HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-04-20 AGENDA
PLA RING AND-2QIVING COMMISSION
City of Euless
Council Chambers ® Building "B"
209 N. Ector Drive, Euless, Texas 76039
April 20, f 999
5:30 P.W - Pre-Commission Meting (Conference Room- Building "C")
700 P,M. _ Call to Order(Council Chambers® Building 'B')
Immediately following adjournment will be the Capital Improvements Advisory
Committee Meeting
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ® Commissioner Bright
INVOCATION- Commissioner McMillon
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular meeting of April 6, 9999
AGENDA ITEMS
ITEM "I PUBLIC HEARING - SPECIFIC USE PERMIT #99-06-SUP ® MIDWAY
PARK ADDITION, LOT I3, 108 W. MIDWAY DRIVE
Public input regarding the request for a Specific Use Permit for are
automotive repair business in the current Cat (Community Business
District) zoning, in the Midvay lark Addition, Lot B, 905 West Midway
Drive (formerly "Euless Body shop").
ITEM 2 RECOMMENDATION - SPECIFIC USE PERMIT m #99-06-SU P -
MID AY PARK ADDITION, LOT 13, 908 W. MIDWAY DRIVE
Consider the recommendation regarding the request for a Specific Use
Permit for an automotive repair business in the current C-2 (Community
Business District) zoning, in the Midway bark Addition, Lot B, 108 West
Midway Drive (formerly "Euless Body Shop").
ITEM 3 PUBLIC HEARING - SPECIFIC USE PERMIT - #99-02-SUP -
WILSHIRE VILLAGE SQUARE ADDITION, NORTHEAST PORTION OF
BLOCK T, LOT 7
Public input regarding the request for a Specific Use Permit for a boat sales
and service business in the current C-2 (Community Business District)
zoning, in the Vtdilshire Village Square Addition, Block 1, Portion of Lot 7,
9 501 West Airport Freeway, Suite B.
ITEM 4 RECOMMENDATION - SPECIFIC USE PERMIT W #99-02-SUP
WILSHIRE VILLAGE SQUARE ADDITION, NORTHEAST PORTION OF
BLOCK 'I, LOT 7
Consider the recommendation ation regarding the request for a Specific Use
Permit for a boat sales and service* business in the current CT2
(Community Business District) zoning, in the Wilshire Village Square
Addition, Block 1, Portion of Lot 7, 1501 West Airport Freeway, Suite B.
ITEM 5 VOTE TO RECONSIDER - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT a 3-01-PJ -
WOODCREEK ADDITION, BLOCK G, LOT `I, AND BEAR CREEK
VILLAS I ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOT I
Vote to reconsider the request for a Planned Development for a single
family residential development, changing the zoning from CUD 633
(Community Unit Development for single family and multi-family 24+ units
per acre) and PD 1351 (Planned Development for small lot single family
gated development) into PC (Planned Development for small lot single
family gated development) in the Woodcreek Addition, Block C, Lot 1, and
Sear Creek Villas I Addition, Block A, Lot 1.
ITEM 6 RECONSIDER — PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - #99-01-PD
V40ODCREEK ADDITION, BLOCK G, LOT 1, AND BEAR CREEK
VILLAS I ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOT 9
Reconsider the recommendation regarding the request for a Planned
Development for a single family residential development, changing the
zoning from CUD 533 (Community Unit Development for single family and
multi--family 24+ units per acre) and PD 1351 (Planned Development for
small lot single family gated development) into PD (Planned Development
for small lot single family gated development) in the Woodcreek Addition,
Block G, Lot 1, and Bear Creep Villas I Addition, Black fit,, Lot 1.
ITEM 7 VOTE TO RECONSIDER — SPECIFIC USE PERMIT e #99-03-SUP —
WOODCREEK ADDITION, BLOCK G, LOT 1, AND BEAR CREEK
VILLAS I ADDITION, BLOCK As, LOT 1
`dote to reconsider the request for a single family gated residential
development, located in the Woodcreek Addition, Black G, Lot 1, and Sear
Creek Alas I Addition, dock A, Lot 1.
