HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-11-20 1 984-168
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
Planning of Zoning Co mission
201 N. Ector Drive
Euless, Texas
Novernbc r 20, 1984
7:00 p.- . -- Pre-Cm
mission Meeting
7„30 - Call to Order for Commission Consideration of Scheduled Items
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting October 16, :1984 and Called Meeting
October 23, 1984
NEIW .BUSTNE'SS
Y. CONSIDER PLATTING - #P-84-57
Cornbined Preliminary & Final flat of Lot 3, Block 1, and Lot 4, Blo(c.k 2,
Parkview Addition, located west and adjacent to Westpark Way, east and adjacent
to Euless,/Bedford City Limits,, and north of W(,,stpark Way Estates.
IT. CONSIDER PI.AY.rI.NG - #P-84-53
Final Plat & Engineering Plans of Lot 6 & 711 Block 21 Airport Business Park,
located north and adjacent. to South Pipeline Road, west and adj€acemt to Airport
Drive, and south of Sor.rth Air„x3rt Circle.
III. C.:ONSIDER, PLATTING - #P-1214-61
Prelin-driary 1?11.t of "Harwood Court - Phases I & It, located east and adjacent to
North '.,..a.in Street. south and adjacent. to Harwood Road.
Al. PUBLIC I-TEARING ” #Z-84-311.
Request of Westhaven Interests for a change of zoning on portions of Tracts 113
& 2, 1% A. Cash (A-280) and portion of 'Tract 5E, T. Jasper, A-861, a total of
2.86 acres of Imid, from R,-3 to C-l., located south of Airport Freeway, east of
ltiestpark Way, and north and ,adjacent to Parkwood Addition.
V. P1."1- LIC HEARING - #Z-84-32
Bequest or Triland Development, Inc., Venture Manager, for �a change of zoning
on Tract ), S. 'l. ekyer A-1512, (4.2952 acres), from C-1 to Planned .Development
for C...I uses with Gas Sales, .Ideated at the northeast comer of Fuller-Wiser Ra;.id
Mid-Cities Blvd.
Request of Tri.land Development, Inc., Venture �,,m a; er, for a change of zoning
of a portion of Tract 5, R.. Crowley A-312 (1.8744 acres), from C--1 to Planned
Develol3merrt for C, 1 uses with Gas Sales, located at the northwest corner of
Fiff ler--Wiser Load (new ali.gnaaent) & Harwood Road.
3.984-°16:1
VL PUBLIC" HEARING -- #Z-84-:33
Request of Bell Ranch 'Terrace Joint Venture (Wayne MI. Brewer, Venture
Alanager) for a change of zoning on Lots 9 & 1.9, Block 3, and lots 5, 6, & 7,
Bieck 4, Bell Ranch Terrace Addition, a total of 1.5 acres of lend, from R-1 to
i;-', located south of l`,ii.less 'I'oclri Center, `vb'e4t of F.M. 357, north of Signet, and
east of proposed Brasher Drive.
VII. PUBLIC HEARING - 4FV-84-01
Request of Joaquin Sanchez, Jr., for a variance from the Fence Ordinance to
permit a. fence two and one-half feet. (91-1/2") Higher than the eight foot (81011)
maximum currently permitted by Ordinance, located rt 304 Morrison Court. in
Bear Creek Estates.
`.'Ili. PUBIJC I1.t AR"ING - #FV-84-02
Request of ocean Marie Williamson for a variance from the Fence Ordinance to
permit a fence to extend into the required side yard of a. corner lot., located at
2901 Lemon cane in Cinnamon Ridge.
TONING DISTRICT ABBREVIATIONS
R-1 - Single Family Detached Dwelling District
RIA - Single Family Attached Dwelling District
R-2 - Two-Family Dwelling District
R.-3 nJ ulti--Farnily Dwelling District, 12 Unit--, to the Acre
R-4 - Multi.-Family Dwelling District, 16 Units to the Acre
R--5 - Multi-Family Dwelling District, 24 Units to the Acre
C-1 - ive.ighborhocxl Business District.
C-2 - Community Business District
L--1 - Limited Industri i.l Di.st.r.ict.
I--1 Light Industrial District
1--2 _ -Heavy Industrial. District.
CUD - Community Unit Development
PD Planned Development
P - Specific Use Permit
1-984-1740
Regular Meeting
Planning & Zoning Commission
November 20, 1984
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Plar3ning & Zoning C:ominission was called to order at 7.36
p.m. in the Council Chambers of Euless City Hall by Chairman John Lynch.
