The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985-09-17 1985- 110 AGENDA REGULAR .MEETING Planning & Zohhin; Commission 201 N. Ector Drive Euless, Texas September 17, 1985 7:00 pmi. - Pre-Cohnhnission Meeting 7:30 p.m, - Call to Order for Commission Consideration or Scheduled Items INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular !Fleeting Bated September 3, 1945 NEW BUSINESS 1, CONSIDER SITE PLANS - #P-85-38 & #P-85-48 A. Site Plan of Lots 63 - 124, Block 9, Villages of Bear Creek - First lhhstallinent, 6.684 acres of land, located eat of Fulter-Wiser Road, erect and adjacent to hear Creek Parkway, nortta of Harwood Road and south of Ash Lane. B. Site Plat; of Lots 186 - 231, Block 9, Villages of Bear Creek - First Installment, 6.484 acres of land, located east of Fuller-Wiser Road, west and adjacent to .hear Creels Parkway, and north and adjacent to Harwood Road. 11. CONSIDER PLATTING - #P-85-38 Final Plat and Engineering Platens of Lots 63 - '124, Block 9, 'Villages of Bear Creek w First Installment, 6.684 acres of land, located east of Fuller-Wiser Road, crest and adjacent to Bear Creek Parkway, north of Haa.rseood Road and south of Ash Lane, II1. CONSIDER PLATTING - #P-85-49 Final flat and Engineering Plans of Lois 186 - 231, Block 9, Villages cif Bear Creek - first Installment, 6.484 acres of land, located east of fuller-Miser Road, west and, adiacent to Bear Creek .Parkway north and adjacent to Harwood Road.. IV, PUBLIC HEARING #Z(,-85-27 Request of Federal Sign Connp3nr, for a change of zoning on Lot 4, Block D, J. P. Halford Addition, totaling 0,66 acres of land., from C-2 to C:-2 w/Special Use Permit for Increased I=lcight & Area of Sign, located at 109 W. Airport Freeway. 1J�35w111 V. PUBLIC IIEARING -#ZC--85-29 Request of N1r. Doug Boehke, for a change of zoning on Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Oaal;:svood Acres Estates, totaling 0.76 acres of land, from R-1 to I'D (Retail), located east and adjacent to N. Nlaein Street and north atnd adjacent to Asln Lane. VL PUBLIC HEARING -- #ZC:-85-30 Request of Smith flousing Corporation, for a change of zoning on Armor Glen Addition, totaling '15.081 acres of laud, from I'D to PD (Reyised Develoinsn3ent Plan) located north and adjacent to E. Midway Driye, south of Blessing Branch Creek, cat of North `'lain Street and syes€ of Fuller-Wiser Road. VIL REPORTS ?OPTING DISTRICT ABBREVIATIONS R®l single Family Detached Dwelling District P.-1A - Single Family Attached Dwelling District R-2 _ Two-Family Drivelling District R-3 _ Multi-Family Dwelling District, 12 Units to the Acre R-4 -- Multi-Family Dwelling District, 16 Units to the Acre R-5 - Multi-Family Dwelling District, 24 Units to the Acre C_l - Neighborhood Business W strict C--2 - Commu nity Business district L�l - Limited Industrial District I-1 - Light Industrial District 1-2 -- Heavy Industrial District CUD _ Community Unit Development PD -- Planned Development SP _ Specie is Use Permit 1995--112 REGUIL,AR MEETING Planning & honing Comniis!3icin September 1.7, 1985 CALL TO ORDER I'he regular meeting of the I'faiinirig & Zoning Con.rnission was called to order at 7:34 p,m., in the Council Chambers of Euless City Hall by Vice Chairman Jahn .Dcitl.1,off. MEMBERS &. STAFF PRESENT T IVIEMBER`i ABSENT John Deithloff, Vice Chairman John Lynch, Chairman Car. Tyson Ro`Jcrt M,..Millon Larry Ingram Jack: Hill Billy Owens Janes Knight, City Engineer Rod Tyler, Senior Planner Jim I IcK.anna, Project Engineer 1 .lean Anderson, Staff Secretary VYSITOPIS William I-L. Camp Ran Morris Dub Weatltcrby Stacy Smith Doug Beek Otha Denham Dale Turns I*,aorni Syochal` Mark Sheets Jesus Perri.-Guillermetz Dcnzil Goode Woody Hickman and other interested persons INVOCATION The invocation was given b-v Mr. Car: 'Dyson. I'lie minutes of fli. regular incc;ing dated SePticfnbcr 12, .1985, were approved as written. PAGE TWO - Planning Zoning Cornmission 'September 17, 1.985........................... 