HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-05-15 1984-054
AGENDA
t
Planning F Zoning C;oinmisiion
2111 N. Ector Dive
Etiless, Texas
'k-lay 15, 1984
6:45 p.m. Pre-Commission Meeting to Diseuss Agenda. Itern
,30 1?,rm C;€ill to Order for C orfirnl,,sion Consi:aeration of Scheduled items
IIvTVOC A110N
APPROVAL OF 1;11.1NTDTES Regular i:lee.t.ing 't-Dated May 1, 1984
L PUBLIC 1f 1 A R.MC2
Zoning Case #84-99 W Request of the C;.it�, of Euless for �a change of Zoning
----------------.........-
on a portion of 1'r_ct 3K AJ. Huitt Stirvey, A-709 and Tc?i 3, Alexander-
Cullum Adidition, 1.2 acres of land., frorn .h-1 to C-2, located south of S.H.
183, north of Alexander Larne, ei�st of Call€zr,-: Drive and €,,est of .11l.li��.a_ra
Drive.
IL PUB -C HEARING
:c?r;.ira; Case f,t� _l9 �c€�c�st of lilrlliat-n Syn er for a cd:rig€rge� o€` zoning, on.
Traits SCE, 6M R eft ? and a portion of `I'rac�ts €E, 6x• & GL. S. Huitt. Sump ey,
A-705, 12.8 acres of lam., .fT`orn .R--1 Aj C-2 to I'D for Patio 1`01?ies on th-e
southern portion and a ltaxched condos on the ax?rtl-ac rll poi'tioi-a, 10Cated Dort.h
of Wroc dereelc Addition, east. of North 'M yin Street and south of >';arwoocl
I'(.oF.aaa.
Ifl, (,'ONSIDER, PLA'11'ING. P--84-33
Prel.i nina = flatting of 1-.ia:'a^�t�crci Crossing, loeater n tIa � 4 e{;€'ias;r of
o e :io€a 1.1:e:.
North Tlain Street aiat Harwood Road.
IV. CONSIDER. FLATTING: P--84--31
Dint--al Plattim of Lot 1, Block 1. Fitzgerald Addition, located west and
adjacent to North lair- Street, south of . idv%, y Die and east of Ifi;,fes
Drive.
V, ,CONSIDERATION OF SITE 1 EVET.,C)J'",lt,.N'`I° PLAN ,� PLAT` 'I G, P-84-32
Site Development Plan a Final PlfaAting of Lots 4 & 5, Block 9, <'ilfages of
fk it Cre-ek First Installment., located north and adjt.:cent to Harwood Road.
east and ndjacent to Fuller-Wiser TZoaCd and west and adjacent to Bear' C;a4;r:tt
l'ar kway.
1984-f#5�
VL CONSIDERLATION OF I.}t:V�I LOP111EN T PLAN & PLATTING, P-84-33
Site Developmrz,:nt Plan & Final Platting for Lot 3, Block 6, Village of Be„r
Creek T First Instal]naent, located north and adjacent to ,ash Lane, West. and
adjacent to Bear Creek Parkway and cast of Villages Drive.
VII, CONSIDERATION OF SITE'. DEVELOP",'v'1]'-.NT .I'LAN & PLA I'.ING.- €z--84 34
Site Development Plan & '?inal Platting of Lot 3, .I fw.k 9, Villages of Bear
Creel. -- First Installment, located south and adjacent to Ash Lane, west and
adjac=errt to Bear Creek Parkway and east of Fuller--Wiser Road.
Vill CONSIDER PLAT'FINIG' .11-84-35
Repzatting of 'Tract 2R, 1',estpark Central Addition, into Lots 2.AR & /2BR,
iVes park Central Addition, located erast and adjac-ent to West-'park Way arrd
south amp adjacent to Huffman Road.
lx� CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT POLICY
Consideration of various development policies to bx. ,3dopted to alleviate
futar°e complaints and costs that the City is currently experiencing or
anticipating.
