Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-04-07 PLNOUW CCMNLSSRK City of M 2. Buless, Tom 7W3 AprU '7t 1992 DMSCUSUCK CW POS ZOWM aWnGAM 7:30 - Cali. to Order 3M Billy rym APROML OF KOMM - Regina ropetimj of orb, .17, 1.992, is RMLAT - Rk�T�t of ever De lent ��ny for a replat of a portico Of Block >�, in the IntexnatIOMI/Reuel Irdustr a 1 axo.ex into Block, A, Lots 3R ard 4R, T te,-m o 1 doom, lr?L vial. Pawkway.d a CONSIOM A FRUVIUM JO """ Comsider remmk---�ng a resolution to du-u-qe the Zming Ordimme that odd ref-p re lardscaoinq be irc],u(W In all futum dewa op- rnsent of two (2) cr core acres �a EM W. Z 92-01 A PJMCUMCK RECONVAMM AN AMENUM 347, n a-IFIM AS TW HKESS ZOKDJG aWDOMM BY ACCOG IAUXOWDG, SaMEKM AND OLnMM S ego the Euless wing ordinance currently has only too (3) zoning districts that require landscaping; and, WDOW, landscaping is an irftegral part in aiding the stabilization of the env:i-r cart's ecological balar-�ce r and', MOMS, lard-&--apinq also ounces the quality of life; and, �g in order tai safeguard and enhance property value, to preseinre the eecxaomic base attract to the City by such factors, as well as preserving and protecting the unique identity and environment of the City. NOW, MWMFUM, BE IT FW3CLVED BY 1W HAREM AND ZWM OMUSUM (F TM SB=CK l , we hereby reammwnd the City Obuncil approve and adopt the ordinance attadied hereto and made a part hereof, u4uch would require l,anct-capireq on all. new developTkents other than one, or two-family dwell-u-q district usc--s, SECTICK 2 1W, a sign coMz of this resolution sNal.l be delivered to the City Coil, and shall. constitute the report and reomwndati on of the Planning and Zoning ng cmnission. ADUFMO this day of April, 1992. t � r c°iai rtt#a k ►ckets\l.andsc-ap o re s MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 7, 1992 The Pre-Commission meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairman Jack Hill at 6:00 p.m. , in the Conference Room of the Euless MLMiciPal Building. MEMBERS & STAFF PRESENT MENERS A SENT Mack Hill Carl Tyson John Deithloff George Zahn Letty Lynn Maloney Ronald Young Billy Owens John Craig, Director~ of Development Rod Tyler, Assistant Director of Development Paul Kruckemeyer, City Engineer Susan Weaver, Assistant City Engineer Linda Lux, Staff Secretary VISITOR Mr. Gary Whitten, Rayburn Tucker & Company Mr. Ernest Hedgcoth, Consulting Engineer Mr. Bob Hall, Bob Hall & Associates DISCUSSION AMENDMENT The Commissioners postponed their discussion of the possible Zoning Ordinance amendments until the next meeting. PLANNING AM ZONING CQW SSION COKSIQEFMIQN Of SCHEDULED ITEMS - CQ NCIL CHWE The Planning and Zoning Commission continued their meeting in the Council Chambers at 7:30 p.m. , for the consideration of scheduled items. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Hill . AT The invocation was given by Commissioner Owens. PLANNING AND ZONING COMH15 1 APRIL A.... 9..92.._-_PAGE TWO RPROYAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the March 17, 1992, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting were approved as written. 1. CONSIDER REPLAT - #P-92--01 - REQUEST OF WEAVER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF BLOCK A, INTERNATIORAL/REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX INTO BLOCK Al LOTS 3R AND 4R. Mr. Ernest Hedgcoth, 5701-C !Midway Road, Fort forth, Texas, was present repre- senting Weaver Development Company. Mr. Hedgcoth advised the Commissioners that they are proposing to replat a portion of the property into two lots. He stated they will meet the recommendations stated in Mr. Tyler's letter of April 2, 1992, before they go to City Council . Commissioner Young moved to approve Replat No. P-92-01 , International/Regional Industrial Complex, subject to compliance with Mr. Rod Tyler's letter of April 2, 1992, regarding construction plans and profiles for the storm sewer system meeting the requirements of the City Engineer before going to City Council. Commissioner Deithloff seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Ayes; Commissioners Young, Deithloff, Owens, Maloney and Hill Nays: None Chairman Hill declared the motion carried. II. