Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-07-03 1984-92 AGENDA P arming Zoning Cc?.nimission 201 .iv. Ector Drive Euless, Texas July 3, 1984 6:45 p.m. - Pre Corrrrnissi.on yleet.ing to Discuss agenda Items 7:30 p.m. -- Call to Order for C{3mfnission Consideration of Scheduled Items INVOC A'I'JON APPROVAL OF Regular :Meetings Dated June -5 and 1.9, 1984 OLD BUSINESS 1. (::(-)N`i`lNt:€t3TION' OF P(JIB IC HEARING lonirt r- Giise #84-12 - Amie:nded request of b1 esthaven Interests for a change of zoning on Tracts 1B & 21 T. A. Cash Surrey, A-280, and Tract 5E, T. Jasper Survey, A--819, 5.06 acres of land, .from .R-3 to C-2, .located South o Airport f"rer way, north of Park )d �'�dditioit, and east of �restpzari, Way. NEW BUSINESS II. CO1VSII:?EI2. PLATTING Final Platting of' Lots 1, 2, & 3, Block 1, Harwood Crossing Shopping Center located at the southeast corner of North lain Street and Harwood Road. III. PUBLIC HEARING Bonin- Case 1'84 14 - Request of Finder--Care Learning Centers, Inc., for a change o' oriirx c?r3 I_,c?t.5 X r�c6 2, Block 1, Oak mood .Acres Estatets, 0.s 58 acres of land, fron, R--1 to Planned Development District for a dayeare facility located on the northeast corner of Ada.in Street Find .'ash .Lane. IV. PUBLIC HEARING Zoning, Case #84--16 - Request of Brooks Builders, Inc., for a change of zoning on Bloch 2, Lots 4-7; Bloel." -7, Lots 1-5, 8-11, 14-1.7; Block- 8, Lots 1, 2, 5-I2, 13--24; Block 9, Lots 3--11; Block 10, Lots 6 & 7; Block 11, lots 1-6, 9-44; Block 1.2, lots 2-7, 12-1.4; Block 1.3, Lots 14-1.9; Block 14, Lots I- 17: Block 15, Lots 1-9; Block 13, Lots 1 & 2; that part of Crowe Drive. between and adjacent to _of 2, Block 6 and Lot 1, Block 15; that t?«-t of Benbow Drive between and adjacent to Lot 9, Block 15 and Lot 1, Block 14, Bell Ranch Terrace, 21.68 acres of land, irony R-1. to Planned Developri-,ent for multi-felmily (conC on? iniums) and Commercial located west of F'V! 157, north of ;-Vest Euless Blvd., east of 1i'il hire Drive, and south of Airport Freeway. 1984--93 V. PUBLIC; HEARING Zoning Case #84-17 - Request of Harold L. C;opher and Weldon George for a change of zoning on 'Tracts IC: and ICI, E. Taylor Survey, A-1550, 7.192 acres of land:, from P-1, C-1, CUD/It-2 (Single-Family Attached) to C-2, located east and adjtacerat to North �jMain Street and south and adjacent to Glade Road. V1. PUBLIC H l A II I lei Cl Zoning Case #84-1.8 -- Request of Washington/Wallace, Inc., EngiTleers and Planners for to change of zoning on Tract I of the J. 11. Has iris Survey, A-- 685, 21.0.55 acres of land. from K-1 to C-2 and Planned .Development for cabinet manufacture and hospital uirniture and equipment renovation, located OD the southeast corner of Glade Road and Cheek Sparger Road, west of FM 157. VII. ELECTION OF OFFICERS ZONING DISTRICT ABBREV'I,A`FIi, NS R--1 - Single Family Detached DwelliTlg .DiStriet RlA - Single Family Attached Dwelling District R-2 - Two-Family Dwelling District ac Acre-3 Multi-1atTily Dwelling District, l to ti R-4 Mtil.ti-Fami.ly Dwelling District, 18 Units to the Acre R.-5 - Multi-Family Dwelling District, 24 Units to the Acre C-1 Neighborhood business District C-2 Community Business District L-1 w Limited Industrial District 1-1 Light. Industrial. District 1-2 Heavy Industrial District CUD - Community Unit Development PD - .Planned D? Velopment SP _ Specific Use Permit 1984-94 Regular Meeting Planning & Zoning Cornmi,ssioi July 3, 1984 CALL TO ORDER .......... The regular rne(-Aing of the Planning & Zoning Commission was cal-led to order at 4:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Euless City Hall by Chairman John Deithlotf. I,101' - STAFF PRESE�NT I IMBERS & MENIBERS ABSENT .... .................... ............. John Deithloff None Jack Hill Carl Tyson John Lynch Carolyn Park Robert MeMillon Larry Ingram James Knight, City Engineer Rod Tyler, Senior Planner Jifn M�cKanna, Project Engineer Becky Null., Development