HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-06-05 1984-66
AGENDA
Planning S: Zoning Commission
201 N. Ector Drive
Euless, '1.'exas
June 5, 1984
7:00 [:mn. - Pre--Ci i-m-nission Merating to Discuss Agenda itf;fms
,.`ltl Pm. - Cal.l. to Order for Commission.. Co,nsit.Jeration of Scheduled lterns
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES -. Regular 1Y'leeting Dated May la, :334
OLD BUSINESS
I. C.`ONSllri:;RA`1ION OF DEVELOPMENT 1'(J1.IC
Consideration of various det%e.lopment pol.icie:, to bc� adopted to alleviate
future complaints and costs that the City is currently expo '.10.13CJiT or
anticipating,
NEW' BUSINESS
1, CONSIDER NSl:f. ER P.1.ATTING. P-84-36
Connbii ed Preliminary & Final Platting of Lot 1, Blocs` 1, Anderton AddHtion,
located south and adiac ent to SAL 10, west of Raider Drive, i.orth and
adjacent to South Pi �e.l Jae II.oacl, and adjacent to the southern bouriclar,a.
1.1. (,-;O.NSID.ER PLATTING. R-84-3 7
P.reliminaT'V Plating of Lott; l & 2, Black L. Glade Crossing Shopping Center,
located south and adjacent to Glade Road. west and adlaeerJt to North I'dain
Street, east and north of Northgale Addition.
Ill. CO S.11:lE-R. PLATTING: P-84-33
Finial PMU—iDg of .loot J, Block 1, Made Crossing Shopping Center, located
Mouth and adj ic-Int to G.fia.de, li.oad, west and adjacent to North Main Street.
and east and north of Northg€ite .Addition.
IV, i::'ONS1:DI:,R PI AT TING:G: P--84-38
Final. Platt.iJig of Lot 2. Block 9, Villages of I3ear Creel; Addition - First
last,?l.iri���i-it, loe.=cted east and adjaeent to Fulls--'r4iser Road, south and
adjacent° to As.h Lane.
1984-6
V. CONSIDERATION OF PLATTING: P--84-40
Corrected Plattino, of Lots IR ek uR, Block 1, Airport. Business Park Addition,
located east of South Airport Drive and north, southl and hest of South
Airport Circle.
VI. 11U.13LIC; HEARING
Zoning C&se #nil-Il - Request of James Fitzgerald for a c�1€€�€age of zoning on
---------------------_
' 'Tact- 211 arrci to portion of Traet 2B, P. Halford Survey, A-711, 3.5' ; ores
of land, from C."--2 to PD for Mini-Warehouses, located west and adjacoiit to
North Y1.31in Stree.''t, south and east of Nlidw ay Par'k, Addition and north of
Fuller Street.
V11. PUBLIC IIEAP.IIvf
Zonina Case a- �- Request of Westhaven Interests for a eh;a€rg o of zoning
cri7 Tracts 'M &. 2, T. A. Cash Survey. A--280 and Treat 5E, T. Jasper Survey,
�A-816, 8.0 acres of land, from E.-3 to C--1 &. C-2, loc€ited south of Airport
Freeway, south .and west of J. I. Case Addition, north of P,:rkwood Addition,
and (-"ast of Westpark Way,
'i111. PUBLIC HEARING
Zoning Cease 484-13 - Request of Inc., for a change of
zoning ore Tract 1, J. I-1, Havins Survey, A-685, 21.005 acres of land, `corn R-
I to C--2 3rrtl I-1, located at the southeast corner of Glade; Road and Cheer
Sparger Road, west of F.M. 157.
ZONING DISTRICT C"T ABBREVIATIONS
R-1 dingle Family i:)etached Dwelling District
RIA - Single Family Attached Dwelling District
R--2 'Two,-F an.ily 1.1€uel-li€rg Dist.rict.
R:--3 - Multi-Family Dwelling District, 12 Units to the Acre
R-4 rdulti-Family Dwelling District, 16 knit: to t1-►f, Acre
R--5 Multi--F:nr ily Dw(,-;fling District, -94 Units to the Acre
C;-1 Neiglaborhood Business District
C_u - Community Business District.
L-1 -.- t..irnite�.t Industrial District
1--1 - Light Industrial District
I-2 - Heavv Industrial District
CUD - Cornmun.ity Unit Development
1-1D llfimned Developrrrent
SP - spe'effle Use Permit
1984-4>8
Rec
n.
111an.niDg &. Z01141LY COMMiSSiOn
June 5, 1984
CALL TO ORDER
The; regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:30
p n. in 11-)e Council Charnbers of '–Euless City HA. by Chairinan John Deithloff.