ITEM 9 RECONSIDER — SPECIFIC USE PERMIT W 99-03-SUP —
WOODCREEK ADDITION., BLOCK G, LOT 1, AND BEAR CREEK
VILLAS I ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOT 1
Reconsider the recommendation regarding the request for a ,single family
gated residential development, located in the Woodcreek Addition, Black
G, Lot 1, and Sear Creek Alas 1 Addition, Block A, Lot 1.
ITEM 9 RECOMMENDATION ION — SITE PLAN a #99-05-SP — OAK FOREST
ADDITION, BLOCK 2, LOT 4R
Consider a recommendation for a site plan for a 2,029 square feet building
fuel center/convenience store Yithin the Cat (Community Business
District) zoning in the Oak Forest Addition, Block 2, Lot 4R, 200 West
Hand Road (Albertson's Fuel Express).
ITEM 10 REPORTS
ITEM 11 DIRECTOR'S REPORT
POSTED THIS 16Th DAY OF APRIL, 1999, AT 4:00 P.W
--------------
Individual Postino Notice
Ef yr, pia b end ft..} .n-eefing and pa h. ad sdDiky ft re Wm vwW wwre nfs eg Op-rmwfi%p�me cxrWto;<r 4°5ee at
(8 E7)U5-1623 Rattsmdit a°c-m-nmodam3 41 be made f3 wsiw±cur ntds.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
APRIL 20, 1999
MINUTES
The Pre-Commission meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to
order by Chairman Ronald Young at 5-30 p.m. in the Building "C" Conference Room, FOLIf
members of the Planning and Zoning Commission were in attendance.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION OF SCHEDULED ITEMS -
COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
Chairman Young called the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting to order at 7:00
p.m. for the consideration of scheduled items. He stated there were four members of the
Planning and Zoning Commission present and that Commissioners Katherine Houk,
Nancy Bright and George Zahn were absent.
MEMBERS AND STAFF PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Chairman Ron Young Nancy Bright
Robert McMillan Katherine Houk
Richard McNeese George Zahn
Billy Owens
Paul Wieneskie, City Attorney
Bo Bass, Director of Planning and Development
David Witcher, Economic Development Manager
Paul Kruckerneyer, City Engineer
Carol Griffith, Planning Services Manager
Donna Brown, Administrative Secretary
VISITORS PRESENT
Henry Rahmani
Kristi Lane
Dean Lane
Matt Durbin
Ron Lane
Gayle Bradley
Randy Scott
Andrew Scroggie
Collin Lasater
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION: The Pledge of Allegiance was 'led by
Commissioner McNeese and the Invocation was given by Commissioner McMillon.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner McNeese moved to approve the minutes of April 6: 1999 with the insertion
of the word "what" in the second paragraph of page 5, to read "he then asked Carol
Griffith what height would be required...". Commissioner Owens seconded the motion.
f I 1.A',.NNfNG AND ZON IN G(-O.M.-NMISSION �,(A.' 2
MINUT F'S OF,VIRII,20, 1999
The vote was as follows:
Ayes: Chairman Young: Commissioners McMillon, McNeese, Owens
Nays.- None
The motion carried.
REGULAR AGENDA
Chairman Young explained the rules for a Public Hearing.
ITEM I PUBLIC HEARING - SPECIFIC USE PERMIT - #99-06-SUP - MIDWAY
PARK ADDITION, LOT B, 108 W. MIDWAY DRIVE
Public input regarding the request for a Specific Use Permit for an
automotive repair business in the Current C-2 (Community Business
District) zoning, in the Midway Park Addition, Lot B. 108 West Midway
Drive (formerly "Euless Body Shop").
Bo Bass, Director of Planning and Development, introduced the case and stated the
reason that a Specific Use Permit (.SUP) is reqUired for this case was because it is an
automotive related use. rvir s explained the purpose of a SUP is t
Bas, o answer h%lo
questions:
1. Does the use fit well at the location? Mr. Bass stated staff believes that it does and
recommends approval on that aspect,
negative. on or off site :rnpacts? Nlr. Bass
2, Has the site design m.figated any potent
stated staff feels that negative impacts have been mitigated and re-carnn-i-ended
approval,
Mr. Bass asked the Con-€miss;on to consider one -ondifion, ;hat the SUP, if approved,
be linnited to Lane's Automotive only.
