HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-10-04 AGENDA
PLANNEN"C', AND ZONING COMMISSION
City O1' Elul+ss
Council Charutw.�-, - Building "B'
201 North 1-""Cto r 11rive
l!"Ad ss., faxes, 76039
I.Mober 44 IM
5,31E Nleetino ;Downistalr� Ca-sr£tf,rtm.ce WN3)m Bul im. 'A")
Call uo Order (('o: ne'l (.Tiamb<-,m -- Buildin'- "B"'
I'LEDGl 1:11< AL;[EC8-1ANCE Cs.3£uniasioner B ldw;'n
1NYOC'<< TIO - Cliair£ ian Youat�
APPROVAL OF N- 11NUTES Regular meefing of September 6 , 994
1. PUBLIC HENRING - ZONING CASE #94-15
Req€ ,zess of Rick. llorn for Carter & Burgges.s, Inc-: fats• a change of zoning on,
u-).6ff :�ams known gas Tracts 3, 4 ,a£ati � of<lie Rays Shelton Subdivision, E cmn ifs
prmkma r.E?nino of PD €:Platar:ed Dc-vOopr ent fix- SUngle--Family Dep.aclilM
11w 11i£. s, s. lafl kAs) t€ l�D (Pl'amiecl levee opnie t for S-ng£�:-�1=amily Detach d.
DA elfi gs, with revised site p11111, `1 hl.s pro ,rty l;ene..ral1"V located €it ffio north
sip'; of 1?am. 111a.mc*d Road and east of Wiser Road
H. 1IAMPACT 1' 1.s l(;.AP1':I'.r' L IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY C-01MMITTEE)
Tb, ,% Me£l MJ W111 sE3e h, �£ ��medJi �l� � �f thePlanning and
, _ ... ,..
lSTl+D '1`H IS 29TIl DAY TIED S:l?,P1.1',%-I.B.ER 1994, AT l�,W
Individual Posting Notice,
Plan in allprsst Vt t5 a fatftr,knee bnt)and pcso a r£Juires at �-se m.eeking rAeaxe
tx)n!1,-;3 Our offict?iii W7} Peaao 3abie" t'd he- 7iin'1i5f.to 3C i:Ct ynur n,',.ds.
71'OBER 4, IM
0_i'thf :1�I i�} 3 and Zonin Corfumssioiri was called, to m'der by C7hai.rrnatr Ronald
Youag at 6,00 P-M., in the downstairs Adrninistrab-on B;ildiiig Confa::reno�. Room. Seven rne. bc-rs of the
4
I'llanning and Zori,-n g Cofnmiss€o-n were .rri attendance.
PLANNINGAND ZONING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION OFSCH.E :L 1) 1
Chai:rman Ronald Ymmg open"I ft P?anni ig and Zoning Commission meeting at 7:1,Y) P.M,, for One
corxsiderat.irrrr. of scheAlulcd it;anus. Sever, niembers of (fie Piarrn€ng and Zbning Commission were .pria�,;nt,
consdaiti€ g a quoi-.r€. Vie agenda for€:h.is nieent)g had been properhs posted in a ccoroance with applicable law,
The gr€est� in attendance were welcomed.