ZONING DISTRICT ABBREVIATIONS
R-1 Single Family Detached Dwelling District
III.A - Si.ngle? Family Attached Dwelling I is rac°t
R-Y2 a- D wellinl; District
R.-3 Multi.-.I{a;milt .I) vell:ing District, .12 'Knits to t.be :here
R-4 Multi-Fa -,ilv Dwelling District, 16 Units to the Acre
R•-5 JI ulti-Farnily Dwelling District, 24 Units to the Acre
C-1 Neighborhood Business District
C-2 Community Business District.
11-1 - Limited Industrial District
1-1 Light Industrial District
I-2 ilerry Industrial Distric>t
CUD - Community Unit Development
PD = Pl!, ned Development
SP Specific Use Permit
11)84-056
Regular Xleeting
Flunf,ii g ;fonif��;•�'Co:�ia;izs i�sr�
L 1.(a 1.5, 1984
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Planning & oning Commission was called to order at 7:30
p.m. in the Council Chambers of Euiess Cite hall by Chair-.man iz?hn I)eithl.oM
n,ii llT3.t:RS & S'IAFF RESENT MEAMBEYS BS.1'aM'
John Deithlof f John Lynch
Robert :McMfllon Jack Hill
C iroly a Fare 5afn Cotten
Curl Tyson
James `Knight, City Engineer
Rod '.r ler, `cmior Planner
Bec kv Null., l:)evelopment Coordinator,
TIS''1'oits
John Bush David Wy ier
Peter Stacks Dennis Jerke
T rad Meyer Ji fn Bell
Bob Peiit Tom. Rutledge
Yon. 'Morris Keith Kretzinger
R. Fries John Morris
Larry 1-lolt Ernest Frank
Jim I"itzgerald Kenny Kafner
Readific, overstreet, Jr, Theda Hogan
R. N. Smith John Johnson
i1
,Mjke v::c enz.re
INVOCATION
.............°------------
The invocation was given 'by :J'Jrs. Carolyn Park.
p 7
I'lic:
minutes 01" the regu.ltir mweting dated May 1, 1984, were approved as written.
l-
1't:'fiLIC HEARING ... ZONING CASE #84-09 - REQUEST OF l'T=fE CYrY OF ET-'LESS
TRACT 3K, A. J. HUITT
A-709... AND l.,L)f 3, Al.,.T'tXANDEI-T.--CUL1,UM ADDITION, 1.2 C-P,".ES �a3"'D 0 I'vi
R-1 Tf -2... OF SAT. 183, KOI?,T11 UP , I.:ANE, EAST.
C}1 [ `•t I LC? l'1 ilil�ik; %i 3£-? 1e-l:�'I' C3T'--INULT..TCAI'4 DRIVE
I�ff opened the public hearing a ;� explained" tTai the proponents �otld Chairm,an Deit:
be beard first and then the opponents.
7
Page Two - .Planning 6, Zon-inn C'ommissiorl 15, 19L4 1984-05,-
Mr. I'lod Tyler, Senior P1,nnner, representing the City of Euless, explained that the
are ell of single family surrounded by C-2 zoning to the north and
subject property is a p
rid future City officps to the south. Therefore, the City is
-4 to the west -a
ea--A, T1
-o C lgi ifito conformity with
reQuesting V
jEtt the subject property be rezone-1 t -2 briz rig it
the surrounding zoning and elir-inating a small packet of R.-I zoning rennaming.
1'htere being no additional proponents or opponents, Chair.-man -Deithloff the
public hearing.
Mr. A-IcMillon made a motion to recommend approval of Zoning Case 484-09, as
submitted.
Mrs. Park seconded the rnotion, and the vote is as follows:
Ayes. Mrs. Park ek Messrs. Deitlrdolf, Tyson, and -McMillor-
Nays- None
Cflair:lmn Deithloff declared the motion earried,
IT.