Mf3EBS & STAFF PE.ESENT ',,,�,"IEMBERS ABST--'.NT
,00
John Deitbloff Carolyn Park
Jack Hill Robert MeMillon
Carl Tvson Sarn Cotten
John alnell
James Knight, City EnLijneer
Rod Tyler, Senior Planner
Beeky Null, Development Coordinator
VISITURS
Greg Kuelb Rudy M. Garcia
cif"o Eierflardezz Roger W`ilfiams
James K'iefer Sam Beaslev
-iest R. Franke
hill Deacon Ea r i %
Rov Grishai n Kay Tyler
Jeanette Grishan,, J i m2 Fitzgerald
Dan Uzzle Muev Mall
Willie Mae :.,Vlccornlic
INVOCATION
The n.vocation was viven by Mr. John L,
ynef,.
APPROVA.I., OF MINUTES
The, minutes of the, regular i-neeting dated May 15, 1,984, were approved as written.
OLD BUSINNES:
L
CONSII)ERIATION OF DEVELOPMENT POLICY CONSIDEfItATION OF VARIOUS
..........................
–0 BE AJ.)OPTED TO ALLEVIATE FUTURE CO M 11 LAIN'IS
DEVE MENTT—OU MS...:T ...........
E 'E,L()P,
.............. ..........................
AND COS'I'S TI-I.AT T.HJ11 CITY IS CURRENTLY EXPERIENCING OR ANTICIPATING
............ ...................... .......
r. Rod 'Pdler, Sc-,niup Planner, stated that staff has prepared dov�,I.opiyjent policif-,,s as
fol`nws::
Wage e
` ' o Planning 6 'owing Cof imission Meeting June 5, 1984 1984°80
L Handicapped parking, if offered by the developer, be signed in accordance
with state law.
Entrances of all multi developments be t.ighted.
3. S.i-row surrounding curb cuts in conjUnction with final plats.
Ylr. 1-tr11 €"]ade mi- odor to ieeorlli7li=;t-ld r3.ppr:51+"al of the C<`evelilpn-lent policies according
to .Pod Tylerls f':"remo dated April 30, 1984.
t:y.nch seconded the r'not.ion, and the, vote is 8's follows,
Ayes: Messrs. hill, Lynch. Tyson & Deithloff
Nays: Axone
Chaimnan Deithloff declared the notion carried.
NEW .BUSINESS
1.
CONSIDER PLA I".i1Il' G: P-84-36 - COMBINED PR I::L YIINAR 3: FINAL PLATTING, O
:�. I)A;IsATC:i4 ADDITION, LOCATED SOUTH AND ADJACEs�T TO S.11.
10, WEST OF RAIDER DRIVE, ND11.1`H ADD
R-y y�--
1SOU.- '4FD q AR
.-r�. Greg Kuelk 361:3 Rickey Court, �aatauga, presented the: request f-or° platti,}g.
�1r. Lynch nrade a motion. to recornmend approval of the Combined Preliminary final.
Platting of Lot 1, Block i, Anderton Addition, is sribinitted.
Y r Hill seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows:
:'dyes: Messrs. Lynch, Hill, Tyson & Deithloff
Nays. bone
Chaimman Deithloff declared the r:aotkm carried.
11.
CONSIDER PLATTING: P-84. 3 -- PRE"J;t1U]NARY PLAT'T11�G Or LOTS 1 2, BLOCK
ata, t�J Cff.0S51NG SHOPPING CENTER, LOCATED SOU'- If
(MADE ROAD, WEST AND Al:)>).V,"P; `1' `b 4 6R.'' 'J-I : '�'-J'Ki'J:;`.l-', 'I A1ST A.R-D.
Lir. Saar f:;t'asley, 485 Belt Line Road, Dallas, presented the. request for platting.
Page Three - Plararling 3 Zoning Cora mission
'ir. Platt made a jy'o ion to L'ecolYz1':iejli� ��3�sr'L?i r3.l of t�3i=. Pi'f.�.?rilid3�3.r'y P�-a€�.Jrtu tii .:t?�..� .�
t1 2, Block 1, Glade C:roissing Shopping Center, as submitted.
A--Er. Lynch secor;ded the motion, and the vote is as follows:
dyes. Messrs. Hill, Lynch, 'I'yswn & Dei'Ihloff
Nays: Norte
Chrririnarl Deithlof f declared the, motion carried.
Ill.
CONSIDER PLA'I"t'lNG. P-84--`8 - FINAL PLATTING OF LOT 1, KIOCK L, GLADE
UkOSSl&i lli�l' I �i `.EI�TTLTi, LOCATED SO T 11 AND Al-J<`;?1cENT TO €j.,Al-JE
ROAD, i4 EST AND ADJACENT TO�tiC�I2'I'lI ,`11��1A� uTell f`I', AND EAST AND `�d.�RT.H
'A ---- ------------------------- ---------------------------------__.__--------------------------------------------------------------------------.....--------------------- ------
Mt% Siam Bea ley, ;°485 Belt. drie .iboad, Dallas, presented the request for platting,
dl~'. `I'vson matte a motion to r'ecom.mend approval of the Final Platting of Lut B o
1, Glade Crossing Slopping Center, as submitted.