Chainna n Ronald Youi-iW None
Biliv Owens
Robert
Haney Bri gh.t
Geg ;*e. Zahn
Carl T art
Joy Bald- i.n
Randy Byers, Director of P�ubhc Works & Developme nt
Paul Kruckeineyer, City Engineer
RmI Tyler, City Planner
Andrea Baxter, Assistant City Engi er
Barbara Chambers, S€,)ervi.w5r
Ueda Lux, Staff Secretary
VISITORS FIRLSENT:
Dick SEroai, President Pulte. Homes
Brad "Dever, Carters ur,,�,ess, Inc
Rick Hom, Carter & Burgess
Blaze. Tibbe€.s
:<, 0-)unc l.mafi Gem Walker
RANNING A.ND ZON4.N PAGE TWO
OCT0131' , 1994
OF A.LLEGIANITCE AND INVOCATION:
I`I€e Pledge of Allegi.a€Fce was given and the invocation was given by Chl a rn.xl
youn��
M,-
rA.I w11-lJS
('.hair€ tan Ronald Yo nIg ask-e'.d the Cornrniss a:€.ors for Corrections €r additions to the minute-, of tN,-
September 6� 1%)4, ger€ :r`al mWet-i.ng of the Planning mid Lning
The motor, to approve ,he minows of the &p€emN!r 6, 1994, Man€ing di Zoning Com,ydmion meeting, was
rude: by t omynissioner 0,,,�ens and seconded by Commissioner Zahn. The motion carried,
REGULAR AGENDA:
I'T'EM I. PUBLIC 1✓ILSARM5 :aa;f) l'NG CASE #9 4-45
Request of Rick Hom for (',a er & Burgess, Inc, for a change of vming on 22, acres T;n€wl-I
as "T'rd as 3, 4 and 5 of the a-,,, 'Belton Subdivision, frm.,n its preserYt ro€-ing,, of PD iPlamwd
ev0op€Went for S;.ngle-I:xml Deached Dwelfings, small lots) to pi-) (Plati€"i Des•elalmnent for
single-l"an€By Ma�:he!d Dwel inns with revised site plan), This property erty Is generally located on
the imi-li -,ideof East Hamocy1 Koski and west of F�ufler Wiser Road.
liar€dy .I, h ers Director of I=3uhiic Works and I3�.veloprr€eut.. im-m I mLd this item by stating that the .applia a at
Was re.q>msung an amen€ l ne nt to the'. ca,�rrent Plan€r€ed De��el €�eet, c pp�-ovo by City �:'ef€mcil on o vetntvr 9,
1993, in order to relocate tT€e street ali nnse€ ton the rest side of Harwml. Roads, The new, ropo al places the
street within the €griddle of the weAern leg of the development mid is proposed to be bounded on either:side
by landscaped open spee. I'lie new ali nrne€:r results in a re: luction of I I k-its. 'No other a,sNct of the
prevr;€a€sEy at:Ypmved planned development has beer€ changed, "Pbe -Develop- ent Review C;`ommatee. revie\mr..d
this prs pe lair€el Ia3r rele l their commeiits to the applicant, The ap plicant has made al the: t�;E;h-nical changes
s ec feed by the DRC letrer of Septornber ?1, l£9,4. Considering n:sidering the surrounding 1wid use, the Development
Review Committee, is in. supporl. of this request,
Chairman Young expWr?erl the rules govemin;- the openi ng and closing of a Mhflgc,Dearing, He then opens the
Public IIearir€g for Zoning 'ase for 94--1 5 and w1ad that the appl4,znt or come forward to make
their presentation.,
PLANNING AND ZONING CONINITISSIONER MEEUNG - PAGE THREE
OCTOBER 4, 19-94
Bract Meyer, Cartcr & aggesw, Inc— represented the applicarnt, 'Pulte Howie-, in their request, her.
that,:Mr, Ri ck Horn €ith garter&BFirgoss and Mr, Dick Strong i w th:Pulte were pr st ant to answer airy, questions.
