The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1990-07-03 AGENDA July 3, 1.9913 Planning & Zoning Commission City of Euless 201 North Ector Euless, Texas 76039 'J:(10 - Pre-Coftm iLssion Meeting '7:30 -- Cali to Order for 'CoTrotiss.i on Co:z> i derat4 oin o 3t_heduled Items INVOCATION PLEDGE OF aALMGIANCE I. REPLAT - #P-90-05 A request oA lkii: Har.r.'s Campany for a replat of Lets 1A _ 20A, Block A, and Lots 5A - 9A, Block 'B, SuJ sh.inE:` ME-�ad ; s Addition; generally 3_ccate:l on the we-s,", side of Baze Road and south of Bs.,ex Place. 1I:. REPLAT -- #P-90-07 I eF>1 tt of lbot 2, Tract - ;,i7t E,, t`r. ct rip of Yee J.F. I✓a4for Addition, and 0.391 acres t•f unplatted !an'- into of =2R, 'Tract. D, t::f Elle J.P. Raiford Audit-dot, coltai.n .P,'.` 1.3S acres of land; gene V C?cated bet-of.-m S,11. 183 and S.I H. edS' of Aver—. I I T. #P-90-08 - FINAL PLAT - AL-KO SOUTEWEST ADDITION Re<jue:_t of Bedfr�rd &. Associates, Inc. , f;_7r final plat for Lot 1, Block .A, '.Pil--Ko Sni-out nwest: AdC'fiti-on., consisting of 4.-1'-.41 clues; 'en---`:Lr_ ll y located 1400 feet; south c}f Ci)_c3.:.e Fi'oi:'d on the east sides of S.R', 121. IV. CONS:IDKRATTON OF SITE PLAN FOR AL-KO SOUTHWES`.f'. ADDITION Cons-ider approval of ltthlel site elan for AA.--Ko Southwest est At�%ition. V. PUBL-1c k9F.AFtM - #Z,C-90-03 Request of .D-kirabhe Specialties, Inc. , for 3. ch.angii (-,f zoning or. not 27E-R, Block C, Some-rset Place Addition, from :t t^ Present 7C;n Ti"tt1 Cif -i { E'i:�l�ik Or.s3 JCS Bt„^.i.I e8s 11 s�.T'ict J I_.t> `.-2 I CrJii:.i"1LIn At'V B?:siness Distr_ct) ; general.iy located at 100 Z. Wk 1way Drive. VI. SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST - #ZC-913--03 Rs:uuest- of Durable Spec a_it3.�sz , Inc. , for a Specific Use Permit for '.ndoor corfli ert::.ial %:4iT?'(i£.�E?F1er t- general i.y 1 ct catd. at 100 E. ;t'.idway Drive. V11. REPORTS 41 Ilii3`t'}?S JULY 3, 1990 Planning & Zoning Commission City of Rules s 201 North Ector Drive Euless, Texas CALL W ORDER ` 'he regti.l.ar :££tet- ].nq of i_h' Planning & Zoning CoiIIICissi.on was $o order at 7:30 P.m. , in the Charibers f3 : the Municipal wilding by acting rh':lr~£lan Larry Ingra.°n. MFRRF.RS & S'T'AFF PRESENT NKRBFRS ABSEW .Larry Ingram George Zahn Billy Owens Jack Hill Ken Halsinaer Jobn cr a;.g, Dire3c or + Development Rod Tyler, Asst. Director of Dev_11opment J ir:3 McKanna, SL.af'f' Engineer Valerie Kee.l.en, Decor-dig a?C'.'re ary VISITORS Diek Ca ve.rr the Haz r.is Greg McCall Charles Little Maggie :ih.illi.rgford Wavne Vice 'troy Manuel Francisco F; enzalida ani other int.-.rested C1,1zens PLED OF A11..GIANCE The ple-dge of allec;iance was led by ?fir. Larry l ngrairt. INVOCATION The invocation Was givi r. I--,y Mr. Billy Owens. APPROVAL OF KIND TF.S The minutes of the regula-rly scheduled ineeiin'� of v''1le,e JY 1990, 'vr[?? e approved is written. PIANN IAAG & '/,L3NINCA CONKY,SSION, JULY 3, 1990, PAGE TWO I. REQUEST OF I F HARRIS CCAPAINY FOR A REPLAT OF LOTS 1A - 20A, BLOCK A, AND LOTS 5A - 9A, BLOCK B, SUNSHINE MEADOWS ADDITION; GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NF?.ST SIDI? OF BAZE ROAD AND SOUTH OF ESSEX PLACE Acting Chairman 1-1gra}l3 e-plained the rules governing a pub-L i.c hearing and then opened the hearing. Zits Harris, Tire Barris Company, explained that the, purpose of this repl_at wa ; to rf-m-'r:fi<;-t3r£, the lots in this addi.trr�:t so chat t1hey would conform to single family detached housing requirements. The property is currently zoned and platted for single family attached lots. Approval of this replat would. reduce 4! hc-., nff}Loer of lot., from 50 to 25, and <3oi3'ble the sizo of the l.ot;S. Mr. Parris states} that thr;�_-L--' 11ot.7 da not o'onform to the minimum, lot size; i.