The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1990-01-02 AGENDA Planning & Zoning Conission Requ.Lar Meeting January 2, 1990 7:15 - Pre-Coo-nission Meeting , :30 - C�11 to Order for CommLssion Cons-derat ion of Scheduled t e3r> PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - George 7,,ahn INilOCATION - ?Lily Owen s APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meet ing Dated I)e :E'311be r 19, 1`:89 I. PUBLIC HEARING - Z.C. #90-01. Request of Brooks .Bij._ ,,3errs, .€.3"l 4.. , for a change of zoning oi, Lot� 1P. -hru 4R, and Lois 37R t hra 52R, Block 9, of the Bell Ranch `terrace Addition frorii it' s present . o—n nci of `.R--1.-i`-' (S,,nC:.1e ^aE:121-y Attached Dwellings) to a Planned Development for two (2; Single FaM . %ttachel iani.ts imind. ..1 SiF<c�� i yuttily �ei_:ach0 1:1- _s. Th e property is generally located in the Bell Ranh Terrace Add }.ion a-Long Nita 1,a.r..e, Crowe am-3 Kyne-tte Jri'ves. RFGII7�AR t�fEE:'PINtx Planning & Zoning Coundssion January 2, 1990 CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning & Zorning Ceo.mr scion was call :d to c)rder at. 7.31' � -[t, in :he C..ouficil "hi.n ber_ o.. (?u].;--tss ,:ity Hall by Chairman :Larry Ingram. NiP,E4BFJ?,5 & STAYF PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT John De.i.thloff Ken Ealsinger Larry Ingrw(i {ear's_ Tyson George Zahn j'ack- Hill B?_may Owe,Is ;amen hP.1. ht, City ilgl. tec3' Pori. Ty_er, Senior Planner }racked, Staff Sec.-letary VISITORS Joe Campbe!1 Barbara P(:-.'.k Wendi Rose camdice. Ca.rwdll PLEDGE OF AIJZGIANCE The pledge of allegiance was led by Mr. Georgct Zai:rn. INVOCATION The invocation wa. c;J.ve!z by Mrs 13.flAy OwEm:s. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The m-Mutes of the --eaul'ar meeting dated Pecerr)er 19, 1980, were. appr:_)ved a - wr ten. Page Two, Planning & Zoning Commission 14eet-ing, Janixar.y 2, 1.990 I. PUBLIC HEARING - #ZC-90-0 I-REQUEST OF BROOKS BUIIDERS, INC. , FOR A CIIANGE OF ?A)N'1.'NG ON 1AYNS IR THRIJ 4R, AM) -1"TS 37R THRU 52R., BLOCK 9, GF THR BRIJ, RANO-1 TERRACE ADDITION FROM IT'S PRESENT ZONING OF R-1-A (SINGLE FANILY ATTACHED DWFLLINGS) TO A PLAMFD DI?' RIA)PMENT PDR TWO (2) SINGLE FAMILY AT'rACHED UNITS AND 11 SINGLE FANILY DETACHED UNITS. THE PROPERTY IS GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE BELL RANCH TFJ-�,PACE ADDITION ALONG NITA LANE, CROWE AND KYNETTE, DRIVES. Chairman exp.lained the rules. governing a Public hearing and then opened the publ�Lc Inear-ing. Mr. Joe Canpbell, Brooks Builde-rs, Inc. , preseifted the requ:tst stating that the current' zoni.nq of the properitty was for a1uplexes b{ft Brooks Builders felt that: it would be beneficial to the existing neighborhood to reduce the density of the lots 1:-.uild more single family detac.hi-d product line. Over the last six months they have had more demand for single family detached housing and while ri--_�viewing their }.o1 inven-11-ory t-h-ey dec-i-ded to revise these lots Cr f Single favtily detached housing. Brooks Builders has talked with residents of the area a -1 -il t(> be in favor %.11 n, they see of this prop:)sal . He stated Hat this pr;:sposal w -I '- increase property va l• ueq in the area. In answer to a <pj.estion 'Dy Mr. '11'yson regard=ing the of f--street parking, Mr. Cam-pbe-11, explained there was an error on the development plan and Brooks L' ,:x 4"ders P :-nned c.,n -u q u si'71e by b ilding t.wo (2) car _arages or., eacl nit to pro side parking with rear entry. Co.,amission asked abouft the square footage of the houses, 41-.o which Mr. Campbell stated the unit- sizes would range from 1,500 to 2,'_7010 squ�-Ire feet in living area. He expla.ined that this size home was -in demand.. Some reSj.Q"en4[_-,s have expressed a desire to havrz-! larger, newer homes but want. to stay iin t lie vicinity. Mr. Tysoi-.L e:n-pressed concern regarding the corner lots on Kynette, Drive where 1.5' building line is proposed instead of 25' !>uilaing .line. He stated t1haL he was conc.�.,rnedl about the sight visibd.Lity at these corners and the corner loll--_s could bbe cl_rt in a sqq;Uare with a 25' build—ing ii.ne and be in compliance with th-i-z-t and inan;_e. He stated this change would enhance the property and th.e s-e.11-ing value.. Mr. Canpbell explained that these were unusually deep Lots and they felt that- the 15' I-Xii.l.ding _11..