PUBLIC HEARING, - ZONING' CASE #84-10 - REQUIEST OF •ILLIA-A-1 SNYDER FOR A
.......................---------
CHANGE OF ZONING ON TRACTS esG,. 6C.] &- 602, AND f� PORTION OF TRACTS 6E,
W------------------ C-75
'A I R-.1 .6, V
"OT 61...6B., S. HUITT SURVEY, A-705?, .12.�' CRES OF LAND, FROM
F 0 R.....P:TkTIO" RIORTES ON THE ....N........A....N.....D, I...A...CHED CONDOS ON
------------**...........................
RN PORTION, LOCATED NORTH OF WOOT. YEEK ADDITION, EAS-f
..................I..........................................-----......
OF NORTH MAIN STREET AND SOUTH OF HARW'00D ROAD
......................
Chairman Deithloff opened the public hearing and explained that the proponents tvould
be hear first and then the opponents.
.3 SDrjn,7rridge Lane, Euless, Texbs, architect for Co-Equity
fVl-r. William Snyder, 20'
Corporation, presented the re(�UeSt for re-ZODiDg. He stated that the property to the
north oil the corner of North Main Street and flarwood Was reeently rezoned to C-2,
thus ,urrounding this property with something other than R-J., ffe presented a
development plan for attached condorl-I ill i urn- of, ffie northern, portion next to the C-21
property and detached condonilriums or the southerll -portion next to '.Voodereek
Addition. The request 122 attached units and 30 detached units. The, Site, Plan
as submitted proposes 122 garage spaces and 1721 open parking- s-paces in the alt-ached
M -
eondo area ands.. 30 garage spaces and 30 open spaces ill the detaefied area for a total
of 354 parking spaces for the 152 dwelling units..
Mr.
Tyson asked the developer's reasoning for not alligning tile ingress/ ?v- ess
with the street across. North Main Street.
111-1r. Snyder stated that to align the divided entmance vvritfi Travis Drive would run it off
of their property. Therefore, they tried to put it far enough away to keep from causing
,)roblem&
Chairman Deithloff asked if there were any additional proponents. There being nice.
-v opponents.
tie asked for. n
A-11. John J'Ohr-kSOD, 107 Stony Creek, asked how the easement behind his property would
be affected.
I?ap-e Three - Planning ki---_Zonin f Con 3 n,i ssion. - 1a,% 1.5, 1984 1984-058
Mr. James I�riigl-,t stated that there would be is 7-1/2 foot easement located on. eaell
side of the property line.
There being no additional. opponents, Chairman Dei.thloff closed the pudic hearing.
,Ins. Pa.rl3 stated that she liked the patio home concept and prefers that there be more
patio homes on the soutiiern portion. She felt the pra,kino was ina.dequrite and wants
the ingress/egress to fine rip with the street to the est.
la,1r. Mc°VI lon stated that he agreed with having more patio bones in the Pr�o ect and
lie edso felt that the density, was wo high and thought there would be a problern.. with
the parking.
Mr. Tyson stated that he also was concerned iabout the parking and that he had na
problrrn with the street. riot .lining rip with the one to the west.
, Jaynes Knight st,,.ite=d that he had received a call ibis afternoon advising him of the
possibility of revising the ,a-lifynunemt of the nort.bern boundary next to the corr:mercial.
pvopertvy He inquired or` Mr. Snyder as, to when this would be; done.
• i Snyder stated that he did not know at this time ex,�actly wt:at. the changes will h
however, they will be st.r,aighten.ing out the boundary.
-ir. Knight stated that the zoning Base will have to be considered as the boundary .
presented tonight.
Mr. Tyson stated that tie liked the project and the garden lei+Wigs, but is against the
request because: of the alim-iment of the ingr•essfegress at the western boundary, there:
not being enough parking, and the proposed parking being detrimental to .fire vehicle
access. He further
added tl3z3t lie would like to see the zoning c.zse tabled a3ia� the
problems vvork€sd out before making a decision.
?;.€a•. Snyder stated that in his opinion this type of project is a good transition between
the commercial zoning recently approved on the north, the single family attached on
the south and multi--family Zoning to the e',asL
Mmr. 'Yyson made a motion to re on-mend denial of ;honing Case 'f 81.4 , as presented.