-it, sho-uld !,-Ile Pl nninq & Zonina C:t:))1,3n1.ss i.C)n a Prove i_-his request, he would apply to the ;r£')ning B(::�£rd of Adjustment for a variance on lots 6R, "17R, >_._}d gR, Block B. Act nn Chwarf'tan 1-n-grain called }::)C' any proponents. There being none, Chairman irlarx-ii calied for any opponents. `.i'here being nofle, Cbairfflan In--rani closed the public haaring a.nd C)3;ened di.�cussion be'"Eween the Commissioners- -no Mr. Balsinc.er made a mct:i(. E to appr£:)ve '#P-�?C-�)5, a0 1 re�ef3�ed, wit the under>:t and ifzg t -0-- Mr. 9arr?S will request a variance cn 1::°:t s 6R, 7R, and 9R, Block B, Sunshine Mleadows Addition. Mr. Owens seconded tn.e moti_:on and the vota_. was Lis follows. Ayes, Messers. Ba.'..S:E-nger, <w:.ns, Ty.san & Ingram Nays: None Chairman Ing?-am declared the motion Carried. II_ #P--90-£77 - REPLA`L' OF LOT 2, TRACT D; LOT 6, TRACT F), OF THE J.P. RALFORD ADDITION, AND 0.39 ACRES OF FINPLATTED LAID INTO LOT 2R, TRACT F), OF THE J.P. HALFORID ADDITION, CONTAINING 1.35 ACRES OF LAND; C-,ENERATJ.Y LOCATED F3EI VF?EN S.11. 183 AND S.H. 10, EAST OF BYERS AYEd+3't R Mr. John Roper, for Mcf)onald'.s Corporation, stated this repl.at was to ..ork.,::)l i dat.e the McDonald's property into o-le lot, He e%plained that the plats with the owners siignature_z: were being forwarded to the C."ty at this time, and should be delivered" by Monday, Jtaly 9, 1990, at the `atest. Mr. Baisinger_ made a rwoti_on to appro-ve i$'P-90-07 , as presented, object to st:aff receiv.ir:g the signed plats pr.iol to City Council'-_ ,onside- rcttl{ f} O t=x? item. Planning & Zoni.n C mmissjona, Jai 3 19913 Pao Thjv Mr. Tyson seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Ayes: Messer:_. Balsinger, Tyson, Owens, and Ingram Nays: None Chairman Ingram declared the nation carried. III. #P-90-0$ - FINAL PLAT REQUEST OF BEDFORD & ASSOCIATES, INC. , FOR. LOT 1, BLOCK .A, AL-KO SOUTHWEST AI3I3=€:`TION, CONSISTING OF 4.791 ACRES OF LAND; GENERALLY IOC ATEI3 1400 FEET SOUTH OF GLADE ROAD ON THE EAST SIDE OF S.H. 221 Mr. Dick Calvert, ..al.vert ,; Company Architects, informed the Com- mis si.on that tiie preliminary plat had been approved by the City Council on june. 26, 1990I The finals "?at. request is the 4, )l acres fronting on S.H. 121. The remainder of prcperty is not proposed for development at this time, Fir. Calvert explained that the access easements requested by the Planning & Zoning Commission on the preliminary plat had beer. pre_. aided. Additionally, "Letters of Waiver" from the adjaae•nt property owners indicating their agreement to locate the driveway radius returns in front t of their property have been executed. The City has received tl;:.£- agreement's from the property owners an the north and the "Letter of Waiver" from property ;uwnsrs on the south were forthcoming, Mr. Owens expressed. concern to the use of asphalt in place of concrete for the access easements, but determined that the gross section of the design requires that it be cable to support a fully loaded fire `.:ruck; if done properly, asphalt would accomplish this. Mr. Tyson made a notion to approve #P-90-08, as presented, for Lot 1, Block A, Al.-•Ko Southwest Addition, €•'€r. Balsinger se.:.onded the motion and the vote was as follows: Ages: Messer s. Tyson, Balsinger & ingrani Nays: Messers. Owens Chairman Ingram declared the motion carried. IV. CUNSIDERATIOUN OF SIR`€? PI AN FOR AL-KO SOUTHWEST ADDITION Mr. Dick 'Calvert, Calvert 6: Company Architects, presented the site plan for AI.