He stated �ffiat when r. this case} was previously heard it included a road running in a configuration t-hat Soul
include Mr. 'f'ibbets property, At that time Pula: xas negofiafing with MrI, `Pibbets to purchase. his propel - and
incorporate. it into the Planned .Develops esnt, <S:ir€ce that lime an agreenxent was not reached between pulte, and
Mr, 'I'ibbets, Land sales have been going well. for Puttc and they wish. to pr,w_eeti. with the third phase of this
tlevelopn?ent. Mfr, Meyer stated this propotsaf causes t.l ern to kx€se eleven lots and reduces the density. By doing
this Pulte proposes runnhi� the road throapgt the nmi.ciclle of their property on the west side, This will Al€w a
nicelly la-ndscape:€f area at the entrance c°cnning off Harwood Road. Mr, Meyer addressed l thae iss e of the height
of the fc twe that �urrounds the project. Staff recom.rr€eaclecl are 8` ft- hilgh fence and M.r. Meyer, proposed a 6'
ft, fanee to allow resi€ferits the pleasure of being able to Icx)k o gt t:hei.< windows and seeing l We sky instead of
just fi,:rtce, fie f wls, this will be desirable for the homeowners,
Ms. Suu,-n HAL presiclertt of the Harwfx f ark`f ownhotnes Association, aske for an explanation of'the prgject,
She had q€aesuotis reoarrfinn the fence and the date of s�?oinni.no, Linda Kirbo, `f°rea�.surer of the 'I'€���nhorne
Association sated she would prefer the 9` ft., high fence. `f`he 'f'o—,vnh mes are in. the middle of this prcfject
at1jac:ent to Mr. Tihhets protxrty, Ms, Kirl)wanted reassurance that the private drive into the T o'wnho.n_ies vvt uld
not ha.�,e addaioral traffic. frorn the Mr. k1'feyer explained they plan to lease the access for the
7s.R rrl:cRrres arRCl would leave the road €n place.
�Chair<nan Young called for any persons wishing to sivak An opposition. to die development.
Nil% Blaze Tibbets, 20- p, hlarwcRS_Rtl, Stated his property was the €ne, being discussed and has beer,discussed for
appro, irnat:ely one years. Tibbets asked for clari.€i.catin on what city staff ;gas re�.�nn.enclaa He asftacl
Mr, T ter if the t,:omnr.issioner6 vverc considering tl?e sarr#.e proix)sal that was considered a. year atW;oe €f so
plat€;irFg and Zoning (7.onrnaissiOn mid City Council turned this down, anti. approved the plan siul�ject to the road
g ing through Mfr., Tibbets property.
MT, "f'yler stated that what the Cotincil apprs_Rvvd was basically this plan €gin the original lilan and the applicant
had propo%A an altem. ate atligntnent., ` `he City Council specifically struck the atltermtV alignment off the
p cRl ar:l,
Ht-, ¢irrt.her stated that. the applicant now has made. a request and any ordinance. aan ndinent ha, to he
heard by P&Z arch City- Cot.iicil., The I` e elopment:li eview C.on,,.mittee has maale a recsxnnien ati€n to the P&Z
that :states bi 1he Septen-iher 13, 1934, letter that "the applicant has made all technical charges �pccif ed by the
DRC letter of Septe€rther 21, 1994. Considering,,, the starrfxin€fiat; Tared use, th-V.DR :; is i-n support of.this re€Itlest,
Mr. Tibbets stated he had sold the entire 15 acres tart yltMrs ago. At that time the 12,7 acres (Pi0WS. request')
i as zoncd. as �'Itdti- a€rily as well as the 2.485 anres that Mr, Tibbets currently owns, Mfr. Tibbets started: that
the intent:was for the road to go through the niiddle of his propcR,rty. He slatted sirs e thers, the property had been
aR n x�?t t tl ts.R � rthfe f rr ii.y. Mr, Tibbets pr€ jxrty .is zoned :' 'u1.ti-Fwnily, Mfr, Tibbets asked for direction on
lac{w to develop his grope since he would have to rwi a street through the middle of it. Mr, Tyler stag that.
spat{4t and se°wer are available at Flarwood :1�wd, lie further €nf€rrmM .W `fibbers in other to tlta€rtlop
l:is M.Ulti..pa€oily zoned parcel of land he wa iAd be required to file an application. for a Land .plan, The
OCTOBER 4, 19,94
ap l_eatior€ anki proposed plans would then go through the pr�xess, of be-ing referrfc!d to the �,eloprrre€�t Review
CE� nir€fttee for recon ��e€lotion to the Mannino and Zit€�€lw Commission. Mr. ` ibbets stated e way in a vor
of the Land Plan as it wa-s or.:-i.rraily presented:, Mr, Tibbets stateel that he has considered putfi-ng xis twcnt -six
tMits on tlr.is pr€rlse.rty however, thm, still re-mains the problem of the drive access and road.