-n,-s would not obs-truct visibility to traffic and at thie same time nrovidle the homeowner w-i 'Uh femcing up to the 15' froill the street. He advi.sed that- these lots could be changed back -to the required 25' building line and to also change the pads if that would be acceptable to il-he ccn--MPISSICM. Page Three Planni!jq Zoning omission Neetipg, January 2 1994 Chairman Ingrwrl asked if there were any othjer proponents. There be ding n-ne, '3e a.si%ed if there were any opponents. There were none. Chiairma.n ingralr. closed th.e pulil:i.c hearing and asked fcr d.i.sc:3ss..on arr3ong Commission members. `-h ere was general. discussion among the Commission ryiel-mb?rs as to concerns about re.'vising the ;plans ::0 the -changes p.r.;or ti-, before the City Coanc L.... Mr. Cap-npbell assured the CofiiEillssion that the changes would be made and revised u.J.a 3s sl,-Ih- 3.i.tted to the :tiff w� h-- a week. Mr. Tyson made a. motion to rec:o33333rend approval. of ##'ZIC-90--0 i subject to the typical. layout on the site plan being revised to reflect. a two r2i car garage, to b�: locat.e..-, withil, the b>_:yld.ing area,y that lots shown or.z the plans as t.rct.: 3R1.. .',:iRI, and 4111 1 are to have 21, side yards and t1hat-I the plant be corrected to reflect these changes prior to Presentation at the Cites Council, ?fir. Dei th lof ,.e.�Jr3ded the 3tot.'nn, and the vote was a : fo low <. Ayes: Messrs. Inc rar3, Owen.- , Tyson, Hill, Zahn and Leit.1ilc7ff Nays: talc=ne Cha:i.rm3;n T ng--a31: declared. the motion carried. II. REPORTS Chairr3an :Ingram asked if there were any reports to be discussed. There being none Cha-irman lnL'r%Lm stated that he. had one lte!}} lie wished to discuss ss wit-1, the e"i3r33331iss loners. Chairman Ingram st.at. d that he was not reeal. c:omlzfort.able 3rli.th the way the t•ecent e'.ei.t ion of officers went, in particular ar the o-'L i ice o'�� Chairman. He stated that he had glven the matter a Int of thoi.rgh.t. and without. the ..Lear majority of support of tide entire corxmi ssion, he felt that he could not ccmfortably serge in the posit ?on of Chairman. Mr. lrlc:ram stat::r3 that t'-}i. ; W;:is 'Cmet.hi.nc- he needed to. co for h i.nself personally. HE, stated he felt that this was the proper thing lcr _._ii} to do at this t me ¢'e_.>r'e:use of his feel roles about the election and personal. things .n his life. Mr. .t:ng.ram further explained that he had .held the office of Chairman for the Past three and ofie-hualf years and he ff:lt: that the position required. a. I-)-!.t more co,;ffmitnent and -ti_mie to .be U"one properly He has felt for about the Last sip: months or }Fore, that because CYO' Lime -and personal sItuati..ons, he had not been able to devote Vhe time .._. the office that he should have. Pie Four, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting, January 1990 Therefore, at this time he declared that he was resigning as Chairman and would resumes a normal glace on the Commission. Mr. Ingram then turned the gave! over to the Vice Chairman and expressed his personal opinion that an election should be scheduled to Fill the vacancy. Mr. Owens stated that he did not have a problem with Mr. Ingram's resignation on the grounds of personal reasons. But as for the election, -it was legal and already in the hooks and over with. Mr. Hill stated that it Mr. Ingram was resigning on the grounds of the election, then be could not accept the resignation as stated. But if he was resigning on the grounds of personal reasons, Mier it wound be acceptable. Al_ the Lather Commissioners :agreed. Mr. Deit?doff felt that Mr. ingrain had devoted as 21ucTt time to the Commission as any other member. He did not understand how much more a Chairman could o than was already being don" Ue stated that he felt like we had one of the best staffs in the area. He commended the staff members present on doing a super job and making the Chairman's job a lot easier. All the Commissioners were in agreement that the election ran the way it wa,'.'+' meant to be run. Mr. Ingram restated his reasons for .resigning to being personal in nature, but also expressed that this was a multi--sided thing on his P�- ar He explained that. he did not want to resign .*roil the Commission because he enjoys being a part of this organization. The office of Chairman for many reasons, some of them personal, is something that he :needs to be relieved of at this time. si:_r, Ctiairfiiari Zahn asked if there was a motion, Mr. Owens made a motion to (11 ) accept the 'Chairman's request that we, as a relieve h.inz of the dut -es as Chairman, accept his resignation as Chairman, (2) a plague be presentee at the next City Council meeting on behalf of the t_'4:mnA i si.n expressing the CoPCBiti.ssion's sentiments of a job we'll done, above and beyond the hull of duty anf: that. our Vic x: Chairman attend d to ur_:sent. the plaque and answer any questions that might be asked. Mr. Hill secon ded the niot io-n, and the vote is as follows- Ayes: Messrs. Owens, Hill, I ngram and Tyson Nays: Messrs. Zahn and Deithloff Vice Chairman Zahn declared the motion carried. :lace Chairman Zahn_ declared that the election for a new Chairman will l,f: scheduled on the next agenda. Pa Five, Plannip2 & Zonij22 Comission Meeting, January 2, 1990 ADJOURNM M ng nothing furthier to ctiscuss, the me:--ting adjamrned at 3:2.1. .ANN �we -- ----------------- --------- 7----- Chaira"ry lL