Mr. Lynch seconded the motion, and the vote: is as follows:
-ass: °IysL?xr, T.}yircYa, hill T:leitl-rlt)fl`
Nays: gone
Chairman Deithlof€' declared the motion carried.
I .
CONSIDER^IIAlTING: FINAL 1I4l lING OF 1,01' j, BLOCK 9, VILLAGES
U.P _ T-?l P.
(..Rl.'EK DI)ITION FIRST INSTALLMENT, LOCATED EAST AND
ADJACENT TO FULLER-WISER GOAD, SOUTH AND— "�I3J CENT TO SH L i� ___
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------..................................................................................... ------.................-----------------
MTl l;a,.cl�� Cfar•ci._a, t�?er 4yL?iai;.at.cs, I L?.rt G'or't'h, presented the request for ?.lrat.t.irlg,
It; response to a Cauestion ?y J�Ir. Tyson regarding drive entrance locations, Mr. Marcia
St.S.Ci?<1 t.�actt :ller'i' Slvi?.1iC: be one drive entrance oft of Ash Lane aild two off of Fuller-
,
Road.
Mr. Lvnch made a rnotion to recornmenl approval of the 1`inal Putting of Lot ?, Bloek
0 �nitted.Cs < r lll
Mr. 11iil- seconded the rnotiorl, rand the vote, is as follows:
Page Vora - Plem-ning_& Zoning Commission leetinc - June 3, 1984 1984-7 I
:fives: Messrs. Lynch, Full, Tyson u Deithloff
Nays. None
Chairman Deithloff declared the r:otion c�arrjed.
V.
CONSIDER PLATTING: P--8:1...48 -- L,"(-)Pa.R.EC'1;^D .l LA1"T`.l.l G OF 1.O'I'S J_R eK '2R,
_l. .l.l .l='U_ff_T7 lai7STN1 SS 1-'A.11.K ;",DI)i'l'TQN, LOCATED l?ASrF OF SQt)TI-1
'M P0.11.T T)RIVE AND NORTH, SOUTH AND W-ST OF SQUTH AIRPO T CIRCLE
`I'llGere. breint, no one in fln e audience .r£'-I?R'es ntinE� this request, r,'l James Knig."It; City
1'"n irw1 L'r`, stated that the purpose of this plat is to correct the location of a. building
line, industriai .coning allows t twenty foot (20') buiidin1c, line; however, tine original
pi.:£t ,,;as platted with a twent y-five foot (259 I?:ji.ldi€?g l.i.ne, The petitioner is proposing
to b ild a. slightly inner tyudlaing on the- lot which necessitates the change.
NIT. H.i.I:J. made ;� -?.tt.iz?n to reo-<>r?ri?end f I?proval of the, Corrected Platting of Lots 11',
,. 21t, Block L Airport Bi:siness Park Addition, as submitted.
ur. Tyson seconded the motion, and the Mote is as folloxLs-
Mess
t�ves: rs, Hill, Tyson, Lynch & Deithloff
Nays: None
Chair-man Deithloff de{Tared the motion carried.
VI.
PUBLIC; TTE:'§1iING - ZONING CASE :x}84-11 - REQUEST FOR A CHANGE OF ZONING
QN '
'RAC 2131 AND L-3 PORTION
.......). .l'. TT:�.1.:.1'Q.11.1:) `�.):I�'.ti'1;3'', .t�. s J.i s
30 ? AC;:1dT S UP L<1N51 11_(! C--2 TO PD FOR LOCATE D
AND ADJ_CEN`i ` 6 11Q `l,l1 �l,�.11ti �'.l'.Yl..l:'1', St�[;`I'IA .��I�.� 1.,� �1 6"F :L'111.)F'4'AY - Ahk
ADD1TTQl AM.") NORTH QP FULLER. S'1 '1.
Chai-man Deithloff opined the public hearing and explained that the proponents ;'nor€id
be beard first and then the, r- pporir:nts.