1985-113 CONSIDE SITE PLAN FOR - #P-85-38 :.5fTE PLAN OF LOT'S' 63 - 124. BLOCK- 9 .VI..Lt,A.—(jr�-S O BEAR CREEK - FIRST INSTAIJ:NJFNT_ 6,684 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED EAST OF FULLER- W I S r R -R 0 A D, .W E S T A N D _A D J A.0.E NT TO ;SEAR , 1, 1_K FARILNY A L(_)RT I QE 1-1 A Fz W't_)QJ. iA_ - ROAD AND SOUTLf QF AL 1_1 LAN E CONSIDER SITE PLAN. - #P-85-48 - SITE PLAN L 0"I'S ':86 - 2-1 11. BLOCK- �_). �?'lLj_,.AQES ................... . ....... Q BEAR CRFEK - FIRST'INSTALLMEN I1°, 15458 A(: .' S OF LAND, LOCATED EASTOF FL;LLER-NV';SER ROAD, WEST AND ADJACENT TO BEAR CREEK PARVv-AY. AND NOR-11.1 AND ADJAC.EN-L I? HARWOOD ROAD. Mr. Ron. Morris. representing MCR International, explained that this is the same site plan that was brought before the Commission about 18 months ago by Fox & Jacobs, At that time, Fox & Jacobs envisioned building the area themselves and they planned on building condominiums on two (2) lots with all the property held in comr.a.-on. He stated Fox & Jacobs had undergone some organizational chart es and had dropped th.cir devc1opmc.rits of this nature. They sold the property to MCR International who.. because of the uncertainty in the condominum inarket, was unable to obtain any financing as long as it was a condo-minium. Therefore, they were proposing a site 0 pl-an which provides lots for each unit where there previously had beeli only two (2) lots. III doing this, they have lost four (4) dwelling units; so there is actually less density proposed now than there was eighteen. (18) anon-IM ago. The major difference betwec.n the previously approved plan and this one is that now, when soimcone buys one of these single family detached homes or one of the townhouses, they actually are buyIng Ille land as wel as the unit. Othcr than that, there are no changes except that city staff had a number of other concerns due to the way the ordinatnce is configured. Some of the lots hacl to be widened, parking places added, and trash pickup chaiigedL He niet With the Council in May of this year to brief them on what they were doing, and they gave their blessing in essence to go back and put lots on there. He further stated that it has taken a long time, and thoug1h they may not feel totally comfortable with every aspect, they feel thit this is probably the best they can come up with in tr4!11100 to add lots in what was previously .I condominium type of development, Vice Chairman Deithloff asked Mr, Morris if he had received a copy of Mr. Rod Tyler's letter dated September 1.3, 1985. Mr. t'vl_orris stated that he had not. Mr. Dcilhloff stated tDat there were several variances noted on the letter and requested that Mr. Tyler elaborate on these va-Irlanccs, Mr. Tyler stated that the letter starts out by addressing the zero-lot line honks and the townhornIcs separatc-ly. f1c stated that the majority of the variances bein.- reclucsted, that differed from the previo-us site plan approved eighteen (18) months ago, were due to the in trod u ic)n of lot lives. He went over his letter to the. Commission in which lie discussed the pcuposcd building setbacks, building spacing, r.nasonry requiremcnts, lot area. lot width, floor are-is proposed, off-street parking and trash pickup., lie notcd that ffierc were certain £n.cons.£sic£zc3cs between the site ... ....... plan and plat such as in the minirnuni lot area, building cocroachmants ill the various eascr.crits covered by PC-Pctual maintcnancc agi-ecincrits and rainimum lot widths. Murrls stated that this was the same site plan as prey'Xclusly submitted with the i lie stated that he felt that excepnon of lot lines being -added.. INICR had improved on the site plan Fox & Jacobs had submitted. He asked if Mr. Hershel Lindley had notified staff of a change in the plat. l'AG.l? THREE w 1'iarrrri:rrg & zc)ning E etrimis ion - Septeirber 17, 1985 1985-1.14 ';��j'ir,, "Tyler stated ythat Mr. Lindley