Chairman Young opened the Public Hearing.
Dean ane. 1001 '!/� S. H. 157, Fort 'Alorth, Texas, stated he owns arld operates Lane's
Automotive. Mr. Lane stated Lane's Autornotive opened for business in December,
1976, and that his dad had run. the business unfit 1988, when he took over- Mr. Lane-.
showed Pictures 0-i of
. k e current and proposed facilities, explained some of the
procedure's of the buisiness such as how they recycle all and listed
1
the irnprcovements they plan to make to the proposed location
1. Paint the building and fence
2. Remove sign in parking lot and paint sign on the bUilding or fence
1 Remove the wooden fence and clean parking lot area
4 Re-stripe the parking lot.
There being no other speakers, Chairman Young closed the Public Hearing.
I_NNING AND ZONI'�L,Co?viiVrTSti_tO i PAGE'
20. 1999
ITEM 2 RECOMMENDATION — SPECIFIC USE PERMIT -- #99-06-SUP
MIDWAY PARK ADDITION, LOT 13, 108 W. MIDWAY DRIVE
Consider the recommendation regarding the request for a Specific; Use
Permit for an automotive repair business in the current C2 (Community
Business District? zoning, in the Midway Park Addition, Lot B, 108 West
Midway Drive (formerly "Euless Body Shop"').
Bo Bass, Director of Plannirng and Development, gave a brief description of the case
and stated that staff recommended approval with the condition that the SUP should be
limited to Lane's Automotive alone.
Commissioner McNeese asked the applicant what kind of storage he would have for oil
chancres. Mr. Lane answered lie would have an above ground storage tank,
Commissioner McNeese then asked if there would be any kind of underground storage.
Mr. Lane answered no. Commissioner McNeese asked Mr. Lane to clarify whether he
was going to recycle hazardous materials. Mr. Lane answered lie is currently recycling
the oil and that if any new laves come up he would try to abide by them.
Commissioner McNeese asked if the dumpster used to be where part of the wood fence
is. Mr. Lane answered the dumpster had been outside the fence but that it was moved
inside the fence to prevent just anyone from dumping trash into it. Commissioner
McNeese asked if the fence could be replaced with something other than metal
because he had a problem with a metal fence, and he suggested that the applicant use
some other
material such as masonry, Mr. Lane ansbr�ered he had not. thought about
changing it and asked if the entire fence had to match the building. Mr. Bass stated
there are several options for masonry: brink,, stone, halite blocks, stucco or pre-cast
Pane[ Wall.
Cormissioner McMillon stated he has sewn some of the masonry fen es that have
be-en put tip and that he does not like them very much. He staated that if this SUP was
not approved, the property would continue to deteriorate If left vacant. Commissioner
MaMillon stated he appreciated the fact that this operation ,Mould be 5 days a week, arid
not weekends, and that he was in favor of the project.
Comrniss.ioner Owens statecl he was riot in favor of this pf-oject but that he has known
the applicant's family and feels t,Ar. Lane would do a amod job. Commissioner Owens
stated the air conditioners on top of the building have always been an eye sor art
asked if Mr. tune had considered adding screening. Mr-. Lane stater that he might Ladd
some screening in front of the single unit that is on the roof, but he will face
considerable expense Just moving in, and so he probably could not do it right away.
Commissioner Owens asked if there would be enough parking. Mr. Bass stated that
one parking space is required per 4€ 0 square feet and that Mr. Lane has enough room
for at least 20 parking spaces.
Mr. Lane stated that the previous owner had told him that the City of Euless has plans
to widen Main Street and add a turn lane onto Midway, so the Artech building will be
demolished, therefore making his building a corner property. Commissioner Owens
asked the City Engineer what would happen to Maim Street. City Engineer Paul
l-ANNfNG AND ZO'N€N6 C0,k1Sd1S.SIe?N PAGTE 4
1,t:ti t_ 1'1 S Of APRIL If'. 1499
Kruckemeyer answered that the decision has not been made yet, but that it was one of
the discussions during the design phase of Main Street widening project. Mr.