Mm Park seconded the motion, acid U-rc vote is as follows,
ors;
Ayes- I 1lrs. lark & TAle srs. Deithlot'f, Tyson, and %,TcMi:l.lon
Nays: li one
Clra.ir.ii an Deithloff declared the motion carried.
ffl.
CONSIDER PLA'i'�I'I G T 11-84-30 -- l'li.f LLMINARY PLATTING OF l-l."~<R OOD C..... ROSS-
...............................................
IN(.., LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CO.Ti1Vl:R OF NOfi.Tf-1 MAIN S11R.E T AND
Mr, 'dike kIcKenzie with T'oWell 6: Powell presented tile request for Prelir,linary
Platting of the lfarwood Crossing Shopping Center. He stated that lie h€id received a
cop} of Mro Knight`s letter dated tTa.y 10, 1984.
Page Four -- Plannin , U Zoning Co firmsmon -- lav .15, . 984 1984-0,59
Mr. Tyson asked how much of the property in the previous zoning case was contained
within tl�i4 plat.
'Mr, McKenzie stated that the eastern and southeastern Portion Was involved in the
previous zoning request,
Mr. James Kni-, ht stated that this preliminary plat inClua es all of Lots 1, ? 6, 3, and
this developer has indicated that he: will come back at a later date to final plat Lot
2. Lot, 1. &, 3, will. be final platted at some tirfre in thy; future for Whatever the
property is zoned for,
a?.l.rs� Park made a motion to recorr-arr-aend approval fi.t the Prelin-urinary Flat of Ham"Vood
Crossing Addition, as presented.
Mr. Mc-'.-Millon seconded the motion, and the vote is as follolvs:
Ayes: iv' rs. Park, U Messrs. Deithloff, Tyson aarrrl i�tc�it'iill.f3rr
Nays: None
Chairman Deithloff declared the rr;;otion carried.
I4'.
CON—SIDE PLATTIN(---;' -- P-84--31 T FINAL PLAT`T'ING Dl' I.:O 1, BLOCK 1,
---------------- ---------
'ADDITION, LOCATED WEST AND A1:iJACENT TO NORTH MAIN
STREET, SOt3`i-H O.F JL111)i,,V.X DkIit X!�-D EAST OF Ili?iI S t3RW
-1r. Franke, engineer for the owner, presented the request for Final Plaattirng of
Lot 1, Block 1, Fitzgerald Addi ion T .F'laase 1, for the developry rent. of a i—.Bob's
Restaurant.
Mr. James Knight stated that the executed ea-rsernent was received this afternoon and
the plan is in compliance with City ordinances.
.-Mr. Tyson asked the tianctabl.e of fly velopnient.
Mr. Frai*e stated that it would probably be developed by the r:aiddile of A.ar t.ast.
1`{r. 'tic Millon nizi Ie a motion to r=c c°r3rrs.rra.end :approval of the Final. Pl acting of Lot 1,
Block 1, Fitzgerald Addition - Phase 1, as presented.
Mr. Tyson seconded t.ho, motion, and the vote is as follows-
Ayes- Mrs. Park, & Messrs. Tyson, Deithloff& McMillon
Nays. ;;lone
Chairman Deithloff declared the motion carried.
Page Five W Planning & zoning Coninlission May 1,5, 11484 1984-060
..............
V.
DEVELOP1101.�'.N"T RLAN & PLATTING P-84-32
CONSIDERATION OF STTI_`� - SITE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN & FINAL PLATTING OF LOTS 4 & 5, BLOCK
FIRS"I' INS TAL.LMENT, LOCATED NOPTH AND ADJACENT TO
HARW06D ROAD, EAST AND ATTAR_TTWEST
_,'ENT TO BJF�AF-Z _(,�_
A DJ A PARKWAY
mr. Ron Fox & Jacobs, went over the site plan explaining that the plat is for
condom niums and townhomes oil Lot 4, eaeb unit Navin g two stories, and detached
condominiurns on Lot 5. The overall density for the, projeet is 9.2 units per acre, He
pres(-"TI'Le'd various design displays showing the liayout of the Proposed project.
