The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984-08-21 19$1+-125 AGENDA Planning & Zoning Commission 201 N. Ector ]:give Euless, Texas August 21, 1084 7:00 p-n. - Pre-Comu'�ission Meeting to Discuss Agenda Items 7:30 p.m. - Call to Order for Cor.,rnission Consideration of Scheduled Iteins INVOCATION APPROVAL OF 101INUTES - Regular Meeting bated August 7, 1084 OLD BUSINESS 1. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEA :.1NG Zoning, Case - Amended request of Triland Development, Inc., for a etaaragc c}f canir�; Oil `Tract 5. Tucker Survey, A-x.512, 4.2952 ��ires of land, 'located at the northeast c=orner of Fuller-Wiser '11oad & viid-Cities Blvd.; and Tract 6), Tt. Cro vvley Survey, A-312, 1.8744 acres of land, Ioeated on the northeast corner of Duller-tViser Road & Harwood Road; from C--1 to Planner Development .for C-1 uses and gasoline station. i Eta; BUSINESS 11, CONSIDER. PLAIT ING: P--84--49 Combined Preliminary and final. Plat for t"iestpar°k. Cane, located west and adjacent to tJestpark Way, north of t-Viest Pipeline Road, south of Westpark lay Estates, and east of Bedford City Limits. 111. PtT.B- IC HEARING Zonings Case #84-23 - Requ.est. of Larry Emery, .fora change of zoning on lots 1 && 2, Block 1; Lots 1, 2, 3.1., & 32, .Block 4; Lots .1. & 9, Bloc k 5; and Lots I - 3, Block G Park Cre�,trnoor Addition, 2 acres of land, located south of .Airport Freewas,-, %^lest o;" South Ec.tor Drive., north of SI1 10, and east of Furris Cafeteria; from R--1 to C-2. IV. PUBLIC HEARING Zoning Case 484-24 Request of Hagar Construction, Inc., for a change of zoning on Tract 1 B5 and 1134A, B. Harrington Survey, 6.862 nacres of land, from R-1 t10 R--1--'1, located west and adjacent. to Braze Road and north, east and south of Carlisle Pines Addition. V. PUT AC HEARING Zoning Case X84--25 Request of DIE Development, Inc., for a change of zoning on Tracts 1. and ID, .1. v atson Survey, 22 cadres of land, from 1s.--1 to R--4 and C-2, located north and adjacent to West Pipeline Road and S.H. 10 and east of w estpark 1" ay. 1984-127 VI. DISCUSSION - PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION ZONING DISTRICT ABBREVIATIONS R--1 - Single Family Detached Dwelling District -RIA Single T'€roily Attached Dwelling District R-2 Two-Family l:)well.inn District R-3 Multi-Family Dwelling District., 12 Units to the Acre R-4 - ul.ti- amily Dwelling District, 16 Units to the Acre R-5 Multi--I:afnily Dwelling District, 24 Units to the Acre C-1 Neighborhood Business .District. C-2 - ConamunitN; Business District Is-1 Limited Industrial District 1-1 - bight Industrial District I-2 Heavy Industrial District CUB} - C.`omi-nunity Unit Development PD Planned Development SP - Specific U-se Permit. 1984--128+ Regular Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission August 21, 1984 CALL TO ORDER The remilrar meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:33 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Euless City Hall by Chairman <John Lynch. MEMBERS & STAFF PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT John Deithloff None Robert AlcMillon John Lynch Larry Ingram Carolyn Park Carl Tyson Jack Mill .James Knight, City Engineer Pod Tyler, Sertior Planner Jim :McKanna, Project Engineer Annie,cae Vargas, Staff. Secretary VISITORS Larry 1'. Emery M. F. & Alberta Owens Mile Barbara Elo wderi Doer & Lou White Joyee Sherbin Revice & Mazell Oven Becky & Arlen Ewart Ben C. 