Kruckemeyer stated that the corner building (currently Artech) would probably be
acquired by the City and would not remain. Commissioner Owens expressed concerns
about customers parking vehicles overnight outside the fence. Mr. Bass stated that the
code specifically forbids outdoor storage without screening and forbids work outside the
building, and that code enforcement staff would watch Mr_ Lane's operation.
Commissioner Owens requested that the minutes reflect that the applicant was told to
be aware of concerns about outdoor storage and work outside the building, especially
since he would be next to the Recreation Center and park_ Commissioner Owens stated
that even though a lot was not shown on the drawing, Mr. Lane would be expected to
comply with all City requirements. Commissioner Owens stated that he would normally
vote against this except that it is a small business.
Chairman Young asked the applicant if he intended to do any additional exterior
lighting. Mr. Lane answered that he is planning to remove the sign., and this would take
light away but that he will place at least 2 lights in front of the building to shine into the
parking lot for customers to drop cars off at night. Chairman Young asked the applicant
if he intended to repair or resurface the pavement in the parking area. Mr. Lane
answered he planned to look into that and if any repairs were needed he would do
theca.
Chairman Young asked if the applicant would need to meet lighting ordinance
requirements. Mr. Bass answered tl-iere was no requirement to do so but that there are
guidelines in the new ordinance that the applicant could consider
Commissioner McNeese asked the applicant if he considered the property to be
environmentaliv clean. Mr. Lane answered yes. C:ommiss;oner McNeese asked if a
phase one environmental assessment done on the property, and Mr. Lane answered
not yet. Commissioner McNeese stated he is in favor of small businesses but that the
was still concerned about the white 8 or 10 feet fence, and if tr e-re was no indic,at o,
there would be a change, he could not support the SUP.
Commissioner Owens asked tl-e applicant if he v OUld have any problems with til
Commission tying the SUP to his business and limiting it to 5 years. He also asked for
staffs opinion of that, Mr-, Bass answered tl'at staffs position €4 that it should be t ed to
the owner but that he did not believe, it was fair to place a tirne limit on it unless there
was a lease involved.
Commissioner Owens stated that when the motion dPbtas made. he would like to see the
condition that °here be screening around the air conditioner unit on the roof, and that
the fence be masonry.
Chairman Young stated that Mr. Bass brought up a valid point that there are starting
costs involved here, and that Cormissioner Owens brought up a valid paint about
screening the unit on the roof. Chairman Young asked Commissioner McNeese hour he
would feel about having a time limit to have these things accomplished or tying it to the
Main Street construction. Commissioner McNeese answered that would be ok as long as
the applicant thought 4 was a good compromise and it was a reasonable time frame. Mr.
�rJl\i;'F'F S OF AYY,:i:20, 1
Lane stated that if the building that is Artech now is removed and his became a corner
property, he would not have a problem building some sort of a concrete or brick wall.
Mr. Kruckemeyer stated that if the Artech building is removed and that corner becomes
city property, that it is the Park's Department intention to build a substantial monument
and install heavy landscaping. Commissioner McMillon asked if the Main Street
renovation is imminent. Mr. Kruckemeyer stated that the Main Street renovation at the
earliest could be started in January, 2000. He stated it would last for about 14 to 13
months. He stated that if Harwood is done first and is started in October, 1999, this would
mean that the Main Street renovation would be put off a year,
Commissioner Owens made the motion to approve Specific Use Permit #99-00-SUP with
the following stipulations:
1, A parapet wall would be erected around units on roof.
2. A 0 feet brick fence would be erected where the wood fence is now and would be
completed in 3 years.
3, The SUP would be tied to business owner Dean Lane.
Commissioner McNeese seconded the motion.
