Hill made a inotion to reMrlfflefld apprOV,811 Of Z01"JiDg Case #84-04' as presented.. Mr, Lynch seconded the nnilotion, ar)d the vote is as follows; Aves: lklessrs. Hill, LVYWh, lk-le-114illon and Deithloff N� y a s,- Norio. Chfair-nian declared the motion carried. Pa,l,e Four - Plannino- & Zoning Comrnission April IT, 1984 19844142 ..................................- .................... VL PUYUILIC HEARING - ZONING CASE �84-08 REQUEST OF BRODSKY/OLPERTON .............•......•.. ................. EULESS JOIN'! VENTURE FOR A CHANGE OF ZONING FROM A PLANNED ............ .- BUTE—LOW0ENT (OPEN SPACE) T5.....i�------2...........CAN A PORTION OF TR-A C.T.....2,__LEVI 1-11W RE SURVEY, A513, OF _1A.'ND........GOCATED WEST AND ....................... 1_1................... 1--RE-1 I'TON, AND DJACENT TO NORTI-I MAIN S -T, NORTH OF TRAILWOOD ADDI! ---- ------ S- 'OUTH" OF AND ADJACENT...T(T-P—ROPOSED .. ............. ....................... Chairnnan Deithlocif opened tie public hearing and explained that the proponent.,_-, would be heard first and then the opponents. Chairman Deithloff asked if there :was ,Omeone to represent tihis zoning request. -presen -iternational Investing Advisor,-,,, presented the� s. Phyllis Mueller, vc t ing fi request For C2 at the southwest corner of North Main Street and proposed Mid-Cities Blvd., of 9.7 acres =currently kvith-ixr the flood plain. She stated that the development of this property will be perwing the channelization of Little Bear Creek. I McMillon asked Mr. Knight about the timetrable for ehann.efization. Mr. Knif-71-it stated that ;-here are no current plans for channelization. If the- City were to undertake such a project. it would require a bond election to do so. lie st'ated that a study was completed approxi-mately two years ag,0 on the drainage efwrinel defining the liailts of the 100 year flood plain of 'Little Bear Creek includino- roverrlents, Ile further stated that if adjacent properly ovvners were plalis for imp. ,pilling to construct t"he Channel improvernents to the plans and alignment that the City shows in their drainage sWdy, there would be no objection to that t'vx-, of wori-.- being performed. Mr. Lyneeh inquired if the curvature of the subject property filong the southern bound;nry is tied to the alignment of the Mr. Kniglit stated that the alignment sbov"'11 the zoning request appears to niatch the a'hgnment proposed in the drainage sludy prepared by the City's He stated i 41 - that in order to construct the channel improvemomts proposed in the dr;,Anage study, -i chann(,,) with a tou width of 300 - 350 foot would be required to accommodate, the runoff generated by the 100 year return frequency storm. Mr. Hill asked if the chennelization would generally follow the creek. Mr. Knight stated that it would generally follow the creek, but would be a little smoother. Chairman 1_3eithloff asked if there were any additiori,--il proponents. There being Tione, fie aksed if there were any apporients. "I - t0r, Charle's Hunt, 2000 North Alain Street, questioned whether all the subject property i!urrentl I:es withill the 100 year flood plain. He felt that the single hamily horric �y Z3 be I Owned by the on North Main, east. of the subject property, woiuld cojT-.e isoWted. ,flayt'e: five -- Planning & Zoiiing C'ornmi E.sion AElU11 1934 19841-€4.3 ?IIr. Kr;igf€# stated that al;aiost all of the subject property currently lies within the Itl#� yea€° flood plain. Mrs, I e'ather A'la tort, representing her parents Johnny & Rarnona Walker, owners of Lot 22A in `l'r•ailwood, asked if the rerouting of I ittle Bear Creek would come. ae€oss their property. `Vfr. Knight stated that he had a copy of the drainage study in his office, and would be ojad to go over it with her sometime. N.lrs, V.Ta'on stated tlr,at. their propert > is zoned R-I. and that the. C-2 zoning would aderse;ly affect their property. In response to a question lei' Mrs, li'f.Falaora regirdillIg USe of the lot her ParOnt.