Mr, Horn stated during the original Zoning Case it hecafne apparent +that €gigot atio s were i..ot materializing, so
PlAte brought in ail alter€rate plan to present to City Council, Since staff all the DRC had not bad time to
re vvv ar€d.. a.f pro-';e the alternate. alignment, the request was approved by City C;Ouncil. with the road going
stralght through. Mr, Horn sta.wd that C"ity Council told ahem to try ar;sd wont_out a deal with Mr. Tibbets and
if they could not Come tr-) a.n agreement bring the elan back through the process and let stale review it and if all
t&zhilical. aspects dare worked out then he 1�.Jt Like Council wotild approve the proposal, This was the s<€nie plan
as presented at this plann:i.ng, and Zer,i a meeting. It %-,as irrrlx)rt:a nt for the property to be zoned as s4nol:e family
pmjwrty f-)rior to Closing on. the property, The cost of single family zoned property is less than pro ter that is
zoned multi-family. AU sanitary seers are pr€pos to scrOce to tbe no t:h.
Dick Strom, lyres talent, Pulte 1'lorr e,, Inc,, stated that he and Mr, Til ba& had tried negotiating €n the Tibbet's
property lit€.t beeat€st: of cost lkifte was unable to purchase the prolx.ry lie stated that Mr. Tibbets price for
his larrel wxs, a fair price for multi-family land bzA they are not interested.i€r. purchasing. the preperq, at a multi-
farni.ly rate in order to build si€rgle far€tily liomes�
>'Co€pnissioner Owens asked for Clarification err a staternent made by Dick Stron, regarding City Council
earect.i€pan.. l-le stated, that he was present at tJze Cortrrcil rrreet.irrg where the pr€l .)sal wwa denied- -for the road,
C.,omrrrissioner Owens stated that he rmist have misunderstood Mr, Strom's statement regarding council
al r"o° lug the Proposal if he could work- out a €"I with Mr, `l'ihhets. Commissioner Owe; .is stated that the
.rrir€utes reflect the Council taking the po,&I iorr to €ferry it. He stated, that at no time did- the (fisetrssion come tip
at Council telling Mr, Stroni to negotiate with Mr, Tibbets, Mr., StrortF stated that he was asked to cornea forward.
at the City Council Meeting to the M'anor's plat.brn-r' 171c further• stated that all of the council huddled
arses ntf and council slate "if there was a problem and the differences cannot lie resolved, please.0.)nie} bash and
we, €nderstarref what has happened W Strer€r, stated that coi'incil e- lained the thole situation to hire 'l�xb.
eenomically and financially, He statex) drat council told him they f,woWd approve this request". A reqeest by
Commissioner (hvens to read the minutes of the Cowicil ralee in.p �,;as denied by Chainnan 4'emng,
Chair:razarr Ysrwrg cleseed €:lie Ftublip:. Hearing for dise.trssion ammig the Commissioners.
Commissioner Tyso€r asked Nlr. Strom if he had any o1qi etimis to moving the street closer (hventy five f�et ;0
the east) to the grope r lime and dedicate, the street as part of the right..of-way. This would solve Mr, `Filrhets
problem of access to the road and allow Mr Straus to go ahead with devclopme-A€, Cm-nr:€nssio rer 'l'yson also
se rge tee a median a�.;a:.e.ss to My, Tibbet.� property in the event. multi family was develop d. Mr, Strom womb,
trans, to look-at the i;.nP Ct thi.s Aould have financially, economically and from an engineering stud point. if thfis
does not affect thee, ecor€om.ic:illy and ffi.raf16ally, then there would be no objection in considering This
recom- endatitrn, C€nunissioner TysA m also had sonic questions regarding the gx&--n spasms in the caper€ area at
the, entrance having enough room for chil.€lmm to flay.
PLANNING AND ZONING CON-UNIISSION. "ER MEETING - PA.(-'N'E FIVE
OCTOBER 4, J"4
Mr, Rick 14orn, Girter tai mess, stated that he felt d€.e:re. would he sortie proble€ia with this <e-u ommeeli ation.
