The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986-10-07 1986-107 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING Euless Planning & Zoning Commission 201 N. Eetor Drive Etxl.ess, Texas October 7, 1986 7:00 p.m. - Pre-Commission Meeting 7:30 p.m. - Call to Order for Commission Consideration of Scheduled Items PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -- Mr. John Deithloff INVOCATION - Mr. Larry Ingram APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting Dated September 16, 1.986 OLD BUSINESS I. PUBLIC HEARING - r'ZC--86-15 Request for a change of zoning on Tracts 1C, 1.C2, 1D1, 1E1 and IEIA of the John Groves Stirvey, Abstract 559 from its present zoning of C-2 and CUD R-4 (16 u;a) to PD -- Single Family Detached (w/reduced setbacks & lot sizes). NEW BUSINESS II. CONSIDER PLATTING ?P-86-24 Lot 4, Block E, International Regional. Industrial Complex, located south of S.H. 1.0 on. the west side of Westpark. Way. III. CONSIDER PLATTING - ##P-86-26 Repl.at of Tot B1-R, Block 1., F:til.esa Industrial Park, located south of S.H. 10 on the west side of Stanley, soutix of S.H. 10. IV. REPORTS Discussion of proposed Zoning Ordinance. 1986--108 REGULAR KRUING Plaxming A Zoning Commission October 7, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning k Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Euless City hall by Chairman Larry :Ingram. MIMERS & STAFF PRESEW MEKBERS ABSENT Larry Ingram John Deithl.otf Jack Hill Ken Balsinger Billy Owens Carl Tvson Tom Engle, Jr. James knight:, City Engineer Rod Tyler, Senior Planner Valerie Keelen, Staff Secretary VISITORS Charles .lvsey Sari Wyse Richard Bramblett Don Reichert Dennis Maylial.l. Keith Wallace and other interested citizens PIKE OF ALLEGIAWIE The pledge of allegiance was led by ?fir. Jack Hill-. INVOCATION The invocation was given by 'fir. Larry Ingram. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the regular Meeting dated September 16, 1986, were approved as written with the change in the table Niunber of the proposed Zoning Ordinance from 5.2 to 5. 1. 1986-1.€l9 PLANNING & WN:ING COW"SION OCTOBER 7 1986, PAGE TWO Secretary's Note: Because of the anticipated length. of the first item on the agenda, Chairman Ingram stated that the Commission would start with the new business first and save Item No. I on the agenda for Last. 11. CONSIDER PLAWING #P-86--24 - LOT 4. BLOCK E, IN' ERNATIONAL REGIONAL INDUSTRIAI> C)HPLEX, LOCATED SOUTH OF S.H. 10 ON THE WKST SIDE OF WESTPARK WAY Mr. Don Reichert was present representing Mayhall/Tanner Companies. He explained that they would he building an office/war.ehouse for Dominos Pizza and that the office section would be used as a communications center for Dominos. Mr. Hill made a motion to recommend approval of 1',P--86-24 as presented. `fr. dalsinger seconded the motion and the vote was as follows; .Ayes; Messer:. Hill, Balsinger, Owens, Ingram, ;angle & Tyson Nays; None Chairman Ingram declared the motion carried. 1I1. CONSIDER P1WffING - #P-86-26 - REPLAT OF LOT B1-R., BLOM 1, EULESS INDUS- TRIAL.. PARK, LOCATED SOUM OF S.H. 10 ON THE WEST SIDE OF STANLEY, SOITM OF S.H. 10 Mr. Charles Josey represented this request on behalf of Franklin Loflin, owner. He explained that this property had never been properly platted. He further explained that the property is currently under contract to be sold to `I.R.I.V s, Inc. , and that it is their intention to build a distribution center for electric motors. Mr. Engle made a motion to approve #P-86_26 as presented. Mr. Ba'.singer seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Ayes: Messers. Engle, Balsinger, Owens, Hill, Ingram & Tyson Nays; bone Chairman Ingram declared the motion carried. 