MEMBERS & STAFF 1P.REST:.I':-T MEMBERS ERS ABSI NT
John Lynch Carolyn Park
Robert McMillon
-Larry .Ingram
John Deithloff
Jack Hill
Carl Tyson
James Knight, City Engineer
Rod Tyler, Senior Planner
Jinn �1cKanna, Project Engineer
Becky Null, Office Coordinator
VISITORS
Alan A. De.bevec dark D. Grair
Pater Staks Doug 'Ylikeworth
Hiram Lail re Mr. & Mrs. Baker
Walter ter Con Mr. & Mrs. Ben Pace
Mrs. Sanchez 'Willie Mae McCormick
Carol. falters R. A. Bowles
Mario Stefaanone Dennis Scifres
Wayne M. Brewer Joy Robles
Ernesto Robles Huey If. .Ball
Kennv Akin Marc Drasin
Jean Marie Williams kill Garcia
Mike Bailey Jerry Chewauct
'T'err, Allen Claudia Pippenger
INVOCATION
The ini,Joc:ation was given by Mr. Lynch.
1.
PUI--'31,IC HEARING TO CONSIDER PLATTING - #.P-8 -W - COMBINED PIi.T.T-:i4i. NARY
& FINAL PLAT OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1, AND LOT 4. BLOCK 2, PAR.KVIEW ADDITION,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'.'O ; I l) 'x'11l1S`.l` AN.L) t T-6 W-E'9TRARR WAY, AND ADJA l:N'l' '1O
EULESS%BEDPC�RD CITY LIMITS, AND NORTH OF WEST'PARK WAY ESTATES 1.11
Mr. Denny l afner, Washington' Inc., presented the Prelirninary & Final l-'Tatting
of f'ar�kview Addition. lie explained the majority of the devel:opmerit lies within Bedford
and includes 500 niultif.ain ly units and mixed commercial uses. The portion that lies in
Page Two, Planning & Zoning Commission, November 20, 1984 1984-171
€-.tie City of Euless is zoned for commercial uses and is divided into two lots (2.55 acres)
by a proposed collector street.
Chairman Lynch stated fie was concerned with a. coo.€lector street dumping traffic into
Euless from a multifamily development in Bedford. I-le stated that he thought a t.ra.€'f.ic
impact study should be prepared so the itnpact could be evaluated.
In response to a. question from Mr. Deithloff, Mr. Knight stated he has not received copies
of the Perpetual Maintenance Agreement.
Mr. Knight stated that the Traffic Safety Coordinator liad reviewed the proposed plat and
was concerned with the number of ;curb cut; on Westpark Wray, and therefore,
recommended that access be Urnited only to Parkvi.ew Drive.
Mr. Tyson cofnmented that lie was very concerned with a multifamily development
located in another city utilizing Westpark Way as their primary access to and from
Airport Freeway. He stated that since the commercial property in Euless could be served
from Westpark Way thn.t lie could see no positive effect that a street at this location
could benefit the Citv of Euless. Mr. Tvson made a motion to recommend denial of the
Cofnbine'd Preliminary & Final Pfi.itting of Lot 3, Block 1, and Lot 4. Bloch 2, Parkview
.Addition as submitted.
Mr. Deithloff seconded the motion.
Chairman Lynch stated he world prefer to table the request and get- feedback from the
Traffic Saf ety Coordinator.
'Phe vote was as follows:
Aves: Messrs. Deithloff, Ingram, Tyson, hill and 1'lz�fvli.l.lo.n
Nays: Mr. Lynch
Chairrian Lynch declared the .notion carried.
II.
CONSIDER PLATTING - P--84--59 -- FINAL PLA`.l-' & ENGINEERING PLANS OF LOT 6 &
.I�.I.:OC;K. 2, AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK, LOCATED NORTH AND AIDJA.c�`E1' T TO
SOUTH PIPELINE ROAD, WEST AND ��DjAC.;T;N' ' TC-1 Alli..l='t3.li.T DRIVE, AND SOUTH OF
------------- f (� f CIRCLE -- ...........------------------
SOUTH Mr. Dennis Scifres, Metro Equities, Inc., presented the request for Final Platting of Lot 6
& 711, Block 21, Airport Business Park addition. Her stated that they would be extending
Airport Drive south to intersect with S. Pipeline before the Atlas Match Plant. building,
proposed for the site, is finished.