Coordinator VISITORS Willie Mae McCormiek Bill Blackburn Walter A. Elliott, Jr. Ben Brooks Warren Ilagan Glenna Owhip"s Pat & Ann Mixon Cathv Furbash Susie Bridges Pat I,,rafiignn Bill S— Shirley McLendon George McKinney Mr. & Mrs. Chuck Jordan Jim & Ann Sturges Bill Deacon Harold Copher Weldon George Mr. & Mrs. Tim Eckersley Huev Ball Mike McKenzie Denzel Goode Jesus Perez Naomi Svochak Debbie Newman -is Mike Owei John Park Fred & Molly Maddux Dale Lamb Teresa Cramer And Numerous Other Citizens INVOCATION' The invocation was given by Mr. Carl Tyson. Page Two - Planning & Ironing Commission - July 3, 1984 1984-95 APPROVAL OF MINUTES The n-inut.es of the regular meeting dated June 5, 1984, were approved, as amended, to read as follows: Page bight - Paragraph 13 ?�1r. I_la�.11 stated that it had C-2 to the wrest and north and C-2 and PD to the east, which would allow C-2. Pale fright - Last. Paragraph AMr. Ball stated that the record owner of property in ZC#425 is Windfall Investment (or one of their corporations) and was originally the owner of the property in this ,zoning request until purchased by "Iesthaven Iizterests in Febraa.ry, 1984. At that time, Westhaven and Windfall were joint developers; but area now separate owners. The approval of the rnimrtes from the regular meeting dated June 19, 1984, were approved as written. 01,D BUSINESS I. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING CASE #84--12 - AMENDED .............................- --- ...................... - ......... - REQ; EST CI, 14 ESTHAVEN INTERESTS FOR CHANGE OF ZONING ON TRACTS IB M, 1 . A. CASH SURVEY, A-280, AND TRACT' 5E, T. JASPER SURVEY, A-818, 5-06 ACRES OF I<Altii:i, Flit?Yi A-3 To C-2, L•UCArI'EI-5 1, )UTTI GF AIRPORT FREi,tt.t Y, (3f l°ARI�i'OOD AI:�T. I-TION, AND LAST OF I1'ESTPARK WAY Chairman .Deithloff reviewed the rules arid stated that this public hearing is still open. Mr. Huey Ball, Huey H. Ball & Associates, Bedford, read a letter, from Westhaven Interests requesting the Commission to consider the C-2 request only, and Westhaven, in turn, will make application wit-bin ninety days for PD on the southern portion. Mr. Tyson asked if 75% of the design documents completed were for the southern portion. YVIr. Ball started that the design docunnents completed were for streets and utilities only. There being no additional proponents or opponents, Chairman. Deit.hloff declared the public heaping closed. Mr. Tyson made a motion to recommend approval of the amended request of Zoning Case #84--12 with the understanding that Tract '`B" (southern portion of property) come back wth a zoning requst for PD subject to Westhaven Interests' letter dated July .1, 1984. Mr. Hill seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows- Ayes: Messrs. INson, dill, Ingram, Lynch, McMil.lon, Deithloff & Mrs. Park Nays: None Chairman Dei.thloff declared the motion carried. Page Three - Planning & Zoning Cornimission - July 3,.-.1.9.8.4. 1984-9€s NEW BUSING ll. CONSIDER PLATTING- P--84-41 - FINAL 1'i:,�`.l`TING OF LOTS 1, 2 & 3, BLOCK 1, --------------------------- --- ------....--------- FlARWOOD CROSSING SHOPPING CENTER. LOCATED AT THE SoYI'I'Fi.EAST CORNER ------------- ------ ------.........------------ . ------...------------ F .ltitllllll .4eAl'� STIEI;I. A."d:C) IIAkllbo©D RoAL) Mr. Mike McKenzie, .Powell & Powell. Engineers, presented the .request for platting and addressed LIr. Knight's letter dated June 28, 1984, as follows: ITEM #1 - The owner is in the process of obtaining trie off site utility easerrients. ITEM #2 - Mr. Knight stated that he was not specifying that an casement be put in; just pointing out staff's request. The advantage to the easement is that no structure could be constructed on it; the disadvantage is that any utility could use the easement. He further strated that it is a private system and will be the developer's responsibility for continuing rnaintcnarace. ITEM 11_1`3 T Owner is willing; to