--K,_3 Southwest, as required in all l:! Zoning Districts. Mr. Calvert informed the commission that the City Council merti.oned that the property to the north carries a zoning; of CUD for multi-family; so a screening fence would be required between the two differing zoning PlanD%5 & Zonin Commission, July 34 1990, Page Four categories. ?fir. Calvert requested he C`.au-iiiission defer the . e i-ir ment of the screening fence until residential development occurs on the adjacent property. Al-Ko outhwesf has no problem erevoin< a screening fence once this property develops, (for their liability reasons as well as City requirements) ; however, they believe it is an unnecessary expense at this time. Mr. Tyson made _3 motion to approve the site plan for F1 -Ko Southwest, as presented, with t?-}i:e stipulation that the required screening "fence be erected at the time = residential development occurs adjacent to this property. Mr. Owcen,> sei_'._'nded the motion and the vote was as follows-. Eyes. ':ti?esser's. Ty`-.on, O:?1i:'ns, Balsinger & Ingrari Nays: None Chairman Ingram declared the motion carried. V. IZC- 90--03 - REQUEST OF DURABLE SPECIALTIES, INC., FOR A CBANGE OF ZUN.t.NG ON LOT 27-E-R, BLACK C, SQKERS]Kr PLAC'S PODITION, FRC)$ IT'S PRESENT ZONING OF t'-1 (WFIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT) TO C-2 (C(A4- MUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT): GENERALLY LC)(A` ED AT 100 E. MIDWAY DRIVE Chairman ing.ram explained 'thee rules governing a p-Liblir; hearing and then opened the public hearing. Mr. Charles Little, for Durable Specialists, lnc , ftati':^.`e+d the r 'nun s- icn for t>xi:! o L r i n = _ae Comm"is-sion. that Durable Specal.ie.:ies, Inc. , is requesting a change of 7.,i:tying from is-„ to (>2. He further advised that the next: item on the agenda is their request for a. Specific Use Permit on this same property, if approved, for an indoor soccer facility. her. Little stated he would answer any questions they may have, Chairman Ingram called for any additional proponents. `i'E'iere being i°tone, Mairma'n ingrain called fi_?r any opponents. Some discussion occared regarding the Specific Use Permit site plan_, after which, Chairman Ingram closed the public hearing. Mr. Owen- made a :notion to approve Mr. Balsinger seconded the motion and tl-i+:e vote was as follows Ayes: Me se.rs. Owens, Balsinger, `.I°yson & ingrsr•.i Nays: None Chairman Ingram declared the motion carried. Plann%2 & goning Commission, July 3,_1990, Pale Five VT. SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST BY DIMABLE SPECIALISTS, INC., PDR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR INDOOR CUMMERCI.AL AMUSEMENT; GENERALLY LOCATKD AT 100 E. MIDWAY DIVE Mr. Little, for Durable Specialist, Inc. . explained this re i,est is for an indoor soccer facility which will be rented to leagues to e:. nduc t indoor games and tournaments. Mr. :little stated that at he- visi.tUd a similar facility in Addison and observed three teams playing and only three cars in the parking lot. Most of the tra.f..f.ic would be parents dropping off and picking up the players. The i:uil.di.:zg will be an attractive and h.arrre:nious addition to the area; a seven foot 17 ) screening fence will be provided between the building and the residential ;neighborhood. to the east. Ample light ing would be provided at a height lower than the fence to avoid inter- ference with the neighborhood. Chairman Ingram called for additional proponents. €'here being none, Chairman Ingram called