Mr. Knight stated that no water will be available to one of the lots along Pipeline until
the City planned sixteen inch (16") water line is in place. He further stated that the
water .line will fie- going to bid after the first of the dear.
Mr. Deithloff rria.de a motion to recommend approval of the Final Platting of Lot 0 & 7-R,
Block 2, Airport Business lurk Addition, subject. to Jim McKannais letter dated November
14, 1984.
Mr. NlcMillon seconded the notion, and the vote is as follows:
Page Three, Planning, & Zoning Commission, November 20, 1984 1984-172
Aye:;. Messrs. Deithloff, Ingram. 'Tyson, Hill, McMillon and Lynch
Mays: None
Chairnim-r Lynch declared the rnotion carried.
.III.
CONSII-)EJ3 PLATTING - #P-84-61 - .PREI.:€.M.€NAl1.Y PLAT OF HART'OOD COURT --
111-IASES I &: 11, LOCATED EAST AND ANI-WTV NU T.I-I NUA11+1 S`I"PUR:;1,; , SoiJ rff
Ck:>I'€' ...P Ii'�1JC?61) €
.HA O. AI3
k1r. Doug Mikeworth, Fierce-Lunsford Associates, presented the request for the
Preliminary Plat of Harwood Court. Addition. He stated that the runoff coefficients
mentioned in Jinn McK€nna's letter have been corrected.
Mr. Tyson stated that he recalled there was a /on.ing requirement to align the- private
drive with 'Pray s Drive. He noted that they do not appear to align on t1 e plat.
Mr. Knight stated that it was a Stipulation of the zoning, and the CC'+I-riMiSS.iOD COUl d
stipulate. that they align prior to final platting.
w r.°. Tyson made a motion to recornmend approval of the Preliminary flat of Harwood
Court Addition subject to Tina McKartna's Letter dated November 17, 1984, and that the
ingress and egress align with T'ravi.s Drive.
.M.P. Ingrcim seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows:
Aves: Messrs. Deithloff, Ingram, Tyson, Hill, McMillon and Lynch
Nays: None
Chairman Lynch declared the motion carried.
IV.
ZONINGS CASE i ZC-84-31 - REQUEST OF WESTHAVEN INTERESTS FOR A CHANGE' O
IN INCl UN 1'6.411,07.5 3'' 7'.IIACTS .l.B" & 2, T-.A.. CASII, A-•280, AND A. PORTION OF
TRACT 51". T. JASPER, A-861, A TOTAL OF 2.86 ACRES OF LAND, FItUN :f -3 t{> C-
1, 1.0CA.11-- €.) 'S01JF-I'H OF AIR-POR-T FREEWAY, EAST OF WESTPAIZK WAY, AND NORTH
AND ADJACENT TO PARKtbOOD ADDITION
-------------------------------------------------_............--------------------------------
Chairnin-n Lyneb gave the rules for all the 'tuning cases at this tirne stating that the
proponents ,could be heard first and then the opponents.
Mr. Huey Ball, Allied Bank Building in Bedford, represented Westhave:n Interests hi this
zoning case. He stated that on July 3, 1.984, his client. committed to returning to the
P &: Z Commission with a planned development request. On October 16, 1984, tae
submitted a planned development request, but it was not accepted by the City staff
bccalrse buildings were not planned. He, therefore, amended his application to C-1
zoning.
Lynch asked if tl ere �er e any additional proponents. There being none, he Chrairna
asked if there were any opporrent.s. There being no opponents, he deehared the public
hearing closed.
Mr. Tyson stated that lie was interested in contiguous zoning and would very muc€r like
P€age Four, Plarnirrg & Zonin6Commission, November 20, 1984 1954-1 73
to see a planned development.
Mr. Hill stated that he was concerned about the fence along the southern boundary.
Mr. all stated that he tried to submit ra planned development request.
Mr. Knight stated that it was not accepted because it Was not prepared in accordance
with the Euless Zoning; Ordinance.
C'hairmem Ia neh stated that the Commission is interested in assisting the developer,
however, in the absence of a planned development.. they are in iivor of leaving the 7,orrinh
as it is at this time.
Mr. Hill inade a motion to reeonirnc,nd denial of Zoning Case ##84-31.
Mr. Mc:ik il.lon seconded the r,%oti.on, acrd the vote is as follows:
Ayes: klessrs. f3eithloff, IngraM, 'I'ysori, Hil-1, 11110it!li.l10n and .Lynch
Nays: None
Chairman Lynch deela.red the motion carried.