participate in one-half of the cost of necessary storm drainage improvements in Harwood Road. However, tie wants to work with Mr. Knight between now and the City Council hearing to decide what is an acceptable cost. Mr. Knight agreed to that request. -:Mrs. Park Made a inotion to recommend approval of the Final Plat & Engineering flans for Lots 1, 2 & 3, Block 1, Harwood Crossing Addition subject to .lames Knight's letter dated June 28, 1984. iklr. MeMillon seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes- Mrs. Park and Messrs. McMil.lon, Tyson, Ingram, Hill, Lynch & Deithloff Nays: None Chairman Deithloff declared the motion carried. III. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING CASE #84-14 - REQI✓-1�`.S`.l' f.?f� KINDER--CARE LEARNING CENTERS, INf:., FOII A t_�HANGi� (.,jl' ZONING ON LOTS 1 AND ?, BLOc 1, ------...... _ _ _ -- - -AKi�t'ooD- -ACRES ESTATES, 0.758 AC,ll,ES OF LAND, FHOi�I T3.-.l To PLANNED DE4"ELOP-MEN DDIS'1'RIC-.i' EC3.11 A DAYCARE FACILITY LOCATED ON THE NOR I'H- EA T CORNER OF MAIN STREET AND ASH .!-e'"SNE Chairman Deithloff opened the publics hearing and explained that the proponent-.s WOUld be heard first and then the opponents. 1:tr. Bill Blackburn, 2800 one Main Place;, representing Kinder-Care Learning Facilities, stated that Kinder-Care has been in business "or 15 years and has 900 daycare facilities. Each facility accommodates 132 children. He believes this property is a good location for a daycare and will fill. a deed for the residents in the area. Chairman Deithloff asked if there were any other proponents. Tl"rere being none., he asked if there were any opponents. Page Roar - Planning & Gorai.rrg Comm.ssion - July 3, 1984 1984-97 Naomi Svochak, 1603 N. plain; Jesus Perez, 1900 C.hittarn, and Denzel Good. 101 Ash Lane, each opposed the zoning request citing hetavy traffic at that intersection, school crossing is also located there, the daycare could pose a potential problern for the fire station, and tlae general feeling that a. daycare should go in a commercial area. In rebuttal, Mr. Blackburn stated lie believed the daycare to ite a. compatible use in the residential area.. Mr. Tyson asked fkdr. Blackburn if Kinder--Care currently owned the property. Mr. Blackburn stated that the property is tinder contract contingent upon zoning find platting approval. There being no further opponents, Chairman Deithloff closed the public* hearing. The majority of the Commission members agreed that this was not the best location for a dayerare due to the heavy traffic, school crossing, and the feeling the property should remain residential. Mr. Tyson made a motion to recommend denial. of Zoning Case #84-14. Mr. l-Till seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Messrs. Tyson, Hill, MeMillon, .Lynch, ingrain & Deithloff, an(' Mrs-. Park Nays: None Chairman Deithloff declared the motion carried, TV. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING CASE #84-I6 -- l . ....... °-- ....lE.Q1EST OF BROOKS S B�U_�.I�L�.D_� ERS, IN.- ..C......., ........_.__"- K .._.......... FOl`! _- _C,_IiA.N.GE OF_ZONING ON B LOC C_._ ......D.O- TS 4-7; BLOCK „ , LOTS !_5, 8-11, 14- ....................... ----...._ ................... BLOCK 8, LOTS 1, 13-24; BLOCK 9, JO'T'S . 3-11.; BLOCK 1€l, LOTS 6 & e"; BLOCK IL LOTS 1-6, 9-14; BLOCK 1.2, .laW18 . .-7, l2 14 BLOCK 13, LO .S .14-49; BLOC;I?, l41 LOTS 1-17; BLOCK 15, LOTS 1-9; BLOCK 16, LOTS 1. ex `�; �.TTAT PART OF CROC' - ..... .............•- - - ---------- DRIVE BETWEEN AND ADJACENT TO LOT 2, BLOCK 6 AND LOT 1, BLOC .15; - - -------------------------•--------- - - _- rI`.FTA.'1' r;A T OF BEN;BUW DRIVE B.l":'1'1NEEN AND ADJACENT TO LOT 9, BLOCK 15 D LOT .I, 1.31,6CIN l4, DOLT R<�I"CH-TERRACE, 24.68 ACl?,l�S 0'F LAND, FI ONI R- I TO 11LANNIE.D DEVELOPTt-I.i~;_Nt.' 'FOl; 1;11�LT1-FAI'lIL Y C'OI�DO'�1.TNI.tJ 4i.S� ,��II) C'OtylME'RCI AL LC.IC;A.YI?