'hate Kay R. Fuller Henry V. Kitchens Steve .Rahn Joy `T'. Brake Gloria Lay Rebecca Batkin L. T. &- Ma.ry Hale Lisa I'AOAurrey Helen Davies harry Reiss Mary & Steve '11dey Gary & Shelley Linduf f Donald & Joan Brown Alan Bond :Toe Evans Ellen & Brad Jones Mrs. Willie V'I e McCormick Mike Sherrill Katherine Ingram Richard .Drummonds 'ferry L. Sandlin Perry Hagar Billy Ifeitrnan Jan & Millard Jumper AN-D ,'NUMEROUS OTHER CITIZENS INVOCATION The invocation. w, given by �<r. Jahn IieitPrl.off. Page "Ilwo -- P,arining & zoning Corn,rnission - Aucist 21, 1384 1.984-129 APPROVAL OF MINUTES I'lie minutes of the regular meeting; dated August a, 1.984, were approved, as anionded, to read as follows- Pacre Seven - First para rn h should read as follows: Mir. Tyson states: that niarlc-eting for gasoline has changed since the Zoning Orcl.irva.noe vvas written in the 1950'x. He reeornmer-ded that the Commission should loot: at the ordinmice to determine where gasoline sales should be within the ordinance. OLD BUSINESS I. CONTtNUA`fION- OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONING CASE «84--19 - AMENDED REQUEST OF 'TRILAND l.)EVELOP'YrE14T, INC., FOR A CIiZN-(,'E OF /ONIR'i3 ON `FRACT 5, S. TUCKER SURVEY, A-1512, 4.2952 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT TIII: NOIL'lHl., �I ("O-rI.NFl� O_l� FULLER-WISER ROAD 6 MID-CITIES f;LVD.j AND `I'E,:�CT 6, R. CROI'iLE�. St Z-_R�'l:Yr?...�?�-,�1._?, 1.8�� ACRES OF LAND, LOC.A.1.115 OIL' THE NORTIIY S'I' COhNFII OF FULLER-WISER ROAD & Il.f11: WOOD ROAD; FROM C--1 TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR C--2 USES AND GASOLINE STATION Chairman Lynch presennteA a letter from Triland Development, Inc., which requested that this case be tabled until the September 4, 1984, meeting. The petitioner is contemplating .withdrawing, his request. for a fail-service station on Mid-(.:.ities Blvd., but that fie may continue. to request gasolino sales on that site. Nlr. John Deithloff made the motion thaat. the Commission grant Mr, Stak's request to table this zoning ease until. September 4, 1984, and to continue the publics hearing at that tirne. Mirs. Park seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows. Ayes- Messrs. 'Tyson., Hill, Ingram, Lynch, Me Millon, Deithloff. & 11rs. Park, Nays: None Chairman Lynch declared the motion carried. NEW BUSINESS II. CONSIDER T'T.;A`I"i'ING - P--84--49 - COMBINED .PE'EI.IMI.NARY AND FINAL PLAT - - --------------------------- -- - - ........ FOR WESTPARK, ONE, .LOCATED l��'.EST AND ADJACENT TO Tti'.EST.PA.RK WAY, __ _..------------------------------- - Nt):ii.'T'1i UP Wi ST PIPELINE ROAD, SOU'TI-I. OF I ESTPARK WAY l S`.lAT. .S. AND E AST OT' rEDF0RD CITY LIi�II`I`S Page Three; - Planning & toning Commission - August 21, 1 384 1984-130 Mr. I'fete Hennessey, Hennessey Engineering, stated that he had net with Staff to discuss the subject plat. Mr. Knight stated that N'lr. llerrnessey had met all requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance regarding platting and he recommended approval of the plot provided the developer place with the City a Perpetual Maintenance Agree;rnent on drainage easements that cut through the property. ?'lr. I rxight further stated that the drainage syste.rn is underground and exceeds the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance (t.he ordinance requires an undergrMnd systern be dc-signed on a five-year return frequency storm). the Miraia-.airM that -Mr. Hennessey has designed will accoinmodLate in excess of a twenty-five (25) year return to storm. Drainage easements provided will. accommodate the overflow above: the 2._t year up to the 100 year return frequency storm. The Perpetual Maintenance Acre erraent requested assures that drainage easements rrts provided by platt.irri; will be kept free of obstructions on the above-ground easement. Mr. Hennessey stated that tie would comply with Mr. 1�rright's request. Chairman Lynch inquired as to the future improvement Mans of TVestpark Way in regard to this project. Ylr. Knight stated that Mr. Hennessey had