V.
ZONING CASE - i# C-84-32 - REQUEST OF '-I'ff.l.l.AND l: EVE.I.;CIE'11.1.1~:NT, .INC'., E'EN.-I`I;RE
l� ANAGER, FOR A CHANGE O ZONING ON TRACT 5, S. TUCKER r�-1512, (4.2052
'Fli.A('1' fill, R. t:,.P,,OWLES' 1..I?744 ACRES), LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST .(,ORNER OF F U,LLER-y4'T.SER ld O rtf3 & vIII3 C;1'I'li:'; > & NC)R`I'IlW ES`l'
CO.t'NER OF 'vi.fl,l-.ER--FVv.ER ROAD & HAR'41i'{?CSI) T�f-?AD, l�'ROM C-I TO PLANNED
----- - - - - --------------T...----------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- -- --_
T)E�`I:I;C3l' 'IENT FC)R C'.-I ISES 1�ilT1i ( .�5 SAl.1;S
Mr. Peter 4taks, representing Triland, Inc., presented the request to rezone two parcels
of land, one at Fuller-Wiser Fond and l-larwood Road and the outer at Fuller-Wiser I3.oad
and Mid-Cities Blvd. In describing the tract at Fuller-Wiser and Harwood, Mr~. Stalks
stated that there will be a forty foot (40') buffer in addition to the twenty-five foot (25')
of right-of-w,-ay abandoned to the property owners; between the P, eadowview Addition and
the building. There Will be r7 twenty foot. (20`) landscaped buffer along Harwood. The
development involves €i convenience store wfg'asol.l.ne :merles as an anchor tenarit. I-le
further noted that only 17`s, of the land will be covered with buildings. No pole signs
will tae allowed and the facade will be 100% ninsonary except for the gr.lass windows rind
wall sign marquee. The gas islands are to be designed with the salrre material as the
buildings. Triland intends to build a, feriae along the new property .line adliacent to
-leadowview Addition, rernov%e the old paven-,ent, and grass in that area. lie presented
renderings depicting the front elevations.
Re t' tt:e property at Fuller-Wiser R-oad and ildid Cities .blvd., Mr. Staks stated there
will be a t;rYe.nt.v-five foot (25') landscaped area along Mid--Cifles Blvd. and Fuller-Wiser
Road, The parkin; lot will be landscaped and the facade will be masonarS There will.
also be a conveiiience store with gasoline Sales can this property.
�Vl.r. Sta.ks stated that Mid--Cities .Blvd. will. be. a six lane road in the future. Triland is
currently planning to pave twenty-five feet (259 of Mid-Cities lllvci. a.nd extend it into
the ::airport.
Chairman lynch asked if the rendering of the 'buildings are to be tart of the application.
Pn T•e -five - Planning~ &. Zoning Commission - November 20, 1984 1-984-114
Mx. Stales stated that he will. commit to the renderings.
Chairman Lynch asked if there were any additional proponents. There being none, he
tasked if there were any opponents.
Mr. T-3411 Garcia, 2312 Irwin Dr,, Beth Baker, 500 Parsley; Jim Baker, :100 Parsley; and
Mike Baile v, 517 Holiday, each spoke in opposition to the zoning Change at Mid-Cities and
Fuller--Wiser objecting mainly to the gas sales. They also spoke saginst the litter, crime
problem, and late hours a associated with a convenience stare.
There being no additional opponents, Chairman Lyraeh closed the public hearing.
Mr. Knight stated that the only additional rrse r°er3rzested other than what is currently,,
allowed is the gas sales.
Pile. Tyson stated that gasoline stations have changed over the years and usually are not
full service anymore. He felt that the landscaped screening; proposed by the developer
has made the gas sales .less objectionable, and lie eoul.d be in favor of the zoning change.
Mr. Deithlo.ff stated that the C-2 zoning to the east could have a gasoline station.
Mr. S:taks stated the C-2 to the east is geared to S.H. 360 and that ten acres will be lost
to the right-of-way of SAL 360.
Chairman Lynch stated that this appears to be a quality, developmeDt and .felt that the
trade-off between allowing gasoline sales on the site and the commitment of landscaping
and desirable building treatment is in the best interest to the City and neighbors.