<D W EST OF F.Y 157. NORTH OF `4V ST Et;LESS BLVD., ------- --°._------------------------------------°____°----------_ - .......... FAS'I' C).F 1Kll,SI1IRE DRIVE, A.N.D SOUT'.H OF AIRPORT FREE1<'�AY Chairrn.an Deithloff opened the public hearing and explained that the proponents would tae Beard first and then the opponents. :fir. Ben: Brooks, 19€15 Central Drive, Bedford. stated he is the owner, developer, builder and manager of the project. fie gave fa brief history of the property; platted in 1953 prior to being aime.xc d into the City with no streets or improvements put in. He- explained that the property has been undeveloped due to the lack of public improvements and the fact there are about 200 individual owners in the subdivision. Ile presented his proposal which includes '297 multi-fan ily dwelling units in a townlionie/eorldo;r-lirait!;r-� configuration in vwhict:t 3 out of 4 units will have garages and units ranging in size from 934 . ware .feet to 1,249 square feet. There are two general purpose con nieresial buildings proposed. The density of the project is 13.57 du/,ac, riot including the streets. Page Five - Planning & Zoning Commission......July 3, 1984 1984-98 ....................... ........ ... ... M., Tyson stated his concern about the placement of windows in the units next to the looking down onto the single family. residences because of the condo units existing fie inquired as to the type of rear facade proposed, Mr. Brooks stated that the rear elevation would be approximately four feet below the grade of the existing houses. He intends to provide a six to eight foot screening fence. There will be only one window in the bedrooms. He stated that the windows could not be reproved because the building codes require at least one window in a bedroom. NI r. tVarren ffagan, Boyle Engineering, Gaston Avenue, Dallas, explained the type of storm drainage 1.1n.provement's proposed. lie also stated that the existing portions of Kynette, Signet & Toplea streets are 31 'feet b.b. Signet and Toplea ;-,Ire 41 feet b.b. w6re they stub-out from F_VI. 157. They plan to continue the 41 foot b.b. pave-ment. Chairman .Ds ithloff asked .;.f there were any additional proponents. Mr, '.."vIike Owens, Chairman of the Board of Trustees at Calvary Baptist Church, stated that they are committed to stay where they are and plan to expand their facilities. He stated they prefer that the property be a type of residential as opposed to commerei,,A or industrial. He stated that they had traded with Mr. Brooks four non- contiguous lots on Nita for a contiguous lot next to the church. Prior to doing so, he checked on M.P. Brooks` reputation)utation and quality of vvork and found both to be goc�X1, . He stated he was pleased with the inclusion of garages. There being no additional proponents, Chairninn Deithloff asked if there were any opponents. Ms. Debbie Newman, 1505 rl'oplea, represented the adjacent homeowner,, opposed to the zoning request. She presented a petition signed by those in opposition. She stated she had checked with MPF Research reg�jrding the sale of condos. She indicated that 0 they were not selling very well and felt that the proposed condos will eventually turn into apartments for rent. She asked Mr. Brooks abOL.'.t the SJ)Ot ZOninLl PrOoOSed, whether lie had financing secured for the project, and what- kind of research he had conducted. Mr. f3rooks stated that he had no control over land he does not own; therefore, those lots were left out of they request. fie stated he had no financial cornmitments bought at this time, because tbey are only good for a short period of time; however, tie would have no trouble getting the financing. lie further stated that he was aware of the MPF Research report and had done research for three years and believed this to be a viable project. M'r. John Park ,stated that he and Carolyn owned Lot 6, Block 6, Bell Ranch Terrace. Ile stated he was not concerned about the people in the condos looking down into their lots, but, rather, having