Commissioner MdAillon stated he was concerned about requiring a brick fence that is
costly when there are alternatives that are acceptable,
Chairman Young stated that if the Commission and City Council feel t')at brick is what is
needed, it should be put in the ordinance but that he did not think this requirement s"ould
be imposed on Mr. Lane when the ordinance only requires masonry [not brick
L
specifically], Chairman Young stated he was opposed to requiring a trick fence but not
opposed to requinng rnasonry that conforms to the Unified Development ("ode.
The vote was as follows.
Ayes: Corn,missioners McNeese, Owens
Nays: Chairman Young, Commissioner McMillon
The motion failed.
Commissioner i'`JlcMillon rnade the motion to =±pp rove- Specific ljs , Perri #99-06-SUP as
presented but with the stipulations-
1. within 3 years the owner:-you'd erect a masonry fennce
2. a parapet wall would be installed to shield ,.tilities on thle roof
3, SUP would be tied to present owners Dean and Ron Lane.
C?;airrnan Young seconded the motion.
The vote was as follows:
Ayes: Chairman Young, Commissioners McMillon, Owens
Nays: Commissioner McNeese
The motion carried.
PLANNI?G AN.F.ZONIN.6 CONI-MISSION, PAGE 5
M1NI1'1'I S OU AML'`. 1999
ITEM! 3 PUBLIC HEARING — SPECIFIC USE PERMIT - #99-02-SUP
WILSHIRE VILLAGE SQUARE ADDITION, NORTHEAST PORTION OF
BLOCK 1, LOT 7
Public input regarding the request for a Specific Use Permit for a boat
sales and service business in the current C-2 (Community Business
District} zoning, in the Wilshire Village Square Addition, Block 1, Portion of
Lot 7, 1501 1,ftlest Airport Freeway, Suite B.
Bo Bass, Director of Planning and Development, gave a brief description of the case
and stated that the applicant is asking to lease a vacant structure. Mr. Bass stated that
a Specific Use Permit is a two fold issue:
1. Is the use appropriate for the location?
2. Are there any negative on or off site impacts?
Mr, Bass stated that staff feels the use is appropriate for the location and that staff does
not feel there are negative impacts. Staff recommends approval with the following two
conditions:
1. Because this is a change in occupancy type the new lighting ordinance does require
a lighting plan, A lighting plan has not been submitted yet, but staff has confidence
that this will occur..
2. Limit this SUP to Ski Tex only,
Chairman Young opened tie Public Hearing and asked the applicant to come to th'e
pod iiuni.
Batt 'Durbin, 3809 Airport Freeway, Bedford, Texas, stated the biggest purpose for the
move is to gain space. l-le stated that he lias been in business since. 19°81: and that the
bulgy of his business is retail sporting goods,
)'here being no other speakers, Chairman Young closed the Public Hearing.
ITEM d RECOMMENDATION --- SPECIFIC USE PERMIT - #99-02-SUP —
WILSHIRE 'PILLAGE SQUARE ADDITION, NORTHEAST PORTION OF
BLOCK 1, L..OT 7
Consider the recommendation regarding the teques` for a S'pecifilc Use
P-lermit for a boat sales and sere :ct business in the CW-Tei-3t C-2
COIITImunity Business District) zoning, in the A"Ishire Village Sgi,lare
Addition, Block 1 , Portion of L_ot 7, 1'501 %, lest,airport Freeway, Sate B.
Bo Bass, Director of Planning and Development, gave a brief description of the case
and stated that staff wholeheattedly recommended approval with two conditions:
1. Receipt and review of lighting plan
2. Limited to applicant only
Commissioner McMillon asked the applicant about the length of the proposed lease,
and. Mr, Durbin answered 5 years. Commissioner McMillon asked Mr. Durbin if there
P€,ANNY.NG AND ZONING COMMISSION PA(sE
1 2IN€;"T'ES OF AP€SI€.20. 1939
would he a problem if the SUP were tied to the length of the lease, to which Mr. Durbin
answered no.
Chairman Young asked the applicant what his timetable would be to get the lighting
plan to the staff. Mr. Durbin answered that the problem he was running into was that
because it is a new ordinance; the lighting engineers and architects are not familiar with
it and they do not know exactly what City is asking for.