for any opponents. Mr. `t'roy Manuel, 413 Rambling Lane (Lot. 1, Block C), stated he was not opposed to the use or the zoning, but wanted the City to be aware of problems with the storm drainage in this area. He was concerned that. with another building ing going in, the drainage problem will worsen; his property has flooded numerous times from this drainage problem. He also scanted to know the hours of operation, if an ri,asement would be provided to keep patrons from standing on cars in this parking list and coming over his fence and into his pawl, and hose much traffic was anticipated. Ms. Maggie Schill.;.ngforu, 202 Rambling Lane (Lot 6, Block , stated she was not opposed to the zoning or this type of recreational facil-- i.t.y. Her concerns were with the parking tut being on this cast: side of the building. She preferred to see the lay-out "flipped," so the parking lot would be on the west side of the building, not adjacent to the residents. Additionally, she .believed the wilding would be a noise buffer, more ae sthetically :leasing, and would maintain a consistency with the other businesses in this area ( _.e. , parking in front of building). Mr. Wayne Vice, 409 Rambling Lane, and Mr. Mike Ballard, 405 RaFttiing Lane, both expressed concern with the parking facility o . the Fast side of the building and requested the Commission consider `(flipping" the b-uilding and parking arrangement on the site plan prior to ap- proval. :sir. Francisco Fuenzalida, 201 Primrose, expressed concern with pos- sible liquor sales, the company's longevity, etc. , stating he needed to know more abort the company. There were no other opponents to be heard. qtr. Little returnee;, to the podium to address s the items of concern. Planning & Zoning Comission,_�Ta�.l. 3,_ 1990, Pqge Six Mr. Little explained that the site plan had beer. designed this wa.y the - -1, in m ul r : r + [n'-1 be bors t E,- mind. He felt �Ihey wo d r e_ie be parking to the east of the bui.J.1ding opposed to the building backing up �o thei".- fence, but f,.:)resees no problen with ch-angirAg the arrangement if that is what would make the residents happy. Mr. Little. stated that the drainage pr;:)Iblem Mr. Manuel is exp •rl-encing should be eliminated entirely once the screening fe=nce is e-rected. Mr. Little stated that he did not know the 1.1c'urs of operati. n the facilit y would keEip; hiowever, stated it would not be a 2.4-houx opera- ti.c,n-, Ee also stated no liquor wouLd be allowed oi, 'Uhe preinises. Pe said he didn't- know criuc-h ali-out his clients company personally, but understands that leagues rent the facillfty for pract-1-ce, games, and tournaments, and he believes -the ages of participants. are prinrLarily youth. to hLgh- school age. Th.c. riajority of the -onurtission favored an foot wall. Mr. stated that he would not recoimnend an ei;pt f,-x)t wall because it ILS I�kely to be out of scale wit-h the resirkintal use; however, is wiLling to erect an e4it foot -wall 11-3 rlease the Comml�lssion and the neiah- be-rs. Mr. Little stated that he ant.-ii_ipates no prob"Lem with "fl ir Jing" the F'te- Pla- so that t•c buU,ling backs ap to th(.- _i.`_,-;dent:i al nei -or- hoo-,A, -but prrs essiUrally wou-Id not re-CUPOICT'd it. Chiairmiari Ingra-m advised the Con-o-rtAss-:....)n and audience that Mr. I,itt'.- had addressed each iss,,ie the opponents presented, and if '_-here were no :3,�, -.+in �Ad.: _ xial .-;,oricerns of OPP0'SItJJJ_Dn, hE-1 would close the hearing The-re be-inc. crone, Chairman Ingram cl.