'1r. Jina Fitz,4rald, 590 Si ngleton Road, Liidlothian, Texas, owner of the property,
presented the request for refoninge. He stated that 'the P&Z l:ad previously approve
:? yap;r'ln.ent project oft this loc=ation but the City Council derided that this- mig"lrt ~lot
1}e the best t€5e of tl.i tj^oft; rty< Qre: of their concerns was the additional traffic. on
{lain Street. He submitted a plait for €ni.rli.-war'el•oases that he believes Vould
the ,c>l,rov�;.l. of rrtost of tl?eft objeetiot�s, lie presented eaCh MCJn-ber of tip;
Commission with a copy of a letter he sent to surrounding property Owners a;ad st<-te.,
th"aIt. he had recei eA favorable responses ?rom most of the surrounding property-
owners, A ten-foot brick- wall cons"ruc'ted arOWI(j the perimeter of the rlZini-
warc;i-rc,USe project wtis proposed. Alr. Fitzgerald stilted that the ffences.fences. of the
residential proper# owners Would be moved Wick to the brick ttr?.l.l, Rt his cost, to
it-lelUde the easement within the homeowner's property.
Chmirman Deithloff entertained questions.
Papf5 FiveM- Planniii�f " ��€ri€�� t�f3€r missio �'3t�t�tir;�u!,Ie 5 -1984 984-9
Mr. Tyson inquired why Mr. Fitzgerald did not include: the fence across the dmaimage'
casement.
"VIr. Fitzgerald stated that there would be a brick mall aer.°oss that opening In wbich
thei- would leave an open.i€?g to take e are of any flood conditions that mic-ht anise.
Chairman Deithloff and Mr. I'yson inquired about the type of' brick thrt would fie used.
Nlr. Fitzgerald stated that to ,ju-nibo face brick would- be used.
Mr. Tvson it ulred about th- 7.5 easement on the stir€th side. €-1f; was concerned with
the maintenance of the property (mowing, etc.).
ti-ir, l itzgf:r°alts said he would do one of two things; either get an ra.green-sent with N'Ir.
;off, or pate the area.
Chairman Deithlof`f was concerned with lights being above, the ter.--foot level.
:ir. Fitzgerald stated all lighting would be below the roof line and attfaehed to tilt=;
buildim s.
€hairrnan Deithloff asked for any other- proporients. Since, there were none, he asked
for any opponents. There. wele, no opponents.
Mr. Lvnch was ccric=er.ned €,.hors€ !rjgross/eg€ess, fire hires within the project, and the
fact there was a lone build n.- with only four parking smaces provided.
Mr. Fitxgerald responded that the ;:ire Marshall was in agreement writh this
prefinufiary Concept.
Chairman Deithloff reaminded Mr. Fit:-;gerald ;hat lie was applying for a PD, which
na+�zans that if the Conlmiss.kon r if?roves this project, it :must stay ;as is unless you
contact the l?&Z.
a'lr. Lynch, trate�i that lat; could not support 'the arc?�3u�;<a,. iiril.F�ss. tiaea°c? �vc�rr provisions
for more pa rking
VIt% Knight stza;r-,fl that the .Fire Marshall had reviewed the plans and felt that the .fire
flea€°tnie.rit h id adequate access to provide fife protection.
;'lr°. `I y 4cm also slip?-,red concern regarding the size of the units in the proiect and the
parking available.
Chairmi--iri. Deithloff (asked how rmany units would be in the middle '>uilding.
Ddr. Fitzgerald said the raai€airnum size would be. about 250 squa e feet.
Chairman Deithloff reiterated the, concern of access to the property.
l -tre RiPlnnninu° & zonin Com ission metin 194 X98 -<, � a
Mr. Fitzgerald asked ibe. P&Z Commission to table his request so that hie could
address the issues.
Mr. Tyson wanted to 'see n ove, detail (nuriil r of knits, more parking, fire lanes, etc.)
placed on the development plan.
Mr. Lynch cormnented on ttt.(, aesthetie considerations (decorative ten--toot wall...
par irlgr• layout, and He was also concerned; with the reasoning; behind
the metal panel gates shown on the site plan.
Nlr, Fitzf;er€old stated he was planning to use corntraterci€il �;m°ct.de; overiiead, rnetma.l doors
fc)r sec�r�rityy tiie leaseholders K�'nuld rise €� r,a metic card to access the prei-ra.ises. lac?
one would be li✓-'Dg on the site.
i'dr. Llvnei-t was concerned with the possibility that the units could be used for
something undesirable sula as a
c� 'sand, body shop, etc.
Mr. Knight stated the restrictions were Outlined.
M-r. Fitzgerald stated that the ir.Ses Wou.ld be .included it' the lease: (no business i'voul.d
be operated from the property).
1 . Lynch asked Mr. Fitzgerald if he -md any problem with this being put on the plan.
Mr. Fitzgerald said he would, have no problem. with it and would address tli;-it. is L' as
w el.l a, t.fie -)the that were �iienti.oned.
Chairman D(,itt?.loff asked if the metal panel gates would open next to K.-Bob`:.