to look at the condos. Lena Owens, 5015 Yorkshire; Fred _Nladdux, 1400 Yorkshire, Lavon Furtnan, 504 Wilshire; Blair Dufour, 507 Yorkshire; and Dale Lai-,;b, 809 Gregory, Bedford; stated their -e opposition to the pre s , condos and increased traffic and wanted the property to remain single fainily, Page Six Planning & Zoning Commission - July 3, 1984 1934-�� In rebuttal, Amr. Brooks stated that unless the area is never developed, there will be an increase in traffic no tnratter what type of zoning. lie stated the area will riot substantiate single family. Ile stated it would cost approximately $300,000 to develop the area be does riot own. After additional discussion between the petitioner and the homeowners regarding the giros and cons of this type of development, Chairman Deithloff asked the Commi&sion for their comments. 111r. Tyson stated that he would like to see this project work to Mr. Brook's benefit as well as the Irorraeowrrcrs`. lie preferred there to be single #aanii > t}etvaeesa the existing residences to the west and the condos. 'Mr. Lynch pointed out that the City has looked at nurr.erous options for development of this property. In order to develop it, there will have to be some innovative measures used. lie concurred with Mr. Tyson regarding a transitii-xi between the existing single family and the condos and wanted Mr. Brooks to loot: at single family attached or 0-lot .line housing a's a buffer. lie also believed there WOUld be to traffic probler even if the property= developed. as si.ng.le farrzil.y. 'rile remaining Commission members concurred. Mr. Lynch made a motion to table the public hearing for Zoning Case 981-46 until the July 17th meeting. Mr. Mclllillon seconded the notion; and the vote is as follows: Ayes: essrs. l.,yrictr, YleMiilon, Tyson; Ingram, Hill & Deithloff, and Mrs. Park N a vs: None Chairman Deithloff declared the motion carried. (The. Commission took a ten minute break at 9:58 p.m.) V. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING CASE 984--1.7 - REQUEST OF HAROLD L. COPHER AND �'�•ELDON GEORGE r. �J.l, r?, Cli.�;�€(s.l, CP....M ZING f3.1� TRACTS rC AND It.:l: E. - ---------- W - TAYI.,CIi�. St?.l :' : '; r�-1550, 7.193 ACRES OF LAND, FR.Clt•1 13 1, C-1., CU.1 /R-2 (SM-GLE-FAMILY ATTACHED) rJ O �,T��-----l�0CATED D�S.T-----AND ADJACENT TO NOR-T`.H i�'1AI.N S�I'I�I ET -AND SOUTH AND ADJACENT TO GLADE Il.i�.�l:) Mr. Walter Elliott, .Elliott &. Hughes Engineering, Euless, represented Mr. Harold Cop her and Mr. Weldon George, petitioners of this zoning request. Ile stated they are proposing a shopping center with one rain anchor tenant (supermarket) and approximately 30 smaller shops and possibly three; satellite buildings. Mr. Ingram asked what the development time frame is. 'Mr. ;rirot€ stated that it will be approximately 2 - 3 years before it is fully developed. Chz,irr{jar? Deithloff. asked if there were any addit.iontal proponents. There being none, lie tasked if there were any opponents. Page Severn - Planning & Zoning- Commission - July 3, 1984 1.984-100 Jim Sturges, 108 Nutmeg; 'rim Eckersley, 2904 Unda Lane; and Teresa Cramer, 109 Nutmeg; stated they were opposed to the rezoning becar3se the property, just north of Cirnn€ rnnon Ridge Addition was recently zoned for single family attached ho sing to provide a buffer t,etween the c.r}rr.rr.er vial and their residencies. The current single family attached buffer line matches that across North Main Street. They want the buffer zone to remain. There being no additional opponents, Chairman Deithloff closed the public hearing. Tile Commission me-mbers were equally concerned with the homeowners and felt there Should be a buffer area. The majority agreed that they could support the project with the assurance of a PD. Mr. Elliott stated they could corne back with a variation of the request to provide a buffer. Mr. Knight explained that the public hearing was cios-.ed and there would be no