HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-08-06 1.985-084
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
Planning & Zoning Commission
Ector Drive
Euless, Texas
August 6, 1985
7:00 p.fn. - Pre-Commission `vlceting
,:30 p.ni. - Call to Order for Commission Consideration of Scheduled Itez s
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular .Meeting Dated July 1.6, 1985
OLD RI_ SI.N.ESS
1. CONTINUA'T'ION OF PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION
ron.in - Case #x•85-18 - Request of C & S Development-, Inc., for a c.hant;
1985- 85
V. CONSIDER PLATTING - #P-85-41
Final. Plat of Lot 2, Block 1, Glade Crossing Shopping Center, 0.845 acres,
located south of Glade Road, west and adjacent to North Main Street, north
and adjacent and cast and adjacent to Northgate Addition.
V1. PUBLIC HEARING #W-85-24
Request of Shirley Arlcne I-Till, for a change of zoning on Tract I A3, .Edward
Taylor Survey, Abst. 1550, totaling 5 acres of land, from. R-1 to C-2, Iocmed
south of Glade Road, west and adjacent to Eviler-Wiser -Roars, and north and
adjacent to Cinnamon Ridge Addition.
VIII. REPORTS
1985-086
ZONING DISTRICT ABBREVIATIONS
R-1 Single Family Detached Dwelling District
R-lA Single Family Attached Dwelling District
R-2 Two-Family Dwelling District
R-3 Multi-Family Dwelling District, 12 Units to the Acre
R-4 Multi-Family Dwelling District, 16 Units to the Acre
R-5 Multi-Family Dwelling District, 24 Units to the Acre
C-1 Neighborhood Business District
C-2 Community Business District
L-1 Limited Industrial District
I-1 Light Industrial District
1-2 Heavy Industrial District
CUD = Community Unit Development
PD Planned Development
SP Specific Use Permit
1985-- 087
REGULAR MEETING
Planning & Zoning Commission
August 6, 1985
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:37
p.m. in the Council Chambers of Euless City Hall, by Chairman John Lynch.
MEIMBERS & STAFF PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
John Lynch Robert McMillon
John Deithloff
Carl Tyson
Larry Ingram
Jack Hill
Bill Owens
Jaynes Knight, City Engineer
Rod Tvler, Senior Planner
Jinn -MicKanna, Project Engineer
Becky Null, Office Coordindator
VISITORS
Bill Byers Barry Knight
Shirley Hill Gerald Lueeke
Jim illoore Leon Hodges, Jr.
Tom Kelly Vicki & Doug Thedford
Kevin Murray Steve & Carolyn Duff
Hal Spradling Charles Jessup
Opal & Willie Geer Robert & Leslie :Miller
and other interested persons
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Mr. Jack Hill.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting dated July 10, 1985, were approved as written.
I.
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION - ZONING CASE 485-118
REQUEST OF C & S I)I ►-EI.OPI IE`t'I', .INC'., FOR A CI-IAN(-,'E OF ZONING ON TRACT
----------------- --------------------------
K 1, J. E. WHITNER ESTATES, TOTALING 2.0 ACRES OF LAND, FKOM C--
I TO PD FOR �'IINI-W-.AR.I;'HOUSES, LOCATED EAST O.F SOUTH MAIN STREET, L1ES'I'
- _OF KNO.I-3 HILL 1Y10BILE HO'9 PARK, N" O-RTl-i AND ADJACENT TO SOUTH PIPELINq,,,
---------------- ------ ------ --
ROAD AND SOUTH O PR.0POSED WHITHER D1ZI;lE
In light of new facts to be presented, Chairman Lynch reopened the publics hearing and
explained the rules of such hearing.
'l'lr. Hal Sprad.ling, 801 Seale Street, Dallas, Texas, presented elevations and architectural
drawings showing the design of the project. He stated that all the exterior walls will
be exposed aggregate, and placed on the property Line.
PAGE TWO - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING -- AUGUST 6, 1985 1985-088
Mr. Deithloff asked if the letter dated July 23, 1985, from C & S .Development directed
to Staff is part of the development plan.
Mr. Spra.dling stated that it is.
Chairman Lynch asked if there any additional. proponents.
Mr. ,Toe Dorough, Dallas, one of the owners, stated he felt that the project will upgrade
the area.
Mr. Willie Geer, resident in Knob Hill Mobile Home Park, stated that he believes it will
be a good buffer.