Chairman Deithloff asked klr. ..orris if he received Rod TvlerTs letter dated May 11th,
and if so, to address each item one at a time.
Mr. Morris, addressed Pach variance requested item by item.
ITEM NO. I - 11r. -Morris explained that they are requesting ca twenty-foot (209
....................................
minin-mm setback- from the property line along, the property's northern rno�,-t boundary
Instead of the required twenty-five foot (25") setback-; and a five foot (51) nniniymjm
setback betw,,.,en tile del-ached and attached condoi-ndniuj-as. le stated that thev ,ut a
�,)ropwrty lifila between the attached condos and detached condos due to flhe dj.6er'erlCe
,!rj the h-ofneowner's assoeiation agreei-neiits. There is only one point that 3has" a
T!j j nj fT urn of ten f1cot (10') between buildings along
the property line dividing _Lets 4
3.
FTUl NO 21 Mr. YVIorris stated that. where second. story windows, fa0e windows,
they have a thirty foot (301) spacing- between builldiDr
S. in most. cases where there is
1.$_:M Feet (10'.) separation between buildings, there is one wiridow a htank- waH,
Mr. Tyson asked if the Fire Department had a problem with this situation.
Mr. Knight stated that the Fir(-, Department recognizes, that the City Council has the
authority to approve the site plan as presented and can provide service uride • tbese
conditions.
ITEM NO. 3 - Variance requesting 65% masonry per elevation with no less than 80%.
masonry below the eight foot (8') plate lifle. 'Mr. Morris stated that this request irAll
allow more architectural detail than with brick, fie stated that then o,;fll take 801V*6
masonry "Across the front facade.
1=7vl NO, 4 - Propos�--j] for street side garbage pick-up rather than garbage
e
areas. Mr. Morris stated that they are working with Tarrant. County tA`aste. Disposal
to find a solution to allow street side garbage pick-up. If that is unsuccessful, they
will provide ls';ationary receptacles.
Regarding other items requested in the letter, Mr. Knight stated that the street narnes
have been corrected to avoid conflict; the developer bas sinted that he will co -aply
with the 100 y m,ear return frequency storm as requiested; sand that the. City requires
escrow at the .1 time of exeeution of City; and Jofm Morris,
T•iland Develop -neiit Corporation, liras agreed to do so, The develope submitted a copy
of the Villages of ,ear Creek Architectural Coot of Committee (VBCACC) letter
stating that they are in general compliance with the doevelomnenCs deed restrictions.
Page Six - PI.,annin & Zoning Commission -- 1-1111-,-ay 15, 1984 1984-06
tlr. Kni£ht. stated that all streets will be private and maintained by the homeowne- 's
fassfaekzatieark. H..£= further :stated that the City Council has the authority to approve the
variances upon recomraemdation Of the Planning & ZoninV Commission.
Each of the members stated their r•f.,servations about the variance request regarding the
r?ii-kmimn €lrst.a.nee between structures.
Mrs. Park was opposed to .lowering the rninir-nurn masonry standards and also stated that
she preferred trash dui p ters.
Iilr, `1'vson made a notion to recornmend approval of the Site Development. Plan & Final
Plat. (af Lots 4 u 5, Bock J, Villages of Beam Creek Addition -. first Installn-lent, subject
to the following:
1. Rod Tyler's letter dated May 11. 1984;
2. A minimum of 80% inasonry be required on the front facade and a minimum
of 6,-5 3 frinsonry on the remaining elevations.
3. Method Of garaaEt;e nick.-up being worked out between developer and Tarrant
County Waste Disposal;
4. Pro-rata share for street and utility improvements for Harwood Road
repo. -d prior to the Tiling of the plat.
iQ*r. MeMillon secanfed the motion, and the vote is as follows:
: .yes: A'essrs. N-10illon, 1:)eit.til.o 'f and Tyson
Nl ays: 0 rs, Parrs
Chairman DelthileofSf ydeclared the
tTllli: motion carried.