-osed the public hearing and opened discussion between. tri(i, Conmu-ssioners. Mr. Ba-isinger was adament about the nega.tivE-- effects of ha-ving a. 22' i,.,ali wit hLn 15' of reside:ntial property. Be stated this would be. far more detr�inental than nav_Tla par III the fence. a k.ing behi- _Ln response to a Question from the Coirutiss-ion, Mr, McKanna explained that th;-- storm. drainage sys-�I-em, is propexly sized but termiriates into -a, n - open field on the Tiorth side of East Midway Drive. Wher, the property to the north devolqps the drainage system will con-Linue and problem Is because em,pty into Branch. Therefore, the Qurl -Tit I - the water rushes frorci t-he open -field to the in.let and back:_ up. Fir. McKanni re-..-I--.erated that the problem would be corrected once the property on the north develops. ri to a question from tlbi� Comassic.n. About redesigning and i -sponse - flip nq" the site p, an, Mr. Litt'Le stated '-hat his client hoped to open the facility in October, 1990, and expressed coinccrn abcut being delayed. Plannin & Zoning omission Jul 3 1.990 Page Seven Mr. Tyler. explained that the applicant was requesting a waiver to some of the submittal requirements which the commission ;..oald recon111"end if they felt they were warranted for this use. The C:k73T3miss:.::n had concern with egress of the facility. `here is no median cut to make left turns and one has not been proposed. `t°s'hen leaving the `acility traffic wil.l go right to the first street and make a "u-Turn" to get back to main Street. The Commission believes that it should be the responsibility of the developer toper to make a median cut to the left. Chairman ing am suggested tabling the Specific Use Permit Request at this time,, let ;fir. Little redesign the site :Plan: in accordance with the issues and concerns expressed, and resubmit in two weeks, and still be able to reach City Council. at the nacre time as previously anticipated. Mr. Owens was interested in the residents thoughts o:i the redesign after the opposing issues had been discussed. Mr. Balsinger ;£tad_ a notion to approve t`•'ie'- request for a Specific Use Permit en Lot 27E-R, Block r°, of the Somerset Place Addition, as presented subject ect to specific lighting detail, and a screening wal.l of right feet which would extend from the southeast corner 261 westerly. The motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Owens stated be could not vote on is motion -tint. l lie knew the opporu_nts feelings after everything that had been dism sea this evening, Chairman Ingram .reiterated to the audience that if the site plan were "flipped" there would be 15' between the building and the scree.ning fence, an area that would be difficult to police, acid hard to Keep trash and debris out of. Ch- ihcta.n ingram asked the people in the audience to raises their hands if they were in favor of moving the building to the eastern part of the property and the parking to the western portion of the property. Everyone raised there h=inds. Mr. Owens made a :notion to table t ds request until the site plan was drawn showing the building on the eastern portion of the property and the parking to the wi?:zt, and that -..t he submitted to 'City staff in appropriate time for their review prior to the next Planning S Zoning commission meeting. Planning & Zonipq CbmmAssion, Jull 3 loo. pm e ±}_qht . Tyson seconded the motion and the vote was as follows; Ayes: Mess s. Owens, Tyson & ingt : \ Nays: Messes. Balsinger \ Chairvan Ingram de clared the motion carried. ¥II. ARTS & ADJOURNMENT There being nothing to report, the meeting adjourned at 10:10 p.m. . � } $9ting air as ingrarfl K:min tes\7-a-90.p&z