had not contacted staff or submitted, any revision to this plat or site plan, Mr. Tyson asked if the previously approved site plan containcd individual lot lines; were the condos to be sold without lane-' ownership" Mr. Tyler stated: that the previous site plan had no interior lot lines: that tl3cy were adding lot lines which. introduces ownership of the actual prol)crty with the :;ale of tl3e dwelling urfit. Mr. Tyson+ stated that he felt they were char Bing thr use _"rom condos with con;—non ownership to single ownership. l~iiro Hill asked how the homeowners association would be enforced. Mr. Morris stated that a hired professional urganization enforces it. Mr. Tyson stated that he feels the only things that have changed from 'he site plan eighteen (18) montixs ago are the lot litres, and he is not in facer of this site plan due to the number and type of variances. 'dice Chairman Dcitliloff asked Mr, Knight to make a statement in regards to the p sss' plc outcome of this aigenda item and how it reflects on agenda iteins 2 L 3. Mr, Knight stated that the developer is taking advantage of a provision in the zoning ordinance that allows site plane approval at the tirre of final platting for property zoned. Community 1, nit Dev .lopnient, This property is zoi3ed CUD for an h.-s type 'use, The developer, in this case, is presenting the Commission with a site plan in conjunction with submittal of the next two (?) items which are tlic final plats, �T'' c wL plan; have been prepared generally in compliance with the site plan that is now bcf'orc the Commission, If the site plan is not approved l y City Council (sit; plan approval is a Continuation of the zoning process of `-S hie h City Council has final authority), the plats would not be in compliance with the zoning, The 1"an.nio6 and Zoning Coirmission's authority with regards to plats is somewhat different from that of zoning. As he understood tlra: attorney` interpretation, both the T'l naling and honing Commission and City Council Tnust a.ppr tvc a plat in firmer for it to be approved; if one. or the other body denies the plat, it is a {.lead issue. 'ice Chairman Deithlotf stated that lie was not in favor of this site plan Because it w S if?nfitSiYi£;, and the to s lines, parking, trash pickup, etc., were not well explained or illustrated. Mr, Tyson made ai motion to deny the site plans for Lot 63 - 124 and Lots 186 - 231, Block 9 as prescnted. Mr. M<_Millon seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows, Aycs: Messrs. De.ithloff, Tyson, NlcMilloa, Ingram, Hill, Owens Nays: None Vies:. Chairman De.ithloff declared the motion carried. PAGE FOUR -- PltlD ?iW, & lorjiit� Commission-- September 17, 1985 1985-11.1 1 1. CONSIDER PLATTING -.#P-85-38 - FINAL PLAT AND Er1GUNE-_E ING .PLANS OF L.OTC, i l244 BLOCK � VILLAGES OF BE�`�R. CREEK. - FIRST INS i'AL:t::#��iENT. 6, 84 :��'R 1;:� O LANE' .�._:3. �...... .......... ..b '-- _.-..,,... .......L LOCATED l� E, ST fJl 1 LL,I-_Ffi.-1' S1 l� ROAD WEST .ANI� AF)I��CI l�T 'i'�)) I3.F.AR �I?EL1 - I','�R.K- WA°Y NORTH AND DJACEN"I' ".ro HARWOOD ROAD. 1r. Ron M orris, ret7resenting NTICR. Inte-rn.ati+anal, requested that this item be tabled aerie ing City C?bunc;il's action on the. site plan for #P-85-38. Mr. Cwe3is tnad.- a motion to tablO #I'-8;-38. M-r. Ingrain seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows: Aves: .Mcssrw. Deith off, Tyson, McMillon, Ingrain, Hill, Owens Nays;: Nore Vice Chairman Deithloff declared the motion carried.. CONSIDER PLATTING - #P-85-48 - FINAL PLAT AND ENGINEERING PLANS OF LOTS 186 - 231. BI-,i Cif �.b VILLAGE.5 F R. CREEK. - FIRST INSTALLNIENNL ACRES OF $. AND LOCATED EAST OF FU-L LEIS-�f'4'ISER ROAD, WEST AND r�l�l;i�'EN O BEAR CREEK PARK.