.r. l�'i.tzvera.ld stated that fie was tho owner of that property also. The in�j�e�sf£:Tress
through `fiat gate, mas for the f3f;i"t.e'fit. 0. the five d£'partrylent..
ktr. '-i'yson r'ernarked that he would like to see more details regarding the Tate
(construction, unite lr.niits for access to tile facilities).
tlr. Lynch made a niotiori to t,abite the Development Plran. for Zoning Case #84-11. until
the next p&Z meeting to be held on Jtme 1.9, 19$4.
Chairman i')eithloff advised that the .t'ubl.ie Hearing w,-.;.s still open and this case would
w. tl"e firs t One on the- agenda it that meeting.
Mr. Hill seconded the motion. and the Dote is as follows:
Ayes. Alessrs. Deithloff, Hill, Tyson & Lynch
Nays: None
Chairman Dei.thlo.ff declared the motion carried.
Page Seven - Planning kt Zoning CdSri�ri�i�sio.r�. Nfeetirrg - June 5, 1.1984 1084_74
til:L.
PUBLIC HEARING w C1l�,ING CASE � 84 -12 �- REQUEST O V ESTI-IAt=I!N lN'1'l.Iil:,�;`l`�S
................_............................................._..._.._.__._. ._.
FOR _� CHANGE OF ZONING ON 'i'l�E UI'S 713 k 2 T. A. CASH Sl:R EY', A- 380,
`l'. Y. PER &URVE , A-81.6, 8.0 ACRES OF LAND, FR01-,,VI R-3) TO
U_ -,N C,_2. T:OC;A0`ED SOUTH OF AIRPORT FREEWAY, SO'-U—I'I-I A-'^"' -3'.E ST �L3i' J, I.
CASE' ADDITION, AND E,�u`.l` ClI' t4'1;�iI`r�.1l .I� ttfEt.�'.
C;'Iu ii,fnan Deithloff stated that they rules on this public hica ing were the game as the
previous one.
11r. Huey? Ball, HaeyT H. K-1,11 A Assoeiates, Inc., Al-Lied Bank of Bedford, prese-r ted the,
request f•or rezoning. llis request in(!fi dies C-2 oil the. northern portion} and C-1.
adiacr:nt to the single--fam-}ilyT developme-lit to the south. Ile stated that t)�n
surrounding" properties were zoned C-1 ik C-2. The area immedinte.ly to the south
of the property is a. single-family deveiopi-rent. There are, already two Pieces of
property that are office buildings, one piece of property that is a motel, Al's Fo.rinal
w e,ar, and tl:e Case Equipinefdt Company adjacent to property for which rezoning is
iiel.[lL" rL'Lltrd=3tC;d, IIL` referred to Gorl-- g Case`. X425, w iC`h he had brought before the
co'n-Inlission previously=. He mentioned at that ti.rrje that this was part of :a master
development thai Ile would be bringing back before the PAZ Commission for pl.vtting
and replatting of properties. He displayed a diagram the property; in IC#1425
in relation to the subject prope'rtyT.
fir. 'l'itson Wanted
to knoo �= if the street proposed in the diagram will be public or
private.
'Ur. Ball stated tl at it will be a dedicated right-of-way.
�"'fr. `1vson asked if it is frjeant to be accepted as a city street at some time in the
f}:cure.
�Ir, ball stated that it wou d—, it beinsf• a part ofLC41425 and the Planned Development
approved at that tin-,e. lie referred to the street in relation to the property lines rind
boundaries in their overall pl,.in. l-fe also stated thhat the developers mentioned is
:LC#425 have con mitted to a fence along the right-of-way for 1.070 feet. vlr. Ball.
requested that the developer extend the fence line: along the single-fa;ylily area in
Wilshire Addition to the south. He then read and distributed copies of the letter frog-m
the developer stating that he would comply. Mr. Ball stated the remainder of tl-101
fence which would back up to 11arki oodl Addition would be guilt to :match the existing
fence to the vest.
,vlr.. L nch incuired about the southern boundary of Tract 1-1 ::?-rjd the .jot;' in 'tie fenc,d
lure.
Nlr. Ball stated thAt the fence would be r.-ompleted as in ZC4-425 to tl,rA point. Pro?a,
there on to the, west, it ;would be, built in accordance with City ordinances and irr.
accordance Ya=ith that alread v established in that farear
1r. T'yfson wias concerned with the ingress;e�tress of the northern right-of-way befit-I
a. city str e(-A,
P eµ .1th Planning & Zoning Conmission Mc--tin- - �u��e 5: 1984 �.984 <5
... ---------------------------------------------
AW. Ball stated that it '�.�o�i�V U£ i� Ca��4 Jt�'�G'E'�>
Mr. Tyson remarked that fie recalled that it would lbe a pf.'3i%ate drive due to As w,,(Itl,.
Mr. Ball stated that that was true at the time ZC:i`425 was first brought before the
Commission. after repeated work sessions :x.ith the ho.rneowners, etc., it was
approved as ea dedicated right--of--way.