farther notice to the property owners. After additional discussion, Mr. Elliott requested the ;coning ease be tabled. Mr. Tyson made a motion to reopen the public hearing. Mr. McMillon seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes- Messrs. Tyson, e±/iillon, Hill, Ingram, lryneh & .Deithloff, and Mrs. Park Nays: None Chairman Deithloff declared the motion carried. Mr. Harold Copher, 1804 N. wain Street, Euless, stated his willingness to work with the homeowners to provide a. buffer and agreed to meet with the homeowners. Mr. Lynch nnade a motion to table horning Case #84-17 until July 17th. Mrs. Park seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Mrs. .Park and Messrs. Lynch= Ingrain, Tyson, hill. McMillon & Deithloff Nays: None Chairman Deithloff declared the motion carried. V1. I'U'BL1C HEARING - ZONING GASE "84-18 - REQUEST OF y� AS.I-TTNGTi3'�'/WALL��CI:;, _._..--------------------_----------- ------------------------ 1N+ <, E`TGII�TE.ERS AN13 T'LANP�YEIT.S, FOR i'I€r114C1E Crl Z;rNING C). I rI'Ii C;J' 1 Ckl .-....... - 'I'HE J.H. 1TAVINS SURVEY, A-68i, 21.0 53 ACRES OF TO C-r", AN.D PLIN.NED FOR CAB kT,,kSYI F �T7W RE AND HOSI'I'1'AL T UIi- 1 ,.E E ?dI) EQUII'MEN`l' HENOVATION, LOCATED ON THE SOUT11EAST - -- -- CORNER. -.._-------------------------------------- ................ ------ OF GLADE iO �1) � �D CHEEK �ftT ' ROAD, WEST, Chairnman Deithloff opened the public hearing and explained that the proponents would be heard first and. them the opponents. Page_j�'_ight - Manning & Zoning Commission July, 3, 1984 1984-101 ............. .......... Bill Deacon stated lie is returning, as the Commission requeste.d, with a developrnent plan to allow the existing businesses on that property. In re4fxonse to the comment in Rod 1'vlerls letter coneerning an all weather surface fire lane and Parking, he stated that because this use is proposed as a short- terni use, they had propose. to use _ that W0111 C.j gravel. surface or, the fire lane I d support fire equipment. Chairman Deithloff stated that he has seen in sorne developments where a minimum of six inches of erushed stone base is of sufficient thickness to support a fire engine. There being no additional proponents or opponents, Chairman Deithloff closed the public hearing. M.r. Tyson stated he would be in favor of this zoning case subject to Nair. Tyler's letter. y lr. Lvneh una.de a motion to recomrnend approval of Zoning Case #84-18 subject to Itod Tyler's letter dated June 28, 1984, with the fire lanes being constructed with some type of all weather surface such as a minimum of six inches of crushed stone with penetration pavement or some other alternative that is approved by the engineering staff. Mr. Hill seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes: J'Vlessrs. 1.,ynch, Hill, • cMillon, Ingrain, Tyson & Deithloff, and Mrs. Park Nays- None ff declared Chairumn Deithlo the motion carried. VII. ELECTION OF OFFICERS .................. Chair.-nan Deithloff opened the floor for nominations -for the office of Chairman. .Mr. ANIcMillon expressed his thanks, for Mr. Deithloff's chairman.-,hip. In light of the fact. that Mr. Deitfiloff did not want to be considered for Chairman, Mir. Mc.Millon norninated John Lynch as Chairman, There were no other non--imations and Lynch was elected unanhylously as Chairman. Chairman I.ynch opened the floor for the office of Vice-Chairman.. Mr. Me Millon nominated. John Deithloff for Vice-Chairman. There were no other nominations ;:end 1,V1r. Deithloff was elected unanii-nously as Vice- Chairman, Chairman Lynch opened the floor for the office of Secretary. 114rs. Park nominated Larry, Ingrarn as Secretary. There were, no other nominations and Mr. Ingram was elected unardynously as Secretarv. Page Nine Planning -, Zoning { cm rtss ion Jul- 3, 1984 10,84-102 _ - - Vill. ADJOURNNIENT rC�here being no further business �o L°r�rrc�Ea<�t, 1Ytc meetit7g adjourned at 11:10 �S<ra. i i l { Y e Llr