Mr. John Taylor, Dallas, one of the owners, stated that he attended a meeting with the
directors of knob Hill Mobile Home Park and they have given their support for the
zoning request.
Chairman Lynch asked if there were any opponents.
Mr. Gerald Luecke, 13642 Omega, Dallas, stated that he was retained by the owner of
Spring Valley :apartments. Having designed mini-warehouse projects, he cited problems
that can occur. He noted that that the construction is typically of lower grade; design
can present fire hazards; causes security design problems; and without electricity to the
units, there cannot be lights in the units. He farther stated that an industrial use is
never used as a buffer near residential; and this use would inhibit .improvement of the
surrounding area.
Mrs. Nornma Main, 8€17 South Main, Manager of Spring Valley Apartments, presented a
petition of property owners in opposition.
Mr. Spradling rebutted Mr. Lueckefs remarks stating mini-warehouses do not excuse
traffic problems; there will be security checks several times during than night; and once
people store their items, they seldom come back.
There being no additional opponents, Chairman Lynch, closed the public hearing.
.r. Owens made a motion to recorr mend approval of Toning Case #85--18, including items
in letter elated July 23, 1985, from C & S Development to Rod Tyler acid all three pages
of the development plan.
Mr. Ingram seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Messrs. .Ingram, Owens, Deithloff & Lynch
Nays; Messrs. Tyson & Hill
Chairman Deithloff declared the motion carried.
Il.
PUBLIC HEARING - #P-85--27 - REPLAT OF LOTS 13, 14 & 15, BLOCK 5, TRAILWOOD
------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
ADDI`i'lON. 1hi'1't) 1,( `€'S 1.; .RI 14 & 15R, BLOCK? 5, '111AILt�tiE�OD ADDITION. l.038
ACRES, fbc., TED WEST AND ADJACENT TcJ SUMNiiT MIDGE DR., EAST OF
SHEN'ANDOAH DRIVE AND SOUTH cJI' TR.A.II EYL3C117 DRIVE
Chairman Lynch opened the public hearing and explained the rules governing such
hearing.
PACE THREE - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - AUGUST 6, 1985 1985-Q89
M1 Bill Byers, 308 Shadow Lane, stated that when his parent's home was built on one
of the subject lets, the regu.lati.oais were not as strict and, the house was constructed
within two feet of the property line. His parents have also donated five feet of the
center lot to the v'lethodist parsonage which is adjacent. The center lot is now under
contract for sale.
Chairman Lynch asked if there were any additional proponents. There being none, he
asked if there were any opponents. There lacing- no opponents, Chairman Lynch closed
the public hearing.
Mr. Deithloff made a motion to recommend approval of Replat 4P--85-2 7, as presented.
Mr. Hill seconded the motion, and the note is as follows:
:dyes: Messrs. Deithloff, Owens, Hill, Tyson, Ingram & Lynch
Nays: None
Chairman Lynch declared the motion carried.
Ill.
CONSIDER PLATTING #P-85-32 - FINAL PLAT OF LOT 3, BLOCK 3, LAKEWOOD
ADDITION, 141.12 ACRE:, LOCATED EAST OF F.M. 157. NORTH AND ADJACENT` TO
-- - --
----------- - - — __ ----------- ---
ASII LANE, A\TD WEST AND ADJACENT TO L_'3KE14'OOD TO4^a� TIiOUSE tlDf)l'I'IC) 3
13r. 1-kTark Hannon, Hannon Engineers, presented the request for filial platting.
'l!l.r. Hill rude a motion to recommend approval of #P-85-32, as presented.
Mr. Owens seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Messrs. Hill, Owens, Deithloff, Ingram, Tyson N. Lynch
Nuys: None
Chairman Lynch declared the motion carried.
1V.
CONSIDER. SITE PLAN - #P-85-36 -- SITE PLAN OF LOT 1, BLOCK 5, VILLAGES OF
BEAD. 4;RF1 :i�. 15'1' 1NS'1'ALI. 11~'.NT, 14.362 ACRES, LOCATED SOUTH AND ADJACENT
TO MID-CITIES BLVD., EAST ANA:) Al)JAC;ENT TO l3.EA i C;IiEEIi PA..RK44AY AND
WEST OF PROPOSED S.H. 360 - - — -
Mr. Barry Knight, representing Duke-Dallas Company, presented therequests for
variances to the parkins; and masonry requirement. Their request includes 1.75 parking
spaces p •r unit instead of the required two parking spaec_s per unit. Since sixty percent
of the units are one-bedroom, they feel the reduction is justified. They also requested
a reduction in the masonry requirement of eighty percent (80`?0) to an ;avenge of forty-
seven percent (47%).