Mr. knight stilted Unat that was correct.
Nlr. Tyson recollected that the right-o --wzny was to scale the property owners on the
south-
Mr. linkht stated there would be some private drives and fire lanes that. would c at s?
t-ie buildings.
Mi. Tyson questioned having an ingress/egress off, Westpark Way and the freeway that
would serve this area.
Mr. Ball explained the ingress/egress of this property.
Mr. Hill pointed out that with this ingress/egress frond the freeway, all the traffic
would not have to Ilse W'estt ark Way.
l'ysoi� was, t�oric}c>.iric cl witl-i pro-v, —. tei-�:zrits iri the C-1 area because it bordered
d
on the residential area,
Mr. Ball com—fiented that it Would be ra more diesirable neighbor than the present
zoning of R-3 multi- farnily.
tlr. Tyson cornrnenled t?3€it: traditioi►i►.l. zoi�in Would Put re.sidenee to residences ratl��;r
thin cofnnflr rc;.ial to single-family residence.
Nlr Ball stated thal it had C--2 to the west st €gin north and PD to the e&st, which would
allow C-2. �
Chairman Deithlofr. asked if there were any additf(Drdcr.l pi'o at?i erktS or opponents; .disc',
there trwerC none". he tasked for any other =eornments or questions by the Conic:ission
members.
lr. Lynch asked it ltiesthaz.en Interests is the record owner of both the property in
ZCri425 and this property.
Mr. Ball Mated that the record owner of property in ZC+'�'425 is Windfall Investment
('or' w-w of 'their ;corporatioras) and i<v'ras the same 0,011 ner of the property in this coning.
request. At that time, Westhaven and Wi.dfia.l:l were ,joint developer,-; but. are now
sept-,rats} o wrrer'"w.'o
Page 1, 0-It - P.lanning-fix Zoning Con, ission Meeting June 5, 19$4 1984--75
IIr. Ball stated that it would be a city street,
Mr. Tyson remarked that he recalled that it would be a private drive due to its width.
Mr. Ball stated that that. was true at the time ZCT 42 r was first brought before the
Commission. .liter repeated work sessions with the homeowners, etc., it was
approved as a dedicated right-of-way.
Mr. Knight stated that that was correct.
Mr. "I"yson recollected that the _right-of-way was to serve the pr•orx-,rty owners on tine
south.
Mr. knight stated there would be some private drives and fire lanes that would circle
the buildings.
Asir. Tyson gUestioned having ran ingress egress off Westprark Uay and the freeway that
would serve this area.
Mr. Pall explained the ingf.*ess/eg.ress of this property.
Mr. 1-fill pointed out that with this ingress/egress from the freeway, all the traffic
would not have to use Westpark tray.
Mr. Tyson was concerned with probable tenants in the C-1 area because it bordered
oil tine residential area.
Mr. Ball corm rented that it would be ra. more desirable neighbor than the present
zoning of K multi-family.
Mr, Tyson commented that traditional zoning; would pint residence, to residence rather
than connmereial to single.-family residence,
",lr. Ball. stated that it had C-2 to the west and :north and C-2 and P.l-3 to the east,
which would allow C--2.
Chairman Deithlofl- asked if there were any additional proponents or opponents; since
there were none, he asked for any other comments or questions. by the Commission
members.
Mr. Lynch asked if Westbaven Interests is the record owner of both the property in
ZC4425 and this property.
Mr. Ball stated that the record owner of property in ZC#425 is Windfall Investment
for one of their corporations) and was originally the owner of the property in this
zoning re quest Until Purchased by Westhaven Interests in February, 1984. At that
Unie, Westhaven and Witnd"al.l were joint developers; but arc:, now separate owners.
Page Nine - Planning & Zoning Con-ifnission Aleeting, - June 5, 1984 1,99 8 4-7,6
............................
e ;x- -e,, -iis concern that the extension of the f n ouild
Nlr� LN.1 -b f- pt �sed I e Ce w riot be
enforceable under C-T zoning and would not be enforceable as a contra(*t because it
is not supporte'd by consideration, The person making it might or might not have a
current interest in the property. Ile is concerned that the representations that are
made, to the ComITUSISIOn ZTIJt�,Jht not by enforceable in regard to standard zoning
ch.issification. Ile reiterated the Position of the Corlirnission on this tract to ensure
the protection for the citizens in the surrOUndinff A st-raight-zoning
elassiffication would not protect them. Ile has no opposition to the coneept of the C-
I type use, but does oppose the, stmight-zoniing, classification. Ile would like to see
a Planned Develorp-,nent as in ZC#425.
Mr. Ball stated that he �kmuld take, the idea back to the owner, but feels that the
owner would bt-lild 1-nult-i-farnfly as it is clirvently Zorled.