- 'e�'A`Y, I�t ITT -a AND ADJACENT TO f"IA.KWOOD ROAD. Mr, Ron Morris, representing 11CR International, requested that this item be tabled riding City CouncWs action on the site plan for #P-85-48. Mr, Oweris inade a unction. to table #P-85-48, Mr. Ingrain seconded the motion, and the vote, is as follows: Ayes: Messrs. Deithloff, Tysc)n, �'fcMiilon, Ingram, Hill, O'Arens Nays: None 'tic;, Chairman Deithloff declared the motion carried. TV. PUBLIC: FEARING - #ZC-85-"7 - R UEST OF f-�EDERAIL SIGN COMPANY, r_T'_OR A SPECIFIC USE ��.F_t;��L f;�,T ON' LOT _4 ICI QO3 - L3 1. I'. at%�.I-:I=+�1R Q ADDITION. TOTALING 0.66 ,�t�:R►S. O _ � T�A..ND, FKC? O C:2 TO C, -2 'i/SPEr:;lFJC_ USE ''I>RA'#IT FOR INCREASED HEI(JI.IT AREA OF SIGN., LO—TED AT lt; i�lIZPOR I' FREEWAY, Vice. C:hairanan D lthloff op:e.ncid the pul ic. hearir: and eypla-mcd the rules of such hearing, Mr. Dub Weatherby, representing federal Sign Compat3s, cxplained that they wanted t > update and rr<ai:e °IYe sign lc-inks better witli the ne-,v Whataburge.r logo can tl:c main LD, sign. the sign dYould t?e the sate ltii-ht and face arch but with a f abri- face that will not blow out, PAGE MiT - Planning & ZoIjill- Commission - September 1.7, 1985 1-985-11.6 .. Septembers-.................. ................................... 'Vice Chairman Deithloff asked Mr. Weatherby if he had received a letter from Mr. Tyler dated September 111 1985 `%4r, Weatherby stated Ine had received the letter. Vic,., Chairman Deithloff asked for any additional proponcrit.s. There being none, !,e asked for opponents, There being no opponents, he closed the public hearing and opened discussion among the Commission members. Mr. Tyson asked Mr. Tyler if this sign would lie conforminx should this specific use permit be granted. Mr. Tyler stated that it would. Mr. Tyson inquired as to whether or not the face of the sign or poll-- could be changed in the future to the same height and area requested should this specific use permit be granted, Mr. Knight stated that the zoning goes with the property. Mr. McNlillon stated that lac had no problem with the upgrading and mi.-.wernizing of the sign, but he would like to see a stipulation so if the building is sold, then would have to enrae back for a specific use permit before changing, the sign face. There was discussion among the Commission as to whether or not the specific use permit could be granted to this particular sign face and this particular pole; and should either one be changed in the future, a new specific use permit would have to be applied for. Mr. {night stated that there is no iii-ne limit on zoning. t-dr. Owens stated that he wanted to stay with the ordinance. W Hill made a niotion to recommend denial of 4:ZC-85-27, as presented. Mr. Owens seconded the motion, and vote is as follows: Aves- Messrs. Hill, Ingram, Owens Nays- :Messrs. McMillon, Tyson Abstains: Mr. De.ithlorf Vice Chairman Deiffiloff declared the rnotion carried. V. PUBLIC HEATU`,`Q - r, C"-85-21? - TUOU'EST OF %IR. L)OUG BOETIKE, R)R. A ClIANGE OF _........... . ....... ------- . ......— ZON',ING (Ne. LOTS & RI_0C.K_J., OAK-WOOD A-JR ES ESTATES, TOTALING, C?,76 ACgES ','F- ............. ... LA.-ND, FRO114 R-1 TO PD iRETAIL), LOCATED EAST A>Np ADJACI.--NT TO N, MAIN STREL"f AND INTORTH. AND ADJACEN'T TO ASH LANE, V.icc Chairman Deitlhlo.ff opened. the public hcari-ng and expain-d the rtllcs of such hearing. PAGE SIX - PLANNING & ZONING CO-DAISSION - September I.:, 1945 .._-........... Mr> Stacy Smith, representing :Mr. 11roug Bochk, explained that a small neighborhood convenience center at this location would be in the public's interest, The property is locatcd on a coNver of a now rnajor arterial and this property is suitable; for a small neighbodmod convenience center of quality design & materials. He stated that they had worked with Mr. Tyler on an ingress lane to avoid :delaying traffic. He also explained that the building would be constructed of rnasonry and glass. Chairman Daithloff asked if they had a tertant scheduled foi- this building;, Mr. Smith: stated that they had no tenant scheduled, but were looking for cleaners, pizza place, sic., they want this to