prepared a cost estimate for the developer's pro-rata shore of the paving. funds will be escrowed with the City to cover Vie cost of paving, of one-half of the 49 foot back-to-back of curb streets as t1 he property can the other side of the project develops or when the City desires to complete the roadway. A unit cost breakdown for the paving has been included to cover the paving, sidewalks, excavation, and related drainage that would be associated with it. lie further stated that there is an 80 foot right--of-way existing for West Pipeline Road. fUr. Deithlo`f made a motion to approve the final plat, including requiring the above referenced Per°pettr.al. ilai.ntenance Agreement for the drainage easement. 11r. .ingrar.= seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes: ;tilessr°s. Ingram, Bill, Deithloff, Lynch, 'Tyson, 'Mot—'lillon, and Mrs. Park-- Nays: None Chairman Lynch declared the motion earried. III. PUBLIC; I EATUNG - ZONING CASE 1-:184-2-3 -- REQUEST C�1�' LARRY EMERY. FOR A CH Al's =E OF ZONING ON .LOTS I <X 2, .f-TE )CK 1, LOTS 1, 2, 81, & 32, BLOCK 4; LOTS 1 &- 9, BLOCK 5; AND LOT'S 1 - 3, 13LOC II� 8 PARK CREST b'OOR ADD1.r€101, 2 ACRES OF LAND, LOCA`.l`.liD SOUTH OF AIRPORT FltEEVYAY, V f".ST OF SOUTH LA;1-`OR, DRIVE, i`101-I.'T`H OF SH 10, AND EAST' OF -1.,U3..P'S C.:3FETETIIA; Fll,e�M R- 1. ` O C�-2 -------------------------------------------- Pa&e Four - Plannin g Zoning Commission �- August 21., 1.934 1964-131 Chairman Lynch stated the rules and opened tare Public Hearing by asking for proponents of this request. Mr. Larry Emery, 100 R-idgecrest, petitioner for the request, submitted copies of the: Plat of the area and summarized the history of the de.vel.opanent. Ile discussed how the noise, pollution, and traffic from airport. Freeway was disrupting his neighborhood. ylr. Emery was further concerned with the safety of the children as they travelled to school or played in the neighborhood. Ife also felt that the homes in Park Crestmoor are not marketable:. Ms. Barbara Bowden, 1.03 Windward Way; Ms. Lou White, 101 S. Sheppard; 11r. a.ilton Owens, I0.1 .Ridgecrest; Ms. Rebecca I3atkin, 306 Itidgecrest; Mr. R. 11. Owens, 103 Ii,idgeerest; and Mr. Mike Bowden, expressed their concern for the ssrfety of the children, pedestrians crossing the freeway, pollution and excessive noise from: the freeway, traffic taking shortcuts through tbe:ir neighborhood, and weeds on vacant lots that obstruct the view of motorists. Chairman lynch read a letter that he had received frorn Harold Copher, one of the property owners named in this zonings request.. Mr. Copher was unable to attend the meeting due to a serious; illness. The letter stated, "I will be unable to attend the Public': flearing for Zoning Case T#84--21:3, but Its=ould like to leave You enter into your records my approval for the rezoning from R--1 to C-22." 5,tr. Knight remarked that staff had received a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Jinn Carroll, owners of Lots 6 & 7, Block A, Sheppard Addition in which they both approved the request for rezoning. Chairman Lynch then asked for any opponents. Vernon Nash, 105 Windward Wavy, sUited that he had no disagreement with the request, but lie Ranted to know, ghat commercial property would be, Located there:. Ile objected to having a convenience store next to his property. He further inquired about .living on property that had been zoned commercial. Mr. Knight. and Chairman Lynch suggested that the zoning would fallout a variety of urns, such as gas service station, convenience store, etc. lr. Tyson explained that a convenience. store 3-night not necessarily be built there. Mr. Nash also wanted clarification on the 200 foot requiren-,ent, of which Chairn-,an Lynch explained how the property owners were notified. Chairman Lynch also explained the uses of commercial and residential zoning. Mrs. Helen Davies.. 