Commissioner McNeese also asked how Mr. Durbin would store and dispose of
flammable or combustible materials. Mr. Durbin answered that he currently has two 55
gallon transportable drums where he stores the oil taken out of the beats, and this nil is
picked up by a recycling company. Mr. Durbin stated that he buys new rail in small
quantities, not in bulk. Mr. Durbin stated he has some diesel fuel he uses for a tractor
but that it is in a proper container, and that he does not store gasoline on the premises.
Commissioner NIcNeese asked Mr. Sass if all of this met fire codes. Mr. Bass
answered that the Fire Marshal had quizzed Mr. Durbin quite extensively, and had
required MSDS sheets.
Com missioner McNeese stated that the application stated "there would he no adverse
impacts including noise that Ski Tex foresees at this time", He asked the applicant if ht
was very sure he would riot be creating noise levels that would cause the neighbors to
react adversely. Mr. Durbin answered that his business does not create more noise
than there is now with diesel trucks bringing in plants to the Plant Shed, forklifts, and
cars in and out. Mr. Durbin also stated that the E'.PA is requiring that boats be t;uieter.
Commissioner McNeese asked if the building was fully sprink'(-d. Mr. Durbin answered
yes and that he had agreed with the owner that everything lhad to be fully operation-.a
before he rnoved in. Commissioner N'IcNeese asked the applicant whet kind of ren ja`
option tie would have .:after 5 years-. I'`Jlr, Durbin answered he has the option to renew.
Mr. Sass clarified whether the tune ups and cranking of motors would occur inside the
shop. Mr. `),urbin answered yes Mr. Bass also asked if irrir~iedi:ately behind the area
there is an existing series of greenhouses that would further buffer the noise. Mr.
DiArlo€n nswt::red yes.
Commissione- {. wr—.,r.s made the motion to approve Case #99---02-SUI=T as presented] in
the packet. After further discussion Commissioner Ov ens his rnotion.
Commissioner McNeese rnade the motion to approve Sp(:�ci°ic Use Permit #g3-02-`i!P
with the stipulation that staff be provided with the lighting plan as anticipated and the
SUS' be tied to a h year term. Commissioner Owens seconded the motion.
The vote was as follows-.
Ayes: Chairman Young., Commissioners McMillon; McNeese, Owens
Nays: none
The motion carried,
N.A.NNI `6 AN'D PAGE" 8
MINU FF=Q 01,AMR-2i).
ITEM 5 VOTE TO RECONSIDER - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - #99-01-PD -
WOODCREEK ADDITION, BLOCK G, LOT 1, AND BEAR CREEK
VILLAS I ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOT I
Vote to reconsider the request for a Planned Development for a single
family residential development changing the zoning from CUD 633
(.Community Unit Development for single family and multi-family 24+ units
per acre) and PD 1351 (Planned Development for small lot single family
gated development) into PD (Planned Development for small lot single
family gated development) in the Woodcreek Addition, Block G, Lot 1, and
Bear Creek Villas I Addition, Block A, Lot 1.
Bo Bass, Director of Planning and Development, stated that the applicant had reduced
the width of the lots in the north Dart of the proposed subdivision to match the south part
He stated that in the block at the ouiter edge of the proposed subdivision, one lot was
added, two lots were widened, and common open space was increased. Mr. Bass stated
that in the interior black. one lot was added and the common open space was increased.
He stated that this project therefore needed to be reconsidered by the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Paul VIieneskie, City Attorney, stated that the motion would have to be made by
Commissioners who had previously voted in favor of the project.
Commissioner McNeese ma- de the motion to reconsiler Panned [.1 -.veloprnent case
#99-0i:-PD. 'Commissioner McMillan seconded the action.
-F,he vote was as foilows,
Ayes, Chairman; Young, Cornmissio per s: McMii:lon, McNeese,, 0%,vens
Nays: None
The motion carried.