�T T HIS Tg
."�'�E){ Y Flt4SlCN IO( r 9 BREAK
Yl.
CONSIDERATION OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PL<�l'� � 1'.i.AT�1`ING P-84-33 - SITE
_----._......................................._...-_.... .._._............................–.—
J.E.-VELOI='IMENT PLAN 3: FINAL PLATTING OF LOT 3, BLOCK- 6, WLLAGES OF BEAR
CREEK -.........Il tlj,'S`.I` It�,1'- Al.;.t:11--:*,N'I', LOCATED NORTH AN.I) .4...Y.K4ACl;N- 1 1'0 ASII LANE..
i1'EST -:�i�D ADJACENT TO BEAR l',�lid LAY AND EAST OF `r�TL1-.-,. G1-, I�lI1z�F
Ir.
Dave %,V mer, architect representing Vemt£ire Develop.men't Group, developers of Lot
3, Block 6, V.UJages of .Br=an? Creek, presented the request for platting. Mr. Wymer
explained that there will. be no driveway entrances onto Bear Creek Parkway or parking
between thf; 'buildings and the street: because the project is designed to provide a
wooded greenbelt area of up to twerity-five feet (259 deep between the tau.il£linc`s and
:bear Creek Parkway. Ile stated that there will. be a perimeter fence with limited
access and a mpnned guard station, clu.) leasing facility and a iv2aterfif>af:£ He further
stated that there will be a total of 308 (knits within the, pr-oject.
,Mr. Wymer discussfd the variances requested as noted in Rod Tyler's letter of May 41,
1884, itern by it eri.
Page Seven - Planning & -Kofting Commission - May 15, 1984 1984-062
_--..................... !Q .....................
ICI`. : `t NO, I - Requesting a reduction in the number of parking, spaces front two spaces
JUD; Dc - stated per dW( C, Uflill to .1.751 spices - -�r dwelling unit. lklr. Wyme, -ted that the tvo
Parking space requiren-rent is k>xcessive for the project a.nd ztilso that they are trying to
cofn'.-'J'.v wfth the fo. tv percent (40,'!6) of open space required by the •illap-es of Bear
Creek ArehitecturaLl C'ojlt-ol Cominittee.
ITEM NO. 2 -- A varian4��e in the front yard requirement to allow a J"ive foot (5 ) high
...
..... ...
and wrouc-ht iron security fence one foot (P) inside the property line is requested.
I'TEM NO, 3 Request for the reduction of the mininiunt masonry requirement pet,
61111(1'iii'g'.....e...fe-v-ation from 80% masonry per elewatiot) to a minimum of 6596 r1la-sonry per
elevation. Mr. Wyn-je• stated that they are requesting a brick vari;aDce for aesthetic
reason,,, and alsp because of the design of the building. they cannot be constructed lo'dth
80% masonry per elevation.
Mr. Tyson inquired if they head a probleril with 80`-/'0 masonry on the front facade only.
Mr. Wynier stated that they would imt be able to do this because of the way the
buildings are, desigried. He -stated that they have put as much brick on the first floor
as possible,
Mr. Wymer addressed the letter from the Villages of Bear Creek Architectural Control
Committee stating that they are in sub'stantial comp- 14)nee wit-ft the Committee
requireaients, with the fi:)Ij'owinF exceptions,-
1. Fifty percent (509;.)) solid b?alcojy requirement. 1AIr. John llvlowris, Triland
Development, Inc., stated that the Architectural Control Committee granted
them a variance ota thi reguirernerr.t --stating that if tl-wre is a complaint
agalllSt clutter that they will then have to go bacil", and re'oufld the balconies
500
to comply with the � X, solid requirement. Ile stated that the balcorty is
Small Without much roo"ll for storage an is mainly a source of light.
2. They are installing a cedar fence on the western boundary and the
Architectuiral Committee is requiring that they brinf), Vile iron fence
around twenty-five feet (251) on that western buwndary awzay from the corner
so &,,, not to detract from or obstruct the view of the wooded area.