There is multi—family uses along that road 'way and €s allow direct front . e alom,, the eraire frontage would
greatly¢ r€d ice € e €- ark-elabilitY or aesthetics, of the landsmWd enter dr ve. lib: stated d that. it would. IY4 €iff cult
J
to achieve a curb cut or raaedi.an.access at this point, Mr, Horn believed it would he a problem for€ulti fwnily
cases to integrate with single rarnil y mars, Mr. Wye., may f l misrepresented when they
thought they were getting a ;green belt. area and then in the tF ature there may lip; dri.�ewa�s or additional traffic
from the ras._hi fzrm.i y area, Commisr;if.zer Tyson stated technically, these residents are in a unique s—imatlon from
the start because they are already aware that they are purchasing homes in an area thaatt has townhoines and
apartments. Mr. Strom was adamant in regards to not. wanting this to happen to anyone who purchases a Pulte
Horne,
Commissioner M€;Mill€?i.; stated lie had a problem with the conflgura€€on as prose€€te and felt as though
t;a3arin issis�i er`l" sari's roc+era.- iendation had merit. Co€rmissiotier Baldwin a gored, with Co€uni:ssioners Tyson
and McMil.lo€ ,
Commissioner Owens stated he was not aware of aiay side hair aagrcernent that City Council had made with l ltet
He stated lie was against the proposed plan acid .recoir mended going hack to the original plan,
116-ir, Wyer spoke to the after looking at the plans, he felt like Coxnmi.ssi€ner Tys€n's
sa ;estion had .%-)me merit and could be worked gait, k1r, Meyer tlio€ght an access stria could lie worked €ut
acv€th her. Tibbets for aa, f€at€are road &Orn his Praopa;rty. Mr, Meyer recommnended not inovinkw the alignment over
toward Mr, Tibliets property,-.
haul Kr€ackl-fnever, (;ity Erwineer, informed e the Coo- missi€hers on waater and sewer service. on Harwm'i. Mfr.
Kriicke meyer stated there waas water but lice was uncertain aab:ul sewer at this location. However, he. stated he
woulol check. the map, ` here, is sewer available at the townhouse, tract at the so€ath€past corner of the Ti:hhet.s
property but s-uspectcd that it might hi; tm) shallow, There is €ne existing €n the south side of Harwood,
however, the snap did not give any depth or further information.
f.'oa imissi€nt'r 0-wens- askxd that the Minutes reflocq that the question was asked regaTdilng at what point would
the applicant le. required to present an engineering plan on, the water and sewer. Mr, KrUcke-me er stated this
was a 7.oiaing case aaad t_h: ap_plicwiat would wine; back with a L,a€a d Use application and sa preliminary plait review
that shows draina. e and sewer.
Coins nassi:oner Zahn stated that since the Commission was at a now zoliing Caw., Planned, Des>eiopinent
Z(194-15, we now have the Ulnifi ed Develop mein Co e.. in effect, Commissioner Zzlin ask (li.ty{ Staff if the
1.>DC had Q-w.u;.,ide.mAi .-, `yler stand that the UDC now has an RI- small.
lot subdivision that is similar to this developnient b:ui does not have the same standards. Cogno-issioner Zahn
as:lted if this planned duel-)pme€a€ could lie developed cinder the pi-f_< standards, Mx T-yler suited :it would lam:
'6rnilar but does 'scat meet the miriiri uni r uirernents of the R.1•-L ironing.
Brad Beyer stated he slid not want this plan to he considered as an alternate- since they had previously submitted
PLANNING AND ZONING C 1 MIS'SIONER MEETING -- P.AGF SIX
OCTOBER 4, 19,94
an. talteniaw pltitr l� 6,re. P&Z and. City Cowrci.1. l`he 50' f€. access --as"e €ient 1 €ither a gcxxf faith ;gesture and
ge nerally easements are €of shown (in a Zoning caw,
Comlnisslone.rTyson info.r€ned the Com€ iasiotlt n that there is tro guarantee that fir.. ` ibbets` property W;ll eV r
x developed a� Multi-Family which €nean-:, that the one access easerr€errt completely prech.Wes it from ever
pfc+lee with two accos easr:.t lenta.