ITEM 6 RECONSIDER — PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - #99-01-PD —
WOODCREEK ADDITION, BLOCK G, LOT 1, AND BEAR CREEK
VILLAS I ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOT I
D
Reconsider the regarding the request for a P`an ned
Development for a single family residential development, charigirla the
zorl::ng from CUID 633 (""ornm1wrifty Ur--.it -Development for single fal-ni::y and
Multi•farmly 24+ units per acre) and PD 1351 (Planned Development for
smal: lot single family gated development) into PD (Planned Development
for small lot single family gated development) in the-,, 'Woodcreek Addition,
Block G, Lot 1 , and Bear Creek Villas I Addition. Block A, Lot 1,
Bo Bass, Director of Planning and Development, stated he was available to answer any
questions,
YI..:^ti�1€''•Ci AND Z()\I"»v C,()MIMISS10 v
Chairman Young stated that the minimum lot size had not decreased and that the
minimum lot size was not any smaller than what was originally presented to the
Commission.
Conan issioner Mc;Neese stated that at the last meeting Commissioner Owens had mace
the motion with an 6 feet wood fence on the northern side. but in the Mans Mr. Rahmani
requested a 6 feet fence
Henry Rahrnani, 1692 Alfieri Drive, Euless, Texas, stated that the initial request was for 6
feet and that somehow he had made a mistake and mentioned 8 feet. Mr. Rahmani later
realized all the neighbors have 6 feet fences and that vras why he requested the fence to
be 6 feet in height.
Commissioner Owens asked if there were any other changes besides what had already
been listed. Mr. Rahmani answered there were none.
Commissioner McMillon made the motion to recomanend approval of Planned
Development case #99-61 -PD as presented. Commissioner Mc,Neese seconded the
motion.
The vote was as follows:
Ayes- Chairman Young, Commissioners McMillon, McNeese, Owens
Mays: None
The motion carried.
ITEM 7 VOTE TO RECONSIDER -. SPECIFIC USE PERMIT - #99-03-SUP
OODCREEK ADDITION, BLOCK O, LOT 1, AND BEAR CREEK
VILLAS t ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOT I
Vote to reconsider the request for a single family gated residential
deve`:opme€.f. located in the Woodcreek Addition, Block Gs, Lot 1, and
Bear Creek Villas I Addition, Block A. Lot 1-
Bo Bass, Director of Planning and Develop! iert, g av e a description of the C: �� and
stated that as in the previous, request the, design had not been -,--fl1 erred
and
t'ha there as no chan,,,--e than,,,--e €n off site or- on site i€ip-acts on the environ€lent. W,
stated that staff reccommendied app oval.
Chairman Young stated that the Specific Use Permit was necessary because the
proposed development WOgild be a gated icorrmunity.
Commissioner McNeese made the motion to reconsider case #919-6W-SDP.
Commissioner McMillon seconded the motion.
The vote was as follows:
Ayes: Chairman Young, Commissioners McMillon, McNeese, Owens
Nays: None
The motion carried.
ITEM 8 RECONSIDER - SPECIFIC USE PERMIT - #99-03-SUS' _
WOODCREEK ADDITION, BLOCK O, LOT 1, AND BEAR CREEK
VILLAS I ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOT I
Reconsider the recommendation regarding the request for a single family
gated residential development, located in the., Woodcreek Addition, Block
G, Lot 1, and Bear Creek Villas I Addition, Bloch A, Lot 1.
Bo Bass, Director of Planning and Development, stated he was available to answer any
questions, and that staff recommended approval.
Chairman Young stated that any motion for the case should probably tie the SUP to
Monarch Development as it was at the last meeting.
Commissioner McNeese made the motion to recornmend Specific Use Permit #99-03-
SUP, with the condition that it be tied to Monarch Development. Commissione: Owens
seconded the motion
The vo*,- was as follows'.
Ayes: Chairman `:<or€Y3g. Commissioners McMillon, Mr Neese, Owens
Nays: None
The motion carried.