Mr. Tyson reniarked that the density of the R-3 zoning would not be as great as tbe,
other areas; it would provide a decent buffer for the property owners hi the area. He
agreed that the straight-zoning would not protect the citizens that live there.
Mr. Ball stated that approxi-mately one-half of the area is zoned C-2 alread-,y.
Mr. Tyson ?,iould like to see t1he same fence as proposed in the Planned Df.,vellopment
continued along the property in cquestion to protect the residential. property owners.
He wants to so'c' some seeTf,gatiOD b,1AW,0-f-,n the residential and the com-mercial areas.
Mr. Tlill. wanted to see some way to protect the property owners in the area.
Chair.-nan Deithloff asked if the construction plans were far enough or, the way to use
the property as a PD.
,-Jr, Ball stated that there were no construction. plaIns on building—only on streets and
Nlr, Lynch wanted to lanow if there i�,ere any members of the audience whose property
backed tip to the property in question,
r[Tiree m four homeowners in the audience -raised their hands.
Mr. Tyson bt:,,lieves the property is best suit,--.,d for use, but wants
alssllf.,iJTICTS C11TA protection for the residences in the area. Ile asked if an-v residents
in the audience would pref(-.,r the R-3 Multi-Famfly zoning.
Mr. Roy Grisham, 1916 Kynette,, stated that he would prefer commercial development
as opposed to apartment or multi-family arrangement with limits on building heigl-.1ts,
lighting! etc.
A-mr. Rod T vler, 2002 Kyn(-Ate .. wanted the of a I'D with certain buffers to
protect the 'horneo"evners frorl-I multi—story office buildings. He -felt it make
little difference to him whether it be C-1 or 13.-3.
Page Teri - Planning & Zoning Corn rnission NleetinU .r June 5, 1934 1984-7
Cb irmLan De.ithloff stated there are the. same height rest riet,ions of 35 feet in both
C-1 1 and R-3.
lrf Tyson felt the concern was not the height of the bu lding, but how much of the
buildings would be visible from the backyards of the homeowners. lie; also felt that
the tract would develop ass, cor:?rnercaial. lie is opposed to the C-1. blanket zoning and
wouil, prefer to see: C--€ as a Planned Development.
In #.iglu of the recent history of ZC 425, Mr. Lynch 1"elt this owner should have
fori:seen these concerns. Ife, concurred with Mr. Tyson ire. wanting to see proteetion
for the citizens in this area.
Chairman Deithlofl closed the public hearing and entertained is motion,
Mr.. Tyson wanted to I.rfaow if the developer would consider solne kind of PD
Mr. Ball stated that he would discuss this issue with the developer—he. could riot make
€a decision. tonight. lie. also stated that he had. made the fence offer in good .faith and
did not intend to of'f'end the Corm-fission.
Mr. Tyson asked Mr.. Ball if he wanted they case tabled or what his desire, rnight be.
'Vii, Ball stated that he wouId 1i',e the case to })e tabled and would discuss the m.-titter
with the developer.
kl Lyncia stated that his previous cofnments were based on ghat had transpired this
e�'e f:Ing, and (1t?t. the application f i. £?x .
If, response to Mlr. J'y%son's, inquiry as to hope' this, case would be handilled, if tabled so
the developer can go PD, Mr. Knight re.narked that this matter should come. :Sack
as a separate zoning case under Planned Development so that the property= owner; can
re;n tified and, staff can review the plans
NI r. Ty-son asked .i.f' tl�e PD C-1 ;was �a le :sser zor�riDg tl:fa.3 tfie (;-t ial.�r.ril:ot: :!oriirig for
which the developer is asking.
rr. l n.ig#?t: state£.t tPral it could be more restrictive; but it is an entirely different fora-i
of zoning. if the developer were going to a lower classification than the C--1 he could
request that. There is, no way of knowing if the I'D request is less intensive until it
has been reviewed. [-le further stated that site plans are required to aesul"bmfitte d a
ririnirnrfm of ?l, days in advance. `#'ire: case would not be able to come back in two
weeks in any event.
After eont.in fed disf,irss:ion reg€:.r'dl r)g the disposition. of this coning case, Mr. Knight
stated lie could fret the C.`ity Attorney to determine If PD zoning is {3 Less intensive;
use without having the benefit of knowing what specifically would be included in. the
deftellop III ent. Plan, In the p,,ast, flin ' petitioner has beer;. -a.t.towed to relmiest a less
infi.-milive use, which normally would be from C;-1 to m tilt i--family,. for which it is
c'.rirrently i/..£}ned, £}" on(:,.. of the single-f arnd y% :,`cfth`gorre'.s. A. rnore intensive use would
I
e C;-2. industrial, PE) or CUD type zoning.
m.r. J,Yson. made :a Ynot.ion to table Zoning Base l#84-12 until the first meeting in
July so the developer could come back with a less interisive PD request.