-; OWD, A:11r, Knight stated that both her property and the subject property would require either major ch annel.ization or rri.ra,jor fill in order to salvage, either property frsr use. lie pointed out that her property is totally within the flood plain and is currently rendered useless. Mrs, Mahon stated she understood they were not allowed. to fill. in that area because of flooding on. Shenandoah. 'Vir. Knight st A4t` f that if proper c:hanneliza-tion is provided so as to convey the stori'n water runoff. the miles and re,mirations pror.nuigated by the Federal mer��;eney ri1,,.tiagennent Agency,- ,:dlo,,v fill within the floo-dway fringe areas, but does, ricat allow fill within the fl.00dw€iy proper Iles would have to look at the hydraulic report to determine if their property is within the floodm.,ay fringe; or .floodway, Lynch e pl.a.i.riecl €-hat in Order to make any improvements in the floor. plain area., it will take, substantial .i.inprovernent:! over a considerable length (,.)f the channel. It is not soinethi.rrg ttmt is easily undertaken. Nlr. Kr,ig-ht stated that, at the time of the study, the cost estimate- to protect existing utilities that either parallel or cross the ct eels zamounted. to several hundred thousand dOf-1 a.rs, not including the cost of .improving the channel. At that tinge; it ;;ias not feasible for the City to proceed with T-fle project. Mr. �;arac ;lahon stated tt;£e�J v°ere £'£3rit.ic?�:rin using tI-,c-:ir property t,s i'?rt��re .esi£lential., de�n£lin capon churmelization. Ile stated his concern about the larger rimoff from the subjeel property once it is dru elo prd. Ile warn€e£1 to know whla.t type cif I}?.if 'er zone there: €,Joul.£1 tae between t.Ite two properties. Tr. Knight stated that the only buffer proposed by the zoning request under c:.oirsider ition would be the chz-:mneliz::ation itself, approximately 350 .feet. As far, as the runoff, the few aeres involved are relatively insignificant c oj'npared to the total area within the wate-rshed twhich contributes runoff to this point. The tota_I watershed upstream'. of North Main Street is about 19 square miles. 'Phere being no additional o pponents> C'hrai.rm an Deithloff darer>ar°ed the public Bearing closed, Page. Six - Planning...�& Zonknz Comnission - April 17, 1984 N'84 -044 ...................... cMillor, stated he has reservations regarding rezoning since the chanfielization of -ear Creek, Little fl is going, to be a long term project. Mr. Lynch ifmuired as to how fi-ir dowfistream improvements will have to be rjm�ide. Mr. Knigh-t stated that the drainave report shows that the backwetter from. BI zu Ig f3ear Creek affects, the water surface elevation on Little Bear Creek upstream to nearly the North Nla. D Street bridge. For any rced impact on charmelization dowristream to help this prot*�.rty, it Would have to go i)(,'YOTId the confluence of 13,it, Boax Creek and Little' Beat, Creek. The study does reftect that improvenlents from North INI-nin Street bridge to the west will benefit the adjacent properties. r. Lynch sta"ed he shares Mr. NIvNIHIon's coneern about the speculative nature of the zoning; however,, fir felt the commercial zoning is compatible mth the area. except f for the "Prailwood Addition. N'fr. fucMfflon asked about the future land for that &rea. Ali% Rod Tyler stated, that the future land use designation is permanent comm.unity open Space. 3 J Mr. Lynch asked the reasoning k)r that use, Mr. Tyler stated that it was .9 product of the pr(--wious development plan find also the idea that if channelizat ion became inoi,e conerete, an update of the Future Land Use, Plan would be in order. -m to recommend approval of Zoning Case 184-08 as presented. --t df moti, E'er'. Lvneh mt -Mr. McNRI'llon seconded the motim, and the vote is as 1"011ows., Ayesr Lynch, MclMillon, Hill and Deithloff N l�,;.vs: None Chairman Deithloff (Aeclared the motion carried.. ADJOURN.-MENT Therc, beinry no furtbor business to conduct, the me:eting -idjoumied at 8:210 p.m. If I? iv,