be a classy type building. l+r1r, Owens asked if he was aware that the previous owner's promised that this property remain single family? Nlr, Smith stated he was not aware of such an :green:tent. Mr. Tyson asked if the retail stores would front towards Main Street and also front towards the east, He. also stated that he was aware of the agreement with the previops owner to have these lots remain single family. Mr, Smith stated that some parking was in the rear; that the buildings would be narrow and would front only towards Main Street. Vicc Chairman Deithloff asked for any additional proponents, There being none, he asked for opponents, Mr. Sate Denham, 102 Walnut 'Way; Mr. Dale Turns, 1607 N. Main; Ms. Naomi. Svochalc, 1603 I Main; Mr. William H. Camp, 108 Ash Lane; Mr. Marl: Sheets, 109 E. Ash Lane; Mr. Jesus Perez-Gui.11erizicu, 181141 Chittam Chive; and Mr. Delizil Goode, 101 ?Ash bane, expressed concerns in rcga.rds to this zoning casQ They explained that they wartted it to remain single family residential to keep a family type atmosphere. They were afraid that it this is Zoned cominercial, the property to the south will be zoned com.-norcial shortly thereafter, and there is already an abundance of vacant c{immercial land oa N, Main Street. It was felt that this is already a congested corner; sk.hool childre.n would be in more danger if there is snore traffic; and property valucs would decrease, Concerns were also raised :about the traffic generated by a retail Center and that several school c.Iildren use this, crosswalk. MOTE; A horrwowncr presented the Ct nunission with a petition in opposltiFln to a,:ZC-85-29. Vice Chairman Deithlof'f asked for a shoo! of hands of those opl:med; there won :Et?w 15 hands raised, In rebuttal, Mr. Doug Bochk stated that the residents had a valid argutne.nt, 1?ut that 14, Main Street is an 80 form right-of-way, not a country lane anyinore. Ile stated that he was aware that there was alternate conlniercial space available:, but this Site dictates a good retail site. The reason lie canic In for i'`D was to let everyone kiIow what he was putting in, He z;tated that lie felt it would increase property value like; the area nround Highlaid .Park illa .c- ifa stated that it would be a quality ;project. PAGE SEVEN - PLANNING ek ZONING COMMISSION - September 1.7, 1985 1985-018 .....................! .............. ...................... -Ing scuss.ion f-or Commission Vice Clairma-n D-lithloff closed the public heii and opcned di members. Mr. Tn-,ram asked why the subject lon, had not beca built yet. Mr. Knight stated that could only be answered by the previous owner. Mr. Ingram asked if the previous owncr wan, required to build houses on. the lots as -a buffer betvfeen'the nuiAltifamily use and C.xisting Mr, Knight stated he was probably required to take out a limited nua�bcr of building permits and only took out the ones he was required to. Mr, Owens stated he felt that the conimitnient to the homeowners should be honored. Mr. Owens made a motion to recommend denim' of #Z -85-29 as presented. Mr. Ingrarij seconded the motion, and the vote is as follows. C, Ayes. N-lessrs. Deit.hllnfr, Tyson, M00illon, Tagrai-n, Hill, Owens Nays: Norte ViQc Chairman Deith To ff declared. the inotion carried. -air bread; - - -econvened at 9:0,0 NOTE: The Commission took a five � iute bre. at 8:55 P,m. and i VL PL,-_P,4LTC jjEARTN'G - -.1Z_EOtYEST OF SN41TTj 110USING CORP0R.AT11,'-).N, OR A._ CHANGE OF 7 ON ARBOR (31,EN ADDITION. TL)1-ALlNC ........ � 15.081 ACRES.-0-F LAND, FRO.,%1- PQ TO PQ ('Pj-,V1SED DEVELOPMENT PLAn L CATI�--D NORTT-1 AND ADJACEN,T TO E, \11DWAY DRIVE., SQU-T-1-1 OF BLESSING BRANCH CREEI . EAST OF NORT-1-1 NTAIN STPEET AND WEST OF FULLER.