3. The use of mercury vapor wall niounted lights. The developer has agreed to
rernove the mercury vapor wall mounted lights and use the require-d
lights instead. This will. need to be reflected on tile, Site Plan,
4. Electric meter screening - -The developer stated that they will be complyiIng
" Is
with this requirement, but 1;rjw e Tiot received the transformer ar3il eleotPleal
meter locations from TP&L.
5a. I site & GATV Plans - The developer will comply.
I
5b. Landscape plans 'ti stated that they are still in the process of
developing, the Inndscape plans.
5e. Soils Report - Mr, Wy-ner stated that they Will SUbfflit the Soils Report 41
a letter from the structural engrineer, (terflfying that the foundations were,
desivned in accordance with the Soils BZeport.
Page Eight -- Pla€�r� ek Zorji:ig t;;<�rr missi;art 1'ay 15, 1984 1.184-063
....-- .
1•J.r°. McMillon stated his concern about granbrig a variaiace to the 80% r1nasonr;v across
the front facade, rrs Was rccluirud in the previotr.s pl'rt.
Mrs. Park stated that she was ;against the variance to the rnasonry requirement also.
Mr. Tyson stated. th.nt lie had a problem with reducing t: (-- dumber of parking spaces
and felt that the requirements should r£.rnaln a rninimurn of two parking spacers per unit
until the ordinrarnr£ itself is chanted.
Mr. Kni.ht e:pizai€recd that a parking study of p,wt.€ ent complexes within the Cite of
Euless .had been pref+€tred by Deshazo, Starek and Tang, Ile stated that the surve'v Was
conductedi in various apartment eonrple=xes at dUf rent times of the day r :1G i?t?.:leluded.
that 1.74 5 parking spaces per unit is adequate.
Ylr° zlctTi.11cara made a rtaotion to reccammerid approval, of the Site Develolrri"terit 1Ian and
Final Plat of Lot 3, B!o& 6, Villages of Bear Creek - -First Inst;:lhlient, as presented
subject to co€r r.lia€:ce With the tillwes of Bear Creek Architectural C oritr£ l Committee
lettt;r dated April 26., 1984, and Rod Tyler's letter date .'.lay 11, 1984.
Mr. Tyson secondea the motion, and the ,vote is as, follows:
:byes: Iviessrs. <•ejkli.l.lon, Tyson & Deithloff
Nays. Mrs. P'k.lrk
t.h airman Deithslr ff declared the motion carried,
CONSIDERATION OF SITE DEVELO.P��rllsN t' PL^�l� & PLATTING P-84--34 SITE
----------------------------- ---...............................-- ------
DE EOP�1IP;NT I'1.,.%'N � FINAL PLATTING-4 OF OT ;i. I'LOCK fit. VJl-.1�:<�GES Ol' f3€s:,��.
- v---� _ — .--- .
CREEK - FIRST .INST%�.LL.,;It�:l�T, LOCATED SOUTH AND ADJACENT TO ?BSI- LANE,
IArI;S AND ADJACENT TO BEAR CT >:RN I'>�li.KVVAY AND EAST OF }-1-011 k*il' >1-ISO
ROAD
Mr. Kennv Ilafne:r, Washington/1-lValleace, Inc., prese-nted they request for Final Platting,
of.Lot 3, Block 9, Villages of Be<-.r Creek- - First Installment. Ile &".Jdr•esse;d they items
in Rod Tale-.,r's letter date May 11, 1984, teo-ardino the variances requested item b
iter%a.