Mr. Guest, Group Architects, Inc., presented elevations of the design of the btEildings.
The reason for requesting a masonry reduction is that cantilever elevations have been
utilized within the design which will not support brick. Chimneys cannot be con::trueted
of brick because regulations will not allow brief: to be stacked thirty-five to forty feet
high. Flat surface areas from the foundation to the roof are brick.
PAGE FOUR -- PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING -- AUGUST 6, 138; l_£}8�Ct40
Chairman Lynch asked what would be used where there is no brick. He also asked if
the units would be condos or for rent.
Mr. James Wade, Duke--Dallas Company, stated that hardboard prifned masonite Mould be
used. fie stated that the units would be rental. units.
Chairman Lynch (asked if there were any additional. proponents or opponents. There were
none.
Chairman Lynch noted that the zoning ordinance rec;uires that no more than fifty
percent of the Snits be one bedrooms. An information booklet the Commission received,
which becomes pert of the site plan, states there will be sixty-six percent one bedrooms.
Mr. Rod Tyler clarified that thirty percent efficiencies are also allowed and when none
are requested, up to eighty= percent one bedrooms are allowed.
Chairman Lvnch commented that he does not believe that the masonry requirement is
related to maintenance.
Other Ine tubers of the C'ommis.ion felt that the current masonry requirement is preferred
and should not be varied from.
Mr. Barry Knight discussed with the architects to see if anything could be done to
upgrade the masonry percentage and keep the design. fie stated that they could add
stucco to the recessed and balcony areas and have a three material facade which would
increase the masonry percentage to a minimum of sixty-five percent..
Chairman Lynch asked staff if stucco is classified as masonry.
M.r. names Knight stated that stucco has been determined to be masonry veneer.
k1r. Deithlof.f rnade a motion to recommend approval of the Site Ilan for "P--85--36
subject to the minimum masonry being an overall total of sixty-five percent with brick
being forty eight percent as drawn on the elevations, which become: part of the site plan;
with no limitations on any one elevation; and stucco added to increase masonry
percentage.
The motion died for lack of a second.
The Commission dicussed in length the desired percentages of masonry per building, per
elevation and overall total.
Mr. Tyson stated his opposition to the use of stucco.
Chairman Lynch questioned the difference it made when, the wood is located on a
building; whether it's all on one elevation or divided among all the elevations.
Mr. Guest .requested to be allowed a minimum of :sixty percent of masonry per building
with an overall sixty-five percent ;per project. He noted that most of the elevations
averaged in the seventy plus percentage range.
Mr. Deitloff made: a motion to recommend approval of Site Plan #P--85-36 with 1.75
parking spaces per unit; seventy-two percent masonry overall; sixty--five percent masonry
on any one elevation; and subbject to the elevations as presented.
PAGE FIVE - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 6, 1,985 1985-091
.....---...................................................................... ..............
Mr. Owens seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows:
ss
Ayes: Messrs. Lynch, Deithloff, Hill & Oweris
Nays: Messrs. Tyson & Ingram
Chairman Deithloff declared the motion carried.
FINAL PLA'T.' OF LOT 1, BLOCK 5, VILLAGES OF BEAR CREEK 1ST INS-FAIA'N'IENT,
.-- ..........
14.362 ACRES, LOCATED SOUTH AND ADJACENT TO MID-CWTES-9-UT)., EA-S-T----A,N 1)
Tj....I1E5T--O—F PROPOSED S.H. 360
Mr. Ben Stephenson, Engineer, presented the request for final platting.
Chairman Lynch asked if the right-of-way along S.H. 360 has been dedicated.
Mr. Stepbenson stated tie has talked with INTr. Doug Spiker of Trilandl, and be has
indicated that the property has been dedicated to the highway department.
Mr. James Knight stated that he would like some verification of the dedication.
Chairman Lynch required that verification of the dedication be submitted to staff prior
to the plat going to City Council. He asked Mr. Stephenson to address the items listed
in Jinn McKanna's letter dated July 30, 1985.
Mr. Stephenson stated that the required easernent to the City is now being processed.
1 1. 3 0 e
Regarding the assessment for drainage, curb and gutter alori& S. 6 , h stated that
they did not feel they should be assessed these charges. They did not believe that the
-i the event that this portion of the highway
highway d
ay was a part of this property an ii
is not constructed, the property would revert back to Triland.