Mr. Ingram made a motion to recommend approval of Zoning Case ff-ZC -84-37 subject to
tl:e developer providing minimum Landscaping as depicted can the development plan,
gasoline islands being; limited in size as presented to minimize the number of pumps, the
front facat;e being limited to 1.00% masonary and glass except for the sign marquee, 'and;
that they elevations displayed during the presentation be included as part of the
c evel.opanent plan.
.Llr, Hill seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Messrs. Ingram, 'Tyson, hill, McMillon and Lynch
Nays: Mr. 1.}eithl.off
Chairman Lynch declared the motion carried.
Mr. Deithloff stated that he lilted the planned development but agreed with the citizens
that gasoline sales should not go at these locations.
(Commission took a 5 1111irrug:e break at 9:1.5 rr.n.d retur-rred at 9:20 >.m.)
Vi.
ZONING CASE #I,C-84-33 llEQU1`TsS'r OF BELL RANCH '1'l;:l',..RACl:: JOINT VI':N'I1:R.E
(TTk+YNE— M. BREWER, VENTURE MANAGE FOR A CHANCE Of' ZONING, ON LOTS 9
& If.), BLOCK 3, AND LOTS 5. 6 & "a , BLOCK 4, HFLL R<. R-(11 Il 11..1'AC:lit ADDIrIIO ,
TO Al" CIF I>5 ACHES OF LAND, FROM 1;-1 to C-`?, LOCATED SOUTH OF EULISS
TOWN (TNTEF, WEST OF f.M, 15 r, Nt.3T111 C)f SMINET, AND 1?:,�ST OF I'-IICJ.POSPI)
..................................._- �. __.
€'.age Six .-...Planning- & .loni-ref:ominiszion -- November 20, 1984 1984-175
Mr. Wayne Brewer, 910 Houston St., fort Worth.. Texas, presented the reeluest for
rezoning stating that the lots will. be used to allow additional parking for the previously
approved development.
Chairman Lynch asked if there were any additional proponents. 'There being none, lie
asked if there were any opponents. There being no opponents, he declared the public
hearing closed.
Mr. Ingram made a motion to recommend -approval of Zoning Case #ZC-84-33 as
presented.
Mr. McMillon seconded the inotion, and the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Messrs. Deithlof'f, Ingram, Tyson, Hill, Melkli_llon and .Lynch
Nays: None
Chairman Lynch declared the motion curried.
VII.
.PENCE VARIA.Nc-'E #FV-84--01. -- R..T',QI:>1ST" OF ]O.A.Q[.-.TN SANCHEZ, JR., FOR. A.
VA.T TAf1Nt".l: FR.t T"'I'i-i E FENCE ORDINANCE TO PERMIT A FENCE TWO AND ONE-
-----------------------------------------------------HALE� FEET HIGHER THAN 'THE EIGHT FOOT :YlAXT U.-.-%1 c'UR.t'�.l~:.N 'LY l. I�:.Ti.:;Il. TED BY
C}1Z131_&P1. ,?5K3 €.16(5,N''.T`EIJ : 364 W11,O . -IffI U CC3UR' IN I3.I:r�.li C;I�I:.T:IE 1:�T 1T ES
Mrs. Tina Sanchez, 304 'Vlorrison Court, presented the request for a fence Variance to
allow a fence higher than what is c urrently allowed iii the ordinzarice. She :stated that
the property behind her home is on higher ground, and that the ten and one--half .foot 00
1l21) fence they have erected provides the same privacy as an eight foot (89 fence. She
presented pictures to the Commission showing the fence behind her horne.
Chairman Lynch noted that the fence was installed in two stages and that the posts do
not extend above eight foot. (8'}.
Mrs. Sanchez stated; tier willingness to -make sure it is structurally soai.rrd afacl submit a
letter• from a cuali.fied engineer stating that the fence is structurally sound.
Chairman I.yneh stated that the Board must consider specific requir=ements before
granting a fence variance. Ile asked if there were additional proponents. There being
none, he asked if there were any opf.x)nents.
Mr. Allan Debevec , 301. Westover Dr., stated that he lives behind Mrs. Sanchez. He
believes that the fence is unsightly and is concerned about the safety of his children
should the fence fall down.
Mr. Terry Allan spoke as a proponent stating he is a neighbor to the south of .l.T.s.
Sanchez. He stated that tie had no problem wi b the height of the fence if it is made
structurally, sound.
These being no additional proponents or opponents.. Chair nian Lynch closed the public
hearing.