"ommiss'loner cmillon stated be aiwa y:s as, a cwiren: a bout last minute changes that have, are impact w th€ to
r} :r€et r; Plan-ruing or 1)R ` input,t, ` e onty way for m € sls € r NicMillor, to suppf)rt thi.:> issue would
be to table the matter grid allow the devt1ojxT and '14�. Tibbets to come to all kg cement. He feels € e. City geis
"shoat. Chang(-Af whenever the re-view pnxess is not followed,
,
C€twmissi€ i�i r *Tyson €rmdc the Tnotion to table ZC#94-15 for the applicxgt to go bi:fo the Engiexnng
Depart€-l€ent and the Development Review Committee showing two accesses from the. Ti:bbet_s properw to the
wesa.r€. rr€.o:A lx undary, .€e motior; w as seco€€ded. by CADmn issior€er eN illon-
Cha;;ry arr Yo,, n�_, called for disrctission 3-along the Commissioners,ners. Cominlssioner-McMillon asked if this could
be tah1ed wifflout putting, restrictions into the motion. lfi wanted this zoning case tabled as it was presented
in order for the developer to krts)w that P&Z vyx: not satisfied with the a igvimcr€t. Commis�,,ionu Tyson stated
be w oI.€ld accept are arrrendrnerrt. to the motion. Corlunissio €er wens stated this case has been before- P&Z ar�,d
1>een denied and has been acted on by it `cJ € i1, qtr rocor¢ime rued a denial tarp€il.:M `1`il�l ts and ��r. Strom
cutil.d pt. together and conne to all agreemer£t. Commissioner Zahn agreed with Commissioner Ow€;r€s<
€;:'o€r€voi,ssio€ u Tyv.3r, withdmww° bi,a mot:on and Corr aiissio er W-MI-I n withdrew his wcond to the motion.
f:°€. . r ris idst£er
Owens made the motion to deny C 4-15. Commissioner Baldwin w.conded the motion..
The votee was as follows-
Ayes- €"on.unissioner z Owens, Baldwin, Bright, McMillor€, Young, Zahn
Nay-s, Commissioner Ty.fjon
The lno i€n. carried,
DJOL N T:
Where b6ng rr .f rti . .:b €siness t:' a;rrnan Young a4journed the mteti.rrg at 8.20 RM,
t hair a n Ronald Yt unfi bay,tp&zf It n .,t :z
AGENDA
CAPITAL IMPROVENMENTS ADVISORY commrra'x,
City of Emlms
Council Chambers, - Building "B"
201. Nortli Ector Dtive
Ear.t , Texas 76039
October , 1994
1. CONSIDERA110N, OF RESOLUTION N-0. 94-02 CIAC
�osis dM.r��t on of :� r�ol.a.€tim. c��n�-eyir£g the �`>�1> �:� 1€.�lrr��ve�£�enas Ac�vis€s€�
t €i-im-g€Estee Semi-A£€ iial. Report Rw the pedodfamfiry 1. 1994 thro{gli Jim-, 00
1994.
94.
114 ADJOURNMENT
)STED IMIS 29TH DAY OF Sl IYUL'MBI--'. .o -199N, AT Pm.
If you r4on In Mend MI,:rgsWW rF%es%Mg d3 W you m'ef-F£s%€fir;
s zistt3e. ,m;k 3t£81 f 2 6a6 MV Reasonable ac omESaovatom ays££N mi a: . Yes a>s:i>t yo"a r needs,
MI-NUTES OF THE
CAPITAL IM-l"'ROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMN1117EE,
OCTOBER 4, 1994
CALL TO ORDER:
The nne'.6ffiIf of the Capital Impn-owea?e€its A vim-�ry Committee was called to order at :-1 P-M,
in the f.``omcil (""ambers for the consideration of whedWed items.
Chaimm Ronald Yo ng
Billy 0%Tns
Robert Mcmillon
Nancy Bright
George Zahn
Carl Tyson
Joy mdwIn
Randy Byers, Director of Pz€bl.ic `orl:-� & Develop.ment.