ITEJ,Ad NO. 1 - Fie st«.Aed Uhat tlley :arc= rec:crestint:, 1.75 park-ing spaces per unit .,<l"iic h they
have deemed to be adequate. V -
ITE;.I NO. 2 - The developer is requesting a minimum of 65%, fnasorirly per elevation
instcxacl of fire rec.uh-ed 80% masonry per elevation. t-lr. Ilafr_e.r striated tl-ull.t while some
IDr.riiciin elevations may have as low as 6:5% nmasonry, thie overall tiverane masonry to
be provided threxrt li£1ut the project eras appro�iraiat£;1,, 74%,
elr. llafner sr.b riittc—m a letter from the ArehiteeturLal Contra" Corn.,- ittee of Vil.1_ages
of Bear Creek granting their approval, which was requested in Rod Tyler's letter dater'
M1,ay 1.1, 1988 Regarding the sc-ree'nirrg fence detail, Mr. Ilafrier• stated that they will
comply with ttrc� requi.rernerrt of putting the detrail ore the ronstruct:ion plan.
,Jr. 'I'yso.n stated that he thought tl?e project. Was too dense and needed more ripen
Page Nine - Planning & Zoning Commission - ?•lay; 1-5, 1984 1984--064
�j.% Knight explained that the developer was � ittdn. the density allowed by the zoning.
v�r. ls�zelillora .Wads �� motion to tec}c�rf�rf�i;ifzi �f.t31.�f.°oa«l of tl:e. Site Deve.lc�A>r.�s;r�t 1'!_t ri -
Final Plat. of Lot 3, Block 9. Villages of Bear Creek -- Fir;t as presented
subject to Rod Tyler's letter dated I-Ylay 11, 1.9.134, and with the additional resluirrnent to
the vnriance requesting za minimum of 659 masonry per elevation, that the nver:.lge
masonry requirement for the overall project be 44,,S,
Mr. Tyson seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows:
Ayes, Messrs. McMillon, Tyson & Deithloff
Nays- Park
Chairman Deithloff declared the action carried.
V UL
CONSIDEli. Pl..Arl".T`ING - P-84-35 - RT PI.ATl'fNG OF TIl%ACT jP, l• ES''P.11,K
.............................
'lt?:i, l: 'I.'r� 1.0 'S 2AR & BR, T .T.,,S'l'fs:�.l K CENTRAL�L ADDI'l'ION,
L0(.,,A t'ED l,,?AST A D ADJACEN.T......fO lre'.T's4`IPA K WAY AND SOU fl �NI �DJ�-
,Mr. Janies Kniv,ht stated that the petitioner was. unable to attend the rieetin tonight,
He stated that the plat is in con;p .ante with City ordinances.. and because the property
bras beer, zoned C;-2 for over five years, no puiblic hearing is regUired.
Mrs. Park rnadf: a motion to reec>fnrnef�s� approval of :tae a�ep)<�tting �+f ?I�, 1'�sstparl
Ct ntir.l. dzirtion, .into Lots '2.A-R & 2Bli, 11iest ari Central Addition, as presented.
Mr, Tyson seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows:
Av s: Mrs. Park Deithloff, i•.1cMillon 6, Tysan.
Nays- None
Chairman Deithdoff declared tare motion carried.
Ix.
CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOP,Alr ;T --POLICY CONSIDERATION ;u ARIOtiS
---------------- —-
IOPIVIll T POLICIES TO BE ADOPTED 7'0 LLEtATE FUTURE" C O V;� I �N"I'
AND C; STS TII:.-71. T..I-11, f.`ITY IS CURRENTLY EXtil'.l�li-Tl�.N" ;�Cr Oly ANTICIPATING
This item. was to-DIled ifritil the r:ie eting of June 5, 1984.
X.
,zdISCELL NEODS
Mr. Knight 'SU—'d tl►rzt representatives fr•on the Triland Development Corpor°atiof,
would like to explain to the Gonimission the regmirements of the Villages o," Bear Creek
tlrehitectirr,il Control Committee.
_` .on ing Corm-nission 1984 i9 8.4-615
Mr. Peter Stae';ks, Manag-,'*.nI- Partfiev with Terra/Triland, passed out copies cli their
g d - -j desigi,,, signs a-V-.1 graphics, F-ind laxidscaping, and' briefly
uir-efines which govem
explained each-
X1.
ADJOURNMENT
...........
There being rm f urtber 1)1 is i n v,s to conduct, the ineeting adjourned at 10:15 p fn.
IVIIrman Deithloff