21.4 Sheppard; Mr. Jay McGinnis, 103 Ridgecrest; Mr. Bill Trussell, 205 tVindward Way; Nir. Henry Kitchens, 109 Ridgeerest. Mr. Ben Taturn, 203 Skyway; L. T. .tlr.le, 206 Ridgecrest; Mrs. Joy Brake, 216 S. Sheppard; and Mrs. Clloria Lay, 220 S. Sheppard, expressed their concern that the rest of the neighborhood was being neglected; traffic would be increased, the safety of the children would be its jeopardy, property values would. decrease, taxes would increase, and it would be difficult for homeowners to reinodf:1 or rebuild. Pave Five - Planning & Zoning Commission - august 21, 1984 1984-132 Chairman Lynch asked for a show of hands from the citizens who opposed this rea€lest, of which there was approximately 15 hands. Mr. Kitchens felt that the City had let them down regarding the heavy traffic through the neighborhood due to the new signal .light at Ector and S.H. 10. Chairman Lynch remarked that P & Z had no control over traffic safety, but he would instru0 staff to conduct an investigation and make recommendations. Chairman Lynch them closed the PUblrc Hearing and asked for discussion a1D011g the P 3c Z. The members generally agreed that either all of the neighborhood should go commercial, or none of it should. `lvson did not feel that commercial zoning was needed because .A was an established neigliborhood and had a residential atmosphere. He expressed his concern with traffic in Park Crestmoor. Chairman .1 vnch stated that this area would} need :a Planned Development before lie could support a change. Mr. Hill; made a motion to recominend denial of Zoning Case, #84-23. Mr. Deithloff seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Ayes: Mrs. Park, Messrs. .ingram, Hill, Deithloff, Lynch, Tyson, and N-1cfV11illon. Nays: None Chairman Lynch declared the motion carried. Chairman lynch declared a five-minute break. At 8:40 p.m., the meeting reconvened. 1V. ZONING CASE 484-24 -- REQUEST OF H GAR. CONSTRUCTION, INC., FOR A CHANGE OF ZONING, ON TRAt:'T 1&5 and 1.I34A, B. A11,1i,1NIGTON SURSURVEY, f> ."u - 11 - ................... ACRES Of, LAND, FRO€11 R.-1 TO R--1-A, LOCATED WEST AND ADt)'ACENT TO RAZE ROAD AND .NORTH, EAST AND SOUTH OF CARLISLE PINES ADDI'f1C39 Chairman Lynch stated the rules and opened the Publics Hearing by asking for proponents of this request. Mr. Mike Sherrill, Hcagar Construction, presented the request for rezoning. He fe.it that this zoning would be compatible with the surrounding zoning. lie desired standard zoning to speed tip the zoning request. lie further ;added that the R-1-A would be more defined than a Planned De:velopnient.. N-1r. Tvson was concerned with the kind of single-family attached dwellings and parking for the; sutKlivision. Mr. Sherrill renaa.rked that lie had met with staff to discuss the adjacent properties. He said that the parking would be in the rear of the dwelling. He had no problem with P & Za making that point a part of a motion. C-;hairinan Lynch added that there would need to be a reciprocal deed requirement in order for that to be enforceable by the property} owners. Page Six -- Planning & Zoning Cominassion _ AUgust 21, 1984 1084-133 My. "Tyson wanted a deed restriction regarding parkitag, atrel wanted to know if the adjacent property owners would be able to get deed restrictions. lie asked if deed restrictions would be filed at time of platting. Chairman Lynch and Mr. Knight stated that deed restrictions would be made at - platting time. C hairman Lynch then asked to hear any proponents; there being none, he asked for opponents. 