Chairman Lynch stated that the City has adopted a policy regarding the assessment of
such improvements. The City received a letter from the State Highway Department
stating the City, will be charged for these improvements. The City will require the
developer to pay his share of the cost.
Mr. Deithloff made a motion to recommend approval of Final Plat "i.- P-85-36 subject to
Jim McKarine's letter dated July 30, 1985.
Mr. Hill seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows:
Ayes: Messrs. Deithloff, 'Hill, Tyson, Owens, Ingram & Lynch
Nays: None
Chairman Lynch declared the motion carried.
(NOTE: THE COMMISSION DECLARED A FIVE MINUTE, BREAK AT 10.10 P.M. AND
RESUMED THE MEETING AT 10:15 P.M.)
I'A(:�F: SIX - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MISSION MEETING -- AUGUST 6, 1985 I.985-1792
V.
CONSIDER, PLATTING - #P--85--41 -- FINAL PLAT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, GLADE
CROSSING SHOPPING CEN I'ER., 0.845 ACRES, LOCATED SOUTH OF GLADE ROAD,
wt-ST r t l:IJ C;EI ` '_ TO NORT1i MAJN STREET, N 0 RTfI A €I) !3,D.?,.0":t . T'� AND
EAST AND ADJACENT' TO NORT'H(.HAT ADDIT'IOI�
Mr. Sam Beasley, Glade Crossing Joint. Venture, presented the request for final platting.
Chairman Lynch noted that in the event that driveway access for property proposed or
platting is to be by way of that portion of Lot 2 which fronts on North Main Street, ten
loot cur: returns on North Main Street will be required and must be contained within
the subject lot. This requirement will have to be met in connection with the building
permit, not the plat.
Mr. Ingram made a motion to recommend approval of Final .Plan #P-85--41.
Mr. Owens seconded the motion, and the Grote is as follows:
Ayes: Messrs. Ingram, Ovens, Hill, .Deith.loff, Tyson & Lynch
Naas: None
Chairman Lynch declared the notion carried.
VI.
PUBLIC BEARING #IZC--85--24 - REQUEST OF SHIRLEY AJiLENE HILL, FOR A
CHANGE OF ZONING ON TRACT IA3, EDWARD TAYLOR. SURVEY, A-1550, TOTALING
--.........._----_--_----------.............................................
5 ACRES OF LAND FROM R-1 TO C-2, LOCATED SOUTH OF GLADE .ROAD, WEsr
AND ADJACENT TO F( LLEIz-bVlSl-..R R__O AD, AND NORTH AND ADJACENT TO
CINNAMON RIDGE ADDITION
Chairmen Lynch opened the public hearing and explained the rules governing such
hearing.
Mr. Bob Kannedy, Keystone Properties, representing Shirley Arlene Hill, presented the
request for the zoning change. He stated that proposed S.H. 364 will take approximately
1 1/2 acres of ' lrs. Ililll.s property. He stated that when firs. Bill purchased the
property, she intended to build a home on the five acres; however, the proposed S.H. 360
has since changed her plans and she would like to sell the property..
Mr. Dei.thloff inquired if there was an actual use proposed.
Mr. Kannedv stated there was not.
Chairman Lynch asked if there were any additional proponents.
Mrs. Shirley Arlene Hill, owner, stated that her intentions are not to get more. money
from the highway def;a.rtme.nt for the right-of--way. She has no plans for the property
at this time, but wants to sell in order to buy land for a. home.
Chairman Lynch asked if there were any opponents.
Mr. Charles Jessup, 503 Rosemary, presented a petition of homeowners in opposition..
There were several homeowners who spoke in opposition to the request. One main
objections was that there were no specifics plans. Seventeen people in the audiernee
indicated their opposition by a show of hands.
PAGE SEVEN -• PLANING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - AUGUST 6, 1985 195-093 G
Chairman Lynch closed the public; hearing.
The Commissimi agreed that the requested change of zoning was not the highest and best
use of this property at this tins; further, they woUld prefer to see a plflnned
develnpment when the time carne.
Mr. Owens made a motion to recommend denial oflC5-2 .
N-1r. Oeithloff seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows-
Ayes: Messrs. Owens, Oeithloff, Tyson, Hill, Ingram & Lynch
Nays; hone
C.hairrnan Lynch declared the motion carried,
VIl.
ADJOURNMENT'
`.There being no additional business to discuss:, the meeting adjourned at 10:55 p.m.
;
CW1 4 r an j