P .E.'.J. yeti ....Planning & Zoning Cominission -Mleeting June 5, 1984 1984-78
......... ... .................................................................-
,Mr. Lynch. seconded the rnotion; the vote- is as . t ,w
;es:
ess— Hill, Ly I so rwh, Tyson & Deithloff
Nays, None
Chaim u: Deithloff declared the motion carried.
V111.
PU[3LIC HEARING - ZONING CASE 484-13 REQUEST OF WASHINGTON/
'E OF ZONING ON TRACT- 1, J. 11. HAVINS St/3- VEY,
-----F,-0**...R-------A-------C...I"I...A----N....(i-------------**---------------- ........ .......*-----------------------------------------------------------R............
......................
ti i3 .......---------------------—-------------------------------- —--------
5, 21.0W,-) ACRES OF LAND, FROM R-1 'AO C-2 AND 1-1, LOCATED AT THE
SOUT11EAST COR-NER OF GLADE ROAD AND
F.M. 157.
...........................
Chairman? Deithloff stated the, rules were tile salne as in the previous ease,
-Vfr. Bill Deaeon, 37 Rosebrier, Bedford, represented the Deacon family, owners of the-
property since 18198, He explained that the property was used. as an experi-mental
turkey farm in the 194f►s or '50s. The turkey business was sold in 1973, and the ranches
rise(, for, farm"ing, wef-°(' Phased into other uses. Tile building's in 'Eule-'s, col'strueted of
conerete for the poultry experiments, were leased four or five years ago for cabinet-
jllaking and hospit�ll t"quip.-ment refinishing. He -Stalled that Ile was requesting the
ifldWtrial zoning to allow these uses to continue Jin ordl-.er to comply with the City's
zoning reqwreinents. He discussed the zoning on the s-i-tirroundirig -properties. He
ated he bad rnet with City staff (Fire City �Managrzx) to discuss Droblemis
sti
and alternatives dealing with the, current businesses.
Chairman Deithloff efite •tained questions. fie asked if there were any proponents.
I
There. being norle, be then asked for oppoywntsc There were no opponents.
N-1r, Lynch questioned why the property was not considered to be a non-coriforming
Use.
Mr. Knight expialfed that the btlSirleSSeS going' OD there were of 8. relatively recent
nature -subseriuent to the. CUrreDt ZODing.
Mr. Hill felt that there should be another way without going, industrial.
Z-1
Mr. Tyson agrec-.A that this should be a con-mlercia! piece of property. Suggestion was
made that the developer submit a development plan for the. uses as they are right
now, Then the developer will have to reapply for a zoning change as the need arises
in the future.
�Vlr. Knight stated th.,;it the petitioner could request a PD =which would require a site
or developmel-It plan. that would list the uses and location, of those uses and whatever
conditions alight apply.
Mr. LYnoh inquired' as to any tirm,., lirnitations involved,
k1r. Knight stated the courts have determined that either the zoning for the property
priate. The property should Lie rezoned to whatever On
is appropriate or not approL e
appropriate use, is, and there is no way to say how long ti-at use will be approuriate.
x, to have the c,,.lse tabled so that a development
,Vir. Tyson remarked that fie would s �(?.k
Mari; with the uses listed, could be submitted.
Page Twelve - Planning 6, Zomint, Compnission Meetin- - June 5, 1484 11,184-79
?.........
....................
mr. Klnigrht suggested that the Commission could approve the C-2 as is and deny the
1-1, or the, petitionf, ould withdraiw tt -1, and it would then be treated as a
separate zoning issue.
Chairm,an Deithloff preflerred to table the case for 21 days and keep the 1-1 and C-
2 together,
Mr, Tyson and Mr. Lyneh were in agreement.
liVIr. Deacon agreed to supply a, request for the specific uses. He asked what Would
happen if the current businesses moved out.
Chairman Deithloff stated that he would have to corne, back ajid yefuest a zo-Unc,
change depending on the use of the property.
Mr. 'I'yson asked if three weeks would give staff adequate time to rev.-ew the plan.
r. Knight it would meet the submittal requirement.11c, reeommendf.-�d that the case
be, withdrawn within 24 hours of tonight's meeting. The developer would UR-n-i receive
a refund of one-hzflf of his zoning application fee back and resubmit, his application.
Mr. Lyn eh suggested rernoving the 1-1 and leaving the stioight C-22 with the dev, :,toper
coming back for Pl) on the other piece.
N'T -iis
st and come back with a PD.
r. Deacon requested to withdraw I zoning reque
Chair-man. Deithloff decheired the pubbe hearing closed.
Ix.
ADJOURNMENT
The� ss to f.-onduct, the meeting adjourned at 9.25 p,m.
re being no further busine
............
f n an