'There being none, Chairman Lynch closed the public hearing. Mr. 11 night explained the R-1-A zoning district in the zoning ordinance. He referred to previous subdivisions who asked for variances from the standards that were set up for single-fant.ily dwelling districts. The staff was instructed to devise an R- 1--A zone. lie stated that this zoning request was the first of its size to make such a request for 'R-1-A. Chairman Lynch was concerted with speculation of lot configurations. The streets would be 31 foot back-to-track with a 50 foot right-of-way. Mr. 'Tyson expressed his concern with what could happen at platting time regarding alley ways and right-of-ways. Mr. Knight suggested that there could be driveways between the units. ltIr. Tyson made a request to see a lot layout at the time of platting. Mr. Ingram concurred with Mr. Tyson regarding alley ways and parking. He also desired to see lot layouts at platting time. Mr. Deithloff made a motion to approve of Zoning Case 'r84-24 as presented, ,Mr.. Hill seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Ayes: Mrs. Park, Messrs. Ingram, Hill, Deithloff, Lyrach, McMil:l.on, and Tyson Nays: Norge Chairman Lynch declared the motion carried. V. P[ll=1l.,.lC" HEARING - ZONING CASE 484-25 -- REQUEST OF D/F l:ll?w1-"1_;0PMENT, INC., FOPS A. C,'Fi:�" GE OF ZONING-4 ON TRACTS 1 A.NI) 1D, :�. IlATS4N SURVEY, 22 ACRES OF LAND, F11W.-I l:I.--1 TO R-4 AND C--?, ta(3C;A`l`lalJ ittll.TH Aril-} ADJACENT TO l'iE',S`1' PIPELINE ROAD A9b S.H. 1tl .ANI-) EAST OIL WESTPA.tt.t4. W, Chrair.man Lynch explained the males and opened the, public hearing. Mr. William Peifer, representative, of D/F Development, felt that the north area needed a buffer for the s ingle- family. He described the attractiveness of the tract and explained the expense that would be incurred in regard to drainage a.nd flood- plain. lair. Peifer was of the opinion that this property worald be compatible with Pam Seven - Planning & Zoning Commission - Aggust 21, 1984 1984-134 surrounding properties. He discussed a drawing that showed ttae future development and neighboring developments. I-le stated that the property to the north would be developed as a single project. The single family would be subdivided out and sold to builders. Chairman Lynch asked Mr. Peifer to explain what was to be planned as far as the standard units in the R-4 section was concerned. Mr. Peifer stated that the density would be kept at .l.6 u/ a for the 18 acres. The units would be 75% wood and masonary and would be two story. 18% would. "be efficiency, 700 square feet, one bedroom. The studio apartments would be approxir-nately 1,03 6 square feet. The eight duplex units would have their own individual entrances 6innilar to condos.) and be approximately 950 square feet. The average square feet would be a little over 800. Mr. Tyson inquired about the roads that are to be included in the request as well as existing roads. Mr. Peifer stated that Mrs. Clark, owner of the honne on tti estpark 1. 'ay, had approved a street through tier propert:,% that would exit onto Westpark Way. Chairman Lynch theca asked for additional proponents. Mrs. Kay Fuller, Box 23 7, expressed her desire to see this request pass. Mr. Ric-hard Drunnnnonds, president and 50% owner of D/F Development, discussed the .attractiveness of the property and the cases of the surrounding properties. fie felt that his company would develop a quality product. There being no other proponents, Chairman Lynch entertained opponents to this zoning case. Mrs. Becky Lwart, 2404 Westpark Way Circle; Mrs. Jan Juniper, 2514 t'cestpark Way Circle; Mr. Gary Guthrie, 602 Live teak Drive; and Mr. Brad Jones; 2405 Westpark Way Circle, were opposed to this zoning request. It was felt that only the ex.i4ting pr°oper°ty owners would benefit from: this