-4NJSER ROAD, Vice Chairnian Delthloff opened the publio hearing and explained tf-.te rules of such hearing, Mr. Woody Hi--l�raan, representing Smith Housing, e-xplained that Sa-,itfiL Housing wi,,hcs to be able to convey fee simple -title to each. individual homeowner rather than soli the applicable interest through condorniniums. I-le stated that they felt single family detached hotries, in this case patio arc more attractive to buyet-s and also carry with them a better resale value than condorninums, V �-e I . i- 0tari-n-an Deithloff aszked -.f he had rece'ved a letter from Nlr. Tyler dated September 12, 1985. Mr, I-lickman slated that Ile had. Vice Chairman Dcithloff asked if he had aii,., comrients to inak., regarding the items listed on "lie lcttcr. PAGE EIGHT PLANNING & ZONING C01-IMISSION September 17, 1985 1985-119 .................. ......... .................... Mr. flick-man stated tl-.zat fie felt they had Fulf"alled them. Mr, Tyson asked if they had received any feedback on the parking spaces. Mr. Hicknian stated that he had received no negative feedback concornin.- the parkiw . Mr. Tyson asked what the symbol of the square with a triangle in. side stood for. Mr. Wickman .-Ulaincd that was how the computer showed where the front entry way was. He also stated that two (2) units had been built that we.,it into the setbacks. fie lists stated that on one of the units- the problem could be corrected, but the other unit it was a bcdrooni. Fie stated that none of the remainder of the units would- be built into the setback. Mr. TvIer stated that t1he nnxclianical devices such as the AC units would also note. to be moved as they are on the adjacent property in some cases. Mr. Hickman stated that the air conditioners would be movod onto the properly they belonged to. Mr. Tyson -asked who would be keeping up the grounds. 101r. Hickman stated that there would be three groups keeping up the grounds, 1) homeowners association, 2) condominiurn association, and 3) single family reside:t" maintaining their own lawns. Vice Chairman Deithloff asked for any additional proponents. There being none:, he -asked for opponents. There being no opponents, he closed the public hearing and opened discussion among Commission members. Mr. Tyson madc a motion to recommend approval for #W-85-30 subject to the letter f r c.nm Graham & Associates, signicd by Say Childs, dated S'erternber 11, 1985; those items listed on the letter being pin.Qed on the site plan pr,,,)r to being heard by itV Council; that the symbol of a square with a triangle inside designati.ng the front entryway being placed on the legend; and Lots 69 and 76 being allowed to encroach ;a p o n, the twenty-five Coot (25') setback as constructer ;end. that no other lots shall protrude, into the setbact". Mr. Ingram seconded the motion, and the vote. Is as fefflows: Ayes: Messrs. Deithloff, Tyson, -i'14-c-Millon, Ingram, Hill Nays: Mr. 0-w-lns Vicc, Chairr-11an Deithloff dc,-Iarcd the niofii:m carr;cd. VIL UPDATE ON CQNSL�T LTANT SEI_FfTj�, N"Ar. Rod Tyler, Senior Plazincr, told the Cornmisslon. that the Consultant selc'•tion Committee had submitted two (^,) choice- to City Council and Council had scl,,cted to begin firial nCgotiafions with Code Techncilogy' It was hoped that the update of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances for the City of Fuless would begin soon. PAGE NINE - PLANNING G & ZONING CCI Y1 Y11SS1ON Septe-mber 17, 1985 11485.120 APA CONFERENCE Mr. Rod Tyler, Senior Plannert requested that in,j Commission rncrnblers intere5tcd in atu,nding. the APA Confcrence contact hira as soon as posy<hie to enroll. .LLCTi;� QF OFFICERS 'rice Chairman Deithloff ask ed for a rnotion to dect new officers. Mr. Owens unade a mation to elect new officers when the b:cw Plannijrg and coning Conuni lion member is appointed. by City Council. Mr. Tyson secrndod the motion and the vote is as follows: Ayes. Messrs. Owens, Tyson, McMillon, Hill Nays: Messrs. Ingram, Deithl.off V:,-,c Chairman Deithloff declared the motion carried. Fill. ADJOURNMENT There being no additional business to discuss, the meetin6 adjourned at 9:37 p,m, tom£ �-• l� Ir ,,��I ,�'° .,.--�^^"��