Patil Kruckemeyer, Cits,, .En ineer
Rod Tyler, City Planner
Andrea ooc er, Assistant City -l-,.nghleer
arbara. Charn Hers, Supervi-Sor
Li. la Lux, 'S€aff Secretary
cansiderasion of a resolu ion conk eying the Capital lmprovements Advisory Committee
Semi.-Annual Deport for the pried: Jammry 1, 194 through nine 30' 1-994.
clair€r an young called the Capital Improvements Advise t), Committee, into sm--ioaz to cAinsiafer
Resolutio n No. 94-02 C'IAC,
lie stated the coinmiftev finds no incglAfies in implemenfin or i.a ipo-,sing impact fees; that the
t:e."am being collec:tec).in accordance with State law; and that the current Lwid U-w-As."'-mnptions
n d Cat,
i al Improvement flan are adNwite.
He also reviewed €77geraoranchn s from 'Paul Krzwk..emyer, City Alin Norwood,
Finalve-, KovinMorccr, Develc?pmen� Ser€>is;es Managen and Rod 'fy ler City Ilan-nor regarding
specific areas of resfymsibilif es relativt- to irripact fees.
co ni-ni€fee Member Goorge Zahn rna e the motion to approve Resolution Nis, 94-02 C°I,` C and
was seconded hmv Committee Member Bi.11s� 0wens.
O-CMU'R 4, IM
The vol.e- Aas as foil-ows.,
Ayes Comn-gittee Meml.vrs Zahn, Owens, 'Fyson, Yo-ung, Bright, Baldwin, McMillen
-Nays, None
'dear motion. carried,
Th:cre beinc- no further business: tda� sficet n.g waa a.4io ed at 8,23 P.M,
f
Chairman Ronal YO"Ural
CLIAC94021'res
RESOLUTION NO. 94-02 CIAO
A RESOLUTION CONVEYING THE SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT OF THE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE, RELATIVE TO THE
PROGRESS OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND THE
IMPOSITION OF IMPACT FEES FOR THE PERIOD BEGINNING
JANUARY 1 , 1994 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1994
WHEREAS; the City Council of the City of: Euless, `:.'exas, has adopted.
the Capital Improvement Plan for Water and Wastewater~lime? (h I"ein t :-
referred to as '°CY,.k:_tal _ir_provf?iI':ent Plans" ) required by ..mater ._i✓
of the Texas Local Governtreat Code for the imposition of impact
fees for water and sanitary sewer. improvements; and
2'9C3EREAS , the City Council, in :omplWance with Chapter 95, has
appointed .x Capital Improvements _.r!d`,`...sCi.r y Committee
implementation` . � o. m i .t e to monitor and
evaluate of te Gr ital improvement Plans;
and
WHEREAS, Chapter 395 requires he C:3.r?.:.ti3l improvements Advisory
Committee to file sf?I;i—aizn`,,'':al reports to the (City Council with
respect to the progress of the Capital improvement Plans and can
perceived inequities in implementing t.C'te plans .t. ipo inn th
impact secs; an
WHEREAS , the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee has monitored
.__i..,. evaluated the implementation ap;_t...,. improvement Plans and
-
imposition of impact fees .
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CAPITAL IMPROVMMMNTS ADVISORY
COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF EULESS , TEXAS
SECTION I
That adequate ,i.>L"ogress 1s being j :T,:ade to _.m l "[i.r_ nt. the. ticSpit i ..
improvement Plans for providing facilities by r~ ..,
attributable to new development .
SECTION 2
The Capital _: prw veCe ts Advisory Committee finds : fi inequities
implementing the Capital impr.'o". ;::e t Plans or imposinq Ehe it"(p.. z
fees .
SECTION 3
impact fees are being collected and : _i funds collected are being
maintained
SECTION 4
It is recommended that no change he avade to the Land Use
Assumptions, Capital improvement Plan, or impact Fees adopted by
the City,
SECTION 5
The semi-annual report, attached hereto be conveyed to the City
Council of the City of Euless, Texas, for its information.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of October, IQ- -
Ronaid <s Yo,ej C --man
Imo. vhf