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. P&Z 92-01 TO RECOMMEND AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINWE Mr. Tyler, Assistant Director of Development, briefed the Commissioners on the proposed landscape ordinance. He stated that the proposed ordinance had been drafted per the discussions at previous meetings and is now before the Commis- sioners. Commissioner Maloney Moved to approve Resolution No. P&Z 92-01 recommending an amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 347, by adding Landscaping, Screening and Outdoor Storage Requirements. Commissioner Maloney requested that the motion include the DRC (Development Review Committee) comments of April 5, 1942, Commissioner Owens seconded the motion and asked that this item go to the City Council for discussion at their Pre-Council meeting. The vote was as follows: Ayes: Commissioners Maloney, Owens, Hill, Young and Deithloff Nays: None Chairman Hill declared the motion carried. PLANNING N IS IONk APRIL 7Y 1992 9 PAGE THREE III. There were no reports for discussion. There being no further discussion, Chairman Hill adjourned the meeting at 7:44 p.m. Chaitma$ Jack Hill \dw4\minutes\04-07-92.p&z Development Review O=ni.ttee Comments on Proposed IAndscape ordinance April 6, 1992 Members Pent: Paul. Kruckemeyer, City Ergineer Rod Tyler, Assistant Director of Development Cary Gerland, Risk/Safety Lager Randy Byers, Director of Public Works Mike Logan, Fire Marshal Gary McKamie, Assistant Police Chief The following are comwzrt.s generated by the Development Review Ckxmttee (DRC) at their 04/06/92 review of the proposed landscape ordinance: 1. Section 10-103(5)(c) Recommend eliminating the statmrent flHowever, no parking space shall be located further than 50' from a pe..rrneable land scaped island, peninsula or median". ERC COMMENT: The DRC felt that this requirement placed to many design restrictions on proposed developments. The general requirement of "r:ore or less evenly distributed throughout such parking areas" seems adequate. 2. Section 10-103(10) Recomieand changing the Sub-Title and inserting the following sentence at the beginning of the paragraph: "C 110*4 t d: Landscaping shall not be located or placed to obstruct any emergency equipment such as fire hydrants, stand pipes, etc. , nor shall landscaping be places in a manner to obstruct emergency ingress/egress to building. Landscaping shall not obstruct OW CU4�,. This will prohibit the placement of landscaping in a ranner that would be detrimental to public safety and providing emergency services. 3. Section 10-103(12)(a) Rec om,)end changing to read as follows: '"lemmral Of irq: The City may at anytime rercve or require the land to remove any landscaping located within any right--of-way or public ease- ment for the purpose: of public safety, ass to utilities and to perform any public improvements within said right-of-way or public easement.» DRC CCMMEM: The €RC wanted to make sure the City maintains the authority to remove any landscaping to service its utilities or safety reasons and not be placed at the property owner°s r.ercy to remove it upon request. often tires utility repairs and other public services are perfor-r d under emergency conditions and waiting for a property owner to remove landscaping at his convenience is not an option. 4. Recomend changing Section 10-103(1 ) by repZacia xl: °_ �lm provided for vehicular and pedestrian use" to °'.lance provided in vehicular and pedestrian use.ee DRC MWWr; Clean-up, regulate the plat and design of the landscaping rather than the placv-wnt and design of the lighting system. This ordinance does not rebate lighting system. 5. ReOM.Mend wing Section 10-104(1)(c): From "utility ease tsll to B°utility and eimrge ,y ass pmts." DRC C OWWr: This change will require fire lanes to be shown on landscape plans, an well as utility ea-saxnents. 6. Reed dbangi.ng Section 10-106(2) by removing the sew paragraph. DRC CC*4ff > A regulation governing the parking of certain vehicles is- covered by Section 14-112(c) of the Euless Code of Ordinances. \dw4\r t\its.drr-