development, the increase in school-aged children would interfere with the quality of the TIER set,ools, there was no need for more inulti-family zoning in this area, and that the beauty of the area Mould be destroyed. There being no additional opponents, Chairman Lynch closed the public hearing. Mr. Deithloff stated that he did not want RV-4 in back of C-2 and declared his opposition to this ease. Tie did agree with the C-2 portion of the request. Mrs. Park felt that the frontage on Pipeline could be C-2. Sh.e opposed pocket zoning, and thus opposed this ease. Mr, CMill0n Was canc'erned with the drainage on the property; he desired that the property remain R-1. dire to the density that had been proposed. Pare Eight_--_Plan-_Planning & Zoning Commission - Auvst '21, 1984 1.984-1.35 Chairrn�an Lynch was concerned cS�it.Pr Qr��itt�3e problcrYrs ar�rl felt tl��# there v�vrild 1�e major planning problems in developing this property. Ile stated that lie would support this request if it was a. PD; and was concerned with the number of units per, acre, traffic flow, and terrain. Ile did riot totally oppose this case because of the zoning on the surrounding property, but was not in favor of category zoning. Mr. Tyson opposed multi-farnil.y in this area and did riot totally agree with C-2 oil Pipeline. He expressed his desire to see R°I and C--1 on the property in this zoning case. A-1rs. Park made a motion to recommend denial of Zoning, Case #84-25) irk order to keep the present R-1. zoning on this area. Mr. Deithloff seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Ayes; sirs. Park, Messrs. Ingrain, Hill, Deithloff, Lynch, Mclrlillon, and Tyson Nays: Done VI. DISCUSSION -- PRC)IjER`-1"Y OWNER NOTIFICATION Chairman .Lynch asked for a report by staff regarding the notification of property owliers in zoning; cases. Mr. Rod Tyler, Senior Planner, distributed pictures that had been taken r=cgar ding zoning change signs that had been placed inappropriately and how the s.ipens had been relocated so as to be, more visible. Ile stated that steps would be taken in the future to prevent these problems. Ir°. Tyler explained the current procedure that is followed to notify property owners of zoning changes. Ile then made the following proposal: 1. Continue to notify from last approved tax rolls as per state law. 2. Continue: placing• sign; on the property. 3. Notify all property owners within 200 feat. of the zoning change by addPessing correspondence to "Citizen" according to platted .lots. These notices will no longer be sent by certified mail, but will be ]rand delivered to the Post Office for a postmarked validation and delivery. Mr. Knight stated that this new procedure would significantly aid in notification of property owners. The roost would be &pproxinnately for#y cents as cornparec to $1.55 to send the notices by certified mail. Chairman Lynch was primarily concerned with adequately notifying property owners in the most efficient way possible. Air. Deithloff inquired as to .newspaper notification. Mr. Tyler stater. that a notice is published in the newspaper after P & L hears the case and before the ease is heard by the City Council. Pic;_-N.ftie..-._Planning a Zoning.Com nissian - ,kqg!�t___21, 1994 1.984--136 Mrs. Liz Newlin, Mid---Cities Daily News, stated that she does not get an agenda far enough in advance to publish a copy in her paper. Mr. Deithloff made a motion that the P & ' adopt the new property owner notification as presented by Mr. Tyler. Mr. Ingram seconded the motion, and the t=ote is as follows: Ayes. Mrs. Park, Messrs. ingrain, Hill, Deithloff, Lynch, -Me.Tilton, and Tyson 'days: None ADJQl:RNi111=iti``l' Them-: tieing no further business to conduct, the meeting adjourned at 9:42 D.n;. C:hairmfin