Mr. Tyson stated he believes all the neighbors are in favor of the feriae as .ton#; as it is
aestf eti(.-all;- pleasing and the re is no safety problem.
Page Seven ... Planning N Zoning (ommission - Novernber 20, 1.984 1.984-1.76
...................................................-M-Lfl-1
'e a motion to recommend approvil of Fence Variance #FV-84-01 subject
Mr. Tvson mad
to a signed and sealed certificate by a registered professional engineer qualified in the
field of structural design stating that the fence is structurally sound enough to Withstand
area wind loads, and the aesthetics of the fence being approved by the owner of Lot 4,
Block 7, Sa-rZZ,epoint Addition.
The motion died for lack- of a second.
The Commission discussed the effects of leaving the final control with a neighbor.
It Wes brought out that the Board does riot have the power to delegate authority to the
public.
The Commission asked Mr. Debevec his opinion of aesthetics.
Mr. Debevec stated that preferably there should be a new one, piece fe-rice orle piece put
up. Otherwise, he stated the top should follow the bottom half in its slope; the top of
the current fence is not vertical all the way.
Mr. Tyson restated his motion for approval With the following provisions: that a signed
and sealed certificate by a. registered and professional engineer qualified in the field of
structural design stating that the fence is s tr tic turally sound enough to withstand area
wind load and, aesthetically, the too of the fence and railing should follow the lay, of the
band as the bottom of the fence does,
The inotion died for lack of a second.
The ConuTussion agreed that the fence needed to be higher for priv�a
cy.
Mr. Ingram stated that he could support Mr. Tyson's motion if the aesthetics were not
dealt With so extensively.
MFG II)grRI-1 MWk-, fl 1110tiOTI to grant the height variance of ##FV--84-01 having found the
requirements of Section 5.1 satisfactorily met subject to receiving a signed and
sealed certificate by a registered engineer qualified in the field of structural design
stating tbat the fence is structurally sound enough to withstand area wind loads, and that
the top half of the fence be constructed sirnilar to the bottorn half and th,,A the braces
are straightened.
Mr. Deithloff seconded the motion., and the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Messrs. Deithloff, Ingram. T,son, Hill. McMiUon and Lynch
Nays, None
Chairm,an 'Lynch declared the motion carried.
VIII.
FENCE VARIANCE #FV--84---02 -- REQUEST OF JEAN MARIE WILLIA.%dS FOR A
VARIANCE FRNF,1... YTJ"I"J'Ff...A...!7T'—N(,;T-;,"T0 EKIIEND INTO
IN
11-III. REQUIREJ.) SIDE YARD OF A CORNER LOT, LOCATED AT 2901 LEMION CANT-; Ill
..................................................................... ........................................................................................................
CINNAMON RIDGf.,.
Page Light -- Plannin-� &- Zonipg COrferniSS.IOD °- l'vo em.be.r 20, 1984
1984-177
Mr. Gary Sanado and Miss Jean ]Marie Williams presented the request for th..e fence
variance. She stated that her lot_ is of such an odd shape and design that the current fence
requirements for her side yard would be too restrictive. She stated that the fence, as
currently erected, does not clock the view of traffic or pedestrians from any angle but
rather provides her and her neighbors with more privacy. The side street, Almond Lane,
is not a through street, but ends in a cut- de-Sac in Which the wtrtefr tc)wer is locf;ted at-
the opposite end. Tier neighbors do not object to the fence and have signed a petition
stating their approval.
hairman Lynch asked for any additional. proponents.
Mr. Walter Coy,, 100 Almond Lane, also representing Mr. Jim Woodson, stated that the
:fence muffles the sound of the traffic, allows the petitioner more back yard, and affords
them privacy also and. therefore, supported the variance request.
There being no additional proponents or opponents, Chairman Lynch closed the public
hearing.
The Board agreed that the fence does not adversely affect the neighbors or the City and
is not a self--created hardship.
illf'. Ingram nmde a motion to approve the Sine yard fence variance of ;-IFV-84-02 as the
fence presently exists having found the requirements of Se-etion 5.1 adequately satisfied.
Mr. Deithloff seconded the motion, and the vote, is as .follows,
.eyes: Messrs. Deithloff., Ingram, Tyson, 11111, MC�lil.l.on afrd l.;ynch
Nays: None
Chairman Lynch declared the motion carried.
IX.
ADJOURNMENT
`Were being no further business to conduct, the meeting adjourned at 10:20 p.m.
i3t3.rr'iTfafl