1986-110 PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION OCTOBER 7 19$6 PAGE THttO PUBLIC HEARING - #ZC-86-15 ° RMTFST FOR A CHANGE OF ZO+tIM ON TRACTS 1C, 1C2, 1D1, 1E1 AND 1ElA OF THE JOHN GROVES SURVEY, ABSTRACT 553 FROM ITS PRESI NT ZONING OF C--Z AND CUD R-4 (1-6 'U/A) TO PD m SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (WREDUCED SETBACKS & LOT SIZES) Chairman Tngram explained that this item had been tabled at the :Last Planning & Zoning meeting. He teen explained the rules governing a public hearing and then reopened the public hearing. Mr. Keith Wallace, Washington/Wallace, Inc. , Hurst, Texas, represented this request. He explained that they had revised the plan since the last P & Z meeting. He feat that they had addressed each area of concern. He pointed out *-hat the mini-warehouses had been totally deleted from this site plan. Mr. Wallace then explained that the front yard setbacks were changed from 15 feet to 20 feet on 45% of the lots and the remainder being the standard 2-7) feet, still .leaving the staggering effect as previously proposed. He. further stated it would take care of any potential parking problems the Commissioner's had pointed out. in the first submittal. He noted that the :rear yards had been changed from 10 feet to the standard 15 feet, coin- ciding with the Zoning Ordinance. He continued to explain that the side yards were one of the few areas where they could not deviate from the previous plan, stating they were still requesting a five foot side yard set-back; however, on flee street sidde setbacks theyy were going with the standard 15 foot setback. On the issue of lot area, Mr. Wallace explained that they were actually proposing 5,4€30 square foot lots as opposed to the 5,000 square foot lots shown on the current site plan. The minimum Lot width with this rev-i.sed site plan is to be 54 feet, changed from the 50 feet requested two weeks ago, and the minimum lot depth of 100 feet changed from 90 feet, making a total of 54 x 100. On the issue of maximum lot coverage, he explained that they had charged it to the standard 40%, and the minimum masonry requirement coincided with the single family ordinance of 80% on the first floor front elevation. Mr. Wallace explained that as :far as access, two points of intersection had been aligned with Prestwick & Warwick. He explained that Needles Street had been brought through the subdivision. After some discussion between the Commissioners and Mr. Wallace, it was determined that the drainage easement and possible overflow problem had been taken care of to everyone`s satisfaction. Some discussion took place between the Commissioners and Mr. Wallace. as to the swing entry garages previously proposed. Mr. Wallace stated that lie could. not confirm that 25% of these lots would have the swing entry garages as proposed at the previous Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. 'inhere being no further questions for Mr. Wallace, Chairman Ingram asked for any additional proponents. 1.986-111 PLANNING & ZONM COMMISSION OCTOBER 7 1986 PAGE FOUR `'Ir. Sam Wyse, General homes, Dallas, Texas, explained that the houses proposed were exactly 43 feet, 11 inches wide with a depth of 69 to 65 feet, making better utilization of the land.. He explained that in the beginning General Homes had anticipated putting some swing entry garages In the subdivision if the 1.5 foot setback had been granted; however, with the 20 foot and 25 foot setback they saw no reason to have the swing entry garages. He explained that if this zoning request was approved they anticipated commencing construction within 3 months and opening model homes by May 1987. There being coo further proponents, Chairman Ingram asked for any oppo- nents. There being none, Chairman Ingram closed the public hearing. Air. Tyson stated, that he liked the reprised site plan, but still had definite problems with the side yard dimensions. He stated that he also had problems with the front yard setbacks if they were not proposing swing entry garages. Mr. Engle stated that he had no problems with the revised site plan. Mr. . Tngram stated he- was impressed with the refinements that had been made to this submittal but did not like the side yard setbacks. Mr. Owens made a motion to recommend approval. of i}LC°86-15 as presented. 'fir. Engle seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Ayes: Messers. Owens, Engle, Balsinger, Ingram Nays: Messers. Tyson & Hill Chairman Ingram declared the motion carried. IV. REPORTS Mr. Tyl=er po:i.nted out that Code Technology would be present at the next regularly scheduled meeting, and they will have some of the revisions from the last. meeting. He explained that if the 'Commissioners could get the Last half of the ordinance approved at the next meeting it could be ready to be presented to the City Council at their regularly scheduled meeting of November 11, 1986. There being nothing further to report, the meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m, C ha i rra4i _--