ITEM 9 RECOMMENDATION - SITE PLAN #99-05-SP - OAK FOREST
ADDITION, BLOCK 2, LOT 4P_
Consider a recomr-nendation for a site plan for a 2,029 squa€-e feet
building fuel centerlconvenience store within the C-2 (Com-nunity
Business District) toning 'n tine Oak Forest Addi='on, Block 2: l..ct 41:'*�:. ,,1)
,'Jes: .--lar<vood Road (Albertson s, Fuel Express';
So Fuss, Director of Planning and l_3ev-lopnner�t, f -�ve � <:iescri otior� of tl�e ca,_- r: c
stated that Site Plans are ministerial. Mr. Bass, also stated staff is ccimfortable th.
applicant will provide all the i:°-f ormation required, Nil-, Says pointed o4:t a letter n the_
Plannina a,-,d Zoning Commissioners' packet from A berts.;n's stating they intend to
comply with the Development Review Committee (DRC� commients t;f 4_10-90. Mr.
Bass stated that staff feels that a fuel express is an excellent use for this locatic"n and
that the design meets the City-'s design criteria. He stated staff recommended approval
and that he was available to answer any questions.
Chairman Young requested the applicant or applicant's representative to come forward
to answer any questions.
Andrew Scroggie; 6560 W. Freeway, Suite 900, Fort Worth, Texas, stated he
represented the Woodmo#at companies.
Commissioner McNeese asked if the insulation of the fuel tanks would be consistent
with all fire regulations and codes. Mr. Bass answered yes and stated that Albertson's
would have to meet all the procedures and regulations of the Fire Department, as well
as Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission tTNRCC` require# rents,
Commissioner McNeese stated that he would like the approval of this case to contain
the condition that Albertson's will comply with the requirements of tine 'Unified
Development Code (UDC). lair, Bass recommended that the Commission also
specifically refer to the Df;C comments of April 13, 1999,
Chairillan kung asked if a lighting plan was one of the things Albertson's needs to do.
Pair. Bass answered that the lighting plan had been submitted.
Commissioner- McMillon made the motion to approve case #99-05-SP with the condition
that all [)PC comments will be met by the applicant Commissioner McNeese
seconded the motion.
The vote was as follows:
Ayes'. Chairman Young, Commissioners McKllon, McNeese, Owens
Nays, None
The notion carried
ITEM 10 REPORTS
An updated case status report was inclined in the packet.
ITEM 11 DIRECTORS S REPORT
There was no report.
ADJOURNMENT..
There beinaa €€ , -:-rt'"er bLJS#ne.ss, :�hairmr 41. vout .3� aG,our€1eJ the .€#ew #"?CF at u.a p. n.
i
Chairman Ron,,W, Y� Date
j 1
AGENDA
CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
City of Euless
Council Chambers — Building "B"
201 N. Ector Drive, Euless, Vexes 76039
April 29, 1999
7.0 3 P.M. — CALL TO ORDER Councii Chambers --- Euilring "E"j
Omrnediate:;y following the Planning and Zoning Con mission Meeting}
ITEM 1 Approval of t0inutes of April 6; 1999, meeting
ADJOURNMENT
POSTED THIS 16'" DAY OF APRIL, 1999, AT 4:00 PM
,t
Individual Posting Notice
If you plan to a tend his Public meeting and you have a disabiky that requires arrangem.ents a
the rleetin g, ;olease coniad our office at (81-17) 685-1,623. Peas;-male Etccot"nrl odptions wifi be made to
assist vour i:eeds.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES
April 20, 1999
MEMBERS AND STAFF PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Chairman Ron Young Nancy Bright
Robert McMillon Katherine Houk
Richard McNeese George Zahn
Billy Owens
Paul Wieneskie, City Attorney
Bo Bass, Director of Planning and Development
David Witcher, Economic Development Manager
Paul Kruckemeyer, City Engineer
Carol Gdfl:ith, Planning Services Manager
Donna Brown, Administrative Secretary
Chairman Young called the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee meeting to order
at 8:35 p.m., immediately following the adjournment of the regular Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting.
Commissioner McNeese made the motion to approve the minutes of April 6, 1999, for the
Capital Improvements Advisory Committee as written. Commissioner McMillon seconded
the motion.
The vote was as follows:
Ayes: Chairman Young, Commissioners McMillon, McNeese, Owens
Nays. None
The motion carried.
There beings further business, Chairman Young adjourned the meeting at 8:38 p,m.
.....--• -
Chairman Roryl oun D e
, f
S
.J